II SPECIAL SERVICES REFORM, 1996 Docket No. MC96-3 RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO INTERROGATORY OF NASHUA PHOTO, INC. AND MYSTIC COLOR LAB (NM/USPS-X)) On September 23, 1996, the United States Postal Service filed a document which purported to include responses NM/USPS-8-11, 13-20, 22-27. The response document, to NM/USPS-20 but was inadvertently to the following Nashua/Mystic interrogatories: was intended to be filed as part of that omitted from the final version of the document which was filed with the Commission and from which service copies were made. The Postal Service regrets this oversight and files a copy of that response here. A copy of the response was sent by FAX to counsel for Nashua/Mystic/Seattle yesterday i?~the extent that a Motion For Late Acceptance to accompany is deemed necessary the instant tiling of the response to NM/USPS-20, invited to interpret the instant pleading as such a pleading. the Commission is L . RESPONSES OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO INTERROGATORIES OF NASHUA/MYSTIC NM/USPS-20. For purposes of your following assumptions: answer to this question, BRMAS mail purposes is of segregated generating please make the i. pre-barcoded stackers for customer; ii. a number of the sorter stackers contain a volume of mail just above the minimum level necessary to justify automated processing (i.e., the minimum level which you identified in the response to preceding interrogatory NM/USPS19); iii. is prepared and the mail is removed after the "bill" the mail must be "street" delivered sorter stacker, the low volume does not justify a plant carrier (i.e., by the customer); and iv. the carrier a DBCS or receives a CSBCS. non-BRM letter into ,a mail separate sorter INbill 11 for each presorted from the by the pick up on either Please describe fully how BRMAS mail is integrated with other including whether the BRMAS pieces are letter mail for delivery, sorted into route sequence on automated inserted manually, If the procedure differs or handled some other way. equipment, based on whether a DBCS or CSBCS is used, please explain fully. RESPONSE: It is expected either put or place tie it the the the out relay customer's that a bundle in BRMAS bundle as one bundle; container mail. and carrier receiving a sack in to with BRMAS mail be delivered the to mail for or place the bundle of deliver it with the the would the firm; firm BRMAS mail rest of and in the The interrogatory is stated verbatim and is followed by the response. Respectfully submitted, UNITED SWES POSTAIL SERVICE By its attorneys: Daniel J. Foucheaux, Jr. Chief Counsel, Ratemakiing ++J4hiLeJ@ Michael T Tidwell 475 CEnfant Plaza West, SW Washington, D.C. 20260-1137 (202) 268-2998; Fax -5402 September 25, 1996 . . , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing participants of record in this proceeding in accordance doc:ument upon all with section 12 of the Rules of Practice. 4-42fWQ Michael T Tidwell 475 CEnfant Plaza West, S.W Washington, D.C. 20260-1137 September 25, 1996
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz