NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DIVISION OF FAMILY HEALTH
BUREAU OF EARLY INTERVENTION
NYS EARLY INTERVENTION
PROGRAM
REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE JANUARY 1, 2006 – DECEMBER 31, 2006
New York State Department of Health Division of Family Health Bureau of Early Intervention
Early Intervention Program Annual Report to the Legislature January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006 Under Section 2557 of the Public Health Law (PHL), the Department of Health is
required to prepare and submit an annual report to the Governor and Legislature,
covering the period January 1 through December 31 with respect to certain
aspects of the Early Intervention Program (EIP). Specifically, the Department is
required to report data, by municipality, on the EIP for the purposes of improving
the efficiency, cost effectiveness, and quality of the EIP. This report covers the
period from January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006.
Data Collection Methods
Since the inception of the EIP, the Department has supplied municipalities with a
software application, known as the Kids Integrated Data System (KIDS), to use
for the collection of data, local management of EIP activities, payment of bills
submitted by providers, and processing of claims to commercial insurers,
Medicaid, and the Department. The Department maintains the KIDS application
and periodically issues revised versions of the application to municipalities to
meet new program requirements and/or improve data collection capabilities.
All fifty-eight municipalities use KIDS for data collection and to assist with the
management of program activities. All municipalities, with the exception of New
York City, use the billing and claiming components of KIDS. New York City has a
contract for its provider payment and claiming processes. The following other
counties also used fiscal agents during the current reporting period to manage
their claiming procedures, but use KIDS for claims processing: Dutchess, Erie,
Genesee, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans, Suffolk, and Wayne.
KIDS is a distributed data system. Data are collected locally using KIDS and
submitted to the Department on a quarterly basis. The Department maintains
and regularly updates its state-level database on the EIP, using quarterly data
submitted by municipalities. This state-level database is used by the Department
for program management purposes and to comply with federal and State
reporting requirements, including this report.
In addition to KIDS, the Department maintains a Fiscal System application, which
it uses to process all claims submitted by municipalities for State reimbursement.
In accordance with State law, municipalities must submit claims for payment
within two years of the date of service.
Page 1 of 6
Data Table Descriptions and Data Limitations
Section 2557 of PHL requires the Department to report on data collected from
January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. Child and provider data included
in this report are based on data submitted to the Department by municipalities in
February, 2007 and are complete through December 31, 2006. Medicaid data
were supplied by the Office of Medicaid Management, using the Medicaid
Management Information System.
As required under Section 2557(4) of PHL, data are reported by county, New
York City, and Rest of State excluding New York City, and State.
The following describes the data included in each of the tables, along with
limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data.
Table 1 presents the number of children enrolled in the EIP by age. Children
with an IFSP continuing in the program were assigned to an age group based on
their age on January 1, and children entering the program in 2006 were assigned
to an age group based on their age on the date of the initial IFSP.
Tables 2 and 3 present the number and percent of children authorized to receive
a single service and authorized to receive multiple services, respectively, by type
of service.
For the purposes of these analyses, service coordination,
evaluations, transportation, assistive technology devices, and respite services
are excluded. For Table 2, a child was counted as receiving a single service if
s/he was authorized to receive only one type of general early intervention service
(e.g., physical therapy only, speech therapy only, or occupational therapy only.)
during the entire time period, regardless of the length of time during the reporting
period for which the service was authorized. For example, if a child received an
initial IFSP in October, and was authorized to receive speech language therapy
and no other service for the months of November and December, the child was
counted as receiving a single service. For Table 3, a child was counted as
receiving multiple services if s/he was authorized to receive two or more services
at any time during the entire time period, regardless of whether authorizations for
each type of service were overlapping or consecutive (e.g., consecutive weeks,
months, etc. in the period January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006). Each child
was counted under every service type for which they were authorized during this
twelve-month period. For example, if a child received an initial IFSP in July, was
authorized to receive physical therapy in September, and occupational therapy in
December, the child was counted as receiving multiple services, and was
counted under both service types. As a result of children being counted
repeatedly across different service types, the sum of percentages across the
service types is more than 100%.
Page 2 of 6
.
Table 4 presents the number of State-approved agencies 1 and independent
(individual) service providers that were under direct contract with one or more
municipalities, and therefore were available to provide services to children during
this time period, by service specialty, in full-time equivalents (FTEs). Agency and
individual providers that are only approved by the Department and not reported
as under contract, either by a municipality or by an approved agency (for
individuals), are not included. These data are derived from applications
submitted by providers at the time State approval is sought, and do not include
changes after the initial application to the Department. Provider contract status is
reported periodically to the Department by municipalities. These data likely
under represent the current FTEs available to deliver early intervention services,
particularly for agency providers.
Tables 5 and 6 present the number and percent of children authorized to receive
a single service and multiple services, respectively, by the type of provider
authorized to deliver the service(s) to the child. Table 5 displays the data by
agency and individual provider. Table 6 presents the data by agency only,
individual only, and both individual and agency, since children authorized to
receive multiple services may be authorized to receive services from both
agencies and individual providers.
Table 7 displays the number of State-approved providers under contract with
municipalities to provide evaluations, and the number and percent of evaluators
who delivered services to children whom they evaluated.
Table 8 displays the number and percent of children whose families were
authorized to receive supportive services, which are defined as family training,
counseling, parent support groups, or respite.
Table 9 displays the number and percent of children who were reported to have
some form of third party insurance coverage during the reporting period.
Children with unknown insurance status had no commercial insurance coverage
or Medicaid coverage information reported during the time period.
Table 10 displays the number and percent of claims submitted to commercial
insurers and the claims denied by insurers that were reconciled during the
reporting period. Data submitted by municipalities using KIDS include claims
submitted to insurers prior to January 1, 2006 that were subsequently denied,
paid, or partially paid by insurers and reconciled between January 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2006. Data reported by fiscal agents under contract with
1
Under EIP regulations, an agency means incorporated entities, sole proprietorships, partnerships, and state
operated facilities operating under the approval of any state early intervention agency. “Individual”
providers means qualified individuals with appropriate licensure, certification, or registration identified as
qualified personnel for purposes of the EIP.
Page 3 of 6
municipalities to perform claiming functions include only those claims that were
both submitted and reconciled during the period.
Table 11 displays the number and percent of claims submitted by municipalities
that were denied by commercial insurers by reason of denial. The following are
definitions used to report reasons for denial of claims by insurers:
• Service Not Covered - Denial of payment by an insurer for a service
known to be in the child benefit package, for one of the following reasons:
not a covered service, equipment, or device; or denied based on location
of service (e.g., home or community setting).
• No Response from Insurer - No response from an insurer after repeated
contact attempts by the municipality.
• Other Denial - Denial of payment for any reason other than those
mentioned.
• Not Medically Necessary - Denial of payment by an insurer when
preauthorization was sought and denied by the insurer or when the insurer
has determined, independent of any preauthorization requirement, that the
service was not medically necessary.
• Out-of-Network Provider - Denial of payment by an insurer based on the
use of a non-participating provider.
• No Preauthorization Obtained - Denial of payment because
preauthorization for the service was required, but was not sought and/or
obtained by the municipality. Several municipalities indicated to the
Department that this field was also used to report denials when
preauthorization was sought, and the insurer denied the preauthorization.
• Benefits Exhausted - Denial of payment when policy limits have been
reached (either visit limits or amount of reimbursement). This includes
claims not submitted by municipalities to insurers upon notification that
benefits have been exhausted.
• Exceeds Insurer’s Claiming Limit - Denial of payment by an insurer when
the claim exceeds the timeframe from date of service required by the
insurer.
• Child Not Covered - Denial of payment by the insurer for services
delivered to a child at a time when the child was not covered by the
insurer (e.g., policy terminated or not renewed or services provided prior
to the effective date).
• No Primary Care Physician Referral - Denial of payment by an insurer for
failure to obtain a referral from the primary care provider prior to the
provision of services (including evaluation services).
• Technical Errors - Denial of payment by an insurer due to technical errors
on the claim, such as incorrect policy number, incorrect procedure code,
incorrect or missing diagnosis, incorrect date of service, or duplicate dates
of service.
• Government Service Blanket Rejection - Denial of payment by an insurer
because the service was provided by a governmental program.
Page 4 of 6
Tables 12 and 13 display the number and amount of claims submitted to
Medicaid by payment status (Table 12), and reasons for denial of claims (Table
13).
Department Guidance and Oversight of the EIP
The Department used these and other data to improve ongoing state-level
management and oversight of the EIP through the actions described below.
• A statewide monitoring system to review municipal administration of the
EIP and agency and individual providers engaged in the service delivery
system. Through its contractor, IPRO, the Department has completed two
cycles of monitoring for all agency and individual providers contracted to
deliver early intervention services and is in the process of completing a
second monitoring cycle of the 58 municipalities as service providers. In
addition, one monitoring cycle of the municipalities as local administrator
has been completed and another is planned to begin in 2007. A total of
1,906 comprehensive reviews were conducted during the first cycle of
monitoring and 941 during the second cycle to date. Corrective Action
Plans (CAPs) are required and submitted when deficiencies are identified.
Immediate remediation of serious deficiencies is required, with municipal
oversight of remediation efforts. Focused site reviews are also conducted
to ensure remediation has been completed according to the terms of the
approved corrective action plan.
• Implementation of an auditing program for the EIP, including development
and dissemination of an audit protocol for use in auditing providers and
municipalities by the Department, and development of data-driven criteria
to prioritize provider audits.
• Continuation of State-level matches of the EIP and Medicaid eligibility files
to submit retroactive claims for federal Medicaid reimbursement. To date,
more than $85 million in federal reimbursement has been achieved
through this process since 2001.
• The Department continues work to develop a state-of-the-art web-based
data system to replace the EIP’s aging legacy system, KIDS. Known as
the New York State Early Intervention System (NYEIS), the new system
will handle current and future business, statutory, and regulatory
requirements and will employ proven hardware and software technology to
ensure that data security meets defined performance standards, is cost
effective, and easy to maintain and operate. NYEIS will provide controls
to support EIP’s legal and financial responsibilities and protect EIP’s
administrative and managerial integrity.
Page 5 of 6
While NYEIS will serve EIP’s most urgent needs, it will also provide a
basis on which additional functional modules can be deployed as needed.
It will provide the EIP with effective and efficient management tools on the
State and local levels for the administration, reporting, and analysis of
integrated EIP data. NYEIS will provide near-real-time interfaces to other
systems/agencies and external providers (such as Medicaid), which will
maximize reimbursement from Medicaid and third party insurances,
thereby reducing the costs for the EIP to the State and localities.
• The Department continues to maintain the existing distributed data
system, KIDS, which captures information about children participating in
the EI program on the local level, and which assists municipalities in
claiming reimbursement for EI services from insurance, Medicaid, and the
State. These efforts include release of updated versions of KIDS to
implement technical improvements and correct identified problems, and
providing technical assistance and support to municipalities on the day-today operation of KIDS.
• The Department and State Education Department continue to provide
ongoing training and technical assistance to municipalities, EIP providers,
school district personnel, and parents to provide direction necessary to
ensure that children potentially in need of Preschool Special Education
receive an evaluation from their school districts by age three; and to
ensure the smooth and timely transition of all children from the EIP to
other services and supports, as needed.
• The Department continues to provide ongoing training and technical
assistance to municipalities, EIP providers, and parents to improve
evaluation procedures used to determine eligibility for children referred to
the EIP.
• Training contracts have been established to deliver ongoing statewide
training for providers, municipalities, and parents on a variety of topics
related to the EIP, and to develop new and revised curricula for the EIP.
• The Department holds an annual meeting with Early Intervention Officials/
Managers to disseminate information and discuss policy changes with
municipal officials responsible for local implementation of the EIP. It also
provides the municipalities with an opportunity to network and problemsolve with each other.
• The Department holds bimonthly conference calls with Early Intervention
Officials/Managers to provide training, technical assistance, program
updates and guidance.
Page 6 of 6
Table 1 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Enrolled in the Early Intervention Program By Age. (Children with an IFSP at Any Time During the Period)
January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006 Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
All Children
Enrolled (1)
497
63
522
176
230
258
184
97
368
144
120
102
1,058
2,386
90
104
88
213
149
2
86
163
59
145
110
1,833
99
4,126
626
503
1,182
167
1,345
117
355
90
190
483
2,159
161
484
302
67
41
70
223
3,294
249
133
295
437
218
152
285
3,456
103
42
34,425
30,701
65,126
Birth -< 1 Year Old
Number
Percent (3)
66
13.3%
5
7.9%
114
21.8%
26
14.8%
33
14.3%
45
17.4%
33
17.9%
15
15.5%
52
14.1%
18
12.5%
8
6.7%
14
13.7%
100
9.5%
217
9.1%
13
14.4%
13
12.5%
5
5.7%
34
16.0%
25
16.8%
0
0.0%
8
9.3%
26
16.0%
16
27.1%
18
12.4%
16
14.5%
226
12.3%
14
14.1%
426
10.3%
63
10.1%
56
11.1%
144
12.2%
28
16.8%
172
12.8%
16
13.7%
40
11.3%
7
7.8%
36
18.9%
67
13.9%
350
16.2%
23
14.3%
49
10.1%
43
14.2%
9
13.4%
6
14.6%
8
11.4%
39
17.5%
355
10.8%
44
17.7%
29
21.8%
48
16.3%
69
15.8%
19
8.7%
16
10.5%
29
10.2%
450
13.0%
13
12.6%
5
11.9%
4,525
13.1%
3,819
12.4%
8,344
12.8%
Age Group (2)
1 -< 2 Years Old
Number
Percent (3)
114
22.9%
23
36.5%
175
33.5%
55
31.3%
64
27.8%
76
29.5%
55
29.9%
29
29.9%
111
30.2%
53
36.8%
42
35.0%
25
24.5%
317
30.0%
676
28.3%
36
40.0%
27
26.0%
30
34.1%
61
28.6%
48
32.2%
1
50.0%
31
36.0%
53
32.5%
19
32.2%
49
33.8%
28
25.5%
548
29.9%
28
28.3%
1,242
30.1%
171
27.3%
129
25.6%
335
28.3%
44
26.3%
456
33.9%
30
25.6%
108
30.4%
36
40.0%
59
31.1%
131
27.1%
678
31.4%
40
24.8%
127
26.2%
93
30.8%
20
29.9%
10
24.4%
24
34.3%
64
28.7%
934
28.4%
74
29.7%
48
36.1%
84
28.5%
134
30.7%
82
37.6%
45
29.6%
75
26.3%
1,052
30.4%
33
32.0%
7
16.7%
10,157
29.5%
9,139
29.8%
19,296
29.6%
2 -< 3 Years Old
Number
Percent (3)
300
60.4%
32
50.8%
209
40.0%
85
48.3%
122
53.0%
135
52.3%
88
47.8%
51
52.6%
182
49.5%
65
45.1%
60
50.0%
48
47.1%
595
56.2%
1,392
58.3%
40
44.4%
62
59.6%
50
56.8%
100
46.9%
66
44.3%
0
0.0%
44
51.2%
78
47.9%
24
40.7%
61
42.1%
59
53.6%
919
50.1%
56
56.6%
2,236
54.2%
348
55.6%
288
57.3%
639
54.1%
82
49.1%
714
53.1%
68
58.1%
194
54.6%
43
47.8%
92
48.4%
263
54.5%
1,076
49.8%
90
55.9%
278
57.4%
157
52.0%
37
55.2%
25
61.0%
37
52.9%
102
45.7%
1,959
59.5%
127
51.0%
48
36.1%
143
48.5%
218
49.9%
113
51.8%
75
49.3%
169
59.3%
1,809
52.3%
51
49.5%
26
61.9%
17,746
51.5%
16,430
53.5%
34,176
52.5%
3+ Years Old
Number
Percent (3)
17
3.4%
3
4.8%
24
4.6%
10
5.7%
11
4.8%
2
0.8%
8
4.3%
2
2.1%
23
6.3%
8
5.6%
10
8.3%
15
14.7%
46
4.3%
101
4.2%
1
1.1%
2
1.9%
3
3.4%
18
8.5%
10
6.7%
1
50.0%
3
3.5%
6
3.7%
0
0.0%
17
11.7%
7
6.4%
140
7.6%
1
1.0%
222
5.4%
44
7.0%
30
6.0%
64
5.4%
13
7.8%
3
0.2%
3
2.6%
13
3.7%
4
4.4%
3
1.6%
22
4.6%
55
2.5%
8
5.0%
30
6.2%
9
3.0%
1
1.5%
0
0.0%
1
1.4%
18
8.1%
46
1.4%
4
1.6%
8
6.0%
20
6.8%
16
3.7%
4
1.8%
16
10.5%
12
4.2%
145
4.2%
6
5.8%
4
9.5%
1,997
5.8%
1,313
4.3%
3,310
5.1%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 12/06
(1) Enrolled in EI - Children were counted as enrolled if they had an IFSP at any time during the year, regardless of the length of time in the EIP. The "All Children Enrolled" total in
this table is greater than the sum of "Single Service Children" (Tables 2 & 5) and "Multiple Service Children" (Tables 3 & 6) because some children with IFSPs may only be
authorized for services which were excluded in those tables, like service coordination or evaluations.
(2) Age - Children with an IFSP continuing in the program were assigned to an age category based on their age on January 1, and children entering the program were assigned to an
age category based on the date of the initial IFSP.
(3) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 2 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive A Single Early Intervention Service By Type of Service.
January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006
Service Type (1, 2)
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Single
Service
Children
182
32
218
102
98
147
88
39
168
55
49
38
470
1,213
47
47
25
53
53
0
26
68
23
50
54
809
35
1,577
276
175
411
63
509
58
125
31
83
162
600
49
194
121
25
25
28
72
1,079
89
66
101
162
128
70
130
1,382
55
19
8,107
12,054
20,161
Fam
AT
AudioCnsl/
logy
Sup (3)
Service
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
3.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.1%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Nutrition
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
OT
2.2%
3.1%
6.9%
1.0%
0.0%
3.4%
3.4%
15.4%
1.2%
3.6%
2.0%
5.3%
1.5%
2.1%
2.1%
4.3%
8.0%
15.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
1.5%
4.3%
6.0%
3.7%
1.9%
14.3%
1.3%
0.7%
5.7%
2.7%
3.2%
1.6%
10.3%
2.4%
6.5%
6.0%
1.2%
3.5%
2.0%
2.6%
5.0%
8.0%
8.0%
0.0%
4.2%
0.6%
1.1%
4.5%
2.0%
1.9%
2.3%
1.4%
3.8%
2.5%
3.6%
10.5%
4.3%
2.4%
3.2%
PT
29.7%
40.6%
27.1%
27.5%
23.5%
24.5%
30.7%
15.4%
17.3%
21.8%
8.2%
2.6%
9.4%
15.3%
21.3%
8.5%
24.0%
24.5%
17.0%
0.0%
11.5%
16.2%
17.4%
24.0%
24.1%
16.3%
17.1%
29.9%
15.6%
20.0%
19.0%
23.8%
24.0%
6.9%
10.4%
22.6%
39.8%
22.2%
31.0%
12.2%
16.5%
18.2%
32.0%
20.0%
17.9%
18.1%
32.5%
36.0%
36.4%
25.7%
22.2%
11.7%
17.1%
13.1%
31.5%
16.4%
21.1%
24.1%
23.6%
23.8%
Psych
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Social
Wk
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
5.9%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
Spec Inst
4.9%
21.9%
0.0%
0.0%
10.2%
3.4%
5.7%
2.6%
1.8%
1.8%
8.2%
44.7%
3.6%
2.1%
0.0%
17.0%
4.0%
13.2%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
13.0%
14.0%
7.4%
1.4%
5.7%
3.6%
0.4%
12.6%
6.8%
3.2%
4.3%
15.5%
48.0%
22.6%
7.2%
0.6%
6.2%
30.6%
3.6%
9.9%
4.0%
4.0%
10.7%
6.9%
4.9%
0.0%
4.5%
2.0%
4.9%
1.6%
1.4%
3.8%
13.7%
3.6%
0.0%
25.1%
5.9%
13.6%
Speech
62.6%
34.4%
65.1%
70.6%
66.3%
68.7%
60.2%
64.1%
79.8%
72.7%
81.6%
47.4%
83.4%
80.1%
76.6%
70.2%
64.0%
47.2%
77.4%
0.0%
84.6%
76.5%
65.2%
56.0%
64.8%
79.4%
62.9%
64.1%
83.3%
61.1%
71.3%
68.3%
70.1%
67.2%
39.2%
48.4%
47.0%
75.3%
59.2%
53.1%
75.8%
65.3%
56.0%
68.0%
71.4%
70.8%
57.9%
59.6%
54.5%
64.4%
66.7%
84.4%
80.0%
78.5%
51.9%
76.4%
68.4%
45.4%
67.1%
58.4%
Vision
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 12/06
(1) These data exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in this table and "Multiple Service Children" in Table 3 will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services like service coordination or evaluations.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
(3) Fam Cnsl/Sup. - Family Counseling, Family Support Group and Family Training were combined into one category for this report.
Table 3 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive Multiple Early Intervention Services By Type of Service.
January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006
Service Type (1, 2)
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Mult.
Service
AT
Children Service
294 0.7%
28 0.0%
279 0.0%
73 4.1%
82 0.0%
108 0.0%
91 0.0%
58 0.0%
189 0.0%
87 1.1%
70 0.0%
54 0.0%
578 0.5%
1,096 2.8%
42 0.0%
57 0.0%
61 0.0%
158 14.6%
96 0.0%
0 0.0%
59 1.7%
85 0.0%
36 0.0%
85 4.7%
55 0.0%
1,001 0.4%
62 0.0%
2,456 1.6%
323 6.2%
327 0.0%
743 0.1%
103 0.0%
820 2.4%
57 3.5%
221 0.0%
59 0.0%
103 29.1%
312 1.3%
1,537 0.3%
108 0.0%
279 0.0%
174 0.6%
40 0.0%
16 0.0%
41 0.0%
142 3.5%
2,110 2.2%
153 4.6%
64 0.0%
188 0.0%
272 0.7%
89 0.0%
76 0.0%
151 2.0%
1,942 9.6%
46 4.3%
23 4.3%
24,807 0.4%
17,859 2.5%
42,666 1.3%
Audiology
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
1.0%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
3.6%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.6%
3.1%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
4.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.7%
0.0%
1.1%
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.4%
Fam
Cnsl/
Sup (3)
9.5%
17.9%
22.9%
19.2%
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%
1.7%
5.3%
28.7%
4.3%
5.6%
33.2%
12.9%
9.5%
0.0%
1.6%
9.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
17.6%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
14.1%
0.0%
30.3%
42.7%
3.1%
23.0%
3.9%
28.3%
35.1%
2.3%
6.8%
21.4%
5.1%
21.0%
1.9%
7.5%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
23.9%
43.6%
1.3%
17.2%
17.6%
14.3%
2.2%
0.0%
6.0%
24.9%
28.3%
0.0%
44.9%
22.0%
35.3%
Nursing
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.2%
0.9%
0.0%
9.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.1%
Nutrition
7.1%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
4.6%
1.4%
7.4%
19.2%
0.2%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
13.3%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
10.3%
3.2%
7.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
2.9%
0.6%
10.5%
0.0%
1.7%
1.9%
0.0%
3.4%
4.6%
12.9%
5.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
8.5%
3.4%
0.0%
4.0%
1.5%
2.2%
0.0%
2.1%
4.3%
3.0%
OT
54.4%
53.6%
66.7%
46.6%
45.1%
55.6%
64.8%
69.0%
58.7%
39.1%
51.4%
53.7%
51.7%
58.1%
54.8%
40.4%
50.8%
56.3%
62.5%
0.0%
64.4%
55.3%
66.7%
48.2%
47.3%
51.8%
74.2%
45.2%
48.0%
42.8%
58.3%
43.7%
48.5%
40.4%
42.1%
20.3%
64.1%
40.4%
51.5%
35.2%
41.9%
45.4%
57.5%
56.3%
26.8%
70.4%
30.0%
47.7%
64.1%
55.9%
51.1%
62.9%
64.5%
57.6%
57.9%
50.0%
60.9%
54.1%
49.4%
52.1%
PT
46.3%
67.9%
61.6%
52.1%
53.7%
49.1%
63.7%
55.2%
40.7%
41.4%
48.6%
46.3%
34.8%
53.9%
45.2%
47.4%
42.6%
47.5%
52.1%
0.0%
61.0%
54.1%
80.6%
42.4%
52.7%
44.7%
48.4%
42.4%
39.3%
43.4%
46.8%
55.3%
44.5%
42.1%
47.5%
59.3%
54.4%
47.4%
47.9%
40.7%
44.4%
48.3%
55.0%
50.0%
56.1%
51.4%
38.6%
54.9%
65.6%
52.1%
45.6%
50.6%
46.1%
52.3%
53.9%
52.2%
47.8%
50.8%
46.7%
49.1%
Psych
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
1.2%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2.5%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
6.0%
0.0%
1.8%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.8%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.7%
0.0%
1.1%
1.7%
0.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
11.8%
3.1%
9.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
0.9%
0.0%
8.7%
0.4%
1.4%
0.8%
Social
Wk
17.7%
0.0%
16.5%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
17.2%
2.9%
13.0%
10.0%
4.5%
2.4%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
3.6%
27.9%
1.6%
6.4%
0.6%
7.3%
10.8%
15.5%
17.6%
1.8%
0.5%
5.1%
26.2%
32.1%
1.6%
3.7%
26.2%
14.4%
27.5%
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
6.7%
19.0%
3.1%
24.5%
27.2%
0.0%
19.7%
4.0%
2.1%
13.0%
0.0%
13.0%
9.0%
11.3%
Spec
Inst
73.1%
57.1%
34.4%
54.8%
72.0%
46.3%
46.2%
51.7%
68.3%
51.7%
71.4%
70.4%
57.3%
60.0%
64.3%
68.4%
80.3%
84.2%
60.4%
0.0%
66.1%
65.9%
63.9%
77.6%
83.6%
64.3%
80.6%
75.2%
61.9%
66.1%
72.9%
74.8%
66.7%
77.2%
95.0%
79.7%
67.0%
78.2%
77.6%
87.0%
83.2%
83.9%
65.0%
56.3%
82.9%
62.0%
79.7%
61.4%
29.7%
67.6%
68.8%
58.4%
50.0%
74.2%
66.9%
47.8%
56.5%
64.8%
70.2%
67.1%
Speech
89.8%
82.1%
84.6%
87.7%
85.4%
83.3%
84.6%
91.4%
91.0%
89.7%
82.9%
61.1%
89.4%
80.1%
95.2%
87.7%
80.3%
80.4%
84.4%
0.0%
89.8%
88.2%
86.1%
78.8%
90.9%
87.5%
85.5%
90.2%
88.5%
88.7%
82.9%
71.8%
90.5%
75.4%
76.0%
81.4%
77.7%
91.0%
84.7%
82.4%
85.7%
87.9%
87.5%
81.3%
75.6%
84.5%
85.4%
89.5%
89.1%
86.7%
86.8%
92.1%
85.5%
85.4%
80.1%
80.4%
78.3%
76.8%
85.5%
80.4%
Vision
3.1%
7.1%
2.5%
1.4%
8.5%
9.3%
0.0%
10.3%
2.6%
3.4%
4.3%
7.4%
0.2%
3.9%
4.8%
1.8%
4.9%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
8.3%
3.5%
7.3%
4.8%
1.6%
1.1%
1.9%
4.0%
3.2%
1.9%
2.0%
0.0%
0.5%
6.8%
1.0%
7.4%
2.5%
4.6%
3.2%
5.2%
7.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2.9%
4.6%
6.3%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
5.3%
5.3%
1.3%
4.3%
4.3%
1.3%
2.7%
1.9%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 12/06
(1) These data exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in Table 2 and "Multiple Service
Children" in this table will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services like service coordination or
evaluations in this time period.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
(3) Fam Cnsl/Sup. - Family Counseling, Family Support Group and Family Training services were combined into one category for this report.
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Physical
Therapy
Assistants
Physical
Therapists
Pediatricians,
Other Physicians
and Physician
Assistants
Orientation and
Mobility
Specialists
Occupational
Therapists
Licensed Practical
Nurses,
Registered
Nurses and Nurse
Practitioners
Certified
Occupational
Therapy
Assistants
Certified Low
Vision
Specialists
Audiologists
Municipality
Table 4 - Number of NYS Approved Agency and Individual Providers Under Contract with Municipalities to Provide EI Services by Service Specialty (1,2) Expressed as FTEs by Type of Discipline (3) As of December 31, 2006
Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind.
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.6 0.0
6.0 0.0
32.4 10.1
0.2 0.0
4.3 0.0
38.5 6.3
0.3 0.0
1.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.1 0.0
2.4 0.0
9.3
1.3
0.3 0.0
1.9 0.0
9.2 2.3
0.5 0.0
0.9 0.5
0.0 0.0
3.5 0.0
8.9 0.0
6.1
2.2
2.0 0.0
3.8 0.0
12.2 1.4
3.2 0.0
4.1 0.5
0.0 0.0
8.6 0.0
1.9 0.0
16.4
1.0
0.3 0.0
2.3 0.0
22.7 3.3
3.5 0.0
5.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.3 0.0
2.4 0.0
17.5
2.0
0.6 0.0
0.9 0.0
16.6 2.4
7.6 0.0
4.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
7.1 0.0
13.8
1.5
0.0 0.0
2.8 0.0
12.5 5.2
0.0 0.0
1.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
3.2 0.0
11.2
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.5 0.0
11.9 2.0
1.0 0.0
0.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.7 0.1
0.8 0.0
4.2
4.4
0.0 0.0
2.0 0.0
10.6 1.9
2.3 0.0
1.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
6.5 0.0
2.9
0.0
0.0 0.0
2.3 0.0
3.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.3 0.0
5.5 0.0
23.5
2.2
0.2 0.3
4.0 0.0
27.5 1.4
0.3 0.0
2.6 1.0
0.0 0.0
1.2 0.0
5.4 0.0
4.0
0.0
2.5 0.0
2.8 0.0
5.8 0.0
2.0 0.0
5.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.5 0.0
18.9 0.0
11.7
2.4
2.0 0.0
12.6 0.0
21.3 0.6
8.9 0.0
1.6 0.0
0.3 0.0
3.4 0.0
7.2 0.0
21.6
0.5
0.0 0.0
4.6 0.0
22.4 0.0
1.3 0.0
7.5 0.0
0.3 0.0
8.3 0.0
11.5 0.0
61.9
0.0
0.3 0.0
5.8 0.0
67.2 0.0
4.3 0.0
0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0
4.3 0.0
3.8
0.2
0.1 0.0
2.3 0.0
4.3 1.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0
17.4 0.0
7.9
0.0
0.0 0.0
4.3 0.0
5.0 0.0
1.5 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
1.1 0.0
17.1 0.0
9.2
0.8
2.7 0.0
2.9 0.0
8.7 0.7
0.6 0.0
3.0 0.2
0.0 0.0
3.9 0.0
3.6 0.0
17.4
0.8
0.3 0.0
0.3 0.0
25.5 1.0
1.7 0.0
3.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.8 0.0
9.1 0.0
14.9
3.5
0.2 0.0
3.2 0.0
15.9 2.3
1.2 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.7 0.0
0.4
0.0
0.1 0.0
0.4 0.0
3.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
11.2 0.0
21.0 0.0
38.8
2.3
2.5 0.0
5.5 1.0
35.8 1.5
8.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.0 0.0
1.2 0.0
10.5
1.1
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
10.6 0.0
3.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
2.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
8.0 0.0
2.2 0.0
32.6
1.4
2.6 0.0
2.4 0.0
26.9 1.0
4.5 0.0
1.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
26.3
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.5 0.0
16.7 0.3
0.0 0.0
5.5 0.0
0.2 0.0
9.5 0.0
2.3 0.0
32.8
0.0
2.5 0.0
1.4 0.0
32.1 0.0
6.0 0.0
4.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.8 0.0
0.5 0.0
38.1
4.4
2.0 0.1
3.1 0.0
25.9 2.2
0.7 0.0
4.6 0.0
0.2 0.0
8.8 0.0
66.6 0.0
30.8
2.1
2.7 0.0
10.4 0.0
35.8 1.8
14.5 0.0
32.4 0.0
1.9 0.5
40.0 0.0
15.2 0.0
461.9
3.8
0.8 0.0
25.6 0.0
466.7 5.5
16.0 0.0
0.3 0.0
49.1 0.0
10.6 0.0
76.1
1.7
0.3 0.0
2.2 0.0
63.1 1.8
5.0 0.0
8.1 0.0
2.3 0.0
0.2 0.0
10.2 0.0
8.9 0.0
34.2
0.0
2.5 0.0
1.4 0.0
30.8 0.0
6.0 0.0
9.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1 0.0
4.0 0.0
36.8
3.4
0.6 0.0
6.3 1.0
34.7 2.4
1.1 0.0
3.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.0
1.4 0.0
21.5
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
10.8 0.5
0.1 0.0
5.6 0.0
6.3 0.0
12.6 0.0
12.3 0.0
99.3
4.0
1.0 0.2
8.2 0.0
115.1 2.2
0.4 0.0
0.5 0.0
0.3 0.0
0.9 0.0
0.2 0.0
10.1
0.0
0.3 0.0
1.1 0.0
4.7 0.0
1.7 0.0
7.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.0 0.0
0.5 0.0
29.5
0.0
0.5 0.0
2.5 1.0
24.2 0.0
7.5 0.0
13.0 0.0
10.6 0.0
20.5
1.0
2.0 0.0
8.4 0.0
19.2 1.4
6.5 0.0
3.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1 0.5
0.0 0.0
8.0 0.0
8.7 0.0
87.3
1.5
0.0 0.0
5.2 0.0
96.7 0.5
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.3 0.0
5.8 0.0
30.7
6.4
0.2 0.0
4.8 0.0
42.6 5.2
2.9 0.0
8.0 0.0
1.3 0.0
12.6 0.0
17.9 0.0
132.0
6.6
3.0 0.0
9.9 0.0
136.1 6.5
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.2 0.0
1.6 0.0
9.9
0.0
0.1 0.0
0.9 0.0
12.4 0.0
2.0 0.0
6.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
19.8 0.0
66.8 0.0
50.2 10.3
0.3 0.0
14.5 0.0
70.3 7.5
16.3 0.0
4.6 0.0
0.0 0.1
11.8 0.0
66.3 0.0
42.1
1.8
0.2 0.0
12.9 0.0
52.7 1.5
14.5 0.0
10.0 0.0
15.7 0.0
36.6
1.8
0.2 0.0
4.0 0.0
31.9 1.0
0.3 0.0
0.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.4 0.0
2.8 0.0
10.8
1.3
0.0 0.0
2.4 0.0
11.3 0.0
1.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.0
1.6 1.0
4.9
0.3
0.1 0.0
1.4 0.0
5.6 0.1
0.1 0.0
3.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
8.5 0.0
15.0
3.9
2.0 0.0
2.8 0.0
15.2 4.3
1.0 0.0
36.7 0.0
1.5 2.6
33.4 0.0
387.6 0.0
464.8
9.1
2.7 0.0
92.3 0.0
454.1 15.1
9.8 0.0
3.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.9 0.0
13.8 0.0
42.3
3.4
0.0 0.0
5.9 0.0
44.1 1.5
2.0 0.0
0.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.7 0.0
7.8 0.0
10.5
1.2
2.0 0.0
0.8 0.0
15.3 1.2
2.8 0.0
3.1 0.0
6.3
0.5
0.5 0.0
1.8 0.0
5.3 0.9
0.5 0.0
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.2 0.0
0.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
7.9 0.0
5.9 0.0
16.4
7.6
0.0 0.3
4.9 0.0
19.0 2.6
1.9 0.0
1.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0
5.7 0.0
1.5
0.0
0.1 0.0
2.6 0.0
2.5 0.0
0.5 0.0
1.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.1 0.0
4.7 0.0
18.6
3.5
0.1 0.0
2.6 0.0
21.5 2.6
0.6 0.0
3.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.0
2.1 0.0
25.7
2.3
0.1 0.0
3.1 0.0
21.6 0.8
0.1 0.0
16.0 0.5
0.2 0.0
19.7 0.0
38.8 0.0
245.4
4.1
5.2 0.0
27.9 0.0
232.8 8.6
1.0 0.0
0.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1 0.0
0.6 0.0
7.0
0.0
0.3 0.0
0.5 0.0
6.2 0.0
2.5 0.0
8.6 0.0
8.1
2.3
0.0 0.0
2.7 0.0
8.1 1.2
0.5 0.0
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
39.9 0.0
2.5 0.0
69.9 0.0
68.3 0.0
721.8
0.0
5.7 0.0
56.8 0.0
712.5 0.0
16.5 0.0
123.5 3.2
8.6 3.2
182.7 0.1
654.5 1.0 1,086.5 102.0
18.2 0.5
193.8 1.0 1,113.2 94.8
89.7 0.0
151.0 3.2
10.9 3.2
234.3 0.1
705.0 1.0 1,468.0 102.0
18.2 0.5
232.8 1.0 1,489.1 94.8
105.5 0.0
Data Source: NYS EI Provider Approval database 1/26/07
(1) Providers with contracts in more than one county are counted more than once.
(2) Providers with qualified personnel in more than one area of licensure, certification or registration are counted more than once.
(3) Full time equivalents and types of qualified personnel were take from provider applications for state approval.
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind.
13.1 0.0
0.1 0.0
4.9 3.1
36.9
7.4
2.7 0.2
1.0 0.0
1.7 0.0
7.9
2.9
2.7 0.0
3.6 0.0
6.5 0.0
14.2
1.6
2.1 0.0
7.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
25.0
3.3
3.1 0.0
0.7 1.0
4.8 0.0
20.3
2.8
4.4 0.0
1.1 0.0
3.3 0.3
18.2
2.0
4.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.2 0.0
9.3
4.2
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
5.6 0.0
9.9
1.4
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
8.0
0.0
4.9 0.0
2.1 0.0
4.7 1.8
27.2
4.1
2.9 0.0
1.1 0.5
3.5 0.0
17.0
0.0
5.9 0.0
6.3 0.1
8.4 0.6
17.2
1.0
5.2 0.0
2.5 0.0
22.6 0.0
44.5
0.0
13.6 0.0
3.8 0.0
14.5 0.0
67.1
0.0
0.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3
13.5
0.0
1.1 0.0
1.1 0.1
0.2 0.0
9.0
0.0
2.6 0.0
0.5 0.0
6.3 0.0
17.1
3.0
1.1 0.2
1.5 0.5
3.3 0.3
10.0
1.9
6.2 0.0
0.4 0.3
7.5 1.2
36.1
4.8
0.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5.5
0.0
10.8 0.0
4.0 0.0
12.2 0.0
40.8
0.9
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.6 0.0
7.3
0.0
9.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
11.4 0.0
39.2
1.0
9.3 0.0
1.0 0.0
6.4 0.5
39.7
1.0
9.1 0.0
1.0 0.0
15.3 0.0
49.7
0.0
10.7 1.2
2.5 0.5
11.4 2.1
65.3
4.6
9.7 0.0
0.9 0.0
13.3 0.0
17.5
5.0
80.5 0.0
16.9 0.0
234.2 0.5 1,046.4
3.4
13.4 0.0
0.8 0.0
14.0 0.0
73.6
2.1
7.9 0.0
1.0 0.0
10.3 0.0
40.3
0.0
9.3 0.0
2.1 0.0
8.0 4.3
65.8
2.8
5.9 0.0
2.1 0.0
4.6 1.0
22.2
0.0
11.1 0.0
2.2 0.5
55.6 1.0
298.4
4.4
1.7 0.0
1.0 0.5
4.0 0.0
11.0
0.0
5.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.8 0.0
34.6
0.5
8.8 0.0
2.0 0.0
14.6 0.5
26.8
3.1
13.9 0.0
3.1 0.0
44.6 0.8
245.5
2.0
12.0 0.0
0.1 0.0
4.1 2.4
40.0
3.9
16.7 0.4
6.7 0.0
60.3 0.3
303.6
8.2
15.2
0.0
2.4 0.0
0.2 0.0
1.8 0.0
18.9 0.0
1.4 0.5
15.9 3.5
41.5 13.7
18.5 0.2
2.7 0.0
17.9 0.0
33.4
3.6
8.6 0.0
0.4 0.0
8.5 1.5
43.0
1.3
3.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.4 0.0
9.8
2.0
2.6 0.0
0.7 0.0
3.7 0.0
16.1
1.3
4.8 0.0
0.1 0.0
5.7 0.3
10.8
5.1
128.1 0.0
39.1 1.0
324.5 2.5 1,065.2 15.8
9.7 0.0
3.0 0.0
13.4 1.0
36.7
4.0
4.2 0.0
0.1 0.0
8.6 0.2
18.9
2.0
2.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
5.0 0.9
11.5
1.8
5.9 0.0
2.1 0.5
17.3 3.5
43.2
2.9
0.5 0.0
0.7 0.0
0.5 0.0
3.6
0.0
5.1 0.0
0.5 0.0
1.3 0.5
24.0
1.9
7.2 0.0
2.2 0.0
7.0 0.0
33.9
0.9
49.7 2.0
8.3 0.0
202.9 2.6
512.3
4.0
0.9 0.0
0.0 0.5
0.0 0.3
7.4
0.0
2.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
3.3 0.0
9.7
0.0
124.3 0.0
19.3 0.0
392.1 0.0 1,247.1
0.0
267.6 4.0
90.8 5.0
610.0 29.7 1,857.7 114.6
347.2 4.0
103.3 5.0
794.0 29.7 2,443.7 114.6
Teachers of the
Speech and
Hearing
Handicapped
Teachers of the
Deaf and Hearing
Handicapped
Teachers of the
Blind and
Partially Sighted
Speech and
Language
Pathologists and
Audiologists
Special
Education
Teachers
Social Workers
Registered
Dieticians
Psychologists
Municipality
Table 4 - Number of NYS Approved Agency and Individual Providers Under Contract with Municipalities to Provide EI Services by Service Specialty (1,2) Expressed as FTEs by Type of Discipline (3) As of December 31, 2006
Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind.
54.2 25.7
0.5 1.4
5.2 0.0
19.2 4.1
10.6
2.8
0.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.5 0.3
14.7 14.1
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.9 4.1
33.8
6.9
0.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
8.1 1.0
20.0
8.1
0.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
9.9 1.9
17.6
3.7
0.0 0.3
0.5 0.0
9.1 0.5
23.8
6.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
1.0 2.3
0.2 1.4
9.3
4.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.5
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
43.2
6.5
2.0 0.5
0.4 0.0
12.3 0.5
9.8
0.9
0.3 0.0
4.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
15.3
3.2
0.8 0.0
0.5 0.1
4.2 0.8
59.0
0.0
0.8 0.0
0.4 0.0
6.0 0.0
129.7
0.0
1.5 0.0
1.1 0.0
15.5 0.0
9.8
4.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 1.0
1.0 0.0
8.3 0.0
7.2
0.0
1.0 0.0
10.5
3.3
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.5
33.1
1.4
1.2 0.0
0.9 0.3
5.5 0.5
36.9
5.8
1.0 0.4
0.3 0.0
23.3 1.4
0.9
0.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.3
79.0
2.7
2.1 0.0
2.0 0.0
21.5 0.7
14.9
0.5
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.0 0.0
72.1
0.8
2.2 0.0
0.2 0.0
8.5 0.0
1.5
1.7 0.0
0.0 0.2
4.1 0.5
78.2
78.9
0.0
2.0 0.0
4.0 0.0
16.8 0.0
105.3 14.3
3.7 1.6
0.9 0.0
11.9 1.4
26.8
2.3
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.0 0.1
881.3
8.0
12.2 0.0
8.6 0.3
255.8 1.2
125.7
7.6
1.7 0.1
1.9 0.0
12.4 1.9
73.2
1.0
2.0 0.0
2.0 0.0
9.3 0.0
101.8 10.6
0.9 0.4
4.7 0.0
23.5 3.5
43.1
3.8
1.1 0.5
0.0 0.0
2.4 0.3
174.7
6.7
4.2 0.6
2.2 0.0
109.2 2.9
23.5
2.5
1.2 0.0
0.9 0.0
0.5 0.3
64.7
1.2
0.4 0.0
0.8 0.0
10.8 0.5
22.6
4.9
0.6 0.0
0.8 0.0
9.6 1.6
117.3
8.0
2.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
76.7 1.1
48.2 15.0
1.0 1.2
4.3 0.0
20.6 2.4
191.2 13.0
7.2 0.5
1.8 0.5
114.3 1.9
17.4
0.0
0.2 0.0
0.2 0.0
1.2 0.0
64.9 29.2
0.3 0.0
5.2 0.0
25.8 3.5
54.4 10.5
0.3 0.0
4.0 0.0
24.2 2.4
76.0
2.8
0.3 0.0
0.3 0.0
0.5 0.5
19.6
0.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 1.0
9.5
1.8
0.1 0.5
0.0 0.0
1.4 0.5
28.0
8.8
1.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
2.5 1.9
967.9 54.8
41.6 1.8
8.9 0.3
314.1 17.2
62.1
2.9
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.0
4.9 0.0
24.1
5.1
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.8 3.6
7.5
9.2
0.3 0.0
4.0 0.3
1.1 1.9
45.9 10.8
2.0 0.7
0.2 0.0
21.2 1.4
2.2
1.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
36.4 11.0
0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.9 0.8
52.1
5.9
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.5 0.0
378.3 14.2
8.8 0.5
0.8 0.1
146.5 3.5
8.2
1.6
0.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.6
12.3
4.8
0.0 0.5
0.0 0.1
1.0 0.7
1,120.9
0.0
15.6 0.0
8.8 0.0
338.4 0.0
2,006.4 319.6
69.9 8.4
29.7 2.1
567.0 67.7
2,550.9 319.6
74.3 8.4
37.0 2.1
699.2 67.7
Data Source: NYS EI Provider Approval database 1/26/07
(1) Providers with contracts in more than one county are counted more than once.
(2) Providers with qualified personnel in more than one area of licensure, certification or registration are counted more than o
(3) Full time equivalents and types of qualified personnel were take from provider applications for state approval.
Table 5 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive A Single Service (1) By Type of Provider. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Single Service
Children
182
32
218
102
98
147
88
39
168
55
49
38
470
1,213
47
47
25
53
53
0
26
68
23
50
54
809
35
1,577
276
175
411
63
509
58
125
31
83
162
600
49
194
121
25
25
28
72
1,079
89
66
101
162
128
70
130
1,382
55
19
8,107
12,054
20,161
Agency
Number
58
20
110
25
41
91
60
5
132
21
49
13
464
1,213
27
47
8
47
18
0
21
68
10
30
52
675
18
1,490
188
174
411
54
380
47
118
2
66
90
527
49
74
42
9
24
17
43
983
49
38
40
116
128
14
79
1,297
46
4
8,107
9,922
18,029
Individual
Percent (2)
31.9%
62.5%
50.5%
24.5%
41.8%
61.9%
68.2%
12.8%
78.6%
38.2%
100.0%
34.2%
98.7%
100.0%
57.4%
100.0%
32.0%
88.7%
34.0%
na
80.8%
100.0%
43.5%
60.0%
96.3%
83.4%
51.4%
94.5%
68.1%
99.4%
100.0%
85.7%
74.7%
81.0%
94.4%
6.5%
79.5%
55.6%
87.8%
100.0%
38.1%
34.7%
36.0%
96.0%
60.7%
59.7%
91.1%
55.1%
57.6%
39.6%
71.6%
100.0%
20.0%
60.8%
93.8%
83.6%
21.1%
100.0%
82.3%
89.4%
Number
124
12
108
77
57
56
28
34
36
34
0
25
6
0
20
0
17
6
35
0
5
0
13
20
2
134
17
87
88
1
0
9
129
11
7
29
17
72
73
0
120
79
16
1
11
29
96
40
28
61
46
0
56
51
85
9
15
0
2132
2132
Percent (2)
68.1%
37.5%
49.5%
75.5%
58.2%
38.1%
31.8%
87.2%
21.4%
61.8%
0.0%
65.8%
1.3%
0.0%
42.6%
0.0%
68.0%
11.3%
66.0%
na
19.2%
0.0%
56.5%
40.0%
3.7%
16.6%
48.6%
5.5%
31.9%
0.6%
0.0%
14.3%
25.3%
19.0%
5.6%
93.5%
20.5%
44.4%
12.2%
0.0%
61.9%
65.3%
64.0%
4.0%
39.3%
40.3%
8.9%
44.9%
42.4%
60.4%
28.4%
0.0%
80.0%
39.2%
6.2%
16.4%
78.9%
0.0%
17.7%
10.6%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 12/06, NYS EI Provider Approval database as of 2/7/2007
(1) Single Service Children - A child was counted as a 'single service child' if only one type of service was authorized in the reporting period. These data
exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in this table and "Multiple
Service Children" in Table 6 will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services
like service coordination or evaluations in this time period.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 6 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive Multiple Services (1) By Type of Provider. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Multi Service
Children
294
28
279
73
82
108
91
58
189
87
70
54
578
1,096
42
57
61
158
96
0
59
85
36
85
55
1,001
62
2,456
323
327
743
103
820
57
221
59
103
312
1,537
108
279
174
40
16
41
142
2,110
153
64
188
272
89
76
151
1,942
46
23
24,807
17,859
42,666
Agency Only
Number
Percent (2)
43
14.6%
7
25.0%
74
26.5%
5
6.8%
3
3.7%
31
28.7%
35
38.5%
0
0.0%
146
77.2%
10
11.5%
68
97.1%
3
5.6%
552
95.5%
1,096
100.0%
10
23.8%
57
100.0%
6
9.8%
121
76.6%
5
5.2%
0
N/A
11
18.6%
83
97.6%
5
13.9%
48
56.5%
48
87.3%
607
60.6%
4
6.5%
2,131
86.8%
212
65.6%
317
96.9%
743
100.0%
72
69.9%
310
37.8%
46
80.7%
204
92.3%
1
1.7%
54
52.4%
127
40.7%
1,201
78.1%
108
100.0%
29
10.4%
72
41.4%
2
5.0%
12
75.0%
33
80.5%
22
15.5%
1,603
76.0%
44
28.8%
15
23.4%
36
19.1%
109
40.1%
65
73.0%
4
5.3%
89
58.9%
1,588
81.8%
32
69.6%
10
43.5%
24,807
100.0%
12,369
69.3%
37,176
87.1%
Individual Only
Number
Percent (2)
113
38.4%
3
10.7%
39
14.0%
30
41.1%
32
39.0%
13
12.0%
3
3.3%
36
62.1%
0
0.0%
33
37.9%
0
0.0%
12
22.2%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
2.4%
0
0.0%
15
24.6%
1
0.6%
32
33.3%
0
N/A
2
3.4%
0
0.0%
7
19.4%
7
8.2%
0
0.0%
40
4.0%
15
24.2%
1
0.0%
4
1.2%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
4
3.9%
41
5.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.5%
37
62.7%
2
1.9%
31
9.9%
69
4.5%
0
0.0%
86
30.8%
21
12.1%
23
57.5%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
23
16.2%
24
1.1%
18
11.8%
4
6.3%
23
12.2%
6
2.2%
0
0.0%
35
46.1%
13
8.6%
6
0.3%
0
0.0%
6
26.1%
0
0.0%
912
5.1%
912
2.1%
Individual & Agency
Number
Percent (2)
138
46.9%
18
64.3%
166
59.5%
38
52.1%
47
57.3%
64
59.3%
53
58.2%
22
37.9%
43
22.8%
44
50.6%
2
2.9%
39
72.2%
26
4.5%
0
0.0%
31
73.8%
0
0.0%
40
65.6%
36
22.8%
59
61.5%
0
N/A
46
78.0%
2
2.4%
24
66.7%
30
35.3%
7
12.7%
354
35.4%
43
69.4%
324
13.2%
107
33.1%
10
3.1%
0
0.0%
27
26.2%
469
57.2%
11
19.3%
16
7.2%
21
35.6%
47
45.6%
154
49.4%
267
17.4%
0
0.0%
164
58.8%
81
46.6%
15
37.5%
4
25.0%
8
19.5%
97
68.3%
483
22.9%
91
59.5%
45
70.3%
129
68.6%
157
57.7%
24
27.0%
37
48.7%
49
32.5%
348
17.9%
14
30.4%
7
30.4%
0
0.0%
4578
25.6%
4578
10.7%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 12/06, NYS EI Provider Approval database as of 2/7/2007
(1) Multiple Service Children - A child was counted as a 'multiple service child' if more than one type of service was authorized in the reporting period. These data
exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in Table 5 and "Multiple Service Children" in
this table will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services like service coordination or
evaluations in this time period.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 7 - Number and Percent of Evaluators Contracted with Municipalities to Provide Evaluations Who also Provided Services to Children Whom They Evaluated. January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Number of
Evaluators (1)
97
23
48
34
37
27
24
21
7
41
10
34
17
24
16
9
20
17
45
3
20
10
18
9
13
66
28
105
15
13
29
20
14
6
16
31
10
79
82
11
122
52
24
7
10
53
245
37
35
23
39
4
35
36
46
7
19
108
1,330
1,415
Evaluators providing services to children whom they
evaluated (2)
Number
Percent
44
45.4%
12
52.2%
24
50.0%
15
44.1%
24
64.9%
15
55.6%
15
62.5%
7
33.3%
4
57.1%
23
56.1%
5
50.0%
12
35.3%
10
58.8%
20
83.3%
7
43.8%
5
55.6%
8
40.0%
8
47.1%
22
48.9%
2
66.7%
9
45.0%
7
70.0%
13
72.2%
7
77.8%
10
76.9%
44
66.7%
12
42.9%
76
72.4%
12
80.0%
9
69.2%
17
58.6%
15
75.0%
11
78.6%
6
100.0%
9
56.3%
9
29.0%
7
70.0%
46
58.2%
45
54.9%
10
90.9%
53
43.4%
26
50.0%
16
66.7%
7
100.0%
9
90.0%
22
41.5%
82
33.5%
15
40.5%
21
60.0%
12
52.2%
25
64.1%
3
75.0%
19
54.3%
25
69.4%
35
76.1%
7
100.0%
10
52.6%
97
89.8%
602
45.3%
676
47.8%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of December 31, 2006, NYS Provider Approval database January 26, 2007
(1) Evaluators are providers approved by NYSDOH and under contract with that municipality to provide evaluation services. A
provider may contract with more than one municipality.
(2) Evaluators who provided general services between 1/1/06 and 12/31/06 to a child from any municipalty whom they had
evaluated at any time.
Table 8 - Number and Percent of Children Whose Families Were Authorized to Receive Supportive Services. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Total
Children (1)
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Number
497
63
522
176
230
258
184
97
368
144
120
102
1,058
2,386
90
104
88
213
149
2
86
163
59
145
110
1,833
99
4,126
626
503
1,182
167
1,345
117
355
90
190
483
2,159
161
484
302
67
41
70
223
3,294
249
133
295
437
218
152
285
3,456
103
42
34,425
30,701
65,126
Received Supportive
Service (2)
Percent
41
14
74
15
13
3
4
2
10
28
5
11
231
166
5
0
1
19
7
0
1
19
7
1
8
283
0
782
150
25
214
42
249
25
33
8
32
34
326
14
39
16
6
0
4
46
962
17
12
36
49
4
12
42
508
15
0
11,232
4,670
15,902
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of December 31, 2006
(1) Total Children - Children were included if they had an IFSP at any time during the period, regardless of the length of time.
(2) Supportive Services - Family Counseling, Family Support Group, Family Training, and Respite services.
8.2%
22.2%
14.2%
8.5%
5.7%
1.2%
2.2%
2.1%
2.7%
19.4%
4.2%
10.8%
21.8%
7.0%
5.6%
0.0%
1.1%
8.9%
4.7%
0.0%
1.2%
11.7%
11.9%
0.7%
7.3%
15.4%
0.0%
19.0%
24.0%
5.0%
18.1%
25.1%
18.5%
21.4%
9.3%
8.9%
16.8%
7.0%
15.1%
8.7%
8.1%
5.3%
9.0%
0.0%
5.7%
20.6%
29.2%
6.8%
9.0%
12.2%
11.2%
1.8%
7.9%
14.7%
14.7%
14.6%
0.0%
32.6%
15.2%
24.4%
Table 9 - Number and Percent Of Children Within Municipalities with Sources of Third Party Reimbursement (Medicaid and Commercial Insurance). January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Enrolled in EI
(1,4)
497
63
522
176
230
258
184
97
368
144
120
102
1,058
2,386
90
104
88
213
149
2
86
163
59
145
110
1,833
99
4,126
626
503
1,182
167
1,345
117
355
90
190
483
2,159
161
484
302
67
41
70
223
3,294
249
133
295
437
218
152
285
3,456
103
42
34,425
30,701
65,126
Medicaid Only (2,4)
Number
182
28
213
44
113
107
105
58
191
60
59
47
173
718
47
55
50
84
71
1
57
56
31
52
41
603
44
612
191
213
345
44
281
45
185
39
14
187
119
95
86
153
26
14
29
121
559
81
49
116
113
62
56
78
804
29
24
18,946
8,060
27,006
Percent
36.6%
44.4%
40.8%
25.0%
49.1%
41.5%
57.1%
59.8%
51.9%
41.7%
49.2%
46.1%
16.4%
30.1%
52.2%
52.9%
56.8%
39.4%
47.7%
50.0%
66.3%
34.4%
52.5%
35.9%
37.3%
32.9%
44.4%
14.8%
30.5%
42.3%
29.2%
26.3%
20.9%
38.5%
52.1%
43.3%
7.4%
38.7%
5.5%
59.0%
17.8%
50.7%
38.8%
34.1%
41.4%
54.3%
17.0%
32.5%
36.8%
39.3%
25.9%
28.4%
36.8%
27.4%
23.3%
28.2%
57.1%
55.0%
26.3%
41.5%
Commercial Insurance Only
(3,4)
Number
Percent
264
53.1%
25
39.7%
217
41.6%
70
39.8%
104
45.2%
67
26.0%
57
31.0%
24
24.7%
157
42.7%
72
50.0%
50
41.7%
37
36.3%
657
62.1%
1,286
53.9%
30
33.3%
39
37.5%
27
30.7%
107
50.2%
69
46.3%
1
50.0%
24
27.9%
86
52.8%
17
28.8%
85
58.6%
55
50.0%
1079
58.9%
31
31.3%
3,354
81.3%
368
58.8%
216
42.9%
596
50.4%
93
55.7%
862
64.1%
42
35.9%
136
38.3%
33
36.7%
166
87.4%
241
49.9%
1,190
55.1%
45
28.0%
311
64.3%
126
41.7%
31
46.3%
12
29.3%
30
42.9%
73
32.7%
2,498
75.8%
104
41.8%
61
45.9%
155
52.5%
228
52.2%
116
53.2%
64
42.1%
149
52.3%
2,467
71.4%
58
56.3%
12
28.6%
6,034
17.5%
18,574
60.5%
24,608
37.8%
Both (4)
Number
21
8
59
54
10
79
18
10
19
9
9
9
58
365
5
9
6
12
3
0
3
13
5
6
13
105
16
146
42
21
167
23
120
30
5
17
8
17
792
16
47
18
7
0
6
21
107
57
18
18
50
24
19
41
172
10
1
981
2,944
3,925
Percent
4.2%
12.7%
11.3%
30.7%
4.3%
30.6%
9.8%
10.3%
5.2%
6.3%
7.5%
8.8%
5.5%
15.3%
5.6%
8.7%
6.8%
5.6%
2.0%
0.0%
3.5%
8.0%
8.5%
4.1%
11.8%
5.7%
16.2%
3.5%
6.7%
4.2%
14.1%
13.8%
8.9%
25.6%
1.4%
18.9%
4.2%
3.5%
36.7%
9.9%
9.7%
6.0%
10.4%
0.0%
8.6%
9.4%
3.2%
22.9%
13.5%
6.1%
11.4%
11.0%
12.5%
14.4%
5.0%
9.7%
2.4%
2.8%
9.6%
6.0%
Unknown (4)
Number
30
2
33
8
3
5
4
5
1
3
2
9
170
17
8
1
5
10
6
0
2
8
6
2
1
46
8
14
25
53
74
7
82
0
29
1
2
38
58
5
40
5
3
15
5
8
130
7
5
6
46
16
13
17
13
6
5
8,464
1,123
9,587
Percent
6.0%
3.2%
6.3%
4.5%
1.3%
1.9%
2.2%
5.2%
0.3%
2.1%
1.7%
8.8%
16.1%
0.7%
8.9%
1.0%
5.7%
4.7%
4.0%
0.0%
2.3%
4.9%
10.2%
1.4%
0.9%
2.5%
8.1%
0.3%
4.0%
10.5%
6.3%
4.2%
6.1%
0.0%
8.2%
1.1%
1.1%
7.9%
2.7%
3.1%
8.3%
1.7%
4.5%
36.6%
7.1%
3.6%
3.9%
2.8%
3.8%
2.0%
10.5%
7.3%
8.6%
6.0%
0.4%
5.8%
11.9%
24.6%
3.7%
14.7%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of December 31, 2006
(1) Enrolled in EI - Children were included if they had an IFSP at any time during the period, regardless of the length of time.
(2) Medicaid - Children were counted as having Medicaid if the "Medicaid" field in KIDS was equal to 'Yes'.
(3) Commercial Insurance - Children were counted as having insurance if there was an insurance record present for the child in KIDS. This includes both insurance companies that are
regulated by NYS and those that are not. It is estimated that 27.9% of the children enrolled in EI are covered by an insurance company regulated by NYS.
(4) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 10 - Number and Percent of Claims Submitted to Commercial Insurers And Percent of Claims Denied by Insurers. January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006
Claims
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess (1)
Erie (1)
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee (1)
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe (1)
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara (1)
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans(1)
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk(1)
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne (1)
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City (1)
ROS
STATE
Submitted
12,740
1,578
12,935
2,459
5,103
5,472
3,695
1,896
11,087
1,476
2,318
1,523
11,211
50,205
701
1,347
506
5,021
2,411
80
3,034
2,074
926
3,089
2,164
39,571
3,018
93,350
16,188
12,531
19,453
9,003
72,413
1,551
3,767
1,418
5,938
15,746
45,813
1,374
10,530
2,240
4,266
483
1,354
2,074
130,677
6,581
2,764
9,630
13,423
8,870
4,101
9,343
119,104
3,365
715
229,818
815,705
1,045,523
Reconciled (2)
14,590
1,485
13,045
2,519
4,195
4,837
188
1,774
10,060
1,469
2,649
1,438
10,560
49,659
183
1,364
481
4,946
2,827
28
1,833
1,724
869
3,670
2,219
39,187
3,044
77,468
16,041
13,166
15,596
7,530
74,021
1,551
3,668
1,143
7,515
12,395
53,106
1,247
6,330
2,512
4,538
212
1,360
1,385
110,641
6,275
2,048
9,435
15,328
8,189
4,169
9,343
133,869
3,298
860
229,818
785,082
1,014,900
Denied
10,872
628
7,342
1,476
3,387
2,763
83
302
5,740
730
1,756
1,169
8,242
28,909
70
457
275
4,324
1,738
20
1,741
947
422
1,069
986
33,176
2,541
29,170
12,347
5,455
9,594
6,147
58,214
1,174
3,114
844
6,022
10,234
28,192
621
4,574
1,633
4,032
65
916
1,101
79,144
4,246
860
3,975
13,279
6,859
3,433
8,030
106,512
2,397
745
171,452
534,094
705,546
Percent Denied /
Reconciled (3)
74.5%
42.3%
56.3%
58.6%
80.7%
57.1%
44.1%
17.0%
57.1%
49.7%
66.3%
81.3%
78.0%
58.2%
38.3%
33.5%
57.2%
87.4%
61.5%
71.4%
95.0%
54.9%
48.6%
29.1%
44.4%
84.7%
83.5%
37.7%
77.0%
41.4%
61.5%
81.6%
78.6%
75.7%
84.9%
73.8%
80.1%
82.6%
53.1%
49.8%
72.3%
65.0%
88.8%
30.7%
67.4%
79.5%
71.5%
67.7%
42.0%
42.1%
86.6%
83.8%
82.3%
85.9%
79.6%
72.7%
86.6%
74.6%
68.0%
69.5%
Data Sources: KIDS data complete as of 12/06. Municipal Fiscal Agent Reports submitted 2/07.
(1) Data from these counties were submitted via a special report created to capture data from fiscal agents. All other data were collected and submitted by
counties using KIDS.
(2) Claims Reconciled - These are claims submitted to insurers that were subsequently denied, paid, or partially paid between January 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2006. Reconcilation data from fiscal agents include only claims submitted in the reporting period. Reconcilation data from KIDS include
claims reconciled during the period, regardless of when they were submitted. The number of claims submitted may not equal the number reconciled since
some reconciled claims were submitted prior to January 1.
(3) Percent Denied/Reconciled - Number of claims denied divided by claims reconciled in reporting period.
Table 11 - Reasons for Commercial Insurers' Denial of Early Intervention Claims by Number and Percent of Denials. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess (1)
Erie (1)
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee (1)
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe (1)
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara (1)
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans(1)
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk (1)
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne (1)
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City (1)
ROS
STATE
Claims
Denied In
Reporting
Period (2)
Reasons For Denial
Service Not
Covered
10,872
1,864
628
151
7,342
2,034
1,476
411
3,387
2,790
2,763
1,388
83
14
302
0
5,740
99
730
413
1,756
1,234
1,169
611
8,242
1,122
28,909
1,177
70
41
457
88
275
40
4,324
102
1,738
624
20
19
1,741
850
947
467
422
72
1,069
535
986
131
33,176
2,033
2,541
1,186
29,170
8,345
12,347
264
5,455
1,832
9,594
3,352
6,147
1,591
58,214 12,666
1,174
69
3,114
2,418
844
201
6,022
1,791
10,234
3,433
28,192 12,473
621
74
4,574
1,886
1,633
502
4,032
3,849
65
0
916
638
1,101
362
79,144 22,355
4,246
430
860
493
3,975
1,662
13,279
2,360
6,859
3,030
3,433
943
8,030
313
106,512 33,311
2,397
569
745
272
171,452 15,134
534,094 140,980
705,546 156,114
No Response
From Insurer
17.3%
520
24.0%
3
27.7%
947
27.8%
0
82.4%
2
50.7%
256
16.9%
0
0.0%
0
1.7%
515
56.7%
0
70.6%
0
52.3%
51
13.6%
161
4.1%
16
58.6%
0
19.3%
0
14.5%
0
2.4%
25
15
35.9%
95.0%
0
48.8%
85
49.3%
39
17.1%
24
50.0%
0
13.3%
0
6.1%
68
46.7%
156
29.8%
122
2.1%
13
33.6%
5
35.2%
0
25.9%
92
21.8% 10,531
5.9%
0
77.6%
355
23.8%
99
29.7%
1,389
33.5%
271
44.2%
64
12.6%
0
41.5%
0
30.7%
0
95.5%
150
0.0%
0
69.7%
44
32.9%
3
28.2%
5,865
10.1%
181
57.7%
101
41.8%
35
17.8%
545
44.4%
20
27.5%
430
3.9%
7
31.3% 16,591
23.7%
6
36.5%
94
8.8% 109,884
26.5% 39,896
22.2% 149,780
4.8%
0.5%
12.9%
0.0%
0.1%
9.3%
0.0%
0.0%
9.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
2.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.9%
0.0%
4.9%
4.1%
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
6.1%
0.4%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
1.5%
18.1%
0.0%
11.4%
11.7%
23.1%
2.6%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
0.0%
4.8%
0.3%
7.4%
4.3%
11.8%
0.9%
4.1%
0.3%
12.5%
0.1%
15.6%
0.3%
12.6%
64.1%
7.5%
21.3%
Other Denial
3,563 33.0%
92 14.6%
1,061 14.5%
2
0.1%
97
2.9%
323 11.8%
0
0.0%
302 100.0%
545
9.5%
147 20.2%
135
7.7%
105
9.0%
536
6.5%
4,120 14.3%
0
0.0%
344 75.3%
159 57.8%
75
1.7%
223 12.8%
0
0.0%
49
2.8%
73
7.7%
32
7.6%
60
5.6%
267 27.2%
447
1.3%
55
2.2%
4,837 17.3%
135
1.1%
542
9.9%
2,129 22.4%
351
5.7%
7,666 13.2%
13
1.1%
52
1.7%
27
3.2%
554
9.2%
705
6.9%
10,449 37.1%
141 24.1%
156
3.4%
447 27.4%
1
0.0%
0
0.0%
9
1.0%
296 26.9%
19,879 25.1%
1,161 27.3%
146 17.1%
1,675 42.1%
1,391 10.5%
422
6.2%
15
0.4%
81
1.0%
5,294
5.0%
139
5.8%
34
4.6%
2,218
1.3%
71,559 13.4%
73,777 10.5%
Not Medically
Necessary
95
0
62
0
48
0
0
0
366
48
43
0
2,233
10
0
1
0
674
1
0
0
0
0
0
71
16,101
0
3,832
32
1,366
256
3,407
5,745
240
0
14
17
755
7
12
1
9
0
0
7
9
41
83
2
18
8
106
20
4,884
8,285
0
0
14,315
48,909
63,224
0.9%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
6.6%
2.5%
0.0%
27.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
15.6%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.2%
48.5%
0.0%
13.7%
0.3%
25.0%
2.7%
55.4%
9.9%
20.4%
0.0%
1.7%
0.3%
7.4%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
0.1%
2.0%
0.2%
0.5%
0.1%
1.6%
0.6%
60.8%
7.8%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
9.2%
9.0%
Out-of-Network
Provider
1,923
0
429
27
0
0
0
0
1,878
15
0
53
1,056
432
0
0
0
1,718
152
0
0
7
0
27
2
2,886
137
5,101
5,175
340
621
0
4,653
602
0
150
709
3,594
737
32
303
180
0
0
2
0
6,663
159
8
1
1,379
490
0
725
12,679
93
34
3,033
55,172
58,205
17.8%
0.0%
5.8%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
32.8%
2.1%
0.0%
4.5%
12.8%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
39.7%
8.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2.5%
0.2%
8.7%
5.4%
18.2%
41.9%
6.2%
6.5%
0.0%
8.0%
51.3%
0.0%
17.8%
11.8%
35.1%
2.6%
5.5%
6.7%
11.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
8.4%
3.7%
0.9%
0.0%
10.4%
7.2%
0.0%
9.0%
11.9%
3.9%
4.6%
1.8%
10.4%
8.3%
No Preauthorization Obtained
(3)
1,704
0
1,058
203
0
0
0
0
14
18
54
114
2,453
1,021
3
0
0
10
322
1
508
109
21
11
0
1
528
1,365
45
565
683
0
10,864
44
107
0
60
546
924
4
1,571
10
0
0
11
0
7,609
671
2
66
6,088
1,311
1,086
4
10,175
451
57
3,869
52,472
56,341
15.8%
0.0%
14.4%
13.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
2.5%
3.1%
9.8%
29.8%
3.5%
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
18.5%
5.0%
29.2%
11.5%
5.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.8%
4.9%
0.4%
10.4%
7.2%
0.0%
18.7%
3.7%
3.4%
0.0%
1.0%
5.3%
3.3%
0.7%
34.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
9.6%
15.8%
0.2%
1.7%
45.8%
19.2%
31.6%
0.0%
9.6%
18.8%
7.7%
2.3%
9.9%
8.0%
Data Sources: KIDS data complete as of 12/06. Municipal Fiscal Agent Reports submitted 2/07.
(1) Data from these counties were submitted via a special report created to capture data from fiscal agents. All other data were collected and
submitted by counties using KIDS.
(2) 1,675 claims were excluded because the reason for denial was not recorded.
(3) Data reported in this column include both denials by insurers when municipalities sought preauthorization, and denials when preauthorization
was not sought.
Table 11 - Reasons for Commercial Insurers' Denial of Early Intervention Claims by Number and Percent of Denials. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Reasons For Denial
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess (1)
Erie (1)
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee (1)
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe (1)
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara (1)
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans(1)
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk (1)
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne (1)
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City (1)
ROS
STATE
Benefits Exhausted
483
189
277
743
41
550
0
0
1,289
5
133
1
228
20,647
25
4
71
273
31
0
0
28
240
267
125
6,690
342
1,235
2,340
493
474
589
2,135
61
0
0
42
395
705
166
191
331
0
0
89
0
2,799
275
0
148
7
442
271
879
6,170
760
81
1,073
53,760
54,833
4.5%
30.1%
3.8%
50.3%
1.2%
20.1%
0.0%
0.0%
22.5%
0.7%
7.6%
0.1%
2.8%
71.4%
35.7%
0.9%
25.8%
6.3%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
56.9%
25.0%
12.7%
20.2%
13.5%
4.4%
19.0%
9.0%
5.0%
9.6%
3.7%
5.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
3.9%
2.5%
28.4%
4.2%
20.3%
0.0%
0.0%
9.7%
0.0%
3.5%
6.5%
0.0%
3.7%
0.1%
6.5%
7.9%
10.9%
5.8%
31.7%
10.9%
0.6%
10.1%
7.8%
Exceeds Insurer's
Claiming Limit
0
0
243
4
220
97
46
0
802
15
13
18
108
1,014
0
0
0
1,441
7
0
0
30
23
123
73
3,738
0
468
3,233
80
532
98
1,469
119
50
34
574
257
2,576
10
29
62
0
65
28
225
6,791
340
0
105
511
248
239
874
7,868
89
53
2,737
35,042
37,779
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.3%
6.5%
3.5%
55.4%
0.0%
14.0%
2.1%
0.7%
1.5%
1.3%
3.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
5.5%
11.5%
7.4%
11.3%
0.0%
1.7%
26.2%
1.5%
5.6%
1.6%
2.5%
10.1%
1.6%
4.0%
9.5%
2.5%
9.1%
1.7%
0.6%
3.8%
0.0%
100.0%
3.1%
20.4%
8.6%
8.0%
0.0%
2.6%
3.8%
3.6%
7.0%
10.9%
7.4%
3.7%
7.1%
1.6%
6.6%
5.4%
Child Not Covered
502
193
612
43
187
126
23
0
175
25
134
18
187
472
1
20
5
6
99
0
249
171
10
45
0
948
137
1,879
117
232
997
19
2,014
8
61
84
414
272
198
118
388
77
32
0
37
134
7,127
795
67
149
683
747
418
135
3,425
289
104
11,705
25,408
37,113
4.6%
30.7%
8.3%
2.9%
5.5%
4.6%
27.7%
0.0%
3.1%
3.4%
7.7%
1.5%
2.3%
1.6%
1.4%
4.4%
1.8%
0.1%
5.7%
0.0%
14.3%
18.1%
2.4%
4.2%
0.0%
2.9%
5.4%
6.7%
0.9%
4.3%
10.5%
0.3%
3.5%
0.7%
2.0%
10.0%
6.9%
2.7%
0.7%
20.2%
8.5%
4.7%
0.8%
0.0%
4.0%
12.2%
9.0%
18.7%
7.8%
3.7%
5.1%
10.9%
12.2%
1.7%
3.2%
12.1%
14.0%
6.8%
4.8%
5.3%
No Primary Care
Physician Referral
47
0
619
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
95
158
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
23
264
0
657
993
0
473
0
324
18
26
235
471
6
59
8
8
0
0
0
2
72
0
151
21
115
307
10
11
128
2,565
0
16
1,704
7,916
9,620
0.4%
0.0%
8.4%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
8.1%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.8%
0.0%
2.3%
8.0%
0.0%
5.0%
0.0%
0.6%
1.5%
0.8%
27.8%
7.8%
0.1%
0.2%
1.4%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
6.5%
0.0%
3.6%
2.5%
2.9%
2.3%
0.1%
0.3%
1.6%
2.4%
0.0%
2.1%
1.0%
1.5%
1.4%
Technical Error
65
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
41
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
49
0
4
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
5,731
231
5,962
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
0.8%
Government
Service Blanket
Rejection
35
0
0
34
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
103
0
0
0
0
0
0
264
0
0
0
0
1
290
0
0
122
0
0
0
0
119
0
35
0
0
0
0
20
14
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
49
1,074
1,123
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
8.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
29.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.2%
Data Sources: KIDS data complete as of 12/06. Municipal Fiscal Agent Reports submitted 2/07.
(1) Data from these counties were submitted via a special report created to capture data from fiscal agents. All other data were collected and
submitted by counties using KIDS.
(2) 1,675 claims were excluded because the reason for denial was not recorded.
(3) Data reported in this column include both denials by insurers when municipalities sought preauthorization, and denials when preauthorization
was not sought.
Table 12 - Number and Amount of Claims Submitted By Municipalities to Medicaid By Payment Status. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Claims
Submitted
15,763
2,415
15,928
2,267
1,168
11,314
5,230
2,015
17,605
2,960
3,759
2,302
12,829
67,355
1,085
2,822
3,499
9,620
3,677
0
3,433
4,364
2,713
2,855
3,386
30,047
4,255
58,991
16,789
18,036
38,428
6,855
25,337
4,080
11,325
3,696
2,031
14,492
68,903
5,747
6,551
11,099
2,900
479
1,321
8,660
40,638
7,663
3,092
6,332
624
3,318
5,168
10,343
76,851
2,694
2,032
2,464,257
699,141
3,163,398
Data Source: OMM/DOIT, report received 2/16/07
Claims
15,495
2,373
15,896
2,160
1,164
11,184
5,122
1,899
17,463
2,889
3,759
2,246
12,307
67,302
1,085
2,787
3,402
9,619
3,517
0
3,372
4,336
2,655
2,837
3,362
29,951
4,151
57,039
16,582
17,832
38,254
6,733
24,083
4,058
11,280
3,689
1,977
14,332
68,869
5,700
6,456
10,419
2,829
421
1,177
8,587
39,792
7,416
3,006
5,946
579
3,259
4,800
10,129
75,757
2,688
2,028
2,154,267
688,050
2,842,317
Claims Paid
Amount
Percent
98.3%
$964,024.40
98.3%
$173,005.82
99.8%
$1,020,118.46
95.3%
$136,796.43
99.7%
$75,089.00
98.9%
$700,504.03
97.9%
$334,203.50
94.2%
$152,793.32
99.2%
$1,148,363.97
97.6%
$181,340.91
100.0%
$208,154.20
97.6%
$158,941.25
95.9%
$798,992.34
99.9%
$3,715,368.70
100.0%
$69,073.00
98.8%
$161,982.20
97.2%
$223,769.00
100.0%
$710,540.46
95.6%
$225,423.00
na
$0.00
98.2%
$200,606.00
99.4%
$267,490.86
97.9%
$136,964.61
99.4%
$169,048.62
99.3%
$199,246.50
99.7%
$2,011,745.79
97.6%
$279,586.00
96.7%
$4,837,911.36
98.8%
$934,293.75
98.9%
$1,067,457.64
99.5%
$2,251,132.87
98.2%
$387,632.99
95.1%
$1,735,313.66
$292,063.12
99.5%
99.6%
$723,060.50
99.8%
$218,148.53
97.3%
$138,485.14
98.9%
$914,798.00
100.0%
$5,495,263.42
99.2%
$376,650.22
98.5%
$398,383.50
93.9%
$576,162.12
97.6%
$183,633.90
87.9%
$26,707.75
89.1%
$62,244.37
99.2%
$572,853.75
97.9%
$3,485,833.81
96.8%
$572,029.75
97.2%
$203,213.15
93.9%
$344,042.49
92.8%
$44,289.50
98.2%
$202,420.53
92.9%
$295,872.50
97.9%
$677,575.83
98.6%
$4,715,607.02
99.8%
$174,007.12
99.8%
$119,726.00
87.4% $175,713,369.95
98.4%
$46,449,986.66
89.9% $222,163,356.61
Claims
268
42
32
107
4
130
108
116
142
71
0
56
522
53
0
35
97
1
160
0
61
28
58
18
24
96
104
1,952
207
204
174
122
1,254
22
45
7
54
160
34
47
95
680
71
58
144
73
846
247
86
386
45
59
368
214
1,094
6
4
309,990
11,091
321,081
Claims Denied
Percent
1.7%
1.7%
0.2%
4.7%
0.3%
1.1%
2.1%
5.8%
0.8%
2.4%
0.0%
2.4%
4.1%
0.1%
0.0%
1.2%
2.8%
0.0%
4.4%
na
1.8%
0.6%
2.1%
0.6%
0.7%
0.3%
2.4%
3.3%
1.2%
1.1%
0.5%
1.8%
4.9%
0.5%
0.4%
0.2%
2.7%
1.1%
0.0%
0.8%
1.5%
6.1%
2.4%
12.1%
10.9%
0.8%
2.1%
3.2%
2.8%
6.1%
7.2%
1.8%
7.1%
2.1%
1.4%
0.2%
0.2%
12.6%
1.6%
10.1%
Amount
$18,172.00
$2,982.50
$2,336.00
$6,402.00
$206.00
$9,700.00
$4,702.00
$9,640.00
$7,689.00
$4,455.00
$0.00
$2,870.75
$36,478.00
$1,660.00
$0.00
$2,820.25
$5,239.00
$165.00
$6,867.00
$0.00
$3,641.00
$1,680.00
$3,500.75
$655.50
$826.50
$11,562.25
$6,929.00
$166,074.00
$11,257.00
$13,010.25
$11,837.75
$8,145.50
$84,060.25
$1,184.00
$3,914.50
$134.00
$3,465.00
$9,559.00
$2,605.00
$3,094.50
$6,466.00
$28,597.00
$5,436.00
$2,593.00
$8,577.00
$4,942.25
$74,658.00
$19,993.75
$5,820.00
$21,675.00
$3,784.75
$2,982.00
$20,792.00
$13,859.75
$56,110.00
$326.00
$70.00
$25,599,979.75
$746,202.75
$26,346,182.50
Table 13 - Number of Claims Submitted By Municipalities and Denied by Medicaid By Reason for Denial. January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
ROS
STATE
Total
Denials
268
42
32
107
4
130
108
116
142
71
0
56
522
53
0
35
97
1
160
0
61
28
58
18
24
96
104
1,951
207
204
174
122
1,254
22
45
7
54
160
34
47
95
680
71
58
144
73
846
247
86
386
45
59
368
214
1,094
6
4
309,989
11,090
321,079
Data Source: OMM/DOIT
Third Party
Recipient Coverage Service
Recipient Recipient Recipient
Indicated/O
Indicates
Date Not
Duplicate
Sex or
Ineligible
Not On
ther
Capitation Claims Within 90
Claim In
Birth Date
On
Restricted
Insurance
And Prepaid
Days Of
History
Not Equal Service
Recipient
Amt Not
Capitation Plan
Receipt
File
Date
File
Submitted
Refer Service Only
Date
0
4
1
1
4
0
17
11
0
2
0
0
1
5
0
0
17
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
184
0
1
14
6
90
0
9
0
0
0
14
1
0
0
0
0
92
17
20
10
1
8
0
25
0
37
29
6
0
94,164
632
94,796
105
26
31
48
0
111
0
105
22
58
0
0
179
0
0
33
20
0
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
8
90
1,149
9
62
95
99
311
6
23
0
12
66
0
1
29
0
47
0
2
28
53
4
64
67
30
12
32
114
29
0
0
81,272
3,213
84,485
69
0
0
0
0
19
44
0
0
0
0
0
52
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
37
0
0
40
0
19
0
8
0
18
8
16
0
66
22
0
0
0
28
73
233
0
35
14
0
0
2
9
0
0
77,009
834
77,843
92
12
0
37
0
0
0
0
120
0
0
56
289
0
0
0
49
1
88
0
28
28
58
0
1
62
0
467
147
141
25
17
609
1
5
7
24
70
0
45
0
477
24
0
2
0
123
0
21
187
0
0
336
59
749
0
3
54,958
4,460
59,418
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
12
0
0
0
0
41
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
89
6
0
0
0
125
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
84
0
52
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
136
0
1
910
606
1,516
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
22
0
0
0
0
0
1,372
55
1,427
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
0
577
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
626
626
Claim
Recipient Not
Provider
Authorized For Not Equal
CMCM/MSC/
Restriction
IRA On Service Recipient
Date
File
Provider
0
0
0
9
0
0
7
0
0
2
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
24
43
0
0
0
37
7
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
55
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
132
0
0
12
376
388
0
0
0
4
0
0
40
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
1
16
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
63
0
0
0
2
10
0
0
4
210
214
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
1
0
0
0
0
28
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
289
79
368