2010 SA MSF
Trial Results
Richard Saunders
Rural Solutions SA
PO Box 411 Loxton SA 5333
0419 853 089
[email protected]
No part of this document may be reproduced without the express permission of the author.
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 1
17 February 2011
Trial Results
Wheat Variety Trials....................................................................3
MSF v’s NVT trials ........................................................ 7
Barley Variety Trials ................................................................. 8
MSF v’s NVT trials ...................................................... 12
Durum Variety Trials ................................................................. 13
Durum by Seeding Point Trial ..................................................17
Time of Seeding by Variety Trials .......................................... 18
Time of seeding by Nutrition Trial ......................................... 21
Cladium/Mycorrhiza Trials...................................................... 25
Paringa Precision Ag Trial ......................................................26
SeedHawk Demo Trial ..............................................................28
Trace Element Demo Trial ......................................................30
Acknowledgements
Bill Davoren – seeder and spray equipment
Andrew Etherton – Supply of Scout Wheat
AGT – supply of Clearfield tolerant wheat lines and Intervix
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 2
17 February 2011
MSF Core Site Wheat Variety Demonstration 2010
Variety
Grade
Axe
Catalina
Correll
Derrimut
Espada
Gladius
Katana
Lincoln
Mace
Peake
Pugsley
Scout
Wyalkatchem
Yitpi
Young
Mean
LSD (P<0.05)
CV %
AH
AH
AH
AH
APW
AH
AH
AH
APW
AH
APW
APW
APW
AH
AH
Yield
t/ha
2.075
2.561
2.722
2.407
2.705
2.536
2.428
2.783
2.118
2.528
2.793
2.783
2.213
2.760
2.312
2.515
0.353
8.4
Rank
15
7
5
11
6
8
10
3
14
9
1
2
13
4
12
%
Mean
82
102
108
96
108
101
97
111
84
101
111
111
88
110
92
P = 0.0028
14
Protein
%
10.2
8.8
8.7
8.6
9.2
9.4
9.2
8.8
10.5
8.7
8.2
8.7
9.8
8.1
9.8
9.1
Scrn
%
2.7
3.4
5.8
4.1
4.2
3.9
3.2
3.8
2.8
6.6
6.2
3.1
3.3
8.4
2.1
4.2
Grain
Density
kg/hL
83.4
86.4
82.0
84.0
81.6
83.6
85.4
82.6
83.8
83.0
82.6
83.4
84.6
83.4
84.2
83.6
Pay
Grade
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
APW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
Protein
%
9.4
9.3
8.5
8.9
9.8
10.4
9.5
8.5
10.9
8.9
8.8
8.7
10.6
7.9
9.4
9.3
Scrn
%
4.0
3.2
9.6
4.5
4.2
3.8
3.7
5.4
2.0
5.2
4.3
4.0
2.2
8.3
2.6
4.5
Grain
Density
kg/hL
83.4
87.0
81.4
85.0
83.0
84.8
86.6
83.4
84.8
83.6
83.6
86.4
84.8
83.0
84.6
84.4
Pay
Grade
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
APW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
APW1
ASW1
ASW1
$/tonne
$/ha
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
298.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
535.28
660.71
702.17
620.89
697.96
654.28
626.48
717.91
631.21
652.32
720.57
718.13
571.04
712.14
596.43
diff
from top
-185.30
-59.86
-18.41
-99.69
-22.62
-66.29
-94.09
-2.66
-89.36
-68.26
0.00
-2.45
-149.53
-8.43
-124.14
Waikerie Wheat Variety Demonstration 2010
Variety
Grade
Axe
Catalina
Correll
Derrimut
Espada
Gladius
Katana
Lincoln
Mace
Peake
Pugsley
Scout
Wyalkatchem
Yitpi
Young
Mean
LSD (P<0.05)
CV %
AH
AH
AH
AH
APW
AH
AH
AH
APW
AH
APW
APW
APW
AH
AH
Yield
t/ha
2.486
2.556
2.616
2.688
2.716
2.700
2.568
2.547
2.375
2.609
2.780
2.714
2.532
2.725
2.506
2.608
0.164
3.7
Rank
14
10
7
6
3
5
9
11
15
8
1
4
12
2
13
%
Mean
95
98
100
103
104
104
98
98
91
100
107
104
97
104
96
P = 0.0012
6
Prices
17/02/2011
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
$/tonne
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
298.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
298.00
258.00
258.00
$/ha
641.48
659.43
674.82
693.56
700.85
696.60
662.64
657.08
707.86
673.17
717.36
700.20
754.39
703.13
646.62
diff
from top
-112.91
-94.96
-79.57
-60.83
-53.54
-57.79
-91.75
-97.31
-46.53
-81.22
-37.03
-54.19
0.00
-51.26
-107.77
1 December 2010, Pool, Port Adelaide
2010 Mallee Cereal Trial Results.xlsx -- Wheat Tables
Page 3
2
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Wheat Demonstration Trials
AGT Katana
Axe
Catalina
Correll
Derrimut
Espada
Gladius
Lincoln
Mace
Peake
Pugsley
Scout
Wyalkatchem
Yitpi
Young
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
cv
mean
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn)
WUE (kg/mm)
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Yield
(t/ha)
2.428
2.075
2.561
2.722
2.407
2.705
2.536
2.783
2.118
2.528
2.793
2.783
2.213
2.760
2.312
2.515
0.353
8.4
2.515
7-May
261
75
16.7
110
MSF
WUE
kg/mm
Rank
16.1
10
13.7
15
17.0
7
18.0
5
15.9
11
17.9
6
16.8
8
18.4
3
14.0
14
16.7
9
18.5
1
18.4
2
14.7
13
18.3
4
15.3
12
P = 0.0028
%
mean
97
82
102
108
96
108
101
111
84
101
111
111
88
110
92
14
Yield
(t/ha)
2.568
2.486
2.556
2.616
2.688
2.716
2.700
2.547
2.375
2.609
2.780
2.714
2.532
2.725
2.506
2.608
0.164
3.7
Waikerie
WUE
kg/mm
Rank
17.0
9
16.5
14
16.9
10
17.3
7
17.8
6
18.0
3
17.9
5
16.9
11
15.7
15
17.3
8
18.4
1
18.0
4
16.8
12
18.0
2
16.6
13
P = 0.0012
%
mean
98
95
98
100
103
104
104
98
91
100
107
104
97
104
96
6
2.608
7-May
229
75
21.9
Page 4
Yield
(t/ha)
2.498
2.281
2.558
2.669
2.547
2.711
2.618
2.665
2.247
2.569
2.787
2.749
2.372
2.743
2.409
2.561
0.272
6.4
E
G*E
2.561
Correlation
MSF
GXE Mean
WUE
kg/mm
Rank
16.5
11
15.1
14
16.9
9
17.7
5
16.9
10
18.0
4
17.3
7
17.6
6
14.9
15
17.0
8
18.5
1
18.2
2
15.7
13
18.2
3
16.0
12
P = 0.0008
%
mean
98
89
100
104
99
106
102
104
88
100
109
107
93
107
94
11
P = 0.1660
P = 0.0634
Waikerie
0.7586
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Wheat Variety Demo trials
Waikerie
MSFP
3.000
2.500
Yield t/ha
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 5
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Wheat Variety Demo trials
3.500
3.000
Yield t/ha
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 6
17 February 2011
Wheat Yield Comparison NVT v's MSF trials
Variety Name
AGT Katana
Axe
Catalina
Correll
Derrimut
Espada
Gladius
Lincoln
Mace
Peake
Pugsley
Scout
Wyalkatchem
Yitpi
Young
Site Mean
LSD (t/ha)
CV (%)
Site Mean
Correlations
R²=
NVT
t/ha
3.332
3.046
3.096
3.214
3.134
3.248
3.122
3.288
3.348
3.104
3.406
3.472
3.370
3.220
3.090
3.233
rank
5
15
13
9
10
7
11
6
4
12
2
1
3
8
14
Site Mean
%
103
94
96
99
97
100
97
102
104
96
105
107
104
100
96
MSF
t/ha
2.498
2.281
2.558
2.669
2.547
2.711
2.618
2.665
2.247
2.569
2.787
2.749
2.372
2.743
2.409
2.561
0.272
6.4
3.233
Yield
0.2777
0.0771
rank
11
14
9
5
10
4
7
6
15
8
1
2
13
3
12
Site Mean
%
98
89
100
104
99
106
102
104
88
100
109
107
93
107
94
Sig. (P<=5%)
2.561
Rank
0.3536
0.1250
Linear regression
P (0.05) =0.3163
X-y GRAPH
y = 0.3577x + 1.4053
R² = 0.0771
2.900
2.800
MSF yields
2.700
2.600
2.500
2.400
2.300
2.200
2.100
2.000
3.000
3.100
3.200
3.300
3.400
3.500
NVT yields
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 7
17 February 2011
Waikerie Barley Variety Demonstration 2010
Variety
Barque
Buloke
Commander
Fleet
Hannan
Hindmarsh
Maritime
Schooner
SloopSA
Mean
LSD 5%
CV %
Grade
Yield
Rank
Feed
Malt
Malt
Feed
Feed
Feed
Feed
Malt
Malt
2.189
2.119
2.358
2.168
2.404
1.947
1.810
1.932
2.208
2.126
0.42
11.3
4
6
2
5
1
7
9
8
3
%
Mean
103
100
111
102
113
92
85
91
104
Protein
Scrn
TW
Retn
7.6
7.7
7.4
7.4
8.2
8.6
8.5
7.8
8.3
7.9
4.8
1.1
1.3
0.8
1.6
1.2
0.3
0.9
1.1
1.5
63.0
69.4
65.6
64.2
68.8
69.0
65.4
68.0
66.8
66.7
84.9
93.7
94.6
95.1
92.5
94.4
98.2
93.2
95.6
93.6
Protein
Scrn
TW
Retn
10.0
9.2
9.4
10.4
9.3
9.8
9.5
9.4
9.9
9.7
1.1
0.5
1.3
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.1
0.9
60.6
65.8
63.8
58.8
68.0
67.8
64.2
67.4
65.8
64.7
89.2
94.7
94.9
95.3
95.9
94.8
98.1
94.3
95.8
94.8
Bin
grade
Feed1
Malt1
Malt1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Malt1
Malt1
Bin
grade
$/t
192.00
298.00
298.00
192.00
192.00
192.00
192.00
298.00
298.00
Gross
Return
$/ha
420.22
631.57
702.82
416.17
461.50
373.91
347.49
575.83
658.05
$ diff to
top
-282.59
-71.24
0.00
-286.65
-241.32
-328.91
-355.32
-126.98
-44.77
Rank
Bin
grade
$/t
178.00
298.00
192.00
182.00
192.00
192.00
192.00
298.00
298.00
Gross
Return
$/ha
454.07
805.41
538.92
473.84
498.45
566.76
527.92
730.13
719.79
$ diff to
top
-351.34
0.00
-266.49
-331.58
-306.97
-238.66
-277.49
-75.28
-85.62
Rank
6
3
1
7
5
8
9
4
2
MSFP Barley Variety Demonstration 2010
Variety
Barque
Buloke
Commander
Fleet
Hannan
Hindmarsh
Maritime
Schooner
SloopSA
Mean
LSD 5%
CV %
Grade
Yield
Rank
Feed
Malt
Malt
Feed
Feed
Feed
Feed
Malt
Malt
2.551
2.703
2.807
2.603
2.596
2.952
2.750
2.450
2.415
2.647
0.39
8.5
7
4
2
5
6
1
3
8
9
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
%
Mean
96
102
106
98
98
111
104
93
91
Page 8
Bin
grade
Feed2
Malt1
Feed1
Feed3
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Malt1
Malt1
9
1
5
8
7
4
6
2
3
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Barley Demonstration Trials
Grade
Barque
Buloke
Commander
Fleet
Hannan
Hindmarsh
Maritime
Schooner
SloopSA
mean
Lsd (P,0.05)
cv
mean
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn)
WUE (kg/mm)
110
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Feed
Malt
Malt
Feed
Feed
Feed
Feed
Malt
Malt
Yield
(t/ha)
2.189
2.119
2.358
2.168
2.404
1.947
1.810
1.932
2.208
2.126
0.419
11.3
2.126
7-May
261
60
14.1
MSF
WUE
kg/mm
Rank
14.5
4
14.0
6
15.6
2
14.4
5
15.9
1
12.9
7
12.0
9
12.8
8
14.6
3
P = 0.119
%
mean
103
100
111
102
113
92
85
91
104
20
Waikerie
WUE
kg/mm
Rank
16.9
7
17.9
4
18.6
2
17.2
5
17.2
6
19.5
1
18.2
3
16.2
8
16.0
9
Yield
(t/ha)
2.551
2.703
2.807
2.603
2.596
2.952
2.750
2.450
2.415
2.647
0.393
8.5
P = 0.142
%
mean
96
102
106
98
98
111
104
93
91
15
2.647
7-May
229
60
22.2
Page 9
Yield
(t/ha)
2.370
2.411
2.583
2.386
2.500
2.450
2.280
2.191
2.312
2.387
0.467
9.8
E
G*E
2.387
Correlation
MSF
GxE
WUE
kg/mm
Rank
15.7
6
16.0
4
17.1
1
15.8
5
16.6
2
16.2
3
15.1
8
14.5
9
15.3
7
P = 0.6963
%
mean
99
101
108
100
105
103
96
92
97
20
P = 0.000
P = 0.046
Waikerie
-0.1939
17 February 2011
2009 Barley Variety Demo trials
MSFP
3.500
Waikerie
3.000
Yield t/ha
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
B
Barque
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
B l k
Buloke
C
d
Commander
Fl
Fleett
H
Hannan
Hi
d
h
Hindmarsh
M iti
Maritime
Page 10
S h
Schooner
Sl
SA
SloopSA
17 February 2011
2009 Mallee Barley Variety Demo trials
3.000
2.500
Yield t/ha
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 11
17 February 2011
Barley Yield Comparison NVT v's MSF trials
NVT
t/ha
2.675
2.875
3.080
2.780
2.760
2.750
2.425
2.620
2.735
Variety Name
Barque
Buloke
Commander
Fleet
Hindmarsh
Maritime
Schooner
Sloop SA
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (t/ha)
Mean
rank
6
2
1
3
4
5
8
7
Mean
%
98
105
113
102
101
101
89
96
2.735
rank
5
3
1
4
2
7
8
6
Mean
%
99
101
108
100
103
96
92
97
2.387
Yield
Rank
0.90802 0.857143
0.8245 0.734694
Correlations
R²=
MSF
t/ha
2.370
2.411
2.583
2.386
2.450
2.280
2.191
2.312
2.387
9.770
0.47
Linear regression
P (0.05) =0.0018
2.700
2.600
2
600
y = 0.5615x + 0.8311
R² = 0.8245
MSF yields
2.500
2.400
2.300
2.200
2.100
2.000
1.900
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
NVT yields
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 12
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Durum Demonstration Trials
Caparoi
Hyperno
Saintly
Tamaroi
Tjilkuri
WID 803
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
cv
mean
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn
WUE (kg/mm)
Evap (mm)
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Yield
(t/ha)
2.666
2.656
2.377
2.339
2.487
2.701
2.538
0.332
7.1
MSF
Rank
2
3
5
6
4
1
%
mean
105
105
94
92
98
106
P = 0.415
13
2.538
7-May
261
60
16.6
108 SL
Yield
(t/ha)
2.117
1.871
1.896
1.843
2.137
2.274
2.023
0.303
8.1
Waikerie
Rank
3
5
4
6
2
1
%
mean
105
92
94
91
106
112
P = 0.082
15
2.023
7-May
229
60
15.4
98 SL
Page 13
Yield
(t/ha)
2.392
2.264
2.137
2.091
2.312
2.488
2.280
0.270
7.5
E
G*E
2.280
GXE Mean
Rank
2
4
5
6
3
1
%
mean
105
99
94
92
101
109
P = 0.010
12
P = 0.003
P = 0.381
Yield Correlations
Waikerie
MSF
0.61051
17 February 2011
2010 Durum Demo Trials
3.000
Waikerie
MSFP
2.500
Yield (t/ha)
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
Caparoi
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Hyperno
Saintly
Tamaroi
Page 14
Tjilkuri
WID 803
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Durum Demo Trials
Mallee
3.000
2.500
Yield (t/ha)
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
Caparoi
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Hyperno
Saintly
Tamaroi
Page 15
Tjilkuri
WID 803
17 February 2011
Financial analysis
2010 Waikerie Durum Variety Demo Trial
Variety
Caparoi
Hyperno
Saintly
Tamaroi
Tjilkuri
WID 803
Mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Grade
DR1
DR1
DR1
DR1
DR1
DR1
Yield
t/ha
2.117
1.871
1.896
1.843
2.137
2.274
2.023
0.303
8.1
Rank
3
5
4
6
2
1
%
Mean
105
92
94
91
106
112
Protein
Scrn
TW
10.4
9.2
9.3
10.3
9.8
9.1
9.7
1.4
2.8
3.1
2.8
3.2
5.0
3.0
85.2
83.2
82.0
85.2
83.0
84.4
83.8
%
Mean
105
105
94
92
98
106
Protein
Scrn
TW
9.9
9.1
8.6
10.1
10.0
9.0
9.5
1.2
2.2
1.7
1.9
1.9
3.5
2.1
85.6
83.0
82.8
84.8
84.2
83.4
84.0
Pay
Grade
DR3
FED1
FED1
DR3
FED1
FED1
$/tonne
Pay
Grade
FED1
FED1
FED1
DR3
DR3
FED1
$/tonne
230.60
200.00
200.00
230.60
200.00
200.00
$/ha
488.12
374.29
379.29
425.07
427.47
454.87
Rank
1
6
5
4
3
2
diff
from top
0.00
-113.83
-108.83
-63.05
-60.65
-33.25
P = 0.082
MSF Durum Variety Demo Trial
Variety
Caparoi
Hyperno
Saintly
Tamaroi
Tjilkuri
WID 803
Mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Grade
DR1
DR1
DR1
DR1
DR1
DR1
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Yield
t/ha
2.666
2.656
2.377
2.339
2.487
2.701
2.538
0.332
7.1
Rank
2
3
5
6
4
1
200.00
200.00
200.00
230.60
230.60
200.00
$/ha
533.25
531.18
475.50
539.35
573.47
540.13
Rank
4
5
6
3
1
2
diff
from top
-40.21
-42.29
-97.97
-34.11
0.00
-33.33
P = 0.415
Page 16
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Durum by Seeding Point Trial
WID 801 Knife
WID 801 T boot
WID 802 Knife
WID 802 T boot
WID 803 Knife
WID 803 T boot
Yitpi Knife
Yitpi T boot
Mean
Lsd (0.05)
CV %
Yield
(t/ha)
2.751
2.817
2.986
3.303
3.250
3.043
2.812
2.582
2.943
0.367
7.1
mean
2.943
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn
WUE (kg/mm)
Evap (mm)
7
5
4
1
2
3
6
8
%
mean
93
96
101
112
110
103
96
88
0.0096
12
7-May
261
60
19.2
108 SL
WID 801
WID 802
WID 803
Yitpi
Mean
Lsd (0.05)
Yield
(t/ha)
2.784
3.145
3.146
2.697
2.943
0.273
Knife
T boot
Mean
Lsd (0.05)
Yield
(t/ha)
2.949
2.936
2.943
0.193
Yitpi
T boot
2.697
2.936
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
MSF
Rank
Rank
b
a
a
b
%
Yitpi
103
117
117
100
0.0044
9
Rank
a
a
%
T boot
100
100
0.8859
7
Page 17
17 February 2011
2010 Time of seeding by Variety Demonstration Trials
Waikerie
Axe
Gladius
Yitpi
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
Yield
(kg/ha)
2.168
2.485
2.502
2.385
0.174
TOS 1
TOS 2
TOS 3
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
tos*var
cv (%)
2.306
2.642
2.206
2.385
0.240
Sow dates
TOS 1
TOS 2
TOS 3
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP
WUE (kg/mm)
WUE
kg/mm
14.4
16.5
16.6
b
a
a
P = 0.001
7
WUE
kg/ha
15.3
17.5
14.6
b
a
b
Karoonda
%
mean
91
104
105
P = 0.010
P = 0.001
%
mean
97
111
93
10
8.5
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
2.241
2.254
1.635
2.043
0.513
WUE
kg/mm
9.1
9.0
9.3
a
a
a
P = 0.459
6
WUE
kg/ha
10.0
10.1
7.3
a
a
b
%
mean
100
98
102
P = 0.041
P = 0.013
%
mean
110
110
80
25
6.8
14-Apr
5-May
7-Jun
TOS 1
TOS 2
TOS 3
261
58
15.8
0.436
0.0924212
Yield
(kg/ha)
2.038
2.010
2.082
2.043
0.120
26-May
16-Jun
1-Jul
333.5
58
9.1
33
4.71429
0.618
0.288493
Page 18
Evap rate
110
15
17 February 2011
Time of Seeding, Karoonda, 2010
Grain yield (t/ha)
2.800
2.400
2.000
1.600
Axe
1.200
Gladius
0.800
Yitpi
0.400
26/05/2010
9/06/2010
23/06/2010
Time of Sowing
Grain yield (t/ha)
Time of Seeding, MSF, 2010
3.000
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
Axe
Gladius
Yitpi
Time of Sowing
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 19
17 February 2011
Financial analysis
Karoonda Time of Seeding by Variety Trial, 2010
Variety
Axe 1
Axe 2
Axe 3
Gladius 1
Gladius 2
Gladius 3
Yitpi 1
Yitpi 2
Yitpi 3
Mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Grade
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
Yield
t/ha
2.147
2.262
1.704
2.115
2.324
1.591
2.460
2.174
1.611
2.043
0.120
6.8
Rank
5
3
7
6
2
9
1
4
8
%
Mean
105
111
83
104
114
78
120
106
79
WUE
kg/hL
9.6
10.1
7.6
9.5
10.4
7.1
11.0
9.7
7.2
9.1
Protein
Scrn
TW
11.2
11.1
10.9
11.2
11.5
11.3
11.4
11.2
11.2
11.2
1.9
1.8
2.8
2.2
4.7
4.7
3.2
1.8
2.5
2.8
78.3
75.2
75.6
76.0
76.4
75.8
77.4
77.0
75.4
76.3
Protein
Scrn
TW
12.8
12.6
11.8
11.5
12.0
11.9
10.3
11.0
11.6
11.7
2.1
2.8
2.1
3.5
2.4
3.9
6.3
5.7
3.0
3.5
75.6
74.4
74.8
76.4
76.6
75.2
78.2
78.4
78.2
76.4
Pay
Grade
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
$/tonne
$/ha
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
450.95
475.08
357.78
444.15
487.98
334.11
516.64
456.62
338.33
Pay
Grade
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
$/tonne
$/ha
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
391.71
488.54
485.37
500.81
578.24
486.30
560.47
597.47
418.09
Costs
fert
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
$
Return
410.35
434.48
317.18
403.55
447.38
293.51
476.04
416.02
297.73
Rank
Costs
fert
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
40.60
$
Return
351.11
447.94
444.77
460.21
537.64
445.70
519.87
556.87
377.49
Rank
5
3
7
6
2
9
1
4
8
diff
from top
-65.69
-41.56
-158.87
-72.49
-28.66
-182.53
0.00
-60.02
-178.31
P = 0.459
MSF Time of Seeding by Variety Trial, 2009
Variety
Axe 1
Axe 2
Axe 3
Gladius 1
Gladius 2
Gladius 3
Yitpi 1
Yitpi 2
Yitpi 3
Mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Grade
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
Yield
t/ha
1.865
2.326
2.311
2.385
2.754
2.316
2.669
2.845
1.991
2.385
0.174
8.520
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Rank
9
5
7
4
2
6
3
1
8
%
Mean
78
98
97
100
115
97
112
119
83
WUE
kg/hL
12.4
15.4
15.3
15.8
18.2
15.3
17.7
18.8
13.2
15.8
9
5
7
4
2
6
3
1
8
diff
from top
-205.76
-108.93
-112.10
-96.66
-19.24
-111.17
-37.00
0.00
-179.38
P = 0.001
Page 20
17 February 2011
2010 Time of seeding by Nutrition Demonstration Trial
Karoonda
+50 Urea
-50 Urea
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
Yield
(kg/ha)
2.504
1.912
2.208
1.452
TOS 1
TOS 2
TOS 3
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
cv (%)
2.497
2.126
2.000
2.208
1.452
23.7
+50 Urea
mean
2.504
2.208
Sow dates
TOS 1
TOS 2
TOS 3
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn)
WUE (kg/mm)
Evap rate
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
a
a
WUE
kg/mm
11.2
8.6
NS (P<0.05)
a
a
a
%
+50 Urea
100
76
66
WUE
kg/ha
11.2
9.5
9.0
NS (P<0.05)
%
mean
113
96
91
66
26-May
16-Jun
7-Jun
333.5
58
9.9
110
Page 21
17 February 2011
2010 Variety by Seeding Rate Demonstration Trials
Variety
% Mean
WUE
kg/ha
a
b
104
96
23.0
21.2
P = 0.0051
5
c
bc
ab
a
ab
% Mean
91
97
102
106
104
P = 0.0103
8
cd
bcd
ab
a
a
d
bcd
bcd
abc
bcd
%
Mean
94
99
106
110
111
88
95
99
101
97
P = 0.7372
12
Yield kg/ha
Gladius
Peake
Mean
lsd (P<0.05)
2.736
2.529
2.632
0.137
Rate (kg/ha)
25
40
55
70
95
Mean
lsd (P<0.05)
Variety by Rate
Gladius 25
Gladius 40
Gladius 55
Gladius 70
Gladius 95
Peake 25
Peake 40
Peake 55
Peake 70
Peake 95
Mean
lsd (P<0.05)
2.402
2.552
2.690
2.784
2.732
2.632
0.216
2.479
2.596
2.788
2.903
2.914
2.325
2.508
2.593
2.666
2.551
2.632
0.305
WUE
kg/ha
20.2
21.4
22.6
23.4
23.0
WUE
kg/ha
20.8
21.8
23.4
24.4
24.5
19.5
21.1
21.8
22.4
21.4
2.6321
Mean
2.6321
Mean
2.6321
Mean
Seeding rate by Variety
Grain yield (t/ha)
3.000
2.900
2.800
2.700
2.600
2.500
Gladius
2.400
Peake
2.300
2.200
25
40
55
70
95
Seeding rate (kg/ha)
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 22
17 February 2011
2010 Variety by Seeding Rate Demonstration Trials
SR by Variety
Yield (kg/ha)
3.000
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
Gladius
Peake
Wheat Variety
SR by Variety
Gladius
Peake
Yield (kg/ha)
3.500
3.000
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
25
40
55
70
95
Seeding rates (kg/ha)
SR by Variety
Yield (kg/ha)
3.500
3.000
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
Wheat Variety by SR
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 23
17 February 2011
Waikerie Wheat Seeding Rate by Variety Trial 2010
Financial Analysis
Variety
Gladius 25
Gladius 40
Gladius 55
Gladius 70
Gladius 95
Peake 25
Peake 40
Peake 55
Peake 70
Peake 95
Mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Prices
Grade
H1
H1
H1
H1
H1
H1
H1
H1
H1
H1
Yield
t/ha
2.479
2.596
2.788
2.903
2.914
2.325
2.508
2.593
2.666
2.551
2.632
0.305
6.8
01-December-2010
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Rank
9
5
3
2
1
10
8
6
4
7
%
Mean
94
99
106
110
111
88
95
99
101
97
Protein
Scrn
TW
TKW
9.9
10.4
10.0
10.1
10.2
9.2
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.7
5.7
4.7
4.5
4.7
4.4
7.1
6.8
7.9
6.6
6.6
5.9
83.4
84.8
84.0
84.2
84.6
83.8
83.8
84.2
83.6
84.4
84.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pay
Grade
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
ASW1
$/tonne
$/ha
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
258.00
639.50
669.74
719.28
748.97
751.68
599.72
647.12
668.92
687.72
658.24
diff
from top
-112.18
-81.94
-32.40
-2.71
0.00
-151.96
-104.57
-82.77
-63.96
-93.45
P = 0.7372
Pool
Port Adelaide
Page 24
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee Cladium/Mycorrhiza Trials
Ctrl - pam
Ctrl + pam
Clad - pam
Clad + pam
Vam - pam
Vam + pam
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
cv
Yield
(t/ha)
2.450
2.451
2.448
2.437
2.442
2.403
2.438
0.129
4.4
mean
2.438
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn)
110 WUE (kg/mm)
Control
Cladium
Vam
-pam
+pam
MSF
Rank
2
1
3
5
4
6
%
mean
100
101
100
100
100
99
P = 0.978
5
Ctrl - pam
Ctrl + pam
Clad - pam
Clad + pam
Vam - pam
Vam + pam
mean
max
min
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
4
6
3
2
1
5
%
mean
99
94
103
103
107
95
P = 0.358
13
% mean
100
100
99
100
100
wue
20.6
20.5
20 4
20.4
20.6
20.4
1.375
1.466
1 440
1.440
1.465
1.389
Scrn
1.24
1.46
1.62
1.24
1.86
1.96
1.56
1.96
1.24
Yield
(t/ha)
2.798
2.741
2.913
2.891
2.964
2.885
2.865
0.177
5.2
TW
76.2
76.2
76.2
76.0
76.4
76.4
76.2
76.4
76.0
5
6
2
3
1
4
%
mean
98
96
102
101
103
101
P = 0.066
6
Yield
(t/ha)
2.219
2.177
2.275
2.266
2.309
2.215
2.244
0.092
6.2
GXE Mean
Rank
4
6
2
3
1
5
%
mean
99
97
101
101
103
99
P = 0.023
4
%
98
101
101
101
99
wue
16.2
16.7
16 7
16.7
16.7
16.4
2.244
7-May
236
75
22.7
% mean
96
103
101
103
97
wue
6.1
6.5
64
6.4
6.5
6.2
2.769
2.902
2 924
2.924
2.892
2.839
Karoonda
Protein
12.3
12.6
12.3
12.5
12.6
12.5
12.5
12.6
12.3
Peebinga
Rank
2.865
7-May
334
75
6.4
MSF
TW
84.0
83.4
84.2
84.0
83.8
84.0
83.9
84.2
83.4
Karoonda
Rank
1.427
7-May
229
75
20.5
2.450
2.443
2 422
2.422
2.447
2.430
Yield
(t/ha)
1.410
1.340
1.463
1.469
1.522
1.357
1.427
0.185
10.9
Scrn
1.38
1.43
1.44
1.43
1.41
1.80
1.48
1.80
1.38
% mean
97
101
102
101
99
wue
22.0
23.0
23 2
23.2
22.9
22.5
2.198
2.270
2 262
2.262
2.268
2.219
Peebinga
Protein
9.4
9.0
8.8
8.8
9.5
9.2
9.1
9.5
8.8
TW
81.4
81.0
81.2
81.8
81.2
82.0
81.4
82.0
81.0
Scrn
2.38
2.81
2.17
2.23
2.61
2.69
2.48
2.81
2.17
Page 25
Protein
9.9
10.0
9.9
9.9
9.5
9.9
9.9
10.0
9.5
17 February 2011
Stoeckel's, Paringa
EM38 Wheat variety by Fertiliser rate trial, 2010
Financial Analysis -Yield and Quality
Variety
Strip
Trt
Gladius
1
Gladius
1
Gladius
1
Gladius
2
Gladius
2
Gladius
2
Gladius
3
Gladius
3
Gladius
3
Gladius
4
Gladius
4
Gladius
4
Gladius
5
Gladius
5
Gladius
5
Gladius
6
Gladius
6
Gladius
6
Gladius
7
Gladius
7
Gladius
7
Gladius
8
Gladius
8
Gladius
8
Gladius
9
Gladius
9
Gladius
9
Mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
Low seed
Low seed
Low seed
Control
Control
Control
Late sow
Late sow
Late sow
High fert
High fert
High fert
No fert
No fert
No fert
Post Urea
Post Urea
Post Urea
Low fert
Low fert
Low fert
No zinc
No zinc
No zinc
Copper
Copper
Copper
TE
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
-Zn
-Zn
-Zn
+Zn
+Zn
+Zn
Seed
42
42
42
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
Fert
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
60
60
60
0
0
0
45
45
45
30
30
30
45
45
45
45
45
45
Trt
Yield
1.587
1.489
1.807
1.593
1.457
1.890
1.467
1.466
1.514
Zone
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Rise
Mid slope
Flat
Yield
t/ha
1.703
1.695
1.055
1.614
1.600
1.046
1.821
1.981
1.467
1.744
1.713
1.025
1.526
1.600
1.056
2.121
1.960
1.213
1.556
1.600
1.067
1.565
1.573
1.018
1.588
1.611
1.150
1.560
Area
(ha)
2.8
2.0
1.3
0.8
0.9
0.4
1.8
1.5
0.8
1.9
1.6
0.9
1.8
1.5
0.9
3.0
2.2
1.1
1.9
1.6
0.9
2.6
2.2
1.1
1.9
1.5
0.8
SD
0.086
0.161
0.130
0.082
0.186
0.229
0.056
0.147
0.201
0.077
0.164
0.149
0.134
0.207
0.205
0.111
0.176
0.162
0.115
0.189
0.190
0.086
0.198
0.159
0.133
0.199
0.193
0.195
Rank
7
8
24
9
12
25
4
2
19
5
6
26
18
12
23
1
3
20
17
11
22
16
15
27
14
10
21
WUE
kg/mm
10.4
10.3
6.4
9.8
9.8
6.4
11.1
12.1
8.9
10.6
10.5
6.3
9.3
9.8
6.4
12.9
12.0
7.4
9.5
9.8
6.5
9.5
9.6
6.2
9.7
9.8
7.0
Protein
9.0
10.3
11.7
9.2
10.5
11.9
8.4
9.4
10.9
9.4
10.5
11.1
8.8
8.9
10.6
10.2
10.2
11.7
8.6
8.7
11.3
8.9
8.6
10.3
8.8
10.3
12.1
10.0
Scrn
0.4
0.5
1.1
0.4
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.5
1.0
0.7
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
1.1
0.7
P < 0.001
Treatment
DAP 0
DAP 30
DAP 45
DAP 60
Low Seed
Late Sow
Post Urea
No Zinc
Copper
Yield Protein
1.457 9.4
1.467 9.5
1.489 10.5
1.593 10.3
1.587 10.3
1.807 9.6
1.890 10.7
1.466 9.3
1.514 10.4
Scrn
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.8
TW
72.9
72.7
72.6
73.0
72.4
73.7
73.8
72.6
72.7
WUE
8.5
8.6
8.7
9.1
9.1
10.7
10.8
8.5
8.8
GM
304.87
286.56
281.24
288.05
294.37
346.46
366.55
278.13
281.90
Zone
Sandhill
Mid-slope
Flat
Yield Protein
1.524 8.1
1.533 8.7
1.010 10.2
Scrn
0.50
0.54
0.85
TW
65.2
65.8
65.9
WUE
9.3
9.4
6.2
GM
325.80
328.01
205.78
2010 Mallee Cereal Trial Results.xlsx
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
GSR
Jan-Mar
WUE (kg/mm)
Evap rate
246
83.8
9.5
110
Stoeckel
Page 26
27.9
TW
72.4
72.6
72.2
72.2
73.2
72.4
72.4
74.0
74.8
72.4
73.8
72.8
72.4
73.0
73.4
73.2
73.0
75.2
72.4
72.6
73.0
72.6
72.2
73.0
72.4
73.4
72.2
72.9
Pay
Grade
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
Feed1
farm gate
$/tonne
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
210.00
$/ha
$/ha
Return Fert cost
357.70
33.75
356.05
33.75
221.45
33.75
339.00
33.75
336.00
33.75
219.69
33.75
382.42
33.75
416.06
33.75
308.00
33.75
366.33
45.00
359.80
45.00
215.25
45.00
320.53
0.00
336.00
0.00
221.67
0.00
445.42
33.75
411.60
33.75
254.63
33.75
326.67
22.50
336.00
22.50
224.00
22.50
328.73
29.75
330.27
29.75
213.82
29.75
333.38
35.75
338.33
35.75
241.50
35.75
Av.
Max
%
$/ha
from top
GM
diff
323.95
79
322.30
78
187.70
46
305.25
74
302.25
73
185.94
45
348.67
85
382.31
93
274.25
67
321.33
78
314.80
76
170.25
41
320.53
78
336.00
82
221.67
54
411.67
100
377.85
92
220.88
54
304.17
74
313.50
76
201.50
49
298.98
73
300.52
73
184.07
45
297.63
72
302.58
74
205.75
50
286.53
411.67
GM
income
strip
zone
294.37
907.06
644.59
244.02
281.24
244.20
272.03
74.38
346.46
627.61
573.47
219.40
288.05
610.53
503.68
153.23
304.87
576.95
504.00
199.50
366.55 1235.01
831.27
242.96
286.56
577.92
501.60
181.35
278.13
777.35
661.15
202.48
281.90
565.49
453.88
164.60
mm
mm
mm
page 42
17 February 2011
2010 Stoeckel Comparison of Variable Rate fertiliser versus Flat rate
West Chamberlain
Zone
Sandhill
Mid slope
Flat
Zones created with Your Soils Potential on 2008 EM 38 map
Yield
Flat
Variable
1.614
2.121
1.600
1.713
1.046
1.056
Area
16.0
97.8
23.2
137.0
Fertiliser Rate (kg/ha)
Flat
Variable
DAP
DAP
Urea
45
45
90
45
60
0
45
0
0
Comparison Variable Rate - Flat Rate
Difference in Grain
19.394 tonne
Difference in Fertiliser
1.864 tonne
Income over 137 ha
GM $/ha
Total Fertiliser used (t)
Flat
Variable
DAP
DAP
Urea
0.7
0.7
1.4
4.4
5.9
0
1.0
0.0
0
6.2
6.6
1.4
Inputs
Wheat
Feed1
$210.00
Fertiliser
$750.00
$0.75
Gross Income $
Flat
Variable
5422.23
7124.94
32856.83 35176.47
5088.56
5138.00
43367.62 47439.42
Gross Margins $/ha
Flat
Variable
338.91
445.33
335.97
359.69
219.63
221.76
Urea
$500.00
$0.50
$4,071.80
$29.72
Daily cash price 1/12/2010
Simple Gross Margin per ha = $29.72
If the results are applied over the whole paddock VR would grow
19.394 t more grain than Flat Rate using 1.864 t more fertiliser
more
more
more
less
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Page 27
17 February 2011
2010 Mallee SeedHawk Demonstration Trial
MSF
Pressure
Rise - High
Rise - Normal
Rise - Low
Midslope - High
Midslope - Normal
Midslope - Low
Flat - High
Flat - Normal
Flat - Low
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Yield
(t/ha)
1.056
1.311
1.389
2.000
2.333
1.794
1.950
2.039
1.794
1.741
0.464
11.6
mean
1.741
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn)
WUE (kg/mm)
d
d
cd
ab
a
bc
ab
ab
bc
%
mean
61
75
80
115
134
103
112
117
103
P = 0.255
27
7-May
229
60
14.6
Evap
110
MSF
Land Type
Rise
Midslope
Flat
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Yield
(t/ha)
1 252
1.252
2.043
1.928
1.741
0.268
11.6
Midslope
2.043
Pressure
High
Normal
Low
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
CV %
Yield
(t/ha)
1.669
1.894
1.659
1.741
0.268
11.6
Normal
1.894
b
a
a
%
Midslope
61
100
94
P < 0.001
15
MSF
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
a
a
a
%
Normal
88
100
88
P = 0.133
15
Page 28
17 February 2011
2010 SeedHawk Trial, MSF
2.500
2.000
Yield (t/ha)
1.500
1.000
Rise
0.500
Midslope
Flat
0.000
Hgh
Normal
Low
Tyne Pressure
Land Type
2.500
Yield (t/ha)
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
Rise
Midslope
Flat
Pressure
2.000
Yield (t/ha)
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000
High
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Normal
Page 29
Low
17 February 2011
2010 Trace Element Demonstration Trial
MSF
Trt's
Control
Cu + pam
Cu - pam
Mn + pam
Mn - pam
Zn + pam
Zn - pam
ZnCuMn + pam
ZnCuMn - pam
mean
Lsd (P<0.05)
cv
Yield
(t/ha)
1.000
0.730
0.794
0.858
0.875
1.057
0.871
0.908
0.880
0.886
0.151
9.8
mean
0.886
Sowing date
A-O rainfall
Fertiliser (DAP +Zn)
110 WUE (kg/mm)
ab
c
bc
bc
a
bc
bc
abc
2
9
8
7
5
1
6
3
4
P = 0.015
%
mean
113
82
90
97
99
119
98
102
99
17
7-May
333.5
75
4.0
Treatment
Control
Cu
Mn
Zn
ZnCu Mn
mean
MSF
Yield
(t/ha)
1.000
0.762
0.866
0.964
0.894
0.886
+pam
- pam
Control
mean
0.592
0.855
1.000
0.886
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Rank
Rank
1
5
4
2
3
%
mean
113
86
98
109
101
3
2
1
67
97
113
Page 30
17 February 2011
Variety
Control
Cu + pam
Cu - pam
Mn + pam
Mn - pam
Zn + pam
Zn - pam
ZnCuMn + pam
ZnCuMn - pam
Mean
Max
Min
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
Protein
9.8
10.2
10.5
10.1
9.6
10.2
10.1
10.1
10.3
10.1
10.5
9.6
Scrn %
0.8
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
0.8
Page 31
TW
75.6
75.4
75.4
75.0
75.2
75.6
75.6
75.8
76.0
75.5
76.0
75.0
TKW
17 February 2011
Trace Elements
1.200
1.000
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.000
Trace Treatments
1.200
1.000
0.800
0.600
0 400
0.400
0.200
0.000
Control
Cu
Mn
Zn
ZnCu Mn
Pam
0.900
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
+pam
2010 SA MSF Trial Results
‐ pam
Page 32
17 February 2011