NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DIVISION OF FAMILY HEALTH
BUREAU OF EARLY INTERVENTION
NYS EARLY INTERVENTION
PROGRAM
REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE JANUARY 1, 2007 – DECEMBER 31, 2007
New York State Department of Health Division of Family Health Bureau of Early Intervention
Early Intervention Program Annual Report to the Legislature January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007 Under Section 2557 of the Public Health Law (PHL), the Department of Health is
required to prepare and submit an annual report to the Governor and Legislature,
for the Early Intervention Program (EIP). Specifically, the Department is required
to report data, by municipality, on the EIP for the purposes of improving the
efficiency, cost effectiveness, and quality of the EIP. This report covers the
period from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007.
Data Collection Methods
Since the inception of the EIP, the Department has supplied municipalities with a
software application, known as the Kids Integrated Data System (KIDS), to use
for the collection of data, local management of EIP activities, payment of bills
submitted by providers, and processing of claims to commercial insurers,
Medicaid, and the Department. The Department maintains the KIDS application
and periodically issues revised versions of the application to municipalities to
meet new program requirements and/or improve data collection capabilities.
All fifty-eight municipalities use KIDS for data collection and to assist with the
management of program activities. All municipalities, with the exception of New
York City, use the billing and claiming components of KIDS. New York City uses
a contractor for its provider payment and claiming processes. The following
other counties also used fiscal agents during the current reporting period to
manage their claiming procedures, but use KIDS for claims processing:
Dutchess, Erie, Genesee, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans, Suffolk, and Wayne.
KIDS is a distributed data system. Data are collected locally using KIDS and
submitted to the Department four to five times per year. The Department
maintains and regularly updates its state-level database on the EIP, using
quarterly data submitted by municipalities. This state-level database is used by
the Department for program management purposes and to comply with federal
and State reporting requirements, including this report.
In addition to KIDS, the Department maintains a Fiscal System application, which
it uses to process all claims submitted by municipalities for State reimbursement.
In accordance with State law, municipalities must submit claims for payment
within two years of the date of service.
Page 1 of 6
Data Table Descriptions and Data Limitations
Section 2557 of PHL requires the Department to report on data collected from
January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. Child and provider data included
in this report are based on data submitted to the Department by municipalities in
May 15, 2008 and are complete through March 31, 2008. Medicaid data were
supplied by the Office of Health Insurance Programs, using the Medicaid
Management Information System.
As required under Section 2557(4) of PHL, data are reported by county, New
York City, and the Rest of State excluding New York City, and State.
The following describes the data included in each of the tables, along with
limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data.
Table 1 presents the number of children enrolled in the EIP by age. Children
with an IFSP continuing in the program are assigned to an age group based on
their age on January 1, and children entering the program in 2007 were assigned
to an age group based on their age on the date of the initial IFSP.
Tables 2 and 3 present the number and percent of children authorized to receive
a single service and authorized to receive multiple services, respectively, by type
of service.
For the purposes of these analyses, service coordination,
evaluations, transportation, assistive technology devices, and respite services
are excluded. For Table 2, a child is counted as receiving a single service if s/he
was authorized to receive only one type of general early intervention service
(e.g., physical therapy only, speech therapy only, or occupational therapy only.)
during the entire time period, regardless of the length of time during the reporting
period for which the service was authorized. For example, if a child received an
initial IFSP in October, and was authorized to receive speech language therapy
and no other service for the months of November and December, the child is
counted as receiving a single service. For Table 3, a child is counted as
receiving multiple services if s/he was authorized to receive two or more services
at any time during the entire time period, regardless of whether authorizations for
each type of service were overlapping or consecutive (e.g., consecutive weeks or
months between January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007). Each child is counted
under every service type for which they were authorized during this twelve-month
period. For example, if a child received an initial IFSP in July, was authorized to
receive physical therapy in September, and occupational therapy in December,
the child is counted as receiving multiple services, and is counted under both
service types. As a result of children being counted repeatedly across different
service types, the sum of percentages across the service types is more than
100%.
Page 2 of 6
Table 4 presents the number of State-approved agencies 1 and independent
(individual) service providers that were under direct contract with one or more
municipalities, and therefore were available to provide services to children during
this time period, by service specialty, in full-time equivalents (FTEs). Agency and
individual providers that are only approved by the Department and not reported
as under contract, either by a municipality or by an approved agency (for
individuals), are not included. These data are derived from applications
submitted by providers at the time State approval is sought, and do not include
changes after the initial application to the Department. Provider contract status is
reported periodically to the Department by municipalities. These data likely
underrepresent the current FTEs available to deliver early intervention services,
particularly for agency providers.
Tables 5 and 6 present the number and percent of children authorized to receive
a single service and multiple services, respectively, by the type of provider
authorized to deliver the service(s) to the child. Table 5 displays the data by
agency and individual provider. Table 6 presents the data by agency only,
individual only, and both individual and agency, since children authorized to
receive multiple services may be authorized to receive services from both
agencies and individual providers.
Table 7 displays the number of State-approved providers under contract with
municipalities to provide evaluations, and the number and percent of evaluators
who delivered services to children whom they evaluated.
Table 8 displays the number and percent of children whose families were
authorized to receive supportive services, which are defined as family training,
counseling, parent support groups, or respite.
Table 9 displays the number and percent of children who were reported to have
some form of third party insurance coverage during the reporting period.
Children with unknown insurance status had no commercial insurance coverage
or Medicaid coverage information reported during the time period.
Table 10 displays the number and percent of claims submitted to commercial
insurers and the claims denied by insurers that were reconciled during the
reporting period. Data submitted by municipalities using KIDS include claims
submitted to insurers prior to January 1, 2007 that were subsequently denied,
paid, or partially paid by insurers and reconciled between January 1, 2007 and
December 31, 2007. Data reported by fiscal agents under contract with
1
Under EIP regulations, an agency means incorporated entities, sole proprietorships, partnerships, and state
operated facilities operating under the approval of any state early intervention agency. “Individual”
providers means qualified individuals with appropriate licensure, certification, or registration identified as
qualified personnel for purposes of the EIP.
Page 3 of 6
municipalities to perform claiming functions include only those claims that were
both submitted and reconciled during the period.
Table 11 displays the number and percent of claims submitted by municipalities
that were denied by commercial insurers by reason of denial. The following are
definitions used to report reasons for denial of claims by insurers:
• Service Not Covered - Denial of payment by an insurer for a service
known to be in the child benefit package, for one of the following reasons:
not a covered service, equipment, or device; or denied based on location
of service (e.g., home or community setting).
• No Response from Insurer - No response from an insurer after repeated
contact attempts by the municipality.
• Other Denial - Denial of payment for any reason other than those
mentioned.
• Not Medically Necessary - Denial of payment by an insurer when
preauthorization was sought and denied by the insurer or when the insurer
has determined, independent of any preauthorization requirement, that the
service was not medically necessary.
• Out-of-Network Provider - Denial of payment by an insurer based on the
use of a non-participating provider.
• No Preauthorization Obtained - Denial of payment because
preauthorization for the service was required, but was not sought and/or
obtained by the municipality. Several municipalities indicated to the
Department that this field was also used to report denials when
preauthorization was sought, and the insurer denied the preauthorization.
• Benefits Exhausted - Denial of payment when policy limits have been
reached (either visit limits or amount of reimbursement). This includes
claims not submitted by municipalities to insurers upon notification that
benefits have been exhausted.
• Exceeds Insurer’s Claiming Limit - Denial of payment by an insurer when
the claim exceeds the timeframe from date of service required by the
insurer.
• Child Not Covered - Denial of payment by the insurer for services
delivered to a child at a time when the child was not covered by the
insurer (e.g., policy terminated or not renewed or services provided prior
to the effective date).
• No Primary Care Physician Referral - Denial of payment by an insurer for
failure to obtain a referral from the primary care provider prior to the
provision of services (including evaluation services).
• Technical Errors - Denial of payment by an insurer due to technical errors
on the claim, such as incorrect policy number, incorrect procedure code,
incorrect or missing diagnosis, incorrect date of service, or duplicate dates
of service.
• Government Service Blanket Rejection - Denial of payment by an insurer
because the service was provided by a governmental program.
Page 4 of 6
Tables 12 and 13 display the number and amount of claims submitted to
Medicaid by payment status (Table 12), and reasons for denial of claims (Table
13).
Department Guidance and Oversight of the EIP
The Department used these and other data to improve ongoing state-level
management and oversight of the EIP through the actions described below.
• A statewide monitoring system to review municipal administration of the
EIP and agency and individual providers engaged in the service delivery
system. Through its contractor, IPRO, the Department has completed two
cycles of monitoring for all agency and individual providers contracted to
deliver early intervention services and has completed a second monitoring
cycle of the 58 municipalities as service providers. In addition, two
monitoring cycles of the municipalities as local administrators will be
completed by November 2008. A total of 1,906 comprehensive reviews
were conducted during the first cycle of monitoring and 1,588 during the
second cycle to date. Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) are required and
submitted when deficiencies are identified. Immediate remediation of
serious deficiencies is required, with municipal oversight of remediation
efforts. Focused site reviews are also conducted to ensure remediation
has been completed according to the terms of the approved corrective
action plan. To date, 398 focused reviews have been completed.
• Implementation of an auditing program for the EIP, including development
and dissemination of an audit protocol for use in auditing providers and
municipalities by the Department, and development of data-driven criteria
to prioritize provider audits.
• Continuation of State-level matches of the EIP and Medicaid eligibility files
to submit retroactive claims for federal Medicaid reimbursement. To date,
more than $109 million in federal reimbursement has been achieved
through this process since 1999.
• The Department continues work to develop a state-of-the-art web-based
data system to replace the EIP’s aging legacy system, KIDS. Known as
the New York State Early Intervention System (NYEIS), the new system
will handle current and future business, statutory, and regulatory
requirements and will employ proven hardware and software technology to
ensure that data security meets defined performance standards, is cost
effective, and easy to maintain and operate. NYEIS will provide controls
to support EIP’s legal and financial responsibilities and protect EIP’s
administrative and managerial integrity.
Page 5 of 6
While NYEIS will serve EIP’s most urgent needs, it will also provide a
basis on which additional functional modules can be deployed as needed.
It will provide the EIP with effective and efficient management tools on the
State and local levels for the administration, reporting, and analysis of
integrated EIP data. NYEIS will provide near-real-time interfaces to other
systems/agencies and external providers (such as Medicaid), which will
maximize reimbursement from Medicaid and third party insurances,
thereby reducing the costs for the EIP to the State and localities. It is
anticipated that NYEIS will be fully operational statewide in 2009.
• The Department continues to maintain the existing distributed data
system, KIDS, which captures information about children participating in
the EI program on the local level, and which assists municipalities in
claiming reimbursement for EI services from insurance, Medicaid, and the
State. These efforts include release of updated versions of KIDS to
implement technical improvements and correct identified problems, and
providing technical assistance and support to municipalities on the day-today operation of KIDS.
• The Department and State Education Department continue to provide
ongoing training and technical assistance to municipalities, EIP providers,
school district personnel, and parents to provide direction necessary to
ensure that children potentially in need of Preschool Special Education
receive an evaluation from their school districts by age three; and to
ensure the smooth and timely transition of all children from the EIP to
other services and supports, as needed.
• The Department continues to provide ongoing training and technical
assistance to municipalities, EIP providers, and parents to improve
evaluation procedures used to determine eligibility for children referred to
the EIP.
• Training contracts have been established to deliver ongoing statewide
training for providers, municipalities, and parents on a variety of topics
related to the EIP, and to develop new and revised curricula for the EIP.
• The Department holds an annual meeting with Early Intervention Officials/
Managers to disseminate information and discuss policy changes with
municipal officials responsible for local implementation of the EIP. It also
provides the municipalities with an opportunity to network and problemsolve with each other.
• The Department holds bimonthly conference calls with Early Intervention
Officials/Managers to provide training, technical assistance, program
updates and guidance.
Page 6 of 6
Table 1 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Enrolled in the Early Intervention Program By Age. January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007 Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
All Children
Enrolled (1)
460
66
578
196
227
287
204
112
357
144
130
120
1,057
2,467
77
103
75
198
145
3
73
189
67
152
102
1,931
84
4,264
663
477
1,280
178
1,415
112
363
91
168
487
2,236
151
498
280
70
40
72
237
3,236
229
152
321
483
224
162
289
3,854
82
51
34,419
31,769
66,188
Birth -< 1 Year Old
Number
Percent (3)
40
8.7%
10
15.2%
131
22.7%
34
17.3%
38
16.7%
58
20.2%
47
23.0%
19
17.0%
35
9.8%
15
10.4%
8
6.2%
24
20.0%
107
10.1%
296
12.0%
7
9.1%
6
5.8%
7
9.3%
17
8.6%
16
11.0%
0
0.0%
7
9.6%
23
12.2%
11
16.4%
25
16.4%
14
13.7%
216
11.2%
8
9.5%
467
11.0%
65
9.8%
58
12.2%
168
13.1%
20
11.2%
209
14.8%
19
17.0%
47
12.9%
18
19.8%
34
20.2%
61
12.5%
401
17.9%
15
9.9%
43
8.6%
32
11.4%
16
22.9%
6
15.0%
9
12.5%
28
11.8%
392
12.1%
48
21.0%
26
17.1%
38
11.8%
79
16.4%
26
11.6%
14
8.6%
27
9.3%
494
12.8%
3
3.7%
10
19.6%
4,298
12.5%
4,092
12.9%
8,390
12.7%
Age Group (2)
1 -< 2 Years Old
Number
Percent (3)
142
30.9%
20
30.3%
194
33.6%
53
27.0%
68
30.0%
83
28.9%
56
27.5%
44
39.3%
144
40.3%
54
37.5%
44
33.8%
36
30.0%
334
31.6%
666
27.0%
25
32.5%
28
27.2%
19
25.3%
76
38.4%
42
29.0%
0
0.0%
25
34.2%
61
32.3%
26
38.8%
47
30.9%
34
33.3%
603
31.2%
24
28.6%
1,234
28.9%
205
30.9%
128
26.8%
414
32.3%
57
32.0%
504
35.6%
29
25.9%
110
30.3%
20
22.0%
43
25.6%
154
31.6%
706
31.6%
72
47.7%
159
31.9%
89
31.8%
23
32.9%
12
30.0%
23
31.9%
83
35.0%
931
28.8%
75
32.8%
54
35.5%
112
34.9%
148
30.6%
96
42.9%
54
33.3%
81
28.0%
1,228
31.9%
26
31.7%
13
25.5%
9,715
28.2%
9,831
30.9%
19,546
29.5%
2 -< 3 Years Old
Number
Percent (3)
256
55.7%
33
50.0%
221
38.2%
106
54.1%
110
48.5%
139
48.4%
89
43.6%
49
43.8%
157
44.0%
68
47.2%
70
53.8%
55
45.8%
568
53.7%
1,435
58.2%
45
58.4%
64
62.1%
48
64.0%
95
48.0%
82
56.6%
2
66.7%
37
50.7%
97
51.3%
30
44.8%
75
49.3%
49
48.0%
970
50.2%
52
61.9%
2,308
54.1%
333
50.2%
272
57.0%
622
48.6%
83
46.6%
698
49.3%
63
56.3%
185
51.0%
50
54.9%
84
50.0%
256
52.6%
1,070
47.9%
57
37.7%
255
51.2%
146
52.1%
28
40.0%
18
45.0%
35
48.6%
111
46.8%
1,866
57.7%
103
45.0%
68
44.7%
140
43.6%
233
48.2%
98
43.8%
87
53.7%
166
57.4%
1,948
50.5%
43
52.4%
25
49.0%
17,410
50.6%
16,453
51.8%
33,863
51.2%
3+ Years Old
Number
Percent (3)
22
4.8%
3
4.5%
32
5.5%
3
1.5%
11
4.8%
7
2.4%
12
5.9%
0
0.0%
21
5.9%
7
4.9%
8
6.2%
5
4.2%
48
4.5%
70
2.8%
0
0.0%
5
4.9%
1
1.3%
10
5.1%
5
3.4%
1
33.3%
4
5.5%
8
4.2%
0
0.0%
5
3.3%
5
4.9%
142
7.4%
0
0.0%
255
6.0%
60
9.0%
19
4.0%
76
5.9%
18
10.1%
4
0.3%
1
0.9%
21
5.8%
3
3.3%
7
4.2%
16
3.3%
59
2.6%
7
4.6%
41
8.2%
13
4.6%
3
4.3%
4
10.0%
5
6.9%
15
6.3%
47
1.5%
3
1.3%
4
2.6%
31
9.7%
23
4.8%
4
1.8%
7
4.3%
15
5.2%
184
4.8%
10
12.2%
3
5.9%
2,996
8.7%
1,393
4.4%
4,389
6.6%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/2008
(1) Enrolled in EI - Children were counted if they were enrolled in EI at any time during the year, regardless of the length of time in the EIP. The "All Children Enrolled" total in this
table is greater than the sum of "Single Service Children" (Tables 2 & 5) and "Multiple Service Children" (Tables 3 & 6) because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for
services which were excluded in those tables, like service coordination or evaluations.
(2) Age - Children with an IFSP continuing in the program were assigned to an age category based on their age on January 1, and children entering the program were assigned to an
age category based on the date of the initial IFSP.
(3) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 2 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive A Single Early Intervention Service By Type of Service.
January 1, 2007- December 31, 2007
Service Type (1, 2)
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Single
Service
AT
Children
Service
170
0.0%
29
0.0%
259
0.0%
101
0.0%
97
0.0%
149
0.0%
95
0.0%
50
0.0%
154
0.0%
53
0.0%
61
0.0%
48
0.0%
450
0.0%
1,168
0.0%
41
0.0%
57
0.0%
23
0.0%
49
0.0%
50
0.0%
2
0.0%
21
0.0%
84
0.0%
21
0.0%
47
0.0%
41
0.0%
856
0.0%
33
0.0%
1,523
0.1%
284
0.0%
178
0.0%
458
0.0%
69
0.0%
506
0.0%
41
0.0%
127
0.0%
34
0.0%
67
0.0%
145
0.0%
630
0.0%
50
0.0%
201
0.0%
92
0.0%
24
0.0%
26
0.0%
32
0.0%
75
0.0%
1,024
0.0%
81
0.0%
74
0.0%
102
0.0%
183
0.0%
130
0.0%
79
0.0%
144
0.0%
1,483
0.1%
29
0.0%
22
0.0%
3,356
0.0%
12,122
0.0%
15,478
0.0%
Audiology
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
Fam
Cnsl/
Sup (3)
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.5%
0.8%
Nutrition
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
OT
2.9%
3.4%
5.0%
1.0%
3.1%
8.7%
5.3%
6.0%
0.6%
1.9%
1.6%
2.1%
1.6%
2.3%
0.0%
3.5%
8.7%
6.1%
0.0%
0.0%
9.5%
2.4%
9.5%
8.5%
2.4%
1.8%
6.1%
1.1%
1.4%
5.6%
2.8%
1.4%
2.0%
12.2%
1.6%
2.9%
0.0%
0.7%
3.5%
0.0%
0.5%
2.2%
4.2%
3.8%
3.1%
6.7%
1.2%
1.2%
2.7%
2.9%
1.1%
0.0%
1.3%
0.7%
2.4%
0.0%
4.5%
4.8%
2.2%
2.8%
PT
25.3%
37.9%
30.5%
25.7%
28.9%
23.5%
32.6%
32.0%
16.9%
9.4%
6.6%
22.9%
7.1%
15.6%
14.6%
5.3%
4.3%
10.2%
20.0%
0.0%
14.3%
9.5%
19.0%
27.7%
31.7%
16.2%
18.2%
30.8%
13.4%
21.3%
21.8%
18.8%
28.3%
7.3%
16.5%
44.1%
37.3%
15.9%
34.9%
10.0%
9.5%
19.6%
41.7%
19.2%
21.9%
10.7%
34.7%
40.7%
32.4%
16.7%
19.1%
14.6%
7.6%
11.8%
28.7%
17.2%
4.5%
24.0%
23.6%
23.7%
Psych
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
Social
Wk
Spec Inst Speech
0.6%
5.9%
65.3%
0.0%
20.7%
37.9%
0.0%
2.7%
58.7%
0.0%
3.0%
69.3%
1.0%
5.2%
61.9%
0.0%
4.7%
63.1%
0.0%
4.2%
57.9%
0.0%
8.0%
52.0%
0.0%
3.2%
79.2%
1.9%
1.9%
84.9%
1.6%
14.8%
75.4%
0.0%
22.9%
52.1%
0.0%
5.1%
85.1%
0.2%
2.1%
79.6%
0.0%
0.0%
85.4%
0.0%
17.5%
71.9%
0.0%
13.0%
73.9%
0.0%
16.3%
67.3%
0.0%
2.0%
78.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.0%
14.3%
61.9%
0.0%
4.8%
82.1%
0.0%
14.3%
57.1%
0.0%
14.9%
48.9%
0.0%
14.6%
51.2%
0.0%
2.1%
79.2%
0.0%
6.1%
69.7%
0.1%
3.2%
64.0%
0.0%
1.1%
84.2%
0.0%
5.1%
68.0%
0.0%
6.3%
68.3%
0.0%
4.3%
75.4%
0.4%
6.9%
61.1%
0.0%
9.8%
70.7%
0.0%
35.4%
46.5%
0.0%
14.7%
38.2%
0.0%
17.9%
44.8%
0.7%
3.4%
79.3%
0.0%
5.6%
55.7%
0.0%
46.0%
44.0%
0.5%
3.0%
85.6%
1.1%
7.6%
69.6%
0.0%
4.2%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
76.9%
0.0%
12.5%
62.5%
0.0%
20.0%
62.7%
0.0%
4.0%
57.0%
2.5%
0.0%
55.6%
0.0%
6.8%
58.1%
1.0%
1.0%
78.4%
3.8%
4.9%
69.9%
0.0%
1.5%
83.8%
0.0%
1.3%
89.9%
0.0%
4.9%
81.9%
0.0%
9.4%
59.1%
0.0%
0.0%
82.8%
0.0%
9.1%
81.8%
0.4%
23.8%
44.8%
0.2%
5.6%
67.6%
0.2%
9.6%
62.7%
Vision
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/2008
(1) These data exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in this table and "Multiple
Service Children" in Table 3 will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services like service
coordination or evaluations.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
(3) Fam Cnsl/Sup. - Family Counseling, Family Support Group and Family Training were combined into one category for this report.
Table 3 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive Multiple Early Intervention Services By Type of Service.
January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007
Service Type (1, 2)
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Mult.
Service
AT
Children Service
266
1.1%
34
0.0%
295
0.0%
93
1.1%
78
0.0%
133
0.0%
103
0.0%
61
0.0%
0.0%
200
83
2.4%
65
0.0%
68
0.0%
572
0.2%
1,195
3.3%
35
0.0%
45
0.0%
49
0.0%
147
21.1%
93
0.0%
1
0.0%
51
0.0%
98
0.0%
45
0.0%
104
2.9%
61
0.0%
1,054
0.4%
51
0.0%
2,626
1.4%
337
7.1%
294
0.0%
804
0.1%
108
0.0%
859
0.9%
64
1.6%
227
0.0%
56
0.0%
97
32.0%
328
0.6%
1,580
0.2%
100
0.0%
289
0.0%
182
0.0%
42
0.0%
10
0.0%
37
0.0%
154
3.2%
2,088
2.4%
140
5.7%
77
0.0%
200
0.0%
294
0.3%
93
0.0%
81
0.0%
142
0.7%
2,206
10.2%
48
10.4%
26
3.8%
28,155
0.4%
18,669
2.6%
46,824
1.3%
Audiology
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
1.6%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.3%
2.4%
0.0%
12.3%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.8%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.7%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.5%
Fam
Cnsl/
Sup (3) Nursing
8.6%
0.4%
23.5%
0.0%
20.3%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
6.0%
0.0%
12.0%
0.0%
3.1%
4.6%
2.9%
0.0%
33.2%
0.0%
14.5%
0.0%
5.7%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
8.2%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30.1%
0.0%
41.5%
0.0%
4.4%
0.3%
20.9%
0.4%
4.6%
0.0%
28.4%
0.0%
21.9%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
7.2%
0.0%
5.2%
0.0%
21.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
10.4%
0.0%
7.7%
8.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.8%
0.0%
44.3%
0.2%
2.1%
0.7%
28.6%
0.0%
20.5%
0.0%
13.9%
0.0%
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
0.7%
22.7%
0.0%
45.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
80.0%
0.0%
21.5%
0.2%
56.7%
0.1%
Nutrition
6.8%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
7.2%
3.1%
7.4%
22.2%
0.5%
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
13.6%
11.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.7%
0.0%
7.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
5.6%
0.7%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
0.0%
3.3%
4.0%
14.9%
4.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.6%
1.1%
1.2%
4.2%
0.5%
6.3%
0.0%
1.7%
4.3%
2.8%
OT
53.8%
41.2%
63.1%
35.5%
34.6%
60.9%
57.3%
70.5%
52.0%
47.0%
49.2%
47.1%
49.5%
57.3%
31.4%
46.7%
51.0%
57.8%
64.5%
0.0%
70.6%
67.3%
60.0%
42.3%
41.0%
52.7%
66.7%
45.9%
43.6%
50.3%
55.2%
44.4%
48.9%
34.4%
45.4%
16.1%
53.6%
34.8%
46.3%
32.0%
38.8%
45.6%
45.2%
80.0%
40.5%
63.6%
31.4%
43.6%
80.5%
53.5%
53.4%
49.5%
65.4%
46.5%
58.2%
41.7%
46.2%
46.8%
48.7%
47.6%
PT
45.5%
58.8%
64.4%
52.7%
55.1%
51.1%
68.9%
63.9%
38.0%
53.0%
40.0%
44.1%
36.0%
53.6%
51.4%
40.0%
53.1%
49.7%
44.1%
0.0%
62.7%
60.2%
62.2%
39.4%
47.5%
45.2%
49.0%
42.5%
38.0%
42.5%
45.6%
52.8%
41.6%
29.7%
43.6%
53.6%
53.6%
43.6%
47.3%
52.0%
42.9%
46.7%
57.1%
30.0%
64.9%
51.3%
39.8%
60.0%
58.4%
50.5%
46.9%
62.4%
53.1%
45.8%
52.9%
45.8%
53.8%
46.9%
46.5%
46.8%
Psych
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.9%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
4.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
6.4%
0.0%
1.3%
3.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.7%
0.0%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
3.6%
3.9%
8.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
0.7%
0.0%
7.7%
0.2%
1.2%
0.6%
Social
Wk
16.9%
0.0%
15.3%
0.0%
6.4%
15.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.3%
6.2%
11.8%
8.2%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2.7%
23.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.5%
8.2%
31.4%
0.0%
7.7%
0.9%
4.1%
11.2%
8.3%
18.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
21.6%
38.7%
1.7%
4.0%
24.6%
8.2%
38.1%
0.0%
2.7%
0.6%
7.6%
19.3%
3.9%
29.5%
27.9%
0.0%
13.6%
3.5%
1.3%
14.6%
0.0%
9.8%
9.4%
9.6%
Spec
Inst
Speech
78.6%
91.0%
70.6%
55.9%
40.0%
84.7%
52.7%
90.3%
67.9%
78.2%
38.3%
82.0%
36.9%
80.6%
45.9%
85.2%
73.5%
95.0%
50.6%
96.4%
73.8%
86.2%
73.5%
80.9%
58.2%
90.6%
60.3%
77.5%
65.7%
91.4%
77.8%
88.9%
79.6%
85.7%
79.6%
79.6%
74.2%
91.4%
100.0% 100.0%
58.8%
88.2%
45.9%
82.7%
77.8%
80.0%
83.7%
82.7%
95.1%
78.7%
62.8%
87.9%
84.3%
74.5%
74.6%
89.8%
60.5%
88.1%
68.7%
90.5%
74.3%
83.1%
78.7%
77.8%
66.7%
87.4%
76.6%
85.9%
91.2%
78.9%
82.1%
76.8%
77.3%
70.1%
75.3%
92.1%
80.3%
84.7%
92.0%
76.0%
77.9%
90.3%
76.9%
87.4%
50.0%
85.7%
30.0%
80.0%
83.8%
78.4%
68.2%
83.1%
78.8%
83.4%
57.9%
88.6%
24.7%
92.2%
58.0%
88.5%
67.0%
88.1%
51.6%
92.5%
49.4%
85.2%
73.2%
85.9%
65.3%
83.2%
64.6%
85.4%
65.4%
69.2%
57.3%
72.9%
69.7%
85.5%
62.2%
77.9%
Vision
3.4%
11.8%
2.0%
0.0%
6.4%
9.8%
0.0%
6.6%
0.5%
3.6%
4.6%
1.5%
0.3%
4.8%
0.0%
2.2%
10.2%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
4.9%
4.4%
3.9%
0.9%
2.1%
3.1%
3.0%
3.7%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
10.7%
1.0%
5.2%
2.2%
4.0%
3.8%
3.8%
7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
3.0%
4.3%
5.2%
0.0%
5.1%
1.1%
7.4%
2.8%
1.0%
2.1%
3.8%
1.2%
2.5%
1.7%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/2008
(1) These data exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in Table 2 and "Multiple Service
Children" in this table will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services like service coordination or
evaluations in this time period.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
(3) Fam Cnsl/Sup. - Family Counseling, Family Support Group and Family Training services were combined into one category for this report.
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Physical
Therapy
Assistants
Physical
Therapists
Pediatricians,
Other Physicians
and Physician
Assistants
Orientation and
Mobility
Specialists
Occupational
Therapists
Licensed Practical
Nurses,
Registered
Nurses and Nurse
Practitioners
Certified
Occupational
Therapy
Assistants
Certified Low
Vision
Specialists
Audiologists
Municipality
Table 4 - Number of NYS Approved Agency and Individual Providers Under Contract with Municipalities to Provide EI Services by Service Specialty (1,2) Expressed as FTEs by Type of Discipline (3) As of December 31, 2007
Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind.
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.6 0.0
6.0 0.0
31.7
8.7
0.2 0.0
4.4 0.0
36.9 4.3
0.3 0.0
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.0 0.0
3.4 0.0
10.9
1.3
0.0 0.0
2.1 0.0
11.7 2.0
1.5 0.0
0.6 0.5
0.0 0.0
5.5 0.0
9.1 0.0
7.6
2.8
2.0 0.0
2.4 0.0
11.4 2.0
3.2 0.0
4.1 0.5
0.0 0.0
10.3 0.0
1.6 0.0
15.4
1.5
0.0 0.0
1.3 0.0
22.7 2.5
3.5 0.0
7.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.3 0.0
2.4 0.0
34.3
2.0
0.6 0.0
2.4 0.0
28.6 2.8
7.6 0.0
2.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
5.8 0.0
11.2
2.0
0.0 0.0
1.6 0.0
12.0 5.9
0.0 0.0
1.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
2.2 0.0
18.7
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
14.9 2.2
1.0 0.0
0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.7 0.1
0.8 0.0
4.2
3.9
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.0
10.4 2.9
2.2 0.0
1.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
4.0 0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
2.3 0.0
4.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
12.5 0.0
5.9 0.0
24.7
3.6
0.2 0.3
4.0 0.0
28.0 1.1
0.3 0.0
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.2 0.0
5.7 0.0
19.3
0.0
2.5 0.0
2.4 0.0
16.6 0.3
2.3 0.0
3.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.0 0.0
12.6 0.0
13.8
4.1
2.0 0.0
10.5 0.0
23.3 1.3
8.2 0.0
3.5 0.0
0.3 0.0
3.4 0.0
15.4 0.0
120.5
0.5
0.0 0.0
12.1 0.0
164.8 0.0
1.3 0.0
7.5 0.0
0.3 0.0
8.3 0.0
14.5 0.0
60.9
0.0
0.3 0.0
6.7 0.0
64.2 0.0
4.3 0.0
0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0
4.3 0.0
3.8
0.7
0.1 0.0
2.4 0.0
4.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0
17.4 0.0
7.9
0.0
0.0 0.0
4.3 0.0
5.0 0.0
1.5 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
1.1 0.0
17.1 0.0
9.2
0.8
2.7 0.0
2.9 0.0
8.7 0.5
0.6 0.0
3.0 0.1
0.0 0.0
3.9 0.0
3.9 0.0
18.4
0.0
0.3 0.0
0.4 0.0
28.5 0.0
1.7 0.0
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
12.0 0.0
9.1 0.0
25.4
2.7
0.2 0.0
3.1 0.0
27.6 2.3
1.3 0.0
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.4 0.0
1.7 0.0
4.1
0.0
0.3 0.0
1.0 0.0
3.7 0.0
0.3 0.0
2.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
9.0 0.0
15.4 0.0
21.5
2.4
2.5 0.0
2.9 1.0
19.1 1.5
3.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
6.8 0.0
1.0 0.0
15.4
1.0
2.5 0.0
1.5 0.0
27.4 0.0
1.5 0.0
1.0 0.0
2.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
8.0 0.0
2.2 0.0
13.8
1.4
2.6 0.0
1.0 0.0
15.6 1.0
4.5 0.0
1.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
28.3
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.5 0.0
18.6 0.3
0.0 0.0
5.2 0.0
0.2 0.0
9.2 0.0
2.3 0.0
39.1
0.0
2.5 0.0
1.5 0.0
32.6 0.0
3.5 0.0
4.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.8 0.0
0.5 0.0
31.6
4.4
2.0 0.1
3.1 0.0
26.9 2.2
0.7 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.2 0.0
1.3 0.0
9.2 0.0
11.8
1.7
2.7 0.0
2.9 0.0
9.2 1.8
0.4 0.0
31.6 0.0
1.9 0.5
40.0 0.0
10.9 0.0
482.3
3.0
1.8 0.0
25.7 0.0
478.3 5.0
16.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
53.1 0.0
10.6 0.0
72.8
1.3
0.3 0.0
2.2 0.0
61.9 2.3
4.0 0.0
8.0 0.0
2.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
10.0 0.0
5.9 0.0
19.8
0.0
2.5 0.0
0.7 0.0
21.6 0.0
6.0 0.0
8.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1 0.0
3.0 0.0
36.8
3.2
0.6 0.0
6.3 1.0
34.7 2.4
1.1 0.0
3.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
1.1 0.0
17.5
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
8.3 0.4
0.1 0.0
5.6 0.0
1.3 0.0
12.6 0.0
12.4 0.0
107.7
4.7
1.0 0.2
6.6 0.0
118.6 1.9
0.4 0.0
0.1 0.0
0.3 0.0
4.9 0.0
0.2 0.0
11.7
0.0
0.3 0.0
0.1 0.0
4.3 0.0
1.7 0.0
6.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
17.8 0.0
0.5 0.0
44.3
0.0
0.5 0.0
3.7 1.0
52.2 0.0
7.5 0.0
13.2 0.0
13.6 0.0
24.2
0.7
2.2 0.0
11.0 0.0
26.8 1.4
8.8 0.0
3.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.5 0.0
0.2 0.0
9.0 0.0
9.8 0.0
159.3
0.0
0.0 0.0
12.0 0.0
204.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.3 0.0
5.8 0.0
30.2
5.4
0.2 0.0
4.8 0.0
41.6 4.3
2.9 0.0
7.8 0.0
1.3 0.0
13.0 0.0
18.1 0.0
213.8
5.1
3.0 0.0
9.8 0.0
257.1 3.3
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
8.1 0.0
1.4 0.0
14.5
0.0
0.1 0.0
1.4 0.0
28.5 0.0
1.0 0.0
6.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
19.8 0.0
64.2 0.0
53.1 10.8
0.3 0.0
14.5 0.0
73.4 7.8
15.3 0.0
4.6 0.0
0.0 0.1
11.1 0.0
65.9 0.0
42.2
3.5
0.2 0.0
13.0 0.0
52.9 1.2
14.5 0.0
9.8 0.0
14.7 0.0
20.4
1.6
0.2 0.0
2.7 0.0
20.3 1.0
0.3 0.0
0.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.9 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
2.8 0.0
10.6
1.0
0.0 0.0
2.4 0.0
11.1 0.0
1.0 0.0
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.0
1.5 1.0
3.9
0.3
0.0 0.0
1.3 0.0
4.6 0.1
0.1 0.0
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.7 0.0
11.5
2.4
2.0 0.0
2.5 0.0
10.3 3.1
1.0 0.0
28.5 0.0
1.5 2.6
30.4 0.0
262.9 0.0
397.0
3.7
2.0 0.0
82.9 0.0
397.9 8.9
9.2 0.0
3.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.9 0.0
13.4 0.0
41.9
3.4
0.0 0.0
6.1 0.0
43.8 1.5
2.0 0.0
0.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.7 0.0
7.8 0.0
13.3
1.2
2.0 0.0
0.8 0.0
17.3 1.2
2.4 0.0
3.2 0.0
7.3
1.4
0.6 0.0
0.2 0.0
6.3 0.7
0.5 0.0
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.2 0.0
1.1 0.0
0.3 0.0
9.1 0.0
1.9 0.0
24.4
5.0
0.0 0.3
3.3 0.0
26.7 1.6
3.1 0.0
1.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
6.9 0.0
9.4
0.0
0.3 0.0
3.3 0.0
10.5 0.0
0.9 0.0
1.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.3 0.0
4.7 0.0
19.1
3.0
0.1 0.0
2.8 0.0
24.0 2.6
0.8 0.0
2.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
2.1 0.0
16.8
1.9
0.1 0.0
2.1 0.0
18.7 1.5
0.1 0.0
14.5 0.5
0.2 0.0
19.7 0.0
27.5 0.0
309.8
4.1
5.2 0.0
26.2 0.0
342.8 7.4
1.0 0.0
3.4 0.0
0.0 0.0
5.8 0.0
2.8 0.0
19.9
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0
31.7 1.0
3.2 0.0
8.6 0.0
16.6
2.5
0.0 0.0
2.8 0.0
11.1 1.2
0.5 0.0
2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0
40.9 0.0
2.5 0.0
61.1 0.0
56.8 0.0
794.7
0.0
5.7 0.0
50.0 0.0
827.1 0.0
16.1 0.0
109.8 1.6
3.6 3.2
193.3 0.1
503.8 1.0 1,137.9 94.8
17.5 0.5
179.6 1.0 1,210.8 82.4
82.1 0.0
139.1 1.6
5.9 3.2
236.1 0.1
542.7 1.0 1,509.8 94.8
17.5 0.5
210.8 1.0 1,580.4 82.4
97.5 0.0
Data Source: NYS EI Provider Approval database as of June 23, 2008
(1) Providers with contracts in more than one county are counted more than once.
(2) Providers with qualified personnel in more than one area of licensure, certification or registration are counted more than once.
(3) Full time equivalents and types of qualified personnel were take from provider applications for state approval.
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind.
13.1 0.0
0.1
0.0
4.9
3.1
5.2 0.2
1.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
3.0 0.0
3.6
0.5
6.7
0.0
5.5 0.0
6.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
7.6 0.0
0.7
0.0
9.3
0.4
2.7 0.0
0.1
0.0
3.0
0.3
4.1 0.0
0.0
0.0
6.2
0.0
2.4 0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
7.0 0.0
2.1
0.0
4.9
1.3
6.8 0.0
1.1
0.5
5.8
0.4
7.0 0.0
3.3
0.1
9.9
1.1
10.5 0.0
6.0
0.0
32.2
0.0
13.6 0.0
1.8
0.0
14.5
0.0
0.4 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
1.1 0.0
1.1
0.1
0.2
0.0
2.6 0.0
0.5
0.0
6.3
0.0
2.1 0.0
1.5
0.5
3.8
0.3
6.6 0.5
0.5
0.8
7.4
1.5
1.4 0.0
0.1
0.0
1.6
0.0
6.8 0.0
1.0
0.0
9.5
0.0
2.1 0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
4.5 0.0
1.0
0.0
9.4
0.0
9.5 0.0
2.0
0.0
7.4
0.5
9.1 0.0
1.0
0.0
15.1
0.0
10.2 0.2
2.0
0.5
13.4
2.1
2.9 0.0
0.4
0.0
5.9
0.0
82.6 0.0
15.6
0.0
234.9
0.0
13.4 0.0
0.8
0.0
13.0
0.0
3.0 0.0
1.0
0.0
8.6
0.0
9.3 0.0
1.1
0.0
8.0
3.8
3.9 0.0
1.6
0.0
2.9
0.0
10.8 0.0
2.4
0.5
53.0
1.8
0.5 0.0
0.0
0.5
1.8
0.0
6.8 0.0
0.0
0.0
6.8
0.0
9.8 0.5
4.3
0.0
17.2
0.8
15.8 0.0
4.1
0.0
43.0
0.0
12.0 0.0
0.1
0.0
4.1
2.1
16.5 0.4
8.1
0.0
62.0
0.0
1.9 0.0
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.0
19.4 0.0
1.4
1.0
16.1
1.8
18.5 0.0
2.7
0.0
17.9
0.5
4.3 0.0
0.1
0.0
5.8
1.0
3.4 0.0
0.0
0.0
6.2
0.5
2.4 0.0
0.6
0.0
3.7
0.0
4.2 0.0
0.0
0.0
5.2
0.5
113.9 0.0
33.5
1.0
288.8
1.5
10.2 0.0
3.0
0.0
13.5
0.0
4.0 0.0
0.1
0.0
8.6
0.2
2.7 0.0
0.1
0.0
5.0
0.9
5.5 0.0
2.2
0.0
19.0
1.5
7.2 0.0
0.8
0.0
4.7
0.0
5.2 0.0
0.5
0.0
1.3
1.0
5.1 0.0
3.2
0.0
4.5
0.0
47.9 1.5
9.5
0.0
200.8
0.8
1.4 0.0
0.5
0.5
2.3
0.3
3.6 0.0
1.2
0.0
3.3
0.0
97.1 0.0
20.5
0.0
382.9
0.0
256.6 3.3
82.1
5.0
581.3 22.8
311.3 3.3
95.3
5.0
755.5 22.8
Agency
37.9
8.3
14.2
19.9
49.3
12.7
9.1
9.9
8.1
30.4
41.5
21.1
117.7
71.3
15.5
9.0
17.1
10.0
34.7
12.0
19.2
3.3
15.2
41.7
53.2
64.3
18.6
1,075.7
73.8
18.7
65.8
24.2
307.9
8.2
39.1
33.3
310.0
38.5
372.4
7.2
43.1
30.9
18.1
8.7
13.1
7.1
930.5
36.2
19.6
14.5
44.2
24.7
22.5
29.1
579.5
12.4
17.2
1,270.8
1,892.3
2,425.9
Ind.
6.4
3.3
1.3
2.8
4.1
2.8
1.8
1.4
0.0
4.6
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
3.8
0.0
1.9
0.0
1.0
2.0
0.0
4.3
4.5
1.8
2.1
0.0
1.8
0.0
4.2
0.0
0.5
1.5
0.0
1.4
4.7
0.0
11.2
3.1
1.3
1.0
1.3
5.5
6.7
4.0
2.0
2.1
2.3
0.0
1.7
0.9
3.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
95.6
95.6
Teachers of the
Speech and
Hearing
Handicapped
Teachers of the
Deaf and Hearing
Handicapped
Teachers of the
Blind and
Partially Sighted
Speech and
Language
Pathologists and
Audiologists
Special
Education
Teachers
Social Workers
Registered
Dieticians
Psychologists
Municipality
Table 4 - Number of NYS Approved Agency and Individual Providers Under Contract with Municipalities to Provide EI Services by Service Specialty (1,2) Expressed as FTEs by Type of Discipline (3) As of December 31, 2007
Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind. Agency Ind.
51.8 18.4
1.0 1.4
5.2 0.0
19.2 2.2
15.1
2.6
0.0 0.4
0.5 0.0
1.0 0.3
13.7 13.9
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.8 4.0
38.8
6.8
0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0
3.6 1.0
76.8
5.1
0.4 0.0
4.0 0.0
10.9 0.8
14.0
6.3
0.0 0.8
0.5 0.0
1.0 0.5
24.8
7.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 1.9
0.0 1.6
9.3
5.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.2
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
70.0
3.3
2.5 0.5
0.3 0.0
15.3 0.5
60.3
1.4
0.3 0.0
4.0 0.0
1.0 0.0
17.5
3.6
0.5 0.0
0.5 0.1
3.6 1.3
102.5
0.0
0.8 0.0
0.4 0.0
13.0 0.0
138.7
0.0
1.5 0.0
1.1 0.0
15.5 0.0
10.8
3.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 0.0
1.0 0.0
8.3 0.0
7.2
0.0
1.0 0.0
10.5
3.3
2.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.5
37.1
0.0
1.2 0.0
0.9 0.0
5.5 0.0
66.3
6.4
1.5 0.4
0.3 0.0
16.7 0.9
4.9
0.3
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.3 0.3
32.4
2.5
2.1 0.0
2.0 0.0
23.0 0.5
22.1
0.5
2.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.5 0.0
19.6
1.5
2.2 0.0
0.2 0.0
8.5 0.0
86.4
2.5
1.7 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.1 0.5
85.7
0.0
2.0 0.0
4.0 0.0
18.3 0.0
104.3 13.6
3.7 1.6
0.9 0.0
11.9 0.9
12.6
2.3
2.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.1
921.6
7.5
13.6 0.0
8.6 0.3
258.8 0.7
116.4 11.1
1.7 0.1
1.9 0.0
12.4 1.9
25.3
1.5
2.0 0.0
4.0 0.0
10.3 0.5
101.8
9.7
0.9 0.4
4.7 0.0
23.5 3.0
39.7
3.8
1.1 1.0
0.0 0.0
2.4 0.3
186.8
6.6
4.1 0.6
2.2 0.0
109.2 2.8
15.0
3.4
1.2 0.0
0.9 0.0
0.5 1.0
84.3
2.2
0.4 0.0
0.8 0.0
10.8 0.5
26.9
4.1
0.8 0.0
0.8 0.0
9.6 1.1
133.8
0.0
5.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
82.0 0.0
46.0 14.0
1.0 1.0
4.3 0.0
20.3 1.5
218.3
9.1
8.1 0.5
1.8 0.5
115.3 1.5
23.4
0.0
0.2 0.0
0.2 0.0
1.2 0.0
70.5 31.2
0.8 0.0
5.2 0.0
25.8 3.8
52.8 11.2
0.8 0.5
4.0 0.0
24.2 1.9
23.9
3.8
0.8 0.0
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.5
18.3
1.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.0 1.0
8.5
1.8
0.0 0.5
0.0 0.0
0.4 0.5
23.2
8.4
1.0 0.0
0.0 0.2
2.0 1.7
724.0 26.4
38.3 0.3
3.8 0.3
291.5 7.0
55.3
2.4
0.5 0.2
0.3 0.0
4.9 0.5
26.1
4.1
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.7 2.6
8.5
9.7
0.4 0.0
4.0 0.3
2.0 1.4
69.6
7.1
2.2 0.5
0.5 0.0
16.2 1.6
19.5
0.0
0.8 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.6 0.0
36.7 11.3
0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0
13.6 0.8
46.1
5.5
2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
11.0 0.0
402.7 11.4
8.9 0.5
0.8 0.1
145.5 2.8
28.3
3.0
0.5 0.0
0.9 0.0
5.8 0.6
31.3
4.2
1.1 0.3
0.0 0.1
1.0 0.5
1,136.4
0.0
15.8 0.0
7.6 0.0
317.8 0.0
1,943.7 273.7
67.7 7.8
28.7 1.7
549.4 51.5
2,492.1 273.7
72.1 7.8
34.7 1.7
658.2 51.5
Data Source: NYS EI Provider Approval database as of June 23, 2008
(1) Providers with contracts in more than one county are counted more than once.
(2) Providers with qualified personnel in more than one area of licensure, certification or registration are counted more than once.
(3) Full time equivalents and types of qualified personnel were take from provider applications for state approval.
Table 5 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive A Single Service (1) By Type of Provider. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Single Service
Children
170
29
259
101
97
149
95
50
154
53
61
48
450
1,168
41
57
23
49
50
2
21
84
21
47
41
856
33
1,523
284
178
458
69
506
41
127
34
67
145
630
50
201
92
24
26
32
75
1,024
81
74
102
183
130
79
144
1,483
29
22
3,356
12,122
15,478
Agency
Number
48
18
118
23
31
73
70
1
135
22
59
15
450
1,168
19
57
8
45
19
0
16
84
12
19
37
699
11
1,467
198
168
458
56
374
29
111
1
64
81
583
50
68
25
2
23
26
44
949
52
45
29
130
130
16
78
1,399
21
3
3,356
9,937
13,293
Individual
Percent (2)
28.2%
62.1%
45.6%
22.8%
32.0%
49.0%
73.7%
2.0%
87.7%
41.5%
96.7%
31.3%
100.0%
100.0%
46.3%
100.0%
34.8%
91.8%
38.0%
0.0%
76.2%
100.0%
57.1%
40.4%
90.2%
81.7%
33.3%
96.3%
69.7%
94.4%
100.0%
81.2%
73.9%
70.7%
87.4%
2.9%
95.5%
55.9%
92.5%
100.0%
33.8%
27.2%
8.3%
88.5%
81.3%
58.7%
92.7%
64.2%
60.8%
28.4%
71.0%
100.0%
20.3%
54.2%
94.3%
72.4%
13.6%
100.0%
82.0%
85.9%
Number
122
11
141
78
66
76
25
49
19
31
2
33
0
0
22
0
15
4
31
2
5
0
9
28
4
157
22
56
86
10
0
13
132
12
16
33
3
64
47
0
133
67
22
3
6
31
75
29
29
73
53
0
63
66
84
8
19
0
2185
2185
Percent (2)
71.8%
37.9%
54.4%
77.2%
68.0%
51.0%
26.3%
98.0%
12.3%
58.5%
3.3%
68.8%
0.0%
0.0%
53.7%
0.0%
65.2%
8.2%
62.0%
100.0%
23.8%
0.0%
42.9%
59.6%
9.8%
18.3%
66.7%
3.7%
30.3%
5.6%
0.0%
18.8%
26.1%
29.3%
12.6%
97.1%
4.5%
44.1%
7.5%
0.0%
66.2%
72.8%
91.7%
11.5%
18.8%
41.3%
7.3%
35.8%
39.2%
71.6%
29.0%
0.0%
79.7%
45.8%
5.7%
27.6%
86.4%
0.0%
18.0%
14.1%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/2008, NYS EI Provider Approval database as of June 23, 2008
(1) Single Service Children - A child was counted as a 'single service child' if only one type of service was authorized in the reporting period. These data
exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in this table and "Multiple
Service Children" in Table 6 will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services
like service coordination or evaluations in this time period.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 6 - Number and Percent of Children Within Municipalities Authorized to Receive Multiple Services (1) By Type of Provider. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Multi Service
Children
266
34
295
93
78
133
103
61
200
83
65
68
572
1,195
35
45
49
147
93
1
51
98
45
104
61
1,054
51
2,626
337
294
804
108
859
64
227
56
97
328
1,580
100
289
182
42
10
37
154
2,088
140
77
200
294
93
81
142
2,206
48
26
28,155
18,669
46,824
Agency Only
Number
Percent (2)
41
15.4%
9
26.5%
61
20.7%
8
8.6%
4
5.1%
31
23.3%
42
40.8%
1
1.6%
169
84.5%
10
12.0%
48
73.8%
8
11.8%
572
100.0%
1,195
100.0%
11
31.4%
45
100.0%
7
14.3%
112
76.2%
4
4.3%
0
0.0%
10
19.6%
95
96.9%
6
13.3%
46
44.2%
47
77.0%
664
63.0%
6
11.8%
2,297
87.5%
213
63.2%
273
92.9%
804
100.0%
76
70.4%
372
43.3%
53
82.8%
212
93.4%
0
0.0%
74
76.3%
130
39.6%
1,348
85.3%
100
100.0%
18
6.2%
48
26.4%
1
2.4%
6
60.0%
32
86.5%
22
14.3%
1,674
80.2%
36
25.7%
39
50.6%
25
12.5%
139
47.3%
74
79.6%
7
8.6%
76
53.5%
1,842
83.5%
30
62.5%
11
42.3%
28,153
100.0%
13,284
71.2%
41,437
88.5%
Individual Only
Number
Percent (2)
106
39.8%
10
29.4%
33
11.2%
48
51.6%
32
41.0%
16
12.0%
12
11.7%
48
78.7%
0
0.0%
28
33.7%
0
0.0%
8
11.8%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
2.9%
0
0.0%
10
20.4%
0
0.0%
23
24.7%
1
100.0%
2
3.9%
0
0.0%
8
17.8%
10
9.6%
0
0.0%
35
3.3%
24
47.1%
0
0.0%
5
1.5%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
3
2.8%
36
4.2%
0
0.0%
1
0.4%
34
60.7%
0
0.0%
41
12.5%
5
0.3%
0
0.0%
128
44.3%
35
19.2%
24
57.1%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
21
13.6%
18
0.9%
23
16.4%
0
0.0%
38
19.0%
4
1.4%
0
0.0%
40
49.4%
13
9.2%
4
0.2%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
928
5.0%
928
2.0%
Individual & Agency
Number
Percent (2)
119
44.7%
15
44.1%
201
68.1%
37
39.8%
42
53.8%
86
64.7%
49
47.6%
12
19.7%
31
15.5%
45
54.2%
17
26.2%
52
76.5%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
23
65.7%
0
0.0%
32
65.3%
35
23.8%
66
71.0%
0
0.0%
39
76.5%
3
3.1%
31
68.9%
48
46.2%
14
23.0%
355
33.7%
21
41.2%
329
12.5%
119
35.3%
21
7.1%
0
0.0%
29
26.9%
451
52.5%
11
17.2%
14
6.2%
22
39.3%
23
23.7%
157
47.9%
227
14.4%
0
0.0%
143
49.5%
99
54.4%
17
40.5%
4
40.0%
5
13.5%
111
72.1%
396
19.0%
81
57.9%
38
49.4%
137
68.5%
151
51.4%
19
20.4%
34
42.0%
53
37.3%
360
16.3%
18
37.5%
15
57.7%
2
0.0%
4,457
23.9%
4,459
9.5%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/2008, NYS EI Provider Approval database as of June 23, 2008
(1) Multiple Service Children - A child was counted as a 'multiple service child' if more than one type of service was authorized in the reporting period. These data
exclude evaluations, service coordination, respite, transportation, and AT devices. The sum of "Single Service Children" in Table 5 and "Multiple Service Children" in
this table will be less than the "All Enrolled" in Table 1 because some children with IFSPs may only be authorized for excluded services like service coordination or
evaluations in this time period.
(2) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 7 - Number and Percent of Evaluators Contracted with Municipalities to Provide Evaluations Who also Provided Services to Children Whom They Evaluated. January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Number of
Evaluators (1)
82
21
49
30
40
30
25
21
7
42
12
38
7
23
14
9
8
13
47
3
20
8
18
9
13
61
28
100
16
11
23
16
11
3
18
29
9
65
71
9
113
56
23
11
9
44
146
34
35
23
60
6
38
32
41
14
18
90
1,195
1,266
Evaluators providing services to children whom they
evaluated (2)
Number
Percent
34
41.5%
11
52.4%
18
36.7%
17
56.7%
25
62.5%
14
46.7%
16
64.0%
10
47.6%
4
57.1%
17
40.5%
8
66.7%
18
47.4%
5
71.4%
18
78.3%
8
57.1%
4
44.4%
7
87.5%
9
69.2%
18
38.3%
3
100.0%
12
60.0%
6
75.0%
11
61.1%
8
88.9%
12
92.3%
40
65.6%
13
46.4%
76
76.0%
13
81.3%
9
81.8%
13
56.5%
11
68.8%
9
81.8%
3
100.0%
10
55.6%
10
34.5%
6
66.7%
34
52.3%
40
56.3%
7
77.8%
53
46.9%
26
46.4%
12
52.2%
7
63.6%
6
66.7%
16
36.4%
74
50.7%
13
38.2%
17
48.6%
12
52.2%
31
51.7%
6
100.0%
19
50.0%
23
71.9%
32
78.0%
9
64.3%
9
50.0%
81
90.0%
554
46.4%
616
48.7%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of March 31, 2008, NYS Provider Approval database June 23, 2008
(1) Evaluators are providers approved by NYSDOH and under contract with that municipality to provide evaluation services. A
provider may contract with more than one municipality.
(2) Evaluators who provided general services between 1/1/07 and 12/31/07 to a child from any municipalty whom they had
evaluated at any time.
Table 8 - Number and Percent of Children Whose Families Were Authorized to Receive Supportive Services. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Total
Children (1)
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Number
460
66
578
196
227
287
204
112
357
144
130
120
1,057
2,467
77
103
75
198
145
3
73
189
67
152
102
1,931
84
4,264
663
477
1,280
178
1,415
112
363
91
168
487
2,236
151
498
280
70
40
72
237
3,236
229
152
321
483
224
162
289
3,854
82
51
34,419
31,769
66,188
Received Supportive
Service (2)
Percent
36
21
74
9
7
1
3
2
15
13
5
16
228
195
2
0
4
26
8
0
0
15
5
0
8
275
0
825
156
24
210
31
263
17
27
13
12
34
336
17
47
24
10
0
5
42
954
11
25
46
55
2
5
36
526
22
1
22,599
4,744
27,343
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of March 31, 2008
(1) Total Children - Children were included if they were enrolled in EI at any time during the period, regardless of the length of time.
(2) Supportive Services - Family Counseling, Family Support Group, Family Training, and Respite services.
7.8%
31.8%
12.8%
4.6%
3.1%
0.3%
1.5%
1.8%
4.2%
9.0%
3.8%
13.3%
21.6%
7.9%
2.6%
0.0%
5.3%
13.1%
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
7.9%
7.5%
0.0%
7.8%
14.2%
0.0%
19.3%
23.5%
5.0%
16.4%
17.4%
18.6%
15.2%
7.4%
14.3%
7.1%
7.0%
15.0%
11.3%
9.4%
8.6%
14.3%
0.0%
6.9%
17.7%
29.5%
4.8%
16.4%
14.3%
11.4%
0.9%
3.1%
12.5%
13.6%
26.8%
2.0%
65.7%
14.9%
41.3%
Table 9 - Number and Percent Of Children Within Municipalities with Sources of Third Party Reimbursement (Medicaid and Commercial Insurance). January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Enrolled in EI
(1)
460
66
578
196
227
287
204
112
357
144
130
120
1,057
2,467
77
103
75
198
145
3
73
189
67
152
102
1,931
84
4,264
663
477
1,280
178
1,415
112
363
91
168
487
2,236
151
498
280
70
40
72
237
3,236
229
152
321
483
224
162
289
3,854
82
51
34,419
31,769
66,188
Medicaid Only (2,4)
Number
150
27
262
91
119
149
117
72
170
64
63
57
183
869
36
57
44
73
61
1
48
65
29
54
48
647
39
643
211
225
459
53
300
59
194
42
11
196
72
93
98
130
27
15
34
122
549
65
56
124
75
72
59
75
993
23
29
19,927
8,699
28,626
Percent
32.6%
40.9%
45.3%
46.4%
52.4%
51.9%
57.4%
64.3%
47.6%
44.4%
48.5%
47.5%
17.3%
35.2%
46.8%
55.3%
58.7%
36.9%
42.1%
33.3%
65.8%
34.4%
43.3%
35.5%
47.1%
33.5%
46.4%
15.1%
31.8%
47.2%
35.9%
29.8%
21.2%
52.7%
53.4%
46.2%
6.5%
40.2%
3.2%
61.6%
19.7%
46.4%
38.6%
37.5%
47.2%
51.5%
17.0%
28.4%
36.8%
38.6%
15.5%
32.1%
36.4%
26.0%
25.8%
28.0%
56.9%
57.9%
27.4%
43.3%
Commercial Insurance Only
(3,4)
Number
Percent
261
56.7%
23
34.8%
245
42.4%
76
38.8%
92
40.5%
74
25.8%
61
29.9%
22
19.6%
154
43.1%
71
49.3%
53
40.8%
41
34.2%
758
71.7%
1,361
55.2%
29
37.7%
36
35.0%
20
26.7%
99
50.0%
67
46.2%
1
33.3%
21
28.8%
100
52.9%
28
41.8%
84
55.3%
47
46.1%
1127
58.4%
25
29.8%
3,449
80.9%
389
58.7%
201
42.1%
683
53.4%
95
53.4%
873
61.7%
39
34.8%
138
38.0%
29
31.9%
148
88.1%
257
52.8%
1,164
52.1%
43
28.5%
304
61.0%
118
42.1%
34
48.6%
11
27.5%
32
44.4%
90
38.0%
2,477
76.5%
94
41.0%
77
50.7%
174
54.2%
258
53.4%
119
53.1%
70
43.2%
161
55.7%
2,692
69.9%
47
57.3%
16
31.4%
8,677
25.2%
19,258
60.6%
27,935
42.2%
Both (4)
Number
18
12
42
19
15
56
23
8
27
8
12
12
82
232
5
7
5
18
11
0
3
18
6
11
6
117
16
146
42
21
82
17
161
13
4
20
8
14
954
9
51
24
9
1
5
19
131
64
17
18
116
23
19
32
136
10
1
1,178
2,956
4,134
Percent
3.9%
18.2%
7.3%
9.7%
6.6%
19.5%
11.3%
7.1%
7.6%
5.6%
9.2%
10.0%
7.8%
9.4%
6.5%
6.8%
6.7%
9.1%
7.6%
0.0%
4.1%
9.5%
9.0%
7.2%
5.9%
6.1%
19.0%
3.4%
6.3%
4.4%
6.4%
9.6%
11.4%
11.6%
1.1%
22.0%
4.8%
2.9%
42.7%
6.0%
10.2%
8.6%
12.9%
2.5%
6.9%
8.0%
4.0%
27.9%
11.2%
5.6%
24.0%
10.3%
11.7%
11.1%
3.5%
12.2%
2.0%
3.4%
9.3%
6.2%
Unknown (4)
Number
31
4
29
10
1
8
3
10
6
1
2
10
34
5
7
3
6
8
6
1
1
6
4
3
1
40
4
26
21
30
56
13
81
1
27
0
1
20
46
6
45
8
0
13
1
6
79
6
2
5
34
10
14
21
33
2
5
4,637
856
5,493
Percent
6.7%
6.1%
5.0%
5.1%
0.4%
2.8%
1.5%
8.9%
1.7%
0.7%
1.5%
8.3%
3.2%
0.2%
9.1%
2.9%
8.0%
4.0%
4.1%
33.3%
1.4%
3.2%
6.0%
2.0%
1.0%
2.1%
4.8%
0.6%
3.2%
6.3%
4.4%
7.3%
5.7%
0.9%
7.4%
0.0%
0.6%
4.1%
2.1%
4.0%
9.0%
2.9%
0.0%
32.5%
1.4%
2.5%
2.4%
2.6%
1.3%
1.6%
7.0%
4.5%
8.6%
7.3%
0.9%
2.4%
9.8%
13.5%
2.7%
8.3%
Data Source: KIDS data complete as of March 31, 2008
(1) Enrolled in EI - Children were included if they were enrolled in EI at any time during the period, regardless of the length of time.
(2) Medicaid - Children were counted as having Medicaid if the "Medicaid" field in KIDS was equal to 'Yes'.
(3) Commercial Insurance - Children were counted as having insurance if there was an insurance record present for the child in KIDS. This includes both insurance companies that are
regulated by NYS and those that are not. It is estimated that 27.9% of the children enrolled in EI are covered by an insurance company regulated by NYS.
(4) Sum of percents may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Table 10 - Number and Percent of Claims Submitted to Commercial Insurers And Percent of Claims Denied by Insurers. January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007
Claims
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess (1)
Erie (0)
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee (1)
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe (1)
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara (1)
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans(1)
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk(1)
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne (1)
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City (1)
ROS
STATE
Submitted
16,718
1,405
13,614
5,008
4,371
8,643
6,707
2,041
10,139
5,133
4,474
2,777
11,710
64,627
1,135
1,557
1,597
4,235
4,897
60
3,329
6,119
1,722
5,893
3,892
42,227
2,601
269,205
17,317
11,631
42,942
9,894
77,087
1,399
6,776
1,555
8,221
16,127
167,536
2,142
22,316
8,309
2,405
494
2,658
5,288
134,533
7,559
4,687
11,261
21,603
12,925
6,288
7,370
233,493
3,497
745
390,273
1,353,894
1,744,167
Reconciled (2)
16,771
1,676
12,608
4,059
5,400
9,137
1,692
2,071
10,433
4,595
4,194
3,551
10,991
57,401
1,379
1,563
1,636
4,210
4,893
90
3,667
6,350
1,855
5,895
4,099
42,152
2,356
268,656
17,259
11,475
45,164
9,925
73,038
1,335
6,838
1,621
8,532
5,589
163,182
2,564
21,802
5,699
2,354
317
2,440
5,668
131,241
6,186
4,555
9,845
20,483
14,064
6,546
7,369
230,014
3,524
783
390,273
1,312,792
1,703,065
Denied
13,569
1,194
7,209
3,415
3,956
6,204
1,355
701
7,568
3,535
3,108
2,900
7,344
38,407
898
744
1,396
3,363
3,936
90
2,656
5,510
1,336
3,435
2,407
33,509
2,008
212,586
13,750
5,731
35,243
8,222
57,761
1,054
6,056
1,093
8,096
3,649
143,624
1,822
19,634
5,346
1,701
279
2,028
4,793
91,822
4,761
2,597
5,593
17,964
12,480
5,111
6,405
199,716
2,856
702
317,473
1,044,228
1,361,701
Percent Denied /
Reconciled (3)
80.9%
71.2%
57.2%
84.1%
73.3%
67.9%
80.1%
33.8%
72.5%
76.9%
74.1%
81.7%
66.8%
66.9%
65.1%
47.6%
85.3%
79.9%
80.4%
100.0%
72.4%
86.8%
72.0%
58.3%
58.7%
79.5%
85.2%
79.1%
79.7%
49.9%
78.0%
82.8%
79.1%
79.0%
88.6%
67.4%
94.9%
65.3%
88.0%
71.1%
90.1%
93.8%
72.3%
88.0%
83.1%
84.6%
70.0%
77.0%
57.0%
56.8%
87.7%
88.7%
78.1%
86.9%
86.8%
81.0%
89.7%
81.3%
79.5%
80.0%
Data Sources: KIDS data complete as of 12/07. Municipal Fiscal Agent Reports submitted 2/08.
(0) These counties submitted Fiscal Agent Reports last year
(1) Data from these counties were submitted by fiscal agents via a special report. NYS Department of Health is unable to verify the accuracy of those fiscal
agent reports. All other data were collected and submitted by counties using KIDS.
(2) Claims Reconciled - These are claims submitted to insurers that were subsequently denied, paid, or partially paid between January 1, 2007 and
December 31, 2007. Reconcilation data from fiscal agents include only claims submitted in the reporting period. Reconcilation data from KIDS include claims
reconciled during the period, regardless of when they were submitted. The number of claims submitted may not equal the number reconciled since some
reconciled claims were submitted prior to January 1.
(3) Percent Denied/Reconciled - Number of claims denied divided by claims reconciled in reporting period.
Table 11 - Reasons for Commercial Insurers' Denial of Early Intervention Claims by Number and Percent of Denials. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess (1)
Erie (0)
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee (1)
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe (1)
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara (1)
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans(1)
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk (1)
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne (1)
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City (1)
Rest of State
New York State
Claims
Denied In
Reporting
Period (2)
Reasons For Denial
Service Not
Covered
13,569
4,239
1,194
233
7,209
1,542
3,415
1,140
3,956
1,232
6,204
2,134
1,355
1,124
701
168
7,568
252
3,535
2,587
3,108
1,551
2,900
438
7,344
1,307
38,407
1,158
898
173
744
106
1,396
139
3,363
58
3,936
275
90
48
2,656
756
5,510
824
1,336
44
3,435
2,211
2,407
329
33,509
1,713
2,008
979
212,586 28,210
13,750
149
5,731
2,542
35,243
3,801
8,222
1,625
57,761 12,625
1,054
95
6,056
2,130
1,093
89
8,096
1,953
3,649
421
143,624
8,738
1,822
298
19,634
5,917
5,346
733
1,701
1,248
279
0
2,028
785
4,793
1,006
91,822 22,157
4,761
233
2,597
1,049
5,593
2,206
17,964
2,038
12,480
4,437
5,111
781
6,405
513
199,716 40,049
2,856
87
702
185
317,473 22,267
1,044,228 172,860
1,361,701 195,127
No Response
From Insurer
33.3%
3
19.5%
56
21.4%
196
45.9%
0
32.5%
0
35.0%
26
85.2%
0
47.1%
0
6.3%
20
75.6%
0
51.4%
0
15.8%
1
17.8%
327
3.0%
37
25.9%
6
15.7%
0
10.0%
0
1.7%
6
0
7.0%
53.3%
0
28.5%
576
35.5%
287
12.9%
0
65.9%
0
27.0%
0
5.1%
61
50.7%
64
14.8%
285
1.1%
73
52.3%
0
16.7%
0
20.9%
0
22.7%
1,994
9.0%
0
74.4%
234
18.4%
58
28.1%
798
13.5%
0
6.2%
35
21.6%
88
36.8%
0
45.8%
24
76.1%
4
0.0%
0
40.0%
7
25.0%
80
24.1% 23,854
6.6%
1
44.6%
3
47.3%
123
11.5%
0
35.9%
281
15.4%
368
8.0%
0
29.7%
1,621
9.1%
0
29.5%
0
7.0% 221,884
19.1% 31,597
15.9% 253,481
0.0%
4.7%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
0.1%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
21.7%
12.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
3.3%
0.1%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
8.2%
12.0%
11.5%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
0.0%
1.5%
0.2%
0.0%
0.4%
2.0%
26.0%
0.0%
0.1%
2.6%
0.0%
2.3%
7.3%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
69.9%
3.5%
20.7%
Other Denial
1,133
586
1,455
2
122
172
151
105
360
117
70
197
951
2,294
214
128
95
92
10
0
173
137
105
128
224
602
35
9,834
157
193
2,214
183
12,068
44
129
46
374
341
7,823
73
273
258
84
0
55
211
16,578
1,463
352
1,240
1,131
456
31
146
6,515
205
84
7,503
72,219
79,722
8.9%
49.1%
20.2%
0.1%
3.2%
2.8%
11.4%
29.4%
8.9%
3.4%
2.3%
7.1%
12.9%
6.0%
32.0%
18.9%
6.8%
2.7%
0.3%
0.0%
6.5%
5.9%
30.8%
3.8%
18.4%
1.8%
1.8%
5.2%
1.1%
4.0%
9.7%
2.4%
21.7%
4.2%
4.5%
9.5%
5.4%
10.9%
5.6%
5.3%
1.7%
16.1%
5.1%
0.0%
2.8%
5.2%
18.1%
41.6%
15.0%
26.6%
6.4%
3.7%
0.6%
2.3%
4.8%
21.5%
13.4%
2.4%
8.0%
6.5%
Not Medically
Necessary
Out-of-Network
Provider
313
0
133
17
59
0
0
0
398
3
7
320
843
12
0
0
0
393
12
0
24
27
0
128
91
18,186
0
19,249
34
353
433
3,239
3,659
273
29
28
35
221
221
3
2,593
0
18
0
86
26
14
24
15
43
456
92
6
3,854
3,182
0
0
26,583
59,152
85,735
5,190
91
1,318
554
1,567
2,287
30
81
1,792
576
1,136
1,000
958
10,816
199
356
1,142
644
3,232
0
209
679
105
239
0
73
343
120,107
7,056
1,150
11,859
1,710
10,716
421
143
63
2,668
877
120,237
865
4,830
307
249
0
831
2,216
6,668
1,044
753
435
8,727
1,522
1,658
32
60,999
65
306
6,716
403,131
409,847
2.5%
0.0%
1.8%
0.7%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.9%
0.1%
0.2%
11.5%
11.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.7%
0.3%
0.0%
0.9%
1.2%
0.0%
3.8%
7.5%
54.3%
0.0%
10.1%
0.2%
7.3%
1.9%
41.6%
6.6%
25.9%
1.0%
5.8%
0.5%
7.1%
0.2%
0.2%
16.1%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
4.4%
0.6%
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
0.9%
2.6%
0.7%
0.1%
60.2%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
8.4%
6.5%
7.0%
40.7%
7.6%
18.3%
22.3%
41.4%
37.5%
2.3%
22.7%
44.5%
16.8%
37.7%
36.0%
13.0%
28.4%
29.7%
52.6%
81.9%
19.1%
82.3%
0.0%
7.9%
29.2%
30.8%
7.1%
0.0%
0.2%
17.8%
63.2%
51.3%
23.6%
52.2%
22.0%
19.3%
39.9%
5.0%
13.0%
38.3%
28.1%
85.4%
62.8%
30.1%
19.2%
15.2%
0.0%
42.3%
55.1%
7.3%
29.7%
32.0%
9.3%
49.2%
12.3%
32.8%
0.5%
45.3%
6.8%
48.7%
2.1%
44.5%
33.5%
No Preauthorization Obtained
(3)
318
2
817
620
350
3
1
2
0
2
67
57
1,481
957
0
0
0
0
0
18
214
30
2
21
0
119
292
4,301
93
164
1,022
0
6,806
0
119
0
77
96
1,146
6
1,198
45
0
0
8
1
14,284
158
12
24
3,740
4,255
1,470
11
219
0
7
2,194
44,635
46,829
2.5%
0.2%
11.3%
25.0%
9.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.6%
0.0%
0.1%
2.2%
2.1%
20.2%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
8.1%
1.3%
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.4%
15.1%
2.3%
0.7%
3.4%
4.5%
0.0%
12.2%
0.0%
4.2%
0.0%
1.1%
3.1%
0.8%
0.4%
7.5%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
15.6%
4.5%
0.5%
0.5%
21.1%
34.4%
29.1%
0.2%
0.2%
0.0%
1.1%
0.7%
4.9%
3.8%
Data Sources: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/08. Municipal Fiscal Agent Reports submitted 2/08.
(0) These counties submitted Fiscal Agent Reports last year
(1) Data from these counties were submitted by fiscal agents via a special report. NYS Department of Health is unable to verify the accuracy of
those fiscal agent reports. All other data were collected and submitted by counties using KIDS.
(2) 137,883 claims were excluded because the reason for denial was not recorded.
(3) Data reported in this column include both denials by insurers when municipalities sought preauthorization, and denials when preauthorization
was not sought.
Table 11 - Reasons for Commercial Insurers' Denial of Early Intervention Claims by Number and Percent of Denials. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Reasons For Denial
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess (1)
Erie (0)
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee (1)
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe (1)
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara (1)
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans(1)
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk (1)
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne (1)
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City (1)
Rest of State
New York State
Exceeds Insurer's
Benefits Exhausted
Claiming Limit
1,215
186
173
112
0
1,103
13
0
415
31
98
108
378
20,830
0
64
19
135
87
0
0
7
18
481
45
8,166
117
2,055
1,433
306
582
704
1,892
134
0
0
0
411
740
0
396
167
28
0
44
0
2,455
51
16
55
21
373
449
1,148
8,302
526
0
1,234
56,089
57,323
9.5%
15.6%
2.4%
4.5%
0.0%
18.1%
1.0%
0.0%
10.3%
0.9%
3.2%
3.9%
5.1%
54.7%
0.0%
9.5%
1.4%
4.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
5.3%
14.3%
3.7%
24.4%
6.1%
1.1%
10.4%
6.3%
2.6%
9.1%
3.4%
12.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.2%
0.5%
0.0%
2.5%
10.4%
1.7%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2.7%
1.4%
0.7%
1.2%
0.1%
3.0%
8.9%
17.9%
6.2%
55.2%
0.0%
0.4%
6.2%
4.7%
0
3
384
2
126
287
1
0
531
21
12
195
153
1,117
53
0
0
1,998
0
0
41
96
45
39
422
3,648
0
1,398
4,255
56
1,768
261
2,564
72
48
74
416
413
1,549
4
29
10
0
150
69
110
1,550
228
8
192
391
450
74
478
7,181
42
0
6,089
33,014
39,103
0.0%
0.3%
5.3%
0.1%
3.3%
4.7%
0.1%
0.0%
13.2%
0.6%
0.4%
7.0%
2.1%
2.9%
7.9%
0.0%
0.0%
59.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
4.1%
13.2%
1.2%
34.7%
10.9%
0.0%
0.7%
30.9%
1.2%
7.8%
3.4%
4.6%
6.8%
1.7%
15.3%
6.0%
13.2%
1.1%
0.3%
0.2%
0.6%
0.0%
96.2%
3.5%
2.7%
1.7%
6.5%
0.3%
4.1%
2.2%
3.6%
1.5%
7.5%
5.3%
4.4%
0.0%
1.9%
3.6%
3.2%
Child Not Covered
162
37
962
21
323
83
0
1
154
15
71
62
372
864
24
23
0
32
0
24
663
132
22
110
27
647
79
4,111
243
84
643
56
2,913
0
20
5
441
344
229
40
729
56
10
0
30
95
4,260
229
72
249
1,183
506
222
154
2,817
28
46
12,586
24,725
37,311
1.3%
3.1%
13.3%
0.8%
8.5%
1.4%
0.0%
0.3%
3.8%
0.4%
2.4%
2.2%
5.1%
2.3%
3.6%
3.4%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
26.7%
25.0%
5.7%
6.5%
3.3%
2.2%
1.9%
4.1%
2.2%
1.8%
1.7%
2.8%
0.7%
5.2%
0.0%
0.7%
1.0%
6.3%
11.0%
0.2%
2.9%
4.5%
3.5%
0.6%
0.0%
1.5%
2.4%
4.6%
6.5%
3.1%
5.3%
6.7%
4.1%
4.4%
2.4%
2.1%
2.9%
7.3%
4.0%
2.7%
3.0%
No Primary Care
Physician Referral
164
0
229
10
9
0
0
0
90
3
0
2
348
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
103
0
0
0
294
0
482
257
0
393
0
394
15
7
121
199
0
19
0
0
0
0
6
0
277
0
2
73
97
45
0
0
69
3,773
0
0
1,109
7,486
8,595
1.3%
0.0%
3.2%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
4.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.3%
1.9%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.7%
1.4%
0.2%
25.0%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
6.9%
0.0%
0.1%
3.1%
2.1%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.8%
0.7%
Technical Error
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
13
0
5
1
226
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
35
0
16
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,067
377
9,444
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
0.8%
Government
Service Blanket
Rejection
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
66
0
395
0
0
0
0
0
0
312
0
0
0
0
0
79
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
92
0
0
0
0
0
2
88
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
241
1,060
1,301
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
14.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Data Sources: KIDS data complete as of 3/31/08. Municipal Fiscal Agent Reports submitted 2/08.
(0) These counties submitted Fiscal Agent Reports last year
(1) Data from these counties were submitted via a special report created to capture data from fiscal agents. All other data were collected and
submitted by counties using KIDS.
(2) 137,883 claims were excluded because the reason for denial was not recorded.
(3) Data reported in this column include both denials by insurers when municipalities sought preauthorization, and denials when preauthorization
was not sought.
Table 12 - Number and Amount of Claims Submitted By Municipalities to Medicaid By Payment Status. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Claims
Submitted
19,943
2,732
21,875
5,265
7,529
18,354
6,915
6,245
20,461
4,509
5,200
5,269
22,544
91,903
2,404
3,033
3,613
8,571
9,873
163
203
5,348
1,465
4,564
4,709
74,495
4,718
84,078
24,735
19,884
55,370
9,241
42,811
5,083
12,296
3,195
4,471
21,469
108,019
6,654
20,820
19,084
3,991
909
4,119
16,077
61,712
7,270
4,453
11,170
13,876
10,636
9,911
10,256
147,180
3,265
1,719
4,194,459
1,105,657
5,300,116
Data Source: OMM/DOIT, report received 5/8/08
Claims
18,687
2,480
19,920
5,017
7,067
14,480
6,728
5,578
19,372
4,188
5,130
4,985
19,998
84,292
2,090
2,830
3,210
8,105
5,726
161
188
5,027
1,332
3,954
4,507
60,824
4,251
68,319
22,916
19,510
45,840
7,126
34,699
4,533
11,013
2,879
1,862
19,581
96,895
6,298
13,702
15,146
2,859
821
3,252
9,724
49,136
5,597
4,212
10,089
13482
6,373
4,728
9,509
127,685
2,725
1,673
2,360,548
942,311
3,302,859
Claims Paid
Amount
Percent
93.7%
$1,141,531.00
90.8%
$190,131.95
91.1%
$1,303,726.03
95.3%
$315,218.78
93.9%
$421,455.70
78.9%
$908,203.04
97.3%
$445,060.34
89.3%
$436,465.71
94.7%
$1,276,093.76
92.9%
$269,226.00
98.7%
$264,312.15
94.6%
$361,114.78
88.7%
$1,262,456.02
91.7%
$4,739,606.99
86.9%
$131,271.04
93.3%
$165,807.01
88.8%
$215,113.00
94.6%
$574,209.47
58.0%
$388,883.00
98.8%
$10,310.25
92.6%
$11,671.30
94.0%
$287,125.08
90.9%
$37,067.50
86.6%
$220,885.27
95.7%
$272,706.55
81.6%
$4,168,317.05
90.1%
$269,995.00
81.3%
$5,917,533.37
92.6%
$1,315,057.40
98.1%
$1,156,737.70
82.8%
$2,686,531.95
77.1%
$404,942.86
81.1%
$2,513,399.28
$306,194.87
89.2%
89.6%
$722,140.10
90.1%
$179,903.97
41.6%
$129,956.00
91.2%
$1,202,934.41
89.7%
$7,652,564.54
94.6%
$407,219.90
65.8%
$867,033.00
79.4%
$808,868.44
71.6%
$182,106.81
90.3%
$55,659.50
79.0%
$166,352.34
60.5%
$651,818.00
79.6%
$4,241,632.97
77.0%
$431,495.94
94.6%
$273,308.63
90.3%
$594,696.98
97.2%
$980,119.30
59.9%
$373,787.90
47.7%
$301,616.11
92.7%
$635,003.65
86.8%
$7,925,434.63
83.5%
$171,412.09
97.3%
$102,296.00
56.3% $196,463,782.63
85.2%
$63,445,722.41
62.3% $259,909,505.04
Claims
1,256
252
1,955
248
462
3,874
187
667
1,089
321
70
284
2,546
7,611
314
203
403
466
4,147
2
15
321
133
610
202
13,671
467
15,759
1,819
374
9,530
2,115
8,112
550
1,283
316
2,609
1,888
11,124
356
7,118
3,938
1,132
88
867
6,353
12,576
1,673
241
1,081
394
4,263
5,183
747
19,495
540
46
1,833,911
163,346
1,997,257
Claims Denied
Percent
Amount
6.3%
$69,196.00
9.2%
$22,169.00
8.9%
$113,984.00
4.7%
$13,599.00
6.1%
$21,340.00
21.1%
$303,872.00
2.7%
$12,056.25
10.7%
$35,794.50
5.3%
$55,205.00
7.1%
$17,171.00
1.3%
$3,221.00
5.4%
$19,350.50
11.3%
$142,806.00
8.3%
$401,739.00
13.1%
$17,864.50
6.7%
$12,898.00
11.2%
$25,697.00
5.4%
$36,844.75
42.0%
$182,578.00
1.2%
$71.25
7.4%
$753.25
6.0%
$15,221.25
9.1%
$3,355.00
13.4%
$35,272.25
4.3%
$7,289.50
18.4%
$850,608.50
9.9%
$29,147.00
18.7%
$1,376,300.00
7.4%
$129,947.00
1.9%
$19,408.75
17.2%
$563,870.25
22.9%
$121,426.50
18.9%
$513,065.50
10.8%
$37,006.00
10.4%
$76,518.75
9.9%
$18,361.50
58.4%
$182,501.00
8.8%
$93,537.00
10.3%
$833,411.00
5.4%
$20,288.75
34.2%
$438,530.00
20.6%
$198,267.00
28.4%
$72,514.00
9.7%
$6,160.00
21.0%
$40,280.00
39.5%
$406,715.50
20.4%
$1,014,289.00
23.0%
$116,303.75
5.4%
$13,909.00
9.7%
$62,306.00
2.8%
$25,299.25
40.1%
$242,182.75
52.3%
$253,365.00
7.3%
$39,624.50
13.2%
$1,114,561.00
16.5%
$31,462.25
2.7%
$1,838.00
43.7% $141,393,123.00
14.8%
$10,512,352.50
37.7% $151,905,475.50
Table 13 - Number of Claims Submitted By Municipalities and Denied by Medicaid By Reason for Denial. January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Municipality
Albany
Allegany
Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Rensselaer
Rockland
St. Lawrence
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
Steuben
Suffolk
Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
New York City
Rest of State
New York State
Total
Denials
1,256
252
1,955
248
462
3,874
187
667
1,089
321
70
284
2,546
7,611
314
203
403
466
4,147
2
15
321
133
610
202
13,671
467
15,759
1,819
374
9,530
2,115
8,112
550
1,283
316
2,609
1,888
11,124
356
7,118
3,938
1,132
88
867
6,353
12,576
1,673
241
1,081
394
4,263
5,183
747
19,495
540
46
1,833,911
163,346
1,997,257
Recipient
Ineligible On
Service Date
Third Party
Indicated/
Other
Insurance
Amt Not
Submitted
967
32
1,562
194
291
2,028
64
357
677
251
61
251
1,980
7,005
255
142
162
442
986
2
8
230
133
400
53
8,174
327
13,713
1,307
283
2,890
1,176
5,167
121
1,100
221
874
900
10,366
239
2,218
3,059
87
86
416
835
8,846
1,074
169
1,009
239
1,956
1,645
560
15,160
497
2
925,386
103,249
1,028,635
Data Source: OMM/DOIT, report received 5/8/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
457,261
36
457,297
Duplicate
Claim In
History
11
98
13
9
2
1,818
61
7
1
4
1
0
24
14
5
53
198
16
2,041
0
3
0
0
115
0
2,845
14
1,665
342
12
5,840
812
1,133
377
59
28
1,594
0
398
1
3,841
21
1,028
2
422
5,179
1,764
4
4
23
11
2,252
1,887
157
2,069
1
0
175,689
38,279
213,968
Recipient
Not On
Restricted
Recipient
File
64
6
54
38
21
0
6
132
160
54
0
3
311
103
0
0
25
4
667
0
2
28
0
0
67
1,611
104
145
23
15
129
5
948
10
13
2
60
516
145
69
398
402
0
0
0
68
1,409
83
47
15
12
54
1,324
6
1,128
16
16
194,330
10,518
204,848
Recipient
Not
Recipient
Authorized
Sex or Birth
For
Date Not
Restricted
Equal File
Program On
Service Date
5
0
16
0
45
19
24
61
70
0
0
10
3
74
27
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
350
0
56
71
28
19
12
72
0
41
0
11
275
67
3
484
114
7
0
11
0
180
348
16
0
102
0
74
2
206
7
5
55,561
2,924
58,485
188
31
246
6
102
9
26
77
172
10
6
20
166
290
8
6
12
4
315
0
1
49
0
11
64
554
22
84
72
9
313
17
376
42
36
52
46
84
137
41
116
191
10
0
16
149
131
123
5
8
11
1
142
17
686
19
23
7,465
5,352
12,817
Recipient
Coverage
Claim
Indicates
Recipient
Provider Not
Capitation Recipient ID
Age Invalid
Equal
Claims And Number Not
For Early
Restriction
Prepaid
On File
Intervention
Recipient
Capitation
Claim
File Provider
Plan Refer
Service Only
0
3
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
54
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
71
0
33
0
0
0
0
37
0
101
0
29
2
0
0
1
0
38
52
0
0
0
0
86
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
0
0
9,334
614
9,948
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
79
7
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,707
132
7,839
21
47
20
1
1
0
6
33
9
2
0
0
48
50
19
0
6
0
138
0
1
14
0
5
15
93
0
27
3
27
302
14
305
0
3
4
24
111
9
0
20
96
0
0
2
122
51
34
0
26
19
0
111
5
192
0
0
466
2,036
2,502
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
414
0
414
Other
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
11
0
32
1
0
0
0
3
0
2
6
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
109
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
298
206
504