The Effect of Galvanically Induced Corrosion Damage on the Fatigue Crack Formation Behavior of AA 7050-T7451 Noelle Easter Co and Prof. James Burns Center for Electrochemical Science and Engineering Motivation Results The use of stainless steel fasteners in aircraft with aluminum substructure creates a galvanic couple when exposed to atmospheric conditions, T leading to the formation of galvanic corrosion damage. Collaborative research program is in place to quantify, understand and model this behavior. S Step 2: Study the microstructure interactions Step 1: Geometry dependent modeling to determine the the chemistry, pH and potential distribution for a AA 7050CRES304 galvanic couple (C Liu/RG Kelly) and establish the corrosion morphology associated with these conditions. (V Rafla/JR Scully) µm 0 L 100 CORROSION DAMAGE CHARACTERIZATION S T µm 0 0 50 100 150 1 mm Discrete Pits 1 mm 200 µm 200 50 300 100 400 150 500 200 600 250 700 300 800 350 1 mm 900 Surface Recession NM 400 NM IGC 1000 L Discrete Pits Water layer IGC T Stainless steel fastener Primer/Top Coating Surface Recession Top view images of the corroded LS surfaces using the white light interferometer (top) and optical microscope (bottom) The white light interferometer is able to capture the 3D features as well as the true depths of discrete pits and surface recession. However it is L not capable of determining the true depth of the IGC fissures. AA 7050 - T7451 substructure S Corroded LS surfaces(top) and their corresponding fracture surfaces (bottom) QUANTIFICATION OF CRACK FORMATION AND SMALL CRACK GROWTH BEHAVIOR Step 3: Determine the influence of varying morphology on the fatigue behavior and structural integrity of AA 7050-T7451 IDENTIFICATION OF CORROSION DAMAGE FEATURE *52 μm *Average pit depth where primary crack initiates Knowledge Gaps 1. How do corrosion morphologies typical of galvanic couples influence overall fatigue life behavior in AA 7050-T7451? 2. What features of the corrosion morphology influence the fatigue crack formation and small crack growth behavior of AA 7050-T7451? *165 μm *633 μm Objectives Histogram of pit depths and crack initiation sites for discrete pits (left) and for IGC (right) Taking all the pit depth measurements, cracks do not initiate at the deepest pit for both discrete pits and IGC. However, among all initiation sites (primary and secondary), the initiation site of the primary crack is the deepest. Most secondary cracks initiated at shallow discrete pits (lower tail end of the histogram). 1. Characterize the corrosion damage induced under electrochemical Plot of total fatigue life and initiation life to create a 10 um Pit depth does not dictate the location of the initiation site, condition representative of a galvanic crevice in atmospheric crack size (right) conditions this points toward a strong effect of micro-geometry or Fracture surface with marker bands is used to quantify the 2. Quantify the crack formation and small crack growth behavior for microstructure. microstructurally small scale fatigue crack growth (left) Initiation site for secondary crack different galvanically induced corrosion morphologies Samples with discrete pits have the highest total fatigue life, whereas 3. Identify the salient features of the corrosion damage that govern the samples with surface recession have the shortest total fatigue life. crack formation behavior for each morphology Samples with longer initiation life have higher total fatigue life. (1) (2) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Experimental Approach AA7050-T7451 fatigue specimens polished to 600 grit Wt % Balance S 6.1 Mg Zr Fe 2.2 2.2 0.11 0.08 L Fatigue specimen Si 0.04 Ti 0.02 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 A1 Discrete Pits A2 A3 Surface Recession 1.00E-05 B2 1 mm 1 mm B3 (5) IGC C1 C2 C3 500 1000 1500 (1) SEM image of corroded surface (2) optical image of corroded surface (3) SEM image of the fracture surface (4) white light interferometer image of the corroded surface (5) 3D image of the corrosion damage 2000 Plot of crack growth rate (da/dN) versus crack length (a) for all fatigue samples with crack lengths 7-day hold inside the obtained from marker band spacing RH chamber at 96% RH and 30oC with Once crack extends 50-100 μm beyond the corrosion damage, the droplet of 1 M NaCl + growth rates merge and are consistent with each condition, thus 0.022 M AlCl3 + 0.05 M K2S2O8 on top of supporting the conclusion that crack formation life and corrosion the exposed area feature depth dominate any secondary effect of crack propagation generates IGC. behavior. Microstructurally small fatigue crack growth behavior becomes independent of the micro-feature when the crack extends away from the initiation point. 3D profile obtained using white light interferometer Conclusions Top view obtained using optical microscope LOADING PROTOCOL: Constant maximum stress: 200 MPa Baseline cycle: R=0.5, f=20 Hz Marker cycle: R=0.1, f=10 Hz Fatigue specimen loaded in hydraulic frame with flexi-glass chamber to control humidity; loading direction is along L. FRACTOGRAPHY Fracture surfaces investigated using the scanning electron microscope References Load induced fracture marks (marker bands) are produced on the fracture surface. The micro-feature of the crack initiation site for discrete pits and surface recession corrosion damage can be characterized by the combination of 2D and 3D imaging techniques. XCT will be used for IGC. Even for surface recession, cracks do not initiate at the deepest portion of the damage pit. Combination of 2D and 3D imaging techniques is necessary to identify the micro-features where crack initiates. Future Work x-ray computed 1. Successfully developed and characterized corrosion damage typical 1. Use tomography (XCT) to locate of the galvanic couples secondary cracks and 2. Crack formation life and feature size dominate the total fatigue life; constituent particles with morphology influence on small scale crack propagation diminishes respect to the corrosion after 50-100 μm beyond corrosion damage. damage (particularly for IGC) 3. Macro-scale corrosion features do not fully capture the crack 2. Use EBSD to formation behavior; 2D-3D techniques have been successfully determine the utilized to characterize micro-geometry features of surface influence of recession/pits. crystallographic 4. XCT and EBSD techniques have been initially employed to orientation on characterize IGC morphology and to identify microstructure the crack growth features pertinent to crack formation. behavior DATA ANALYSIS da/dN vs crack length (a) plot determined using marker band spacing 600 Initiation site for primary crack B1 3D profile and top view of generated pits obtained using interferometer and optical microscope Specimens with pits in the reduced-gage section subjected to fatigue test with a predetermined loading protocol at 90% relative humidity 550 Crack length a (μm) 72-hour potential hold at -700 mV with 0.5 M NaCl + 8x10-4 M NaAlO2 (pH 8) generates surface recession. 450 µm 0 1.5-hour potential hold at -700 mV with 0.5 M NaCl + 8x10-4 M NaAlO2 (pH 8) generates discrete pits. 400 (3) 1.00E-06 IMAGE ANALYSIS FATIGUE TEST 1 mm 500 CORROSION GENERATION 2mm x 2mm area in the reduced-gage section (LS surface) of the fatigue specimen exposed to different electrochemical conditions 1 mm (4) Grain width: L: 22-1230 μm S: 12-112 μm T: 14-264 μm S L 350 1.00E-02 T T 1.00E-01 da/dN, (um/cycle) SAMPLE PREPARATION AA 7050- T7451 Composition: Element Al Zn Cu Crack growth rate vs crack length 1. 2. Burns, J.T., J.M. Larsen, and R.P. Gangloff, Effect of initiation feature on microstructure-scale fatigue crack propagation in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012. 42(0): p. 104-121. Spear, A.D., Li, Shiu Fai, Lind, J.F., Suter, R.M. and Ingraffea, A.R., Three-dimensional characterization of microstructurally small fatigue-crack evolution using quantitative fractography combined with post-mortem X-ray tomography and high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy. Acta Materialia Inc. 1mm XCT image (top), fracture surface (bottom left), EBSD image (bottom right) Acknowledgement This work is funded by the US Office of Naval Research (B. Nickerson).
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz