Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics Impact of the Expansion and Annexation Wall on the Socioeconomic Conditions of Palestinian Households in the Localities in which the Wall Passes Through (July, 2004) Press Conference on the Survey Results October, 2004 October, 2004 All Rights Reserved Suggested Citation: Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, 2004. Impact of the Expansion and Annexation Wall on the Socioeconomic Conditions of Palestinian Households in the Localities in which the Wall Passes Through; July, 2004. Ramallah, Palestine. All correspondence should be directed to: The Dissemination and Documentation Department /Division of User Services Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics P.O.Box 1647 Ramallah, Palestine. Tel: (972/970) 2 2406340 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (972/970) 2 2406343 Web-site: http://www.pcbs.org Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics Impact of the Expansion and Annexation Wall on the Socioeconomic Conditions of Palestinian Households in the Localities in which the Wall Passes Through, July 2004 Contents 1. Press Release 2. Tables Notice to users of this report: All Statistical information presented in this report are based or a reported data by the households of the localities, which the Expansion and Annexation Wall passed through. The survey covers the households in the localities which the separation wall passed through, till the date of data collection. PCBS warns against using the statistical information related to the area of confiscated land. Respondents usually intend to report incomplete information about the area of confiscated land. (-) means that there are no enough observations in the cell. Press Release On the Main Findings of the Survey on the Impact of the Expansion and Annexation Wall on the Social and Economical Conditions of the Palestinian Households in the Localities which the Wall Passe Through (July 2004) The Expansion and Annexation Wall Impelled 31% of the Population at the Localities Affected By the Wall to Think about Changing Their Place of Residence, and 80.7% of the Households Living West of the Wall Have Been Separated From the Basic Medical Services, and 86.0% of the Confiscated Land Was Used For Agriculture, and the Wall Influenced the Social Relationships for 90.7% of the Households Living West of the Wall. PCBS conducted a household survey in the Palestinian localities where the Expansion and Annexation wall passes through. The sample size was 3,615 households, while the sample size for completed questionnaires was 2,689 households, of which 293 located west of the Expansion and Annexation wall and 2,396 east of the wall. Data collection took place during July 2004 This survey comes as a part of the surveillance system to monitor the impact of the Israeli measures on the well being of the Palestinian people. The effect of the Expansion and Annexation Wall and the Security Situation on the education: The results revealed that 3.4% of the individuals in the localities affected by the wall left their education due to the security situation and the expansion and annexation wall, (5.3% west of the wall and 3.1% east of the wall), while it’s noticed that 26.0% of the individuals in the affected localities left their education due to the bad economic conditions, (31.7% west of the wall and 25.2% east of the wall). The results show that 81.5% of Palestinian households in the localities affected by the wall that have some members attending higher education used detour roads in order to reach their universities and colleges as a method of adaptation with the difficulties they face, (81.1% west of the wall and 81.6% east of the wall), 81.0% of the households were forced to be absent from university and college due to the closure (77.9% west of the wall and 81.6% east of the wall). Changing place of residence or thinking of change: The results revealed that the percentage of the individuals living west of the wall in the north of the West Bank who changed their place of residence was 2.8%, compared with 16.7% at the east side of the wall, while in the middle of the West Bank this percentage was 39.6% for west of the wall and 18.0% for east of the wall, and the same percentage at the south of the West Bank was 15.8% west of the wall and 13.1% east of the wall. Also the results showed that the percentage of the individuals aged 16 years or more who are thinking to change their place of residence and living to the west of the wall in the north of the West Bank was 2.1%, comparing to 2.2% for who are living to the east side of the wall. While in the middle of the West Bank this percentage was 22.7% for west of the wall, and 4.4% for east of the wall. At the south of the West Bank the percentage of who are thinking to change their place of residence was 2.3% for east of the wall. Families dissociation from each other and from relatives: 30.6% of Palestinian households or one of their individuals in the localities affected by the expansion and annexation wall have been separated from relatives (45.3% west of the wall and 28.8% east of the wall). The results also revealed that 2.6% of the Palestinian households 5 in the localities affected by the wall have been separated from the father (1.8% west of the wall and 2.7% east of the wall). Separation from health services and obstacles against movements and transportation: The survey results indicated that 80.7% of the Palestinian households living west of the wall indicated that separation from the health services (hospitals and medical centers) in the main cities formed an obstacle for them to get the required health services, while this percentage was 48.6% in the east side of the wall. Also the disability of medical staff to reach the localities formed obstacle for 78.0% of the households located west of the wall and 42.3% of the households located east of the wall. The results concerning the obstacles against movement and transportation for individuals/some of the individuals living west of the wall also showed that 90.0% of the Palestinian households reported that the time required for transportation and crossing checkpoints was a main obstacle against movement. Land confiscation: The results revealed that the percentage of households whose lands were confiscated totally was 9.1% of the households living west of the wall against 24.9% for east of the wall, while the percentage of the households living west of the wall whose parts of their land were confiscated was 19.9% against 20.3% for east of the wall. It’s noticed that most of the confiscated land in the localities affected by the wall were used for agriculture, and it amounted 86.0%. Labor market in the localities affected by the wall: The rate of unemployment in the localities affected by the expansion and annexation wall amounted 30.9%, (25.2% west of the wall and 31.6% east of the wall). Most of the workers in the localities affected by the wall were paid workers as their percentage were 73.6% for west of the wall, and 62.8% for east of the wall. While it’s noticeable that the percentages of employers and self-employed workers amounted 10.1% and 13.8% respectively in the localities west of the wall. The results also revealed that 13.8% of workers in the localities affected by the wall works in Israel and settlements (24.6 % west of the wall and 12.4% east of the wall). Humanitarian aid Results show that 13.2% of households or one/some of their individuals in the localities affected by the wall reported that they received humanitarian assistance during June 2004, (7.3% west of the wall and 13.9% east of the wall). While 81.2% of the households reported that they received assistance for only one time (85.4% west of the wall and 80.9% east of the wall). Concerning the kind of assistance 43.4% of the total assistance were provided in the form of food supplies (42.8% west of the wall and 43.5% east of the wall), and 40.4% were in cash (46.9% west of the wall and 39.9% east of the wall). However, the frequency of providing the assistance for households, relatives were rated highest rank at 30.0%, followed by Ministry of Social Affairs by 27.7%, then from UNRWA by 11.8%. Steadfastness strategies: The results indicated that the households in the Palestinian localities affected by the wall depended on several methods to steadfast during the last six months, as 89.3% of the households in the Palestinian Territory reported that they depend on their monthly income (92.4% west of the wall and 88.1% east of the wall), where as 84.3% of the Palestinian households reduced there monthly expenditure (69.6% west of the wall and 89.6% east of the 6 wall), and 70.9% delayed payment of bills (63.3% west of the wall and 73.6% east of the wall). Income Sources Results of the survey indicated that 37.4% of the Palestinian households living west of the wall depended on wages and salaries from Palestinian private sector as a main income source before the construction of the wall, against 38.4% depend on this source after the construction of the wall, also 32.9% of the Palestinian households living west of the wall depended on wages and salaries from the Israeli working sectors before the construction of the wall, against 28.4% depend on the same source after the construction of the wall. While in the localities located east of the wall 34.4% of the households depended on wages and salaries from the Israeli working sectors before the construction of the wall, against 13.5% depend on this source after the construction of the wall, and 29.8% depended on wages and salaries from Palestinian private sector before the construction of the wall and 35.1% depend on the same source after the construction of the wall. Priority needs of households The results reveal that 38.5% of households in the localities affected by the expansion and annexation wall reported the need for work as top priority for their localities (23.5% west of the wall and 40.3% east of the wall), and 25.4% of the households reported the need for improving the infrastructure in their localities as top priority for these localities (43.2% west of the wall and 23.3% east of the wall), while 13.6% of households expressed the need for medical services in their localities (16.0% west of the wall and 13.3% east of the wall), and 11.1% of households in the localities affected by the wall expressed the need for security and stability as a top priority for their localities (9.3% west of the wall and 11.3% east of the wall). Concerning the needs of the households the results showed that 53.5% of the households in the localities affected by the expansion and annexation wall expressed the need for food as a top priority (52.2% west of the wall and 53.6% east of the wall), and 12.9% of households expressed the need for money (18.5% west of the wall and 12.3% east of the wall), while 9.8% of the households expressed the need for work (6.6% west of the wall and 10.2% east of the wall). Effects of the wall on the family and social relationships: The results showed that 90.7% of households living west of the wall had their ability to visit family and relatives been affected by the wall, against 70.6% of the households living east of the wall. The wall also affected the ability of households to visit religious and holy places at 89.5% for west of the wall, against 81.8% for east of the wall. The survey results indicated that the percentage of households living west of the wall who have obstacles to marry a partner living in the other side of the wall raised from12.6% before the construction of the wall to 64.2% after this construction. It’s noticed that the percentage of households west of the wall that have obstacles to marry a partner living in the other side of the wall raised heavily since the wall construction, as it was 9.1% before this construction and it becomes 57.3% after that. Availability of holding: The results showed that 24.9% of the households in the localities affected by the expansion and annexation wall have holdings (14.3% west of the wall and 26.1% east of the wall). Concerning the kind of holdings 74.0% of the households affected by wall said that they have only plant holdings, while 11.8% of the households said that they have only animal holdings 7 .2004& ! " #$ "% :1 Table 1: Palestinian Households and Population by Selected Background Characteristics and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Indicator Number of Households Total 2689 Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 293 2396 Distribution of Persons by Sex Male 50.7 50.7 50.5 Female 49.3 49.3 49.5 Total 100 100 100 Age Less than 15 years 42.3 42.6 39.7 15 15-24 18.2 17.9 20.5 2415 25-34 11.8 11.8 11.9 3425 35-44 11.0 11.1 9.6 4435 45-54 7.2 7.1 8.3 5445 55-64 4.6 4.4 5.7 6455 65+ 4.9 5.1 4.3 +65 Total 100 100 100 Refugee Status Refugee 36.0 36.8 29.4 ! Non Refugee 64.0 63.2 70.6 ! " Total Qualification for Persons 10 Years and Over Illiterate 100 100 100 10.1 10.2 Can Read and Write 22.9 22.8 23.4 % Elementary 23.3 23.2 24.9 #&' Preparatory 22.5 22.4 23.2 ( Secondary $%& ' 10 ! "# 8.9 #$ 13.3 13.2 13.9 () Lower Diploma 3.5 3.6 2.4 * %' Bachelor and Over 4.4 4.6 3.3 +%,- ." ' Total 100 100 100 8 .2004("# $ %& # '# ! ! :( ) 1 Table 1(Continue): Palestinian Households and Population by Selected Background Characteristics and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Indicator Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall Total East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 15 " ()*+ ), Labor Force Status for Persons 15 Years and Over $%& In Labor Force 33.8 33.8 34.2 %/ 01 2 Outside Labor Force 66.2 66.2 65.8 %/ 01 3 2 Total 100 100 100 Unemployment Rate 30.9 31.6 25.2 -+ + Marital Status for Persons 12 Years and Over $%& 12 . Never Married 47.2 47.5 45.1 4$ Legally Married 1.4 1.3 2.6 2 " 5 ! 1 Married 46.3 46.1 48.4 34 Divorced 0.5 0.5 0.2 %* Widowed 4.4 4.5 3.5 $ Separated 0.2 0.1 0.2 67 Total 100 100 100 .2004("# $ %& # '# , %- ./ 0# 1 * + " :2 Table 2: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Households by Type of Housing Unit, and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Type of Housing Unit Villa Total 2.0 Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the West of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 1.9 2.9 % 8"- House 61.5 61.8 59.4 Apartment 34.5 34.2 37.5 1 Independent Room 1.8 1.9 0.2 %1 - Other 0.2 0.2 _ 0 2$ Total 100 100 100 9 .2004# ! " :3 Table 3: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Households by Type of Tenure of Housing Unit, and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Tenure of Housing Unit Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 83.7 79.1 ( Owned 83.2 Rented 9.6 8.7 17.7 , Other 7.2 7.6 3.2 0 2$ Total 100 100 100 9% .2004# &' & /! :4 Table4: Percentage Distribution of Persons Who left Education by Reason and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Reason for Leaving Education Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall / + Expansion and Annexation Wall 0.1 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 0.1 Security situation 3.3 3.0 5.3 # No desire of academic education 9.5 9.7 7.3 #" "%/ #- ' No desire of coeducation 0.7 0.7 0.6 *%2 "%/ #- ' Repeated grades frequently 3.1 3.2 2.1 Do not care about study 13.5 12.9 17.8 ' :! Low economic situation of the household Household problems 26.0 25.2 31.7 5 ; (6! 1.0 1.1 0.4 " $ 4.4 4.8 1.2 5 -,' "/ Take care of household members West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall - 11.2 11.3 10.3 34 Illness/ Disabled 1.6 1.8 0.5 >/< School does not existe nearby 7.6 7.7 6.4 '" Bad treatment from Teachers 0.7 0.7 1.0 " %/ ? Exiled from school due to passing legal age 0.1 0.1 - 4 '' 67 No desire of family 7.2 7.3 6.5 : ' The child 's not reach of the legal age Other 8.1 8.4 6.0 #1 7* @%' 1.9 2.0 2.9 0 2$ Total 100 100 100 Marriage #1 10 .2004# "' & (& ) * :5 Table 5: Percentage of Palestinian Households by Availability of Durable Goods, and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Durable Goods Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 23.3 31.7 ( Private Car 24.2 Refrigerator 95.5 95.5 96.0 8) Solar Boiler 75.1 74.1 83.9 # 2 Mobile (with Jawwal) 63.7 61.7 80.6 (%2 A: Jawwal 19.3 20.5 9.3 Cooking Stove 98.6 98.8 97.5 4 B'* Washing Machine 89.3 88.8 93.4 .'8 Home Library 22.1 21.6 26.0 "4 ' T.V 94.3 93.8 98.1 "47% Video 25.5 23.6 41.6 ""- Computer 25.6 25.1 29.7 "' Phone Line 49.9 50.0 48.6 A: *2 Satellite 61.5 60.5 69.8 C"8 Internet 6.7 6.7 7.3 C Central Heating 3.9 3.7 5.7 "4 &- 62 5 " .2004# *+ ,- ! . +&/ ) * :6 Table 6: Percentage of Palestinian Persons Who Change Place of Residence, by Region and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Region Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 16.7 2.8 *- North West Bank 16.3 Middle West Bank 23.4 18.0 39.6 "' D 7 * South West Bank 13.3 13.1 15.8 "' D 7 11 "' D 7 ,- ! . +&/ :7 .2004# Table 7: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Persons Who Changed Current Place of Residence, by Reasons and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Total Reasons Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 6.8 7.9 + Work 7.0 Study 1.7 1.8 1.4 Marriage 22.3 23.9 15.5 34 Accompany / 43.8 41.1 55.3 1- Medical 0.1 0.1 0.2 38/ Expansion and Annexation Wall 0.1 0.1 - Other Israeli Measures 4.7 5.0 3.3 0 2 "%"& > C? > 11.4 13.4 2.4 * < + 5/ Protection Jerusalem Identity 0.5 0.1 2.4 "1 "E +% F7G Others 8.4 7.7 11.6 0 2$ Total 100 100 100 Coming back to homeland !" " #$% 16 :8 .2004)& ' #( Table 8: Percentage of Palestinian Persons 16 Years and over Who Think to Change Current Place of Residence, by Region and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Region Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 2.2 2.1 *- North West Bank 2.2 Middle West Bank 9.4 4.4 22.7 "' D 7 * South West Bank 2.3 2.3 - "' D 7 12 "' D 7 ! !" " #$% 16 + & :9 .2004)& ' Table 9: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Persons 16 Years and over Who Thinking to Change Current Place of Residence, by Reasons and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Reasons Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 17.6 3.4 + Work 11.3 Study 2.1 3.4 0.4 Marriage 1.7 2.7 0.6 34 41.9 35.8 49.7 1- - - - 38/ 23.7 13.0 37.1 7.3 9.0 5.3 0 2 "%"& > C? > 1.4 2.5 - * < + 5/ 3.7 5.2 1.8 "1 "E +% F7G 6.9 10.8 1.7 0 2$ 100 100 100 Accompany Medical Expansion and Annexation Wall Other Israeli Measures Coming back to homeland Protection of Jerusalem Identity Other Total / ! "! " # $%& & & / :10 .2004(! ' Table 10: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Households by Separation of Household and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Household Member Some/All of them Separated from Relatives All Household Separated Total 6.9 Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 5.0 22.5 3 # 4 4/( "01 5 " C%67 One member/Some members Separated Not Separated 23.7 23.8 22.8 5 -$ </'/ - 67 69.4 71.2 54.7 G$ 67" Total 100 100 100 13 ' ! "! *+ $%& & ,# :11 2004(! Table 11: Percentage of Palestinian Households Whose Members Separated by Person Separated and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Person Total Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion West of the Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 2.7 1.8 1 Father 2.6 Mother 0.3 0.3 - !$ Son/Daughter 3.1 3.1 2.7 C'/' 14 .2004, !"# $% &# ' $ (") * + :12 Table 12: Percentage of Palestinian Households who Facing Obstacles Access to Health Services by Type of Obstacles and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004 Type of Obstacle Total Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the Expansion East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 48.6 80.7 Remoteness of Health Centers 52.0 Inability for Medical Staff to Reach Health Centers 46.1 42.3 78.0 () $ " & ' Lack of Medicines and Other Essential Medical Needs Lack of Equipment 42.0 39.1 65.9 * !+ * % 37.0 33.9 63.4 * !, &!, !" - % Lack of Child Health Care Services 28.2 24.1 62.6 (1 2-) & $./ 0 % Lack of Maternal Care Services 25.5 21.0 63.4 ( - 2/%) / 3+ % 0.9 0.9 1.2 4 1 Other 15 !" $% ( !" ) .2004, $ " (23 $*) $ " $% + "0 / ". &( (") * + :13 Table 13: Percentage of Palestinian Households By Coping Method to Face School Educational Difficulties (Basic, Secondary) and Higher Education Caused by Location From the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Total Coping Method / Basic/ Secondary / Basic/ Secondary West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 81.1 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 42.3 West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 66.5 Using Students Alternative Roads Changing Schools 81.5 48.1 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 81.6 10.3 16.5 11.1 6.1 17.2 14.3 6 Changing Place of Residence Absent from School Due to Closure 34.6 4.5 35.5 29.5 3.1 9.0 '7 " 6 81.0 77.6 81.6 77.9 78.9 73.5 5) 1 - Using Permits, or Special Coordination 40.2 11.0 40.1 41.2 10.0 14.4 1 ' 1 9 - 3.4 - - 4.0 1.5 Enrolled to the Available Branch in the Locality Higher Education Higher Education + 5 8 : $% % ; /7 " 1 <" => <) Other 2.3 4.5 2.6 0.5 16 5.4 1.6 4 1 .2004, $ " (23 $*) $ " $% &" '+5 67 (. &( (") * + :14 Table 14: Percentage of Palestinian Households By Coping Method of Educational Costs (Basic, Secondary) and Higher Education by Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Total Coping Method Higher Education Higher Education / Basic/ Secondary East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 68.5 / Basic/ Secondary West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 53.9 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 67.9 West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 54.4 !" # Borrowed Money 67.4 66.7 Received Assistance 21.3 18.5 22.0 13.3 19.2 11.5 (+ / Used their Saving 45.9 35.2 45.0 55.6 34.8 38.7 Work 32.7 32.9 33.0 28.9 33.7 23.9 - () 3+ Other 11.0 10.1 11.1 9.5 10.1 10.2 4 1 17 <7 .2004$ ! " # :15 Table 15: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Households by Land Confiscation, and Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Confiscation Total Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 24.9 West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 9.1 All Land was Confiscated 23.4 Part of the Land was Confiscated 20.3 20.3 19.9 No Land was Confiscated 56.4 54.8 71.0 Total 100 100 100 .2004$ ( )& ' ! :16 Table 16: Percentage of Households Whose Land was Confiscated by Land Use, July-2004. Land Use Built Area Agricultural Area Percentage 2.6 86.0 ! Grazing Area 7.3 ! Archeological/Entertainment Area 1.0 $%/" 13.2 & 0.1 '& Not used Area Other 18 * +, )/ .0 )* - ./0- ) 10 * +, :17 ول .2004$ ! " # Table 17:Perecntage Distribution of Labour Force Participants Aged 10 Years and Over in the Localities Affected by the Wall by Labour Force Components and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall Unemployed Persons Total Employed Persons West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 100 25.2 74.8 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 100 31.6 68.4 Total 100 30.9 69.1 " # * .0 )* " ./0- ) 10 "* :18 .2004$ ! Table 18: Percentage Distribution of Employed Persons Aged 10 Years and Over in the Localities Affected by the Wall by Employment Status and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall Total Unpaid Family Member West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 100 2.5 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 100 7.0 Total 100 5.1 ! Paid Employee 73.6 "# $ % Self Employed & ' Employer 13.8 10.1 62.8 16.9 13.3 67.4 15.6 11.9 19 # 1#2 3 .0 )* " ./0- ) 10 "* :19 .2004 $ ! " Table 19: Percentage Distribution of Employed Persons Aged 10 Years and Over in the Localities Affected by the Wall by Economic Activity and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall Economic Activity Total West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 0.3 ( Agriculture, fishing and forestry 3.1 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 5.3 Mining, quarrying and manufacturing 8.1 8.1 8.2 *( ! ( ) Construction 7.7 8.0 7.4 13.3 10.1 17.4 + !, 3.3 3.5 2.9 -.. -/ 0 64.5 65.0 63.8 '& 1+ -& 100 100 100 Commerce, restaurants and hotels Transportation, storage and communication Services and other branches Total 20 ( ! ! " # ' .0 )* " ./0- ) 10 "* :20 .2004$ Table 20: Percentage Distribution of Employed Persons Aged 10 Years and Over in the Localities Affected by the Wall by Occupation and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall Occupation Legislator & Managers Total 4.0 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 3.9 " West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 4.0 *) 2 +3 ! 12.9 12.2 13.6 & + & Services & Sales Workers 6.9 7.2 6.5 ! -/( % ! -& % *) Skilled Agricultural & Fishery Workers 2.7 4.9 - 4 ! % $ ) 10.0 10.5 9.4 $ $ 5( % *) 4.5 3.5 5.9 6) -.7 *8 59.0 57.8 60.6 $ 100 Professionals, Technicians, Associated Professionals & Clerks Craft and Related Workers Palm & Machine Operators & Assemblers Elementary Occupations Total 100 100 21 # * "/ .0 )* " ./0- ) 10 "* :21 .2004$ ! " Table 21: Percentage Distribution of Employed Persons Aged 10 Years and Over in the Localities Affected by the Wall by Place of Work and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Place of Work Total Palestinian Territory: Number 66186 Percentage Israel and Settlements: Number Percentage Total: Number Percentage Location from the Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 59450 6736 & ) ! 86.2 87.6 75.4 10620 8421 2199 !: 13.8 12.4 24.6 76806 67871 8935 ! 100 100 100 22 :,*+ -, :; : 2004 ! :22 " Table 22: Percentage Distribution of Households by Received Assistance During June 2004 and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall Received Assistance during June/ 2004 Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 13.9 7.3 + ,- Received Assistance 13.2 Not Received Assistance 86.8 86.1 92.7 -! <0* Total 100 100 100 -! -0* 2004 ! :23 " Table 23: Percentage Distribution of Households by Number of Received Assistance During June 2004 and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall Number of Received Assistance Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion West of the Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 80.9 85.4 ,- + 1 81.2 2 16.6 16.7 14.6 2 3+ 2.2 2.4 - +3 Total 100 100 100 23 1 ! "# :24 2004 '$ % & Table 24: Percentage of Households by Measures Taken by Household to Maintain Financial Stability During the last 6 Months and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Measures Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall +. Family income 89.3 East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 88.1 Reduced their expenditures 84.3 89.6 69.6 -0+ ?+& Postponed paying bills 70.9 73.6 63.3 % % @ Borrowed money 47.8 49.4 43.3 % . Assistance from Family and Friends Working in farming or breeding livestock Sold Jewels or part of it 19.5 19.9 18.2 A *:) ! <*! ( 21.4 24.1 13.8 -( ? ! 25.7 West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall 92.4 >$ & <*! !. 25.9 25.0 -6 Used their Saving in Israeli Saving Funds Used their Saving 2.3 2.5 1.8 *:2 % % -& & 35.8 38.1 29.3 -& & Selling of available durable goods 5.6 3.9 10.6 ) * B" -0 Borrowing from banks or financial institution Sold or mortgaged lands or buildings Sent at least one family member from students to work Sent at least one family member from others to work 4.0 4.9 1.5 ?A <*! ( 4.3 4.6 3.3 -0! ? 6/ 7.5 7.2 8.2 ) /, % C 3.5 2.9 5.2 ) &D % C 24 *) + 2004 &$ ( ! ") ! $ :25 & Table 25: Percentage Distribution of Assistance that the Households Received During June 2004 by Assistance Type and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall Assistant Type Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 43.5 42.8 Food 43.4 Money 40.4 39.9 46.9 2.2 2.4 - () 0 Healthy Insurance E Jobs 3.2 3.4 - Other 10.8 10.8 10.3 '& Total 100 100 100 (") . ") !( " )) ") , ! $ :26 2004 '$ % & Table 26: Percentage Distribution of Households by Assistance Source (Frequency of Providing Assistance) and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Assistant Source Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 11.1 23.7 UNRWA 11.8 Ministry Social Affairs 27.7 28.7 11.6 !. H Relatives 30.0 29.5 37.5 A 6 Labour Unions 3.5 3.8 - ) - 0 Other PNA Institutions 7.3 7.3 7.3 '& ,* -H Charity Institutions 5.8 6.2 - /& -H International Institutions 5.6 5.4 8.1 -H/ :6 Friends and Neighbors 2.4 2.5 2.2 (//5)/A Political Parties 1.1 1.2 - (/:% Charity (Zakat) Committees 1.4 1.1 5.1 B8 Other 3.4 3.2 4.5 '& Total 100 100 100 25 2004 :27 Table 27: Distribution of Households by Main Source of Income and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall After Construction 17.6 Before Construction 21.9 After Construction 11.2 Household Projects 21.2 20.8 19.2 18.3 Wages and income from public sector 17.8 15.5 10.9 11.0 ! " # $ 1.9 2.2 2.0 2.0 $ ! " # $ Wages and income from private sector 35.1 29.8 38.4 37.4 % &' ( ) * + " # $ Wages and income from Israeli work sector 13.5 34.4 28.4 32.9 &,- " # $ Wages and Salaries from UNRWA 1.5 1.5 0.7 0.7 ./ ! " # $ Wages and Salaries from International Intuitions Receive remittances from inside 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 ,0 " 1 3.3 2.7 5.2 5.2 &' % ) " 1 Receive remittances from abroad 4.1 3.5 10.4 11.3 2 ) " 1 19.4 13.4 8.4 7.3 6.1 5.4 7.9 8.3 3)$ Income Source Agriculture Wages and income from Foreign Government Social assistances Other 26 Before Construction 13.0 ! "! # $% & :28 2004 '& Table 28: Percentage Distribution of Households by First Priority Needs of Locality and Location From The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Needs Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion and West of the Expansion Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 40.3 23.5 Create jobs 38.5 Health Services 13.6 13.3 16.0 Food assistances 5.1 5.3 3.1 Education Services 3.9 4.0 2.5 Infrastructure 25.4 23.3 43.2 !" # Security and Stability 11.1 11.3 9.3 $% &' No Need 2.4 2.5 2.4 % Total 100 100 100 27 ( ) ! "! # $% & :29 2004 '& Table 29: Percentage Distribution of Households by First Priority Needs of the Households and Location From The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Needs Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the Expansion and West of the Expansion Annexation Wall and Annexation Wall 53.6 52.2 Total Food 53.5 Jobs 9.8 10.2 6.6 ) 12.9 12.3 18.5 $! Education 7.9 8.2 4.9 Treatments 9.1 9.2 8.0 *+ Having House 2.6 2.6 3.2 &, Entertainment Activities 0.5 0.5 - - #!. Clothes 0.6 0.6 0.4 /"+ Infrastructure Project 2.5 2.2 5.1 !" Other 0.6 0.6 1.1 0 . Total 100 100 100 Money () ,- "! * 1/* +% ! $* ,-. / $ % :30 .2004'& Table 30: Percentage of Households Who Faced Restrictions to Move Around, by Restrictions and Location From The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Restrictions Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the West of the Expansion and Expansion and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 64.3 90.0 Time Spent to Pass 67.1 Timing of Passage 55.2 53.1 73.5 " $! Moving Crossing Conditions (Permission, Some ID Cards) 55.8 54.4 67.2 4 5 6 ) " # Other 11.2 11.8 6.6 1 " $! 1+ 2 (7 28 0 . "! 3* .4 356% 37. (. $ % :31 .2004'& .4 7/56% 8% Table 31: Percentage of Households Whose Social Activities were Affected by the Expansion and Annexation Wall by Type of Activity and Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Total Type of Activity Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion and Expansion and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 70.6 90.7 Ability to Visit Relatives 72.7 Practicing Cultural and Social Activities Practicing Entertainment Activities 65.2 63.3 81.0 % $: #! 70.1 68.5 84.0 - #! Visit the holy places 82.6 81.8 89.5 $ &,' 7 1 0.8 0.8 1.5 0 . Other 2' 4' 7 1 9 7 $ $* + ! ;6 * ! <& % * 9 $* :% 3 "! # $% & :32 .2004 –& 9= 3 Table 32: Percentage Distribution of Palestinian Households by Perception of Marrying a Partner Living in the Other Side of the Wall and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Total Trend of Household Vision Yes there is Obstacles East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall (!" " (!" "2 (!" " (!" "2 After Construction 64.2 Before Construction 12.6 After Construction 65.0 Before Construction 12.6 After Construction 57.3 Before Construction 9.1 ! " # ! ! No Obstacles 33.8 87.4 35.0 87.4 42.7 90.9 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 % ! 29 !" #$ :33 .2004& % Table 33: Percentage Distribution of Households by Impact of Expansion and Annexation Wall on the Movement of Female from and to the Locality and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Total Impact on Movement of Female Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall West of the East of the Expansion Expansion and and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 64.3 85.7 $% & '() *+, The Movement of Female Decreased 66.5 The Movement of Female Increased 1.6 1.6 1.5 ;!< , & 1 No Impact 31.9 34.1 12.8 ;!< , 9 := % Total 100 100 100 ;!< , & 2 2004 & % *! ) #( # :34 Table 34: Percentage Distribution of Households by the Main Mean of Obtaining Water and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Mean of obtaining water Public water network Water tanks East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall (!" " (!" "2 After Construction 88.7 Before Construction 88.6 After Construction 87.9 Total Before Construction 87.7 West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall (!" " (!" "2 After Construction 95.5 Before Construction 96.2 (* - '() .* > ," 5.2 5.1 5.5 5.4 2.2 2.6 5.9 6.0 6.4 6.6 2.0 0.8 - - - - - - . "! Other 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0 . Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 Domestic well Spring ,! > " ?1! & 30 2004 :35 Table 35: Percentage Distribution of Households by Household Evaluation of Water Quality and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Household evaluation of water quality Good Total East of the Expansion and Annexation Wall (!" " (!" "2 After Construction 57.9 Before Construction 63.5 After Construction 59.2 Before Construction 64.5 West of the Expansion and Annexation Wall (!" " (!" "2 After Construction 46.4 Before Construction 54.6 **/ " # " .* 7 33.5 30.9 32.5 30.0 41.8 38.7 # Bad 8.6 5.6 8.3 5.5 11.8 6.7 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 Fairly Good :36 2004 " ! Table 36: Percentage Distribution of Households that have Holding by Type of holding and Location from Expansion and Annexation Wall, July-2004. Type of Holding Total Location from The Expansion and Annexation Wall East of the West of the Expansion and Expansion and Annexation Wall Annexation Wall 74.9 59.8 *) 0 "0* Plant Holding 74.0 Animal Holding 11.8 11.3 19.9 ! Mixed Holding 14.2 13.8 20.3 # Total 100 100 100 Percentage of Households that have Holding 24.9 26.1 14.3 1 71 - ? ' "! 31 "!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz