int-oca-usps.pdf

ORIGINAL
BEFORE THE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
20268-0001
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Special
Services
Fees
Docket
and Classifications)
No.
MC96-3
OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE
INTERROGATORIES TO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
(OCA/USPS-57-64)
(August
28, 1996)
Pursuant
the
Postal
hereby
United
incorporated
sections
R,ate Commission,
submits
documents.
the
to
25 and 26 of
the
interrogatories
Instructions
States
Postal
Office
the
of
Rules
the
and requests
included
with
Service
dated
of
Practice
Consumer
for
Advocate
production
OCA Interrogatories
June
19,
1996,
GAIL WILLETTE
Director
Office
of the
are
submitted,
r
Consumer
DAVID RUDERMAN
Attorney
of
l-4
by reference.
Respectfully
of
Advocate
hereby
to
Docket
No.
MC96-3
OCA/USPS-57.
filed
a.
Please
with
Please
provide
the
on CD-ROM,
data
in
computer
a format
all
format
useable
by PC SAS.
System
"z
a form
data
tapes
OCA/USPS-21~.
This
differential
could
refer
for
TRACS
of
table
of
example,
for
the
employee
SSR-84
City
to
the
effects
cost
sampling
rates
within
provided
response
to
on weighting
within
rates
SSR-33
PC SAS.
rates
sampling
i-n a
Carrier
reference
attachment
sampling
differential
the
using
the
by PC SAS.
in
library
discusses
on these
be used
contained
be accessed
to
response
employee
was no mention
For
contained
can
sets
produced
that
Please
that
SAS data
file"
OCA/USPS-50.
the
the
and programs
provide
was in
in
to
Please
Cost
of
refer
SSR-84.
tapes
b.
2
There
pool.
in
a cost
pool
response
to
OCA/USPS-T5-13b.
a.
Please
provide
IOCS that
b.
defines
within
each
Please
define
stratum1
employee
complete
or
all
documentation
sampling
for
rates
used
pool.
the
sampling
design
and describes
cost
cost
sample
substrata
pool
sampled
rates
within
or
at
other
each
that
subparts
of
the
stratum
of
each
possible
or
cost
pool.
the
Docket
No.
MC96-3
OCA/USPS-59.
Please
assumptions
relied
assumption
of
Are
finance
"At
each
any
different
numbers
for
In
attachments
1 and
for
CAGs A/B
combined.
a.
Please
break
figures
for
Please
break
the
files
fourth
a.
for
Are
out
out
quarter?
sample
"A/B"
for
of
"A/B"
the
selection,
probability
regarding
strata?
the
row of
the
The
first
the
method
the
sample
of
sample."
the
selection
Please
response
design
J,
states
of
explain.
to
OCA/IJSPS-T5--13.
information
was provided
attachment
1 to
show
the
column
of
attachment
2 to
show
CAG A and CAG B separately.
of
TRACS Highway
the
to
the
of
an equal
refer
This
CAGs C through
certainty
A review
quarter
stage
within
17.
IOCS estimates.
assumptions
2,
page
CAG A and CAG B separately.
figures
OCA/USPS-61.
first
that
the
Please
SSR-90,
producing
CAG constitutes
OCA/USPS-60.
b.
to
the
assumes
in
there
refer
on for
states,
estimation
offices
3
SSR-82
and Rail
indicates
appear
that
program
to
be limited
to
cumulative
through
the
and data
the
FY 95.
PQ495 files
Please
actually
explain.
fourth
Docket
b.
C.
No.
MC96-3
Are
the
PQ495 programs
simply
for
the
other
in
Are
data
If
so,
Are
for
systems
please
data
the
and Rail
the
If
Please
finance
restructuring
to
Attachment
96 CAG A/B
certainty
a.
Did
1 to
finance
the
CRA auditor
If
not
investigate
the
numbers
please
or
reference?
for
of
FY 1995
the
TRACS
transportation
explain.
description
of
response
to
the
FY 1992
OCA/USPS-TS-13
The attachment
shows
that
included
in
the
FY 199!j
effects
of
the
finance
IOCS
provide
informed
advancements
the
from
certainty
the
estimates
the
between
results
FY 1993
of
and
any
studies.
CRA auditors
normal
FY 1995)
on cost
so,
investigations
the
the
were
restructuring
FY 1995?
Were
the
response.
numbers
TRACS Highway
library
quarters
please
in
the
of
sample.
number
b.
three
used
to
programs
one.
not,
refer
the
exp:!ain.
quarters
an MC96-3
first
systems
OCA/USPS-62.
and
in
of
Please
three
which
distribution?
number
FY 1995?
provided
for
illustrative
first
specify
files
Highway
cost
quarters
files
and Rail
d.
4
of
strata
FY 1995
that
(after
CAG rankings
excluded
IOCS certainty
restructuring
between
96 of
strata?
and
FY 1992
and
600 finance
If
so,
did
Docket
No.
they
MC96-3
produce
prepared,
of
finance
d.
a report
please
informed
C.
5
the
change
numbers,
please
CPA auditor
validity
of
the
the
in
coverage
by the
auditor's
OCA/USPS-63.
Please
list
and estimation
methodology
the
of
CPA that
were
not
strata
or
inlrestigate
underlying
evaluate
were
was
auditors
certainty
estimates
ever
a report
challenge
statistical
evaluated
If
why not.
routinely
CPA auditor
If
explain
the
component
change?
a copy.
underlying
such
this
provide
Dloes the
Does
of
the
statistical
designed,
CPA?
systems
maintained,
own firm?
the
If
so,
or
please
li.st
all
cases.
of
the
each
change
a.
Changes.in
b.
Changes
C.
all
between
This
implemented.
sample
in
stratum
universe
Changes
in
data
collected
d.
Changes
in
data
collection
e.
Changes
in
the
f.
Changes
in
weighting
editing
formulas,
should
size
size
by the
the
TFZACS sample
and
explain
coding
methodology
applicable).
1995
the
for
design
each
reason
for
include:
for
each
for
stage
each
of
stage
sampling.
of
sampling.
system.
instructions
or
if
in
FYs 1993
Please
TRACS system.
stratum
weighting
changes
of
or
manuals.
data.
(provide
old
and new
Docket
LT.
No.
MC963
Changes
in
estimation
in
variance
6
methodology,
and use
of
estimates
for
costing.
h.
Changes
new variance
OCA/USPS-64.
(SSR-1.2),
of
a.
pages
made to
edition
this
handbook
that
are
of
to
the
the
to
is
F-45
of
the
old
Handbook
F-45
F-45
dated
lists
January
FY 1995
other
the
1995
(provide
and
a summary
software.
entire
cover
edition
of
F-45
all
Handbook
January
section
provide
recent
most
applicable).
CODES/IOCS
cover
is
methodology
if
Handbood
needed
How often
the
This
the
please
not,
refer
v-vii.
This
If
b.
formulas,
Please
changes
estimation
data
editions
FY 1935
updated?
Handbook
1995.
co:Llection
of
this
data
collection
What
was the
F-45
Does
prior
to
year?
handbook
year.
date
of
January
3.995?
C.
Do the
changes
implemented
please
since
provide
document
instructions.
listed
all
on pages
the
additional
changes
v-vii
FY 1993
F-45
lists
of
implemented
cover
all
changes
instructions?
changes
since
the
necessary
If
not,
to
FY '1993 F-45
CERTIFICATE
I hereby
document
upon
accordance
certify
all
with
that
I have
participants
section
3.B(3)
OF SERVICE
this
date
of
record
of
the
special
4%&
Attorney
Washington,
August
28,
D.C.
1996
20268-0002
in
served
this
the
foregoing
proceeding
rules
of
in
practice.