November 16, 2010
FINAL REPORT
Evaluation Study of
Prince William County’s
Illegal Immigration Enforcement Policy
www.virginia.edu/surveys
Project team
• Tom Guterbock,, Director,, Center for Surveyy Research,,
UVa
• Chris Koper, Director of Research, PERF
• Karen Walker, Child Trends (formerly Research Prof. of
Psychology, UVa)
• Milton Vickerman,
Vickerman Assoc.
Assoc Prof
Prof. of Sociology,
Sociology UVa.
UVa
• Bruce Taylor, NORC (formerly Dir. of Research, PERF)
• Tim Carter,, Prof. of Sociology,
gy, JMU
• Nicole Fedoravicius & graduate assistants, UVa
UVa CSR & PERF
2
Many thanks to:
• The Board of Countyy Supervisors
p
• Chief Charlie T. Deane
• PWCPD senior staff
– Tom Pulaski, Police Department Project Manager
• CXO and senior County staff
• PWCPD officers
ffi
who
h responded
d d tto our questions
ti
andd
interviews
• Our respondents
p
and informants in the communityy
Views expressed here are those of the authors.
UVa CSR & PERF
Overview
•
•
•
•
Background & history
Goals & limitations of the evaluation
Data sources
The policy’s goals
– and possible consequences
• Have these goals been met?
– Our findings, with summaries of key supportive data
• Overall summary of findings
UVa CSR & PERF
4
Background and history
• July 2007: BOCS passes initial resolution regarding
immigration
• October 2007: BOCS passes original Immigration Policy
– BOCS determines outside evaluation of policy is needed
– BOCS includes
i l d funding
f di for
f outside
id evaluation
l i
•
•
•
•
•
•
BOCS modifies policy: April 2008
Modified ppolicyy is implemented:
p
Julyy 2008
Interim Report: August 2009
Report on 2009 Citizen Survey: September 2009
R
Report
on 2010 Citizen
Ci i
Survey:
S
September
S
b 2010
Final report release date: November 16, 2010
UVa CSR & PERF
5
The current policy:
“Officers
Officers shall investigate the citizenship or
immigration status of all persons who are arrested
for a violation of a state law or county ordinance
when such arrest results in a physical custodial
arrest.”
PWCPD General Order 45.01
Implementing BOCS resolution, April 2008
UVa CSR & PERF
Our task
• “Assess
Assess the effectiveness of the implementation of
the new general order with respect to community
outcomes, enforcement data, workload and the
prevention of racial profiling.”
--BOCS resolution, 10/16/2007
• “P
“Provide
id a multi-faceted
lif
d evaluation
l i off the
h
[County’s] Immigration Enforcement Policy and
its effects during a two year monitoring period
period.”
--Final project specifications
UVa CSR & PERF
7
Some limitations
• No solid baseline we can compare PWC with
– But some police data can be examined from earlier years
– Sharp breaks in trend lines are suggestive
• No “control
control group
group” or comparison County
– Immigration policies vary across nearby localities
– But we can compare patterns in PWC to other localities in the
region or to the rest of the metro area
region,
• Immigration status not recorded in most police records
– Not in other available data sources, either
– Only known for those checked by PWC police after March 2008
• Direct surveys of illegal immigrants not feasible
UVa CSR & PERF
8
More
o e limitations
tat o s
• Important and rapid changes in the environment
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Changing demographics in PWC
Decline in new construction in PWC
The mortgage crisis
General economic slowdown
National immigration policy in flux
Shifts in public opinion
St
Strong
media
di iinterest
t
t andd attention
tt ti
• Including recent media surge in summer 2010
• Therefore: Due care must be observed in attributing
changes
h
i the
in
th community
it to
t the
th County
C
t policy
li itself
it lf
– But some clear conclusions are possible when multiple data
sources are used
UVa CSR & PERF
9
Methods and data sources
Quantitative
&
Qualitative
UVa CSR & PERF
10
Quantitative data sources
• Collection of data from departmental records and systems
–
–
–
–
–
Crime
C
i reports
t [PWCPD,
[PWCPD UCR ddata,
t COG ddata,
t Crime
C i in
i Virginia]
Vi i i ]
Calls for service data from PWCPD
Field interview/observation cards
RMS ddata on arrests bby PWCPD
Neighborhood services, school data
• The annual PWC Citizen Survey, 1993-2010
– Including questions about the policy added in 2008 and 2009
• Surveys of police officers in Fall of 2008, 2009
• A survey of police departments in 46 localities throughout
the metropolitan region
more . . .
UVa CSR & PERF
11
More quantitative sources
• U. S. Census Bureau data
– Decennial census for all localities
– American Community Survey
• Yearly data for Prince William 2006 – 2009
• No data for Manassas or Manassas Park
– Public Use Micro Sample data from ACS
• Allows custom analysis on our choice of variables
– Home mortgage data from HMDA public files
• Counts mortgage applications from Hispanics, by census
tract
UVa CSR & PERF
12
Varying geography
• The evaluation draws on data from many sources
• Some data sources combine PWC with Manassas and
Manassas Park (“PWC + cities”)
– Others treat them separately
• Some crime data are available only for Virginia localities
– Others include DC, and Maryland localities in the metro DC data
We show whatever data are relevant, allowing
geography
h to vary bby data
d
source.
UVa CSR & PERF
13
Qualitative data sources
•
Focus groups
–
–
–
–
•
“K iinformant”
“Key
f
t” and
d stakeholder
t k h ld interviews
i t i
–
–
–
–
–
•
Police officers at various levels
Criminal Alien Unit
Adult detention center
Focus groups with Hispanic residents (September 2010)
County Board, County staff
Community groups on all sides
Immigrants
g
((through
g churches))
Business leaders
Semi-structured interviews with random respondents to citizen survey
• Hispanic respondents selected for follow-up, some in Spanish
Ob
Observation
ti
– At the jail
– “Ride-alongs” with patrol officers
UVa CSR & PERF
14
Studying a “hidden”
hidden population
• We don’t know which individuals are in the U.S. illegally
– But
B t we know
k
quite
it a bit about
b t illegals
ill l as a group
• PWC is a diverse county; many nationalities are
represented
– About 13% of all residents are non-citizens
– About 20% of all residents are Hispanic
• 50% of PWC Hispanics
p
are citizens;; 50% are not
– Non-citizens include those who are here illegally and legally
• 73% of PWC non-citizens are Hispanic
– 26% of these from Mexico,
Mexico 74% other countries
• Hispanic percent of PWC illegal immigrants is: ???
– But: most Hispanics in PWC are in the U.S. legally
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: US Census 2006 ACS
Background trends
UVa CSR & PERF
16
Growth in Hispanic
p
ppopulation
p
1990-2005
600,000
514 696
514,696
484,902
500,000
457,564
Population
n
400,000
451,947
300,000
224,786
200,000
215 124
215,124
62,749
100,000
27,338
9,662
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Year
PWC
UVa CSR & PERF
DC Metro
Metro minus PWC
Source: US Census & ACS
2010
Births to Hispanic Mothers in PWC by
Mother’s Country of Origin
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2000
Total Hispanic
UVa CSR & PERF
2001
Mexican
2002
2003
2004
Central or South American
2005
2006
Other and unknown Hispanic
Source: Virginia Dept. of Health
18
Home Purchase Loans to Hispanics:
Change Between 2000-2006
2000
2006
Source: CSR analysis of HMDA data files
Building Permits in PWC 2001
2001-2009
2009
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6 000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2001
2002
2003
Res. Bldg.
UVa CSR & PERF
2004
2005
Comm. Bldg.
2006
SF Bldg.
2007
2008
2009
Total Bldg.
Source: PWC Public Works
20
Residential Construction
Across Counties
8 000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5 000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2001
2002
2003
Arlington
UVa CSR & PERF
2004
Fairfax
2005
Loudoun
2006
2007
2008
Prince William
Source: UVa Weldon Cooper Center
21
PWC Employment in
Selected Industries
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Accomodations and Food Services
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
Construction
Other Services
UVa CSR & PERF
22
The mortgage boom and bust
Total mortgage applications by year
PWC + cities
35,000
29 751
29,751
30,000
25,888
25,000
18,766
20,000
15,000
21,532
20,162
16,448
All loans
13,498
11,281
10,000
5,000
0
2000
2001
UVa CSR & PERF
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Source: CSR analysis of HMDA data
23
Defining the goals of the policy
UVa CSR & PERF
24
What are the goals
of the County’s immigration policy?
1)) Improve
p
ppublic safety;
y;
2) Reduce the number of illegal immigrants in the county;
3) Save money by delivering fewer services to illegal
immigrants;
4) Reduce overcrowded housing and public disorder,
•
such as loitering at day labor sites and public intoxication;
5) Maintain PWCPD reputation for professionalism
•
And community confidence and trust in police;
6) Maintain County’s reputation as an inclusive community
•
Internally (PWC residents) and externally (elsewhere)
UVa CSR & PERF
25
Possible other consequences?
•
•
•
•
Overzealous ppolice enforcement?
Costly litigation?
Overburden PWCPD, unanticipated costs?
Create fear and a sense of being unwelcome among
immigrants in general?
• Cause
C
i
immigrants
i
t (including
(i l di legal
l l immigrants),
i
i
t ) or
Hispanics generally, to leave or avoid the county?
• Lower crime reporting?
p
g
– Resulting in greater victimization among immigrants?
• Capacity of jail, courts, ICE overwhelmed?
UVa CSR & PERF
26
Our Evaluation
How do the outcomes stack up against the
policy’s several goals?
UVa CSR & PERF
27
UVA PERF
UVA,
PERF, JMU conclude . . .
• The Prince William County illegal immigration
enforcement
f
policy:
li
• Was smoothly implemented by PWCPD and County
staff
• Had wide-ranging effects
• Some of these effects were those intended
• Some
S
off th
the policy’s
li ’ goals
l were nott achieved
hi d
• Had few of the unintended consequences that some had
feared
It IS possible for a local government to have an
impact on its illegal immigration experience.
UVa CSR & PERF
Smooth Implementation
by the Police Department
• PWCPD prepared carefully, consulted with legal counsel,
d l d training
developed
i i materials
i l
• Every officer trained before policy went into effect (Jan –
Feb 2008)
– 4,884 officer-hours devoted to this training
• Criminal Alien Unit created, trained in 287g program
g in the ppolicyy in Julyy 2008 eased the risk of racial
• Change
profiling complaints
– No lawsuits directly alleging racial profiling have been filed
– One lawsuit peripherally mentions racial profiling; court dismissed
those allegations
– Potential for other negative effects was lessened by this change
• All were re-trained for policy revision, May 2008
– 500 officer
officer-hours
hours
UVa CSR & PERF
29
2008 Officer Survey showed:
Effective training
Strongly Agree or
Agree
Statement
Currently, I believe it is clear how to implement the PWC
i
immigration
i
i policy.
li
83.9%
I believe I have enough knowledge about the current policy to enforce
this policy correctly.
85.0%
The training I have been provided by the PWPCD has adequately
prepared me to enforce the PWC immigration policy.
82 3%
82.3%
When appropriate, I have the necessary skills to ask immigration
status questions.
88.9%
I have the necessary skills to review identification (e.g., driver’s
license) for fakes.
78.5%
2009 re-survey of officers showed virtually identical results
results.
Source: Officer survey Fall 2008, N=379
PWCPD Community Outreach
• Board directed extensive community education
– Particularly with minority groups
• Nearly 200 meetings with community groups & media
– Many attended by Chief Deane and Senior Police Officials
• Meetings with over 300 County employees
• Pamphlets and media coverage, website info
– English and Spanish versions
• Emphasizing:
– Focus
F
on th
those who
h commit
it crimes
i
– Protection for crime victims and those who report crime
– No racial profiling
UVa CSR & PERF
31
Contacts with Suspected
Illegal Immigrants
• About 3,000 contacts March 2008 – June 2010
– Average of 107 contacts per month
• U
Under
d current policy,
li 83% off recorded
d d contacts
with illegal immigrants are through arrest
– July 2008 – June 2010
• 99% of suspected illegal immigrants were
confirmed to be illegal
UVa CSR & PERF
32
2009 Police Focus Groups
• Reports from all levels of department:
– The policy has become a routine part of police business
– Any extra burden on officers from executing policy seems to be
well accommodated
– Burden on senior staff has diminished from initial year of frantic
activity
• But immigration
g
issues still require
q
their frequent
q
attention
– Community relations seem to be improving over initial reaction
• Hispanics responding more positively to police
– No increased difficulty in recruiting minorities to PD and County
– Not sure if level of crime reporting has been affected
– CAU plays a useful, specialized role
UVa CSR & PERF
33
Continuing effort required:
Senior police staff views
• Trainingg effort
– Initial training, ongoing training, academy training
• Major effort was needed for increased community outreach
• Establishing new business processes
– Manual processes for internal reporting are labor intensive
• Example: Field Interview Cards
• Media incidents create surges in demand on senior staff
• Auditing of data, quality control, analysis, reporting
• Line officers spending extra time on arrests
IN SUM: Significant cumulative effect on PD resources
UVa CSR & PERF
34
PWC citizens view police
implementation of the policy
positively . . .
“How satisfied are you with the job the
Police Department is doing in carrying out
this policy?”
UVa CSR & PERF
35
Satisfaction: carrying out policy,
policy 2010
Ve ry
Dis s a tis fie d
13.3%
S o m e wha t
Dis s a tis fie d
10.7%
Ve ry
S a tis fie d
43.3%
S o m e wha
h t
S a tis fie d
32.7%
Asked of 1,392 respondents in 2010
Overall satisfaction:
76 0%
76.0%
UVa CSR & PERF
36
Satisfaction 2010: carrying out policy
How satisfied are you . . .
% of all asked
% of those
with opinion
Very satisfied
29.6
43.3
S
Somewhat
h satisfied
i fi d
22 3
22.3
32 7
32.7
Somewhat dissatisfied
7.3
10.7
Very dissatisfied
9.1
13.3
D li to
Decline
t rate/oppose
t /
the
th policy
li
44
4.4
No opinion/don’t know
26.9
Refused
0.4
Reasons for being very satisfied, 2010
Comments from 43% who were very # of responses
satisfied:
% of
cases
Illegal immigration causes problems
in the community
56
14.3
The policy is good/needed
138
35.0
The ppolicy’s
y enforcement is havingg
positive results
124
31 6
31.6
The police have been doing a good
j b off carrying
job
i out the
h policy.
li
129
32.8
44
11.3
Other, no opinion, not codable
Base: 492 respondents who explained why they were very satisfied
Reasons for beingg veryy dissatisfied, 2010
Comments from 13.3% who were very # of responses
dissatisfied:
% of
cases
The policy inadequately addresses
the problems of illegal immigration
2
1.5
The policy is bad
31
27.7
Results of enforcing the policy are
negative
10
85
8.5
Problems with enforcement
35
31.0
Police are unfair/racial profiling
23
20.7
Other no opinion
Other,
opinion, uncodable
24
21 3
21.3
Base: 125 respondents who explained why they were very dissatisfied
Did the number of
illegal immigrants
in the County decline?
Yes, although we cannot count illegal
immigrants directly – must use proxy data
UVa CSR & PERF
40
Hispanic growth leveled off
• From 2000 to 2006, PWC’s
PWC s Hispanic population
grew much more rapidly than the metro area’s
– PWC Hispanic population more than doubled in 6 years
– PWC accounted for all Hispanic growth in DC metro
region
• From 2006 to 2009, metro region Hispanic
population increased by 18.8%.
• From
F
2006 to 2009
2009, PWC’
PWC’s Hi
Hispanic
i population
l i
increased by only 3.6%.
UVa CSR & PERF
41
Hispanic growth in PWC & DC metro area
Hispanic Population Trend: PWC vs. DC Metro
700,000
600,000
Population
n
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Year
PWC
DC Metro
Metro minus PWC
Source: Decennial Census & ACS
UVa CSR & PERF
42
Young Hispanic Males
in DC Metropolitan Area
2006-2008
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2006
2007
20-24
Ages 20-29 decreased 4% in 2 years.
2008
25-29
Source: ACS
Young Hispanic Males in PWC
2006-2008
6,000
5,000
4 000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
,
0
2006
2007
20-24
2008
25-29
Ages 20-29 decreased 22% in 2 years.
Source: ACS
Births to Hispanic Mothers
2000-2008
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2000
2001
UVa CSR & PERF
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Arlington County
Fairfax County
Loudoun County
Prince William County
2008
Source: Virginia Dept. of Health
45
Births to Hispanic Mothers for
Selected Nearby Small Cities
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2006
Fairfax city
UVa CSR & PERF
2007
Falls Church city
Manassas city
2008
Manassas Park city
Source: Virginia Dept. of Health
46
Hispanic Enrollment in Public Schools
as Percent of Total Enrollment
SY02/03 – SY09/10
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
20022003
20032004
20042005
20052006
20062007
20072008
20082009
Arlington County
Fairfax County
Loudon County
Prince William County
20092010
UVa CSR & PERF
47
ESOL Student Enrollments
Growth in ESOL Population in PWC and Surrounding
Communities, 1999–2009
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
11,820
5,000
1,781
, 8
2,583
1999
2000
4,140
5,523
6,236
2002
2003
13,157
13,959
2007
2008
2009
9,831
8,312
10,000
13,404
2001
2004
2005
2006
Arlington
g
County
y
Fairfax County
y
Loudoun County
y
Prince William County
Alexandria City
Manassas City
Non-citizens among Hispanics
PWC + cities vs. rest of metro
Non Citizens
(among Hispanics)
Non-citizens include
both legal and
non-legal residents
60.0%
Perce
entage
50.0%
40.0%
PWC + cities
30.0%
%
Rest of DC metro
20.0%
10.0%
43.0%
50.3%
48.0%
37.7%
2005
2006
2007
2008
0 0%
0.0%
Year
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: CSR analysis of ACS PUMS data
49
Non-English speaking among Hispanics
PWC + cities vs. rest of metro
Low English Proficiency Population
(among Hispanics)
Combined
percent of
no English
and poor English
60.0%
Perce
entage
50.0%
40.0%
PWC + cities
30.0%
R
Rest
off DC metro
20.0%
10.0%
28.0%
33.2%
31.2%
21.7%
2005
2006
2007
2008
0 0%
0.0%
Year
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: CSR analysis of ACS PUMS data
50
Linguistically isolated among Hispanics
PWC + cities vs. rest of metro
Linguistic
g
Isolation
(among Hispanics)
Persons in HH
where no one
speaks English
60.0%
Perc
centage
50.0%
40.0%
PWC + cities
30.0%
Rest of DC metro
20.0%
10.0%
38.9%
42.2%
34.8%
27.7%
2005
2006
2007
2008
0.0%
Year
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: CSR analysis of ACS PUMS data
51
1-Jan-06
1-May-10
1
1-Apr-10
1-Mar-10
1-Jan-10
1-Feb-10
1-Dec-09
1-Oct-09
1-Nov-09
1-Sep-09
1-Aug-09
1-Jun-09
1-Jul-09
700
1-May-09
1
800
1-Mar-09
1-Apr-09
1-Feb-09
1-Jan-09
1-Nov-08
1-Dec-08
1-Oct-08
1-Aug-08
1-Sep-08
1-Jul-08
1-Jun-08
1-Apr-08
1
1-May-08
1-Mar-08
1-Jan-08
1-Feb-08
1-Dec-07
1-Nov-07
1-Sep-07
1-Oct-07
1-Aug-07
1-Jun-07
1-Jul-07
1-May-07
1
1-Apr-07
1-Feb-07
1-Mar-07
1-Jan-07
1-Nov-06
1-Dec-06
1-Oct-06
1-Sep-06
1-Jul-06
1-Aug-06
1-Jun-06
1-Apr-06
1
1-May-06
1-Mar-06
1000
1-Feb-06
Police use of ‘language line’
translation service (billed calls)
Calls for both Accounts
Sum of Billed Calls
900
Gap in data due
to change
g in
vendors
600
500
Lang Grouped
Other
Spanish
400
300
200
100
0
Bill Period Date
Source: monthly vendor billings to PD
Are there fewer illegal immigrants?
• YES, although we cannot count illegal immigrants directly
• Number of Hispanics in PWC stabilized
– But increased in the rest of metro area
• Age structure of Hispanic population changed
– Young Hispanic males left in substantial numbers
– Far more so than in other localities
• Percent of non-citizens, non-English speakers, and
linguistically isolated among Hispanics went down
• Police encountered fewer non-English
non English speakers
UVa CSR & PERF
53
Are there fewer illegal immigrants?
• Births to Hispanic women went down
• ESL
S enrollments,
ll
Hispanic
i
i school
h l enrollments
ll
leveled
• Key
K iinformants
f
t describe
d
ib changes
h
in
i recreation
ti
facilities, night clubs, overcrowded dwellings
– Reports that some Hispanics moved to Fairfax
– Fairfax demographics 2007-2008 reflect some influx
– But ppark usage
g has rebounded since 2007
UVa CSR & PERF
54
More on loss of immigrants . . .
•
We estimate that several thousand illegal immigrants left when the
policy was enacted
– And over the following year
– PWC, Manassas and Manassas Park were affected
– We estimate: a decrease of 2,000
2 000 – 6,000
6 000 illegal immigrants between 2006
and 2008
•
Economic crisis contributed
– Mortgage crisis
– Loss of construction jobs, housing market decline
•
The pattern of rising growth in immigrant population has halted
– Growth in immigrant population was rapid and increasing 2000 – 2006
– The growth in illegals was reversed
– The police policy was partly responsible for the shift
UVa CSR & PERF
55
Has the policy helped to
reduce crime?
Christopher Koper PhD
Police Executive Research Forum
(PERF)
UVa CSR & PERF
56
Examining the Policy
Policy’ss Impact on Crime
• Examination of PWCPD statistics on crime and arrests
– Arrests of illegal immigrants, 2008-2009
• Time series analysis of 7-10 years of PWCPD RMS
data
• Comparisons of PWC to other DC area jurisdictions
• Perceptions of officers,
officers 2008
2008-2009
2009
• Crime victimization and reporting in PWC citizen
surveys, 2008-2010
UVa CSR & PERF
57
Crime Rate in PWC,
PWC 2000
2000-2009
2009
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Based on Uniform Crime Reports Part I crimes (murder, rape, robbery,
aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft)
UVa CSR & PERF
58
Aggravated assaults
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
UVa CSR & PERF
59
Changes in UCR Part I Crimes in PWC
• Changes in two
two-year
year averages, 2005
2005-2006
2006 to 2008
20082009:
– Part I violence (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault)
• Total: -32%
• Aggravated
A
t d assault:
lt -47%
47%
– Part I pproperty
p y ((burglary,
g y, larceny,
y, auto theft):
) -8%
UVa CSR & PERF
60
H much
How
h crime
i
do
d ill
illegall immigrants
i
i
t
commit in PWC and
what have been the trends in crime
byy illegal
g immigrants?
g
UVa CSR & PERF
61
Arrests of Illegal Immigrants
for Serious Crimes, 2009
UCR Part 1
C i
Crimes
Total Persons
Illegal
I
Immigrants
i
t
Murder
12
0
Illegal
i
immigrants
i
t as %
of Arrestees
0%
Rape
37
3
8%
Robbery
117
4
3%
Aggravated
A
Assault
lt
Burglary
175
16
9%
191
8
4%
Larceny
1,467
88
6%
Motor Vehicle
Theft
Total
54
2
4%
2,053
121
6%
UVa CSR & PERF
62
Arrests of Illegal Immigrants for
Other
Oh S
Selected
l
d Off
Offenses, 2009
Crime
Category
Arrests
Arrests of
Illegal
Immigrants
Illegal
Immigrants as
% of Arrests
All UCR Part II
12,254
774
6%
Public
Drunkenness
1,365
269
20%
DUI
2,138
286
13%
Traffic—no
license
2,085
205
10%
UVa CSR & PERF
63
63
Arrest locations
and
residence locations
of arrested
illegal immigrants,
2009
UVa CSR & PERF
Countryy of birth, illegal
g alien detainers
Jan-Sept 2010
Arrests by Country of Birth
Eur o p e, 0 .8 3 %
N o n- Hisp anic C ar ib b ean, 0 .2 4 %
A sia,
sia 1
1.4
43%
A f r ica, 1.79 %
O t her Hisp anic C o unt r ies, 3 .58 %
Honduras, 14.66%
El Salvador, 37.43%
Guatem ala, 14.78%
95.3% are from
Latin America
Mexico, 25.27%
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: Adult Detention Center
Trends in Arrests of Illegal Immigrants, 20082009
Crime Category
2008 Arrests per
Month
2009 Arrests per
Month
UCR Part I crimes
6.3
10.1
Public drunkenness
15.4
22.4
DUI
11.1
23.8
Total
63.7 (Mar.-Dec.)
95.8
72.6 (Jul.-Dec.)
UVa CSR & PERF
66
66
Arrests for Public Drunkenness
1800
• Public drunkenness
arrests have decreased
• But not likely due to
policy because an
increased percentage of
the arrestees are illegals
• 2007 showed an increase
over 2006
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Arena arrests not included
UVa CSR & PERF
67
Conclusions from Arrest Data
• Illegal immigrants account for small to modest
share of offenders for most crime types
– Caveat: no data on involvement of illegal
g immigrants
g
in
crime before the policy
• A
Arrests
t off illegal
ill l immigrants
i
i
t increased
i
d from
f
2008
to 2009
– Deterrent effects of policy must have been greatest
before it was implemented in March 2008
UVa CSR & PERF
68
68
Did the policy affect trends in
crime in PWC?
UVa CSR & PERF
69
69
Analysis of Crime Trends in PWC
• Time series analysis of weekly trends over several
years
– Take into account long term trends, seasonal patterns, and
other
h predictable
di bl variation
i i over time
i
– Tested for effects from July 2007 policy announcement and
March 2008 implementation
• Crime reports for UCR Part I violent and property
crimes, 2003-2009
• Calls for service [CFS] for several categories of crime
and disorder, 2000-2009
UVa CSR & PERF
70
70
Pre-Post
Pre
Post Policy Changes in Crime
Offense / CFS Category
Before v. After
July 2007
Before v. After
March 2008
Part I violent crimes
-10.16%
-10.76%
Aggravated assault
-27.23%
27.23%
-27.50%
27.50%
1.25%
-0.18%
CFS for personal crimes
-8.37%
-8.74%
CFS for property crimes
-1.02%
-4.12%
CFS for disorder crimes
-4.94%
-5.98%
2.89%
2.36%
-1.02%
7.87%
Part I property crimes
CFS for drug-related crimes
CFS for DUI
UVa CSR & PERF
71
71
Aggravated Assaults in PWC, 2003-2009
(Weekl )
(Weekly)
UVa CSR & PERF
72
72
Geographical Patterns
i the
in
h Policy’s
P li ’ Impact
I
• E
Examined
i d trends
t d in
i violence
i l
in
i PWCPD patrol
t l beats
b t
in Manassas area, Woodbridge, and Dumfries
– Decline in total Part I violence in these areas accounted for
half of countywide reduction
– Decline in aggravated assaults in these areas accounted for
70% of countywide reduction
UVa CSR & PERF
73
73
Ethnicity of Aggravated Assault Victims and
Off d (f
Offenders
(from VA S
State P
Police)
li )
• 2005 – 2009:
– Hispanics accounted for 21% - 28% of arrestees (no
trend)
– Hispanics and victims with unknown ethnicity fell from
about half of victims during 2005–2007 to about onethird during 2008-2009
– Ratio of non-Hispanic
non Hispanic to Hispanic victims rose from
1.87 in 2005 to 2.88 in 2009
• Victimization of Hispanics falling relative to others
UVa CSR & PERF
74
Conclusions from Time Series Analysis
• Policy did not affect most types of crime and
disorder
• Serious assaults declined following the policy’s
announcement
– Effect concentrated in heavily
hea il Hispanic areas of PWC
– Change coincided closely with announcement of policy
– Questions about source of the decline:
• Change in offending, crime reporting, or both?
• Fewer immigrant offenders, victims, or both?
• Collateral effects?
UVa CSR & PERF
75
75
Impact on Hit and Run Accidents
Reportable Hit and Run Accidents County Wide by Year
400
347
Number Accid
dents
350
300
287
287
245
50
250
200
182
191
2008
2009
150
100
50
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
Year
Only shows incidents reportable to State Police.
Police
UVa CSR & PERF
76
How did crime trends in PWC
compare to
t those
th
iin other
th DC
area localities?
UVa CSR & PERF
77
77
Aggravated Assault Offenses 2003 - 2009 for
S l t d Areas
Selected
A
including
i l di DC/MD
10,000
Offenses
1,000
DC/MD
100
Other VA Metro
PWC + Cities
10
Prince William
1
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
UVa CSR & PERF
78
Aggravated Assault Offenses 2003 - 2009 for
PWC versus All Other
O h Metro
M
10000
All other Metro
1000
PWC + Cities
Prince William
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
UVa CSR & PERF
79
Changes in Crime Rates in PWC and Northern
VA Localities (Percentage Changes in 22-Yr
Yr
Averages, 2005/06 - 2008/09)
Jurisdiction
% Change
Violent Crime
% Change Agg
Assault
% Change
Property Crime
Prince William
-31.9%
-46.7%
-8.1%
Manassas City
-9.7%
-7.2%
-3.0%
Alexandria City
-37.6%
-43.5%
-4.8%
Arlington
-26.1%
-27.8%
6.7%
Fairfax
-14.7%
-2.1%
12.1%
Loudoun
32.8%
75.7%
-8.3%
Spotsylvania
37.5%
15.2%
27.0%
UVa CSR & PERF
80
Conclusions from Comparative Analysis
• Violence declined in a number of DC area localities
– Regional factors may have helped sustain reduction in PWC
(e.g., decline in housing market)
• But PWC’s decline in violence was large compared to
most of DC area, esp. for aggravated assault
• Crime did not consistently decline in localities doing
immigration checks
– PWC policy
li announcement andd publicity
bli i were unique
i
UVa CSR & PERF
81
Perceptions of Officers Regarding
C i andd Disorder
Crime
i d Problems
bl
F
From
surveys in
i fall
f ll 2008 andd fall
f ll 2009
UVa CSR & PERF
82
Problems Observed by Officers
(1=never, 2=occasionally, 3=often, 4=regularly)
Issue
Time 1(2008)
Time 2 (2009)
Getting legal immigrants to report crime.
1.84
1.80
Getting illegal immigrants to report crime.
2.38
2.20
Getting witnesses to cooperate with the
police.
Violent crimes in PWC
2.20
2.07
1.92
2.04
Property crimes in PWC
2.17
2.27
Public disorder (e.g., loitering, public
drinking,
g, etc.))
Traffic violations
2.51
2.60
2.42
2.59
Fear of crime in certain parts of PWC
2.14
2.22
UVa CSR & PERF
83
Post-policy trends in crime
victimization
ictimi ation and reporting
PWC survey results,
l 2008-2010
2008 2010
UVa CSR & PERF
84
Have you been a victim of crime?
Have you been a victim of a crime?
100
90
Pe
ercent 'yes'
80
70
60
Non-Hispanic
50
Hispanic
40
30
20
11.3
14.7
11.7
14.1
11.3
13.1
10
0
2008
UVa CSR & PERF
2009
2010
Source: PWC Citizen Surveys
85
Did you report the crime to police?
Did you report the
h crime
i
to police?
li ?
100
91.0
90
perc
cent 'yes'
80
84 5
84.5
78.8
78.8
79.3
82 5
82.5
70
60
Non-Hispanic
50
Hispanic
40
30
20
10
0
2008
UVa CSR & PERF
2009
2010
Source: PWC Citizen Surveys
86
Conclusions from PWC Survey Data
• Crime victimization has not changed from 2008 to
2010
• Victimization is somewhat higher
g
for Hispanics
p
but
their reporting levels are comparable to others
– No significant increase in victimization of Hispanics
• Crime reporting has not changed from 2008 to 2010
• But we do not have data on crime reporting among
ill l immigrants
illegal
i
i
t specifically
ifi ll
– PWCPD has evidence that Hispanic victims do not report
some crimes
UVa CSR & PERF
87
Summaryy
•
•
•
•
Illegal immigrants account for small to modest share of most
crimes
– 69% arrested
t d ffor ddrunkenness,
k
DUI
DUI, traffic
t ffi offenses
ff
Policy did not impact most types of crime
But aggravated assaults declined significantly after policy’s
announcement
– Unique decline compared to most of DC area
– Less immigrant
g
offending,
g victimization, reporting,
p
g or some
combination?
Reportable (more serious) hit and run accidents declined
– Less serious hit and run accidents also declined
•
Crime data and surveys of officers and citizens show stable crime
trends since policy’s implementation
UVa CSR & PERF
88
Did the County save money on
its services?
UVa CSR & PERF
89
No BIG savings
• Most of the more costlyy services pprovided by
y
PWC are federally regulated or funded
– Some must be supplied to everyone, regardless of
immigration status
stat s
• Notably, educational services like ESOL
– Some are already denied to illegal immigrants by
Federal law such as TANF, Food Stamps, Medicaid
• A small list of specific County services are denied
to illegal immigrants
– Cost savings transferred into services for legal residents
– Example
p – Homeless Prevention
UVa CSR & PERF
Were overcrowded housing
and problems of public order
reduced?
UVa CSR & PERF
91
Overcrowded housing declined;
Loitering reduced (temporarily?)
• Neighborhood services records show dramatic decline in
complaints about parking in overcrowded properties
– Down 38% from 2006 to 2008
• Residents reported less loitering at day labor sites
– But this problem came back after its initial decline
• Mortgage foreclosures reached crisis proportions
• Complaints about neglected vacant properties went up
substantially
– Weed/tall grass violations doubled from 2006 to 2008
• Changes in staffing
staffing, enforcement tools make time trends
unclear in Neighborhood Services data
– Enforcement capacity of Neighborhood Services increased
UVa CSR & PERF
92
What is overcrowding?
• PWC ordinances give specific definitions
– These allow many relatives to reside in a dwelling
– Most overcrowding complaints are judged to be “unfounded”
• Nationally, the household structure of Hispanics differs
from non
non-Hispanics
Hispanics
– More multi-family households, more “sub-families”
• Public Use Micro Sample data from ACS allow us to
examine
i households
h
h ld that
h include
i l d more than
h one family
f il
– “Complex HH” here includes any HH with a “subfamily” or a
second family in HH
• 34% of Hispanic households, 16% of non-Hispanic are
complex
– Across DC Metro (2005-2008)
(2005 2008)
UVa CSR & PERF
93
Complex HH among Hispanics
PWC + cities vs. rest of metro
Percentage
Complex
C
l H
Households
h ld
(among Hispanics)
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0 0%
0.0%
34.2%
36 8%
36.8%
A complex HH has
more than one family
and/or sub-family
PWC + cities
Rest of DC metro
40.2%
27.0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
Year
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: CSR analysis of ACS PUMS data
94
Complex HH among Hispanics
West PWC (+ cities) vs. East PWC
Complex Households
(among Hispanics)
A complex HH has
more than one family
and/or sub-family
Pe
ercentage
50.0%
46.5%
40.0%
30.0%
40.8%
33.3%
33.7%
39.3%
West PWC + cities
33.4%
28 4%
28.4%
20.0%
East PWC
20.7%
10.0%
0 0%
0.0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
Year
UVa CSR & PERF
Source: CSR analysis of ACS PUMS data
95
How did the policy affect
confidence in the PWC Police?
Data from PWC
Citizen Surveys
UVa CSR & PERF
96
Satisfaction with Police
% satisfied
Items
2008
2009
2010
Overall satisfaction
with Police
Police Department
carrying out
immigration policy
Police attitudes and
behaviors
89.0
92.5*
92.2
80.5
85.0*
76.0**
79.3
84.4
84.7
Police Department
treats everybody fairly
74.3
78.8*
79.9
* 2009 percentage significantly higher than 2008
** 2010 percentage significantly lower than 2009
Overall rating of police
by ethnic/racial group, by year
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
2000
2001
2002
2003
1 Hispanic
2004
2005
2006
2 Black (non-hispanic)
2007
2008
3 All Others
Before 2000, the number of Hispanic respondents was low.
2009
2010
Police attitudes and behaviors
by ethnic/racial group, by year
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
2000
2001
2002
1 Hispanic
2003
2004
2005
2006
2 Black (non-hispanic)
% satisfied
2007
2008
3 All Others
2009
2010
Hispanic Views by Language of Interview
English
Spanish
89.3
93.6
Police Department carrying out
immigration
g
ppolicyy
58.4
16.8
Police attitudes and behaviors
82.3
70.4
Police Department treats
everybody fairly
64.2
48.6
2010 Items
(Hispanics only)
Overall satisfaction with Police
% satisfied
Satisfaction with police,
police by language
Satisfied with Overall Performance of Police Department
Hispanic Respondents Only
100
90
91.1
Percent Sa
atisfied
84.8 87.3
85.7
80
89.7
93 2
93.2
70
60
65.4
English Interview
58 9
58.9
50
Spanish Interview
40
30
20
10
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
Satisfaction with attitudes,
attitudes by language
Satisfied with Police Department Attitudes Towards Citizens
Hispanic Respondents Only
100
90
93
Percent S
Satisfied
80
83.1
70
60
65.4
75
70.4
72
64.2
English Interview
50
Spanish Interview
40
30
26.3
20
10
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
Satisfaction with fairness
fairness, by language
Satisfied that Police Department Treats Everyone Fairly
Hispanic Respondents Only
100
90
Percent Sa
atisfied
80
70
60
50
61.9
58 9
58.9
50.6
40
30
65.7
English Interview
50
38.6
20
10
0
2008
2009
2010
Spanish Interview
Satisfaction with policy implementation,
by language
Satisfied with Job Police are Doing in Enforcing the Policy
Hispanic Respondents Only
100
90
Percent Satiisfied
80
70
72.7
70.9
70.4
60
English Interview
57.1
50
Spanish Interview
40
30
20
21.3
16.1
10
0
2008
2009
2010
Satisfaction with drug efforts,
efforts by language
Satisfied with Reduction in Use of Illegal Drugs
Hi
Hispanic
i Respondents
R
d t Only
O l
100
96.8
90
Percent Sattisfied
80
89.3
88.2 88.9
80.3
83.8
93 2
93.2
88.5
70
60
E li h IInterview
English
t i
50
Spanish Interview
40
30
20
10
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
Satisfaction with gang efforts,
efforts by language
Satisfied with Police Efforts to Combat Gangs
Hispanic Respondents Only
100
90
Percent Sa
atisfied
80
95.2
93.7
88.2
85.5
70
60
English Interview
50
Spanish Interview
40
30
20
10
0
2008
2010
Asked in even-numbered years only
Hispanic views of police
are issue-specific and media-sensitive
•
•
•
Introduction of the policy created serious ethnic gaps in perceptions
Ethnic gap (of 2008) in overall satisfaction with the police has
disappeared
Ethnic gaps in views of police attitudes and fairness have improved
y since 2008
markedly
– But residents still think that immigrants with poor English would not
report a crime nor act as a witness
•
Wide gaps between Spanish interviewees and English interviewees
– Spanish interviewees are less acculturated and more tuned to SpanishSpanish
language media
•
Hispanics, including Spanish interviews, approve of specific police
efforts and the police in general
– But Spanish
S i h iinterviewees
i
don’t
d ’ like
lik the
h immigration
i
i
i policy
li
•
Media attention to local and national immigration events in 2010
heightened fears about PWC’s policy
UVa CSR & PERF
107
Many lack understanding of the policy
• In semi-structured interviews, respondents were
asked their understanding of the policy
– Few can give specifics about the policy
– Spanish-speaking Hispanics are especially likely to be
unclear on the policy
• Many unable to understand the question itself
• Perhaps not seeing police posture as policy-governed
• Current information on the ppolice website is in
need of updating
– And simplification
UVa CSR & PERF
108
How did the policy affect
views of PWC as an inclusive
community?
Views of PWC residents
(from annual community surveys)
UVa CSR & PERF
109
PWC Quality of Life
• Rated on a ten-point scale (10 = highest)
•
•
•
•
•
•
Current rating:
2009 rating:
2008 rating:
2007 rating:
2006 rating:
1993 rating:
7.28
7.30
6.98
7.18
7.15
6.90
*The 2010 mean rating is significantly different from the 2008 mean rating
UVa CSR & PERF
110
Qualityy of Life Ratings:
g 1993-2010
10
9
8
6.99
7.32
7.30
7.15 7.18
7.28
7
6.90
7.26
7.25
7.24
7.06
6.98
7.05
7 28
7.28
7 27
7.27
7 25
7.25
7 24
7.24
6.98
6
Mean
5
4
3
2
1
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Quality of Life
by ethnic/racial group, by year
Rating PWC as a place to live,
live 1 to 10 scale.
scale
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
2002
2003
2004
1 Hi s pani c
2005 2006
2007 2008
2 Bl ac k (non-hi s pani c )
2009
2010
3 Al l Othe r s
Want to live in PWC 5 years from now?
by ethnic/racial group by year
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Hispanic
UVa CSR & PERF
2006
2007
Black (non-hispanic)
2008
2009
2010
2011
All Others
Question was asked every other year until 2008
113
Trust in County Government, 2003-2010
• How often do
residents trust the
County government
to do what’s right?
2003
62.8%
2004
63 7%
63.7%
2005
64.1%
2006
60.2%
2007
64.1%
2008
58.4%
2009
63.4%
2010
63.0%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Percent saying "Always" or "Most of the time"
UVa CSR & PERF
114
Differences byy Ethnicityy
Trust in County Government
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
2000
2001
2002
2003
Hispanic
2004
2005
2006
Black (non-hispanic)
2007
2008
All Others
% saying always or most of the time
2009
2010
How did the policy affect
views of PWC as an inclusive
community?
Effect on Hispanic demand for
PWC homes and
Hispanic population change
UVa CSR & PERF
116
Growth in Hispanic population
1990-2010
700,000
600,000
Population
n
500,000
400,000
300,000
200 000
200,000
100,000
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Year
PWC
UVa CSR & PERF
DC Metro
Metro minus PWC
Source: US Census & ACS
Conclusions of the study
UVa CSR & PERF
118
Conclusions about the Policy
Policy’ss Goals
1.
Reduce the number of illegal immigrants in the County:
•
•
•
2.
The number of illegal immigrants has been reduced
Result: leveled growth and changed demographics of Hispanic
population
Hispanic
p
demand for home mortgages
g g in PWC was reduced
Improve Public Safety and Reduce Crime:
•
•
•
•
•
Most types of crimes were not affected by the policy, however:
A
Aggravated
d assaults
l were reduced
d d bby the
h policy
li
• Police initiatives predating 2008 also had impact on violent
crime
Hit and run accidents were reduced
Public drunkenness went down; cause unclear
No significant
g
change
g in disorder crimes
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about the Policy
Policy’ss Goals
3.
Reduce neighborhood problems
•
•
4.
Overcrowding complaints are down, but founded violations are
up
Day laborer sites went down temporarily
• But sites are still active in the County
• BOCS passed July 2010 ordinance which regulates
solicitation on public ways
Save money by delivering fewer services to illegal
immigrants:
•
•
ESOL students still high in schools but leveled
• Cannot restrict by
y Federal Law
Funding saved by restricting services to illegal immigrants in
programs such as homeless intervention shifted to citizens and
legal immigrants
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about the Policy
Policy’ss Goals
5.
Maintain communityy confidence and trust in Police
•
•
•
The community became ethnically divided in its views of the
police in 2008
After two years, the ethnic gaps in perception are mostly
repaired
Police have conducted over 200 outreach opportunities with the
community since current resolution approved by BOCS
•
•
IInformation
f
ti about
b t the
th BOCS policy
li iis provided
id d att events,
t on th
the
website in English and Spanish
Spanish-speaking Hispanics still view the policy negatively but
have returned to positive views of the police overall.
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about the Policy
Policy’ss Goals
6.
Maintain County’s reputation as an inclusive community
both internally and externally
•
•
•
•
•
Hispanic ratings of quality of life, desire to live in PWC in the
future dropped sharply in 2008, opening an ethnic gap in
perception
ti
Quality of life ratings show no difference in 2010 between
Hispanic, Black and other
Percent of Hispanics in the County wanting to live in PWC five
years from now is no different than non-Hispanics in 2010
Trust in government has been maintained at historic rates,
however, trust by minorities is lower than it is “others”
Lowered Hispanic growth in PWC suggests issues with
perception of PWC among Hispanics outside the County
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about Unintended Consequences:
A.
Facilitate overzealous or inappropriate enforcement
actions
i
by
b Police?
P li ?
–
–
B.
No lawsuits directly claiming racial profiling have been filed
against the County
From 2008-2010,
2008 2010 satisfaction regarding Police behaviors
improved from 70% to 83% (08-10) for English-speaking
Hispanics and from 26% to 72% for Spanish-speaking Hispanics
Generate a costlyy flood of litigation
g
against
g
the Police
Department and the County?
•
The litigation flood did not materialize
The risks of these unintended consequences were greatly
reduced by the BOCS change to the current policy being
implemented today.
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about Unintended Consequences:
C.
Overburden the PD to the ppoint of reducingg its
effectiveness and create admin costs far greater than
anticipated?
•
•
•
•
•
Initial implementation
p
did require
q
resources for training,
g,
outreach and for executive staff
• but burden has somewhat diminished
Ongoing cost of the Criminal Alien Unit is in the Five-Year
Budget
Officers report policy has become a routine part of PD business
Overwhelmingly, Police Officers believe they have the
necessary training and skills to implement the BOCS policy
This does represent a significant, continuing impact on the PD
and its resources
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about Unintended Consequences:
D.
Create fear and a sense of being unwelcome amongst
i
immigrants
i
in
i generall andd cause legal
l l immigrants
i
i
to
leave?
•
•
•
E.
Clear that illegal
g immigrants
g
have left County,
y, unclear if legal
g
immigrants have also left County
Hispanic population has leveled off
Hispanics who live here now say they want to live in PWC five
years from now
Capacity problems at jail, or with ICE?
•
•
Some problems
S
bl
iin first
fi t few
f months,
th promptly
tl resolved
l d
We don’t know how ICE disposes of cases turned over to them
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about Unintended Consequences:
F.
Result in lower crime reporting from the Hispanic
communityy or increase their victimization?
•
•
•
•
•
No significant change in reported victimization by Hispanics
(citizen survey)
Hispanics reporting crimes has not changed significantly, and is
same as rate for non-Hispanics
non Hispanics (citizen survey)
Under-reporting could play a role in decreases seen in some
crimes, but cannot explain all of the decreases.
g
Hispanics
p
that
• PWCPD has evidence of some crimes against
were not reported
• Residents & some officers are still concerned that crimes are
not being reported by illegal immigrants
The immigration policy is still not well understood,
understood especially
by Hispanics who do not speak English well.
PWCPD outreach efforts must continue to encourage crime
reporting without fear of an immigration check
UVa CSR & PERF
Conclusions about implementation
• Police implemented the policy smoothly, with a high level
of effort & professionalism
p
–
–
–
–
–
Strong leadership, with continuity and focus
Training fully met officer needs
Clear message: Racial profiling would not be tolerated
Good coordination and support from ICE
Additional time burden on officers accommodated without
reducing departmental effectiveness
• Major time commitment from senior staff was needed
– High satisfaction with implementation among residents
• Police invested major effort in promoting public
understanding of the policy
– These efforts took time to show success
– Further work is needed to educate Spanish speakers and users of
p
media about the policy
p
y
Spanish
UVa CSR & PERF
127
In sum,
sum we conclude . . .
• The Prince William County illegal immigration
enforcement
f
policy:
li
• Was smoothly implemented by PWCPD and County
staff
• Had wide-ranging effects
• Some of these effects were those intended
• Some
S
off th
the policy’s
li ’ goals
l were nott achieved
hi d
• Had few of the unintended consequences that some had
feared
It IS possible for a local government to have an
impact on its illegal immigration experience.
UVa CSR & PERF
November 16, 2010
FINAL REPORT
Evaluation Study of
Prince William County’s
Illegal Immigration Enforcement Policy
www.virginia.edu/surveys
Contact:
Tom Guterbock
[email protected]