Dynamical Evolution of Asteroids Ovidiu C. Furdui Astronomische Rechen-Institut (ARI) Mönchhofstraβe 12-14, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY Characteristics of long-term dynamical evolution Orbits of asteroids Chaotic behaviour Most asteroids travel in fairly circular orbits, there are some notable exceptions. One of the most extreme of these is 3200 Phaethon. Another asteroid, 944 Hidalgo, is also thought by some to be a defunct comet because of its unusual orbit. Distribution and Kirkwood gaps 11 3.70 3.65 10 Semimajor axis (AU) The solar system is a fascinating place in the Universe. One century ago, it was thought that this place is dominated by order, where several well defined classes of celestial bodies are hierarchically disposed in space. But this image has radically changed in our days. Today, the advanced observational technique transforms the mysterious dots of light from the sky in well individualized bodies, with their own physical and dynamical characteristics, history and origin. Some of them have peculiar orbits, allowing a close encounter with the Earth, sometimes at distances very uncomfortable for us. Many observational data, enriched by theoretical results, reveal the «new» solar system as a tumultuous region, where millions of interplanetary bodies of different sizes follow their own orbital destinies, in a chaotic manner, where gravitational captures and collisional processes are current realities. 3.60 9 Semimajor axis Introduction 8 7 3.55 3.50 3.45 6 3.40 5 3.35 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Years Semi major axis variation of two test particles, with almost identical initial conditions, perturbed by Jupiter, in the planar, circular, restricted threebody problem. Motion is dominated by close encounters. 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Years Semi major axis variation of two test particles, with almost identical initial conditions, perturbed by Jupiter, in the planar, circular, restricted three-body problem. Motion is free of close encounters. Dynamical classifications Small bodies in the Solar System - Asteroid belt Within the main asteroid belt are groups of asteroids that cluster in certain orbital elements. Such groups are called families and assigned the name of the lowest numbered asteroid in the family. Asteroid families are thought to be formed when an asteroid is disrupted in a catastrophic collision. Theoretical studies indicate that such catastrophic collisions between asteroids are common enough to account for the number of families observed. About 95% of the known asteroids move in orbits between those of Mars and Jupiter. These orbits, however, are not uniformly distributed but exhibit "gaps" in the distribution of their semi major axes. These so-called Kirkwood gaps are due to resonances with Jupiter's orbital period. Gaps occur at 4:1, 7:2, 3:1, 5:2, 7:3, and 2:1 resonances, while concentrations occur at the 3:2 (Hilda group), 4:3 (Thule), and 1:1 (Trojan group) resonances. a) Dynamical evolution of asteroid (3753) Cruithne on a horseshoe-like orbit in respect to Earth; b). Dynamical evolutions of two Trojan asteroids, (1437) Diomedes and (1208) Troilus, on tadpole-like orbits in respect to Jupiter. All these motions are represented in corotational frames for 500 years. No close encounters take place. - Kuiper belt (old and scattered) Source regions and dynamical transport mechanisms - Comets (high e, unstable) - Dust (debris disks) Dynamics of close encounters When the asteroid moves inside the gravitational sphere of action of a planet, we consider that it makes a close encounter with that planet. ¾The restricted three-body problem Dynamical evolution of a fictitious asteroid placed in 3:1 mean motion resonance with Jupiter, having the following keplerian elements at the initial epoch JD 2451545.0: a = 2:4893663 UA, e = 0:326086, I = 5±:34915, - = 0±, ! = 0± and M = 33±:2367. The dynamical system in which this integration was performed is Sun-the four giant planets-asteroid. It becomes a NEA in about 100000 years. r 2 ⎧d r p ( 1 + mp ) r rp ⎪ 2 = −G rp3 ⎪ dt ⎨ 2r ⎡1 r r 1 r 1 r ⎤ ⎪d r ⎪ dt 2 = −G r 3 r + Gm p ⎢ d 3 ( r p − r ) − r 3 r p ⎥ p ⎣⎢ ⎦⎥ ⎩ ¾Hill’s equations ⎧ .. .. ⎛ 3 mp ⎞ ∂U H ⎪ξ − 2n p η = G ⎜⎜ 3 − 3 ⎟⎟ ξ = ap d ⎠ ∂ξ ⎪ ⎝ ⎨ . η ∂U H ⎪ .. ⎪η + 2n p ξ = −Gm p d 3 = ∂η ⎩ ¾Tisserand criterion ap a +2 a ( 1 − e 2 ) ⋅ cos I = T ( const .) ap Resonant motions ¾ geometric and the dynamical interpretation of this phenomenon, characterized by the libration of the resonant argument (in standard notations) σ p:q = pλp − qλ − ( p − q)ϖ p/q resonance ratio Variation of the resonant argument for the asteroid (4197) 1982 TA in respect to Jupiter. The transition between circulation and libration shows that the asteroid is captured in 10:3 mean motion resonance. Ovidiu Furdui, “Evolution of Celestial Bodies in the Vicinity of Earth’s Orbit ”, Master Thesis, 2003 C.D. Murray, S.F. Dermott, Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge University Press,1999 W.F. Bottke, R. Jedicke, A. Morbidelli, Understanding the distribution of near-Earth asteroids, Science, 288, 2000. A. Carusi, E. Dotto, Close Encounters of Minor Bodies with the Earth, Icarus 124, 1996 Ch. Froeschl´e, A. Morbidelli, The secular resonances in the solar system, in “Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 1993”, Kluwer Academic Publishers,1994. Near-Earth Object Dynamics Site (NEODyS). Asteroid Dynamic Site (ASTDyS). Minor Planet Center, The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Acknowledgements ¾Öpik’s geometric formalism Through a parametrization of the velocity vector u, we obtain the relations between its orientation in space and the corresponding heliocentric orbital elements of the body References Two types of dynamical behaviors of the MOID, computed for one thousand years: a) periodic orbital approach - the asteroid (1915) Quetzalcoatl; b) long-time orbital approach - the asteroid 1999 MN. I would like to express gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Rainer Spurzem, for his accurate guidance. I am also pleased to acknowledge the support which came from the staff of Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg, to print the present poster.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz