NI539 Jul. 2008

Spectral Fatigue Analysis
Methodology for Ships
and Offshore Units
July 2008
Guidance Note
NI 539 DT R00 E
17 bis, Place des Reflets – La Défense 2 – 92400 Courbevoie
Postal Address : 92077 Paris La Défense Cedex
Tel. 33 (0) 1 42 91 52 91 – Fax. 33 (0) 1 42 91 53 20
Email : [email protected]
Web : http://www.veristar.com
MARINE DIVISON
GENERAL CONDITIONS
ARTICLE 1
ARTICLE 6
1.1. - BUREAU VERITAS is a Society the purpose of whose Marine Division (the “Society”) is the classification (“Classification”) of any ship or vessel or structure of any type or part of it or system therein collectively hereinafter referred to as a “Unit” whether linked to shore, river bed or sea bed or not, whether
operated or located at sea or in inland waters or partly on land, including submarines, hovercrafts, drilling
rigs, offshore installations of any type and of any purpose, their related and ancillary equipment, subsea or
not, such as well head and pipelines, mooring legs and mooring points or otherwise as decided by the Society.
6.1. - The Society accepts no responsibility for the use of information related to its Services which was not
provided for the purpose by the Society or with its assistance.
The Society:
• prepares and publishes Rules for classification, Guidance Notes and other documents (“Rules”);
• issues Certificates, Attestations and Reports following its interventions (“Certificates”);
• publishes Registers.
1.2. - The Society also participates in the application of National and International Regulations or Standards,
in particular by delegation from different Governments. Those activities are hereafter collectively referred to
as “Certification”.
1.3. - The Society can also provide services related to Classification and Certification such as ship and company safety management certification; ship and port security certification, training activities; all activities and
duties incidental thereto such as documentation on any supporting means, software, instrumentation,
measurements, tests and trials on board.
1.4. - The interventions mentioned in 1.1., 1.2. and 1.3. are referred to as “Services”. The party and/or its
representative requesting the services is hereinafter referred to as the “Client”. The Services are prepared
and carried out on the assumption that the Clients are aware of the International Maritime and/or
Offshore Industry (the “Industry”) practices.
1.5. - The Society is neither and may not be considered as an Underwriter, Broker in ship’s sale or chartering, Expert in Unit’s valuation, Consulting Engineer, Controller, Naval Architect, Manufacturer, Shipbuilder,
Repair yard, Charterer or Shipowner who are not relieved of any of their expressed or implied obligations
by the interventions of the Society.
ARTICLE 2
2.1. - Classification is the appraisement given by the Society for its Client, at a certain date, following surveys by its Surveyors along the lines specified in Articles 3 and 4 hereafter on the level of compliance of a
Unit to its Rules or part of them. This appraisement is represented by a class entered on the Certificates
and periodically transcribed in the Society’s Register.
2.2. - Certification is carried out by the Society along the same lines as set out in Articles 3 and 4 hereafter
and with reference to the applicable National and International Regulations or Standards.
2.3. - It is incumbent upon the Client to maintain the condition of the Unit after surveys, to present
the Unit for surveys and to inform the Society without delay of circumstances which may affect the
given appraisement or cause to modify its scope.
2.4. - The Client is to give to the Society all access and information necessary for the performance of the
requested Services.
ARTICLE 3
3.1. - The Rules, procedures and instructions of the Society take into account at the date of their preparation
the state of currently available and proven technical knowledge of the Industry. They are not a code of construction neither a guide for maintenance or a safety handbook.
Committees consisting of personalities from the Industry contribute to the development of those documents.
3.2. - The Society only is qualified to apply its Rules and to interpret them. Any reference to them
has no effect unless it involves the Society’s intervention.
3.3. - The Services of the Society are carried out by professional Surveyors according to the Code of Ethics
of the Members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS).
3.4. - The operations of the Society in providing its Services are exclusively conducted by way of
random inspections and do not in any circumstances involve monitoring or exhaustive verification.
ARTICLE 4
4.1. - The Society, acting by reference to its Rules:
• reviews the construction arrangements of the Units as shown on the documents presented by the Client;
• conducts surveys at the place of their construction;
• classes Units and enters their class in its Register;
• surveys periodically the Units in service to note that the requirements for the maintenance of class are
met.
The Client is to inform the Society without delay of circumstances which may cause the date or the
extent of the surveys to be changed.
ARTICLE 5
5.1. - The Society acts as a provider of services. This cannot be construed as an obligation bearing
on the Society to obtain a result or as a warranty.
5.2. - The certificates issued by the Society pursuant to 5.1. here above are a statement on the level
of compliance of the Unit to its Rules or to the documents of reference for the Services provided for.
In particular, the Society does not engage in any work relating to the design, building, production
or repair checks, neither in the operation of the Units or in their trade, neither in any advisory services, and cannot be held liable on those accounts. Its certificates cannot be construed as an implied
or express warranty of safety, fitness for the purpose, seaworthiness of the Unit or of its value for
sale, insurance or chartering.
5.3. - The Society does not declare the acceptance or commissioning of a Unit, nor of its construction in conformity with its design, that being the exclusive responsibility of its owner or builder, respectively.
5.4. - The Services of the Society cannot create any obligation bearing on the Society or constitute any warranty of proper operation, beyond any representation set forth in the Rules, of any Unit, equipment or machinery, computer software of any sort or other comparable concepts that has been subject to any survey
by the Society.
6.2. - If the Services of the Society cause to the Client a damage which is proved to be the direct and
reasonably foreseeable consequence of an error or omission of the Society, its liability towards the
Client is limited to ten times the amount of fee paid for the Service having caused the damage, provided however that this limit shall be subject to a minimum of eight thousand (8,000) Euro, and to
a maximum which is the greater of eight hundred thousand (800,000) Euro and one and a half times
the above mentioned fee.
The Society bears no liability for indirect or consequential loss such as e.g. loss of revenue, loss of
profit, loss of production, loss relative to other contracts and indemnities for termination of other
agreements.
6.3. - All claims are to be presented to the Society in writing within three months of the date when the Services were supplied or (if later) the date when the events which are relied on of were first known to the Client,
and any claim which is not so presented shall be deemed waived and absolutely barred.
ARTICLE 7
7.1. - Requests for Services are to be in writing.
7.2. - Either the Client or the Society can terminate as of right the requested Services after giving
the other party thirty days' written notice, for convenience, and without prejudice to the provisions
in Article 8 hereunder.
7.3. - The class granted to the concerned Units and the previously issued certificates remain valid until the
date of effect of the notice issued according to 7.2. hereabove subject to compliance with 2.3. hereabove
and Article 8 hereunder.
ARTICLE 8
8.1. - The Services of the Society, whether completed or not, involve the payment of fee upon receipt of the
invoice and the reimbursement of the expenses incurred.
8.2. - Overdue amounts are increased as of right by interest in accordance with the applicable legislation.
8.3. - The class of a Unit may be suspended in the event of non-payment of fee after a first unfruitful
notification to pay.
ARTICLE 9
9.1. - The documents and data provided to or prepared by the Society for its Services, and the information
available to the Society, are treated as confidential. However:
• Clients have access to the data they have provided to the Society and, during the period of classification
of the Unit for them, to the classification file consisting of survey reports and certificates which have
been prepared at any time by the Society for the classification of the Unit ;
• copy of the documents made available for the classification of the Unit and of available survey reports
can be handed over to another Classification Society Member of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) in case of the Unit’s transfer of class;
• the data relative to the evolution of the Register, to the class suspension and to the survey status of the
Units are passed on to IACS according to the association working rules;
• the certificates, documents and information relative to the Units classed with the Society may be
reviewed during IACS audits and are disclosed upon order of the concerned governmental or inter-governmental authorities or of a Court having jurisdiction.
The documents and data are subject to a file management plan.
ARTICLE 10
10.1. - Any delay or shortcoming in the performance of its Services by the Society arising from an event not
reasonably foreseeable by or beyond the control of the Society shall be deemed not to be a breach of contract.
ARTICLE 11
11.1. - In case of diverging opinions during surveys between the Client and the Society’s surveyor, the Society may designate another of its surveyors at the request of the Client.
11.2. - Disagreements of a technical nature between the Client and the Society can be submitted by the
Society to the advice of its Marine Advisory Committee.
ARTICLE 12
12.1. - Disputes over the Services carried out by delegation of Governments are assessed within the framework of the applicable agreements with the States, international Conventions and national rules.
12.2. - Disputes arising out of the payment of the Society’s invoices by the Client are submitted to the Court
of Nanterre, France.
12.3. - Other disputes over the present General Conditions or over the Services of the Society are
exclusively submitted to arbitration, by three arbitrators, in London according to the Arbitration Act
1996 or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof. The contract between the Society and
the Client shall be governed by English law.
ARTICLE 13
13.1. - These General Conditions constitute the sole contractual obligations binding together the
Society and the Client, to the exclusion of all other representation, statements, terms, conditions
whether express or implied. They may be varied in writing by mutual agreement.
13.2. - The invalidity of one or more stipulations of the present General Conditions does not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.
13.3. - The definitions herein take precedence over any definitions serving the same purpose which may
appear in other documents issued by the Society.
BV Mod. Ad. ME 545 j - 16 February 2004
GUIDANCE NOTE NI 539
Spectral Fatigue Analysis Methodology
for Ships and Offshore Units
Section 1
July 2008
Spectral Fatigue Analysis Methodology
for Ships and Offshore Units
2
Bureau Veritas
July 2008
Section 1
Spectral Fatigue Analysis Methodology
for Ships and Offshore Units
1
General
1.1
1.2
1.3
2
5
6
July 2008
8
Modeling and boundary conditions
Loading
Hot spot stress RAO
Spectral analysis
6.1
6.2
6.3
8
Modeling and boundary conditions
Loading
Analysis
Fine mesh analysis
5.1
5.2
5.3
7
Introduction
Hydrodynamic model
Analysis
Global structural analysis
4.1
4.2
4.3
5
Wave scatter diagrams
Wave spectrum
Loading conditions
Wave headings
Hydrodynamic analysis
3.1
3.2
3.3
4
Introduction
SFA process
Conditions of analysis
Encountered conditions
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3
5
9
Response spectrum
Spectral moments
Damage calculation
Bureau Veritas
3
4
Bureau Veritas
July 2008
NI 539, Sec 1
SECTION 1
1
SPECTRAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
FOR SHIPS AND OFFSHORE UNITS
General
1.1
1.3
Introduction
1.1.1 The present note provides the methodology to perform a Spectral Fatigue Analysis (SFA).
A spectral fatigue analysis is performed on structural details of
a ship structure or offshore unit to take account of the different
environmental conditions encountered by the structure during
its design life.
Conditions of analysis
1.3.1 Several models have to be prepared: static (still-water)
model corresponding to the loading condition being analysed (draught, weight distribution), hydrodynamic model and
structural model. The objective is to apply to the structural
model the loads obtained from the hydrodynamic analysis.
Therefore, special attention is to be paid to the consistency
between these two models for transfer of loads.
1.3.2 The frequency calculation is carried out regarding
two principal parameters:
1.1.2 In this note, the fluctuating loads studied for fatigue
analysis are the wave-induced loads.
• draught and loading condition
1.1.3 The Spectral Fatigue Analysis methodology described
in this note is based on linear frequency domain analysis.
2
• wave heading.
2.1
1.2
Encountered conditions
Wave scatter diagrams
SFA process
• the long term distribution of stresses resulting from the
action of the cyclic loads applied on the structure
2.1.1 The long-term description of seas encountered by the
ship or at the offshore unit site is usually provided in terms
of scatter diagram(s) of sea-states, giving the number of
observations over a certain period of discrete sea-states,
each being defined by the significant wave height Hs and a
period (e.g. the peak period Tp).
• the fatigue capacity of the structure, characterized by S-N
curves.
2.2
1.2.1 A procedure for fatigue strength assessment requires
determining:
1.2.2 A Spectral Fatigue Analysis includes the following
steps, described in Fig 1:
• Hydrodynamic analysis: external loads induced by the
waves on the ship structure or offshore unit as well as
the resulting motions are determined by a hydrodynamic analysis in frequency domain.
• Structural analysis: loads are transferred to the structural
model. Global analysis on a full or partial structural
model, followed by a very fine mesh analysis provide
the RAOs of stresses (Response Amplitude Operators) at
the location of interest.
• Spectral analysis: the response spectrum at each location
of interest is obtained by the technique of spectral analysis. The short-term distribution of stresses is obtained by
statistics over short-term sea-states, headings and loading conditions of the ship or offshore unit. Long-term distribution of stresses during the design lifetime is then
obtained by summation over the wave scatter diagrams.
• Fatigue damage: the fatigue damage is determined by
the Miner sum, either from the long-term distribution of
stress ranges and appropriate S-N curve or by summation of fatigue damage for each short-term response.
July 2008
Wave spectrum
2.2.1 Each sea-state is described by a wave energy spectrum
of appropriate shape for the voyage or site under consideration (e.g. Pierson-Moskowitz, JONSWAP, Ochi Hubble).
2.2.2 To take account of confused short-crested seas, the
total wave energy spectrum may be split according to wave
direction as follow:
S (ω, θ) = S (ω) G (ω, θ)
Where S(ω) is the wave spectrum and G(ω,θ) the directional
spreading function, characterizing the directional distribution of the wave energy around the mean direction.
2.3
Loading conditions
2.3.1 Offshore units
The loading conditions that may be considered for SFA of
offshore units may be the ones described in NR445 Rules
for Offshore Units.
Representative loading conditions of the loading/unloading
sequences may be selected from the loading manual or
from operating data. Each loading condition being characterized by the levels in oil and water ballast tanks and the
associated draught.
Bureau Veritas
5
NI 539, Sec 1
Figure 1 : SFA process
( $ $
) * !
!"#
%& $ $
' 2.3.2 Oil tankers
The loading conditions that may be considered for SFA of
oil tankers are the full load and ballast conditions, as
described in IACS Common Structural Rules for Double
Hull Oil Tankers or NR467 Rules for Steel Ships as the case
may be.
2.3.3 Bulk carriers
The loading conditions that may be considered for SFA of
bulk carriers are the homogeneous, normal ballast, heavy
ballast and eventually alternate conditions (depending on
bulk carrier notation), as described in IACS Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers or NR467 Rules for Steel Ships
as the case may be.
2.3.4 Other ships
The loading conditions that may be considered for SFA of
other ships are the ones described in NR467 Rules for Steel
Ships.
2.4
Wave headings
2.4.1 The range of headings to be considered depends on
the type of ship or offshore unit.
6
For a trading ship or a spread moored unit, the range of
headings has to cover 360°.
When the offshore unit is turret moored, the wave headings
of interest can be generally taken in the range [-90°, 90°]
from “head sea”. The range of wave headings may be determined more precisely by performing a heading study. In this
case, the environmental conditions (wave current, wind) are
to be combined as described in NI493 Classification of
Mooring Systems for Permanent Offshore Units, Appendix 2.
When swell and wind seas are independant, both conditions are to be computed separately.
2.4.2 A heading interval in the range of 15° to 22° will be
adequate to get accurate directional response using directional spectrum.
The heading interval is often taken as 45°, in relation with
commonly available directional information. This is however not sufficient to catch the directional response of the
structure to waves (e.g. horizontal wave bending moment)
and precludes the use of directional spectrum to describe
waves.
Bureau Veritas
July 2008
NI 539, Sec 1
3
Hydrodynamic analysis
3.1
The size of elements may be constant but needs to be
refined near the waterline, at the end parts of the model and
at the location of sharp corners.
Introduction
3.1.1 The objective of the hydrodynamic analysis is to evaluate by direct calculations RAOs of wave-induced loads
(e.g. motions, accelerations, wave pressures and hull girder
loads such as bending moments and shear forces), for the
environmental conditions during the ship trading routes or
at the site where the offshore unit will operate.
3.1.2 The hydrodynamic analysis is to be carried out using
a recognised software, such as Hydrostar of the Society. In
particular, the use of a software based on three dimensional
potential flow based diffraction radiation theory is required.
Any other software is to be documented.
3.2
Hydrodynamic model
3.2.1 General
The model should take into account the following effects:
• The ship or unit forms with appendices (e.g. skeg), if any
• The weight distribution of the loading conditions
described in [3.2.2], including lightship distribution
• The connections with the seabed if any.
For each loading condition, the hydrodynamic model is to
be consistent with the loading manual in terms of mass distribution, inertia, trim, still water bending moments and
shear forces.
3.2.4 Number of elements
The wetted surface of the ship or unit should be modeled by
a sufficient number of elements.
The number of elements is to be taken between 700 to 1500
for a half hull. A greater number of elements normally does
not influence the results.
3.3
Analysis
3.3.1 General
The hydrodynamic analysis is based on linear theory. The
motions are calculated without taking into account non-linearities due to intermittent wetting effect in the splash zone,
flare and water on deck.
The motion analysis will account for such loads as the
external loads by incident and diffracted wave, the inertial
loads, the hydrodynamic added mass and damping loads
and the hydrostatic restoring forces.
3.3.2 Range of frequencies
A range of wave frequencies of 0,1 to 1,5 rad/s is normally
sufficient.
30 to 35 wave frequencies is adequate. 20 is a minimum.
A refinement around the ship resonance frequency is recommended.
3.2.2 Weight distribution
The inertia matrices necessary to the hydrodynamic analysis
can be derived from the mass model. The mass model has
to reflect the steel weight distribution, the weight distribution of cargo and ballast and the weight distributions of others items (e.g. topside structures for offshore units)
3.3.3 Rolling damping
Roll motion is sensible to roll damping. The viscous part of
roll damping may be calibrated by model tests or estimated
by semi-empiric formulation.
For a full structural model, the mass matrix is obtained from
the structural model which includes a description of the
mass distribution.
• Linear damping coefficients:
For a three holds structural model, the mass matrix of the
modeled part is obtained in the same way as for the full ship
structural model. The mass matrix of the fore and aft parts
have to be evaluated as well, so that the aggregate mass
matrix of all 3 parts is matching the global mass matrix.
In the case where no value is available, the following roll
damping may be considered:
• taken between 5% and 8% of the critical damping
for tankers, bulk carriers and LNG carriers
• taken between 3% and 5% of the critical damping
for container ship
• Quadratic damping coefficient :
• 0,5ρCdB4L
where:
Any inaccuracy on mass matrix may result in either an
unbalance of the structural model or incorrect end shear
forces and/or bending moments.
3.2.3 Dimension of panels
In the cylindrical part of the ship or offshore unit, the wave
length must be properly described: 6 to 10 points over one
wave length. For this reason, the following relationship may
be satisfied:
L w ave
L pa ne l ≤ ----------10
where:
2
gT
L w ave = -------2π
T
July 2008
: Shortest encountered wave period.
ρ
: Sea water density, in t/m3
Cd
B
: Adimensional drag coefficient, whose
value depends on hull shape, may be
taken within the range [0,08 ; 0,1] for
offshore units and [0,06 ; 0,08] for ships
: Ship or unit breadth, in m
L
: Ship or unit length, in m.
3.3.4 Results
The results provided by the hydrodynamic calculations are
the RAOs of loads (e.g. external pressures, motions...) for
the different combinations of frequencies, headings and
loading conditions. The next step is to determine the structural behaviour of the ship or of the offshore unit under
these conditions.
Bureau Veritas
7
NI 539, Sec 1
4
4.1
Global structural analysis
4.2.4 Internal tank pressure and cargo loads
The pressure in internal tank or cargo hold is deduced from
the tank accelerations.
Modeling and boundary conditions
4.1.1 General
The structural model may be a full model, or includes several cargo holds (generally 3), centered on the area of interest for the fatigue analysis.
Attention is to be paid for the mesh on the waterline area,
for the considered loading conditions. In this area, the
height of panels is to be reduced. A panel height equal to
ordinary stiffener spacing may be used.
4.1.2 Full model
In the case of a full model, modeling and boundary conditions are to be in accordance with NR467 Rules for Steel
Ships , Pt B, Ch 7, App 3, [2].
4.1.3 Three holds model
In the case of a three holds model and depending on the
ship or unit type, modeling and boundary conditions are to
be in accordance with:
• Rules for Offshore Units (NR445)
• CSR for Oil Tankers (NR523)
• CSR for Bulk Carriers (NR522)
4.2.5 Inertia loadings
The inertia loading is generated from the accelerations acting on the steel mass of the structure, and other masses.
4.2.6 Hull girder loads for three holds models
In the case of a three holds model, hull girder bending
moments and shear forces are to be determined to represent
the ends of the model, and are used as boundary conditions.
4.3
Analysis
4.3.1 When structural analysis takes into account still water
and dynamic effects, an additional still water calculation is
to be performed for each loading condition.
Loading
4.2.1 General
Wave pressures and inertia loads obtained from the hydrodynamic analysis are to be transferred from the hydrodynamic model into the structural model. Hydrodynamic and
structural models have to be consistent, both in geometry
and in the description of mass.
Under the assumptions of a linear spectral analysis, overall
loading for each combination of frequency, wave heading
and loading is harmonic and can be described by real and
imaginary parts.
4.2.2 Wave pressure loads
The sea pressure obtained from the hydrodynamic analysis
has to be transferred to the structural model of the ship or
offshore unit.
In the case the mesh of the hydrodynamic model and the
structural model are the same, the sea pressure may be
taken directly from the hydrodynamic analysis and applied
to finite elements.
4.2.3 Intermittent wetting
In linear diffraction-radiation analysis, hydrodynamic pressure is obtained over the wetted surface at rest as a harmonic pressure variation at each point. Therefore, the
pressure on the side shell between the surface at rest and a
wave crest is not modeled, and in a wave through below the
surface at rest, an unrealistic negative pressure is generated.
Intermittent wetting effect, in the free surface area, is to be
taken into account by means of an additional pressure loading on the side shell.
8
Non-linearities induced by pressure distribution in internal
tank and cargo hold is to be avoided as fatigue calculation
is performed in the frequency domain.
4.3.2 The RAOs of displacements of the global calculation
are extracted in the area of fatigue interest as boundary conditions for the fine mesh analysis.
• Rules for Steel Ships (NR467).
4.2
A quasi-static approximation may be used, under the
assumption of small movements of the ship or offshore unit,
where the pressure is defined based on the intensity and
angular variations of the total acceleration, including gravity.
5
5.1
Fine mesh analysis
Modeling and boundary conditions
5.1.1 Depending on the ship or unit type, fine mesh modeling and boundary conditions are to be in accordance with:
• Rules for Offshore Units (NR445)
• CSR for Oil Tankers (NR523)
• CSR for Bulk Carriers (NR522)
• Rules for Steel Ships (NR467).
5.2
Loading
5.2.1 The fine mesh is to be loaded with the same loads
than those applied in the global model in [4.2].
5.3
Hot spot stress RAO
5.3.1 Depending on the ship or unit type, the hot spot
stress RAO may be calculated according to:
• Rules for Offshore Units (NR445)
• CSR for Oil Tankers (NR523)
• CSR for Bulk Carriers (NR522)
• Rules for Steel Ships (NR467).
5.3.2 When structural analysis takes into account still water
and dynamic effects, an additional fine mesh calculation in
still water condition is to be performed for each loading
condition to get the still water hot spot stress at location of
interest.
Bureau Veritas
July 2008
NI 539, Sec 1
For each loading condition, this stress is to be deduced to the
real and imaginary hot spot stresses calculated for the different load cases (combinations of frequency and heading).
5.3.3 On the free surface area, the hot spot stresses RAO
are to be corrected to take account of the intermittent wetting effect.
The RAO correction may be based on an additional stress,
function of an additional loading and combined with the
Relative Wave Elevation (RWE) calculated at each frequency.
6
Spectral analysis
6.1
• Mean zero-up-crossing period of the stress response:
m
T z = 2 π -------0
m2
6.2.2 In the case of a ship with an advance speed V, the
spectral moments are given by:
∞
Mn =
∫ω
n
e
⋅ S ( ω ) dω
0
Where ωe is the encountered frequency calculated as:
ω ⋅ V ⋅ cos θ
ω e = ω – -------------------------------g
2
Response spectrum
6.1.1 A linear modeling of the ship is assumed for fatigue.
The structural response is then described by a superposition
of the response of all regular wave components, leading to a
frequency analysis.
6.3
Damage calculation
The response spectrum is given as follow:
6.3.1 Short-term distribution
For a ship or offshore unit, the stress range is generally
assumed narrow banded and assumed to be Rayleigh distributed during each short-term loading state.
S σ ( ω H s, T z, θ ) = H σ ( ω θ ) ⋅ S η ( ω Hs , T z )
6.3.2
2
Hσ (ω,θ) is the stress range transfer function obtained for
each loading condition, whose values depend on the wave
frequency and on the heading angle. It contains all the
RAOs of stresses.
When directional spreading is considered according to
[2.2], the stress response is obtained as:
Short-term damage for a single slope S-N
curve
For a single slope S-N curve, the damage corresponding to
one sea-state spectrum (Hs, Tz) is given as follow:
m
T
m
D = ------------- ⋅ ( 2 2m 0 ) ⋅ Γ ⎛ ----- + 1⎞
⎝2
⎠
K ⋅ Tz
where:
S σ ( ω H s, T z, θ ) = H σ ( ω θ ) ⋅ S η ( ω Hs , T z ) ⋅ G ( ω, θ )
K,m
: S-N curve parameters of the single slope S-N
curve
6.1.2
T
: Reference duration
m0
: Spectral moment of order 0
Γ
: Gamma function.
2
Mean stress effect
The response spectrum may be corrected to take account of
the less damaging effect of the compressive part of the stress
range, for each loading condition if any.
The correction requires the mean stress calculation at location of interest for each loading condition.
Depending on the ship or unit type, Mean stress effect correction may be carried out according to:
• Rules for Offshore Units (NR445)
m
T
m
D = ------------- ⋅ ( 2 2m 0 ) ⋅ μ ⋅ Γ ⎛⎝ ----- + 1⎞⎠
K ⋅ Tz
2
where:
• CSR for Oil Tankers (NR523)
μ
• CSR for Bulk Carriers (NR522)
• Rules for Steel Ships (NR467).
6.2
6.3.3 Short-term damage for a two slopes S-N curve
For a two slopes S-N curve, the damage corresponding to
one sea-state spectrum (Hs, Tz) is given as follow:
Spectral moments
6.2.1 The spectral moments of order n of the stress process
are given by:
⎧K
⎫
m′ – m
m
m′
Γ 1 + ----- ;A + ⎨ ----- ( 2 2m0 )
γ 1 + ------ ;A ⎬
2
K′
2
⎩
⎭
μ = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------m
⎛
⎞
Γ 1 + ----⎝
2⎠
A
∞
Mn =
∫ω
n
0
Assuming that the stress process is stationary and Gaussian,
the statistical parameters of the stress process are obtained
from the spectral moments as follow:
RMS =
July 2008
m0
: Coefficient taken equal to:
SQ ⎞ 2
A = ⎛ -----------------⎝ 2 2m ⎠
0
⋅ S ( ω ) dω
• RMS (Root Mean Square):
: Coefficient taking account of the change of
slope in the S-N curve, taken equal to:
K, m
: Parameters of the S-N curve above change of
slope
K’, m’
: Parameters of the S-N curve below change of
slope
T
: Reference duration
m0
: Spectral moment of order 0
Bureau Veritas
9
NI 539, Sec 1
Γ[X+1] : Complete Gamma function
The long-term damage is given as follow:
Γ[X+1;ν]: Incomplete Gamma function
D =
γ[X+1;ν] : Γ[X+1]- Γ[X+1;ν]
i
j
k
⋅ D i jk
ij k
SQ
: Stress range at change of slope on the S-N
curve.
6.3.4
Long-term damage
The long-term damage is the sum of the short-term damages, weighted by the probability of occurence of each
loading state, considering the number of stress cycles in this
loading state.
10
∑ Pr ⋅ Pr ⋅ Pr
where:
Pri
: Joint-Probability of (Hs, Tz) of the considered
sea-state in the scatter diagram
Prj
Prk
: Probability of occurence of each wave heading
: Probability of occurence of the considered
loading condition
: Short-term damage calculated in [6.3.2] or
[6.3.3].
Dijk
Bureau Veritas
July 2008