Wilderness Characteristics Evaluation
South Warner Rim Area
Interdisciplinary Team Signature Sheet
The following interdisciplinary (ID) team conducted an evaluation of wilderness
character within the South Warner Rim area. The evaluation included field inventory and
an analysis ofthe routes within the proposed area, as well as an evaluation of the
wilderness characteristics within the area. This signature sheet documents the BLM ID
Team members that participated in this process along with the member's agreement with
the conclusions reached in the road analysis and wilderness character forms completed
for the area.
ID Team Members:
~M
~"'*"'9'
Date: /0
Todd Forbes
.
Associate Field anager for Wildlife, Fisheries, Riparian, Hydrology, ifderness,
Recreation, and Cultural
~~
TheresaRomasko
Date:
/o!or/.;;z.oo'l
Associate Field Manager for Range, Fuels, Weeds, Botany, and Special Forest Products
\?aM~ l.AJ~QdA
Paul Whitman
Planning and Environmental COOY inator
..1;:1.,'9
.
Date:
.
Les Boothe
c1,,11 [)t'7ttL$
Range Management Specialist
Date:
Breanna O'Connor ~l/LAItA U . ~
Recreation Technician
Date:
Vernon Stofleth
Wildlife Biologist
~1
~-
Glenn Lorton ~
Wildlife Biologist
~
Date:
//(///!A..,,/
i~Utf/k-I
Date:
f'J
J 13/0'1
--I--J.<-lI
r
/0/13/09
, ,
/0 II 'S
­
I~oor.
Year: 2009
Inventory Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118/Wakefield Cabin
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_
a) Inventory Source: _Wilderness Inventory: Oregon and Washington Final
Intensive Inventory Decisions November 1980__
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):_Wakefield Cabin/1-118
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Intensive Wilderness Inventory Final Decisions
November, 1980_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area,
Lakeview, Oregon_
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
BLM
Private
28,880
1,360
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
N
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
N
N
Unknown
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY
CONDITIONS
a. Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118/Wakefield Cabin
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes __X__
No _____
Boundary Determination: In 2008, BLM conducted field inventory of the area to update
its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo documentation of the
boundary routes and some of the interior routes. Using both ONDA and BLM photos,
field logs, and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an
analysis of the main motorized routes within the area in 2009.
The results of the route analysis are documented in the road analysis forms contained in
the wilderness evaluation file. On the east, the unit is bounded by the Bonneville Power
Association (BPA) power line right-of-way (750 feet from centerline). On the south, the
unit is bounded by County Road 3-14 and private lands. On the north, the unit is
bounded by a combination of private lands and the Highway 140 right-of-way (150 feet
from centerline) (see Maps 1 and 2, road analysis forms, photos, photo logs, and BLM ID
team minutes in the wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information
regarding these boundary determinations). The inventory unit currently contains about
24,333 acres of BLM-administered land and about 1,280 acres of private land inholdings
located in the center of the unit (Map 2).
Following the boundary determination, the BLM ID team subsequently examined the
previous inventory information contained in the BLM’s wilderness inventory files and
published inventory documents, and its own recent field inventory information, and then
conducted an inter-disciplinary evaluation of the current wilderness characteristics within
the unit boundary. The results are contained in the following section. Additional
background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is
contained in the ID team meeting notes and the document, Wilderness Inventory
Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area, BLM. Both documents are
contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The inventory unit is located about 5 miles west of Adel, Oregon (Map 1). This unit is
halfmoon-shaped and is about 11 miles long and 7 miles wide. The majority of the unit is
located on a high plateau that consists of a large, sagebrush-covered flat surrounding Big
Lake. About 4 miles of the Deep Creek Canyon cut across the northwest corner of the
unit. Low juniper-covered hills exist across the southwest, west, and northeast portions
of the unit. The southwest corner also contains some very low basalt rims and Juniper
2
Lake. The 500-Kv BPA power line, just outside the eastern boundary, remains a
dominant man-made feature visible from a majority of the unit.
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes _____
No __X __
N/A _____
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory identified 25 miles of primitive vehicle
ways, 15 man-made reservoirs, and pasture fences within the unit. The reservoirs were
described as “substantially noticeable”. Thirteen miles of fence were found to be
“substantially noticeable” while other fences passing through juniper areas were less
noticeable. The inventory noted that the 500-Kv BPA power line along the eastern
boundary was a dominant man-made feature visible over a vast majority of the unit.
Based on the number of intrusions found and their scattered distribution, the unit was not
found to be in a natural condition that was primarily affected by the forces of nature.
Current Condition Description: The area topography and vegetation have changed
little since 1980. However, western juniper has expanded across portions of the unit
(Map 3).
There are currently 27 constructed waterholes and reservoirs, 2 developed spring
systems, and approximately 41 miles of pasture division fence within the unit. Many of
these waterholes have been maintained in recent years. Currently, there are
approximately 27.6 miles of primitive motorized routes within the unit. One small
abandoned rock pit exists along the northeast boundary of the unit near Highway 140 and
one active ODOT rock pit exists along the northwestern boundary near the Highway 140
S-Curve relocation (Map 2). About 3 of the 8 acres of active mining disturbance fall
within the unit. These developments/disturbances are scattered throughout the unit and
most are substantially noticeable within close proximity (a quarter mile) and are less
noticeable from further distances (see photos and photo log).
While the total size of this inventory unit has decreased by about 4,500 acres since 1980,
the total amount of human-caused disturbances have increased substantially and, when
considered cumulatively, detract from the overall the natural quality of the area. For
these reasons, the ID team found that the natural character within the unit has not
changed substantially since 1980 and the unit still does not currently meet the naturalness
criteria.
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the majority of the unit was
identified as a large, low-sage flat which offered practically no opportunity for solitude.
3
The southwest portion of the unit, with small rims and juniper cover and the northwest
portion of the unit traversing Deep Creek Canyon, were found to offer some opportunities
for solitude, but these areas were restricted in size and not outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the naturalness
criteria. For this reason, the current opportunities for solitude within the unit was not
evaluated
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, the unit was found to offer some
opportunities for primitive recreation in the Deep Creek area and in the southwest
portion, but these opportunities were limited to a small area within the unit and were not
outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the naturalness
criteria. For this reason, the current opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation
within the unit was not evaluated
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No ____
NA _X_
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, archaeological values were identified
as a potential value in the area, though none were actually documented at that point in
time.
Description: Supplemental values were not evaluated during the current inventory as the
unit did not meet the naturalness criteria described above.
4
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Wakefield CabiniOR-015-118
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
No
---.1LYes
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
Yes
~No
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or primitive and
unconfined types of recreation?
_ _Yes _ No ---.1LNA
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
Yes
No
X NA
Conclusion (Check One):
_
The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
~The
area does not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Name and Title)
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna 0 'Connor
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Approved by:
\Lc~
/O/~7
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
5
Year: 2009
Northwest
Inventory Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118B/Wakefield Cabin
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_
a) Inventory Source: _Wilderness Inventory: Oregon and Washington Final
Intensive Inventory Decisions, November 1980__
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):_Wakefield Cabin/1-118
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Intensive Wilderness Inventory Final Decisions
November, 1980_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area,
Lakeview, Oregon_
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
BLM
Private
28,880
1,360
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
N
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
N
N
Unknown
1
a. Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118B/Wakefield Cabin Northwest
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes ____
No __X___
Boundary Determination: In 2008, BLM conducted field inventory of the area to update
its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo documentation of the
boundary routes and some of the interior routes. Using both ONDA and BLM photos,
field logs, and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an
analysis of the main motorized routes within the area in 2009. The results of the route
analysis are documented in the road analysis forms contained in the wilderness evaluation
file.
This inventory unit is bounded on the east, north, south, and much of the west, by private
land boundaries. On the southwest, the unit is bounded by an unnumbered road (see
Maps 1 and 2, road analysis forms, photos, photo logs, and BLM ID team minutes in the
wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information regarding these boundary
determinations).
The process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is contained in the
document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area,
BLM, and the ID team meeting notes contained in the wilderness inventory file.
In 1980, this area was considered as part of a larger Wakefield Cabin (1-118) inventory
unit. In reality, it is adjacent to the Wakefield Cabin Unit, not contiguous with it due to
the presence of private land boundaries (Map 2). The inventory unit currently contains
about 2,031 acres of BLM-administered land.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The inventory unit is located about 9 miles west of Adel, Oregon (see Maps 1 and 2).
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory identified the larger Wakefield Cabin
unit (1-118) as containing 25 miles of primitive vehicle ways, 15 man-made reservoirs,
and pasture fences within the unit. The reservoirs were described as “substantially
noticeable”. Thirteen miles of fence were found to be “substantially noticeable” while
other fences passing through juniper areas were less noticeable. The inventory noted that
the 500-Kv BPA power line along the eastern boundary was a dominant man-made
feature visible over a vast majority of the unit. Based on the number of intrusions found
and their scattered distribution, the unit was not found to be in a natural condition where
it is primarily affected by the forces of nature.
2
Current Condition Description: The current unit is separated from most of the former
unit 1-118 by private lands and does not meet the minimum size criteria or any of the
exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current natural character of the unit
was not evaluated.
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the larger Wakefield Cabin unit
was identified as a large, low-sage flat which offered practically no opportunity for
solitude.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for solitude were not evaluated.
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, the larger Wakefield Cabin unit was
found to offer some opportunities for primitive recreation in the Deep Creek area and in
the southwest portion, but these opportunities were limited to a small area and were not
outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No _____
NA _X_
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, archaeological values were identified
as a potential value in the larger Wakefield Cabin unit, though none had actually been
documented at that point in time.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the supplemental
values were not evaluated.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Wakefield Cabin Northwest/OR-OI5-118B
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
Yes lNo
No]LNA
Yes
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
_Yes _ No l
NA
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
Yes
No lNA
Conclusion (Check One):
_ _ The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
X
The area does not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Names and Titles):
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna O'Connor
Vernon Stotleth
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Wildlife Biologist
Approved by:
~r:~
/())~ f
Date
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFR parts 4 or 1610.5-2.
4
Year: 2009
Southeast
Inventory Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118C/Wakefield Cabin
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_
a) Inventory Source: _Wilderness Inventory: Oregon and Washington Final
Intensive Inventory Decisions, November 1980__
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):_Wakefield Cabin/1-118
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Intensive Wilderness Inventory Final Decisions
November, 1980_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area,
Lakeview, Oregon_
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
BLM
Private
28,880
1,360
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
N
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
N
N
Unknown
1
a. Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118C/Wakefield Cabin Southeast
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes ____
No __X___
Boundary Determination: In 2008, BLM conducted field inventory of the area to update
its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo documentation of the
boundary routes and some of the interior routes. Using both ONDA and BLM photos,
field logs, and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an
analysis of the main motorized routes within the area in 2009. The results of the route
analysis are documented in the road analysis forms contained in the wilderness evaluation
file.
This inventory unit is bounded on the east by the the BPA 500 Kv power line right-ofway (750 feet on each side of centerline), on the north by BLM Road 7132-B0, on the
south by an unnumbered BPA access road, and on the west by BLM Road 7132-00 (see
Maps 1 and 2, road analysis forms, photos, photo logs, and BLM ID team minutes in the
wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information regarding these boundary
determinations).
The process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is contained in the
document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area,
BLM, and the ID team meeting notes contained in the wilderness inventory file.
In 1980, this area was considered as part of the larger Wakefield Cabin (1-118) inventory
unit. Currently, it is separated from this unit by BLM Roads 7132-00 and 7132-B0 (Map
2). The inventory unit currently contains about 3,011 acres of BLM-administered land
and does not meet the size criteria.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The inventory unit is located about 6 miles southwest of Adel, Oregon (see Maps 1 and
2).
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory identified the larger Wakefield Cabin
unit as containing 25 miles of primitive vehicle ways, 15 man-made reservoirs, and
pasture fences within the unit. The reservoirs were described as “substantially
noticeable”. Thirteen miles of fence were found to be “substantially noticeable” while
other fences passing through juniper areas were less noticeable. The inventory noted that
the 500-Kv BPA power line along the eastern boundary was a dominant man-made
feature visible over a vast majority of the unit. Based on the number of intrusions found
2
and their scattered distribution, the unit was not found to be in a natural condition where
it is primarily affected by the forces of nature.
Current Condition Description: The current unit does is split off from former unit 1118 by BLM Roads 7132-00 and 7132-B0 and not meet the minimum size criteria or any
of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current natural character of the
unit was not evaluated.
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the larger Wakefield Cabin unit
was identified as a large, low-sage flat which offered practically no opportunity for
solitude.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for solitude were not evaluated.
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, the larger Wakefield Cabin unit was
found to offer some opportunities for primitive recreation in the Deep Creek area and in
the southwest portion, but these opportunities were limited to a small area and were not
outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No _____
NA _X_
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, archaeological values were identified
as a potential value in the larger Wakefield Cabin unit, though none had actually been
documented at that point in time.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the supplemental
values were not evaluated.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Wakefield Cabin Southeast/OR-015-118C
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
Yes lNo
Yes
No]LNA
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
Yes _No lNA
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
Yes
No lNA
Conclusion (Check One):
_ _ The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
X
The area does not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Names and Titles):
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna O'Connor
Vernon Stofleth
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Wildlife Biologist
Approved by:
~c~
/0/0'
Date
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
4
Year: 2009
Inventory Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118D/Wakefield Cabin South
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_
a) Inventory Source: _Wilderness Inventory: Oregon and Washington Final
Intensive Inventory Decisions, November 1980__
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):_Wakefield Cabin/1-118
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Intensive Wilderness Inventory Final Decisions
November, 1980_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area,
Lakeview, Oregon_
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
BLM
Private
28,880
1,360
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
N
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
N
N
Unknown
1
a. Unit Number/Name: OR-015-118D/Wakefield Cabin South
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes ____
No __X___
Boundary Determination: In 2008, BLM conducted field inventory of the area to update
its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo documentation of the
boundary routes and some of the interior routes. Using both ONDA and BLM photos,
field logs, and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an
analysis of the main motorized routes within the area in 2009. The results of the route
analysis are documented in the road analysis forms contained in the wilderness evaluation
file.
This inventory unit is bounded on the east by private lands, on the southeast by County
Road 3-14, on the southwest by County Road 3-14A, on the west by BLM Road 7132-00,
and on the north by an unnumbered BPA access road (see Maps 1 and 2, road analysis
forms, photos, photo logs, and BLM ID team minutes in the wilderness inventory file for
additional supporting information regarding these boundary determinations).
The process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is contained in the
document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area,
BLM, and the ID team meeting notes contained in the wilderness inventory file.
In 1980, this area was considered as part of the larger Wakefield Cabin (1-118) inventory
unit. Currently, it is separated from this unit by BLM Road 7132-00 (Map 2). The
inventory unit currently contains about 2,479 acres of BLM-administered land.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The inventory unit is located about 8 miles southwest of Adel, Oregon (see Maps 1 and
2).
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory identified the larger Wakefield Cabin
unit as containing 25 miles of primitive vehicle ways, 15 man-made reservoirs, and
pasture fences within the unit. The reservoirs were described as “substantially
noticeable”. Thirteen miles of fence were found to be “substantially noticeable” while
other fences passing through juniper areas were less noticeable. The inventory noted that
the 500-Kv BPA power line along the eastern boundary was a dominant man-made
feature visible over a vast majority of the unit. Based on the number of intrusions found
and their scattered distribution, the unit was not found to be in a natural condition where
it is primarily affected by the forces of nature.
2
Current Condition Description: The current unit does not meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria due to it being split off from former
unit 1-118 by BLM Road 7132-00. For this reason, the current natural character of the
unit was not evaluated.
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the larger Wakefield Cabin unit
was identified as a large, low-sage flat which offered practically no opportunity for
solitude.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for solitude were not evaluated.
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, the larger Wakefield Cabin unit was
found to offer some opportunities for primitive recreation in the Deep Creek area and in
the southwest portion, but these opportunities were limited to a small area and were not
outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No _____
NA _X_
1980 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, archaeological values were identified
as a potential value in the larger Wakefield Cabin unit, though none had actually been
documented at that point in time.
Current Condition Description: The unit does not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the supplemental
values were not evaluated.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Wakefield Cabin SouthOR-OI5-118D
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
Yes lNo
No]LNA
Yes
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
_Yes _ No l
NA
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
Yes
No lNA
Conclusion (Check One):
_ _ The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
X
The area does not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Names and Titles):
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna 0'Connor
Vernon Stofleth
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Wildlife Biologist
Approved by:
~~
&/tzor
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
Date
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFR parts 4 or 161 0.5-2.
4
Year: 2009
Inventory Unit Number/Name: OR-015-119/South Warner Rim
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_
a) Inventory Source: _Wilderness Proposed Initial Inventory: Roadless Areas
and Islands Which Clearly Do Not Have Wilderness Characteristics, Oregon and
Washington, April 1979__
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):_South Warner Rim/1-119
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Proposed Initial Inventory, Roadless Areas and Islands
Which Clearly Do Not Have Wilderness Characteristics, April 1979_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area,
Lakeview, Oregon_
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
BLM
Private
9,600
160
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
N
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
N
N
Unknown
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY
CONDITIONS
a. Unit Number/Name: OR-015-119/South Warner Rim
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes __X__
No _____
Boundary Determination: In 2008, BLM conducted field inventory of the area to update
its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo documentation of the
boundary routes and some of the interior routes. Using both ONDA and BLM photos,
field logs, and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an
analysis of the main motorized routes within the area in 2009.
The results of the route analysis are documented in the road analysis forms contained in
the wilderness evaluation file. On the west, the unit is bounded by the Bonneville Power
Association (BPA) power line right-of-way (750 feet from centerline). On the south, the
unit is bounded by private lands. On the east, the unit is bounded by a combination of
private lands and County Road 3-14. On the north, the unit is bounded by a combination
of private lands and the Highway 140 right-of-way (150 feet from centerline) (see Maps 1
and 2, road analysis forms, photos, photo logs, and BLM ID team minutes in the
wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information regarding these boundary
determinations). The inventory unit currently contains about 10,403 acres of BLMadministered land and about 160 acres of private land inholdings located near the north
central boundary of the unit (Map 2).
Following the boundary determination, the BLM ID team subsequently examined the
previous inventory information contained in the BLM’s wilderness inventory files and
published inventory documents, and its own recent field inventory information, and then
conducted an inter-disciplinary evaluation of the current wilderness characteristics within
the unit boundary. The results are contained in the following section. Additional
background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is
contained in the ID team meeting notes and the document, Wilderness Inventory
Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area, BLM. Both documents are
contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The inventory unit is located about 2 miles southwest of Adel, Oregon (Map 1). This unit
is roughly triangular-shaped and is about 7 miles long and 4.5 miles wide. Topography
varies across the unit. About half of the unit (central portion) is located on a high plateau
(South Warner Rim) that consists of a large, low sagebrush-covered flat. Broken upland
and rims occur on the south. The north and east portions of the unit consist of steep rim
faces descending downward to private lands or highway right-of-way. Dominant
2
vegetation includes sagebrush with western juniper in portions of the unit. The 500-Kv
BPA power line, just outside the western boundary, remains a dominant man-made
feature visible from a majority of the unit.
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes __X___ No __ __
N/A _____
1979 Unit Description: The previous inventory identified several gravel quarries in the
north part of the unit. The west portion of the unit was dominated by the 500-Kv BPA
power line. The impacts of man’s activities were found to be dominant within the
majority of the unit and thus, the unit was not found to be in a natural condition where it
is primarily affected by the forces of nature.
Current Condition Description: The area topography and vegetation have changed
little since 1979. However, the previous inventory did not recognize the presence of the
370-acre Grain Camp crested wheatgrass seeding, completed in 1960, in the northeast
corner of unit. In addition, western juniper has expanded across the unit (Map 3) since
1979. Two small wildfires occurred along the southeast boundary of the unit in 1985
and 1986 (about 535 acres total) and were allowed to revegetate naturally.
There are currently 7 constructed waterholes and reservoirs, 1 developed spring system,
and approximately 19.8 miles of pasture division fence within the unit. Currently, there
are approximately 8.6 miles of primitive routes within the unit. There is also 1
temporary wind testing tower located east of Lucky Reservoir. Most of these
developments/disturbances are scattered all across the unit (Map 2). Disturbances in the
northern third of the unit may be substantially noticeable from short distances, but are
much less noticeable from further distances due to the presence of screening.
Disturbances in the southern two-thirds of the unit are substantially noticeable for much
longer distances due to the flat terrain and lack of screening (see photos and photo log).
The total man-made disturbances present today within the unit are higher than those
documented in 1979 and cumulatively detract from the natural quality of the area.
However, the BPA power line is currently located outside the unit boundary and should
not be a factor in determining naturalness. For this reason, the ID team determined that
overall, the unit currently meets the naturalness criteria.
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No __X__
N/A _____
1979 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the opportunity for solitude
across the majority of the unit was found to be compromised by the lack of screening and
activities on contiguous private lands to the east. Solitude opportunities were not
outstanding.
3
Current Condition Description: About half of the unit consists of a broad expanse of
flat tableland terrain dominated by low-growing vegetation where it is difficult to avoid
the presence of others (see photos and photo log). Though juniper density has increased
within the unit, this has primarily occurred in the northern third of the unit (see Map 3).
The north portion of the unit contains some topography and juniper vegetation that
provides some screening and associated opportunity to avoid others. Though there is
some juniper present on the steep faces of South Warner Rim and Deep Creek Canyon on
the north and east boundaries of the unit, these portions of the unit are very exposed to
adjacent main highways and private lands. It is very difficult to avoid the presence of
others in these portions of the unit.
The 8.6 miles of existing primitive motorized routes extending into the unit increases the
likelyhood of encountering others within the interior of the unit. Further, the BPA power
line, though just outside the western boundary, remains a dominant man-made feature
negatively affecting solitude due to its visibility from a majority of the unit.
The unit lies underneath airspace designated at the Hart South Military Operation Area
(MOA). Jet fighters frequently fly over the area during training missions causing
noticeable and/or loud noise intrusions into the unit. Though the MOA is outside BLM’s
regulatory or management authority and, in and of itself, does not preclude the area from
meeting the solitude criteria, the aircraft noise does have an adverse impact on the
opportunity for solitude within the unit.
Across the unit as a whole, the screening provided by the existing topography and
vegetation has not changed substantially since 1979. This opportunity is limited in
extent. For these reasons, the ID team determined that the opportunities for solitude
have not changed substantially since 1979 and are not outstanding.
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No __X__
N/A _____
1979 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the opportunity for primitive
recreation across the majority of the unit was found to be compromised by activities on
contiguous private lands to the east. Opportunities were not outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The unit currently provides some opportunity for
fishing, hunting, and dispersed camping. The Lakeview RMP/ROD (Map R-7) shows the
entire unit is open to off-highway vehicle (OHV) use. The 8.6 miles of existing primitive
motorized routes within the interior of the unit also encourages motorized use within the
unit and further limits the opportunities for a primitive (non-motorized) and unconfined
recreation experience. The unit may offer some limited potential for other types of
primitive recreation (hiking/backpacking). However, all of these opportunities are
similar to those available throughout much of the surrounding Lakeview Resource Area.
4
For these reasons, the ID team found that the primitive recreational opportunities have
not changed substantially since 1979. The unit does not offer any single outstanding
primitive and unconfined recreational opportunity, nor does it offer an outstanding
diversity of recreational opportunities.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No ____
NA _X_
1979 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, supplemental values were not
addressed.
Description: Supplemental values were not evaluated during the current inventory as the
unit did not meet all of required wilderness character criteria described above.
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: South Warner Rim/OR-015-119_
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
_X_Yes ___No
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
_X_Yes ___No
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or primitive and
unconfined types of recreation?
____Yes __X_ No
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
____Yes __No __X_NA
Conclusion (Check One):
___ The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
_X__The area does not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Name and Title)
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna O’Connor
Vernon Stofleth
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Wildlife Biologist
5
Approved by:
~
~
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
t0M
Date
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
6
Year: 2009
Northwest
Inventory Unit Number/Name: OR-015-119B/South Warner Rim
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_
a) Inventory Source: _Wilderness Proposed Initial Inventory: Roadless Areas
and Islands Which Clearly Do Not Have Wilderness Characteristics, Oregon and
Washington, April 1979__
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):_South Warner Rim/1-119
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Proposed Initial Inventory, Roadless Areas and Islands
Which Clearly Do Not Have Wilderness Characteristics, April 1979_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area,
Lakeview, Oregon_
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
BLM
Private
9,600
160
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
N
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
N
N
Unknown
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY
CONDITIONS
a. Unit Number/Name: OR-015-119B/South Warner Rim Northwest
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes ____
No __X__
Boundary Determination: In 2008, BLM conducted field inventory of the area to update
its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo documentation of the
boundary routes and some of the interior routes. Using both ONDA and BLM photos,
field logs, and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an
analysis of the main motorized routes within the area in 2009.
The results of the route analysis are documented in the road analysis forms contained in
the wilderness evaluation file. On the west, the unit is bounded by the Bonneville Power
Association (BPA) power line right-of-way (750 feet from centerline). On the southeast,
the unit is bounded by BLM Road 7112-00 and private lands. On the north, the unit is
bounded by a combination of private lands and the Highway 140 right-of-way (150 feet
from centerline) (see Maps 1 and 2, road analysis forms, photos, photo logs, and BLM ID
team minutes in the wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information
regarding these boundary determinations).
In 1979, this area was considered as part of the larger South Warner Rim unit (1-119).
Currently, this unit is separated from the South Warner Rim unit by BLM Road 7122-00.
The inventory unit currently contains about 1,553 acres of BLM-administered lands (Map
2).
Additional background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this
evaluation is contained in the ID team meeting notes and the document, Wilderness
Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area, BLM. Both documents
are contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The inventory unit is located about 3.5 miles west of Adel, Oregon, and is triangular in
shape (Map 1).
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes _____
No __ __
N/A __X___
1979 Unit Description: The previous inventory identified several gravel quarries in the
very north part of the unit 1-119. The west portion of the unit was dominated by the 500-
2
Kv BPA power line. The impacts of man’s activities were found to be dominant within
the majority of the unit and thus, the unit was not found to be in a natural condition where
it is primarily affected by the forces of nature.
Current Condition Description: The current unit has been split from former unit 1-119
by BLM Road 7122-00 and does not currently meet the minimum size criteria or any of
the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current natural character of the unit
was not evaluated.
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No ____
N/A __X___
1979 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the opportunity for solitude
across the majority of former unit 1-119 was found to be compromised by the lack of
screening and activities on contiguous private lands to the east. Solitude opportunities
were not outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The current unit does not currently meet the minimum
size criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for solitude were not evaluated.
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1979 Unit Description: During the previous inventory, the opportunity for primitive
recreation across the majority of former unit 1-119 was found to be compromised by
activities on contiguous private lands to the east. Opportunities were not outstanding.
Current Condition Description: The current unit does not currently meet the minimum
size criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No ____
NA _X_
1979 Unit Description: In the previous inventory, supplemental values were not
addressed.
Description: Supplemental values were not evaluated during the current inventory as the
unit did not meet the size criteria, as described above.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: South Warner Rim NorthwestJOR-015-ll9B
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
Yes
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
Yes
---.X.-No
NolNA
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or primitive and
unconfined types of recreation?
Yes
No lNA
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
Yes
NolNA
Conclusion (Check One):
_
The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
---.X.-The area does not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Name and Title)
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna O'Connor
Vernon Stofleth
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Wildlife Biologist
Approved by:
Ir4.--
4Mf"
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
Date
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFR parts 4 or 1610.5-2.
,.
4
Year: 2009
Inventory Unit Number/Name: Unnumbered Units/South Warner Area
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY
FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of
this area?
No
Yes _X_ (if more than one unit is within the area, list the names/numbers
of those units.)
a) Inventory Source: Wilderness Inventory: Oregon and Washington Final
Intensive Inventory Decisions, November 1980
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s):__Unnumbered
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s):_U.S. Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land
Management Oregon: Intensive Wilderness Inventory Final Decisions,
November, 1980_
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s):_Lakeview District, Lakeview Resource Area
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record:
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit and answer each question
individually for each inventory unit):
Ownership
Size
(historic
acres)
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
BLM
Private
< 5,000
0
NA
Outstanding Outstanding Supplemental
Solitude?
Primitive & Values?
Y/N
Unconfined Y/N
Recreation?
Y/N
NA
NA
NA
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY
CONDITIONS
Unit Number/Name: Unnumbered Units/South Warner Area
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size?
Yes ____
No __X___
Boundary Determination: In the summer of 2008, members of the BLM staff conducted
field inventory to update its road and wilderness inventories for this area. This field work
included photo documentation of the boundary and some interior routes and a reevaluation of wilderness characteristics within the area. Using BLM photos, field logs,
and staff field knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed road analyses
on the main routes within the inventory area. The results of the route analysis are
documented in the road analysis forms and ID team meeting notes contained in the
wilderness evaluation file.
The ID team determined that County Roads 3-14, 3-14A, portions of 3-14B, 3-14C, FS
Roads 3910-019, 3915, and 3915-160, BLM Road 7112-00, an unnumbered road, and
private lands formed a number of inventory unit boundaries in the area (Map 2). On the
basis of these boundary determinations, the BLM ID team found 8 small units (each less
than 5,000 acres) of BLM-administered lands.
The process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is contained in the
document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource Area,
BLM, and the ID team meeting notes contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS
The eight units are located approximately 10 miles southwest of Adel, to the southwest of
Warner Valley (Maps 1 and 2).
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory determined that the unnumbered units in
this area did not meet the minimum size criteria and did not evaluate them further for
other wilderness characteristics.
Current Condition Description: These 8 units do not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current natural
character of these units was not evaluated.
2
(3) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for solitude?
Yes_____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory determined that the units in this area did
not meet the minimum size criteria and did not evaluate them further for other wilderness
characteristics.
Current Condition Description: These 8 units do not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for solitude were not evaluated.
(4) Does the unit have outstanding opportunities for primitive and unconfined
recreation?
Yes _____
No ____
N/A __X___
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory determined that the units in this area did
not meet the minimum size criteria and did not evaluate them further for other wilderness
characteristics.
Current Condition Description: These 8 units do not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the current
opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values?
Yes _____
No _____
NA _X_
1980 Unit Description: The previous inventory determined that the units in this area did
not meet the minimum size criteria and did not evaluate them further for other wilderness
characteristics.
Current Condition Description: These 7 units do not currently meet the minimum size
criteria or any of the exceptions to the size criteria. For this reason, the supplemental
values were not evaluated.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: UnnamediUnnumberedUnits
Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
Yes lNo
No]LNA
Yes
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
Yes _ No lNA
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
Yes
No lNA
Conclusion (Check One):
_ _ The area-or a portion of the area-has wilderness character.
X
The areas do not have wilderness character.
ID Team Members (Names and Titles):
Todd Forbes
Theresa Romasko
Paul Whitman
Les Boothe
Glenn Lorton
Breanna O'Connor
Vernon Stofleth
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Associate Field Manager Natural Resources
Planning & Environmental Coordinator
Range Management Specialist
Wildlife Biologist
Recreation Technician
Wildlife Biologist
Approved by:
,;Lc~
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
.Date
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It
does not represent a formal land use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative
remedies under either 43 CFR parts 4 or 1610.5-2.
4
Map 1 - Wilderness Character Evaluation Area
Lake County
Fort Rock
Christmas Valley
Silver Lake
Alkali Lake
Summer Lake
Legend
Lake County
Harney County
Lakeview Resource Area
Lake County
Klamath County
Paisley
Major Utility Corridors
Cities
Major Roads
Wilderness Character Evaluation Area
0
Valley Falls
4
8
16 Miles
Plush
Lakeview
Adel
Westside
New Pine Creek
No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,
reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with
other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This information
may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed
through digital means and may be updated without notification .
39
10
39
5
3910147
-A
4
31
TY
N
C
CNT
Y 314
3-1 4
CNTY
71 32 -00
71
32
-B
0
C
CNTY 3-14 NTY 3-1 4
CNTY 3-14
61
72
-00
4
TY
6172-E 0
CNTY 3-14
CN
00
71 22 -00
71
22
-
4
31
TY
CN
0
0
711
2-0
0
711
2-0
CNTY 314
61 7
2
31
71 32 -00
-00
71 32
-00
7132 -00
9
39 15 0
3
CNTY 3-14
E0
39 15
00 0
7122-A0
00
-C 0
71 3
2
7132-C0
13 6
39 1
5
39
15
02
3
3915 000
0
39
15
02
2
39
15
02
4
71
22
-
-C0
71 32
391015 8
39
10
16
4
39
10
16
9
3910195
39 15 25
39
15
29
8
391502 4
00
0
72
61
39
15
18
8
72
61
71
12
-0
OR-015-0000
CNTY 3-14
or
orrid
18 5
39 15
0
00
15
39
C
4
3-1
71
12
-0
c
BPA
C
-1 4
Y3
NT
Y
NT
or
orrid
0
-0
12
71
4B
39
15
18
3
39
15
18
2
00
-E 0
4A
OR-015-0000
Ac
BP
1
3-
OR-015-0000
OR-015-0000
61
72
-
2
61 7
TY
0
1
3-
1
19
15
39
6172-00
-00
71
22
-00
OR-015-0000OR-015-118D
C
-1 4
Y3
NT
TY
3-1
5
2
61 7
71 22 -00
C
4A
TY
4
CNTY 3-14
7122-00
CNTY 314C
31
0
81 02 -0
TY
391518 7
U.S. Forest Service
NT
Y
CN
4
03
15
39
Bureau of Land Management
8
Private
or Company
01Individual
9 15
3State
Agency
4A
C
CN
WATER TROUGH
0
22 WATERHOLE
15
39
WELL
Land Status (Oregon)
31
4A
3-1
TY
20 3
STORAGE TANK
Fish Creek Rim WSA
TY
OR-015-0000
5
39 1
39 15 2
0
RESERVOIR
Campsites
N
02 6
DEVELOPED SPRING
Fences
C
5
39 1
<all other values>
14A
CNTY 3-
CN
0
00
15
39
1
5 02 1
21 39 1
15
39
Major Utility Corridors
Motorized Routes
TY
3-1
4A
71 32 -00
39
15
00
0
Inventory Unit Boundaries
Major Roads
CN
OR-015-0000
02 4
39 15
Legend
4A
OR-015-118C
71 32 -00
0
00
15
39
N
1
3-
71 22 -00
A0
0
00
15
39
39 15 23 3
0
5 00
40 1
C
TY
4A
Y 3-1
CNT
8
30
15
39
14 5
39 15
391525 6
15 5
39
15
15
2
N
1
3-
-B 0
00
32
71
391513 4
OR-015-0000
39 1
5
OR-015-119
2
71 3
32
71
391501 5
-C 0
-00
CN
A0
C
71 22 -00
2
71 3
71 32 -B 0
-00
71
22
-
71 22 -00
03 4
0
2
10 39 15 01
11
40
40
15
01
8
0
0
39 1
39 15 01 5
2
71 3
1
30
15
39
4
5 30
39 1
39 15
00 0
0
-00
22
71
C
1
19
10
39
-C
71 32
71 3
2
-00
22
71
-00
22
71
C0
OR-015-118
7132-00 7132-00
OR-015-119B
BPA Corrido r
71
32
-
32
71
3910 159
3915 228
0
2
71 4
BPA corrido r
9
3
17
10
39
15 9
4
03
10
0
00
39
10
39
39 10 01
7
5 02
39 1
01 6
39 15
Fish Creek Rim WSA
1 4 2-0
Old 7
-00
OR-015-118B
OR-015-0000
1
16 7
39 10
6
39 10 1
19 7
0
71 42 -0
-00
391004 8
0
39 1
391000 0
39 1
0
5
81 3
5
39
10
39
7
23
10
39
0
00
10
39
42
71
39 10 22 5
39 5
39 10
39 10
15 6
00
Old 7142-00
-00
CNT
Y 3-1
3
5
81 3
71
52
-
39 10 04 7
39
10
03
9
71
42
-
00
CNTY 3-1 3
39 10 39 5
391014 9
2
71 4
0
-0
Map 2 - Wilderness Character Inventory Units - South Warner Rim Area
0
0.4
0.8
1.6 Miles
No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,
reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate
use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources.
This information may not meet National M ap Accuracy Standards. This
product was developed through digital means and may be updated without
notification.
OR-015-118
OR-015-119
Legend
Evaluation Area
Woodland Density Class
High
Medium
Low
0
1
Map 3 - Vegetative Screening Based on Woodland Density Classes
2
4 Miles