OCA-USPS-T38-1-7.pdf

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Postal Rate and Fee Changes,
2001
0FcEtvc-D
Docket No. R2001-1
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
INTERROGATORIES
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS KIRK T. KANEER
(OCAIUSPS-T38-1-7)
November 14,200l
Pursuant
Commission,
requests
to Rules 25 through
28 of the Rules of Practice
the Office of the Consumer
for production
OCA/USPS-1-21
of documents.
dated September
Advocate
Instructions
hereby submits interrogatories
included
submitted,
SHELLEY S. DREIFUSS
Acting Director
Office of the Consumer Advocate
EMMETT RAND COSTICH
Attorney
1333 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
(202) 789-6830; Fax (202) 789-6819
and
with OCA interrogatories
28, 2001, are hereby incorporated
Respectfully
of the Postal Rate
by reference.
Docket No. R2001-1
OCAAJSPS-T38-1.
a.
-2.
Please refer to your testimony at page 4, lines 18-l 9.
Please confirm that the “Erent” values developed
conjunction
by witness Yezer are used, in
with the Docket No. MC96-3 post office box classification
to develop more cost homogeneous
fee groups in this proceeding.
schedule,
If you do not
confirm, please explain.
b.
Please confirm that the “Erent” values developed
by witness Yezer are used to
distribute the category of test year before rates (TYBR) attributable
box costs known as Space Provision, which includes contingency,
estimate of costs associated
post otTice
less an
with Caller Service and Reserve Numbers.
If you
do not confirm, please explain.
C.
Are the “Erent” values developed
by witness Yezer used in any additional way,
other than identified in parts a. and b. above, in the development
for post office box service in this proceeding.
OCAAJSPS-T38-2.
a.
of your proposal
Please explain.
Please refer to your testimony at page 8, Figure 1.
Please confirm that Figure 1 is not the same SAS frequency
Docket No. R2000-1,
USPS-LR-I-155
chart shown
at page 37, revised March 31, 2000.
in
If you
do not confirm, please explain.
b.
Please confirm that Figure 1 is not the same SAS frequency
Docket
No. R2000-1,
USPS-LR-I-155
example,
the frequency
frequency
in USPS-LR-I-155
please explain.
at page
of the 8.8 column
chart shown
37, as originally
filed.
in
For
in Figure 1 is less than the same
at page 37, as originally filed. If you do not confirm,
Docket No. R2001-1
C.
-3-
Please provide the correct SAS frequency
Please refer to your testimony at page 8, Figure 1.
OCAkJSPS-T38-3.
a.
chart for Figure 1.
Please confirm that Figure 1 does not include negative “Erent” values.
If you do
not confirm, please explain and provide Figure 1 that includes negative
“Erent”
values.
b.
Please
provide
the number
of negative
“Erent”
values developed
by witness
Yezer.
C.
Please explain how the negative “Erent” values were used in, and affected the
development
of, your
0
post office box classification
ii)
the distribution
OCANSPS-T38-4.
R2000-1,
schedule, and
of TYBR Space Provision costs.
Please refer to your testimony
at 539, the Commission
schedule
b.
in this area.”
Please confirm that the “Erent” values developed
be periodically
updated
reflects costs.
so as to ensure
by witness Yezer will have to
that the post office box classification
If you do not confirm, please explain.
Please explain how, and provide a schedule
to update the data used by witness
obtain comparable
In PRC Op.
,states, “the Service indicates that it will be updating
data over time as part of its ongoing reappraisal
a.
at page 4, lines 18-19.
of when, the Postal Service intends
Yezer in developing
data to prepare new “Erent” values.
his “Erent” values, or
Docket No. R2001-1
C.
-4.
Please explain how the Postal Service intends to eliminate
the negative “Erent’
values as part of its update of the data.
d.
Please
explain
incorporate
included
how the Postal Service
the addition
intends
of new post offices,
in the data used by witness
to update
include
the data so as to
existing
Yezer, and incorporate
post offices
not
new information
related to existing post offices.
e.
Please explain how the Postal Service intends to update the data so as to ensure
that the data reflects the correct number of boxes installed.
OCANSPS-T38-5.
Please refer to your testimony
discuss the options under consideration
at page 15, lines 9-11. Please
by the Postal Service “to compile post office
box data that could be used to discern price effects on box use.”
OCAkJSPS-T38-6.
Please refer to your testimony
at pages 15 and 16, lines 12-23, and
Please confirm that the “revenue adjustment
factor of 93.2 percent” is not derived
Kline 1 ,.respectively.
a.
from an estimate of population
growth, or the size of the population.
If you do not
confirm, please explain.
b.
Please
provide
population
number
installed,
the following
data for the past 5 years:
growth for individuals
the annual
rate of
over age 22, the annual rate of growth in the
of boxes in use, the annual
rate of growth
in the number
of boxes
and the annual rate of growth in the number of postal facilities having
post office boxes.
-5.
Docket No. R2001-1
OCAAJSPS-T38-7.
Please
refer to your testimony
at page
19, lines 1-3.
confirm that the Postal Service intends to collect data on the distribution
ZIP Codes.
of box sizes by
If you do not confirm, please explain.
CERTIFICATE
I hereby
participants
Please
OF SERVICE
certify that I have this date served the foregoing
of record
in this proceeding
practice.
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
November 14.2001
in accordance
document
upon all
with Rule 12 of the rules of