BEFORE THE POSTAL RATE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20268-0001 Docket No. R2000-1 Postal Rate and Fee Changes, 2000 INITIAL BRIEF OF AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION David M. Levy Christopher T. Shenk Sidley & Austin 1722 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 7368000 [email protected] Counsel for American Library September 13, 2000 BEFORE THE POSTAL RATE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20268-0001 Docket No. R2000-1 Postal Rate and Fee Changes, 2000 INITIAL BRIEF OF AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION The American Library Association (“ALA”) respectfully submits its initial post-trial brief. ALA is a 501 (c) charitable voice of America’s ship promoting defended intellectual ans, membership friends of libraries. and information freedom. Although Sheketoff (ALA-T-l) ‘of the highest proposed by the Postal Service for in the costs attributed in Docket in Docket No. R97-1 forced the Commission contemplated by the of approximately in Docket No. R94-1, and approximately over the library rates established the rate preference and vendors, and other led to an average rate increase library rate with its regular counterpart, quality, at 2 (28 Tr. 13391). In Docket No. R97-1, increases 14 percent over the levels established increases that serves as the most of its 59,000 members are librari- the rate increases Postal Service to the subclass 90 percent services also includes trustees, libraries, publishers, This brief concerns library rate mail. organization For more than a century, ALA has provided leader- libraries. library and educational the Standard by Congress Op. 8 Rec. Decis. (May 11, 1998) at m5726-45. No. R90-1. effectively (B) “book The rate to merge the rate, eliminating for library rate mail. See R97-1 In Docket No. R97-1, the Postal Service was unable to explain the causes of the enormous increases in attributable systems, and the Commission questionable.” found the Service’s cost estimates to be “highly R97-1 Op. & Rec. Decis. at lJj 5741, 5743. The Commission characterized its decision to recommend standard rates as a temporary opportunity expedient the merger of library and special intended to “offer the Postal Service an to focus special scrutiny on Library Mail with a view to developing permanent expectation causes of the anomalous been frustrated that the Service would identify the cause or in costs attributed in the present docket. average rate increase massive increases Service appears increases of 4.5 percent, above and beyond in the previous two omnibus to have developed in costs attributed to library rate mail have In this case, the Service is proposing for the subclass implemented a Id. at 15745. solution to the rate anomaly posed in this case.” The Commission’s escalation costs reported by the Service’s costing rate cases. an the The no better data the cause of the continued to library rate mail than in Docket Nos. R94-1 or R97-I. The further rate increases devastating proposed in this docket will only compound effects of the previous rate increases. The increases the implemented in Docket No. R94-1 and R97-1 have already caused the volume of mail entered at the library rate to plummet, as many libraries and publishers the book rate, or even to commercial have converted carriers like UPS. Sheketoff (ALA-T-l) to at 3 (28 Tr. 13394).Libraries modes and library programs of shipping-most notably that cannot the convert interlibrary loan programs that serve small and isolated rural communities-have hard hit, because postage costs represent 2 an enormous to these alternative and books-by-mail been especially percentage of their total Id. While an increase in the library postal rate will harm larger libraries, budget. the financial blow to smaller ones will be even greater. As the cost of shipping books to smaller libraries increases, the larger ones will have no choice but to cut back on the number of books sent to smaller libraries-many and isolated communities that are in the most need of books for education Perhaps the most vulnerable to increases elderly, physically disabled, and other individuals library loan and “Book by Mail” programs circulated through these vital information ment, eldercare, and other care-giving. In the present would establish with limited mobility. including on preventative rate preference large has proposed preference of five percent will provide little solace to America’s mail-continue The Commission to library rate mail-along has repeatedly audio manage- legislation that Moreover a rate libraries and their with other parcel and put the Postal Service on notice in recent of existing cost data for library rate mail, other and other subclasses ALA urges the-Commission of non-letter For this reason, by its costing systems to library rate mail will actually occur, and to reject claims of increasing able data or unsubstantiated mail. to hold the Postal Service to its burden of demon- strating that the costs attributed attribute and to outpace inflation. rate cases about the inadequacy small mail subclasses, citizens, of five percent for library rate mail. of the bill as law is by no means certain, however. flat-shaped print health care, financial Enactment if the costs attributed The inter- Id. at 4-5 (28 Tr. 13395-96) case, the Postal Service a permanent in the library rate are America’s are lifelines for housebound programs, books-provide patrons and Id. at 3-4 (28 Tr. 13394-95). recreation. Books of which serve poor guesswork. costs that rest merely on unreli- ALA also urges the Commission to library rate mail the costs of needless 3 manual not to or non-automated processing that would have been avoided by economical investment in automated equipment for processing and efficient levels of flats and parcels. U.S.C. § 3621. Respectfully submitted, David M. Levy Christopher T. Shenk Sidley & Austin 1722 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 7368000 [email protected] Counsel for American Library Association September 13,200O 4 See 39 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing participants of record in this proceeding in accordance Rules of Practice. September 13, 2000 5 document with section on all 12 of the
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz