02 INFORMATION ABOUT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/PROJECT DIRECTORS(PI/PD) and
co-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/co-PROJECT DIRECTORS
Submit only ONE copy of this form for each PI/PD and co-PI/PD identified on the proposal. The form(s) should be attached to the original
proposal as specified in GPG Section II.B. Submission of this information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. This information will
not be disclosed to external peer reviewers. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM WITH ANY OF THE OTHER COPIES OF YOUR PROPOSAL AS
THIS MAY COMPROMISE THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION.
PI/PD Name:
Douglas A Wiens
Gender:
Male
Female
Ethnicity: (Choose one response)
Hispanic or Latino
Race:
(Select one or more)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Hispanic or Latino
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Disability Status:
(Select one or more)
Hearing Impairment
Visual Impairment
Mobility/Orthopedic Impairment
Other
None
Citizenship:
(Choose one)
U.S. Citizen
Permanent Resident
Other non-U.S. Citizen
Check here if you do not wish to provide any or all of the above information (excluding PI/PD name):
REQUIRED: Check here if you are currently serving (or have previously served) as a PI, co-PI or PD on any federally funded
project
Ethnicity Definition:
Hispanic or Latino. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless
of race.
Race Definitions:
American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central
America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific Islands.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
WHY THIS INFORMATION IS BEING REQUESTED:
The Federal Government has a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to identify and address
any inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of its proposed PIs/PDs. To gather information needed for this important
task, the proposer should submit a single copy of this form for each identified PI/PD with each proposal. Submission of the requested
information is voluntary and will not affect the organization’s eligibility for an award. However, information not submitted will seriously undermine
the statistical validity, and therefore the usefulness, of information recieved from others. Any individual not wishing to submit some or all the
information should check the box provided for this purpose. (The exceptions are the PI/PD name and the information about prior Federal support, the
last question above.)
Collection of this information is authorized by the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1861, et seq. Demographic data allows NSF to
gauge whether our programs and other opportunities in science and technology are fairly reaching and benefiting everyone regardless of
demographic category; to ensure that those in under-represented groups have the same knowledge of and access to programs and other
research and educational oppurtunities; and to assess involvement of international investigators in work supported by NSF. The information
may be disclosed to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers to complete assigned work; and to other government
agencies in order to coordinate and assess programs. The information may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal
File and Associated Records", 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records",
63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998).
0426408
02 INFORMATION ABOUT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/PROJECT DIRECTORS(PI/PD) and
co-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/co-PROJECT DIRECTORS
Submit only ONE copy of this form for each PI/PD and co-PI/PD identified on the proposal. The form(s) should be attached to the original
proposal as specified in GPG Section II.B. Submission of this information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. This information will
not be disclosed to external peer reviewers. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM WITH ANY OF THE OTHER COPIES OF YOUR PROPOSAL AS
THIS MAY COMPROMISE THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION.
PI/PD Name:
James A Conder
Gender:
Male
Female
Ethnicity: (Choose one response)
Hispanic or Latino
Race:
(Select one or more)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Hispanic or Latino
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Disability Status:
(Select one or more)
Hearing Impairment
Visual Impairment
Mobility/Orthopedic Impairment
Other
None
Citizenship:
(Choose one)
U.S. Citizen
Permanent Resident
Other non-U.S. Citizen
Check here if you do not wish to provide any or all of the above information (excluding PI/PD name):
REQUIRED: Check here if you are currently serving (or have previously served) as a PI, co-PI or PD on any federally funded
project
Ethnicity Definition:
Hispanic or Latino. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless
of race.
Race Definitions:
American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central
America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific Islands.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
WHY THIS INFORMATION IS BEING REQUESTED:
The Federal Government has a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to identify and address
any inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of its proposed PIs/PDs. To gather information needed for this important
task, the proposer should submit a single copy of this form for each identified PI/PD with each proposal. Submission of the requested
information is voluntary and will not affect the organization’s eligibility for an award. However, information not submitted will seriously undermine
the statistical validity, and therefore the usefulness, of information recieved from others. Any individual not wishing to submit some or all the
information should check the box provided for this purpose. (The exceptions are the PI/PD name and the information about prior Federal support, the
last question above.)
Collection of this information is authorized by the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1861, et seq. Demographic data allows NSF to
gauge whether our programs and other opportunities in science and technology are fairly reaching and benefiting everyone regardless of
demographic category; to ensure that those in under-represented groups have the same knowledge of and access to programs and other
research and educational oppurtunities; and to assess involvement of international investigators in work supported by NSF. The information
may be disclosed to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers to complete assigned work; and to other government
agencies in order to coordinate and assess programs. The information may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal
File and Associated Records", 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records",
63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998).
0426408
02 INFORMATION ABOUT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/PROJECT DIRECTORS(PI/PD) and
co-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/co-PROJECT DIRECTORS
Submit only ONE copy of this form for each PI/PD and co-PI/PD identified on the proposal. The form(s) should be attached to the original
proposal as specified in GPG Section II.B. Submission of this information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. This information will
not be disclosed to external peer reviewers. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM WITH ANY OF THE OTHER COPIES OF YOUR PROPOSAL AS
THIS MAY COMPROMISE THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION.
PI/PD Name:
Donna K Blackman
Gender:
Male
Female
Ethnicity: (Choose one response)
Hispanic or Latino
Race:
(Select one or more)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Hispanic or Latino
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Disability Status:
(Select one or more)
Hearing Impairment
Visual Impairment
Mobility/Orthopedic Impairment
Other
None
Citizenship:
(Choose one)
U.S. Citizen
Permanent Resident
Other non-U.S. Citizen
Check here if you do not wish to provide any or all of the above information (excluding PI/PD name):
REQUIRED: Check here if you are currently serving (or have previously served) as a PI, co-PI or PD on any federally funded
project
Ethnicity Definition:
Hispanic or Latino. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless
of race.
Race Definitions:
American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central
America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific Islands.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
WHY THIS INFORMATION IS BEING REQUESTED:
The Federal Government has a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to identify and address
any inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of its proposed PIs/PDs. To gather information needed for this important
task, the proposer should submit a single copy of this form for each identified PI/PD with each proposal. Submission of the requested
information is voluntary and will not affect the organization’s eligibility for an award. However, information not submitted will seriously undermine
the statistical validity, and therefore the usefulness, of information recieved from others. Any individual not wishing to submit some or all the
information should check the box provided for this purpose. (The exceptions are the PI/PD name and the information about prior Federal support, the
last question above.)
Collection of this information is authorized by the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1861, et seq. Demographic data allows NSF to
gauge whether our programs and other opportunities in science and technology are fairly reaching and benefiting everyone regardless of
demographic category; to ensure that those in under-represented groups have the same knowledge of and access to programs and other
research and educational oppurtunities; and to assess involvement of international investigators in work supported by NSF. The information
may be disclosed to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers to complete assigned work; and to other government
agencies in order to coordinate and assess programs. The information may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal
File and Associated Records", 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records",
63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998).
0430463
02 INFORMATION ABOUT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/PROJECT DIRECTORS(PI/PD) and
co-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/co-PROJECT DIRECTORS
Submit only ONE copy of this form for each PI/PD and co-PI/PD identified on the proposal. The form(s) should be attached to the original
proposal as specified in GPG Section II.B. Submission of this information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. This information will
not be disclosed to external peer reviewers. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM WITH ANY OF THE OTHER COPIES OF YOUR PROPOSAL AS
THIS MAY COMPROMISE THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION.
PI/PD Name:
Robert A Dunn
Gender:
Male
Female
Ethnicity: (Choose one response)
Hispanic or Latino
Race:
(Select one or more)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Hispanic or Latino
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Disability Status:
(Select one or more)
Hearing Impairment
Visual Impairment
Mobility/Orthopedic Impairment
Other
None
Citizenship:
(Choose one)
U.S. Citizen
Permanent Resident
Other non-U.S. Citizen
Check here if you do not wish to provide any or all of the above information (excluding PI/PD name):
REQUIRED: Check here if you are currently serving (or have previously served) as a PI, co-PI or PD on any federally funded
project
Ethnicity Definition:
Hispanic or Latino. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless
of race.
Race Definitions:
American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central
America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific Islands.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
WHY THIS INFORMATION IS BEING REQUESTED:
The Federal Government has a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to identify and address
any inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of its proposed PIs/PDs. To gather information needed for this important
task, the proposer should submit a single copy of this form for each identified PI/PD with each proposal. Submission of the requested
information is voluntary and will not affect the organization’s eligibility for an award. However, information not submitted will seriously undermine
the statistical validity, and therefore the usefulness, of information recieved from others. Any individual not wishing to submit some or all the
information should check the box provided for this purpose. (The exceptions are the PI/PD name and the information about prior Federal support, the
last question above.)
Collection of this information is authorized by the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1861, et seq. Demographic data allows NSF to
gauge whether our programs and other opportunities in science and technology are fairly reaching and benefiting everyone regardless of
demographic category; to ensure that those in under-represented groups have the same knowledge of and access to programs and other
research and educational oppurtunities; and to assess involvement of international investigators in work supported by NSF. The information
may be disclosed to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers to complete assigned work; and to other government
agencies in order to coordinate and assess programs. The information may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal
File and Associated Records", 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records",
63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998).
0426428
02 INFORMATION ABOUT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/PROJECT DIRECTORS(PI/PD) and
co-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/co-PROJECT DIRECTORS
Submit only ONE copy of this form for each PI/PD and co-PI/PD identified on the proposal. The form(s) should be attached to the original
proposal as specified in GPG Section II.B. Submission of this information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. This information will
not be disclosed to external peer reviewers. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM WITH ANY OF THE OTHER COPIES OF YOUR PROPOSAL AS
THIS MAY COMPROMISE THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION.
PI/PD Name:
Spahr C Webb
Gender:
Male
Female
Ethnicity: (Choose one response)
Hispanic or Latino
Race:
(Select one or more)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Hispanic or Latino
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Disability Status:
(Select one or more)
Hearing Impairment
Visual Impairment
Mobility/Orthopedic Impairment
Other
None
Citizenship:
(Choose one)
U.S. Citizen
Permanent Resident
Other non-U.S. Citizen
Check here if you do not wish to provide any or all of the above information (excluding PI/PD name):
REQUIRED: Check here if you are currently serving (or have previously served) as a PI, co-PI or PD on any federally funded
project
Ethnicity Definition:
Hispanic or Latino. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless
of race.
Race Definitions:
American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central
America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific Islands.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
WHY THIS INFORMATION IS BEING REQUESTED:
The Federal Government has a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to identify and address
any inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of its proposed PIs/PDs. To gather information needed for this important
task, the proposer should submit a single copy of this form for each identified PI/PD with each proposal. Submission of the requested
information is voluntary and will not affect the organization’s eligibility for an award. However, information not submitted will seriously undermine
the statistical validity, and therefore the usefulness, of information recieved from others. Any individual not wishing to submit some or all the
information should check the box provided for this purpose. (The exceptions are the PI/PD name and the information about prior Federal support, the
last question above.)
Collection of this information is authorized by the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1861, et seq. Demographic data allows NSF to
gauge whether our programs and other opportunities in science and technology are fairly reaching and benefiting everyone regardless of
demographic category; to ensure that those in under-represented groups have the same knowledge of and access to programs and other
research and educational oppurtunities; and to assess involvement of international investigators in work supported by NSF. The information
may be disclosed to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers to complete assigned work; and to other government
agencies in order to coordinate and assess programs. The information may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal
File and Associated Records", 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records",
63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998).
0426369
02 INFORMATION ABOUT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/PROJECT DIRECTORS(PI/PD) and
co-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS/co-PROJECT DIRECTORS
Submit only ONE copy of this form for each PI/PD and co-PI/PD identified on the proposal. The form(s) should be attached to the original
proposal as specified in GPG Section II.B. Submission of this information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. This information will
not be disclosed to external peer reviewers. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM WITH ANY OF THE OTHER COPIES OF YOUR PROPOSAL AS
THIS MAY COMPROMISE THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION.
PI/PD Name:
William H Menke
Gender:
Male
Female
Ethnicity: (Choose one response)
Hispanic or Latino
Race:
(Select one or more)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Hispanic or Latino
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Disability Status:
(Select one or more)
Hearing Impairment
Visual Impairment
Mobility/Orthopedic Impairment
Other
None
Citizenship:
(Choose one)
U.S. Citizen
Permanent Resident
Other non-U.S. Citizen
Check here if you do not wish to provide any or all of the above information (excluding PI/PD name):
REQUIRED: Check here if you are currently serving (or have previously served) as a PI, co-PI or PD on any federally funded
project
Ethnicity Definition:
Hispanic or Latino. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless
of race.
Race Definitions:
American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central
America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific Islands.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
WHY THIS INFORMATION IS BEING REQUESTED:
The Federal Government has a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to identify and address
any inequities based on gender, race, ethnicity, or disability of its proposed PIs/PDs. To gather information needed for this important
task, the proposer should submit a single copy of this form for each identified PI/PD with each proposal. Submission of the requested
information is voluntary and will not affect the organization’s eligibility for an award. However, information not submitted will seriously undermine
the statistical validity, and therefore the usefulness, of information recieved from others. Any individual not wishing to submit some or all the
information should check the box provided for this purpose. (The exceptions are the PI/PD name and the information about prior Federal support, the
last question above.)
Collection of this information is authorized by the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1861, et seq. Demographic data allows NSF to
gauge whether our programs and other opportunities in science and technology are fairly reaching and benefiting everyone regardless of
demographic category; to ensure that those in under-represented groups have the same knowledge of and access to programs and other
research and educational oppurtunities; and to assess involvement of international investigators in work supported by NSF. The information
may be disclosed to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers to complete assigned work; and to other government
agencies in order to coordinate and assess programs. The information may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal
File and Associated Records", 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records",
63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998).
0426369
List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include (optional)
SUGGESTED REVIEWERS:
Anne F. Sheehan, University of Colorado [email protected]
Sean C. Solomon, DTM (Carnegie) [email protected]
Jason Phipps-Morgan, GEOMAR, [email protected]
Charlie Langmuir, Harvard, [email protected]
Greg Hirth, [email protected]
Matt Fouch, Arizona State Univ., [email protected]
REVIEWERS NOT TO INCLUDE:
0426408
List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include (optional)
SUGGESTED REVIEWERS:
Not Listed
REVIEWERS NOT TO INCLUDE:
Not Listed
0430463
List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include (optional)
SUGGESTED REVIEWERS:
Not Listed
REVIEWERS NOT TO INCLUDE:
Not Listed
0426428
List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include (optional)
SUGGESTED REVIEWERS:
Not Listed
REVIEWERS NOT TO INCLUDE:
Not Listed
0426369
COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 04-2
NSF 02-011
FOR NSF USE ONLY
NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER
02/15/04
FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S)
0426408
(Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.)
OCE - MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS#
02/20/2004
1
06040000 OCE
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN)
1620
FILE LOCATION
(Data Universal Numbering System)
068552207
02/01/2008 1:10pm S
IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL
AGENCY?
YES
NO
IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S)
SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS
A RENEWAL
AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL
430653611
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE
ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
Washington University
St. Louis, MO. 631304899
Washington University
AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
0025205000
NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE
ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply)
(See GPG II.C For Definitions)
TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
MINORITY BUSINESS
IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL
WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE
Collaborative Research: Crustal Accretion and Mantle Processes Along
the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau Spreading Center
REQUESTED AMOUNT
489,682
$
SMALL BUSINESS
FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS)
48
REQUESTED STARTING DATE
SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO.
IF APPLICABLE
01/01/06
months
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW
BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.A)
HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.D.6)
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C)
Exemption Subsection
PROPRIETARY & PRIVILEGED INFORMATION (GPG I.B, II.C.1.d)
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES: COUNTRY/COUNTRIES INVOLVED
or IRB App. Date
HISTORIC PLACES (GPG II.C.2.j)
(GPG II.C.2.g.(iv).(c))
SMALL GRANT FOR EXPLOR. RESEARCH (SGER) (GPG II.D.1)
VERTEBRATE ANIMALS (GPG II.D.5) IACUC App. Date
PI/PD DEPARTMENT
HIGH RESOLUTION GRAPHICS/OTHER GRAPHICS WHERE EXACT COLOR
REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED FOR PROPER INTERPRETATION (GPG I.E.1)
PI/PD POSTAL ADDRESS
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences One Brookings Drive
Campus Box 1169
PI/PD FAX NUMBER
St. Louis, MO 631304899
314-935-7361
United States
NAMES (TYPED)
High Degree
Yr of Degree
Telephone Number
Electronic Mail Address
PhD
1985
314-935-6517
[email protected]
PhD
2001
314-935-7372
[email protected]
PI/PD NAME
Douglas A Wiens
CO-PI/PD
James A Conder
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
Page 1 of 2
Electronic Signature
0426408
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Certification for Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant:
By signing and submitting this proposal, the individual applicant or the authorized official of the applicant institution is: (1) certifying that
statements made herein are true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge; and (2) agreeing to accept the obligation to comply with NSF
award terms and conditions if an award is made as a result of this application. Further, the applicant is hereby providing certifications
regarding debarment and suspension, drug-free workplace, and lobbying activities (see below), as set forth in Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 04-2. Willful provision of false information in this application and its supporting documents or in reports required
under an ensuing award is a criminal offense (U. S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001).
In addition, if the applicant institution employs more than fifty persons, the authorized official of the applicant institution is certifying that the institution has
implemented a written and enforced conflict of interest policy that is consistent with the provisions of Grant Policy Manual Section 510; that to the best
of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures required by that conflict of interest policy have been made; and that all identified conflicts of interest will have
been satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated prior to the institution’s expenditure of any funds under the award, in accordance with the
institution’s conflict of interest policy. Conflicts which cannot be satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated must be disclosed to NSF.
Drug Free Work Place Certification
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Drug Free Work Place Certification
contained in Appendix C of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Debarment and Suspension Certification
(If answer "yes", please provide explanation.)
Is the organization or its principals presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency?
Yes
No
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Debarment and Suspension Certification
contained in Appendix D of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Certification Regarding Lobbying
This certification is required for an award of a Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000 and for an award of a Federal loan or
a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000.
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement,
and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,’’ in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
AUTHORIZED ORGANIZATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME
Cynthia White
TELEPHONE NUMBER
314-935-5825
Electronic Signature
ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS
Feb 25 2004 12:53PM
FAX NUMBER
[email protected]
314-935-5862
*SUBMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS IS VOLUNTARY AND WILL NOT AFFECT THE ORGANIZATION’S ELIGIBILITY FOR AN AWARD. HOWEVER, THEY ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEM AND ASSIST IN PROCESSING THE PROPOSAL. SSN SOLICITED UNDER NSF ACT OF 1950, AS AMENDED.
Page 2 of 2
0426408
COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 04-2
NSF 02-011
FOR NSF USE ONLY
NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER
02/15/04
FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S)
0430463
(Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.)
OCE - MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS#
03/03/2004
1
06040000 OCE
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN)
1620
FILE LOCATION
(Data Universal Numbering System)
175104595
02/01/2008 1:10pm S
IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL
AGENCY?
YES
NO
IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S)
SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS
A RENEWAL
AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL
956006144
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE
ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
9500 Gilman Drive
La Jolla, CA. 92093
0013177010
NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE
ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply)
(See GPG II.C For Definitions)
TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
MINORITY BUSINESS
IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL
WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE
Collaborative Research: Crustal acretion and Mantel Processes along
the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau Spreading Center
REQUESTED AMOUNT
114,996
$
SMALL BUSINESS
FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS)
48
REQUESTED STARTING DATE
SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO.
IF APPLICABLE
01/01/06
months
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW
BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.A)
HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.D.6)
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C)
Exemption Subsection
PROPRIETARY & PRIVILEGED INFORMATION (GPG I.B, II.C.1.d)
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES: COUNTRY/COUNTRIES INVOLVED
or IRB App. Date
HISTORIC PLACES (GPG II.C.2.j)
(GPG II.C.2.g.(iv).(c))
SMALL GRANT FOR EXPLOR. RESEARCH (SGER) (GPG II.D.1)
VERTEBRATE ANIMALS (GPG II.D.5) IACUC App. Date
PI/PD DEPARTMENT
PI/PD POSTAL ADDRESS
Institute of Geophysics & Planet Physics
PI/PD FAX NUMBER
858-534-5332
NAMES (TYPED)
HIGH RESOLUTION GRAPHICS/OTHER GRAPHICS WHERE EXACT COLOR
REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED FOR PROPER INTERPRETATION (GPG I.E.1)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
9500 Gilman Drive
La Jolla, CA 920930225
United States
High Degree
Yr of Degree
Telephone Number
PhD
1991
858-534-8813
Electronic Mail Address
PI/PD NAME
Donna K Blackman
[email protected]
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
Page 1 of 2
Electronic Signature
0430463
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Certification for Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant:
By signing and submitting this proposal, the individual applicant or the authorized official of the applicant institution is: (1) certifying that
statements made herein are true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge; and (2) agreeing to accept the obligation to comply with NSF
award terms and conditions if an award is made as a result of this application. Further, the applicant is hereby providing certifications
regarding debarment and suspension, drug-free workplace, and lobbying activities (see below), as set forth in Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 04-2. Willful provision of false information in this application and its supporting documents or in reports required
under an ensuing award is a criminal offense (U. S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001).
In addition, if the applicant institution employs more than fifty persons, the authorized official of the applicant institution is certifying that the institution has
implemented a written and enforced conflict of interest policy that is consistent with the provisions of Grant Policy Manual Section 510; that to the best
of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures required by that conflict of interest policy have been made; and that all identified conflicts of interest will have
been satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated prior to the institution’s expenditure of any funds under the award, in accordance with the
institution’s conflict of interest policy. Conflicts which cannot be satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated must be disclosed to NSF.
Drug Free Work Place Certification
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Drug Free Work Place Certification
contained in Appendix C of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Debarment and Suspension Certification
(If answer "yes", please provide explanation.)
Is the organization or its principals presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency?
Yes
No
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Debarment and Suspension Certification
contained in Appendix D of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Certification Regarding Lobbying
This certification is required for an award of a Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000 and for an award of a Federal loan or
a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000.
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement,
and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,’’ in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
AUTHORIZED ORGANIZATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME
Marian E Crosser
TELEPHONE NUMBER
858-534-1293
Electronic Signature
ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS
Mar 3 2004 4:50PM
FAX NUMBER
[email protected]
858-534-9642
*SUBMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS IS VOLUNTARY AND WILL NOT AFFECT THE ORGANIZATION’S ELIGIBILITY FOR AN AWARD. HOWEVER, THEY ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEM AND ASSIST IN PROCESSING THE PROPOSAL. SSN SOLICITED UNDER NSF ACT OF 1950, AS AMENDED.
Page 2 of 2
0430463
COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 04-2
NSF 02-011
FOR NSF USE ONLY
NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER
02/15/04
FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S)
0426428
(Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.)
OCE - MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS#
02/20/2004
1
06040000 OCE
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN)
1620
FILE LOCATION
(Data Universal Numbering System)
965088057
02/01/2008 1:10pm S
IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL
AGENCY?
YES
NO
IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S)
SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS
A RENEWAL
AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL
996000354
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE
ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
2530 Dole Street
ORS, Sakamaki D-200
HONOLULU, HI 96822-2303
University of Hawaii
AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
0016105000
NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE
ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply)
(See GPG II.C For Definitions)
TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
MINORITY BUSINESS
IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL
WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE
Collaborative Research: Crustal Accretion and Mantle Processes Along
the Subduction-Influenced East Lau Spreading Center
REQUESTED AMOUNT
392,959
$
SMALL BUSINESS
FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS)
48
REQUESTED STARTING DATE
SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO.
IF APPLICABLE
01/01/06
months
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW
BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.A)
HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.D.6)
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C)
Exemption Subsection
PROPRIETARY & PRIVILEGED INFORMATION (GPG I.B, II.C.1.d)
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES: COUNTRY/COUNTRIES INVOLVED
or IRB App. Date
HISTORIC PLACES (GPG II.C.2.j)
(GPG II.C.2.g.(iv).(c))
SMALL GRANT FOR EXPLOR. RESEARCH (SGER) (GPG II.D.1)
VERTEBRATE ANIMALS (GPG II.D.5) IACUC App. Date
PI/PD DEPARTMENT
PI/PD POSTAL ADDRESS
Department of Geology and Geophysics
PI/PD FAX NUMBER
NAMES (TYPED)
HIGH RESOLUTION GRAPHICS/OTHER GRAPHICS WHERE EXACT COLOR
REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED FOR PROPER INTERPRETATION (GPG I.E.1)
1680 East-West Road
POST 819
Honolulu, HI 968222225
United States
High Degree
Yr of Degree
Telephone Number
PhD
1999
808-956-3728
Electronic Mail Address
PI/PD NAME
Robert A Dunn
[email protected]
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
Page 1 of 2
Electronic Signature
0426428
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Certification for Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant:
By signing and submitting this proposal, the individual applicant or the authorized official of the applicant institution is: (1) certifying that
statements made herein are true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge; and (2) agreeing to accept the obligation to comply with NSF
award terms and conditions if an award is made as a result of this application. Further, the applicant is hereby providing certifications
regarding debarment and suspension, drug-free workplace, and lobbying activities (see below), as set forth in Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 04-2. Willful provision of false information in this application and its supporting documents or in reports required
under an ensuing award is a criminal offense (U. S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001).
In addition, if the applicant institution employs more than fifty persons, the authorized official of the applicant institution is certifying that the institution has
implemented a written and enforced conflict of interest policy that is consistent with the provisions of Grant Policy Manual Section 510; that to the best
of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures required by that conflict of interest policy have been made; and that all identified conflicts of interest will have
been satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated prior to the institution’s expenditure of any funds under the award, in accordance with the
institution’s conflict of interest policy. Conflicts which cannot be satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated must be disclosed to NSF.
Drug Free Work Place Certification
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Drug Free Work Place Certification
contained in Appendix C of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Debarment and Suspension Certification
(If answer "yes", please provide explanation.)
Is the organization or its principals presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency?
Yes
No
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Debarment and Suspension Certification
contained in Appendix D of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Certification Regarding Lobbying
This certification is required for an award of a Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000 and for an award of a Federal loan or
a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000.
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement,
and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,’’ in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
AUTHORIZED ORGANIZATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME
Linda Lau
TELEPHONE NUMBER
808-956-6058
Electronic Signature
ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS
Feb 20 2004 7:28PM
FAX NUMBER
[email protected]
808-956-9081
*SUBMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS IS VOLUNTARY AND WILL NOT AFFECT THE ORGANIZATION’S ELIGIBILITY FOR AN AWARD. HOWEVER, THEY ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEM AND ASSIST IN PROCESSING THE PROPOSAL. SSN SOLICITED UNDER NSF ACT OF 1950, AS AMENDED.
Page 2 of 2
0426428
COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 04-2
NSF 02-011
FOR NSF USE ONLY
NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER
02/15/04
FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S)
0426369
(Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.)
OCE - MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS#
02/20/2004
1
06040000 OCE
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN)
1620
FILE LOCATION
(Data Universal Numbering System)
049179401
02/01/2008 1:11pm S
IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL
AGENCY?
YES
NO
IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S)
SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS
A RENEWAL
AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL
135598093
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE
ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
NEW YORK, NY 100276902
US
Columbia University
AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
0027078000
NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE
ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE
Columbia University Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN)
Columbia Lamont Earth Obs
Rt 9W
Palisades, NY 10964
0027078040
IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply)
(See GPG II.C For Definitions)
TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
MINORITY BUSINESS
IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL
WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE
Collaborative Research: Crustal Accretion and Mantle Processes Along
the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau Spreading Center
REQUESTED AMOUNT
395,944
$
SMALL BUSINESS
FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS)
48
REQUESTED STARTING DATE
SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO.
IF APPLICABLE
01/01/06
months
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW
BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.A)
HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.D.6)
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C)
Exemption Subsection
PROPRIETARY & PRIVILEGED INFORMATION (GPG I.B, II.C.1.d)
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES: COUNTRY/COUNTRIES INVOLVED
or IRB App. Date
HISTORIC PLACES (GPG II.C.2.j)
(GPG II.C.2.g.(iv).(c))
SMALL GRANT FOR EXPLOR. RESEARCH (SGER) (GPG II.D.1)
VERTEBRATE ANIMALS (GPG II.D.5) IACUC App. Date
PI/PD DEPARTMENT
PI/PD POSTAL ADDRESS
Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
P.O. Box 1000, 61 Route 9W
Palisades, NY 10964
United States
Seismology Department
PI/PD FAX NUMBER
845-365-8150
NAMES (TYPED)
HIGH RESOLUTION GRAPHICS/OTHER GRAPHICS WHERE EXACT COLOR
REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED FOR PROPER INTERPRETATION (GPG I.E.1)
High Degree
Yr of Degree
Telephone Number
Electronic Mail Address
PhD
1984
845-365-8439
[email protected]
Ph.D.
1982
845-365-8438
[email protected]
PI/PD NAME
Spahr C Webb
CO-PI/PD
William H Menke
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
CO-PI/PD
Page 1 of 2
Electronic Signature
0426369
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Certification for Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant:
By signing and submitting this proposal, the individual applicant or the authorized official of the applicant institution is: (1) certifying that
statements made herein are true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge; and (2) agreeing to accept the obligation to comply with NSF
award terms and conditions if an award is made as a result of this application. Further, the applicant is hereby providing certifications
regarding debarment and suspension, drug-free workplace, and lobbying activities (see below), as set forth in Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 04-2. Willful provision of false information in this application and its supporting documents or in reports required
under an ensuing award is a criminal offense (U. S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001).
In addition, if the applicant institution employs more than fifty persons, the authorized official of the applicant institution is certifying that the institution has
implemented a written and enforced conflict of interest policy that is consistent with the provisions of Grant Policy Manual Section 510; that to the best
of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures required by that conflict of interest policy have been made; and that all identified conflicts of interest will have
been satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated prior to the institution’s expenditure of any funds under the award, in accordance with the
institution’s conflict of interest policy. Conflicts which cannot be satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated must be disclosed to NSF.
Drug Free Work Place Certification
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Drug Free Work Place Certification
contained in Appendix C of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Debarment and Suspension Certification
(If answer "yes", please provide explanation.)
Is the organization or its principals presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency?
Yes
No
By electronically signing the NSF Proposal Cover Sheet, the Authorized Organizational Representative or Individual Applicant is providing the Debarment and Suspension Certification
contained in Appendix D of the Grant Proposal Guide.
Certification Regarding Lobbying
This certification is required for an award of a Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000 and for an award of a Federal loan or
a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000.
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement,
and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,’’ in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
AUTHORIZED ORGANIZATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME
Beth H Israel
TELEPHONE NUMBER
212-854-6851
Electronic Signature
ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS
Feb 20 2004 4:13PM
FAX NUMBER
[email protected]
212-854-2738
*SUBMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS IS VOLUNTARY AND WILL NOT AFFECT THE ORGANIZATION’S ELIGIBILITY FOR AN AWARD. HOWEVER, THEY ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEM AND ASSIST IN PROCESSING THE PROPOSAL. SSN SOLICITED UNDER NSF ACT OF 1950, AS AMENDED.
Page 2 of 2
0426369
Project Summary
Two fundamental questions posed in the RIDGE2000 (R2K) Science plan deal with melt
formation and transport, and its relationship to mantle flow patterns and composition. The Eastern Lau
Spreading Center (ELSC) was selected as a R2K ISS site in large part because of its tremendous alongstrike variation in geochemistry, petrology, spreading rate, crustal structure, and morphology. Because of
this variation, as well as the presence of slab earthquakes to function as a source array, the ELSC
represents the optimum location for an experiment to study the relationship between mantle melt
production, mantle flow and spreading center processes. We propose a combined active and passive
seismic experiment along the Eastern Lau Spreading Center (ELSC) to test the following previously
proposed hypotheses:
1. Circulation in the mantle wedge is dominated by slab driven flow.
TEST: comparison of seismic anisotropy results to predictions of slab driven and other flow models
2. Interaction of the arc and backarc magma production regions controls the character of the
ridge by influencing melt flux, petrology, and geochemistry.
TEST: the along-strike pattern of spatial separation between arc and spreading center melt production
zones as determined by P, S, surface wave, and attenuation tomography
3. Variations in the mantle melt supply control ridge crest features such as morphology, thermal
structure, and hydrothermal venting.
TEST: the observed relationship between ridge crest features and melt content imaged in the crust and
uppermost mantle
The passive experiment consists of 55 broadband ocean bottom seismographs (OBS) and 5 land
seismographs deployed for 10 months to image the larger-scale structure of the melt production region
and the mantle flow pattern. Interaction between the spreading center and arc magmas and fluids may
control many processes along the ELSC. Therefore the OBS array will extend across the active Tonga
volcanic arc to allow imaging of the spatial relationship between the backarc ridge magma source region
and fluid rich regions near the slab and arc magma source. The deployment will also provide an
exceptional record of ELSC seismic activity, including the potential to accurately determine depths and
focal mechanisms. The active source experiment consists of 100 OBS deployments along a 250 km
section of the ELSC extending from the inflated Valu Fa region to the magma-starved northern ELSC
where the axial melt lens is absent. This experiment will image structure on a scale of 1-3 km, and will
provide detailed constraints on thermal structure and melt distribution immediately beneath the ELSC.
The active survey will be carried out during the first part of the passive deployment cruise using the same
OBSs; this single-leg approach saves ship time and OBS costs compared to separate experiments.
Seismic data will be analyzed using body and surface wave tomographic methods and shear wave
splitting analysis to obtain seismic P and S and attenuation images, and constraints on seismic anisotropy
throughout the mantle wedge. These results will be compared to predictions of flow models incorporating
temperature-dependent viscosity, where seismic anisotropy is computed from the orientation distribution
of modeled olivine/enstatite aggregates. The combination of active and passive seismic techniques will
place powerful constraints on seismic properties at different depths and resolution scales, and enable
tracking of melt from initial production at depths of 20->100 km up to the axial magma chamber. If
funded, this project will occur in 2006; however, due to the ever-lengthening waiting list to obtain
broadband OBSs it needs to be scheduled during the current year for results to be obtained before the end
of the R2K program.
Broader Impact. We will work with Liz Goehring at the R2K office to expand the already substantial Lau
ISS outreach programs for K-12 and the general public. This project will strengthen scientific ties to the
Kingdom of Tonga and will help raise that nation’s scientific capabilities through participation of Tongan
scientists in both the land and sea components. The proposed research will offer undergraduate and
graduate research opportunities at each participating institution. The data sets we collect are substantive
and will become part of the R2K Integrated Study Site and IRIS DMC databases, and will provide broad
research opportunities in many areas for years to come.
0426408
TABLE OF CONTENTS
For font size and page formatting specifications, see GPG section II.C.
Total No. of
Pages
Page No.*
(Optional)*
Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation
Project Summary
(not to exceed 1 page)
1
Table of Contents
1
Project Description (Including Results from Prior
NSF Support) (not to exceed 15 pages) (Exceed only if allowed by a
specific program announcement/solicitation or if approved in
advance by the appropriate NSF Assistant Director or designee)
15
References Cited
6
Biographical Sketches
(Not to exceed 2 pages each)
Budget
3
10
(Plus up to 3 pages of budget justification)
Current and Pending Support
4
Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources
2
Special Information/Supplementary Documentation
8
Appendix (List below. )
(Include only if allowed by a specific program announcement/
solicitation or if approved in advance by the appropriate NSF
Assistant Director or designee)
Appendix Items:
*Proposers may select any numbering mechanism for the proposal. The entire proposal however, must be paginated.
Complete both columns only if the proposal is numbered consecutively.
0426408
TABLE OF CONTENTS
For font size and page formatting specifications, see GPG section II.C.
Total No. of
Pages
Page No.*
(Optional)*
Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation
Project Summary
(not to exceed 1 page)
Table of Contents
1
Project Description (Including Results from Prior
NSF Support) (not to exceed 15 pages) (Exceed only if allowed by a
specific program announcement/solicitation or if approved in
advance by the appropriate NSF Assistant Director or designee)
0
References Cited
Biographical Sketches
(Not to exceed 2 pages each)
Budget
2
6
(Plus up to 3 pages of budget justification)
Current and Pending Support
4
Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources
1
Special Information/Supplementary Documentation
8
Appendix (List below. )
(Include only if allowed by a specific program announcement/
solicitation or if approved in advance by the appropriate NSF
Assistant Director or designee)
Appendix Items:
*Proposers may select any numbering mechanism for the proposal. The entire proposal however, must be paginated.
Complete both columns only if the proposal is numbered consecutively.
0430463
TABLE OF CONTENTS
For font size and page formatting specifications, see GPG section II.C.
Total No. of
Pages
Page No.*
(Optional)*
Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation
Project Summary
(not to exceed 1 page)
Table of Contents
1
Project Description (Including Results from Prior
NSF Support) (not to exceed 15 pages) (Exceed only if allowed by a
specific program announcement/solicitation or if approved in
advance by the appropriate NSF Assistant Director or designee)
0
References Cited
Biographical Sketches
(Not to exceed 2 pages each)
Budget
2
6
(Plus up to 3 pages of budget justification)
Current and Pending Support
1
Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources
1
Special Information/Supplementary Documentation
8
Appendix (List below. )
(Include only if allowed by a specific program announcement/
solicitation or if approved in advance by the appropriate NSF
Assistant Director or designee)
Appendix Items:
*Proposers may select any numbering mechanism for the proposal. The entire proposal however, must be paginated.
Complete both columns only if the proposal is numbered consecutively.
0426428
TABLE OF CONTENTS
For font size and page formatting specifications, see GPG section II.C.
Total No. of
Pages
Page No.*
(Optional)*
Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation
Project Summary
(not to exceed 1 page)
Table of Contents
1
Project Description (Including Results from Prior
NSF Support) (not to exceed 15 pages) (Exceed only if allowed by a
specific program announcement/solicitation or if approved in
advance by the appropriate NSF Assistant Director or designee)
0
References Cited
Biographical Sketches
(Not to exceed 2 pages each)
Budget
2
6
(Plus up to 3 pages of budget justification)
Current and Pending Support
4
Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources
1
Special Information/Supplementary Documentation
8
Appendix (List below. )
(Include only if allowed by a specific program announcement/
solicitation or if approved in advance by the appropriate NSF
Assistant Director or designee)
Appendix Items:
*Proposers may select any numbering mechanism for the proposal. The entire proposal however, must be paginated.
Complete both columns only if the proposal is numbered consecutively.
0426369
This is a collaborative proposal; the participating institutions and budget breakdown are as follows:
Institution
Washington Univ. (Lead)
Lamont-Doherty
Hawaii
Scripps
Totals
yr 1
135,637
108,145
95,249
24,091
362,960
yr 2
132,130
102,955
96,719
41,588
373,223
yr 3
110,090
90,336
100,680
31,808
332,736
yr 4
111,825
94,508
100,311
18,404
324,862
total
489,682
395,944
392,959
115,891
1,394,476
1. Introduction and Motivation
The generation and transport of melt beneath oceanic spreading centers is perhaps the most important
geological process shaping the earth; it produces over two thirds of the global crust and is a primary
means of geochemical differentiation in the Earth. Yet the physical mechanisms controlling melt
aggregation, transport, and collection within the axial crust are poorly understood. Most of our
understanding of melt dynamics beneath ridges results from petrological and geochemical studies of the
materials output by this process. In contrast, the spatial distribution of melt and the associated convective
mantle structure have been imaged in few locations. For example, the MELT experiment [e.g. Forsyth,
1998] imaged a section across the southern East Pacific Rise (EPR), providing constraints on 2-D
subaxial structure. However, both surface morphology and geochemical outputs vary substantially along
and between ridge segments so our goal is to take advantage of this fact to understand the relationship
between mantle melt processes and the surface manifestation along the ridge. Careful documentation of
both crustal and upper mantle structure along a single ridge segment, combined with modeling of mantle
flow and melting are required to accomplish this goal. To date, such a 3-D imaging/modeling study has
not been attempted along an oceanic spreading center.
The Eastern Lau Spreading Center (ELSC) provides the best location for this work. The ELSC was
recently chosen by the RIDGE 2000 (R2K) program for focused, multidisciplinary study, due to its
backarc setting and the exceptional along-strike variability in chemistry, petrology, morphology, and
hydrothermal flux. Detailed 3-D imaging of the upper mantle and crust will allow us to fulfill the first
three of the seven objectives of the Lau Integrated Studies Implementation Plan: (1) Characterize the
mantle flow pattern and the magma production and transport regions; (2) Understand the origin
and consequences of gradients in lava composition along the ELSC; (3) Understand the spatialtemporal variations of crustal architecture.
A combined passive and active seismic experiment along the ELSC will image upper mantle and
crustal properties and their along-strike variation over a 250 km long section of the ELSC (Figures 1 and
2) to evaluate the following, previously proposed hypotheses:
1. Circulation in the mantle wedge is dominated by slab driven flow.
2. Interaction of the arc and backarc magma production regions controls the character of the
ridge by influencing melt flux, petrology, and geochemistry.
3. Variations in the mantle melt supply control ridge crest features such as morphology, thermal
structure, and hydrothermal venting.
The backarc setting of the ELSC provides the ideal opportunity to image along-strike changes in
magma production and transport because intermediate and deep earthquakes provide a source array
immediately beneath the study area. The energetic, high-frequency signals generated by these nearby
earthquakes are essential for successful seismic velocity, attenuation, and anisotropy studies that can be
integrated with flow modeling. For example, attenuation tomographic images were readily obtained from
the LABATTS backarc deployment [Roth et al., 1999] whereas the absence of high frequency body
waves prevented such studies for the MELT experiment along the EPR [W. Wilcock, pers. comm.].
In order for RIDGE 2000 to achieve its goal of understanding the full mantle-microbe system, an
OBS imaging study must be scheduled in the current year. There is a backlog for passive OBSs (first
use possible if funded immediately is 2006). Scheduling now will allow the field work to be done in
2006/2007 and the analysis to be nearly complete by the end of the RIDGE 2000 program (2008-2009).
C-1
0426408
Figure 1 (left): Seafloor bathymetry and
layout of the passive-source seismic
experiment. Dots indicate OBS positions.
Long active-source refraction lines will
be carried out along the two long, ridgeperpendicular OBS lines.
Figure 2 (below): (A) Color-shaded
bathymetry and layout of the activesource experiment. Triangles represent
OBS positions. Shots are fired every
~500 m along the black lines. (B)
Northward increase in axial depth and the
distance from the ridge to the arc. Blue
triangles: hydrothermal vent sites. (C)
Spreading rate increases northward, while
axial cross-sectional area decreases and
axial rise becomes a rift. (D) Mantle
Bouguer gravity anomaly increases
northward (E) Layer 2A thickness
decreases northward. Depth of the AMC
reflector is variable. Importantly the
reflector is not observed to the north,
where the spreading rate is highest.
Adapted from Martinez and Taylor
[2002] and Jacobs et al., [2003].
C-2
0426408
Only two mantle imaging experiments have occurred in backarc settings – the LABATTS experiment
in the Lau basin (1994) and the Mariana Subduction Factory experiment in 2003-2004. These
experiments address problems distinct from those outlined for the ELSC above, and are insufficient to
answer the questions addressed in this proposal for the following reasons:
LABATTS (Funded through core MG&G)
1) Imaged the Central Lau Spreading Center (CLSC), characterized by conventional MOR
morphology and chemistry: did not cover any part ofELSC, the RIDGE 2000 ISS site
2) Was a 2-D deployment and so provided only sparse information about along-strike changes
3) Had ~50 km OBS spacing, which provided very coarse resolution in the subaxial region
4) Was only a 3 month deployment using narrowband OBSs, many were deployed in the forearc.
5) Lacked an active source component sufficient to image magma collection and transport in the
crust and upper several kilometers of the mantle.
MARIANA SUBFAC (Funded through MARGINS)
1) Emphasized arc and forearc imaging in the OBS array design, not the backarc spreading center.
2) Imaged a 60 km section of the spreading center that is only weakly 3-D in character
3) Did not conduct high-density active source work so it is not possible to relate deep structure to
shallow properties within the crust.
The Mariana Subfac OBSs will be recovered in May 2004 and the analysis should be largely complete by
the time our proposed Lau OBS deployment would occur, June 2006. Lessons learned from the Mariana
experiment will be incorporated in the final planning for the ELSC experiment.
2. The Eastern Lau Spreading Center
The ELSC is characterized by rapid along-strike changes in many variables (Figure 2) and thus
presents an excellent opportunity to understand the importance of various forcing functions in controlling
ridge processes. Going from south to north, the spreading rate increases from 40 to 95 mm/yr [Zellmer
and Taylor, 2001], the ridge axis changes from inflated to an axial valley [Martinez and Taylor, 2002],
the melt lens disappears and layer 2A thins [Collier and Sinha, 1992; Harding et al., 2000], the crustal
composition changes from andesitic to tholeiitic [Vallier et al., 1991; Peate et al., 2001], and isotopic
values change from Pacific to Indian Ocean mantle domains [Pearce et al., 1995]. Furthermore, the depth
of the spreading axis increases, the mantle Bouguer gravity values increase, and active hydrothermal
venting disappears [Fouquet et al., 1991; Bortnikov et al., 1993]. The distance of the ridge from the
Tonga arc increases from 30 km to 100 km and the depth to the underlying slab increases from 150 km to
250 km.
It is hypothesized that many of the along-strike changes in the ELSC are produced by variable
geochemical and petrological inputs via subduction, with the greatest influence in the south where the
ridge is closest to the arc [Martinez and Taylor, 2002; Pearce et al., 1995]. It is likely that the unusual
chemistry observed in Valu Fa hydrothermal vents, particularly the enrichment in Zn and other metals, is
related to the enriched andesitic crustal composition and the influence of slab-derived volatiles [Fouquet
et al., 1993; Herzig et al., 1993]. Thus, mantle melting processes appear to play a vital role in forming the
chemical systems that are fundamental to the Lau vent ecosystems.
Despite the inferences that can be made based on petrology and geochemistry, the physical processes
by which the slab de-fluidization may influence the ELSC to produce the systematic morphologic and
other signals are currently just (reasonable) conjecture. The missing link is the pattern of flow in the
mantle wedge and its relation to variation in melt chemistry, distribution, and migration paths to the ridge.
3. Models of Mantle Processes and Specific Hypotheses to Test
Because of the unique character of the ELSC and the frequent, energetic, and high-frequency
earthquake events nearby, the ELSC offers perhaps the best location for revealing the mantle's role in
governing ridge crest processes and thus the best opportunity to answer several fundamental questions
concerning this interaction. Qualitative and conflicting models of mantle flow and melt supply have
C-3
0426408
been proposed to explain the observed trends in ELSC characteristics. Here we briefly summarize those
models and highlight the testable hypotheses that our study will address.
3.1 Backarc mantle circulation is dominated by slab driven flow
The flow pattern in the mantle wedge of a subduction zone controls many factors, including the
location and degree of decompression melting [Andrews and Sleep, 1974, Conder et al., 2002] and the
spatial variation in geochemistry [Hochstaedter et al., 2001]. Most modeling studies assume a 2-D
geometry and predict that mantle structure will be dominated by slab-driven flow [McKenzie, 1979; Ribe,
1989; Davies and Stevenson, 1992; Kincaid and Sacks, 1997]. The long-term (>40 Myr, ODP ‘92)
Pacific plate subduction, the high convergence rate in comparison with backarc spreading rates, and the
great length of the Tonga Trench all lead to a prediction of dominant trench perpendicular flow beneath
the Lau Basin. Martinez and Taylor, [2002; 2003] embrace this view in their explanation of the alongstrike variation in axial characteristics (Figure 3). They propose that (1) the spatial proximity of the Valu
Fa Ridge to the arc causes the ridge to tap arc volcanic melts (slab-hydrated) and receive an enhanced
melt supply, (2) mantle wedge return flow of depleted material is responsible for the melt starved
tectonics of the Northern ELSC where the ridge is farther from the arc, and (3) farther to the north along
CLSC, the ridge is sufficiently far away from the slab, such that it taps "normal" mantle and shows typical
MOR characteristics.
Figure 3: The Martinez and Taylor [2003] model
for ridge-arc interaction. (Top left) The ridge is
close to the arc and "pirates" arc melts. (Top right)
The ridge is further from the arc and receives
depleted mantle from the arc system, which
reduces the melt supply to the ridge. (Lower left)
The ridge is sufficiently far from the arc to be
uninfluenced by the arc. Flow lines are
hypothetical rather than calculated.
Alternatively, 3-D mantle flow may contribute significantly to the observed ridge characteristics.
Turner and Hawkesworth [1998] suggest that mantle flows in around the northern edge of the subducting
plate (Figure 4) since isotopic data from rock samples from the northern Lau Basin show a 3He/4He
signature distinctive of the Samoan hot spot. Smith et al. [2001] infer that observed trench-parallel fast S
polarization directions reflect this inflow of Samoan-signature mantle. In addition, slab rollback may
occur at a rate up to ~100 mm/yr and could draw asthenosphere into the wedge from around the sides and
the bottom of the slab [Buttles and Olson, 1998; Kincaid and Griffiths, 2003].
We propose to test the 2-D versus 3-D hypothesis by determining the mantle flow pattern in the Lau
basin using seismic anisotropy. Various field and laboratory studies [e.g. Nicolas and Christensen, 1987;
Mainprice and Silver, 1993; Zhang and Karato, 1995; Zhang et al., 2000;] confirm that deformationinduced mineral orientation produces a 'fast direction' of upper mantle anisotropy aligned close to or
along the flow direction. Thus, the fast S-wave polarization and fast P-wave propagation directions
should be dominantly trench-perpendicular if the 2-D hypothesis is true. Subduction-dominated flow in
C-4
0426408
the mantle wedge should also produce notable asymmetry in the distribution of melt beneath the backarc
spreading center [Conder et al., 2002]. Detailed shear wave splitting and surface wave anisotropy
measurements throughout our passive OBS array will go far beyond the currently available, sparse
splitting data for the Lau mantle wedge farther to the north. Station coverage every several kilometers
will be critical to deduce any variation in anisotropic signature. If fast polarization directions beneath the
eastern basin are consistently trench-parallel, the 2-D flow hypothesis can be ruled out. For a 3-D flow
scenario, the pattern of anisotropy must vary in a manner that can be tied to a reasonable velocity field
and be consistent with temperature and melt distributions inferred from the other seismic and geochemical
results.
Some recent experiments suggest a different relationship between the 'fast direction' of anisotropy and
flow, either due to the presence of water [Jung and Karato, 2001] or through melt segregation into weak
shear zones [Holtzman et al., 2003]. If such results are applicable in the Lau mantle wedge, it would
likely only be in limited areas: adjacent to the slab (high local fluid content), or within migration
'channels' where fluid/melt occurs at fairly high fraction. Rapid spatial variability in anisotropic signals
could help us recognize such regions, if they exist.
3.2 Spatial relation between arc and backarc melt production regions controls ridge characteristics
Slower spreading ridges usually exhibit median valleys and faster ridges exhibit axial highs
[Malinverno, 1993; Small, 1998], with the differences thought to arise because of the different thermal
structures [Phipps Morgan et al., 1987; Phipps Morgan and Chen, 1993; Shah and Buck, 2001] and the
amount of inflation from magma supply [Scheirer and Macdonald, 1993]. However, the ELSC shows the
opposite pattern, with ridge inflation towards the slower spreading southern end and median valley
features toward the faster spreading northern end. As the spreading rate along the ELSC decreases to the
south, the ridge becomes steadily closer to the arc and, petrological and geochemical measurements reveal
arc influences on ELSC magmas, with high Ba/La and low Na, Ti, and Fe. These trends imply enhanced
upper mantle melting due to fluid enrichment from the slab [Stolper and Newman, 1994; Taylor and
Martinez, 2003]. The ELSC also shows enrichment in other fluid mobile elements [Hawkins, 1976;
Pearce et al., 1995], therefore fluids must be transferred from the slab to the melt production region of the
spreading center by some physical process. This gradient in slab fluid influence to the south led Martinez
and Taylor [2002] to speculate that the ridge taps melt from the arc magma region when the proximity
reaches a given threshold resulting in an axial high.
While this ‘magma piracy’ model [Martinez and Taylor, 2002] appears to be a viable mechanism to
explain ELSC chemistry and morphology, 3-D effects from the nearby termination of the spreading axis,
trench-parallel asthenospheric flow in the wedge, or even variable mantle viscosity could significantly
alter the upwelling pattern and thermal structure and in turn govern the ridge morphology and melt
chemistry. The "piracy" model also assumes that the subaxial melt generation region is wide and will
therefore begin to interact with the arc melt generation region when ridge-arc separation drops below
~100 km. While passive upwelling at the ridge would likely produce such a broad melt region, melt
generation via buoyancy-enhanced upwelling may concentrate low-density melt into a narrow, lowviscosity channel beneath the axis [e.g., Buck and Su, 1989]. In this case the subaxial melt region beneath
the ELSC would be too narrow to directly interact with arc melts.
These two end-member models, broad or narrow upwelling, predict different seismic signatures in
both velocity [Forsyth et al., 1998] and anisotropy [Blackman et al., 1996; 2002b]. The LABATTS and
MELT experiments measured seismic anomalies beneath the fast-spreading CLSC and the EPR that are
consistent with a broad zone of upwelling and melt production [Zhao et al., 1997; Forsyth et al., 1998;
Toomey et al., 1998; Hung et al., 2000; Dunn and Forsyth, 2003]. However, upwelling may develop into
3-D structures beneath ridges with slow spreading rates and/or low mantle viscosity [Parmentier and
Phipps Morgan, 1990; Magde and Sparks, 1997; Niu et al., 2001]. Mantle viscosity could be low beneath
the ELSC due to fluxing of slab fluids [Hirth and Kohlstedt, 1996] and regionally hot temperatures
[Kelley et al., 2003; Taylor and Martinez, 2003]. Coupled with a fairly slow spreading rate, this makes
the ELSC a far better candidate for buoyancy-enhanced upwelling than either of the other RIDGE2000
C-5
0426408
integrated study sites. Because the ELSC spans a crucial transition in seafloor roughness that is
interpreted to accompany changes in melt flux [Small and Sandwell, 1992; Ma and Cochran, 1997], it is
an excellent place to test both whether the ridge taps arc melts at depth and whether there is any 3-D
upwelling pattern.
We propose to determine the degree of
spatial interaction between arc and
backarc
spreading
center
magma
production regions using P, S, and
attenuation tomography. The presence of
melt can be distinguished by large Vp/Vs
ratios and from the magnitude of the
velocity anomalies [Hammond and
Humphreys, 2000a]. 3-D tomography will
delineate variations in the along-strike
shape and extent of the subaxial melt and
delineate arc-backarc connections in melt
supply and variations of that connectivity
along strike. For example, much lower
resolution P-wave tomography from the
LABATTS experiment (figure 5) shows
separate shallow magma production regions
for the CLSC and the Tonga arc, consistent
Figure 5. P-wave tomography of the Tonga subduction zone
and Lau backarc obtained from the LABATTS deployment
with the lack of subduction influence along
[Zhao et al., 1997]. Low P wave velocities delineate the
the CLSC. If the ELSC taps magma from
magma production zones of the Tonga arc and Central Lau
the arc source region, this should be
spreading Center. Circles show seismic sources. The proposed
observable in the tomography with a slow
experiment has a smaller station spacing, a 3-D layout, and will
Vp, but high Vp/Vs region extending
result in a much higher resolution 3-D image of structure along
deeper beneath the axis and possibly
the ELSC, the R2K IS site.
eastward to reflect the connection with the
arc magmas. It is not clear whether the “magma piracy” would occur through actual entrainment of arc
C-6
0426408
magmas or simply through enhanced melting and trace element transfer via slab released water. It may be
possible to seismically differentiate these models using the combined observations of attenuation, Vp, Vs,
and dlnVs/dlnVp [Wiens and Smith, 2003] as well as future experimental work on the effect of fluids on
mantle seismic properties.
3.3 Variations in the mantle melt supply control ridge crest features such as morphology, thermal
structure, and hydrothermal venting.
A fundamental hypothesis is that the strongly varying character of the ELSC, as shown in Figure 2, is
controlled by spatial variations in mantle melt flux and crustal melt storage beneath the ridge. Yet to date,
mantle melt flux and the crustal and sub-crustal accumulation of melt are very poorly known.
Questions related to the above hypothesis include: What controls the cross-sectional area of an axial
rise? The degree of axial inflation is inferred to reflect magma storage and hence supply [Scheirer and
Macdonald, 1993], yet may just reflect flexural effects due to thermal structure and cooling [Eberle and
Forsyth, 1998a,b, Shah and Buck, 2001]. What controls the formation of an axial rift versus an axial rise?
These large differences in ridge morphology are interpreted to be due to spreading-rate controlled
differences in thermal structures [Phipps Morgan et al., 1987; Phipps Morgan and Chen, 1993; Eberle
and Forsyth, 1998a,b, Shah and Buck, 2001], yet existing models are conflicted in the mechanism that
supports an axial high due to a lack of knowledge of a ridge's thermal structure for a rift versus a rise.
What controls the morphologic segmentation of the ridge? Overlapping and non-overlapping offsets
occur along the ELSC, such as near 20û50'S, ~21û20'S, and 22û15'S. Along the EPR the apparent volcanic
segmentation of the ridge [Haymon et al., 1991; Langmuir et al., 1986] has been correlated with
variations in mantle melt supply [Dunn et al., 2000, 2001], whereas larger overlapping offsets may be due
to tectonic stresses [Lonsdale, 1983; 1989; Dunn et al., 2001]. Is enhanced hydrothermal activity
correlated with enhanced melt supply along the Valu Fa Ridge? Enhanced hydrothermal output is often
attributed to higher melt flux, yet hydrothermal systems vary on short time scales and may not reflect
mantle melt flux differences or even crustal melt storage differences. Unfortunately, space does not
permit a more thorough discussion of these and other important questions.
The best indicator of the integrated melt flux over time is crustal thickness and arguably the best way
to determine crustal thickness is through a wide-angle refraction/reflection experiment. Furthermore, the
highest resolution constraints on melt content in the crust and sub-Moho mantle are currently determined
via high-resolution tomographic imaging [e.g., Dunn et al., 2000; 2001] (except for detailed images of
melt storage in the shallow melt lens obtained via MCS studies). Our proposed active-source experiment,
discussed below, has been carefully designed to image crustal thickness, thermal structure, and melt
content along the ELSC and to test the above hypothesis and answer its related questions. The experiment
will provide detailed images of the RIDGE2000 study site "bulls-eye" and images to the north and south
for direct comparison. The experiment is co-located with the passive-source experiment and provides a
crucial view of the connection between the near surface processes and the deeper mantle.
4. Proposed Data Collection
4.1 Passive broad-band survey and ridge crest microearthquake monitoring
The goals of the passive experiment (Figure 1) are to:
1) Provide 3-D body wave P, S, and attenuation tomographic images of the entire ELSC and Tonga
volcanic arc, with enhanced resolution near the “bullseye” for R2K studies and at another “magma
starved” location farther to the north.
2) Map the variation in mantle flow, as indicated by seismic anisotropy within the Lau mantle wedge.
Seismic anisotropy will be determined from shear wave splitting studies and from tomographic imaging
using surface waves traversing the array.
3) Map seismicity along the ridge crest to investigate ridge crest tectonic processes. Earthquake
locations and mechanisms will provide constraints on tectonic processes and earthquake depths will help
constrain thermal structure.
C-7
0426408
To achieve these goals we have designed an array of 55 OBSs that features two long, cross-axis lines
with closely spaced instruments within a larger, more widely spaced grid. One of the lines will be
centered on the location of the RIDGE2000 ISS “bull’s-eye”. The “bull’s-eye” is not yet determined (see
the Lau ISS Implementation plan on the RIDGE2000 web site), but will be determined in 2005 and is
likely to be near the known hydrothermal sites around 22ºS. The northern dense line of the passive survey
is designed to examine structure along the "magma starved" section of the ELSC and provide direct
comparison to the more "robust" but slower spreading southern section. The surrounding grid of OBSs is
necessary to accurately locate earthquakes within the subducting slab, fill in the three dimensional
tomographic map of the area, and map out variations of anisotropy. The body wave tomography will be
inherently 3-D due to the distribution of earthquake sources, but resolution will be enhanced along the
two dense lines. Instrument concentrations near the “bullseye” and near the intersection of the northern
line with the ridge crest will be sufficient to resolve microearthquake depths and locations to reasonable
precision (+ 500 m in location, + 1 km in depth).
The Tonga trench is the most seismically active region in the world, accounting for one quarter of the
intermediate and deep events worldwide. We expect to easily obtain sufficient slab earthquakes for the
passive tomography within the ten-month period, based on our experience with the previous experiment.
Note that ocean bottom seismometers have improved greatly since the LABATTS experiment a decade
ago, which was the first large experiment that used OBSs to study structure within the mantle. The new
OBSIP instruments have a much longer recording duration, lower noise levels on all three components
[e.g., Webb et al., 2001], and wider dynamic range (24 bit instead of 16 bits) thus eliminating the problem
of clipping for large events.
The OBS array will be augmented with five land broadband seismic stations on the adjacent Tongan
islands to increase the aperture of the array and to better locate small earthquakes necessary for
tomography at lower cost compared with installing further OBSs. These stations will be obtained from
the PASSCAL instrument center and will be installed and operated by Wiens, Conder, and Wash. Univ.
technical scientist Patrick Shore. All three have extensive experience installing and operating stations in
Tonga, and have a good working relationship with Tongan government officials.
4.2 Active Survey – Goals and Data Collection
One of our principle scientific objectives is to determine how variations in ridge crest structure and
processes may be related to variations in the underlying mantle melt supply and crustal melt
accumulation. To achieve this objective we will:
1) Map the seismic velocity structure of the uppermost mantle beneath a 250-km-long section of the
spreading center. By undershooting the spreading center with mantle Pn waves, we will image the mantle
velocity structure just beneath the crust-mantle interface to determine whether melt content is relatively
uniform or varies along the ridge. To first order, we will also measure the orientation and magnitude of
anisotropy in the uppermost mantle and estimate the general mantle flow direction.
2) Image the seismic velocity structure of the crust along this 250-km-long section of the ELSC. A
series of ridge-perpendicular seismic profiles spaced 24 km apart will image crustal melt storage and the
ridge thermal structure with crustal refractions and wide-angle Moho reflections. This includes for a
section of rifted ridge near 20û30'S and the section of rise along the Valu Fa, and thus provides strong
constraints for models of melt supply and rift/rise formation. Two high-resolution, ridge-parallel seismic
lines will image 250-km-long 2-D sections of the crust and uppermost mantle located 20 km to either side
of the ridge. We will also image spatial variations in crustal structure between these high-resolution
profiles using seismic energy that crosses between these lines.
3) Construct a map of crustal thickness variations along and across the spreading center. Wide-angle
reflections off the mantle will be recorded throughout the 250x40 km region of the experiment and
provide a map of crustal thickness variations throughout the region. Competing magma supply models
can be critically evaluated by correlating crustal thickness with other indicators of magma supply. In
addition, a crustal thickness map is necessary to remove the effects of crustal thickness on the mantleimaging portion of this experiment. Crustal structure and thickness measured along two long ridge-
C-8
0426408
perpendicular transects (Figure 1) will reveal the history of crustal accretion and hence melt flux for a
section of ridge with a rifted character versus a section with a rise.
The experiment consists of a grid of OBSs extending 250 km along the ELSC with a station spacing
of 10-12 km (Figure 2a); airgun shots will occur along ridge parallel and perpendicular lines. We will use
the same instrument and shot spacing as for the EPR UNDERSHOOT experiment except with additional
stations nearer the rise and more cross-axis shot lines for imaging the crust and obtaining better azimuthal
coverage in the mantle (see Results from Prior for R. Dunn). Additional shots will occur along the two
long ridge-perpendicular transects (Figure 1). On the basis of our experience with previous 3-D
tomography and undershooting studies [Dunn et al., 2000; Dunn et al., 2001; Christopher et al., 2003;
Dunn et al., 2003] and preliminary resolution tests (Figures 6-7), the proposed geometry will provide a
dense coverage of intersecting ray paths from a broad range of angles that will allow us to image 3-D
structure on a scale of 1-3 km in the crust (smaller values along the 2-D transects) and 2-4 km at upper
mantle depth.
5. Data Analysis
Our team has extensive experience successfully carrying out active-source and passive-source seismic
experiments and analyses and the modeling proposed here (see Prior Support section). In this section we
summarize some of those methods that we will apply to the data.
Figure 6: Our experiment will obtain profile and
planar-layer images of the crust and upper mantle
with higher resolution than this P-wave velocity
image from the EPR near 9û30'N. [Dunn et al.,
2000]. Velocity perturbations (with respect to a 1D model) are contoured at 0.2 km/s intervals.
Figure 7: Checkerboard resolution map of a
planar layer in the uppermost mantle, 8 km depth,
illustrates the high resolving power of the
proposed experiment geometry. For clarity we
only show the southern 85 km portion of the total
mantle plane.
5.1 Active Survey – Data Analysis
We will construct tomographic images of the crust and uppermost mantle using a new method [Dunn
et al., 2003] that solves for 2- or 3-D velocity structure, reflector (Moho) topography, and the magnitude
and orientation of seismic anisotropy (hexagonal symmetry system). We will use crustal refraction data to
test for shallow, crack-induced anisotropy due to lithospheric stretching [e.g., Dunn and Toomey, 2001;
Barclay et al. 1998] and mantle Pn data to constrain the magnitude and azimuth of uppermost mantle
anisotropy [e.g., Dunn et al., 1997; Dunn et al., 2001]. We will quantitatively examine any trade-offs
between isotropic velocity, crustal thickness, and anisotropy. The velocity images will be analyzed using
theoretical and experimentally derived relations for the effects of temperature and melt fraction on
seismic velocity to constrain the thermal structure and melt distribution beneath the spreading center. We
will integrate our results with the deeper mantle seismic images and other indicators of melt supply to
develop an integrated model of melt flux from its point of origin, up through the mantle, and into the
crustal storage reservoirs and to determine the origin of the large variations in ridge character.
C-9
0426408
5.2 Passive Body Wave Tomography
The dataset of P and S arrivals will be
inverted using iterative 3-D tomographic
methods. Crustal structure determined from
the active source part of this experiment will
be incorporated as a priori information. Rays
will be retraced and local earthquakes
relocated in the 3-D structure between
iterations for the structure model. We expect to
use inversion methods that solve for the P
structure and the P/S anomaly ratio [Conder
and Wiens, 2003]. Inter-station spacing ranges
from 10-30 km in the region of study, so a
resolution on the order of 25 km should be
obtainable.
P velocity, S velocity, and attenuation are
each sensitive to the temperature, melt content,
composition, and fluid content in different
ways [Roth et al., 2000; Wiens and Smith,
2003]. Attenuation has an exponential
dependence on temperature [Jackson et al.,
1992] while velocity has a largely linear Figure 8. Ray paths for a 9-month sample of Tonga
dependence.
Also, attenuation is largely earthquakes recorded by the global network. Green
insensitive to melt content [Hammond and triangles show proposed OBS array, straddling the
Humphreys,
2000b],
so
attenuation ELSC; black line marks trench; white/yellow circles
tomography (although of lower resolution) show shallow/intermediate depth earthquakes. Many
furnishes independent information on material additional slab earthquakes will be detected by the
properties [Roth et al., 2000]. Therefore, the OBS array so the total events available for tomography
best constraints on material properties result will be much greater than is shown here. Paths for
from the simultaneous interpretation of all teleseismic earthquakes (not shown) will also increase
three observables. Determining the P, S, and coverage.
attenuation structure with tomographic methods will be key to understanding the structure of the mantle
wedge and sub-ridge upwelling zone. 3-D P and S wave tomography will be performed using both
regional and teleseismic arrivals. We estimate that about 1500 well-located regional earthquakes will be
recorded during the ten-month deployment within 400 km of the array, which should provide about
50,000 arrival times at the OBS array.
5.3 Body wave analyses & seismic anisotropy
To test models of strain & fabric development associated with flow in the mantle, we will measure
the pattern of shear wave splitting times and apparent fast (P- and S-polarization) directions. Techniques
for measuring split shear waves in regions of simple azimuthal anisotropy are well developed [e.g.
Savage, 1999, Wolfe and Silver, 1998; Smith et al., 2001]. Of special interest for this study, however, is
determining whether the data require more complex patterns of anisotropy, such as are expected to
accompany 3-D flow [e.g. Hall et al., 2000; Blackman and Kendall, 2002] that could bias interpretations
based on simple assumptions [e.g. Chevrot and van der Hilst, 2003; Schulte-Pelkum and Blackman,
2003]. We will apply a newly developed data analysis method [Menke and Levin, 2003] to assess the
statistical significance of more complex scenarios. OBS orientations can be determined using well-located
earthquakes with an accuracy of ±5° RMS [Hung et al., 2000] so this is the precision for the anisotropy
orientations. Surface wave analyses (see next section) will also help constrain anisotropy, particularly its
vertical distribution.
C-10
0426408
The anisotropy results will be evaluated using flow modeling, texture estimates and synthetic
seismogram calculations. We will develop a series of flow models in which relevant parameters are varied
(e.g. viscosity, melting curves, effect of water, amount of along-trench flow) using temperature dependent
viscosity [e.g. Conder et al., 2002]. Both finite strain and poly-crystal plasticity methods will then be used
to estimate the mineral texturing (lattice preferred orientation); corresponding anisotropic elastic
constants will be computed, and the seismic response of each model will be estimated using Menke's
SPLITTING-MODELLER code.
Figure 9 illustrates how anisotropy developed during 2-D flow might differ from that for 3-D mantle
flow. A component of along-trench velocity is added to the 2-D Conder et al. (2002) model. A gradient in
the along-strike flow is assumed, higher in the north and reduced toward the south, to simulate influx of
Samoan plume material. The magnitude of the along-strike gradient is about 1/3 the maximum gradient in
the 2-D flow field. Linked numerical calculations (Blackman et al., 2002a) of evolution in
olivine:enstatite grain orientations along flowlines and corresponding effective elastic constants give local
P anisotropy and S splitting. Since the velocity gradients vary throughout the flow field, the anisotropy
also varies as the strength and orientation of the texture evolves. Changes in polarization direction of the
fast S-wave also vary but much of the model space is characterized by rotation from trench-perpendicular
(2D) to trench-parallel (3D), for near-vertical incident rays. Near the plates that drive the (2D) flow,
shallower rays show more rotation than steep rays.
C-11
0426408
Interpretation and modeling of anisotropy in the vicinity of plate boundaries is quite challenging; we
approach this portion of the project with a good understanding of the strengths and limitations of the
methods. Our plan is to conduct the data analysis hand in hand with preliminary modeling. Integration of
P, S, and surface wave data will consume a good portion of our efforts. Possible next steps might include:
1) adding the effect of texturing on the resulting flow field [Christensen, 1984]; 2) adding the effect of
melt on anisotropy [Schmeling, 1985; Faul et al., 1994; Kendall, 1994; Holtzman et al., 2003]. 3) adding
the effect of water on olivine alignment during flow [Jung and Karato, 2001]; a shift between dominant
glide systems, keyed to environmental parameters of the flow field, can be incorporated in our method. In
any case, our modeling will be guided by observed pattern of anisotropy.
5.4 Surface wave Analysis
Surface wave observations provide a robust means of mapping the shear velocity structure in the upper
mantle beneath the ELSC. We expect to detect along-axis variations in lithospheric thickness and in the
width and depth extent of the low-velocity zone associated with varying melt fractions and temperatures
beneath the ridge and above the subducting slab. Anisotropy constraints determined by combining Love
and Rayleigh wave observations are particularly important in constraining the depth of anisotropy, since
most body wave methods such as SKS splitting provide poor depth constraint. OBSs now routinely
produce good signal to noise ratio for Rayleigh waves at periods from 10 to 100s, [Weeraratne et al.,
2003] and for Love waves from 5 to 20s [Dunn and Forsyth, 2003], constraining structure in the
uppermost 150km for Rayleigh waves and uppermost 50-70km for Love waves. We will combine two
techniques: surface wave tomographic inversion applied to data from teleseismic events, and the new
method of Dunn and Forsyth, [2003] applied to short period Love and Rayleigh wave records from
regional events.
Phase velocities determined from analysis of surface waves from teleseismic events will provide
constraints on the larger scale and deeper structure. We will use one of several sophisticated methods for
inverting surface wave data collected with arrays have been developed in recent years [Friedrich, 1998;
Forsyth et al, 1998; Laske et al., 1999]. In general these methods involve solving for the back azimuth of
the incoming wavefront as a function of frequency, some methods allow for multiple plane waves to
correct for multipathing before determining the frequency-dependent inter-station phase velocities. An
azimuthal dependence to the phase velocities indicates azimuthal anisotropy.
We will also use the method of Dunn and Forsyth [2003] to model short-period Love and Rayleigh
waveforms of 0.02-0.2 Hz (<0.07 Hz for Rayleigh waves due to water column interference). With
sufficient station density, as proposed here, this method actually exploits the waveform complexities from
multi-pathing to strongly constrain details of mantle structure at scales of 10 to 20km (figure 10). The
method models group, phase, and amplitude variations across the array, which are sensitive indicators of
velocity variations beneath the ridge. A new version of this method allows for three-dimensional
solutions. Ray paths that arrive from a wide range of azimuths will reveal both across- and along-axis
variations in asthenospheric and lithospheric structure.
Figure 10. Shear velocity image
of the southern EPR illustrating
the resolution attainable for
imaging lithospheric thickness
and the upwelling zone using
short-period
surface
waves.
(Ridge axis located at x=0 km;
image is oriented perpendicular to
the ridge.) Importantly, sharp
variations in velocity structure on
the 10-20 km scale can be
resolved with this method.
(Compare with Figure 5 and note
the difference in size of regions
imaged.)
C-12
0426408
5.5 Local Seismicity
The ten-month passive array deployment will provide one of the best records of seismicity along a
ridge segment yet obtained by any experiment. The inter-element spacing (12-15 km) near the axis is
sufficient to accurately (<0.5km) locate all significant tectonic events along the segment. The spreading
rates seen along the ELSC (40-90 mm/yr) reflect a range of rates between slow and intermediate ridges.
Large events are rare on fast spreading ridges because much of the crust is too hot to exhibit brittle
behavior whereas large tectonic events are common at slow ridges. Several studies suggests a systematic
variation in the style of faulting [Shaw and Lin, 1993] and depth of events beneath slow-spreading ridge
segments with deeper events found near the colder ends of segments [eg. Toomey et al., 1985; Kong et al.,
1992] although not all such studies show this trend [e.g., Wolfe et al., 1995]. Along the ELSC ridge the
apparent magmatic robustness of the southern section would suggest a hotter thermal structure and
shallow events. Some earthquakes from the ELSC have been detected at land seismic stations in Tonga.
Earthquakes will be located first using a simple 1-D velocity model with hypocenter estimates further
improved by tracing rays through the 3-D model from the tomographic refraction experiment [eg. Sohn et
al., 2004]. Where possible we will use cross correlation techniques to improve hypocentral (relative
location) accuracies [e.g., Golden et al., 2003 Sohn et al., 1998]. Focal mechanisms for the larger events
would be determined using both P-wave and S-wave arrivals and amplitude ratios [Shen et al., 1997].
The array could provide a clear record of dike propagation should we be fortunate enough to see such
a volcanic event during the array deployment. We know
Cruise Plan: Deployment Leg
of a proposal to deploy hydrophone arrays in the Lau
Leave Nuku’alofa for 1st OBS site
0.5 d
Basin. The hydrophone array would provide accurately
Deploy 55 OBSs for southern half 6.5 d
locations of shallow events, with small T-wave source
of active source array:
region, throughout the Lau Basin, but would provide
Southern Refraction lines
8d
little constraint on focal depth, and none on earthquake
Recover 26 OBS and redeploy for 9 d
mechanism. The OBS array would provide significant
northern lines
ground truthing of the hydrophone-based results and
Shoot northern lines
6d
allow a calibration of earthquake moment versus
Recover 19 OBSs and redeploy to 7 d
amplitude at the hydrophones if deployed
fill out passive array
simultaneously.
Shoot southern refraction line
1.5 d
6. Logistics and Work Plan
Return Nuku’alofa:
0.5 d
Combining the active and passive experiments into
Total
39 d
one set of cruises minimizes costs by 1) using two legs
instead of 3 or 4 and 2) using the same OBSs for both arrays avoiding a duplication of costs for ship time,
instrument preparation, personnel, expendables (batteries) and shipping. The closest port to the study site
is Nuku’alofoa, Tonga. This small port has container ship service. We require the R/V Ewing (or its
replacement) during the first leg, which will require 39 days of shiptime (Table 1). Any large ship will be
suitable for the 15 day recovery leg that will follow the first by ten months
The active experiment consists of one large central corridor and two long refraction lines. We will
shoot to OBSs at 90 locations along about 1900 km of refraction lines. To accomplish this with 55 OBSs
we will split the main array into overlapping northern and southern segments and shoot these, and the
southern cross-axis line separately. Shots will be spaced 2.5 minutes apart (about 500m at 4.5 kts). There
is voluminous evidence that the best refraction data is obtained when water column reverberations are
allowed to dissipate between shots. Our plan shifts OBSs between sites in three steps. We use many
common sites between the passive and active arrays to minimize the number of OBSs moved. The
experiment will require 100 deployments of OBSs, so that 45 OBSs will need to be redeployed during leg
1. We will shift sampling rates from 125 Hz for the active source work to 40 Hz for the passive
experiment. We used current OBSIP guidelines for deployment times and a ship speed of 10 knts to
calculate the time required for OBS operations. The pickup cruise will occur about 10 months following
the deployment and is budgeted in the 2nd grant year. The data will be entered in databases during the 2nd
year. The active source experiment airgun lines are restricted to deep water (>2000m). Recent Ewing
C-13
0426408
airgun source measurements show that in deep water, source levels fall very quickly with range and this is
expected to minimize the potential impact of the airguns on marine mammals. So although whales are
present in Lau basin, we expect it should be possible to obtain the necessary permits for the cruise.
During the cruise, we will follow established rules and guidelines for the protection of marine mammals.
Division of Tasks Amongst Collaborators.
Washington University: Doug Wiens will coordinate the passive part of the experiment, and will take
the lead on the body and surface wave tomographic analysis and deployment of the land stations in
Tonga. James Conder will develop mantle flow and melting models for comparison with anisotropy and
tomographic results and will assist on the body wave tomography. University of Hawaii: Rob Dunn will
take the lead on the active source part of the experiment and he will supervise the active source data
analysis. He will also lead the analysis of short-period surface waves. LDEO: Spahr Webb and Bill
Menke will take the lead on orienting the OBSs and performing the body wave anisotropy analyses.
Webb will interface with the OBSIP on OBS technical issues. LDEO will work with Washington
University on the body wave and surface wave tomography. LDEO will collaborate with Blackman to
model wave propagation in predicted anisotropic structure for a few flow/texture models. LDEO will
work on ridge crest seismicity. Scripps: Donna Blackman will coordinate flow modeling with James
Conder and work with LDEO to incorporate anisotropy observations into textural modeling. Elastic
constants will be predicted for inclusion in wave propagation models for comparison with the data.
7. Broader Impacts
This project will make valuable contributions to scientific infrastructure. New seismic imaging
methods and models will be developed and ultimately distributed for use by the community via
publication and PI websites. The data sets we collect are substantive and will become part of the R2K
Integrated Study Site database that is available to the broader community and will provide productive
research in many areas for years to come. Both the land station data and OBS data will be made available
through the IRIS data management center. The proposed research is intended to play an important role in
accomplishing the goals of the RIDGE2000 science program. RIDGE2000 is a NSF-funded program
whose mandate is to focus funds and expertise on the interdisciplinary investigation of fundamental ridgerelated problems on scales ranging from mantle convection to microbe activity. By accomplishing the
goals of our proposal, our work will broadly impact a wide-range of scientific disciplines.
Development of human resources in the form of graduate and undergraduate student training is an
important outgrowth of this proposal. Dunn and Wiens will incorporate undergraduate interns in various
aspects of the work. These students will gather and analyze data and will be introduced to seismic
imaging methods. Students will be chosen from through the IRIS, NSF or other education and outreach
programs. Many of the students that will be involved represent groups that are historically
underrepresented in science. For example, most U. of Hawaii undergraduates are residents of Hawaii and
represent an ethnically diverse student body (19% Caucasian, 9% Filipino, 11% Native Hawaiian, 23%
Japanese, 38% mixed or other), and most of the seismology graduate students at Washington University
are female. It is intended that the laboratory and scholarly activities of each of the PIs will deepen the
participation of these underrepresented groups in earth science. We will also work with Liz Goehring at
the RIDGE office on outreach programs for K-12 and the general public. The Ridge office arranged for a
science writer to work with the initial Lau cruises and we would seek continuing participation by her or
another writer on our cruise, and seek to maintain a web site of ongoing Lau R2K activities.
This project will strengthen scientific ties to the kingdom of Tonga and will help raise that nation’s
scientific capabilities. Washington University has a long-standing collaborative relationship with the
Ministry of Lands, Survey, and Natural Resources of Tonga. Several Tongan scientists have traveled as
observers on the LABATTS cruises, have visited Washington University in the past, and would be invited
to join the proposed cruises. The kingdom of Tonga is currently installing a small seismic monitoring
network and Washington University personnel will assist Tongan scientists in their cataloging of seismic
activity in Tonga.
C-14
0426408
8. Results from Prior Support
D. A. Wiens EAR-9219675, $317,451, 5/1/93-10/31/97, "A passive broadband seismic experiment for study of
subduction zone and back-arc structure and tectonics in the S. Pacific" OCE-931446, $147,979, 6/1/94-5/31/98,
"Seismic study of the Lau back-arc spreading center and Tonga Island Arc using OBSs". These grants funded a twoyear deployment of eleven broadband digital seismic stations in the Southwest Pacific (SPASE), and a coincident
90-day deployment of 30 ocean bottom seismographs in the Lau back-arc (LABATTS). Our group has published 16
peer-reviewed papers resulting from this project. Regional Waveform inversion suggests upper mantle velocity
heterogeneity of up to 16%, with exceptionally slow seismic velocities in the backarc basins, extending to depths of
at least 200 km [Xu and Wiens, 1997]. Seismic tomography clearly images a slab, and suggests that slow velocity
anomalies extend to depths of 400 km beneath the backarc spreading center [Zhao et al, 1997]. The ratios of S to P
anomalies in the backarc are consistent with that expected for thermal anomalies but suggest only very limited
presence of partial melt [Koper et al., 1999]. Attenuation tomography shows a low Q zone beneath the Lau
spreading center [Roth et al, 1999a]. Comparison of attenuation and velocity tomographic images provides an
empirical relationship between δV and δQ that is consistent with lab results [Roth et al., 2000]. Shear wave splitting
results indicate a complex pattern of mantle flow in the Lau backarc, including inflow beneath the backarc from the
north [Smith et al., 2001]. The large 1994 deep earthquake shows that the mainshock rupture zone and aftershocks
can extend outside the active Benioff zone [Wiens et al., 1994; Wiens 2001].
R. A. Dunn OCE-01-17715; $92,121; 09/01/01-8/31/03; Collaborative Research: Constraining mantle flow, melt
supply, and lower crustal structure between the Clipperton and Siqueiros Fracture Zones from a seismic undershoot
experiment. (R. Dunn, R. Detrick; D. Toomey; W. Wilcock) The UNDERSHOOT experiment was designed to map
the pattern of magma delivery from the mantle to the crust along the length of a transform-bounded segment of the
East Pacific Rise. We found that at both crustal and mantle depth the EPR is underlain by a continuous low-velocity
region. The results indicate that mantle flow and melt supply are broadly uniform along a section of ridge bounded
by transform offsets. However, short wavelength variations (10-20 km scale) in the magnitude of the low-velocity
zone suggest the presence of short-lived regions of enhanced melt flux into the crust [e.g., Nicholas et al., 1994]. We
did not find evidence that OSCs reflect reductions in the underlying magma supply [Dunn et al., 2001; Christopher
et al., 2003; Toomey et al., 2003; Jousselin et al., 2003]. Other publications: Dunn and Forsyth, [2003]; Cherkaoui
et al., [2003].
Donna K. Blackman, OCE-9812560 9/98-8/00, $93,54, Project Title: Constructing a comprehensive seismological
model of the EPR near the MELT experiment (co-PIs D. Forsyth & D. Toomey). We developed of self-consistent
flow and texturing models to explain observed seismic velocity and anisotropy patterns in the MELT EPR
experiment. Texturing methodologies, effects of recrystallization, and influence of 3-D flow were tested, and a
series of EPR models were investigated. We confirmed that some models could be ruled out. We illustrated cases
where finite strain estimates of anisotropy do/don't match more complete estimates from polycrystal texturing
[Blackman et al., 2002a; 2002b].
Spahr C. Webb, Spahr C. Webb and Wayne C. Crawford, OCE-9819159, Measuring Crustal and Moho Melt
Beneath the EPR, 910 N, Using Seafloor Compliance, $282,088. The compliance technique detects regions of low
shear modulus and data collected along the EPR [Crawford and Webb, 2002] reveal an asymmetric lower crustal
melt zone beneath the axis between 9û and 10ûN comparable in width to that inferred from seismic tomography. The
zone shifts west of the rise axis as the rise approaches the westward-stepping 9û03'N OSC and is anomalously wide
at the northern tip of the discontinuity. The measurements reveal a lower crustal melt zone 10 km off axis that is
isolated from the axial melt body These Moho melt lenses are found at several locations both on and off-axis. The
results suggests that the mantle melt supply controls the existence and location of crustal melt, but crustal processes
provide the final control on the size and shape of the lower crustal melt zone.
William Menke, OCE-11965; $304,958; 08/15/98-11/30/00; Active Seismic Imaging of Axial Volcano; W. Menke
& M. Tolstoy. Axial Volcano and the Juan de Fuca Ridge provide an excellent opportunity to study the interplay
between active "hot spot" and "mid-ocean ridge" magmatic systems. The purpose of this research was to investigate
the interconnectedness (or interaction) between these systems through the tomographic imaging of the region using
seismic data from an active seismic airgun-to-obs experiment. The key elements of the new three-dimensional Pwave velocity model of the Axial and Coaxial magma systems are: 1. A large Axial magma chamber; A smaller
Coaxial Magma Chamber, unconnected with the one at Axial; 3. Several small low velocity zones are possibly
outlier magma chambers from Axial; 4. Thickening of the crust beneath Axial. The crust thickens from about 6 km
far from Axial to 8 km near Axial to 11 km beneath the summit [West, 2001].
C-15
0426408
References
Andrews, D.J., and N.H. Sleep, Numerical modelling of tectonic flow behind island arcs, Geophys J. R.
Astr. Soc., 38, 237-251, 1974
Barclay, A.H., D.R. Toomey, and S.C. Solomon, Seismic structure and crustal magmatism at the MidAtlantic Ridge, 35°N, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,827-17,844, 1998.
Blackman, D.K., Kendall, J-M., Dawson, P.R., Wenk, H-R., Boyce, D., Phipps Morgan, J. Teleseismic
imaging of subaxial flow at mid-ocean ridges: travel-time effects of anisotropic mineral texture in the
mantle, Geophys. J. Intl. 127, 415-426, 1996.
Blackman, D.K., H-R. Wenk, J-M. Kendall, Seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle: 1. Factors that affect
mineral texture and effective elastic properties, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 2002a.
Blackman, D.K. and J.-M. Kendall, Seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle: 2. Predictions for current
plate boundary flow models, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 3, 8602, doi: 10.1029/2001GC000247,
2002b.
Bortnikov, N.S., D.T. Federov, and K.G. Murav’ev, Mineral composition and conditions of the formation
of sulfide edifices in the Lau Basin (southwestern sector of the Pacific Ocean), Geo. Ore Deposits, 35,
476-488, 1993.
Buck, R. and W. Su, Focused mantle upwelling below mid-ocean ridges due to feedback between
viscosity and melting, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 641-644, 1989
Buttles, J., and P. Olson, A laboratory model of subduction zone anisotropy, Earth Plan. Sci. Lett., 164,
245-262, 1998
Carbotte, S.M., C. Small, and K. Donnelly, The influence of ridge migration on the magmatic
segmentation of mid-ocean ridges, EOS Trans. AGU, 84(46), Fall Meeting Suppl., Abstract, 2003 and
submitted to Nature.
Cherkaoui, A.S.M., W.S.D. Wilcock, R.A. Dunn, and D.R. Toomey, A numerical model of hydrothermal
cooling and crustal accretion at a fast spreading mid-ocean ridge, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 4(9),
8616, doi:10.1029/2001GC000215, 2003.
Chevrot, S. and R.D. van der Hilst, On the effects of a dipping axis of symmetry on shear wave splitting
measurements in a transversely isotropic medium, Geophys. J. Intl. 152, 497-505, 2003.
Christensen, N.I., The magnitude, symmetry, and origin of upper mantle anisotropy based on fabric
analyses of ultramafic tectonites, Geoph. J. Roy. Ast. Soc. 76, 89-111, 1984.
Christopher, L.M., R.A. Dunn, D. Toomey, W. Wilcock, R. Detrick, Crustal Seismic Structure along the
East Pacific Rise 8°20'N to 10°10'N: Crustal melt accumulation and its relation to Mantle Melt
Delivery, Tectonic Segmentation, Seafloor Geology and Hydrothermal Activity, Eos Trans. AGU
Suppl., 2003.
Collier, J.S., and M.C. Sinha, Seismic mapping of a magma chamber beneath the Valu Fa Ridge, Lau
Basin, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 14,031-14053, 1992.
Conder, J.A., and D.A. Wiens, Vp/Vs tomography of the Central Lau Spreading Center and Tonga
Volcanic Arc, Eos Trans AGU Suppl., 2003
Conder, J.A., D.W. Forsyth, and E. M. Parmentier, Asthenospheric flow and the asymmetry of the East
Pacific Rise, MELT area, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2344, doi:10.1029/2001JB000807, 2002a
Conder, J.A., D.A. Wiens, and J. Morris, On the decompression melting structure at volcanic arcs and
back-arc spreading centers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, doi:10.1029/2002GL015390, 2002b
Crawford, W.C., and S.C. Webb, Removing tilt noise from low frequency (<0.1 Hz) seafloor vertical
seismic data, Bull. Seismo. Soc. Amer., 90, 952-963, 2000.
Crawford, W.C. and S.C. Webb, Variations in the distribution of magma in the lower crust and at the
Moho beneath the East Pacific Rise at 9-10N, Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 203, 117-130, 2002
Davies, J.H. and D.J. Stevenson, Physical model of source region of subduction zone volcanics, J.
Geophys. Res., 97, 2037-2070, 1992
Dunn, R.A., and D.W. Forsyth, Imaging the transition between the region of mantle melting and the
crustal magma chamber beneath the southern East Pacific Rise with short-period Love waves, J.
0426408
Geophys. Res., 108, 2352, doi:10.1029/2002JB002217, 2003.
Dunn, R.A. and D.R. Toomey, Seismological evidence for three-dimensional melt migration beneath the
East Pacific Rise, Nature, 388, 259-262, 1997.
Dunn, R.A., and D.R. Toomey, Crack-induced seismic anisotropy in the oceanic crust across the East
Pacific Rise (9°30'N), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 189, 9-17, 2001.
Dunn, R.A., D.R. Toomey, and S.C. Solomon, Three-dimensional seismic structure and physical
properties of the crust and shallow mantle beneath the East Pacific Rise at 9 30'N, J. Geophys. Res.,
105, 23,537-23,555, 2000.
Dunn, R.A., V. Lekic, D. Toomey, R. Detrick, Imaging the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the MidAtlantic Ridge (35N) with P-wave tomography, AGU-EGS-EUG Meeting, Nice, France, 2003.
Dunn, R.A., D.R. Toomey, R.S. Detrick, and W.S.D. Wilcock, Continuous mantle melt supply beneath an
overlapping spreading center on the East Pacific Rise, Science, 291, 1955-1958, 2001.
Eberle, M.A., and D.W. Forsyth, An alternative, dynamic model of the axial topographic high at fastspreading ridges, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12,309-12,320, 1998.
Eberle, M.A., and D.W. Forsyth, Evidence from the asymmetry of fast-spreading ridges that the axial
topographic high is due to extensional stresses, Nature, 394, 360-363, 1998a.
Eberle, M.A., D.W. Forsyth, and E.M. Parmentier, Constraints on a buoyant model for the formation of
the axial topographic high on the East Pacific Rise, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12,291-12,307, 1998b.
Faul, U.H., Toomey, D.R., Waff, H.S., Intergranular basaltic melt is distributed in thin, elongated
inclusions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 29-32, 1994.
Forsyth, D.W., S.C. Webb, L.M. Dorman, and Y. Shen, Phase velocities of Rayleigh waves in the MELT
experiment on the East Pacific Rise, Science, 280, 1235-1238, 1998
Forsyth, D.W., et al., Imaging the deep seismic structure beneath a mid-ocean ridge: The MELT
experiment, Science, 280, 1215-1218, 1998.
Fouquet, Y., U.V. Stackelberg, J.L. Charlou, J. Erzinger, P.M. Herzig, R. Muhe, and M. Wiedicke,
Metallogenesis in back-arc environments: The Lau Basin example, Economic Geology, 88, 21542181, 1993.
Friederich, W., Wave-theoretical inversion of teleseismic surface waves in a regional network: phasevelcity maps and a three-dimensional upper mantle shear-wave velocity model for southern Germany,
Geophys. J. Int., 132, 203-225, 1998.
Golden, C.E., S.C. Webb, and R.A. Sohn, Hydrothermal microearthuake swarms beneath active vents at
Middle Valley, northern Juan de Fuca Ridge, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2003
Hall, C.E., K.M. Fischer, E.M. Parmentier, D.K. Blackman, the influence of plate motions on three
dimensional back-arc mantle flow and shear wave splitting, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 28,009-28,034,
2000.
Hammond, W.C., and E.D. Humphreys, Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: Effects of realistic partial
melt geometries, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 10,975-10,986, 2000a.
Hammond, W.C., and E.D. Humphreys, Upper mantle seismic wave attenuation: Effects of realistic
partial melt distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 10,987-11,000, 2000b.
Harding, A.J., G.M. Kent, and J.A. Collins, Initial results from a multichannel seismic survey of the Lau
back-arc basin, Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 81, 1115, 2000.
Hawkins, J. W., Petrology and geochemistry of basaltic rocks of the Lau Basin, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,
28, 283-297, 1976.
Haymon, R.M., D.J. Fornari, M.H. Edwards, S. Carbotte, D. Wright, and K.C. Macdonald, Hydrothermal
vent distribution along the East Pacific Rise crest (9û09-54'N) and its relationship to magmatic and
tectonic processes on fast-spreading mid-ocean ridges, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 104, 513-534, 1991.
Herzig, P., M.D. Hannington, Y. Fouquet, U.v. Stackelberg, and S. Petersen, Gold-rich polymetallic
sulfides from the Lau back arc and implications for the geochemistry of gold in sea-floor hydrothermal
systems of the Southwest Pacific, Econ. Geol, 88, 2182-2209, 1993.
Hirth, G., and D.L. Kohlstedt, Water in the oceanic upper mantle: implications for rheology, melt
extraction and the evolution of the lithosphere, Earth Plan. Sci. Lett., 144, 93-108, 1996.
0426408
Hochstaedter, A., J. Gill, R. Peters, P. Broughton, P. Holden, and B. Taylor, Across-arc geochemical
trends in the Izu-Bonin arc; contributions from the subducting slab, G-cubed, 2000GC000105, 2001.
Holtzman, B.K., and D.L., Kohlstedt, Melt segregation and strain partitioning; implications for seismic
anisotropy and mantle flow, Science, 301, 1227-1230, 2003.
Hung, S.-H., D.W. Forsyth, and D. R. Toomey, Can a narrow, melt-rich, low-velocity zone of mantle
upwelling be hidden beneath the East Pacific Rise? Limits from waveform modeling and the MELT
experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2000.
Jackson I., M.S., Paterson, and J.D. FitzGerald, Seismic wave dispersion and attenuation in Ǻheim dunite:
an experimental study. Geophys. J. Int., 108, 517-534, 1992.
Jacobs, A.M., A.J. Harding, G.M. Kent, and J.A. Collins, Along-axis crustal structure of the Lau back-arc
basin from multichannel seismic observations, Eos Trans AGU Fall Meeting Suppl., 2003.
Jousselin, D., R. Dunn, D. Toomey, Modeling the seismic signature of structural data from the Oman
Ophiolite: Can a mantle diapir be detected beneath the East Pacific Rise?, G-cubed, 2003.
Jung, H. and S.-I. Karato, Water-induced fabric transitions in olivine, Science 293, 2001.
Kelley, K.A., T. Plank, S. Newman, E. Stolper, T. Grove, S. Parman, and E. Hauri, Mantle melting as a
function of water in subduction zones, SOTA, Program with Abstracts, 2003
Kendall, J-M. Teleseismic arrivals at a mid-ocean ridge: effects of mantle melt and anisotropy. Geophys.
Res. Lett., 21, 301-304, 1994.
Kincaid, C., and I.S. Sacks, Thermal and dynamical evolution of the upper mantle in subduction zones, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 12,295-12,315, 1997.
Kincaid, C., and R.W. Griffiths, Laboratory models of the thermal evolution of the mantle during rollback
subduction, Nature, 425, 58-62, 2003
Kong, L.S., S.C. Solomon, and G.M. Purdy, Microearthquakes characteristics of a mid-ocean ridge
along-axis, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 1659-1685, 1992.
Koper, K.D., D.A. Wiens, L.M. Dorman, J.A. Hildebrand, and S.C. Webb, Constraints on the origin of
slab and mantle wedge anomalies in Tonga from the ratio of S to P anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 104,
15,089-15,104, 1999.
Langmuir, C.H., J.F. Bender, and R. Batiza, Petrological and tectonic segmentation of the East Pacific
Rise, 5û30'-14û30'N, Nature, 322, 422-429, 1986.
Laske, G., J. Phipps Morgan, and J. A. Orcutt, First results from the Hawaiian SWELL pilot experiment,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3397-3400, 1999.
Lekic, V., Dunn, R.A., D. Toomey, R. Detrick, Shallow mantle and crustal structure beneath the MidAtlantic Ridge (35°N): melt supply and crustal construction, Eos Trans. AGU, Fall Meeting Suppl.,
2003.
Lonsdale, P., Overlapping rift zones at the 5.5°S offset of the East Pacific Rise,J. Geophys. Res. 88, 9393,
1983.
Lonsdale, P., Segmentation of the Pacific-Nazca spreading center, 1 degree N-20 degrees S, J. Geophys.
Res., 94, 12197-12,225, 1989.
Lonsdale, P., Geomorphology and structural segmentation of the crest of the southern (Pacific-Antarctic)
East Pacific Rise, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 4683-4702, 1994.
Ma, L.Y. and J.R. Cochran, Bathymetric roughness of the Southeast Indian Ridge: Implications for
crustal accretion at intermediate spreading rate mid-ocean ridges, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 17697-17711,
1997
Madsen, J.A., D.W. Forsyth, and R.S. Detrick, A new isostatic model for the East Pacific Rise crest, J.
Geophys. Res., 89, 9997-10015, 1984.
Magde, L.S., R.S. Detrick, the TERA Group, Crustal and upper mantle contribution to the axial gravity
anomaly at the southern East Pacific Rise, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3747-3766, 1995.
Magde, L.S. and D.W. Sparks, Three-dimensional mantle upwelling, melt generation and melt migration
beneath segmented slow-spreading ridges, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 20,571-20,583, 1997.
Mainprice D., and P.G. Silver, Interpretation of SKS-waves using samples from the subcontinental
lithosphere, Phys. Earth Plan. Int., 78, 257-280, 1993.
0426408
Malinverno, A., Transition between a valley and a high at the axis of mid-ocean ridges, Geology, 21, 639642, 1993
Martinez, F., and B. Taylor, Mantle wedge control on back-arc crustal accretion, Nature, 416, 417-420,
2002.
Martinez, F., and B. Taylor, Controls on back-arc accretion: insights from the Lau, Manus and Mariana
basins, in Intra-Oceanic Subduction Systems: Tectonic and Magmatic Processes (eds. R.D. Larter and
P.T. Leat), Geol. Soc.London, Special Pubs, 219, 19-54, 2003.
McKenzie, D., Finite deformation during fluid flow, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 58, 689-715. 1979.
Menke, W. and V. Levin, The Cross-Convolution Method for Interpreting SKS Splitting Observations,
with Application to One and Two Layer Anisotropic Earth Models, Geophys. J. Int., in press, 2004
Nicholas, A. and N.I. Christensen, Formation of anisotropy in upper mantle peridotite, A review,
Geodynamics Ser., 16, 111-123, 1987.
Niu, Y., D. Bideau, R. Hekinian, and R. Batiza, Mantle compositional control on the extent of mantle
melting, crust production, gravity anomaly, ridge morphology, and ridge segmentation: a case study at
the Mid-Atlantic Ridge 33-35°N, Earth Plan Sci. Lett., 186, 383-399, 2001
Parmentier, E.M. and J. Phipps Morgan, Spreading rate dependence of three-dimensional structure in
oceanic spreading centres, Nature, 348, 325-328, 1990
Pearce, J.A., M.Ernewein, S.H. Bloomer, L.M. Parson, B.J. Murton, and L.E. Johnson, Geochemistry of
Lau Basin volcanic rocks: influence of ridge segmentation and arc proximity, in Volcanism Associated
with Extension at Consuming Plate Margins, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 81, 53-75, 1995.
Peate, D.W., T.F. Kokfelt, C.J. Hawkesworth, P.W. Van Calsteren, J.M. Hergt, and J.A. Pearce, U-series
isotope data on Lau Basin glasses: the role os subduction-related fluids during melt generation in
back-arc basins, J. Petrology, 42, 1449-1470, 2001.
Phipps Morgan, J., The generation of a compositional lithosphere by mid-ocean ridge melting and its
effect on subsequent off-axis hotspot upwelling and melting, Earth Plan. Sci. Lett., 146, 213-232,
1997.
Phipps Morgan, J. and Y. Chen, The genesis of oceanic crust: magma injection, hydrothermal circulation,
and crustal flow, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 6283-6297, 1993.
Phipps Morgan, J., E. M. Parmentier, and J. Lin, Mechanisms for the origin of mid-ocean ridge axial
topography: Implications for the thermal and mechanical structure of accreting plate boundaries, J.
Geophys. Res., 92, 12,823-12,836, 1987
Ribe, N.M., Mantle flow induced by back arc spreading, Geophys. J. Int., 98, 85-91, 1989
Roth, E.G., D.A. Wiens, L.M. Dorman, J. Hildebrand, and S.C. Webb, Seismic attenuation tomography of
the Tonga-Fiji region using phase pair methods, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 4795-4810, 1999.
Roth, E.G., D.A. Wiens, and D. Zhao, An empirical relationship between seismic attenuation and velocity
anomalies in the upper mantle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 601-604, 2000.
Savage, M.K., Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: what have we learned from shear wave
splitting, Rev. Geophys., 37, 65-106, 1999.
Scheirer, D.S. and K.C. Macdonald, Variation in cross-sectional area of the axial ridge along the East
Pacific Rise: Evidence for the magmatic budget of a fast spreading center, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 78717885, 1993.
Schmeling, H., Numerical models on the influence of partial melt on elastic, anelastic and electric
properties of rocks, part II, Elasticity and anelasticity, Physics Earth Planet. Int. 41, 34-57, 1985.
Schulte-Pelkum, V. and D.K. Blackman, A synthesis of seismic P and S anisotropy, Geophys. J. Intl. 54,
166-178, 2003
Shah, A.K. and W.R. Buck, Causes for axial high topography at mid-ocean ridges and the role of crustal
thermal structure, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 30,865-30,879, 2001.
Shah, A.K. and W.R. Buck, Plate bending stresses at axial highs, and implications for faulting behavior,
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 211, 343-356, 2003.
Shaw, P.R. and J. Lin, Causes and consequences of variations in faulting style at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge,
J. Geophys. Res., 98, 21,839-21,851, 1993.
0426408
Small, C. and D.T. Sandwell, An analysis of ridge axis gravity roughness and spreading rate, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 3235-3245, 1992
Smith, G.P., D.A. Wiens, K.M. Fischer, L.M. Dorman, S.C. Webb, and J.A. Hildebrand, A complex
pattern of mantle flow in the Lau backarc, Science, 292, 713-716, 2001.
Shen, Y. D.W. Forsyth, J. Conder, L.R. Dorman- Investigation of microearthquake activity following an
intraplate teleseismic swarm on the west flank of the southern East Pacific Rise, J. Geophys. Res, 102,
459-475, 1997.
Sohn, R.A., A.H. Barclay, and S.C. Webb, "Microearthquake patterns following the 1998 Eruption of
Axial Volcano, Juan de Fuca Ridge: Mechanical and Thermal Strain", J. Geophys. Res., 2004, in
press.
Sohn, R.A., D.J. Fornari, K.L. VonDamm, J.A. Hidlebrand, and S.C. Webb, Seismic ad hydrothermal
evidence for a cracking event on the East Pacific Rise crest near 9-50N, Nature, 396, 158-161, 1998
Stolper, E., and S. Newman, The role of water in the petrogenesis of Mariana trough magmas, EPSL, 121,
293-325, 1994
Toomey, D.R., S.C. Solomon, and G.M. Purdy, Microearthquakes beneath the median valley of the MAR
near 23 N, hypocenters and focal mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5444-5458, 1985.
Toomey, D. R., W. S. D. Wilcock, S. C. Solomon, W. C. Hammond, and J. A. Orcutt, Mantle seismic
structure beneath the MELT region of the East Pacific Rise from P and S wave tomography, Science,
280, 1224-1227, 1998
Toomey, D.R., R.A. Dunn, W.S. Wilcock, R.S. Detrick, Mantle Structure Beneath the East Pacific Rise
and its Relation to Tectonic Segmentation, Axial Morphology and Hydrothermal Activity (abstract),
Eos Trans AGU, 84, Fall Meeting Suppl., 2003.
Turner, S., and C. Hawkesworth, Using geochemistry to map mantle flow beneath the Lau Basin,
Geology, 26, 1019-1022, 1998.
Vallier, T.L., G.A. Jenner, F.A. Frey, J.B. Gill, A.M. Volpe, J.W. Hawkins, J.D. Morris, P.A. Cawood,
J.L. Morton, D.W. Scholl, M. Rautenschlein, W.M. White, R.W. Williams, A.J. Stevenson, and L.D.
White, Subalkaline andesite from Valu Fa Ridge, a back-arc spreading center in the southern Lau
Basin; petrogenesis, comparative chemistry,and tectonic implications, Chem. Geol., 91, 227-256,
1991.
Webb, S.C., T.K. Deaton, and J.C. Lemire, A broadband ocean bottom seismometer system based on a 1
Hz natural period geophone, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 304-312, 2001.
Weeraratne, D.S., D.W. Forsyth, K.M. Fisher, and A.A. Nyblade, Rayleigh wave tomography evidence
for an upper mantle plume beneath the Tanzanian Craton, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 2004.
West et al., Magma storage beneath Axial volcano on the Juan de Fuca mid-ocean ridge, Nature, 25, 833837, 2001.
Wiens, D.A., et al, A deep earthquake aftershock sequence and implications for the rupture mechanism of
deep earthquakes, Nature, 372, 540-543, 1994.
Wiens, D.A., Seismological constraints on the mechanism of deep earthquakes: temperature dependence
of deep earthquake source properties, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 127, 145-163, 2001.
Wiens, D.A., and N.O. Snider, Repeating deep earthquakes: Evidence for fault reactivation at great depth,
Science, 293, 1463-1466, 2001.
Wiens, D.A., and G.P. Smith, Seismological Constraints on Structure and Flow Patterns Within the
Mantle Wedge, in Inside the Subduction Factory, AGU Monogr. 138, 59-81, 2003.
Wilson, D.S., Focused upwelling beneath mid-ocean ridges: Evidence from seamount formation and
isostatic compensation of topography, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 113, 41-55, 1992.
Wolfe, C.J. and P.G. Silver, Seismic anisotropy of the oceanic upper mantle: shear wave splitting
methodologies and observations, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 749-771, 1998.
Wolfe, C.J., et al., Microearthquake characteristics and crustal velocity structure at 29N on the MidAtlantic Ridge, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 24449-24472, 1993.
Xu, Y., and D.A. Wiens, Upper mantle structure of the southwest Pacific from regional waveform
inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 27439-27451, 1997.
0426408
Zellmer, K.E., and B. Taylor, A three-plate kinematic model for Lau Basin opening, Geochem. Geophys.
Geosystems, 2, 2000GC000106, 2001.
Zhang, S., and S.-I. Karato, Lattice preferred orientation of olivine aggregates deformed in simple shear,
Nature 375, 774-777, 1995.
Zhang, S., U.H. Faul, Y. Zhou, S.-I. Karato, and J.F. Gerald, Simple shear deformation of olivine
aggregates, Tectonophysics, 316, 133-152, 2000.
Zhao, D., Y. Xu, D.A. Wiens, L. Dorman, J. Hildebrand, and S. Webb, Depth extent of the Lau back-arc
spreading center and its relation to the subduction process, Science, 278, 254-257, 1997
Zhao, D., A. Hasegawa, and S. Horiuchi, Tomographic imaging of P and S wave velocity structure
beneath Northeastern Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19,909-19928, 1992.
0426408
VITA
DOUGLAS A. WIENS
ADDRESS:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Washington University
1 Brookings Drive
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
Email: [email protected], Phone: (314) 935-6517
PERSONAL:
Born May 1, 1958, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Married to Debra Wiens, two children
EDUCATION:
Wheaton College (Ill.), Physics, B.S., 1980
Northwestern University, Geological Sciences, M. S., 1982
Northwestern University, Geological Sciences, Ph. D., 1985
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Acting Chair, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University, 2004
Professor, Washington University, 1996-present
Associate Professor, Washington University, 1991-1996
Assistant Professor, Washington University, 1984-1991
Research Assistant, Northwestern University, 1980-1984
5 CLOSELY RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Zhao, D., Y. Xu, D. A. Wiens, L. Dorman, J. Hildebrand, S. Webb, Depth extent of the
Lau back-arc spreading center and its relationship to subduction processes, Science,
278, 254-257, 1997.
Koper, K., D. A. Wiens, L. M. Dorman, J. A. Hildebrand, and S. C. Webb, Constraints on
the origin of slab and mantle wedge anomalies in Tonga from the ratio of S to P
anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15089-15104, 1999.
Roth, E., D. A. Wiens, L. M. Dorman, J. Hildebrand, and S. C. Webb, Seismic
attenuation tomography of the Tonga back-arc region using phase pair methods, J
Geophys. Res., 104, 4795-4809, 1999.
Smith, G. P., D. A. Wiens, K. M. Fischer, L. M. Dorman, S. C. Webb, and J. A.
Hildebrand, A complex pattern of mantle flow in the Lau backarc, Science, 292,
713-716, 2001.
Wiens, D. A., and G. P. Smith, Seismological constraints on structure and flow patterns
within the mantle wedge, in Inside the subduction factory, AGU Monograph, 138,
59-81, 2003.
5 OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Wiens, D. A., J. J. McGuire, P. J. Shore, M. G. Bevis, K. Draunidalo, G. Prasad, S. P.
Helu, A deep earthquake aftershock sequence and implications for the rupture
mechanism of deep earthquakes, Nature, 372, 540-543, 1994.
Wiens, D. A., and H. J. Gilbert, Slab temperature effects on deep earthquake aftershock
productivity and magnitude-frequency relations, Nature, 384, 153-156, 1996.
0426408
Xu, Y., and D. A. Wiens, Upper mantle structure of the southwest Pacific from regional
waveform inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 27439-27451, 1997.
Wiens, D. A., and N. O. Snider, Repeating deep earthquakes: Evidence for fault
reactivation at great depth, Science, 293, 1463-1466, 2001.
Wiens, D. A., Seismological constraints on the mechanism of deep earthquakes:
temperature dependence of deep earthquake source properties, Phys. Earth Planet.
Int., 127, 145-163, 2001.
SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES:
Incorporated Research Institutions in Seismology (IRIS):
Executive committee, Global Seismic Network standing committee,
Nominations committee (chair), IRIS workshop program director
PASSCAL center selection committee, Data Management committee
Ocean Drilling Program (ODP)
Science steering and evaluation committee (ISSEP)
Science committee (SCICOM)
MARGINS program steering committee, 1997-2002
RIDGE2000 program steering committee, 2002-present
Ocean Bottom Seismograph Inst. Pool Oversight committee (chair), 2001-2003
COLLABORATORS AND FORMER ADVISORS:
S. Stein (thesis advisor), Northwestern University
S. Anandakrishnan, Penn State University
L. Dorman, Scripps Institute of Oceanography
G. Helffrich, University of Bristol (UK)
J. Hildebrand, Scripps Institute of Oceanography
S. Klemperer, Stanford University
A. Nyblade, Penn State University
B. Taylor, University of Hawaii
E. Vera, Universidad de Chile
S. Webb, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
ADVISING:
Postdoctoral: Dapeng Zhao, Gideon Smith, James Conder, Rigobert Tibi
Graduate Students: David Petroy (M.A., 1988), Aristeo Pelayo (Ph.D., 1990), AnNing Zhu (Ph.D., 1993), Megan Flanagan (Ph.D. 1994), Keith Koper (Ph.D.,
1998), Erich Roth (Ph.D., 1999), Stacey Robertson Maurice (2003), Jesse
Fisher Lawrence (current), Brian Shiro (current), Sara Pozgay (current), Moira
Pyle (current), Mitchell Barklage (current)
Undergraduate Research Advisees: Jeffrey McGuire, Hersh Gilbert, Tom Bawden,
Brian Park-Li, Mark Wuenscher, Nathan Snider, Phil Skemer, Rebecca Stiles,
John Russell (current)
TEACHING:
Introduction to Geophysics, Seismology, Advanced Seismology, Structural
Geology, Plate Tectonics, Geodynamics, Inverse Theory, Geophysical Data
Analysis, Earth Forces, Exploration and Environmental Geophysics, Quantitative
Methods in Environmental Sciences
0426408
James A. Conder
Washington University
Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Campus Box 1169. One Brookings Dr.
St. Louis, MO 63130
tel: (314) 935-7372 fax: (314) 935-7361
[email protected]
Appointments
MARGINS Postdoctoral Fellow, 2003 - 2004
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Washington University; St. Louis, MO, 2000 - present
Education
Ph.D., Brown University; Providence, RI, 2001
Sc.M., Geophysics, Brown University, 1998
B.S., Geology, minor Mathematics, University of Utah; Salt Lake City, Utah, 1994
Teaching/Work Experience
Teaching Assistant in Structural Geology, Brown University, 1997, 1998, 2000
Geological Data Technician, Kennecott Exploration, Inc.; Magna, Utah, 1994 - 1995
Collaborators
M. Eberle, D. Forsyth, W. Hammond, S.-H. Hung, J. Morris, E. M. Parmentier, D. Scheirer,
D. Toomey, D. Wiens, W. Wilcock
Advisors
D. Forsyth, Ph.D.
D. Wiens, Postdoctoral
Publications
Conder, J. A., D. W. Forsyth, and E. M. Parmentier, Asthenospheric flow and the asymmetry of
the East Pacific Rise, MELT area, JGR, 107, 2344, 10.1029/2001JB000807, 2002
Conder, J. A., D. A. Wiens, and J. Morris, On the decompression melting structure at volcanic
arcs and back-arc spreading centers, GRL, 29, 10.1029/2002GL015390, 2002
Toomey, D. R., W. S. D. Wilcock, J. A. Conder, D. W. Forsyth, J. Blundy, E. M. Parmentier, and
W. C. Hammond, Asymmetric mantle dynamics in the MELT region of the East Pacific Rise,
EPSL, 200, 287-295, 2002
Conder, J. A. and D. W. Forsyth, Seafloor spreading on the Southeast Indian Ridge over the last
one million years: A test of the Capricorn plate hypothesis, EPSL, 188, 91-105, 2001
Conder, J. A., D. S. Scheirer, and D. W. Forsyth, Seafloor spreading on the Amsterdam-St. Paul
hotspot plateau, JGR, 105, 8263-8277, 2000
Scheirer, D. S., D. W. Forsyth, J. A. Conder, M. A. Eberle, S.-H. Hung, K. T. M. Johnson, and D.
W. Graham, Anomalous seafloor spreading of the Southeast Indian Ridge near the
Amsterdam-St. Paul Plateau, JGR, 105, 8243-8262, 2000
Conder, J. A. and D. W. Forsyth, Do the 1998 Antarctic plate earthquake and its aftershocks
delineate a plate boundary?, GRL, 27, 2309-2313, 2000
Shen, Y., D. W. Forsyth, J. A. Conder, and L. M. Dorman, Investigation of microearthquake
activity following an intraplate teleseismic swarm on the west flank of the Southern East
Pacific Rise, JGR, 102, 459-475, 1997
0426408
Donna K. Blackman
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
La Jolla CA 92093-0225
(858)534-8813
[email protected]
Nationality: U.S.
Institution and Location
Major
Degree
Yr
Semester at Sea, University of Colorado, Boulder CO
Pasadena City College, Pasadena CA
University of California, Santa Cruz CA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA
Brown University, Providence, RI
Humanities
Geology
Earth Science
Marine Geophysics
Marine Geophysics
A.A.
B.S.
M. Sc.
PhD.
1977
1979
1982
1986
1991
Positions Held
7/03-present
7/99-6/03
9/96-present
8/95-6/99
8/95-7/96
5/92-6/95
1/92-4/92
3/91-9/91
10/86-12/86
8/80-8/83
11/78-6/79
Research Geophysicist, Scripps Institution Oceanography, La Jolla CA
Associate Research Geophysicist, Scripps Institution Oceanography, La Jolla CA
Lecturer, SIO/UCSD, grad/undergrad courses, Geophysics/Earth & Environ. Sciences
Assistant Research Geophysicist, Scripps Inst. of Oceanography
Lecturer, Dept Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Postgraduate Researcher, Scripps Inst. of Oceanography
Acting Assistant Professor, School of Oceanography, Univ. of WA, Seattle WA
RIDGE Office admin., & research postdoc, University of Washington
Visualization Programming, Deep Submergence Lab, WHOI, Woods Hole MA
Field/Lab Assistant, USGS, Pacific Marine Geology Branch, Menlo Park CA
Lab Assistant, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena CA
Five Directly Relevant Publications
Blackman, D.K., H-R. Wenk, J-M. Kendall, Seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle: 1. Factors
that affect mineral texture and effective elastic properties, G-Cubed 10.1029/2001GC000248,
2002.
Blackman, D.K. and J-M. Kendall, Seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle: 2. Predictions for
current plate boundary flow models, G-Cubed 10.1029/2001GC000247, 2002.
Hall, C.E., K.M. Fischer, E.M. Parmentier, D.K. Blackman, The influence of plate motions on
three dimensional back-arc mantle flow and shear wave splitting, J. Geophys. Res. 105,
28,009-28,034, 2000.
Blackman, D.K. and J-M. Kendall, Sensitivity of teleseismic body waves to mineral texture and
melt in the mantle beneath a mid-ocean ridge, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 355, 217-231,
1997.
Blackman, DK, J-M Kendall, PR Dawson, H-R Wenk, D Boyce, J Phipps Morgan, Teleseismic
imaging of subaxial flow at mid-ocean ridges: travel-time effects of anisotropic mineral texture
in the mantle, J. Geophys. Intl. 127, 415-426, 1996.
0430463
Five Other Recent Publications
Blackman, D.K., J.A. Karson, D.S. Kelley, J.R. Cann, G.L. Früh-Green, J.S. Gee, S.D. Hurst,
B.E. John, J.Morgan, S.L. Nooner, D.K. Ross, T.J. Schroeder, E.A. Williams, Geology of the
Atlantis Massif (MAR 30°N): implications for the evolution of an ultramaifc oceanic core
complex, Mar. Geophys. Res, in press 2003.
Schulte-Pelkum, V. and D.K. Blackman, A synthesis of seismic P and S anisotropy, Geophys. J.
Intl. 54, 166-178, 2003
Nooner, S.L., Sasagawa, G.S., Blackman, D.K., Zumberge, M.A, Constraints on Crustal
Structure at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge from Seafloor Gravity Measurements Made at the Atlantis
Massif, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1446, doi:10.1029/2003GL017126, 2003..
Klingelhöfer, F. , T.A. Minshull, D.K. Blackman, P. Harben, V. Childers, Crustal structure of
Ascension Island from wide-angle seismic data: implications for the formation of near-ridge
volcanic islands, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 190, 41-56, 2001.
Kelley, D.S., J.A. Karson, D.K. Blackman, G.L. Fruh-Green, D.A. Butterfield, M.D. Liley, E.J.
Olson, M.O. Schrenk, K.K. Roe, G.T. Lebon, P. Rivizzigno and AT3-60 Shipboard Party, An
off-axis hydrothermal vent field discovered near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 30°N, Nature 412,
145-149, 2001.
Synergistic Activities
Public Lectures-Marine Technology Society, Birch Aquarium, UCSD TV & Extension 00-02
Educational/Journal style website http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/mar for research cruise, 2000.
Brief interviews BBC Radio, Fox News, Discover Channel- discovery of Lost City Vents, 2000
Instructor in newly developing Environmental Systems program at UCSD 2001-present
Current member of RIDGE2000 Steering Committee and IODP/SSEP
Graduate Advisor
Donald Forsyth, Brown University
PostDoctoral Advisors John Orcutt, Jason Phipps Morgan, Scripps Inst. Oceanography
Collaboration in the past 4 years with:
Joe Cann, University of Leeds, UK
James Conder, Washington U
John Collins, WHOI
Rob Dunn, U Hawaii
Javier Escartin, IPGP, Paris
Gretchen Früh-Green, ETH, Zurich
Boulder
Phil Harben, LLNL
Barbara John, U Wyoming
Kevin Johnson, U Hawaii
Debbie Kelley, UW
Jeff Karson, Duke
Mike Kendall, Leeds, UK
Chris MacLeod, Cardiff, UK
Monique Seyler, IPGP Paris
Vera Schulte-Pelkum, U CO,
Doug Toomey, U Oregon
Spahr Webb, LDEO
Rudy Wenk, UC Berkeley
Doug Wiens, Washington U
0430463
ROBERT ALLEN DUNN
Department of Geology and Geophysics
University of Hawaii - Manoa
Honolulu, HI 96822
phone (808) 956 - 3728; fax (808) 956-5154
[email protected]
http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/GG/FACULTY/RDUNN
Professional Preparation
1992
1999
1999-2001
B.S.
Ph.D.
Post Doc
University of Minnesota, Aerospace Engineering
University of Oregon, Geophysics
Brown University
Appointments
Assistant Researcher, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii
Research Associate, Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University
Research Assistant, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon
Teaching Assistant, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon
Assistant Engineer, Limnological Research Center, University of Minnesota
Assistant Engineer, Honeywell, Minneapolis, MN
2002-present
1999-2001
1994-98
1993-94
1990-92
1988-90
Five Relevant Publications
Dunn, R. A., and D. W. Forsyth, Imaging the transition between the region of mantle melting and the
crustal magma chamber beneath the southern East Pacific Rise with short-period Love waves, J.
Geophys. Res., 108(B7), 2352, doi:10.1029/2002JB002217, 2003.
Dunn, R. A., and D. R. Toomey, Crack-induced seismic anisotropy in the oceanic crust
across the East Pacific Rise (9°30'N), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 189, 9-17, 2001.
Dunn, R. A., D. R. Toomey, R. S. Detrick, and W. S. D. Wilcock, Continuous mantle melt supply
beneath an overlapping spreading center on the East Pacific Rise, Science, 291, 1955-1958, 2001.
Dunn, R. A., D. R. Toomey, and S. C. Solomon, Three-dimensional seismic structure and physical
properties of the crust and shallow mantle beneath the East Pacific Rise at 9°30'N, J. Geophys. Res.,
105, 23,537-23,555, 2000.
Dunn, R. A. and D. R. Toomey, Seismological evidence for three-dimensional melt migration beneath
the East Pacific Rise, Nature, 388, 259-262, 1997.
Five Other Publications
Cherkaoui, A. S. M., W. S. D. Wilcock, R. A. Dunn, and D. R. Toomey, A numerical model of
hydrothermal cooling and crustal accretion at a fast spreading mid-ocean ridge, Geochem. Geophys.
Geosyst., 4(9), 8616, doi:10.1029/2001GC000215, 2003.
Jousselin, D., R. A. Dunn, D.R. Toomey, Modeling the seismic signature of structural data from the
Oman Ophiolite: Can a mantle diapir be detected beneath the East Pacific Rise?, Geochem. Geophys.
Geosyst., 4(7), 8610, doi:10.1029/2002GC000418, 2003.
Dunn, R. A., D. S. Scheirer, and D. W. Forsyth, A detailed comparison of repeated bathymetric surveys
0426428
along a 300-km-long section of the southern East Pacific Rise, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 463-472, 2001.
Dunn, R. A., Three-dimensional seismic structure and physical properties of the crust and shallow
mantle beneath the East Pacific Rise at 9°30'N, Doctoral Thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, 1999.
Cuny, J., R. A. Dunn, S. T. Hackstadt, C. W. Harrop, H. H. Hersey, A. D. Malony, and D. R. Toomey,
Building domain-specific environments for computational science: a case study in seismic tomography,
Inter. J. Supercomputer Applications and High Performance Computing, 11, 179-196, 1997.
Professional Services and Synergistic Activities
Member, RIDGE 2000 Community Workshop, Boulder, CO
2003
Member, Ocean Mantle Dynamics Workshop, Snowbird, UT
2002
Member, RIDGE 2000 IS Implementation Plan Workshop, Albuquerque, NM
2002
Member, RIDGE 2000 IS Community Education Workshop, Long Beach, CA
2002
Member, MARGINS Planning Workshop on Red Sea Rifting, Egypt
2001
Member, MARGINS Planning Workshop on the Gulf of California, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
2000
Member, RIDGE 2000 Exploratory Studies Planning Workshop, Nashville, TN
2000
Member, RIDGE 2000 Planning Workshop, DeKalb, IL
2000
Member, Plume-Ridge Interaction Workshop, Troutdale, OR
2000
Member, East Pacific Rise 9°N Workshop, Santa Barbara, CA
1998
Member, Winter School on Mid-Ocean Ridge Processes, Sultanate of Oman
1998
Member, Summer School on Mid-Ocean Ridge Processes, Iceland
1997
A major focus of research is the development of geophysical tools and techniques. These include
active-source tomographic methods for three-dimensional anisotropic structure and short period surface
waves for imaging the uppermost portion of the mantle.
Professional Society Memberships
Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society
American Geophysical Union
Geological Society of America
Seismological Society of America
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Doctoral Advisor: Douglas R. Toomey
Postdoctoral Advisor: Donald Forsyth
Collaborators within last 48 months
Collaborators: Jim Gaherty (Lamont/GeorgiaTech), Don Forsyth (Brown), Dan Scheirer
(USGS), Doug Toomey (UOregon), Will Wilcock (UWashington), Bob Detrick (WHOI),
Abdella Cherkaoui (UCSC), David Jousselin (CRPG-France), Sean Solomon (DTM-Carnegie),
Doug Weins (WashU), Donna Blackman (Scripps), James Conder (WashU), Spahr Webb
(Lamont).
Graduate Students Advised
Andrew Delorey, Tomoko Kurokawa, Ayesha Genz
0426428
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
SPAHR C. WEBB
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory,
Columbia University, Palisades, N.Y. 10964
Tel: 845-365-8439, Fax: 845-365-8150
email: [email protected]
Professional Preparation:
B.S. 1978, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Physics, and Earth and Planetary Science
Ph.D. 1984, University of California, San Diego, Oceanography
Professional Appointments:
2000-Present
Senior Research Scientist, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory,
Columbia University, Palisades, N.Y.
2000-Present
Adjunct Professor, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Columbia University
1997-Present
Research Oceanographer, Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
1993-1997
Associate Research Oceanographer, Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
1986-1993
Assistant Research Oceanographer, Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
1984-1986
Postdoctoral Scholar, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution,
Woods Hole, MA.
Related Publications:
Crawford, W.C., J.A. Hildebrand, Dorman, L.M., S.C. Webb, and D.A. Wiens, Tonga Ridge and Lau Basin crustal
structure from seismic refraction data, J. Geophys. Res., 108, (B4), 10.1029/2001JB001435, (2003).
Smith, G.P., D.A. Wiens, K.M. Fischer, L.M. Dorman, S.C. Webb, and J.A. Hildebrand, A complex pattern of
mantle flow in the Lau backarc, Science, 292, 713-716, (2001).
Zhao, D.P., Y. Xu, D.A. Wiens, L.M. Dorman, J.A. Hildebrand, and S.C. Webb, "Depth extent of the Lau back-arc
spreading center and its relation to subduction processes", Science, 278, 254-257, (1997).
Koper, K.D., D.A. Wiens, L.M. Dorman, J.A. Hildebrand, S.C. Webb, Modeling the Tonga Slab: can travel time
resolve a metastable olivine wedge?, J. Geophys. Res., 103(B12), 30079-30100, (1998).
Gilbert, H.J., A.F. Sheenan, D.A. Wiens, L. Dorman, J. Hildebrand, and S.C. Webb, Upper mantle discontinuity
structure in the region of the Tonga subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(9), 1855-1858, (2001).
Other Significant Publications:
Webb, S.C. “Broadband seismology and noise under the ocean”, Rev. of Geophysics, 36, 105-142., (1998).
Forsyth, D.W. and S.C. Webb, L.M. Dorman, and Y. Shen, "Phase velocities of Rayleigh waves in the MELT
experiment on the East Pacific Rise", Science, 280, 1235-1238, (1998).
Webb, S.C., and D.W. Forsyth, "Structure of the upper mantle under the EPR from waveform inversion of regional
events", Science, 280, 1227-1229, (1998).
Roth, E.G., D.A. Wiens, L.M. Dorman, S.C. Webb, and J. Hildebrand, Seismic attenuation tomography of the
Tonga-Fiji region using phase pair arrivals, J. Geophys. Res., 104(B4), 4795-4810, (1999).
E-1
0426369
Koper, K.D., D.A. Wiens, L.M. Dorman, J.A. Hildebrand, S.C. Webb, Constraints on the origin of slab and mantle
wedge anomalies in Tonga from the ratio of S to P velocities, J. Geophys. Res., 104(B7), 15089-15104, (1999).
Synergistic Activites: The development of broad band seismometer systems (OBSs) by my lab has made it possible
to conduct research into the structure of the upper mantle beneath the oceans. I operate a fleet of 60 OBSs as part of
the NSF OBS Pool that are available to any NSF supported researcher.
Research Activities:
Broad band marine seismology.
Structure of the oceanic crust and mantle.
Seismicity of ridge crests and ridge crest hydrothermal systems.
Seafloor electromagnetic fluctuations and active source electromagnetic sounding of rock conductivity.
Propagation and sources of microseisms and infragravity waves.
Marine instrumentation for geophysical and oceanographic applications.
Professional Societies:
American Geophysical Union, Seismological Society of America.
Research Cruises:
Sixtyone research cruises or engineering tests since 1986, Cruises (Webb group) in 2001
May, (ship: Endeavor), Narragansett, testing of AUVOBS (APOGEE) prototype, w/ Sohn.
July, (ship, Weatherbird), Bermuda, testing of AUVOBS (APOGEE) prototype, w/ Sohn.
November- December, (ship: Melville), Papeete-Easter, deploy 28 OBS, seismic refraction, gravity, seabeam,
dredging, gross grain ridge expedition (w/Forsyth).
Graduate Students Supervised:
Mark A. Mc Donald, Ph.D 1994, Wayne C. Crawford, Ph.D 1994 (IPGP), Robert A. Sohn, Ph.D 1996 (WHOI),
Robert Prescott, Charles Golden PhD. 2000, R. Chadwick Holmes
Postdoctoral Associates: Vallerie Ballu (IPGP), Jeff Gu
Recent Scientific Collaborators: Ph.D Supervisor: Charles S. Cox (SIO)
Andrew Barclay (UW), Wayne Crawford (IPGP), John Diebold (LDEO), R. Nigel Edwards (U Toronto) , Robert
Evans (WHOI) , Leroy Dorman (SIO), Don Forsyth (Brown), Dan Frye (WHOI), Jeff Gee (SIO), John Hildebrand
(SIO), Keith Koper (SLU), Hersch Gilbert, Charles Langmuir (Harvard), ), Vadim Levin (Rutgers), William Menke
(LDEO), Anee Sheenan (ColoU), Dan Shierer (USGS), Gideon Smith (UWash), Robert Sohn (WHOI), Hubert
Staudigel (SIO), Uri Ten Brink (USGS), Douglas Wiens (Washington U.), W.S. Wilcock (UW), Mike West (ASU),
Frank Vernon (SIO), Maya Tolstoy (LDEO), Mark Zumberge (SIO)
E-2
0426369
SUMMARY
YEAR 1
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Washington University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Douglas A Wiens
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Douglas A Wiens - PI
0.00 0.00
2. James A Conder - CO-I
3.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 1 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
2.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
1.00 $
0.00
11,679 $
10,416
0.00
1.00
0
22,095
0.00
0.00
0
13,532
23,958
0
0
0
59,585
9,472
69,057
0
0
14,000
0
5,000
0
0
0
0
6,500
11,500
94,557
Off Campus Provisional 7/1/04 (Rate: 26.0000, Base: 33464) (Cont. on Comments Page)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
41,080
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
135,637
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
135,637 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Douglas A Wiens
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Cynthia white
1 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426408
SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET COMMENTS - Year 1
** I- Indirect Costs
On Campus Prov 7/1/04 (Rate: 53.0000, Base 61093)
0426408
SUMMARY
YEAR 2
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Washington University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Douglas A Wiens
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Douglas A Wiens - PI
0.00 0.00
2. James A Conder - CO-I
3.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 1 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
2.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
1.00 $
0.00
12,263 $
10,937
0.00
1.00
0
23,200
0.00
0.00
0
14,208
25,155
0
0
0
62,563
10,253
72,816
0
2,800
5,600
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
6,000
8,000
89,216
Off Campus Provisional 7/1/04 (Rate: 26.0000, Base: 16185) (Cont. on Comments Page)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
42,914
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
132,130
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
132,130 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Douglas A Wiens
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Cynthia white
2 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426408
SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET COMMENTS - Year 2
** I- Indirect Costs
On Campus Prov 7/1/04 (Rate: 53.0000, Base 73031)
0426408
SUMMARY
YEAR 3
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Washington University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Douglas A Wiens
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Douglas A Wiens - PI
0.00 0.00
2. James A Conder - CO-I
3.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 1 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.50 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
1.00 $
0.00
12,876 $
11,400
0.00
1.00
0
24,276
0.00
0.00
0
3,752
26,413
0
0
0
54,441
8,213
62,654
0
4,800
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
2,500
4,500
71,954
PROV 7/04 (Rate: 53.0000, Base: 71954)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
38,136
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
110,090
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
110,090 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Douglas A Wiens
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Cynthia white
3 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426408
SUMMARY
YEAR 4
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Washington University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Douglas A Wiens
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Douglas A Wiens - PI
0.00 0.00
2. James A Conder - CO-I
3.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 1 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.50 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
1.00 $
0.00
13,520 $
11,970
0.00
1.00
0
25,490
0.00
0.00
0
3,940
27,734
0
0
0
57,164
8,624
65,788
0
2,800
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
2,500
4,500
73,088
PROV 7/04 (Rate: 53.0000, Base: 73088)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
38,737
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
111,825
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
111,825 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Douglas A Wiens
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Cynthia white
4 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426408
SUMMARY
Cumulative
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL BUDGET
ORGANIZATION
PROPOSAL NO.
Washington University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
Douglas A Wiens
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Douglas A Wiens - PI
0.00 0.00
2. James A Conder - CO-I
12.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. (
) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
12.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 4 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
5.00 0.00
3. ( 4 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
4.00 $
0.00
50,338 $
44,723
0.00
4.00
0
95,061
0.00
0.00
0
35,432
103,260
0
0
0
233,753
36,562
270,315
0
10,400
19,600
0
7,000
4,000
0
0
0
17,500
28,500
328,815
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
160,867
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
489,682
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
489,682 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Douglas A Wiens
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Cynthia white
C *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426408
Budget Summary – Washington University
Collaborative Research: Crustal Accretion and Mantle Processes Along
the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau Spreading Center
January 2006 – December 2009
Year 1
On-Campus Off-Campus
Salary
Doug Wiens
James Conder
Patrick Shore
Graduate RA
Fringe Benef.
$6,885
$13,532
$21,913
$5,863
Foreign Travel:
Land Station Instal
$5,600
OBS Deployment
Land Station Service
$2,800
OBS Recovery/Deinstall.
$11,679
$3,531
$2,045
$3,609
Other Expenses:
Computer Maintenance
Communications
Truck Rental
Shipment/Seismographs
$12,263
$7,230
$14,208
$23,008
$9,022
$3,707
$2,147
$1,231
$5,600
$5,600
Domestic Travel:
AGU Meeting/2 People
San Diego/2 People
Collaboration
Materials/Supplies:
Field sup./Parts Ship.
DAT/DLT Tapes
Vault Const/Batteries
Year 2
On-Campus Off-Campus
$2,800
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$3,000
$2,000
$500
$2,000
$500
$1,000
$3,000
$500
$3,000
Publications
Subtotal
Overhead
Total
$61,093
$32,379
$93,472
$33,464
$8,701
$42,165
$73,031
$38,706
$111,737
$16,185
$4,208
$20,393
0426408
Budget Summary - Washington University
Year 3
Salary
Doug Wiens
James Conder
Patrick Shore
Graduate RA
Fringe Benef.
$12,876
$11,400
$3,752
$26,413
$8,213
Page 2
Year 4
On-Campus
$13,520
$11,970
$3,940
$27,734
$8,624
Foreign Travel:
Installation
OBS Deployment/Service
Service Trip
OBS Recovery/Deinstall.
Domestic Travel:
AGU Meeting/2 People
San Diego/2 People
Collaboration
Publications
Subtotal
Overhead
Total
$50,338
$44,723
$35,432
$103,260
$36,562
$5,600
$5,600
$2,800
$5,600
$2,800
$2,000
$2,800
Materials/Supplies:
Field sup./Parts Ship.
DAT/DLT Tapes
Vault Const/Batteries
Other Expenses:
Computer Maintenance
Communications
Truck Rental
Shipment/Seismographs
4 Year Total
$8,400
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
$3,000
$2,000
$500
$2,000
$500
$8,000
$2,000
$1,500
$6,000
$2,000
$2,000
$4,000
$71,954
$38,136
$110,090
$73,088
$38,737
$111,825
$328,815
$160,867
$489,682
0426408
Budget Justification – Washington University
Douglas Wiens (PI) will be in charge of coordinating the land station deployment
and directing the seismological research at Washington University. He will go to sea for the
OBS deployment and recovery cruises. 1 month summer salary per year is budgeted for
him. James Conder (co-PI) will be in charge of the mantle flow modeling work and will
also participate in seismological data analysis. Three months salary per year is budgeted for
him. Staff Scientist Patrick Shore has extensive experience as the fieldwork coordinator for
six major PASSCAL projects. He will be in charge of designing and constructing the
instrument enclosures, carrying out the deployments, and dealing with equipment issues.
He will participate the land station deployment trip and the land station service trip. He is
also responsible for maintaining the Washington University seismology computer system.
Two months/year of salary is budgeted for him during the first two years of the project, and
one-half month per year thereafter. We have budgeted a Washington University graduate
student for each year of the project. The student will take part in the OBS deployment
cruise, some of the land station trips, and will conduct research on the data.
Funds are budgeted for an initial land station deployment trip for two individuals, and
one servicing trip, Funds are also budgeted for two people to travel to the OBS deployment
cruise and two people for the OBS recovery cruise. The land stations will be removed
during the OBS recover cruise. Longer field trips are charged at a lower off-campus
overhead rate (26%) in accord with university policies. For each trip we budget $2200 for
air fare and $60 per day per person for food and lodging. Instruments for the land
deployment will be obtained from the IRIS-PASSCAL program. Shipping costs for the
instruments are estimated at $500 per seismograph each way. $1500 are requested for truck
rental to carry out the land station deployment and deinstallation. Funds are requested for
two people to attend AGU meetings during each of the last three years of the proposal, and
funds are requested for two people to attend a science coordination meeting of the PIs in
San Diego during the third budget year.
Construction and setup costs are estimated at $500 for each of the 6 land seismographs;
this includes about $125 each for two batteries, and $250 per station for vault construction
materials, labor, and small payments to landowners. A total of $2000 is requested for data
tapes (DAT and DLT) for data storage and archiving. Land station data will be quality
checked, organized, stored, and analyzed at Washington University, and sent to the IRISDMC. $2000 per year is requested for partial maintenance of the seismology computing
facilities at Washington University. $2000 per year is requested for page charges and color
fees during the last two years of the project.
0426408
SUMMARY
YEAR 1
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Donna K Blackman
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Donna K Blackman - Res Geophysicist
1.50 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
1.50 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 0 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
13,354 $
0.00
0.00
0
13,354
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
13,354
0
13,354
0
0
1,892
0
0
0
0
603
0
0
603
15,849
MTDC (Rate: 52.0000, Base: 15849)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
8,241
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
24,090
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
24,090 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Donna K Blackman
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Marian crosser
1 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0430463
SUMMARY
YEAR 2
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Donna K Blackman
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Donna K Blackman - Res Geophysicist
2.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
2.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
G5 Macintosh, monitor & 4 GB RAM
$
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
18,696 $
0.00
0.00
0
18,696
0.00
0.00
0
0
1,719
0
0
0
20,415
1,441
21,856
5,018
5,018
0
1,892
0
0
0
0
804
0
0
804
29,570
MTDC (Rate: 52.0000, Base: 21392)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
11,124
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
40,694
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
40,694 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Donna K Blackman
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Marian crosser
2 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0430463
SUMMARY
YEAR 3
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Donna K Blackman
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Donna K Blackman - Res Geophysicist
1.50 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
1.50 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 0 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
14,723 $
0.00
0.00
0
14,723
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
14,723
0
14,723
0
4,100
0
0
0
1,500
0
603
0
0
2,103
20,926
MTDC (Rate: 52.0000, Base: 20926)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
10,882
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
31,808
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
31,808 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Donna K Blackman
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Marian crosser
3 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0430463
SUMMARY
YEAR 4
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Donna K Blackman
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Donna K Blackman - Res Geophysicist
1.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
1.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 0 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
10,306 $
0.00
0.00
0
10,306
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,306
0
10,306
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
402
0
0
402
12,108
MTDC (Rate: 52.0000, Base: 12108)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
6,296
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
18,404
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
18,404 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Donna K Blackman
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Marian crosser
4 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0430463
SUMMARY
Cumulative
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL BUDGET
ORGANIZATION
PROPOSAL NO.
University of California-San Diego Scripps Inst of Oceanography
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
Donna K Blackman
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Donna K Blackman - Res Geophysicist
6.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. (
) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
6.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
$
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
57,079 $
0.00
0.00
0
57,079
0.00
0.00
0
0
1,719
0
0
0
58,798
1,441
60,239
5,018
5,018
5,500
3,784
0
0
1,500
0
2,412
0
0
3,912
78,453
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
36,543
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
114,996
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
114,996 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Donna K Blackman
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Marian crosser
C *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0430463
Budget Justification.
Blackman and an SIO graduate student will each participate in one of the OBS cruises.
Blackman will work onshore in each of years 2 & 3 to integrate initial anisotropy results
and model it's development in the study area. In the final year, a short period will be
devoted to writeup of publication that Blackman expects to lead and to formulating a
proposal for in-depth followup modeling, based on initial results. Salary support is
requested to cover these periods.
IGPP plans to upgrade its computer network and the expectation is that only a single type
of machine will be supported. The equipment request follows one model for the network
upgrade and the steps that Blackman would need to make to fit into the plan in a way that
allows computationally intensive research, such as this project will require.
Travel to and from the ship will be supported by requested funds. The anisotropy
modeling will be done in close collaboration with the corresponding data analysis that
will largely be carried out at LDEO by Webb, Menke and their graduate student. Travel
support is requested in the 2nd year, in combination with a Spring AGU meeting at which
preliminary results will be presented, for a few-day trip to discuss results at their lab.
Integration of flow and anisotropy modeling will be coordinated with James Conder at
Washington University. Much of this will be done electronically, however a workshop at
SIO in the 3rd year will serve not only to provide discussion with the full group of
collaborators, but also to allow detailed interaction with Conder on this aspect. The
remaining request for funds will go toward support of normal communication and
computing costs for this project.
0430463
SUMMARY
YEAR 1
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of Hawaii
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Robert A Dunn
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Robert A Dunn - Asst. Researcher
3.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 1 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
20,111 $
0.00
0.00
0
20,111
0.00
0.00
0
0
25,367
4,000
0
0
49,478
9,061
58,539
0
0
4,626
0
1,500
250
0
2,000
0
3,500
7,250
70,415
TDC-Less SOEST network Fee (Rate: 36.3000, Base: 68415)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
24,835
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
95,250
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
95,250 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Robert A Dunn
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Linda lau
1 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426428
SUMMARY
YEAR 2
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of Hawaii
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Robert A Dunn
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Robert A Dunn - Asst. Researcher
3.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 1 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
20,915 $
0.00
0.00
0
20,915
0.00
0.00
0
0
26,381
0
0
0
47,296
9,340
56,636
0
4,100
3,084
0
1,000
2,500
0
2,100
0
2,100
7,700
71,520
TDC-Less SOEST network Fee (Rate: 36.3000, Base: 69420)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
25,199
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
96,719
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
96,719 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Robert A Dunn
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Linda lau
2 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426428
SUMMARY
YEAR 3
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of Hawaii
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Robert A Dunn
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Robert A Dunn - Asst. Researcher
3.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
21,752 $
0.00
0.00
0
21,752
0.00
0.00
0
0
27,437
0
0
0
49,189
9,713
58,902
0
7,650
0
0
500
3,000
0
2,200
0
2,200
7,900
74,452
TDC-Less SOEST network Fee (Rate: 36.3000, Base: 72252)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
26,227
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
100,679
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
100,679 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Robert A Dunn
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Linda lau
3 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426428
SUMMARY
YEAR 4
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
University of Hawaii
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Robert A Dunn
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Robert A Dunn - Asst. Researcher
3.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
3.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
22,622 $
0.00
0.00
0
22,622
0.00
0.00
0
0
28,534
0
0
0
51,156
10,102
61,258
0
4,350
0
0
500
3,500
0
2,300
0
2,300
8,600
74,208
TDC-Less SOEST network Fee (Rate: 36.3000, Base: 71908)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
26,103
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
100,311
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
100,311 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Robert A Dunn
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Linda lau
4 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426428
SUMMARY
Cumulative
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL BUDGET
ORGANIZATION
PROPOSAL NO.
University of Hawaii
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
Robert A Dunn
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Robert A Dunn - Asst. Researcher
12.00 0.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. (
) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
12.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 4 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 2 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 0 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 0 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
85,400 $
0.00
0.00
0
85,400
0.00
0.00
0
0
107,719
4,000
0
0
197,119
38,216
235,335
0
16,100
7,710
0
3,500
9,250
0
8,600
0
10,100
31,450
290,595
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
102,364
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
392,959
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
392,959 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Robert A Dunn
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Linda lau
C *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426428
SOEST Budget for Lau Project (Jan 1, 2006 - Dec 31, 2009)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
A. Senior Personnel
1. R. Dunn - Asst. Researcher (3/3/3/3 mo.)
Year 4
20111
20915
21752
22622
B. Other Personnel
5. Graduate Students (1x12mo @50%/year)
(3 mo ea. summer overload @ 50%)
6. 1 Undergraduate Watch Stander (400 hrs @$10/hr)
19680
5687
4000
20467
5914
0
21286
6151
0
22137
6397
0
C. Fringe Benefits
PI @ 35% Regular year
Student @ 9% Regular year
Student @ 3% Summer overload
Undergrad @ 2%
Total Salaries and Fringe
7039
1771
171
80
58539
7320
1842
177
0
56636
7613
1916
185
0
58902
7918
1992
192
0
61258
0
4100
7650
4350
4626
3084
0
0
1500
250
0
2000
0
1000
2500
0
2100
0
500
3000
0
2200
0
500
3500
0
2300
0
6. Others: a.Communications and Shipping
b. Software/Hardware maintenance
2000
1500
500
1600
500
1700
500
1800
Total Other Direct Costs:
7250
7700
7900
8600
H. Total Direct Costs
70415
71520
74452
74208
I. Indirect Costs
36.3% TDC less equipment and SOEST network fee
24835
25199
26228
26103
J. Total Costs
95249
96719
100680
100311
E. Travel
Domestic: 2 trips to SF AGU + 5 days per diem
@$190/day+fees (years 2-4) plus 1 trip each for PI and student
to La Jolla in third year + 5 days perdiem@$150/day for
collaboration with PIS at other institutions
International: (3 Trips 1st year and 2 in 2nd year) HonoluluNuku'alofa, Tonga + 4days perdiem @$98/day
G. Other Direct Costs
1. Materials and Supplies:
2. Publication and Duplication Costs
3. Consultant Services
4. Computer Services - SOEST Network Fee
5. Subcontracts
0426428
SUMMARY
YEAR 1
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Columbia University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Spahr C Webb
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Spahr C Webb - Sr. Research Scientist
1.00 0.00
2. William H Menke - Professor
0.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
1.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 1 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 1 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
0.25
10,225 $
3,184
0.00
0.25
0
13,409
0.00
0.00
0
0
26,268
0
1,712
4,500
45,889
4,037
49,926
0
0
7,935
0
1,000
0
0
1,773
0
16,182
18,955
76,816
MTDC (Rate: 53.0000, Base: 59111)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
31,329
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
108,145
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
108,145 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Spahr C Webb
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Beth israel
1 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426369
SUMMARY
YEAR 2
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Columbia University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Spahr C Webb
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Spahr C Webb - Sr. Research Scientist
1.00 0.00
2. William H Menke - Professor
0.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
1.00 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 1 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 1 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
0.25
10,736 $
3,343
0.00
0.25
0
14,079
0.00
0.00
0
0
27,928
0
1,798
1,050
44,855
4,271
49,126
0
0
5,102
0
1,000
0
0
1,664
0
16,660
19,324
73,552
MTDC (Rate: 53.0000, Base: 55478)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
29,403
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
102,955
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
102,955 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Spahr C Webb
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Beth israel
2 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426369
SUMMARY
YEAR 3
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Columbia University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Spahr C Webb
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Spahr C Webb - Sr. Research Scientist
0.25 0.00
2. William H Menke - Professor
0.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
0.25 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 1 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 1 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
0.25
2,818 $
3,510
0.00
0.25
0
6,328
0.00
0.00
0
0
29,700
0
1,888
0
37,916
2,226
40,142
0
5,681
0
0
1,000
0
0
1,412
0
17,152
19,564
65,387
MTDC (Rate: 53.0000, Base: 47073)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
24,949
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
90,336
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
90,336 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Spahr C Webb
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Beth israel
3 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426369
SUMMARY
YEAR 4
PROPOSAL BUDGET
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL NO.
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
ORGANIZATION
Columbia University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
Spahr C Webb
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Spahr C Webb - Sr. Research Scientist
0.25 0.00
2. William H Menke - Professor
0.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. ( 0 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
0.25 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 1 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 1 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
0.25
2,959 $
3,686
0.00
0.25
0
6,645
0.00
0.00
0
0
31,576
0
1,982
0
40,203
2,355
42,558
0
3,614
0
0
1,000
2,000
0
1,483
0
17,659
22,142
68,314
MTDC (Rate: 53.0000, Base: 49422)
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
26,194
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
94,508
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
94,508 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Spahr C Webb
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Beth israel
4 *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426369
SUMMARY
Cumulative
FOR NSF USE ONLY
PROPOSAL BUDGET
ORGANIZATION
PROPOSAL NO.
Columbia University
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR / PROJECT DIRECTOR
DURATION (months)
Proposed Granted
AWARD NO.
Spahr C Webb
A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PI’s, Faculty and Other Senior Associates
(List each separately with title, A.7. show number in brackets)
NSF Funded
Person-months
CAL
ACAD
1. Spahr C Webb - Sr. Research Scientist
2.50 0.00
2. William H Menke - Professor
0.00 0.00
3.
4.
5.
6. (
) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PAGE)
0.00 0.00
7. ( 2 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1 - 6)
2.50 0.00
B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS)
1. ( 0 ) POST DOCTORAL ASSOCIATES
0.00 0.00
2. ( 0 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.)
0.00 0.00
3. ( 4 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS
4. ( 0 ) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
5. ( 4 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY)
6. ( 4 ) OTHER
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B)
C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS)
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C)
D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
E. TRAVEL
1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS)
2. FOREIGN
F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS
0
1. STIPENDS
$
0
2. TRAVEL
0
3. SUBSISTENCE
0
4. OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
(
0)
G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
2. PUBLICATION COSTS/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION
3. CONSULTANT SERVICES
4. COMPUTER SERVICES
5. SUBAWARDS
6. OTHER
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G)
I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)(SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)
TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
SUMR
Funds
Requested By
proposer
Funds
granted by NSF
(if different)
0.00 $
1.00
26,738 $
13,723
0.00
1.00
0
40,461
0.00
0.00
0
0
115,472
0
7,380
5,550
168,863
12,889
181,752
0
9,295
13,037
0
4,000
2,000
0
6,332
0
67,653
79,985
284,069
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A)
111,875
J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I)
395,944
K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECTS SEE GPG II.C.6.j.)
0
L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K)
$
395,944 $
M. COST SHARING PROPOSED LEVEL $
AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT $
0
PI/PD NAME
FOR NSF USE ONLY
INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATION
Spahr C Webb
Date Checked
Date Of Rate Sheet
Initials - ORG
ORG. REP. NAME*
Beth israel
C *ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR REVISED BUDGET
0426369
BUDGET JUSTIFICATION
Salaries: Webb will help direct and plan the cruises for the experiment. Menke and
Webb will jointly supervise a graduate student who will work on major components of
the passive seismic experiment. One emphasis at LDEO will be the analysis of the local
earthquakes. We will also collaborate with Wash U. on the body wave tomography
focusing on the analysis of anisotropy. Webb has requested salary support at a level of 1,
1, 0.25 and 0.25 months during the four years of the budget. Menke requests only 0.25
mo. of summer salary support in each of the four years. Sea Pay is requested for Webb,
Menke and the graduate student in year 1 and for Webb and the graduate student in year
2. The LDEO budget goes primarily to support four years of a graduate student (TBD)
and for the travel required by the project. Administrative assistance is requested (1/2
month each year) to help with travel arrangements and publications.
Foreign Travel: Funds are requested so that Webb, Menke and the graduate student can
participate in the OBS deployment/active source leg, and Webb and the graduate student
can participate in the recovery leg.
Domestic Travel: The proposal group plans to meet during the 3rd year in San Diego to
discuss experiment results. We request funding for the three people to travel from LDEO
to San Diego for this meeting. We also request funds so that two people can attend the
Fall AGU meeting in years 3 and 4 to disseminate results.
Materials and Supplies: Modest funds are requested for office supplies and for backup
tapes and other project related parts and supplies.
Publications: Request for $2000 in year 4 are nominal assessments for page charges for
the publications that are likely to emerge from the proposed research.
Computer Services Assessment: The 3% Computer Services Assessment funds the suite
of basic computer services required to support the successful execution of the research
program described in this proposal. The assessment consists of a Network Access charge
to support the LDEO Computer Network physical facilities including the wires, fibers,
routers, etc., and a Basic Computer Services charge that supports additional services such
as help desk, installation and configuration, connection to the LDEO Network, security,
backups, email, etc. A representative Computer Oversight Committee sets overall levels
for the services included in both cost categories, and recommends yearly rates to the
Executive Committee of the Lamont campus for approval.
Other Direct Costs: Requests for communications and shipping costs are nominal for
the PIs involved in the research. Tuition for the Graduate Student is requested for each
year.
F-5
0426369
Current and Pending Support
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator: Douglas Wiens
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Acquistion of a New Geophysics Computer System
National Science Foundation
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
96,999 Total Award Period Covered: 09/01/02 - 08/31/05
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: U.S. - Japan Collaborative Research: Multi-Scale Seismic
Imaging of The Marianas Subduction Factory
National Science Foundation
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
514,184 Total Award Period Covered: 10/01/01 - 09/30/05
Location of Project:
Washington Univeristy
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: Geodynamic Tomography: A new
Approach to Studies of Mantle Upwelling and its Application
to the Lau Basin and East Pacific Rise
National Science Foundation
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
75,225 Total Award Period Covered: 05/15/01 - 04/30/04
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Tonga and Fiji Seismic Arrays for Investigating Slab
Processes and Upper Mantle Phase Transformations
National Science Foundation/Earth Sciences
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
384,395 Total Award Period Covered: 04/01/01 - 03/31/05
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: A Broadband Seismic Investigation of
Deep Continental Structure Across the East-West Antarctic
Boundary
National Science Foundation/Polar Programs
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
237,000 Total Award Period Covered: 08/01/00 - 07/31/04
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Summ: 1.00
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
Page G-1
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY
0426408
Current and Pending Support
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator: Douglas Wiens
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Acquisition and Operation of Broadband Seismograph Equipment
at Chilean Bases in the Antarctic Peninsula Region
National Science Foundation/Polar Program
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
326,711 Total Award Period Covered: 04/15/99 - 04/14/04
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: Northern Andes Subduction of the
Carnegie Ridge (NASCAR)
National Science Foundation/Continental Dynamics
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
762,175 Total Award Period Covered: 01/01/05 - 12/31/09
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: Crustal Accretion and Mantle
Processes Along the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau
Spreading Center - THIS PROPOSAL
National Science Foundation
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
489,682 Total Award Period Covered: 01/01/06 - 12/31/09
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: A Broadband Seismic Experiment to
Image the Lithosphere Beneath the Gamburtsev Mountains, East
Antarctica
National Science Foundation/Polar Programs
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
381,437 Total Award Period Covered: 06/01/04 - 05/31/08
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: A Numerical Investigation of the Relative Importance of
Different Melting Mechanisms at Volcanic Arcs - AS CO-I
NSF
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
95,133 Total Award Period Covered: 07/01/03 - 06/30/05
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Summ: 0.00
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
Page G-2
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY
0426408
Current and Pending Support
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator: Douglas Wiens
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: Seismological Investigation of the
Cameroon Volcanic Line-A Hot Line in the Mantle - AS CO-I
NSF
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
364,121 Total Award Period Covered: 09/01/03 - 08/31/05
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Summ:
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
Page G-3
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY
0426408
Current and Pending Support
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator: James Conder
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: A Numerical Investigation of the Relative Importance of
Different Melting
NSF/Margins
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
95,133 Total Award Period Covered: 07/01/03 - 06/30/05
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:6.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: Crustal Accretion and Mantle
Processes Along the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau
Spreading Center - THIS PROPOSAL
National Science Foundation
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
489,682 Total Award Period Covered: 01/01/06 - 12/31/09
Location of Project:
Washington University
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:3.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:
Acad:
Summ:
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
Page G-4
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY
0426408
Current and Pending Support
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
page 1 of 2
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator:
Donna Blackman
Support:
✸ Current
❏ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Near-Bottom Geological and Geophysical Investigation of an "Oceanic Core Complex": Eastern
Atlantis Ridge-Transform Intersection Massif
Source of Support:
NSF OCE 97-12164
Total Award Amount:
$ 664,171
Total Award Period Covered:
3/1/00-12/31/04
Location of Project:
UCSD/SIO
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal: 4/4/3/3 Acad:
Sumr:
Support:
✸ Current
❏ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Observations of the Earthquake Cycle from ERS and ALOS InSAR synthetic aperture radar
Source of Support:
NSF EAR 0105896
Total Award Amount:
$ 205,001
Total Award Period Covered:7/13/01-7/12/04
Location of Project:
UCSD/SIO
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal: .75/.75/2 Acad:
Sumr:
Support:
✸ Current
❏ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Collaboratie Research: Toward a comprehensive model of mantle flow and seismic anisotropy W. US
Source of Support:
NSF EAR- CSDI
Total Award Amount:
$ 170,243
Total Award Period Covered:
1/1/04-12/31/05
Location of Project:
UCSD/SIO
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal: 2/2
Acad:
Sumr:
Support:
❏ Current
✸ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
The Effects of Lateral Offset on Lithospheric Deformation during Extension: 3-D Models of Oceanic
and Continental Core Complex Formation
Source of Support:
NSF-EAR, Tectonics
Total Award Amount:
$ 111,004
Total Award Period Covered:
5/1/04-4/30/06
Location of Project:
UCSD/SIO
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal: .5/1
Acad:
Sumr:
Support:
❏ Current
✸ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Collaborative Research: Upper Mantle Structure of Gulf of Califrnia Rupture
Source of Support:
NSF Margins
Total Award Amount:
$ 909,641
Total Award Period Covered:
4/1/04-3/31/08
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal: 0.25/0.5/1.25/2.0
Sumr:
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
NSF Form 1239 (10/99)
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY
0430463
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
page 2 of 2
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator:
Donna Blackman
Support:
❏ Current
✸ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Collaborative Research: Crustal accretion and Mantel Processess along the Subduction-Influenced
Eastern Lau Spreading Center
Source of Support:
NSF-OCE
Total Award Amount:
$ 111,837
Total Award Period Covered:
1/1/06-12/31/09
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal: 1.5/2/1.5/1Acad:
Sumr:
Support:
❏ Current
✸ Pending ❏ Submission Planned in Near Future
❏ *Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title:
Why no Rift-Drift Progression in the Laptev Sea? Insights from Numerical Modeling
Source of Support:
NSF/OCE
Total Award Amount:
$ 133,780
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Support:
❏ Current
❏ Pending ❏
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount:
$
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Support:
❏ Current
❏ Pending ❏
Project/Proposal Title:
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount:
$
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Support:
❏ Current
❏ Pending ❏
Project/Proposal Title:
Total Award Period Covered:
Cal: .5/1
Acad:
Submission Planned in Near Future
9/1/04-8/31/06
Sumr:
❏ *Transfer of Support
Total Award Period Covered:
Cal:
Acad:
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
❏ *Transfer of Support
Total Award Period Covered:
Cal:
Acad:
Submission Planned in Near Future
Sumr:
❏ *Transfer of Support
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount:
$
Total Award Period Covered:
Location of Project:
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project.
Cal:
Acad:
Sumr:
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
0430463
period.
ARY
0430463
period.
0430463
Current and Pending Support
(See GPG Section II.D.8 for guidance on information to include on this form.)
The following information should be provided for each investigator and other senior personnel. Failure to provide this information may delay consideration of this proposal.
Other agencies (including NSF) to which this proposal has been/will be submitted.
Investigator: Robert Dunn
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: This Proposal: Collaborative Research:Crustal Accretion and
Mantle Dynamics Along the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau
Spreading Center
NSF-OCE
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
392,959 Total Award Period Covered: 01/01/06 - 12/31/09
Location of Project:
University of Hawaii
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:3.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research - Seismic analyses of upper-mantle
dynamics: slow spreading and hotspot-ridge interaction in
the Atlantic
NSF-OCE 0327327
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
150,836 Total Award Period Covered: 09/01/03 - 08/31/05
Location of Project:
University of Hawaii
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:3.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 1.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Upgrade of SOEST MG&G Computing Facility
NSF OCE-0136793
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
109,880 Total Award Period Covered: 03/15/02 - 02/28/03
Location of Project:
University of Hawaii
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 0.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Collaborative Research: Mantle Dynamics Beneath the East
Pacific Rise Integrated Study Site
NSF-OCE
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
282,433 Total Award Period Covered: 03/15/06 - 03/14/09
Location of Project:
University of Hawaii
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 3.00 Sumr: 0.00
Support:
Current
Pending
Submission Planned in Near Future
*Transfer of Support
Project/Proposal Title: Three-dimensional velocity structure and crustal thickness
beneath a slow-spreading ridge
NSF-OCE 0203228
Source of Support:
Total Award Amount: $
174,838 Total Award Period Covered: 01/01/00 - 02/29/04
Location of Project:
University of Hawaii
Person-Months Per Year Committed to the Project. Cal:0.00
Acad: 3.00 Summ: 0.00
*If this project has previously been funded by another agency, please list and furnish information for immediately preceding funding period.
Page G-1
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY
0426428
CURRENT AND PENDING SUPPORT
2/17/2004
SPAHR WEBB
A
Supporting
Agency
B
Project
Title
C
Award
Amount
D
E
F
Period Man-Month Location
Covered Acad. Sum.
Award
Cal.
A. Current Support
NSF
#10223R
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH:
A REAL-TIME NEARSHORE SEAFLOOR SEISMIC STATION. (WEBB,
S., PI; w/ JONKE, P.)
200,467
11/1/2003
10/31/2004
0.5
LDEO
NSF
OCE 02-40990
UPGRADE OF THE OLD LDEO OBS IN
THE NSF NATIONAL OBS POOL.
(WEBB, S., PI; w/ JONKE, P.)
272,136
3/15/2003
2/28/2004
N/C
LDEO
NSF
OCE 03-17888
TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF MAN-MADE ACOUSTICS
SOURCES AND WHALES.
(TOLSTOY, M., PI; DIEBOLD, J., CO-PI;
194,641
5/1/2003
4/30/2004
N/C
LDEO
WEBB, S., CO-PI)
NSF
OCE 01-17333
A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR COMPLIANCE MEASUREMENTS. (WEBB, S.,
PI)
199,957
10/1/2001
9/30/2004
0.25
LDEO
NSF
OCE 99-12380
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH:
INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF
NON-HOTSPOT, INTRAPLATE VOLCANIC RIDGES AND CROSS GRAIN
GRAVITY LINEATIONS.
(LANGMUIR, C., PI; WEBB, S., CO-PI;
w/ GOLDSTEIN, S.)
706,777
5/1/2001
4/30/2004
1/1/1
LDEO
NSF
OCE 99-07756
OPERATION OF AN OCEAN BOTTOM
SEISMIC INSTRUMENT POOL AT
LDEO FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE
COMMUNITY - (WEBB, S., PI;
LERNER-LAM, A., TOLSTOY, M.,
CO-PI's; w/ JONKE, P.)
1,854,616
7/1/2000
12/31/2004
1.5/3
LDEO
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH:
CRUSTAL ACCRETION AND MANTLE
PROCESSES ALONG THE
SUBDUCTION-INFLUENCED
EASTERN LAU SPREADING CENTER.
(WEBB, S., PI; MENKE, W., CO-PI)
395,944
B. Pending Support
NSF
#10717
1/1/2006 1/1/.25/.25
12/31/2009
LDEO
G-1
0426369
SPAHR WEBB
A
Supporting
Agency
B
Project
Title
C
Award
Amount
D
E
F
Period Man-Month Location
Covered Acad. Sum.
Award
Cal.
NSF
#10747
A COMPLIANCE STUDY OF PARTIAL
MELT IN THE CRUST BENEATH THE
EPR AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF
MELT TO TECTONICS AND
CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRUST.
(WEBB, S., PI; w/ JONKE, P.)
305,025
1/1/2005
12/31/2006
1/1
LDEO
NSF
#10750
TESTING MODELS OF MAGMA
MOVEMENT ALONG THE EAST
PACIFIC RISE USING COMBINED
GEODETIC AND NUMERICAL
EXPERIMENTS. (CORMIER, M, PI;
BUCK, W.R., WEBB, S., CO-PI's;
w/ JONKE, P.)
685,473
10/15/2004
10/14/2009
1/0/0/0/1
LDEO
NSF
#10736
MEGATHRUST SEISMIC HAZARDS
BY REFLECTION MAPPING.
(NEDIMOVIC, M., PI; WEBB, S.;
DIEBOLD, J.; CO-PI's)
541,952
3/1/2005 1.25/.25/.25
2/28/2008
LDEO
NSF
#10684
YEAR 5 OF OCE 99-07756:
OPERATION OF AN OCEAN BOTTOM
SEISMIC INSTRUMENT POOL AT
LAMONT-DOHERTY EARTH
OBSERVATORY FOR THE
BENEFIT OF THE COMMUITY.
(WEBB, S., PI; LERNER-LAM, A.,
TOLSTOY, M, CO-PI's; w/ JONKE, P.)
505,375
1/1/2004
12/31/2004
2
LDEO
C. Outstanding Increments
NSF
#10223R
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH:
A REAL-TIME NEARSHORE SEAFLOOR SEISMIC STATION. (WEBB,
S., PI; w/ JONKE, P.)
202,313
11/1/2004
10/31/2006
1/1
LDEO
NSF
OCE 03-17888
YEAR 2 OF OCE 03-17888:
TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF MAN-MADE ACOUSTICS
SOURCES AND WHALES.
(TOLSTOY, M., PI; DIEBOLD, J., CO-PI;
WEBB, S., CO-PI)
83,424
5/1/2004
4/30/2005
N/C
LDEO
G-2
0426369
SPAHR WEBB
A
Supporting
Agency
NSF
OCE 99-07756
B
Project
Title
C
Award
Amount
YEAR 5 OF OCE 99-07756:
OPERATION OF AN OCEAN BOTTOM
SEISMIC INSTRUMENT POOL AT
LDEO FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE
COMMUNITY - (WEBB, S., PI;
LERNER-LAM, A., TOLSTOY, M.,
CO-PI's, w/ JONKE, P.)
TBD
D
E
F
Period Man-Month Location
Covered Acad. Sum.
Award
Cal.
1/1/2004
12/31/2004
2
LDEO
D. Proposals Planned to be Submitted in Near Future:
NONE
E. Transfer of Support:
NONE
F. Other Agencies to Which Proposal Has Been/Will be Submitted:
NONE
G-3
0426369
CURRENT AND PENDING SUPPORT
2/17/2004
WILLIAM MENKE
A
Supporting
Agency
B
Project
Title
C
Award
Amount
D
E
F
Period Man-Month Location
Covered Acad. Sum.
Award
Cal.
A. Current Support
NSF
OCE 02-21035
INTEGRATING GEOPHYSICAL AND
GEOCHEMICAL DATA INTO NEW
AXIAL VOLCANO MAGMA
CHAMBER MODEL. (MENKE, W., PI)
163,658
10/1/2002
9/30/2004
1
LDEO
NASA
NGT5-30374
FELLOWSHIP:
POLARIMETRIC SYNTHETIC
APERTURE RADAR (SAR) ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT FOR
NATURAL DISASTER ASSESSMENT.
(MENKE, W., Advisor; RODRIGUEZ, K.
PI)
70,000
9/1/2001
8/31/2004
N/C/YR
LDEO
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH:
CRUSTAL ACCRETION AND MANTLE
PROCESSES ALONG THE
SUBDUCTION-INFLUENCED
EASTERN LAU SPREADING CENTER.
(WEBB, S., PI; MENKE, W., CO-PI)
395,944
1/1/2006 .25/.25/.25/
12/31/2009
.25
B. Pending Support
NSF
#10717
LDEO
C. Outstanding Increments
NONE
D. Proposals Planned to be Submitted in Near Future:
NONE
E. Transfer of Support:
NONE
F. Other Agencies to Which Proposal Has Been/Will be Submitted:
NONE
G-4
0426369
FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES
FACILITIES: Identify the facilities to be used at each performance site listed and, as appropriate, indicate their capacities, pertinent
capabilities, relative proximity, and extent of availability to the project. Use "Other" to describe the facilities at any other performance
sites listed and at sites for field studies. USE additional pages as necessary.
Laboratory:
Clinical:
Animal:
Computer:
The seismology group at Washington University maintain a system of
workstations and peripherals. The system consists of an 8 processor Sun
Fire V880 server, a 1.4 Terrabyte RAID disk farm, and the following
workstations and peripherals:
Office:
Other:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT: List the most important items available for this project and, as appropriate identifying the location and pertinent
capabilities of each.
OTHER RESOURCES: Provide any information describing the other resources available for the project. Identify support services
such as consultant, secretarial, machine shop, and electronics shop, and the extent to which they will be available for the project.
Include an explanation of any consortium/contractual arrangements with other organizations.
Washington University owns 4 broadband seismic systems, consisting
of Strekeisen STS-2 broadband seismographs, Reftek 24 bit data
acquisition systems with GPS timing, and external hard disks. These
systems are probably available for this project to supplement
PASSCAL equipment (pending other project commitments).
0426408
FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES
Continuation Page:
COMPUTER FACILITIES (continued):
2 SunBlade 2000 workstations (2 processors each)
2 Ultrasparc 2/400 workstations (2 processors each)
2 SunBlade 100 workstations
3 Ultrasparc 5 workstations
3 Ultrasparc 1/140 workstations
5 Linux/Windows/Macintosh personal computers
DLT, Exabyte, DAT tape drives
a large format color printer
several other color and B/W printers
Computer support is provided by Patrick Shore. The workstations are well
equipped with standard geophysical software packages (sac2000, ah,
antelope, matlab, Passcal database, GMT).
NSF FORM 1363 (10/99)
0426408
FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES
FACILITIES: Identify the facilities to be used at each performance site listed and, as appropriate, indicate their capacities, pertinent
capabilities, relative proximity, and extent of availability to the project. Use "Other" to describe the facilities at any other performance
sites listed and at sites for field studies. USE additional pages as necessary.
Laboratory:
Clinical:
Animal:
Computer:
SUN Blade 100 1.792 GB RAM, SUN Ultra 5, Macintosh G4
We will apply to use San Diego Supercomputer Center Facilities, here at
UCSD, for some aspects of the work.
Office:
Munk Lab, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Offices #322 & 317
Other:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT: List the most important items available for this project and, as appropriate identifying the location and pertinent
capabilities of each.
OTHER RESOURCES: Provide any information describing the other resources available for the project. Identify support services
such as consultant, secretarial, machine shop, and electronics shop, and the extent to which they will be available for the project.
Include an explanation of any consortium/contractual arrangements with other organizations.
0430463
FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES
FACILITIES: Identify the facilities to be used at each performance site listed and, as appropriate, indicate their capacities, pertinent
capabilities, relative proximity, and extent of availability to the project. Use "Other" to describe the facilities at any other performance
sites listed and at sites for field studies. USE additional pages as necessary.
Laboratory:
SOEST Marine Geophysics Computational Facility: POST 834,835 computer
labs.
Clinical:
N/A
Animal:
N/A
Computer:
32 Processor Linux cluster with 1TB storage
SUN Blade 1000 and Dell/linux workstations
Various Macintosh, Laser printers, plotters, tape drives.
Office:
POST Room 819D (Dunn office)
Other:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT: List the most important items available for this project and, as appropriate identifying the location and pertinent
capabilities of each.
32 Processor Linux cluster for seismic data analysis with 1TB available
disk space. Located in POST Building.
OTHER RESOURCES: Provide any information describing the other resources available for the project. Identify support services
such as consultant, secretarial, machine shop, and electronics shop, and the extent to which they will be available for the project.
Include an explanation of any consortium/contractual arrangements with other organizations.
Project specific administrative services by E. Norris, as assigned by PI.
0426428
FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT & OTHER RESOURCES
FACILITIES: Identify the facilities to be used at each performance site listed and, as appropriate, indicate their capacities, pertinent
capabilities, relative proximity, and extent of availability to the project. Use “Other” to describe the facilities at any other performance
sites listed and at sites for field studies. Use additional pages if necessary.
Laboratory:
3,000 sq. ft.Ocean Bottom Seismometer lab building with electronics, mechanical and testing labs
Clinical:
N/A
Animal:
N/A
Computer:
Computing resources at LDEO include an extensive network of Sun workstations, fileservers and peripherals. There is
also a large amount of site-licensed software available for interactive data manipulation and graphical visualization.
Office:
150 sq. ft. office for PI
3 100 sq. ft. offices in OBS Lab Building for engineers/techs
Other:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT: List the most important items available for this project and, as appropriate, identify the location and
pertinent capabilities of each.
OTHER RESOURCES: Provide any information describing the other resources available for the project. Identify support services
such as consultant, secretarial, machine shop, and electronics shop, and the extent to which they will be available for the project.
Include an explanation of any consortium/contractual/subaward arrangements with other organizations.
Pressure Test Facility
Machine Shop
Testing Pool
NSF Form 1363 (10/99)
H-1
0426369
No. 0404_R1
OBSIP
U.S. National Ocean Bottom Seismic Instrumentation Pool
This is an informational budget provided to prospective users of instruments in the U.S. National Ocean Bottom
Seismic Instrumentation Pool. The institutional instrument contributors (IICs) to the National Pool will provide
complete engineering and technical support for OBS operations at sea. The cost of providing this support (e.g.,
instrument charges, personnel support, shipping and travel) will be funded directly through the Pool; these costs do not
need to be included in individual science proposals. NSF does, however, require PIs to provide an informational budget
estimating these costs in any proposal requesting OBSIP instruments. For more information on OBSIP, see
http://www.obsip.org.
Project title:
Crustal Accretion and Mantle Processes Along the Subduction-Influenced Eastern Lau Spreading Center
Principal Investigator(s):
Funding Agency:
NSF/MGG/RIDGE
Submission deadline:
Instruments:
D. Wiens, S. Webb, D. Blackman, W. Menke, J. Conder
February 15, 2004
OBS Passive Broadband
55
2 deployments of 55 instruments
Date of proposed experiment:
June 2006 to April 2007
Logistics: One leg of 39 days to deploy 55 instruments for two weeks, then redeploy same instruments for 10 months
in June 2006.
One leg of 15 days to recover 55 instruments in April 2007.
Ports: Tonga
The following is an estimate of the cost of supporting the OBS operations requested in this proposal. These costs are
subject to change depending on the scheduling of this project, the length and ports of the deployment and recovery legs,
and the OBSIP institution that supports this project. A final budget for OBS support operations for this project will be
negotiated as part of the annual cooperative agreement between NSF and the Pool IICs.
OBS Instrument drop charge:
4,294 per instrument*
(includes batteries, deployment and, if applicable, redeployment costs)
OBS engineering and technical support cost:
(on shore and at sea)
Shipping:
Travel:
Estimated total:
472,304
363,957
118,800
63,329
$1,018,390
* Varies from proposal to proposal based on the mix of instrument types and deployment lengths
Robert S. Detrick
Chair, OBSIP Management Committee
February 12, 2004
0426408
OBSIP Instrument Use Policies and Procedures
The U.S. National Ocean Bottom Seismic Instrumentation Pool (OBSIP) provides
seismic instruments to support research on the structure and tectonics of the ocean basins,
their margins, and the dynamics and structure of the Earth's interior. Funded through the
National Science Foundation, the Pool makes ocean bottom seismic equipment available
to NSF investigators, and to investigators at research or educational institutions with
other government, private or industry funding.
The intent of these guidelines is to establish the procedures to enable investigators to
request OBSIP instruments, to let them know what requirements and responsibilities are
incurred in using OBSIP instruments, and to inform potential users of when and how
decisions on instrument use will be made. The efficient use of OBSIP instruments will
require close cooperation among all parties involved. The Principal Investigator is
encouraged to contact the Chair of the OBSIP Management Group during the proposal
development stage with any questions regarding OBSIP policies and procedures.
Information on the numbers and technical specification of OBSIP instruments, and
scheduled commitments of these instruments, is available through the OBSIP web page at
http://www.obsip.org.
For NSF-funded projects, all OBS costs will be supported through cooperative
agreements between NSF and the individual Institutional Instrument Contributors
providing instruments to the Pool (currently Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution). Thus,
OBS costs do not have to be included in science budgets proposed to NSF; however,
since the costs come from Marine Geology and Geophysics and Ocean Drilling Program
funds, an informational budget must be included (see below). OBSIP instruments may
also be used in non-NSF funded programs on an "as available" basis. Non-NSF users
(except the USGS Woods Hole Field Office which is also contributing instruments to the
Pool) will be charged an OBSIP Facility Use Fee in addition to the normal OBS charges.
Procedures for Requesting OBSIP Instruments
Any research or educational institution may request the use of OBSIP instruments for
experiments of scientific merit. An OBSIP Instrument Request form must be submitted
to the OBSIP Management Group prior to proposal submission. The form is available on
the OBSIP web page and may be electronically submitted from there.
Each request will at a minimum include the following information:
1. Date of Request
2. Project name and short project description
3. Names and contact information for the lead PI
4. Funding agency, program and proposal deadline
5. Number and type of instruments required
6. Number of deployments, length of deployments, time between deployments
7. Number of legs, length of legs, proposed ports, proposed cruise dates
1
0426408
8. Proposed ship(s)
9. Other special requirements
Note: maximum deployment time (without recovery) will be 12-15 months, depending on
sampling rate; maximum deployment depth is 5500 m of water
NSF Proposal Submission
An OBSIP Informational Budget *must* be included in NSF proposals requesting OBSIP
instruments. NSF may not review proposals which do not include this informational
budget. The 1-page OBSIP Informational Budget will include a summary of instrument
mobilization and demobilization costs, instrument drop charges, technical and
engineering support costs, and travel and shipping costs. This informational budget will
be prepared by the Chair of the OBSIP Management Group and emailed to the PI when
an Instrument Request Form is submitted. This informational budget will be in pdf
format. This pdf file should be uploaded to the NSF Fastlane system in the
"supplementary documentation" section of the NSF Fastlane proposal submission
website.
If a proposal is a resubmission, a new Instrument Request Form should be submitted and
a new, updated OBSIP Informational Budget will be provided.
None of the costs that appear in the OBSIP Informational Budget should be included in
the project's science budget. The project’s science budget will, however, need to include
travel and salary costs for other personnel, and any other costs not specifically covered in
the OBSIP Informational Budget (see below for PI Responsibilities).
Non-NSF Projects
OBSIP will support non-NSF funded experiments if instrumentation is available. An
OBSIP Instrument Request Form must be submitted and approved by the OBSIP
Management Group. Funding will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis. Typically, a
subcontract will be negotiated between the non-NSF user and the Pool institution
designated to support this experiment. In addition to the normal use charges, non-NSF
users (except the USGS Woods Hole Field Office which is also contributing instruments
to the Pool) will be charged an OBSIP Facility Use Fee in addition to the normal OBS
charges. This Facility Use Fee will depend on the number of instruments and length of
deployment and will be used to reduce NSF base support costs for the Pool.
Scheduling of OBSIP instruments
The OBSIP Management Group, in consultation with NSF, is responsible for the
scheduling of OBSIP instruments. The OBSIP Management Group will typically meet in
June or July of each year to schedule experiments for the following calendar year. Only
experiments with confirmed funding and ship time will be entered into the schedule.
Scheduling priorities will be set in the following order:
1. Programs funded by the Ocean Sciences Division of NSF;
2. Programs funded by other divisions of NSF;
2
0426408
3. Programs funded by other US government agencies*; and
4. Other funded programs
* USGS will have first priority for use of the 15 USGS OBH/S instruments in the Pool;
USGS will be the highest priority non-NSF user for other instruments in the Pool
All other conditions being equal, the highest scheduling priority will go to experiments
with the earliest funding dates, then the earliest request dates. The goal of the scheduling
is to optimize the use of the instruments, and to accommodate as many experiments as
possible. Therefore, it will sometimes be necessary to negotiate with the PI the exact
type and number of instruments, or to move the scheduled time of an experiment.
Funded programs which cannot be scheduled, will be placed on a waiting list for
scheduling at the earliest possible date consistent with the scheduling criteria outlined
above. In some cases, especially for work in remote areas, ship scheduling may drive
OBS scheduling.
The OBSIP Management Group will make the final decision on which Institutional
Instrument Contributor supports a given experiment.
Requests can be made for OBSIP instruments at any time of the year. Instruments will be
made available to users for rapid response studies as the schedule permits.
The OBSIP Management Group will publish a schedule of future instrument use on the
OBSIP web page. Funded, but not yet scheduled programs, will also be listed on the
OBSIP web site.
OBSIP Responsibilities:
OBSIP and its Institutional Instrument Contributors will be responsible for all operations
and equipment relevant to seagoing operations involving OBSIP seismic instrumentation.
This includes:
•
•
•
•
•
•
ocean bottom seismic instrumentation and related equipment
expendables (e.g. anchors, batteries, etc.) for instrument operations
technical and engineering support personnel for instrument operation
shipping of instruments and ancillary equipment to and from ship
travel of OBSIP personnel to and from ship
provide one copy of data in standard format (e.g. segy or seed) to the PI and one
copy to the IRIS DMC
For NSF-funded projects, all OBS costs will be supported through the cooperative
agreements between NSF and the individual Institutional Instrument Contributors
supporting a funded experiment.
PI Responsibilities:
The responsibilities of the PI in seagoing operations utilizing OBSIP equipment are:
3
0426408
1. All prospective users are required to submit an OBSIP Instrument Request Form
(available on the OBSIP web site). NSF proposals utilizing OBSIP instruments are
required to include a 1-page OBSIP informational budget with estimated costs of the
OBS operations. Requests for OBSIP Informational Budgets should be made to the Chair
of the OBSIP Management Group at least 2 weeks prior to a proposal deadline. NonNSF users must also submit an OBSIP Instrument Request Form.
2. PIs are required to provide all non-instrument support personnel for the project. This
includes watchstanders for recording deployment/recovery information (e.g. instrument
locations, etc.) and communicating with the bridge, and personnel for assisting with deck
operations during instrument deployments and recoveries. Since OBS operations
continue around the clock, this typically requires 4-6 cruise participants in addition to the
PI and OBSIP personnel. The involvement of extra people beyond these minimum
requirements is always encouraged. Certain cruise scenarios may require more or less
personnel depending upon the workload; we recommend contacting the OBSIP
Management Group Chair to discuss cruise logistics before proposal submission.
3. OBSIP technicians and engineers will not normally be available for other shipboard
duties (e.g. watchstanding) during non-OBS operational periods. If OBS personnel are
needed for other operations, written approval must be obtained from the OBSIP
Management Group prior to the leg and additional costs (e.g. overtime) must be paid by
the PI.
4. The PI is responsible for requesting sufficient ship time for all OBS operations and for
handling all cruise logistics and interactions with the research vessel operator (e.g.
clearances, port locations, schedule changes, personnel). Some guidelines for estimating
ship time are given below. It is strongly recommended that each PI consult with the
OBSIP Management Group to insure that adequate ship time for OBS operations has
been requested. It is expected that OBS operations will normally take place from
UNOLS vessels; utilization of a non-UNOLS vessel requires prior approval of the OBSIP
Management Group and a certification in writing from the Captain that the vessel meets
UNOLS safety standards.
5. PIs planning OBS operations in areas with unusual risks (e.g., severe weather, currents
or seas; unusually shallow (<100 m) or deep (>5000 m) water depths, intensive bottom
fishing; foreign waters in areas of political unrest) are required to notify the OBSIP
Management Group of these conditions well in advance of the experiment.
6. The PI/Chief Scientist has ultimate responsibility for the safety of OBSIP personnel
and the return of all OBSIP instruments and equipment. The PI/Chief Scientist should
consult with the senior OBSIP engineer/technician on the leg regarding all OBS
operations. If the senior OBSIP engineer/technician determines that conditions represent
undue risks to OBSIP personnel or instrumentation, or if there is not an adequate plan for
instrument recovery, they may terminate OBS operations.
4
0426408
7. All data acquired with OBSIP instruments will be archived at the IRIS DMC. The
OBSIP operating institution will submit the data to the IRIS DMC; the PI must provide
all necessary ancillary data (instrument locations, shot times etc.) to the OBSIP
technicians prior to the end of the recovery leg. The data will be proprietary to PIs for 24
months from the date of the end of the instrument recovery leg. After this period, all data
will be available to any interested investigator.
8. In any publications or reports resulting from the use of OBSIP instruments, please
include the following statement in the acknowledgements section:
"The instruments used in this field program were provided by the U.S. National Ocean
Bottom Seismic Instrumentation Pool which is funded by the Ocean Sciences Division of
the National Science Foundation through cooperative agreements with Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution. Data collected during this experiment will be available through the IRIS Data
Management Center."
Please provide the Chair of the OBSIP Management Group with copies of any
publications related to your experiment.
Guidelines for Estimating Deployment and Recovery Times
The following estimates should be used as a guideline for planning the duration of a
cruise, as well as for estimating the time required for OBS shipboard operations:
1 hour/deployment for active source (short-deployment) experiments
2 hour/deployment for passive source (long-deployment) experiments
4 hr/recovery for all recoveries
0.25 hour contingency time (minimum) for each instrument deployment and recovery
These times do not include the transit time between instrument sites. However, they do
take into account the time it takes to maneuver the ship on site and to acoustically
interrogate the instrument. For recoveries, these time estimates also include time for the
instrument to rise through the water column, reach the surface, maneuver the ship to the
instrument, and recover the instrument.
Multiple deployment experiments with a fast turn-around time may require slightly more
time between deployments for data recovery and instrument preparation. Additional
contingency time should be allocated in areas with severe weather.
We strongly encourage that PI's talk to the OBSIP Management Group Chair to discuss
additional questions or concerns regarding cruise logistics.
This policy has been approved by the OBSIP Management Group effective 12/8/2000.
5
0426408
==================================================================
=============
UNOLS Ship Time Request Form - Section ONE
==================================================================
=============
UNOLS Request ID #: 20030212204716ZJ
Version #:
005
Last Modified:
2004/02/18 18:56 EST
Date Issued:
2004/02/18 18:56 EST
==================================================================
=============
P.I. Name Last: Wiens
First: Douglas
MI: A.
==================================================================
=============
Institution: Washington University
Research vessel required for:
Address: 1 Brookings Drive
_ Ancillary Only
St. Louis, MO 63130
X Principal Use
_ No Ship Required
_ Long Range Planning Document
==================================================================
=============
Phone: 314-935-6517 Fax: 314-935-7361 Email: [email protected]
==================================================================
=============
Co P.I. Name
Institution
Co P.I. Name
Institution
------------------------------------------Spahr Webb
Lamont-Doherty
Robb Dunn
U. of Hawaii
==================================================================
=============
Proposal Title:
--------------Collaborative Research: Crustal accretion and mantle processes along the
subduction-influenced Eastern Lau Spreading Center
==================================================================
=============
Large Program Name: RIDGE2000
Research Purpose: Marine Geophysics
If Other, specify:
If Other, specify:
==================================================================
=============
New Proposal? Y
Agency Submitted to: Foreign EEZ? Y
Funded Grant? N
NSF/OCE/MGG
Kingdom of Tonga
Institutional Proposal #: Amount Requested:
Area(s) of Operation:
$1.4 M
SP1
Agency Proposal #:
Lat/Long:
Renewal? N
Start Date: 1/1/2006 Begin: 19S 178W
0426408
Grant #:
End Date: 8/31/2008
End: 23S 175W
==================================================================
=============
Ship(s) Requested # Science
Year (Name or Size)
Days Req. Optimum Dates Alternate Dates
---- ----------------- --------- ------------- --------------2006 Maurice Ewing
39
6/1/2006
2007 Large
15
10 months after
deployment
==================================================================
=============
Total Science & Ship Days Needed: --------------- PORTS -----------54
Start:
Intermediate:
End:
Number in Science Party:
Nuku'alofa,
Nuku'alofa,
12
Tonga
Tonga
==================================================================
=============
Equipment Required:
X Vans
X P-Code GPS X MCS _ Alvin _ DSL 120
_ Dynamic Positioning
X Multibeam _ SCS _ ROV
_ 680 Cond.
_ Helicopter Operation
==================================================================
=============
Other Special Equipment; Comments:
---------------------------------1st cruise will deploy 55 OBSs, shoot airguns, and redeploy the OBSs
2nd cruise will retrieve OBS
requires a gravimeter
==================================================================
=============
0426408