Assessing Your Institution’s Financial Health Using the CFI FOCUS Virginia Commonwealth University November 14, 2014 Larry Goldstein, President, Campus Strategies, LLC © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 1 BACKGROUND © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 2 Background US higher education ratio analysis initially relied on data collected through HEGIS— Higher Education General Information Survey (US Department of Education) ◦ HEGIS began in 1966 and continued until 1987 when it was replaced by IPEDS— Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System No utilization of financial statements for ratios until 1995… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 3 Background Ratio Analysis in Higher Education, fourth edition (1999) by KPMG and Prager, McCarthy & Sealy, LLC—a significant advance ◦ Introduced Strategic Resource Allocation matrix Composite Financial Index (CFI) Combining selected ratios to produce overall score ◦ Relevant only to private institutions… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 4 Background Fifth edition (2002) applied CFI to public institutions ◦ New concepts Adaptation of ratios to reflect then-new GASB reporting model Inclusion of FASB support organizations in ratio calculations… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 5 Background Seventh edition released summer 2010 ◦ Extends scale for CFI ◦ Revisions to ratios Drops alternative to net operating revenues ratio for private institutions Requires the establishment of an operating measure—whether or not reported externally… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 6 Background ◦ Significant emphasis on liquidity due to impact of Great Recession on higher education—introduces new ratio ◦ Encourages averaging ratios over multiple years ◦ Deemphasizes peer comparison in favor of trend analysis—assess institution over time, not against others ◦ Encourages projecting ratios for strategic purposes… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 7 CONTEXT © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 8 Context Why calculate financial ratios? From the sixth edition, “We believe the fundamental concept of assessing financial health by using a limited number of ratios has improved the financial health of colleges and universities.” (emphasis added) Just as important, it helps nonaccountants understand institutions’ financial health… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 9 Context Ratios are valuable for those who do not understand how to interpret and analyze higher education financial statements Trustees, faculty, students, and other interested parties can use the ratios to gain an understanding of the institution’s financial health… Reduces complexity of GAAP-basis financial statement analysis… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 10 Context Facilitates peer assessment Shifts focus to a more global level Supports strategic decision making Demonstrates financial impacts of key decisions Assists with performance assessment ◦ Creditworthiness ◦ Relative liquidity, financial viability, and leverage of resources ◦ Financial assets’ performance… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 11 Context Principles ◦ Use ratios to measure acquisition / use of resources in support of mission ◦ Focus on summary information to address key questions ◦ Present a select number of ratios to provide answers Additional detail when necessary… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 12 Context ◦ Focus on trends in ratios Some trends are evident from internal examination / review Other trends arise through comparisons with others Never make decisions based on comparison to other institutions using CFI—only underlying ratios • © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 13 Questions? © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 14 COMPOSITE FINANCIAL INDEX (CFI) © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 15 CFI Combines four principal ratios Primary reserve ratio Viability ratio Return on net assets ratio Net operating revenues ratio… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 16 Ratios ◦ Standard weighting for each ratio, but can be adapted for unique situations Weighting should remain fairly static over time In addition to four principal ratios, seventh edition presents 13 secondary ratios… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 17 Ratios Primary reserve ratio—35 percent ◦ Indicates the sufficiency of resources and their flexibility Expendable net assets / total expenses Unless otherwise specified, expendable net assets restricted for plant purposes are excluded… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 18 Ratios Viability ratio—35 percent ◦ Indicates the capacity to repay total debt through reserves Expendable net assets / long-term debt… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 19 Ratios Return on net assets ratio—20 percent ◦ Indicates whether the institution is better off financially this year than last Change in net assets / beginning net assets… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 20 Ratios Net operating revenues ratio—10 percent ◦ Indicates whether institution is living within available resources Operating surplus or deficit / operating revenues © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 21 GRAPHIC FINANCIAL PROFILE PRIMARY RESERVE RATIO 10 10 3 3 NET OPERATING REVENUES RATIO RETURN ON NET ASSETS RATIO 3 3 10 10 VIABILITY RATIO © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 22 Threshold Values Financial health pegged at 3, equating to Primary Reserve: 140 days of operations Actually more due to depreciation Viability: 1.25 times total debt owed Return on Net Assets: 6% return on combined financial / nonfinancial assets Net Operating Revenues: 2% net surplus to increase reserves • © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 23 Questions? © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 24 OTHER ISSUES © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 25 Other Issues What to do about affiliated entities ◦ Include them! Necessary for a comprehensive picture of the institution and its operations ◦ GASB Statement No. 39 (component units) facilitated this by requiring inclusion of significant entities What about omitted entities—due to criteria or significance?... © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 26 Other Issues ◦ Potential problem with double-counting of some items Disbursements from foundation to institution is treated as expense by foundation and, once expended by institution, as expense by institution Consolidation would address through elimination, but not always available… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 27 Other Issues Comparisons between institutions ◦ Very risky due to inconsistencies Especially between public and private ◦ Helps if institutions have similar mission ◦ Optimal comparison occurs within affinity groups Examples include ACC,VCCS institutions, etc… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 28 Other Issues Limitations / pitfalls of financial ratio analysis ◦ It is not a substitute for understanding the financial statements themselves; it shines a light on the statements’ content but can’t tell the entire story ◦ It should not be used to mask poor financial performance ◦ It is but one quantitative measure… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 29 Other Issues ◦ Appropriate assessment—financial or otherwise—requires both quantitative and qualitative analysis Financial ratios should not be used as a substitute for qualitative judgments It should be supplemented with other factors… © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 30 Other Issues ◦ Peer comparisons without longitudinal analysis can be misleading ◦ Longitudinal analysis without peer comparisons can be misleading Five-year periods seem to work well Consistently applied ratio analysis is essential • © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 31 Resources Strategic Financial Analysis for Higher Education, seventh edition, by Prager, Sealy & Co., LLC, KPMG LLP, and Attain LLC ◦ Available through KPMG or NACUBO www.nacubo.org © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 32 Using Financial Ratios to Assess Institutional Financial Health Questions, Comments, and Reactions [email protected] (540) 942-9146 © Campus Strategies, LLC November 14, 2014 33
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz