UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before The
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20266-0001
Postal Rate and Fee Changes,
2000
Docket No. R2000-1
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRITTEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
PROVIDED BY WITNESSES RESPONDING AFTER THEIR APPEARANCE
AND BY PARTICIPANTS RESPONDING AS AN INSTITUTION
(August 16, 2000)
Pursuant
to the Presiding
Consumer
Advocate
responding
to interrogatories
examination
(including
participants
responding
(“OCA”)
Officer’s
Ruling No. R2000-l/105,
hereby designates
and other questions
answers
to questions
as an institution,
the following
the Office of the
answers
of witnesses
after their appearance
for oral-cross-
posed during oral examination)
all as the written
and by
cross-examination
of the
OCA to be included into the record of this proceeding.
The following
questions
questions
answers
of witnesses
after their appearance
responding
to interrogatories
for oral cross-examination
posed during oral examination)
are designated
(including
and other
answers
to
for inclusion in the record.
United States Postal Service
1.
Witness
ST44-II(a)
responses
Patelunas
and
(ST-44)
(c)
Interrogatories
(revised
filed August
6/11/00),
9, 2000
and Questions:
35-39,
to questions
40(a)-(i),
posed
OCAIUSPS42,
46-50;
at hearing
Tr.
Docket No. R2000-1
2
35116779,
responses
Tr. 35116785,
filed August 14, 2000 to questions
35116791-92,
35116782-83,
posed at hearing
and 35/16786,
response
filed
August 14, 2000 to question posed at July 26, 2000 technical conference;
2.
Witness Mayo (T-39) Interrogatory:
3.
Witness Tayman (T-9):
OCAIUSPS-T39-5
responses
(Erratum);
filed June 8, 2000, to questions
posed
at hearing Tr. 1114522 and Tr. 12/4921.
E-Stamo Corp.
1.
Witness Jones (T-l) Interrogatories:
OCAIE-Stamp-Tl-2-4
and 6.
Stamps.com
1.
Witness Kuhr (T-2) Interrogatories:
The following
institutional
responses
OCAIStampscom-T2-I,
3-5 and 7.
of the Postal Service are designated
for
inclusion in the record:
United States Postal Service
1.
OCA Interrogatories:
OCALJSPS-8
129-148; OCALISPS-T24-6(e)
MMA Interrogatory:
3.
Revised
response
February
10, 2000)
120,
redirected from witness Miller; OCAIUSPS-
ST44-4, 8, 1 l(e), 12, 33, 34, 40(j)-(k)
2.
(revised
redirected from witness Patelunas;
MMA/USPS-ST44-7(b)
and (c) (revised 8/l I/00);
of USPS to POIR No. 14, Item 2(b) and (e) (revised
8/l 1100);
4.
Response
filed July 14, 2000, to Commissioner
at hearing at Tr. 2219789-91;
Goldway’s
question posed
_
3
Docket No. R2000-1
5.
Response
filed August
11, 2000, to Chairman
Gleiman’s
question
posed
Gleiman’s
question
posed
at hearing at Tr. 35/16830;
6.
Response
filed August
15, 2000, to Chairman
at hearing at Tr. 35/16813 and 16885-66;
7.
Response
filed August
14, 2000, to question
posed
at July 26, 2000
technical conference.
Pitnev Bowes
1.
OCA/PB-Tl-3
and 5 redirected from witness Martin.
Respectfully
submitted,
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER
ADVOCATE
Director
Office of the Consumer Advocate
KENNETH
Attorney
1333 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
(202) 789-6830; Fax (202) 789-6819
E. RICHARDSON
CERTIFICATE
I hereby
participants
OF SERVICE
certify that I have this date served the foregoing
of record in this proceeding
Practice.
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
August 16,200O
in accordance
document
upon all
with Section 12 of the Rules of