٢ﻉ،١٥ﻡ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺩﻳﺎﺏ – : ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ Tall Structure Flat Structure ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ – – ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻓﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ Flat Structure ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ Job Analysis and Description ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻱ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﺃﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ:ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ﻣﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﻣﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻬﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﺷـﺒﺎﻉ ﺣﺎﺟـﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺎﻏﻠﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ feedback ﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﲔ ﻭﺍﻻﺱ،ﺃﻧﺪﺭﻭﺳﻴﺰﻻﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻣﺮﺗﺪﺓ :ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ FEED BACK FEED BACK :ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ :ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ :ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﻡ :ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻣﺮﺗﺪﺓ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ :ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻲ ﻟﺘﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﺍﻟـﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ- ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﻭﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ،ﺍﻹﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ (٢ ) ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﻣﺪﱐ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻹﻏﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ :ﺃﻭﻻﹰ :ﺎﺛﺎﻧﻴ • • • • ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ:ﺛﺎﻟﺜﹰﺎ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳍﻴﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﺻﺪﻳﻖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻔﻴﻔﻲ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻜﲔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﻜﻢ ﺍﳍﻴﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﺳـﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭﻳﺔ، ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻭﻧـﺔ،ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﻧﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ (ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ )ﺍﳋﺮﺍﺋﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻫﻴﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ (٥ ) ﻃﺮﻕ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﺋﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳍﺮﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺳﻴﺔ-١ – ﲨﻴﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳍﺮﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻘﻴﺔ-٢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻄﻴﻠﺔ-٣ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻠﺲﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﻤﺔ-٤ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﻤﺔ-٥ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ-١ ﺟﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥ ﻭﺯﻣﻼﺅﻩ٦ ﺣﺴﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺮﰊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ- ٢ (٨ ) ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺑﲑﻧﺰﻭﺳﺘﻮﻛﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ- ﺃ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﻴﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻱ Tom Burns and G. M. Stalker, “The Management of Innovation”, London: Tavistock 1961 . ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﻴﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻟﻮﺭﻧﺲ ﻭﻟﻮﺭﺵ-ﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ-٣ ﺑـﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴـﺔ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﲟﻮﺟﺒﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﳋﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻮﻳﻠﻴﺔ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻼﺕ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺮﺟﺎﺕ ، ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺼـﻠﺔ ﳌـﺪﻯ ﻃﻮﻳـﻞ،ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ (9) Paul R. Lawrence and Jay W. Lorsch, “Organization and Environment”, Homewood, III, Richard Irvin, 1969. (10) James D. Thompson, “Organizations in Action”, New York: MacGraw Hill, 1967, p.20. ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔﻭﺍﳌﻜﺜﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻜﺜﻔﺔ Woodward) (11) Joan Woodward, “Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, London, Oxford, 1965. ﻧﻄﺎﻕ ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ-٤ ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﺔ • • • • ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺴﻄﺔ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﺗﻌﻘﺪﻩ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺘﺖ ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﰲ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻬﺪﻓﺔ ﻟﻶﺭﺍﺀ ﺻﺪﻳﻖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻔﻴﻔﻲ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ – ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﺔ: ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ: ﺎﺛﺎﻧﻴ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﶈﻠﻴﺔ: ﺛﺎﻟﺜﹰﺎ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻲ ﻋﺴﺎﻑ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﳌﻌﻄﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺴﺎﻑ ﺇﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺳـﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺗﺘﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻤﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ (15) C. N. Parkinson, “Parkinson Law and other Studies in Administration”, Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1957. ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ: ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ،ﺍﻟﻌﺴﺎﻑ –ﲨﻴﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ،ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﳏﻤﺪﺣﺮﰊ ﺟﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥ ﻭﺯﻣﻼﺅﻩ ﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﲔ، ﻭﺍﻻﺱ، ﺃﻧﺪﺭﻭ،ﺳﻴﺰﻻﰲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ،ﻋﺴﺎﻑ ﺻﺪﻳﻖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ،ﻋﻔﻴﻔﻲ ﻣﺪﱐ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ،ﻋﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻹﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ: ﺎﺛﺎﻧﻴ Burns, Tom and G. M. Stalker, “The Management of Innovation”, London: Tavistock 1961. Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch, “Organization and Environment”, Homewood, III, Richard Irvin, 1969. Parkinson, C. N. “Parkinson’s Law and Other Studies in Administration”, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957. Thompson, James D. ,“Organizations in Action”, New York: MacGraw Hill, 1967. Wanous, J. P., “Installing A Realistic Job Preview: Ten Tough Choices”, Personnel Psychology, 1989, 42, pp.117-134. Woodward, Joan, “Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice”, London, Oxford, 1965. ﺟﺮﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﳍﻴﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻬﺪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺴﲎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﺼـﻮﻝ٣٢ ﺹ، ﻫـ١٤١٥ ، ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ، ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ/ ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ: ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ ﻫـ١٤١٨ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻌﺪﺓ١٢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ – ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ The Relationship between Job Design and the Shape of Organizational Structure ABDUL HAMID AHMED DIYAB Associate Professor Department of Business Administration Faculty of Economics and Administration King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT. This research is an attempt to make a correlation between job design and the shape of the organizational hierarchy. As a result of the method which is being adopted in designing jobs, two major hierarchies may result: Tall organizational structures and Flat organizational structures. Tall structures are those that can bc classified as having more organizational levels and narrow span of control. These types of structures are suitable for technical, simple nature jobs. Flat structures are those which can be characterized as having less organizational levels with wide span of control. These structures are suitable for diversified, more complex jobs. In addition to the effect of job design on organizational hierarchy, many other factors have also been introduced. These include size, technology, and organizational culture, which are proved to have an effect on shaping the organizational hierarchy.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz