oca-desig-t1.pdf

001445
BEFORE THE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20268~0601
nc;,EIVrL\j
,...
2 11 P;i “90
kg 24
,:,i
;:.;*
‘,i’,
,,
,.,‘,:
,,-; / / ! :
Mailing Online Service
Docket No. MC98-1
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRITTEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: LEE GARVEY (USPS-Tl)
(AUGUST 24, 1998)
Pursuant to the Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-l/3,
Consumer
Advocate
(OCA) hereby designates
witness Garvey as the written cross-examination
the Office of the
the following responses
of USPS
of the OCA, to be included in
the record of this proceeding.
1. OCA Interrogatories
Rothschild,
redirected
Tl-1-19,
22-29a, 30, T4-33 redirected
from witness
T5-3, T5-14 redirected from witness Plunkett and OCA-1-4
from the Postal Service.
2. DBP Interrogatories
Tl-l-11,
T5-4 redirected
from witness Plunkett and T7-2
redirected from witness Wilcox.
3. DFC Interrogatories
4. MASA Interrogatories
and T5-10 redirected
5. Response
Tl-1-6
and T5-2 redirected
Tl-l-11,
T3-2-3 redirected
from witness Plunkett.
from witness Stirewalt, T5-8
from witness Plunkett.
to POIR No. 1, Items I-5.
Respectfully
submitted,
EMMEl-f RAND COSTICH’
Acting Assistant Director
Office of the Consumer Advocate
001446
‘-
CERTFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing document
all participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
with section 12 of the
rules of practice.
EMMElT
Attorney
Washington, D.C.
August 24, 1998%
20268-0001
upon
RAND COSTICH
fJ5 c E,1~;’
‘; ,*I\
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20268-0001
Mailing Online Service
Al;g pj
3 41,
i”;j ‘$3
Dock$;,No:‘MC98-1
‘.
TV
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRIT-TEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: PAUL G. SECKAR (USPS-T-2)
(August 24, 1998)
Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-113 expressed
of each of the eight witnesses
cross-examination,
witnesses’
that time.
not scheduled
for oral
are to be received in evidence on August 26. Logically, all
The Office of the Consumer
Advocate
should also be received in evidence at
(OCA) therefore designates
of USPS witness Seckar as the written cross-examination
the
of the
OCA, to be included in the record of this proceeding:
1.
OCA-T2-1-9;
2.
DBP-T2-1-2.
3.
MASA-TZ1.
ony
the ruling provides that all eight
including the testimony of witnesses
answers to written cross-examination
following responses
the view that “the testi
offering direct evidence on behalf oft hap ostal Service is
in some way relevant to the market test.” Accordingly,
pieces of testimony,
:/
and OCA-T%Ib.-d.,
and f. (redirected
from witness Plunkett)
2, 3.a. and b., 4.~. and d., and 5 (re-numbered).
Respectfully
submitted,
Shelley S.“Dreifuss
Attorney
001456
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing
participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
upon all
with section 12 of the rules of
practice
Shelley S. Dreifuss
Attorney
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
August 24,1998
document
002.459
!?E2~j\f[~J!
BEFORE THE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHiNGTON,
D.C. 20268-0001
Mailing On Line Service
hG i!i
12 z5 p/i rz9
Cii~,
I” ,,”‘, :
Docket No. MC98-1
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRITTEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: DANIEL STIREWALT (USPS-T3)
(AUGUST 25,1998)
Pursuant to the Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-113, the Office of the
Consumer
Advocate
(OCA) hereby designates
witness Stirewalt as the written cross-examination
the following responses
of USPS
of the OCA, to be included in
the record of this proceeding.
1. OCA Interrogatories
2. MASA Interrogatories
T3-1-16.
T3-1 and 4-7.
Respectfully
submitted,
EMMETT RAND COSTICH
Acting Assistant Director
Office of the Consumer Advocate
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing document upon
all participants of record in this proceeding in accordance with section 12 of the
rules of oractice.
EMMETT RAND COSTICH
Attorney
Washington, D.C.
August 251998
20268-0001
OQl4@0
BEFORE THE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20268-0001
HCC~;:ir-!)
h
Mailing Online Service
25
12 24 iij,! aTg
Docket No. MC98-1
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRIT-TEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: BETH B. ROTHSCHILD (USPS-T-4)
(AUGUST 25, 1998)
Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-l/3
L.
of each of the eight witnesses
expressed
offering direct evidence on behalf of the Postal Service is
in some way relevant to the market test.” Accordingly,
pieces of testimony,
examination,
the ruling provides that all eight
including the testimony of witnesses
not scheduled
for oral cross-
are to be received in evidence on August 26. Logically, all witnesses’
answers to written cross-examination
The Office of the Consumer
responses
the view that “the testimony
should also be received in evidence at that time.
Advocate (OCA) therefore designates
the following
of USPS witness Rothschild as the written cross-examination
of the OCA, to
be included in the record of this proceeding:
1.
DBP Interrogatory
T4-1;
2.
MASA Interrogatories
3.
OCA Interrogatories
T4-14,
T5-9 redirected from witness Plunkett; and
T4-1-32, 34-35.
001461
Respectfully
KENNETH
Attorney
CERTIFICATE
submitted,
E. RICHARDSON
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing document
participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
with section 12 of the rules of
practice.
KENNETH
Attorney
Washington, D.C.
August 25,1gg8
20268-0001
upon all
E. RICHARDSON
001413
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20266-0001
R,:c.li’J;,,
~../
hc ZJ
Mailing Online Service
2 111p;; v&J
Docke#o.MC98-1
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRITTEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: MICHAEL K. PLUNKEl-f (USPS-T-5)
(AUGUST 24, 1998)
Pursuant to the Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-l/3,
Consumer
Advocate
(OCA) hereby designates
the Office of the
the following responses
witness Plunkett as the written cross-examination
of USPS
of the OCA, to be included in the
record of this proceeding.
1.
DBP Interrogatories
2.
DFC Interrogatory
3
MASA Interrogatories
Seckar;
4.
NAA Interrogatories
T5-1-4; and
5.
OCA Interrogatories
T5-1-2,4(A),
T5-1-3;
T5-1;
T5-1-7,
T2-3C, 4(A-B) redirected from witness
(E), 5-13, 15-27.
Respectfully
submitted,
KENNETH
E. RICHARD
,,,
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing document
participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
with section 12 of the rules of
practice.
’ KENNETH
Attorney
-
Washington, D.C.
August 24, 1998
20268-0001
upon all
E. RICHARDSON
001457
BEFORE THE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20268-0001
Mailing Online Service
~,.l~~,‘;‘~[,
auc 211
3 rr5 7)
“$3
Dockey,NoMC98-1
, ;
)
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRIT-FEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: JOHN HAMM (USPS-T-6)
(August 24, 1998)
Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-l/3
of each of the eight witnesses
expressed
offering direct evidence on behalf of the Postal Service is
in some way relevant to the market test.” Accordingly,
pieces of testimony,
cross-examination,
witnesses’
that time.
including the testimony
the ruling provides that all eight
of witnesses
not scheduled
The Office of the Consumer
Advocate
should also be received in evidence at
(OCA) therefore designates
of USPS witness Hamm as the written cross-examination
OCA, to be included in the record of this proceeding:
1.
OCA-TG-1-8.
2.
DBP-T6-2-3.
for oral
are to be received in evidence on August 26. Logically, all
answers to written cross-examination
following responses
the view that “the testimony
Respectfully
submitted,
Shelley S. Dreifuss
Attorney
”
the
of the
001458
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing
participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
upon all
with section 12 of the rules of
practice
Shelley S. Dreifuss
Attorney
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
August 24x1998
document
002449
BEFORE THE
r,~Et’~~:)
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC. 20268-000 iUG 24 3 $“j p; ‘$9
Mailing Online Service
)
;~yyo.
Mpal
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRITTEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: LINDA WILCOX (USPS-T-7)
(August 24, 1998)
Presiding Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-l/3
of each of the eight witnesses
expressed
offering direct evidence on behalf of the Postal Service is
in some way relevant to the market test.” Accordingly,
pieces of testimony,
cross-examination,
witnesses’
that time.
following
including the testimony
the ruling provides that all eight
of witnesses
not scheduled
The Office of the Consumer
Advocate
should also be received in evidence at
(OCA) therefore
OCA-T7-1-9.
2.
DBP-T7-1.
3.
DFC-T7-1-2
4.
MASA-T7-1
designates
of USPS witness Wilcox as the written cross-examination
OCA, to be included in the record of this proceeding:
1.
for oral
are to be received in evidence on August 26. Logically, all
answers to written cross-examination
responses
the view that “the testimony
(as amended).
Respectfully
submitted,
the
of the
001450
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing
participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
practice,
Attorney
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
August 24, 1998
document
upon all
with section 12 of the rules of
005451
BEFORE THE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20268-0001
Mailing Online Service
)
i’,~~;,Ep:J:!~
..
biic 24
D$$$‘Jo:
3 I1,r p;/ “~8
MC?-1
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
DESIGNATION OF WRITTEN CROSS-EXAMINATION
TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITNESS: FRANK E. CAMPANELLI (USPS-T-8)
(August 24, 1998)
Presiding
Officer’s Ruling No. MC98-l/3
of each of the eight witnesses
expressed
offering direct evidence on behalf of the Postal Service is
in some way relevant to the market test.” Accordingly,
pieces of testimony,
cross-examination,
witnesses’
that time.
following
the view that “the testimony
including the testimony
the ruling provides that all eight
of witnesses
not scheduled
are to be received in evidence on August 26. Logically, all
answers to written cross-examination
The Office of the Consumer
responses
Advocate
of USPS witness Campanelli
should also be received in evidence at
(OCA) therefore designates
OCA-T8-1
2.
DBP-TB-1-2
3.
MASA-T8-1.
and 3-11.
and 4-5
Respectfully
Attorney
the
as the written cross-examination
the OCA, to be included in the record of this proceeding:
1.
for oral
submitted,
of
001452
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing
participants
of record in this proceeding
in accordance
Attorney
Washington, D.C. 20268-0001
August 24, 1998
-
document
upon all
with section 12 of the rules of