TABLE 124. Federal obligations for R&D plant for selected agencies, by state and other locations: FYs 2002–10
(Dollars in millions)
State/location
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
All locations
4,289.7
4,239.8
3,979.3
3,749.1
2,093.1
2,111.0
1,893.3
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
176.1
281.4
6.7
13.0
523.9
92.5
133.9
38.3
6.0
519.3
37.3
126.8
27.7
7.7
987.7
27.1
15.8
6.7
0.7
972.4
6.4
4.8
3.6
1.7
427.7
1.4
7.6
62.6
8.6
404.8
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
118.3
51.6
1.0
52.8
196.1
97.1
48.7
0.9
18.7
173.0
82.9
46.8
0.6
118.1
120.9
89.3
87.8
0.4
33.3
107.0
97.7
4.3
*
105.8
1.6
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
18.0
6.4
12.7
100.7
11.9
7.5
1.9
7.0
122.1
12.3
16.4
7.0
22.6
122.9
7.7
98.7
43.8
23.1
104.7
4.2
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
16.3
5.6
0.9
35.9
8.1
30.0
1.9
3.1
56.8
0.9
107.0
1.3
7.4
17.2
4.8
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
210.3
24.2
5.1
8.2
43.4
106.0
233.4
17.0
4.2
24.4
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
5.2
8.0
4.8
16.5
1.3
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
2009
2010
3,591.3 r
6,563.3
2.6
3.6
5.7
6.1
291.0
4.2
173.5
20.5
8.9
475.5
98.1
57.8
194.9
28.5
1,087.8
183.8
1.9
*
73.4
11.4
115.9
5.6
0.4
76.7
12.9
279.5
3.1
0.5
180.4
56.7 r
300.0
123.2
13.5
364.9
140.7
128.7
5.6
7.0
84.6
2.7
131.7
8.0
8.7
89.2
4.1
36.0
3.1
5.9
61.7
3.7
53.8
25.3
16.6
233.8
7.5
58.5
38.1
25.2
281.3
34.9
32.0
10.2
25.2
15.4
3.8
62.3
0.3
7.2
36.7
3.8
64.4
1.6
0.8
6.2
1.8
11.3
0.4
5.6
2.8
0.8
11.1
2.9
2.5
26.7
6.3
28.3
12.7
21.8
28.4
1.4
472.7
21.6
8.0
5.7
11.0
515.1
90.5
3.3
4.3
11.1
250.5
49.1
3.5
0.8
20.5
157.1
32.7
2.6
4.7
19.4
262.1
13.9
1.3
0.9
3.1
238.7
48.8
11.3
8.5
25.3
1,137.3
102.7
45.0
24.1
77.6
21.2
6.5
0.8
12.4
2.8
4.7
3.4
1.5
7.6
6.6
11.3
6.3
*
7.2
3.4
6.3
6.5
0.7
40.9
4.0
1.3
1.4
0.7
32.5
1.1
1.9
0.9
1.0
4.3
0.8
5.8
2.0
0.9
1.2
2.1
30.5
23.3
22.2
1.8
11.1
29.2
127.8
129.2
8.6
1.7
72.5
187.9
89.2
26.2
0.2
50.5
269.4
71.3
21.0
NA
51.0
183.3
97.1
8.5
4.4
56.9
110.8
100.8
4.1
0.3
90.2
29.2
80.4
3.0
NA
53.3
184.6
81.7
4.9
0.7
82.8
108.7
326.0
12.2
2.0
74.5
190.5
309.7
36.7
5.9
56.3
4.3
7.3
34.8
4.5
26.4
14.4
8.3
79.6
1.9
19.5
17.6
7.1
26.8
1.6
26.1
4.2
4.0
24.7
1.1
17.0
0.9
2.8
17.4
0.4
21.5
2.5
4.1
12.9
1.6
16.7
12.8
2.9
35.0
4.4
24.3
5.7
4.9
37.8
3.6
100.5
19.0
35.9
127.1
15.9
TABLE 124. Federal obligations for R&D plant for selected agencies, by state and other locations: FYs 2002–10
(Dollars in millions)
State/location
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
18.5
6.7
3.1
333.3
1,399.2
0.2
10.0
1.1
309.6
1,370.4
12.0
8.6
10.8
199.7
568.7
2.4
20.7
2.3
198.9
486.8
1.0
3.5
0.5
111.8
42.1
0.1
7.3
0.5
143.6
7.5
0.8
11.4
0.3
188.8
20.6
4.7
14.7
2.2
330.1
39.9
6.1
24.5
2.6
371.6
430.3
8.4
0.1
99.9
18.6
8.7
8.3
NA
147.3
30.6
6.0
1.1
0.6
179.3
32.4
11.3
4.3
0.7
170.4
34.3
10.2
0.5
0.3
129.0
30.0
20.7
3.9
0.2
283.9
29.6
16.0
1.9
0.8
268.9
13.5
13.1
83.7
0.6
268.6
215.2
52.2
12.1
3.2
215.1
89.0
35.7
Wisconsin
Wyoming
23.9
47.7
56.2
58.2
65.1
47.1
30.6
36.9
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
NA
0.8
1.7
NA
0.0
0.0
Offices abroada
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.6
*
Other areasb
* = amount greater than $0 but less than $50,000. NA = not available; data collected for this table were not recorded at that level in that particular fiscal year. r = data significantly
revised; replaces previously published value.
33.3
1.2
0.0
7.4
a
Includes R&D performed or administered in foreign countries by U.S. government.
Includes America Samoa, Baker Island, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Marshall Islands, Midway Islands,
Navassa Island, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Palmyra Atoll, Virgin Islands of the United States, and Wake Island.
b
NOTES: Because of rounding, detail may not add to total. Eleven agencies are required to report data for this section of survey: Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense
(DOD), Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, the Interior, and Transportation; Environmental Protection Agency; National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA); and National Science Foundation. These obligations represented over 98% of federal R&D plant obligations in FY 2010. Although nongeographic historical tables incorporate
corrections to previously reported data that have been submitted by reporting agencies, corresponding corrections to geographic distributions are rarely obtainable. Geographic
distribution of DOD development funding to industry reflects location of prime contractors and not numerous subcontractors who perform most R&D. In FY 2006 NASA reclassified as
operational costs funding for Space Operations, Hubble Space Telescope, Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy, and James Webb Space Telescope previously reported as
R&D plant. In FY 2010 NASA resumed reporting International Space Station obligations as R&D plant.
SOURCE: National Science Foundation/National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Federal Funds for Research and Development.