Occupational
Compensation
Survey
Preface
This bulletin surnrnarizes prty daL? frorn rhc 1992 Occupational
compensationSurveys of local Iabor ~nzuketsconducted by the Bureau of
~aborStatistics. In addition to Oiis S U H ~ I J bulletin,
I ~ ~ ~ ~ thc Burcau publishes a
.bulletinfor most individual iXciLS surveyed.
The primary objective of tllcse surveys, ~ o ~ ~ t l u c as
t c dptut of the Bureau's
Occupationtd Co~npcnsationStlrvey Progrill11(OCSY), is to clescribe the level
and distribution of occupational p:ry in il vilriely of thc Nn~ion'slabor
markets, using a consistent survey approach. Another ol)jective is to providc
infomation on the incidence of cmployce hcnefits among and within
localities. Although this publication docs not include benefits data, area
bulletins (listed in appendix 111-A, pages 122-124) present this infonnation
when available.
OCSP develops data that are used for a variety of purposes including wage
and salary administration, collective b;ugniriing, luld plant site determination.
In addition, the U.S. Department of Liibor uses this program's data in
administeriig [heService Contract Act of 1965.
OCSP data also help determine local p q adjustrncrlts under the Federal
Employees Pay Cornparability Act of 1990. To meet the Act's requirements,
the Bureau's White-Collar Pay and Area Waigc Survcy programs merged into
the OCSP. The merger resulted in: (1) the exp:uision of the survey's
industrial coverage to include all private nonfarm eslablislimer~ts(except
households) employing 50 workers or more md to irlclude State and local
governments; and (2) the addition of more survey occupations.
U.S. Department of Labor
Robert B. Reich, Secretary
This publication consists of the final two parts of a rluee-part bulletin. Part
11: Puy Comparisons, 1992 consists of relative pay levels which compare
broad occupationd groups in each area to 1992 national estimates (published
in Part I: Pay in he United States and Regiom, June 1992). Part Ill:
Locality Puy, 1992 presents occupational pay averages for areas surveyed by
the Bureau in 1992.
Along with Part I , this report was developed in the Bureau's Office of
Compensation and Working Conditions under the direction of George L.
Stelluto, Associate Co~lunissioner.Bruce J. Bergmm, Gayle C. Griffith, and
Elsie ha. Simpkins, of the Division of Occupational Pay Program prepared
Lhis bulletin. Carl B. Barsky, Richard W. Maylott, and J. Jon Virgin of the
Directorate of Survey Processing produced the tabulations.
Field economists from the Bureau's eight regional offices, under the
direction of the Assistant Regional Cornmissioners for Operations, collected
the survey data. Without the cooperation of the many private firms and
government jurisdictions Lhat provided pay data, this report would not have
been possible. The Bureau thanks all survey respondents for their
cooperation. For further information on this program, please call (202) 6066220.
Material in this bulletin is in the public domain and, with appropriate
credit, may be reproduced without permission. This information will be
made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone:
(202) 606-STAT; TDD phone: (202) 606-5897; TDD message referral phone:
1-800-326-2577.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Katharine G. Abraham,
Commissioner
April 1994
Part ill: Pay Comparisons, 1992
Part Ill: Locality Pay, 1992
Contents
Page
Part II: Pay Comparisons, 1992
lntroductlon
Page
Part Ill: Locality Pay, 1992
.......................................................................................................
2
lntroductlon
...................................................................................... 33
Tables:
Tables:
Pay relatlve-s for occupatlonal groups, selected areas:
Average pay In all Industrles, selected areas:
Bulletin 2439-2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1.
. . . . . . .All. .Induslrles
.......
A-2. ........Prlvale
..............Industry
..................
A-3.
Slate and local government
3
8-1.
6
8-2.
......................................................i1
8-5.
Pay relatives for occupatlonal groups, selected metropolltan areas:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-4.
. . . . . . .All. .Induslrles
.......
............................................
. ...............
A-5.
Prlvale Industry
A-6.
Slale and local government ......................................
14
17
.
.
21
Appendixes:
11-A.
I-.
Method of pay relallve cornputatlon ............................................
8-3.
8-4.
24
..................................................................
27
................................ 34
............................. . 46
........................................................ 50
Malntenanceand lwlroom occupatlons ......................................... 54
Malerlal movemsnl and cuslodld occupallons ............................. . 58
Professlonal and edmlnlstrauve occupallons
Technlcal and protective servlce occupations
Clerlcal occupallons
Average pay In prlvale Industry, selected areas:
8-6.
Professional and admlnlslratlve occupations
8-7.
...............................
Technlcal occupatlons ............................................................ 77
.......................................................
.....................................
.............................
8-8.
Clerlcal occupatlons
8-9.
Malnlenanceand loolroom occupallons
Malerlal movement and custodial occupallons
6-10
62
82
88
g3
OCSP area deflnltions
Average pay In State and local governments, selected areas:
................................
8-11.
Professlonal and admlnlslrallve occupallons
8-12.
Technlcal and protsctlve servlce occupallons
8-13.
Clerlcal occupallons
8-14.
Maintenance and loolroom occupallons
8-15.
98
.............................. 104
....................
.
.
...........................................108
.................................
112
Malerlal movemsnl and custodlal occupallons ...........................
116
Appendlxes:
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Q w o r n m n t
Printing OHim, Washington, DC 20402, G P O W s t o r o r , ond tlle
Publication Sales Centaf, Bureau d Labor Stst~alica. P 0.Box
2145. Chicago. C
I 60890.2145,
Il[-A.
111-8.
.........................
.
.
................ 120
. . . . . .
125
Smpe and method of survey
Occupallonaldesulpllons ...................................
Part II: Pay Comparisons, 1992
Introduction
Table A-1. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries,selected areas, 1992
(For each occupational group, average pay level for all lndustrles In the United States = 100)
Occupational group
Professional
Slate and area
Each year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys occupational pay in over 150
areas in the United States. Bulletins which summarize survey results for each area
may differ in occupational content and reference month. Coinparisons among
areas may be difficult to make because of the large volume of .data published.
Individual survey reports may contain wage and salary data for several dozen
occupations.
To facilitate pay comparisons, the Bureau developed measures of relative pay
levels for broad occupational groups. These measures, or pay relatives, express pay
levels from individual 1992 Occupational Compensation Survey areas as a percent
of the national pay level. In other words, pay relatives are the result of dividing
pay for an occupational group in a particular area by the corresponding national
pay level, and multiplying by 100.
Pay relatives
This publication presents separate pay relatives for all industries, private
industry, and State and local government for all areas in the Occupational
Compensation Survey Program (OCSP), where available. The pay relatives in
tables A-1 to A-3 represent how area pay compares to the national estimates (as
summarized in the A-series tables of Part 1:Pay in the United States and Regions,
June 1992). In contrast, tables A-4 through A-6 compare area data to
corresponding national estimates for metropolitan areas, only (based on the Cseries tables of Part 1: Pay in the United States and Regions, June 1992).
Tables present all OCSP areas which published estimates by broad industry
division. Because industrial coverage varied among survey areas, some areas may
not appear on each table. In addition, among areas publishing estimates at the
same industry level, there may be some with much more extensive industrial
coverage. See appcndix 111-A, table I (pages 122-124), for details about industrial
coverage.
All tables show relative pay levels for the following broad occupational groups:
Professional, Administrative, Technical, Clerical, Maintenance, and Material
Movement. In addition, the all industries and State and local government tables
display pay relatives for the Protective Service occupational group.
Appendixes
Appendix 11-A describes the method of pay relative computation used in the
OCSP. It also lists the specific occupational levels which comprise each of the
occupational groups used in pay relative calculations.
Appendix 11-B lists the geographical definitions of the 1992 OCSP areas.
Adrnlnistrative
Clerical
Technical
Overall
Accountants
Englneers
Overall
Programmers
-
-
-
-
101
94
87
Arizona
Phoenlx ...........................................................
-
-
-
-
-
100
Arkansas
Little Rock-North Llttle Rock
-
-
-
-
92
106
109
110
Prolectlve
service
Maintenance
&
~
Overall
Secretaries
-
91
90
93
-
95
-
88
86
95
-
91
-
-
90
-
87
87
107
108
111
124
-
-
112
114
113
106
103
105
114
1IB
100
109
116
124
103
105
106
130
116
93
102
114
128
100
112
108
111
114
116
105
107
103
117
117
98
98
99
103
100
analysts
I
I
II
Alabama
Huntsville
.....................
.
.....................................
I
...................................
Calllornla
Anohelm-Sanla Ana ..........................................
Los Angeles-Long Beach
Oakland .............................................................
Riverside-San Bernardlno
Sacramento
San Dlego ..............................................................
SanFranclsco
San Jose ..............................................................
Visalia-Tulare-Portervllle .....................................
.................................
...........................................................
....................................
.................................................
Colorado
Denver
I
....................................................................
-
-
-
103
-
105
-
102
107
-99
102
97
105
99
107
101
110
-
-
-99
95
105
--
-
109
112
107
108
115
103
99
102
110
105
104
101
105
100
102
1MI
101
-
-
-
97
-99
103
104
-
105
109
107
109
108
115
113
-
-
-
102
-
-
-
-
-
-
131
-
-
111
98
-
106
-
Connecticut
Danbuly ................................................................
New Brltaln .........................................................
-
102
-
Delaware
Wilmlngton ............................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
102
106
105
121
100
98
1M)
108
108
101
110
-
-
92
98
91
95
87
92
-
-
90
97
82
93
Dlstrlct of Columbla
Washington
-
-
-
-
100
101
100
100
100
Florlda
Bradenton
Miami-Hialeah .....................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater..........................
-
-
-
-
-
-
96
102
98
Georgla
Atlanla
Augusla
-97
-
97
97
-
-
-93
1MI
-
103
-
-
102
92
99
100
99
97
100
103
104
103
104
103
105
104
113
104
107
112
118
-
-
-
-
-
-
92
-
-
96
96
94
90
102
95
93
99
97
104
93
93
91
98
110
104
96
84
94
123
106
........................
.
...............................
.....................
..........................................
............................................................
llllnols
Chicago
..............................................................
lndlana
Elkhart-Goshen.....................................................
Evansville .............................................................
Gary-Hammond
lnd~anapoiis..........................................................
Soulh Bend-Mishawaka ....................................
....................
.
.
.........................
See footnotes a1 end of table.
-97
-
84
-
-98
98
96
-
98
98
97
95
-
-
-
-
-96
-93
-96
96
-
78
86
-
-
-
~
~
Part II: Pay Comparisons, 1992
Introduction
Table A-1. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries,selected areas, 1992
(For each occupational group, average pay level for all lndustrles In the United States = 100)
Occupational group
Professional
Slate and area
Each year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys occupational pay in over 150
areas in the United States. Bulletins which summarize survey results for each area
may differ in occupational content and reference month. Coinparisons among
areas may be difficult to make because of the large volume of .data published.
Individual survey reports may contain wage and salary data for several dozen
occupations.
To facilitate pay comparisons, the Bureau developed measures of relative pay
levels for broad occupational groups. These measures, or pay relatives, express pay
levels from individual 1992 Occupational Compensation Survey areas as a percent
of the national pay level. In other words, pay relatives are the result of dividing
pay for an occupational group in a particular area by the corresponding national
pay level, and multiplying by 100.
Pay relatives
This publication presents separate pay relatives for all industries, private
industry, and State and local government for all areas in the Occupational
Compensation Survey Program (OCSP), where available. The pay relatives in
tables A-1 to A-3 represent how area pay compares to the national estimates (as
summarized in the A-series tables of Part 1:Pay in the United States and Regions,
June 1992). In contrast, tables A-4 through A-6 compare area data to
corresponding national estimates for metropolitan areas, only (based on the Cseries tables of Part 1: Pay in the United States and Regions, June 1992).
Tables present all OCSP areas which published estimates by broad industry
division. Because industrial coverage varied among survey areas, some areas may
not appear on each table. In addition, among areas publishing estimates at the
same industry level, there may be some with much more extensive industrial
coverage. See appcndix 111-A, table I (pages 122-124), for details about industrial
coverage.
All tables show relative pay levels for the following broad occupational groups:
Professional, Administrative, Technical, Clerical, Maintenance, and Material
Movement. In addition, the all industries and State and local government tables
display pay relatives for the Protective Service occupational group.
Appendixes
Appendix 11-A describes the method of pay relative computation used in the
OCSP. It also lists the specific occupational levels which comprise each of the
occupational groups used in pay relative calculations.
Appendix 11-B lists the geographical definitions of the 1992 OCSP areas.
Adrnlnistrative
Clerical
Technical
Overall
Accountants
Englneers
Overall
Programmers
-
-
-
-
101
94
87
Arizona
Phoenlx ...........................................................
-
-
-
-
-
100
Arkansas
Little Rock-North Llttle Rock
-
-
-
-
92
106
109
110
Prolectlve
service
Maintenance
&
~
Overall
Secretaries
-
91
90
93
-
95
-
88
86
95
-
91
-
-
90
-
87
87
107
108
111
124
-
-
112
114
113
106
103
105
114
1IB
100
109
116
124
103
105
106
130
116
93
102
114
128
100
112
108
111
114
116
105
107
103
117
117
98
98
99
103
100
analysts
I
I
II
Alabama
Huntsville
.....................
.
.....................................
I
...................................
Calllornla
Anohelm-Sanla Ana ..........................................
Los Angeles-Long Beach
Oakland .............................................................
Riverside-San Bernardlno
Sacramento
San Dlego ..............................................................
SanFranclsco
San Jose ..............................................................
Visalia-Tulare-Portervllle .....................................
.................................
...........................................................
....................................
.................................................
Colorado
Denver
I
....................................................................
-
-
-
103
-
105
-
102
107
-99
102
97
105
99
107
101
110
-
-
-99
95
105
--
-
109
112
107
108
115
103
99
102
110
105
104
101
105
100
102
1MI
101
-
-
-
97
-99
103
104
-
105
109
107
109
108
115
113
-
-
-
102
-
-
-
-
-
-
131
-
-
111
98
-
106
-
Connecticut
Danbuly ................................................................
New Brltaln .........................................................
-
102
-
Delaware
Wilmlngton ............................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
102
106
105
121
100
98
1M)
108
108
101
110
-
-
92
98
91
95
87
92
-
-
90
97
82
93
Dlstrlct of Columbla
Washington
-
-
-
-
100
101
100
100
100
Florlda
Bradenton
Miami-Hialeah .....................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater..........................
-
-
-
-
-
-
96
102
98
Georgla
Atlanla
Augusla
-97
-
97
97
-
-
-93
1MI
-
103
-
-
102
92
99
100
99
97
100
103
104
103
104
103
105
104
113
104
107
112
118
-
-
-
-
-
-
92
-
-
96
96
94
90
102
95
93
99
97
104
93
93
91
98
110
104
96
84
94
123
106
........................
.
...............................
.....................
..........................................
............................................................
llllnols
Chicago
..............................................................
lndlana
Elkhart-Goshen.....................................................
Evansville .............................................................
Gary-Hammond
lnd~anapoiis..........................................................
Soulh Bend-Mishawaka ....................................
....................
.
.
.........................
See footnotes a1 end of table.
-97
-
84
-
-98
98
96
-
98
98
97
95
-
-
-
-
-96
-93
-96
96
-
78
86
-
-
-
~
~
Table A-1. Pay relatives for occupational groups, at1 industries, selected areas, 1992
Table A-I. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected areas, 1992
- Continued
(For each occupational group, avarage pay level for all industries in the United States = 100)
--
(For each occupationalgroup, average pay levet for ell industries in the United States = 100)
Occupationalgroup
Overall
Iowa
Davenport-Rock Island-Mdine
Kentucky
Loulsvllle
I
Accountants
I
Engineers
Omall
I
Administralive
Progrenmers
~~~~~~
I
I
I
I
State and area
Professional
I
Oregon
Podland
Salem .....................................................................
................................................................
...............................
Pennsylvanla
........................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Reading
Scranton-Wllkes-Barre ...........................................
...........................................................
Tennessee
Chattanooga
Memphls
Nashville .................................................................
Maryland
Bailimore ................................................................
Cumberland ..........................................................
...........................................................
.............................................................
Massachusetis
Boston ....................................................................
Lawrence-Haverhill ............................................
Worcester ................................ ..
Texas
Dallas
Houston
Longvlew-Marshall ..................................................
San Antonio
......................................................................
....................
........................................
.......................
...........................................................
Michigan
Detroit ....................................................................
Ulah
Salt Lake Clly-Ogden
Minnesota
Minneapolis-St. Paul ...........................................
St. Cloud ........................
.................................
.
.
Vermont
Burlington
Mlsslsslppl
Jackson ..................................................................
Montana
Billings
...............................................................
....................................
Wsconsln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah
Mllwaukee ...............................................................
New Jersey
Bergen-Pessaic .....................
Monrnouth-Ocean
Newark
.
.
.
......................
.............................
.................
............................................................
See footnoles at end ol table.
101
-
-
-99
95
-
-97
-95
99
104
103
1 07
-
99
-
101
1 02
--
101
-
103
101
97
91
-
-
-
97
98
100
87
-
99
110
-
.
.
.........................
.......................
97
102
99
103
90
97
95
98
-
103
93
102
-
99
--
1 02
104
-
98
-
1W
88
100
95
91
83
97
92
91
118
114
1M)
109
-82
88
93
90
89
93
90
83
97
94
1M)
-86
101
103
102
1 07
89
89
95
99
82
79
-91
-
A
67
100
98
-
91
1M)
-
-
98
86
98
103
99
111
112
99
114
96
100
96
94
97
--
98
98
98
100
104
101
gs
-
BO
02
93
-
-
98
-
-
-
-
-
79
91
89
87
-
-98
-46
-99
-93
90
93
92
98
-94
-
-
91
97
B2
97
90
1 07
84
101
101
99
101
-
-
98
-
-
102
1M
113
-
-
-
-
-
94
-
95
91
ffi
96
89
-
80
98
1W
1W
108
99
116
-
-
-
-
NOTE: Dashes indicate no data or that data did not meat publicalion critaria. Araas do not appear on this table
New York
Nassau-Suffoik .......................
New York ................................................................
Rochester
.............................................................
...................
Washington
Seattle
....................
...........................................
...................
.......
...............................................................
............................................
.
..................
Ohio
Cincinnati ..........................................................
Cleveland ................................................................
Columbus
...........................................
Vlrglnla
Norfolk-VirginiaBeach-Newport News
Richmond-Petersburg
Miasouri
Kansas Cily ...................................
st. LOUIS................... ...........................................
..
Stale and area
Technical
.........................
...................................
Loulslana
New Orleans
- Continued
-
-
t they had no
,
-
-
--
-
publishable data for these oocupational groups or for this level 01 industry detail.
-
98
Table A-1. Pay relatives for occupational groups, at1 industries, selected areas, 1992
Table A-I. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected areas, 1992
- Continued
(For each occupational group, avarage pay level for all industries in the United States = 100)
--
(For each occupationalgroup, average pay levet for ell industries in the United States = 100)
Occupationalgroup
Overall
Iowa
Davenport-Rock Island-Mdine
Kentucky
Loulsvllle
I
Accountants
I
Engineers
Omall
I
Administralive
Progrenmers
~~~~~~
I
I
I
I
State and area
Professional
I
Oregon
Podland
Salem .....................................................................
................................................................
...............................
Pennsylvanla
........................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Reading
Scranton-Wllkes-Barre ...........................................
...........................................................
Tennessee
Chattanooga
Memphls
Nashville .................................................................
Maryland
Bailimore ................................................................
Cumberland ..........................................................
...........................................................
.............................................................
Massachusetis
Boston ....................................................................
Lawrence-Haverhill ............................................
Worcester ................................ ..
Texas
Dallas
Houston
Longvlew-Marshall ..................................................
San Antonio
......................................................................
....................
........................................
.......................
...........................................................
Michigan
Detroit ....................................................................
Ulah
Salt Lake Clly-Ogden
Minnesota
Minneapolis-St. Paul ...........................................
St. Cloud ........................
.................................
.
.
Vermont
Burlington
Mlsslsslppl
Jackson ..................................................................
Montana
Billings
...............................................................
....................................
Wsconsln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah
Mllwaukee ...............................................................
New Jersey
Bergen-Pessaic .....................
Monrnouth-Ocean
Newark
.
.
.
......................
.............................
.................
............................................................
See footnoles at end ol table.
101
-
-
-99
95
-
-97
-95
99
104
103
1 07
-
99
-
101
1 02
--
101
-
103
101
97
91
-
-
-
97
98
100
87
-
99
110
-
.
.
.........................
.......................
97
102
99
103
90
97
95
98
-
103
93
102
-
99
--
1 02
104
-
98
-
1W
88
100
95
91
83
97
92
91
118
114
1M)
109
-82
88
93
90
89
93
90
83
97
94
1M)
-86
101
103
102
1 07
89
89
95
99
82
79
-91
-
A
67
100
98
-
91
1M)
-
-
98
86
98
103
99
111
112
99
114
96
100
96
94
97
--
98
98
98
100
104
101
gs
-
BO
02
93
-
-
98
-
-
-
-
-
79
91
89
87
-
-98
-46
-99
-93
90
93
92
98
-94
-
-
91
97
B2
97
90
1 07
84
101
101
99
101
-
-
98
-
-
102
1M
113
-
-
-
-
-
94
-
95
91
ffi
96
89
-
80
98
1W
1W
108
99
116
-
-
-
-
NOTE: Dashes indicate no data or that data did not meat publicalion critaria. Araas do not appear on this table
New York
Nassau-Suffoik .......................
New York ................................................................
Rochester
.............................................................
...................
Washington
Seattle
....................
...........................................
...................
.......
...............................................................
............................................
.
..................
Ohio
Cincinnati ..........................................................
Cleveland ................................................................
Columbus
...........................................
Vlrglnla
Norfolk-VirginiaBeach-Newport News
Richmond-Petersburg
Miasouri
Kansas Cily ...................................
st. LOUIS................... ...........................................
..
Stale and area
Technical
.........................
...................................
Loulslana
New Orleans
- Continued
-
-
t they had no
,
-
-
--
-
publishable data for these oocupational groups or for this level 01 industry detail.
-
98
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992 -Continued
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992
(For each 0 ~ ~ ~ p a t l 0group,
n a l average Pay level for private industly in the Unlted Slates = 100)
{For each occupationalgroup, average pay level lor private industry in the United States = 100)
I
Occupational group
Stale and araa
Mainlenance
Technlcal
Accountants
Overall
Alaska
Statewide Alaska
Clerical
Administrative
Professional
~
L
...................................................
I
1
Engineers
Overall
I
I
Overall
Programmers
-
I
I
Material
Secretaries
-
Florlda
Bradenton
Jacksonville ............................................................
Miami-Hialeah
...........................
Northwestern Florlda ..........................
Orlando ..............................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater
...............................................................
.......................
.
..
.
............
..........................
Alabama
Birmingham
Gadsdenand Annlslon
Huntsville ................................................................
Mobile .....................................................................
Monlgomely ...................
............................................................
...........................................
.....................................
Georgia
Atlanta
Augusta ..................................................................
Columbus
................................
Macon-Warner Roblns
Savannah
.......................
.
......................................
.........................
.
Arlzona
Phoenix
Tucson-Douglas
...................................................................
.....................................................
Arkansas
Fort Smllh
Lillle Rock-NorthLiltle Rock
...........................................
..............................................................
...............................................................
llllnols
Chicago
Joliet
.................................
..................................................................
.......................................................................
Callfornla
Anaheim-SanlaAna
Fresno ....................................................................
Los Angeles-Long Beach ............................ ....
Oakland
Oxnard-Ventura
Riverside-SanBernardino
Sacramento
...................................
SalinasSeaside.Monlerey
San Diego .............................................................
San Francisco ......................................................
San Jose
.............................,.....
...............
Vslie~o-Faidield-Napa...................
......
Vlsalla-Tulare.Porte~ille
...............................................
lndlana
Elkhart-Goshen
Evansville
Fort Wayne
Gary-Hammond ......................................................
Indianapolis
South Bend-Mishawaka..........................................
......................................................
.............................................................
...
..................................................................
....................
.
...................................
......................................................
......................................
......................
.....................................
.........................................................
Iowa
Davenport-Rock Island-Moiine
...................... .
. .
.
.
..
........,...............
.
.
Kansas
Topeka
Wichila
...............................
....................................................................
...................................................................
Kentucky
Louisville
...............................................................
Loulslana
Baton Rouge
New Orleans ...........................................................
Shreveport ..............................................................
...........................................................
Malne
Statewide Maine
Distrlct of Columbla
Washington .........................................................
See foolnotes at end of table.
100
100
100
1Cd
1M)
98
108
105
103
Professional
State and area
.....................................................
111
Maryland
Ballimore
Lower Eastern Shore
................................................................
..............................................
See footnotes at end of table.
Admlnistretive
Overall
Accountants
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
Clencal
Technical
Overall
-
-
94
97
-
89
105
-
-
93
99
98
92
Maintenance
Materlal
movement
-
-
Secretaries
94
92
95
92
90
95
97
82
-80
101
-
97
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992 -Continued
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992
(For each 0 ~ ~ ~ p a t l 0group,
n a l average Pay level for private industly in the Unlted Slates = 100)
{For each occupationalgroup, average pay level lor private industry in the United States = 100)
I
Occupational group
Stale and araa
Mainlenance
Technlcal
Accountants
Overall
Alaska
Statewide Alaska
Clerical
Administrative
Professional
~
L
...................................................
I
1
Engineers
Overall
I
I
Overall
Programmers
-
I
I
Material
Secretaries
-
Florlda
Bradenton
Jacksonville ............................................................
Miami-Hialeah
...........................
Northwestern Florlda ..........................
Orlando ..............................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater
...............................................................
.......................
.
..
.
............
..........................
Alabama
Birmingham
Gadsdenand Annlslon
Huntsville ................................................................
Mobile .....................................................................
Monlgomely ...................
............................................................
...........................................
.....................................
Georgia
Atlanta
Augusta ..................................................................
Columbus
................................
Macon-Warner Roblns
Savannah
.......................
.
......................................
.........................
.
Arlzona
Phoenix
Tucson-Douglas
...................................................................
.....................................................
Arkansas
Fort Smllh
Lillle Rock-NorthLiltle Rock
...........................................
..............................................................
...............................................................
llllnols
Chicago
Joliet
.................................
..................................................................
.......................................................................
Callfornla
Anaheim-SanlaAna
Fresno ....................................................................
Los Angeles-Long Beach ............................ ....
Oakland
Oxnard-Ventura
Riverside-SanBernardino
Sacramento
...................................
SalinasSeaside.Monlerey
San Diego .............................................................
San Francisco ......................................................
San Jose
.............................,.....
...............
Vslie~o-Faidield-Napa...................
......
Vlsalla-Tulare.Porte~ille
...............................................
lndlana
Elkhart-Goshen
Evansville
Fort Wayne
Gary-Hammond ......................................................
Indianapolis
South Bend-Mishawaka..........................................
......................................................
.............................................................
...
..................................................................
....................
.
...................................
......................................................
......................................
......................
.....................................
.........................................................
Iowa
Davenport-Rock Island-Moiine
...................... .
. .
.
.
..
........,...............
.
.
Kansas
Topeka
Wichila
...............................
....................................................................
...................................................................
Kentucky
Louisville
...............................................................
Loulslana
Baton Rouge
New Orleans ...........................................................
Shreveport ..............................................................
...........................................................
Malne
Statewide Maine
Distrlct of Columbla
Washington .........................................................
See foolnotes at end of table.
100
100
100
1Cd
1M)
98
108
105
103
Professional
State and area
.....................................................
111
Maryland
Ballimore
Lower Eastern Shore
................................................................
..............................................
See footnotes at end of table.
Admlnistretive
Overall
Accountants
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
Clencal
Technical
Overall
-
-
94
97
-
89
105
-
-
93
99
98
92
Maintenance
Materlal
movement
-
-
Secretaries
94
92
95
92
90
95
97
82
-80
101
-
97
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992 -Continued
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, prlvate industry, selected areas, 1992
(For each occupational group, average pay level for privale Industry In the United Slates = 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level lor private Industry In the United States = 100)
- Continued
Occupallonal group
I
...........................,.,....................................
..................... .....................
...
101
101
100
102
-
-46
102
104
-
.
-
-
-
104
102
95
104
103
98
108
108
-
107
113
97
-
-
97
W)
-
-
-
-96
-
-
-
-
--
-
89
-
--
97
99
97
99
1W
98
82
100
98
93
99
101
-
-
92
-
-
88
-
96
104
103
101
-
-
-
102
100
l(19
93
100
105
-
-
-
106
-
-
106
113
107
94
92
-
98
92
103
112
107
89
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
Nebrash
Omaha
.............................
.
.
...............................
-
-
-
-
-
-
............................................................. ................................................... -.......................... .
..................................
-
-
New Jersey
Atlanlic Ciiy
Bergen-Passaic ......................................................
Monrnouth-Ocean
Newark
See footnotes at end of table.
108
106
103
-98
-
.............................................................
-
-
-
North Carolina
Greensboro-Winston-SalemmHIgh.Polnt.................
Goldsboro
Secretaries
-
-
...................... .
..............................
....................................................
.....................
..................
.................... ................................
.
.
..........
..........................................................
-
Overall
-
............................
New York
Bingharnton
Nassau-Suffolk
New York
..................
Rochester
.....
Syracuse and Ullca-Rome .....................
Utlca-Rome
-
Maintenance
-
...............................
....
..............................................
-
102
100
Montana
Billings
Nevada
Las Vegas-Tonapah
100
98
...................................................................
.
..................
................................
................................... ................
10Q
101
99
Mlnnesda
Duluth
Minneapolis-St. Paul .........................
St. Cloud ...................
......
Mlssourl
Kansas City
St. Louls
Soulhern Missouri
-
Programmers
..........................
..........................
....
..................................................................
103
Overall
.
.
...........................................
...
Mlsslrslppl
Biloxl-Gullport and Pascagoula
Jackson
-
100
104
96
102
-
-
Engineers
.
.
.
................................
........................
...................
.................................
........................
Mlchlgan
Detroit ...................
Upper Peninsula ...................
z$$i
Accountants
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
99
103
104
99
111
102
106
106
I10
-
-
-
-
91
-
-
---
--
108
91
89
-
95
-
I
Clerical
Technical
Overall
Massa~huselts
Boston ..........................
LawrenceHavehill
Worcester
I
I
Administrative
Professional
State and area
Occupational group
I
I
97
96
108
-
82
-87
125
-
92
87
96
104
93
116
-
-
88
-
-
93
90
93
88
98
102
85
96
98
84
107
104
83
111
93
85
83
105
104
-
90
87
87
85
93
89
106
115
94
1OD
106
110
85
106
105
110
-
-98
100
-
104
89
109
94
1W
--
103
86
98
80
State and area
Material
movement
102
105
Professional
Overall
.
.
onto
Chclnnati
...............................
Cbveland .................... .......................................
Columbus ............................. ..............................
Lorain-Elyria .........................................................
Toledo
.......................................
..........................
.
.
..
.......................
.
Oregon
Portland
.................................................................
Pennsylvanla
Phlladelphla
..........................................................
.........................
...........................................
.
.
Pittsburgh
...............................
Reading .................................................................
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre
Rho* Island
Providence
..............................................................
South Carolina
Charleston .............................................................
Columbla-Sumter ................................................
Florence
Greenville-Spartanburg
..,...............
.................................................................
........................
Tennessee
Chattanooga
ClarksvllleHopklnsvllle
Memphis ................................................................
Nashville .................................................................
.......................................................
........................................
....................................................................
.......................................................
......................................................................
..................................................................
.................................................
................................... . .
San Antonlo ...........................................................
Wichita Falls-Lawlon-Altus ..................................
Texas
Abilene
105
121
100
118
-
104
101
-
-w
1
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Houston
Longview-Marshall
Rio GrandeTexas
Northwest
Valley...................................................
...........
Utah
Salt Lake Ciiy-Ogden
........................................
Vermont
Burlington
Statewide Vermont
I
...............................................................
...............................................
See lootnotes at end of table.
Accountants
Administrative
Englneers
Overall
Programmers
~~~~~
Clerical
Technical
Maintenance
Material
movernenf
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992 -Continued
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, prlvate industry, selected areas, 1992
(For each occupational group, average pay level for privale Industry In the United Slates = 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level lor private Industry In the United States = 100)
- Continued
Occupallonal group
I
...........................,.,....................................
..................... .....................
...
101
101
100
102
-
-46
102
104
-
.
-
-
-
104
102
95
104
103
98
108
108
-
107
113
97
-
-
97
W)
-
-
-
-96
-
-
-
-
--
-
89
-
--
97
99
97
99
1W
98
82
100
98
93
99
101
-
-
92
-
-
88
-
96
104
103
101
-
-
-
102
100
l(19
93
100
105
-
-
-
106
-
-
106
113
107
94
92
-
98
92
103
112
107
89
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
Nebrash
Omaha
.............................
.
.
...............................
-
-
-
-
-
-
............................................................. ................................................... -.......................... .
..................................
-
-
New Jersey
Atlanlic Ciiy
Bergen-Passaic ......................................................
Monrnouth-Ocean
Newark
See footnotes at end of table.
108
106
103
-98
-
.............................................................
-
-
-
North Carolina
Greensboro-Winston-SalemmHIgh.Polnt.................
Goldsboro
Secretaries
-
-
...................... .
..............................
....................................................
.....................
..................
.................... ................................
.
.
..........
..........................................................
-
Overall
-
............................
New York
Bingharnton
Nassau-Suffolk
New York
..................
Rochester
.....
Syracuse and Ullca-Rome .....................
Utlca-Rome
-
Maintenance
-
...............................
....
..............................................
-
102
100
Montana
Billings
Nevada
Las Vegas-Tonapah
100
98
...................................................................
.
..................
................................
................................... ................
10Q
101
99
Mlnnesda
Duluth
Minneapolis-St. Paul .........................
St. Cloud ...................
......
Mlssourl
Kansas City
St. Louls
Soulhern Missouri
-
Programmers
..........................
..........................
....
..................................................................
103
Overall
.
.
...........................................
...
Mlsslrslppl
Biloxl-Gullport and Pascagoula
Jackson
-
100
104
96
102
-
-
Engineers
.
.
.
................................
........................
...................
.................................
........................
Mlchlgan
Detroit ...................
Upper Peninsula ...................
z$$i
Accountants
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
99
103
104
99
111
102
106
106
I10
-
-
-
-
91
-
-
---
--
108
91
89
-
95
-
I
Clerical
Technical
Overall
Massa~huselts
Boston ..........................
LawrenceHavehill
Worcester
I
I
Administrative
Professional
State and area
Occupational group
I
I
97
96
108
-
82
-87
125
-
92
87
96
104
93
116
-
-
88
-
-
93
90
93
88
98
102
85
96
98
84
107
104
83
111
93
85
83
105
104
-
90
87
87
85
93
89
106
115
94
1OD
106
110
85
106
105
110
-
-98
100
-
104
89
109
94
1W
--
103
86
98
80
State and area
Material
movement
102
105
Professional
Overall
.
.
onto
Chclnnati
...............................
Cbveland .................... .......................................
Columbus ............................. ..............................
Lorain-Elyria .........................................................
Toledo
.......................................
..........................
.
.
..
.......................
.
Oregon
Portland
.................................................................
Pennsylvanla
Phlladelphla
..........................................................
.........................
...........................................
.
.
Pittsburgh
...............................
Reading .................................................................
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre
Rho* Island
Providence
..............................................................
South Carolina
Charleston .............................................................
Columbla-Sumter ................................................
Florence
Greenville-Spartanburg
..,...............
.................................................................
........................
Tennessee
Chattanooga
ClarksvllleHopklnsvllle
Memphis ................................................................
Nashville .................................................................
.......................................................
........................................
....................................................................
.......................................................
......................................................................
..................................................................
.................................................
................................... . .
San Antonlo ...........................................................
Wichita Falls-Lawlon-Altus ..................................
Texas
Abilene
105
121
100
118
-
104
101
-
-w
1
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Houston
Longview-Marshall
Rio GrandeTexas
Northwest
Valley...................................................
...........
Utah
Salt Lake Ciiy-Ogden
........................................
Vermont
Burlington
Statewide Vermont
I
...............................................................
...............................................
See lootnotes at end of table.
Accountants
Administrative
Englneers
Overall
Programmers
~~~~~
Clerical
Technical
Maintenance
Material
movernenf
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992
-Continued
Table A-3. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected areas, 1992
(Foreach occupational group, average pay levelfor prhale industry in the Unlted Stales = 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level for State and local government in United States = 100)
I
Occupational group
Occupational group
I
Prolesslonal
State and area
Administrative
Clerical
Technical
Vlrgln Islands or the U.S.
Overall
Accountenls
-
-
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
Maintenance
Overall
Secretaries
movement
............................
.
......I
Vlrginla
Norfolk-VlrginlaBeach-Newpcrt News
Richmond.Petersburg
...................
.............................................
West Vlrginla
Slatewlde West Virginla
I
..........................................
Wlnconsln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neeneh
Green Bay
Madlscn
Mllwaukee
....................................
.....................................
...................
..............................................................
.............................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
NOTE: Dashes indlcale no data or lhat data dld not meet publicalloncriteria. Areas do not appear on Ihis table if lhey
had na publishable data for these occupational groups or for this levelof industry delail.
See footnotes at end of table.
I
I
I
I
Table A-2. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected areas, 1992
-Continued
Table A-3. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected areas, 1992
(Foreach occupational group, average pay levelfor prhale industry in the Unlted Stales = 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level for State and local government in United States = 100)
I
Occupational group
Occupational group
I
Prolesslonal
State and area
Administrative
Clerical
Technical
Vlrgln Islands or the U.S.
Overall
Accountenls
-
-
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
Maintenance
Overall
Secretaries
movement
............................
.
......I
Vlrginla
Norfolk-VlrginlaBeach-Newpcrt News
Richmond.Petersburg
...................
.............................................
West Vlrginla
Slatewlde West Virginla
I
..........................................
Wlnconsln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neeneh
Green Bay
Madlscn
Mllwaukee
....................................
.....................................
...................
..............................................................
.............................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
NOTE: Dashes indlcale no data or lhat data dld not meet publicalloncriteria. Areas do not appear on Ihis table if lhey
had na publishable data for these occupational groups or for this levelof industry delail.
See footnotes at end of table.
I
I
I
I
Table A-3. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected areas, 1992 - Continued
Table A-3. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected areas, 1992
(For each occupalional group, average pay level lor Slate and local govemment in United States = 700)
- Continued
(FO~
each occupational group, average pay level for Slate and local government in United States = 100)
Occupational orow
Occupatianal
I
group
Slate and area
'
Professional
Adminlstratlve
I
I
Technical
PzG:
- ",gzi -Overall
Accountants
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
NOTE: Dashes indicate no data or that data did not meet publication criteria. Areas do not appear on this table if they had no
I
I
publishable data for these occupational groups or for this level o( industry detail
Maintenance
Material
movement
Table A-3. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected areas, 1992 - Continued
Table A-3. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected areas, 1992
(For each occupalional group, average pay level lor Slate and local govemment in United States = 700)
- Continued
(FO~
each occupational group, average pay level for Slate and local government in United States = 100)
Occupational orow
Occupatianal
I
group
Slate and area
'
Professional
Adminlstratlve
I
I
Technical
PzG:
- ",gzi -Overall
Accountants
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
NOTE: Dashes indicate no data or that data did not meet publication criteria. Areas do not appear on this table if they had no
I
I
publishable data for these occupational groups or for this level o( industry detail
Maintenance
Material
movement
Table A-4. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
Table A-4. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected metropolitan areas, 1992 -Continued
(For each occupallonal group, average Pay level for all industries in the Unlted States, metropolitan areas1= 100)
(For each occupational group, averege pay level for all Industries in the United States, metropolitan areas' = 100)
I
Occupational group
Professional
Slate and area
zx$s
Technical
Accountants
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
-
-
-
-
100
94
86
............................
-
-
-
-
-
103
............................... ..
-
-
-
-
92
91
108
109
110
107
108
115
103
69
102
110
Huntsville ................................................................
Arizona
Phoenlx ..........................
....
Calllornla
Anahelm.Santa Ana
Los hgeles-Long Beach
Oakland
........................................
Riverside-San Bernardlno
Sacramento
. ...........................
San Diego ...................
San Franclsco
San Jose ...............................................................
Vlsalia-Tulare-Pollervllle
..............................................
....................
......................................
.
.
.
....................
.........
.....................
........
.........................
...................
.......
...................
......................
.
.
...........
Colorado
Denver
Clerical
Overall
Alabama
Arkansas
Litlle Rock-North Little Rock
Admlnlstratlve
-
-
-
103
-99
105
102
1 02
-
107
-
-98
96
105
99
1 07
95
105
101
109
-
-
-
....................................................................104
-
1 02
-
Protective
SBNlCe
Maintenance
Material
movement
89
91
-
87
85
93
-
89
-
86
84
112
113
112
105
102
105
113
117
99
1 07
114
122
102
103
104
127
113
92
99
108
122
-
110
113
115
104
106
1 02
116
116
97
97
98
101
97
Overall
Secretaries
-
40
94
-
-
-
106
107
110
132
-
-
125
119
127
-
-
-
109
112
-
1 05
100
110
107
101
1 05
100
1 02
1M)
101
-
-
69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
106
94
-
Connecticut
Danbury ...................
....................................
New Britaln ..........................................................
-
-
-
-
-
1 02
96
-
103
-
104
108
106
109
106
112
108
Delaware
Wilmington ...........................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
101
105
103
114
100
t 00
100
100
100
103
98
97
107
107
100
107
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
92
97
90
94
97
91
-
-
89
95
79
87
-
-97
-98
103
103
104
.
.
.
.
.................................
Olstrlct 01 Columbla
Washinglon ......................
Florlda
Bradenton
..............................
MRml.Hlaleah ........................................................
Tampa-St. PetersburgGleanvater
...................... ,..
..........................
-
-
Georgle
Atlanta ........................
Augusta ..........................................................
.
...................................... -97
.....
llllnols
Chlcago
.................................................................. 103
lndlana
Elkhart.Goshen
............................
Evansville ...............................................................
Gary-Hammond
lndianapalls .........................................................
South Bend-Mishawaka......................
.....................
.
...................
.
.
............................
.
.
.
.........
95
-97
97
-
96
1M
98
-
93
1M)
-
103
-
-75
101
91
1W
98
95
103
105
103
110
103
107
110
114
94
-
-
93
89
101
94
92
99
97
104
93
93
89
97
107
102
94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91
-
96
-96
98
98
-94
-
-
Bi
-
-93
-
96
-
98
95
-
-78
85
-
98
97
81
91
101
-
See footnotes at end of table.
See lootnotes al end of labie.
Occupational group
I
I
I
I
I
Table A-4. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
Table A-4. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected metropolitan areas, 1992 -Continued
(For each occupallonal group, average Pay level for all industries in the Unlted States, metropolitan areas1= 100)
(For each occupational group, averege pay level for all Industries in the United States, metropolitan areas' = 100)
I
Occupational group
Professional
Slate and area
zx$s
Technical
Accountants
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
-
-
-
-
100
94
86
............................
-
-
-
-
-
103
............................... ..
-
-
-
-
92
91
108
109
110
107
108
115
103
69
102
110
Huntsville ................................................................
Arizona
Phoenlx ..........................
....
Calllornla
Anahelm.Santa Ana
Los hgeles-Long Beach
Oakland
........................................
Riverside-San Bernardlno
Sacramento
. ...........................
San Diego ...................
San Franclsco
San Jose ...............................................................
Vlsalia-Tulare-Pollervllle
..............................................
....................
......................................
.
.
.
....................
.........
.....................
........
.........................
...................
.......
...................
......................
.
.
...........
Colorado
Denver
Clerical
Overall
Alabama
Arkansas
Litlle Rock-North Little Rock
Admlnlstratlve
-
-
-
103
-99
105
102
1 02
-
107
-
-98
96
105
99
1 07
95
105
101
109
-
-
-
....................................................................104
-
1 02
-
Protective
SBNlCe
Maintenance
Material
movement
89
91
-
87
85
93
-
89
-
86
84
112
113
112
105
102
105
113
117
99
1 07
114
122
102
103
104
127
113
92
99
108
122
-
110
113
115
104
106
1 02
116
116
97
97
98
101
97
Overall
Secretaries
-
40
94
-
-
-
106
107
110
132
-
-
125
119
127
-
-
-
109
112
-
1 05
100
110
107
101
1 05
100
1 02
1M)
101
-
-
69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
106
94
-
Connecticut
Danbury ...................
....................................
New Britaln ..........................................................
-
-
-
-
-
1 02
96
-
103
-
104
108
106
109
106
112
108
Delaware
Wilmington ...........................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
101
105
103
114
100
t 00
100
100
100
103
98
97
107
107
100
107
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
92
97
90
94
97
91
-
-
89
95
79
87
-
-97
-98
103
103
104
.
.
.
.
.................................
Olstrlct 01 Columbla
Washinglon ......................
Florlda
Bradenton
..............................
MRml.Hlaleah ........................................................
Tampa-St. PetersburgGleanvater
...................... ,..
..........................
-
-
Georgle
Atlanta ........................
Augusta ..........................................................
.
...................................... -97
.....
llllnols
Chlcago
.................................................................. 103
lndlana
Elkhart.Goshen
............................
Evansville ...............................................................
Gary-Hammond
lndianapalls .........................................................
South Bend-Mishawaka......................
.....................
.
...................
.
.
............................
.
.
.
.........
95
-97
97
-
96
1M
98
-
93
1M)
-
103
-
-75
101
91
1W
98
95
103
105
103
110
103
107
110
114
94
-
-
93
89
101
94
92
99
97
104
93
93
89
97
107
102
94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91
-
96
-96
98
98
-94
-
-
Bi
-
-93
-
96
-
98
95
-
-78
85
-
98
97
81
91
101
-
See footnotes at end of table.
See lootnotes al end of labie.
Occupational group
I
I
I
I
I
Table A-4. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
- Continued
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
(For each occupationalgroup, average pay level for all Industries in the United Slates, metropolitanareas1= 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level for private Industry in the Uniled States, metropolitan areas1= 100)
Occupatlonal group
Prolessional
Slate and area
Overall
...............................................................
..................................................................... -
Oregon
Portland
Salem
Pennsylvania
Phlladeiphla ..........................................................
Pittsburgh
Readinp
.............................
Soranlon~Wllkes-Barre
....................
.
.
.
.
.............................
...................
........
......
...............................
.
Tsnnesme
ChattanoDga
Memphls
Nashville
...........................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
Texss
Dallas ......................................................................
Houston
LongvlewMarshall
....................
San Antonlo
Vermont
Burlington
..........................................
...........................
.
.
............................
v1glnl.a
Nafolk-VirginlaBeach-NewporlNews
Richmond-Peteraburg .............................................
...................
...................
.
.
.
......................................
-
Englneers
-
-
Overall
Programmers
-
-
97
-
-
-
-
-85
-
96
98
97
86
99
104
103
107
98
103
98
111
99
€4
100
98
97
98
-
-
-
-
102
100
-
~~~~~
98
91
-94
-
89
lo3
100
97
91
103
83
102
-
99
100
87
Technical
-
-
101
I
-
-
82
96
92
87
97
97
-
83
100
la2
102
108
92
88
89
89
93
97
80
78
-
90
91
91
-
-
88
85
-
91
97
88
105
81
96
100
103
101
95
83
97
-
-
-
-
-
96
99
83
92
98
-
n l
98
-
-
-
96
98
94
97
1 QO
99
101
W8consln
~pietonOshkosh.Neenah....................................
Milwaukee ..........................................................
--
-
-
--
-
' The 326 melropolitan areas In the Unlted States (excluding Alaska and Hawall) as establlehed by the U.S. Office of
113
110
98
104
88
93
90
98
-
-
87
92
89
-
-
-
-
-
99
-
98
85
80
94
97
-
-
94
95
90
83
-
--
-
94
-
95
Material
movement
87
-
88
90
93
Secretaries
98
95
90
89
-
-
88
97
98
-
-
95
98
-
109
-
Maintenance
Overall
-
112
-
Clerlcal
Pzzr
99
114
W~ehlngton
Seattle
Management and Budgel through October 1984.
-
101
100
.................................................................. .
.
..................... 99
...................
...................
...........
Utsh
Salt Leke CiWOgden
Accountants
Administrative
-84
122
-
~1
101
-
101
110
-
90
100
94
1 04
84
111
they had n o
Professional
Overall
Accountants
Administrative
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
Clerlcal
Systems
analysts
Technical
Maintenance
Material
movement
Overall
Secretaries
...........................
.
................................
..............................
...........................
93
83
91
89
89
96
88
90
81
80
93
81
84
I
93
90
94
-
-
95
99
Callfornla
Anahelm-Santa Ana ..............................................
Fresno
Los Angeles-Long Beach ......................................
Oakland
..............
Oxnard-Ventura
Rlverslde-San Bernardino .....................................
Sacramento ................................
Sallnas-Seaslde-Monterey....................................
Sen Dlego ..............................................................
San Francisco
San Jose ......................................
Vallelo-Fairfield-Napa ............................
Visalla-Tuiare-Porlervllle .....................................
109
91
111
111
111
102
98
100
100
113
114
102
98
109
Colorado
Co[orado Springs .................................................
Denver ...............................................................
90
97
87
97
--
103
107
102
109
1 05
112
108
102
-
103
119
102
1 1 0 7
Alabama
Blrmlngham .........................................................
Gadsden and Anniston
Huntsville
Mobile ...................................................................
Montgomery
..........................................
Arlzona
Phoenix
...................................................................
Arkansas
Forl Smith
Llttte Rock-North Little Rock
...................
.......
.............................
.................................
.................................................................
................................................................
...........................
......
.... ...................
...................................................
..........................
..............
Connecticut
.
.
..............................
Danbury .........................
New Britain ..........................................................
Delaware
Wilmington
NOTE: Dashes Indicate no data or that data did not meet publlcatlon criteria. Areas do not appear on this table
publishable data for lhese occupational groups or for this level of industry detall.
-t
State and area
............................................................
Dlstrlct of Columbia
Washington ............................
.
.
...........................
florlda
Bradenton .......................
Jacksonville
.........................
Mlaml-Hialeah ........................................................
Orlando .................................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Cleawaler
107
......................................
...............................
.
-
..........................
-
See tootnoles a1 end of table.
-
90
92
76
87
105
87
108
119
99
101
98
96
104
-
109
109
109
-
97
98
102
109
114
.
1
-
111
96
-
104
90
1
80
-
-
86
98
91
108
121
106
-93
102
97
-
Table A-4. Pay relatives for occupational groups, all industries, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
- Continued
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
(For each occupationalgroup, average pay level for all Industries in the United Slates, metropolitanareas1= 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level for private Industry in the Uniled States, metropolitan areas1= 100)
Occupatlonal group
Prolessional
Slate and area
Overall
...............................................................
..................................................................... -
Oregon
Portland
Salem
Pennsylvania
Phlladeiphla ..........................................................
Pittsburgh
Readinp
.............................
Soranlon~Wllkes-Barre
....................
.
.
.
.
.............................
...................
........
......
...............................
.
Tsnnesme
ChattanoDga
Memphls
Nashville
...........................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
Texss
Dallas ......................................................................
Houston
LongvlewMarshall
....................
San Antonlo
Vermont
Burlington
..........................................
...........................
.
.
............................
v1glnl.a
Nafolk-VirginlaBeach-NewporlNews
Richmond-Peteraburg .............................................
...................
...................
.
.
.
......................................
-
Englneers
-
-
Overall
Programmers
-
-
97
-
-
-
-
-85
-
96
98
97
86
99
104
103
107
98
103
98
111
99
€4
100
98
97
98
-
-
-
-
102
100
-
~~~~~
98
91
-94
-
89
lo3
100
97
91
103
83
102
-
99
100
87
Technical
-
-
101
I
-
-
82
96
92
87
97
97
-
83
100
la2
102
108
92
88
89
89
93
97
80
78
-
90
91
91
-
-
88
85
-
91
97
88
105
81
96
100
103
101
95
83
97
-
-
-
-
-
96
99
83
92
98
-
n l
98
-
-
-
96
98
94
97
1 QO
99
101
W8consln
~pietonOshkosh.Neenah....................................
Milwaukee ..........................................................
--
-
-
--
-
' The 326 melropolitan areas In the Unlted States (excluding Alaska and Hawall) as establlehed by the U.S. Office of
113
110
98
104
88
93
90
98
-
-
87
92
89
-
-
-
-
-
99
-
98
85
80
94
97
-
-
94
95
90
83
-
--
-
94
-
95
Material
movement
87
-
88
90
93
Secretaries
98
95
90
89
-
-
88
97
98
-
-
95
98
-
109
-
Maintenance
Overall
-
112
-
Clerlcal
Pzzr
99
114
W~ehlngton
Seattle
Management and Budgel through October 1984.
-
101
100
.................................................................. .
.
..................... 99
...................
...................
...........
Utsh
Salt Leke CiWOgden
Accountants
Administrative
-84
122
-
~1
101
-
101
110
-
90
100
94
1 04
84
111
they had n o
Professional
Overall
Accountants
Administrative
Engineers
Overall
Programmers
Clerlcal
Systems
analysts
Technical
Maintenance
Material
movement
Overall
Secretaries
...........................
.
................................
..............................
...........................
93
83
91
89
89
96
88
90
81
80
93
81
84
I
93
90
94
-
-
95
99
Callfornla
Anahelm-Santa Ana ..............................................
Fresno
Los Angeles-Long Beach ......................................
Oakland
..............
Oxnard-Ventura
Rlverslde-San Bernardino .....................................
Sacramento ................................
Sallnas-Seaslde-Monterey....................................
Sen Dlego ..............................................................
San Francisco
San Jose ......................................
Vallelo-Fairfield-Napa ............................
Visalla-Tuiare-Porlervllle .....................................
109
91
111
111
111
102
98
100
100
113
114
102
98
109
Colorado
Co[orado Springs .................................................
Denver ...............................................................
90
97
87
97
--
103
107
102
109
1 05
112
108
102
-
103
119
102
1 1 0 7
Alabama
Blrmlngham .........................................................
Gadsden and Anniston
Huntsville
Mobile ...................................................................
Montgomery
..........................................
Arlzona
Phoenix
...................................................................
Arkansas
Forl Smith
Llttte Rock-North Little Rock
...................
.......
.............................
.................................
.................................................................
................................................................
...........................
......
.... ...................
...................................................
..........................
..............
Connecticut
.
.
..............................
Danbury .........................
New Britain ..........................................................
Delaware
Wilmington
NOTE: Dashes Indicate no data or that data did not meet publlcatlon criteria. Areas do not appear on this table
publishable data for lhese occupational groups or for this level of industry detall.
-t
State and area
............................................................
Dlstrlct of Columbia
Washington ............................
.
.
...........................
florlda
Bradenton .......................
Jacksonville
.........................
Mlaml-Hialeah ........................................................
Orlando .................................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Cleawaler
107
......................................
...............................
.
-
..........................
-
See tootnoles a1 end of table.
-
90
92
76
87
105
87
108
119
99
101
98
96
104
-
109
109
109
-
97
98
102
109
114
.
1
-
111
96
-
104
90
1
80
-
-
86
98
91
108
121
106
-93
102
97
-
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occu~ationafgroups, Private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
or each occupatlonal group, average pay level for private industry in the United States, metropolitan areas' = loo)
- Continued
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
- Continued
(For each occupational group, average pay level for private industry in the United States, rnetrowlitan areas' = 100)
Occupationalgroup
Occupational group
I
State and area
I
I
I
Professional
I
Overall
Clerical
I
Technical
Accountants
Maintenance
analysts
Overall
Misslsslppl
Biloxi-Guifport and Pascagoula
....
Jackson .................................................................
-
-
Mlssourl
Kansas Clty ............................................................
st. Louts ...............................................................
100
98
101
96
88
.......................
92
97
Secretaries
88
90
Montana
Billings
..................................................................
-
84
83
Nebraska
Omaha
....................
...........................................
-
89
86
103
101
83
108
106
100
105
109
~ e Jersey
w
Atlantic City .............................................................
Monmouth-Ocean
Bergen.Passalc
..........................
.......................
-
..................................................
Newark .................................................................
New York
Binghamton ....................
Nassau-Suffolk
New York ................................................................
Rochester
Syracuse and Ulica-Rome ....................................
Utica-Rome
.
.
.
.
.............................
......................................................
.............................................................
........................
...............................
Ohlo
Cincinnati
..
........................ ................................
...............................................................
Cleveland ................................................................
Columbus
Lorain-Elyria ...........................................................
Toledo .....................................................................
Oregon
Portland
1 - 1 - 1
..........................
Rhode laland
Providence ..........................
See footnotes at end of table.
.......................
............
I
.
..............................
-
-
105
112
106
92
102
112
101
-
-
-
---
---
-
-
-
-
-
106
-
89
88
97
100
94
96
93
92
98
89
..................................................................
Pennaylvanla
Philadelphia .........................................................
Pittsburgh ....................
..........
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre............................
Reading
....
............................
93
105
94
82
.................
109
100
-
~ o r t hCarolina
Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High-Point
84
104
89
-
96
98
96
93
99
96
92
84
98
93
88
94
88
81
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occu~ationafgroups, Private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
or each occupatlonal group, average pay level for private industry in the United States, metropolitan areas' = loo)
- Continued
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
- Continued
(For each occupational group, average pay level for private industry in the United States, rnetrowlitan areas' = 100)
Occupationalgroup
Occupational group
I
State and area
I
I
I
Professional
I
Overall
Clerical
I
Technical
Accountants
Maintenance
analysts
Overall
Misslsslppl
Biloxi-Guifport and Pascagoula
....
Jackson .................................................................
-
-
Mlssourl
Kansas Clty ............................................................
st. Louts ...............................................................
100
98
101
96
88
.......................
92
97
Secretaries
88
90
Montana
Billings
..................................................................
-
84
83
Nebraska
Omaha
....................
...........................................
-
89
86
103
101
83
108
106
100
105
109
~ e Jersey
w
Atlantic City .............................................................
Monmouth-Ocean
Bergen.Passalc
..........................
.......................
-
..................................................
Newark .................................................................
New York
Binghamton ....................
Nassau-Suffolk
New York ................................................................
Rochester
Syracuse and Ulica-Rome ....................................
Utica-Rome
.
.
.
.
.............................
......................................................
.............................................................
........................
...............................
Ohlo
Cincinnati
..
........................ ................................
...............................................................
Cleveland ................................................................
Columbus
Lorain-Elyria ...........................................................
Toledo .....................................................................
Oregon
Portland
1 - 1 - 1
..........................
Rhode laland
Providence ..........................
See footnotes at end of table.
.......................
............
I
.
..............................
-
-
105
112
106
92
102
112
101
-
-
-
---
---
-
-
-
-
-
106
-
89
88
97
100
94
96
93
92
98
89
..................................................................
Pennaylvanla
Philadelphia .........................................................
Pittsburgh ....................
..........
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre............................
Reading
....
............................
93
105
94
82
.................
109
100
-
~ o r t hCarolina
Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High-Point
84
104
89
-
96
98
96
93
99
96
92
84
98
93
88
94
88
81
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992 -Continued
(For eachOccuPatiOnal
Table A-6. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
average pay level for private induslly In the United States, metropolitan areas' = 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level for State and tocal government in the United States, metropolltanareas' = 100)
-
i
Stale and area
South Carolina
Charleston ..............................................................
Florence .............................................................
Greenvilla-Spartanburg
..........................................
Tennessee
Chattanooga
ClarksvilleHopkinsviIle
Marnphls
Nashville
........................................................... .........................................
....................
.
.....................................
87
..............
.............................. -
-97
--98
---
-91
-
-
--
102
107
98
103
98
-
112
99
112
104
1W
115
97
103
98
95
97
89
98
99
101
104
101
-
97
-
-
-
-98
-94
-99
-
83
101
98
103
96
--
-
Texas
Abllene
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Houston
Longvlow-Marshall
SanAntonlo
....................... .
.
.
.............................. ......................................................... ...................................................................... 99
..................................................................104
.................................................. ............................................................ 102
Utah
Salt Lake Clly-Ogden
Vermont
Burlington
.............................................
...............................................................
Vlrginle
Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newpori News
Richmond-Petersburg
...................
.............................................
Washington
Seattle
...................................................................
Wlsconaln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah ..................................
Green Bay
Madison .......................
Milwaukee ...............................................................
.............................................................. .
................................... -
'
-
-
86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
The 326 rnnropolilan areas h the United States (excluding Alaska and Hawall) as established by Ihe US. m i c e
ol Management and Budget through October 1984.
-
-
-
100
90
-
-
88
-
-
-
94
90
83
78
95
95
88
95
92
-
-
-
-
92
102
104
94
102
106
-94
-
-
-
110
-
88
-
98
99
90
90
97
94
98
81
78
95
92
90
92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
93
88
97
89
87
89
108
81
97
-
97
100
100
111
-
93
93
93
97
95
86
96
-
88
93
94
97
87
93
91
97
-
-
98
-
-
-
98
7
-
.
94
73
-
94
-
-92
-
102
111
NOTE: Dashes indlcate no data or that data did not meet publication criteria. Areas do not appear on his table If they
had no publishabledata for these occupationatgroups or for this level ol industry detail.
l
See footnotes at end of table.
Occupational group
I
I
I
Table A-5. Pay relatives for occupational groups, private industry, selected metropolitan areas, 1992 -Continued
(For eachOccuPatiOnal
Table A-6. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
average pay level for private induslly In the United States, metropolitan areas' = 100)
(For each occupational group, average pay level for State and tocal government in the United States, metropolltanareas' = 100)
-
i
Stale and area
South Carolina
Charleston ..............................................................
Florence .............................................................
Greenvilla-Spartanburg
..........................................
Tennessee
Chattanooga
ClarksvilleHopkinsviIle
Marnphls
Nashville
........................................................... .........................................
....................
.
.....................................
87
..............
.............................. -
-97
--98
---
-91
-
-
--
102
107
98
103
98
-
112
99
112
104
1W
115
97
103
98
95
97
89
98
99
101
104
101
-
97
-
-
-
-98
-94
-99
-
83
101
98
103
96
--
-
Texas
Abllene
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Houston
Longvlow-Marshall
SanAntonlo
....................... .
.
.
.............................. ......................................................... ...................................................................... 99
..................................................................104
.................................................. ............................................................ 102
Utah
Salt Lake Clly-Ogden
Vermont
Burlington
.............................................
...............................................................
Vlrginle
Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newpori News
Richmond-Petersburg
...................
.............................................
Washington
Seattle
...................................................................
Wlsconaln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah ..................................
Green Bay
Madison .......................
Milwaukee ...............................................................
.............................................................. .
................................... -
'
-
-
86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
The 326 rnnropolilan areas h the United States (excluding Alaska and Hawall) as established by Ihe US. m i c e
ol Management and Budget through October 1984.
-
-
-
100
90
-
-
88
-
-
-
94
90
83
78
95
95
88
95
92
-
-
-
-
92
102
104
94
102
106
-94
-
-
-
110
-
88
-
98
99
90
90
97
94
98
81
78
95
92
90
92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
93
88
97
89
87
89
108
81
97
-
97
100
100
111
-
93
93
93
97
95
86
96
-
88
93
94
97
87
93
91
97
-
-
98
-
-
-
98
7
-
.
94
73
-
94
-
-92
-
102
111
NOTE: Dashes indlcate no data or that data did not meet publication criteria. Areas do not appear on his table If they
had no publishabledata for these occupationatgroups or for this level ol industry detail.
l
See footnotes at end of table.
Occupational group
I
I
I
I
I
Table A-6. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected metropolitan areas, 1992 -Continued
I
(For each occupationalgroup, average pay level for State and local government in Ihe Unlted States, metropolitanareas1= 100)
Table A-6. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
- Continued
(Foreach occupationalgroup, average pay level for State and local government In the Uniled States, metropolitan areas1 = 100)
Occupatlonalgroup
Occupational group
I
I
I
Wlsconaln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah
.................................
...............................................................
'
The 328 metropolitan areas in the United Statee (excluding Alaska and Hawaii) as established by the U.S. m i c e of
Management and Budget lhrough Oclober 1984.
.............................................................. .
.
........................ .............................................................. -
Cincinnati
Cleveland ................................
Columbus
See foolnotes at end of table.
106
88
-
101
91
-
98
101
lM
105
102
I-
-
-
93
92
94
1M)
102
88
102
108
102
93
101
87
-94
NOTE: Dashes indicate no data or that data did not meet publlcallon criteria. Areas do not appear on thls table E they had no
publishable data for these occupallonal groups or lor thls level of industry detail.
I
I
Table A-6. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected metropolitan areas, 1992 -Continued
I
(For each occupationalgroup, average pay level for State and local government in Ihe Unlted States, metropolitanareas1= 100)
Table A-6. Pay relatives for occupational groups, State and local government, selected metropolitan areas, 1992
- Continued
(Foreach occupationalgroup, average pay level for State and local government In the Uniled States, metropolitan areas1 = 100)
Occupatlonalgroup
Occupational group
I
I
I
Wlsconaln
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah
.................................
...............................................................
'
The 328 metropolitan areas in the United Statee (excluding Alaska and Hawaii) as established by the U.S. m i c e of
Management and Budget lhrough Oclober 1984.
.............................................................. .
.
........................ .............................................................. -
Cincinnati
Cleveland ................................
Columbus
See foolnotes at end of table.
106
88
-
101
91
-
98
101
lM
105
102
I-
-
-
93
92
94
1M)
102
88
102
108
102
93
101
87
-94
NOTE: Dashes indicate no data or that data did not meet publlcallon criteria. Areas do not appear on thls table E they had no
publishable data for these occupallonal groups or lor thls level of industry detail.