Adaptation of Tree Fruit Varieties in Klamath Basin, 1955

/
riinGRES3 REPOaT FOB 1955
KLAHATH EXPFRIMENTAL AREA,
'PROJECT TITLE:
Adaptation of Tree Fruit V1-iPties in Klamath Baein
Sub-Frojeot: Wild Plum
DEPIIRTMIWPS COOPERATING
Klamath Experimental Area
Department of Horticulture
PfliSONNEL:
A. E. Gross, Superintendent
Dr. A. IL Roberts
NATURE An EXTENT OF WORK . DONE THIS YEAR:
No new trees were established this year„
Many of the plums hors
quantities were picked
These lots of jam were
Kendall using a relApo
recipe follows:
thia year for the fir2t, time Large enough
to make some quality studies as wild plum
made by Mrs. Harriet Gross and Mrs. 1-,averno
devRloped by local people over the years. The
Waah and el%
6 cups plums
5 cups sugar
Bring to rolling boil, but do not boil more than
six minutes.
effort was made to proess9 each lot •exactly
i to tha Food Technology r
of these jams .,.othar interested ptien
U
rs of t:T ,e Static
of this infornAtion is gfi:Tee
, A
kc
dation.
flaveT
Lake
VB
and.
VIIJ
and
Klamath I were ,consiclered.
Generally
in Table
to be
RAM J'OR r.',OMING YEAR.:
Pc.7, s...:ud.t production peTRite we would like 117,3 Obtain addit:
yields in relation In root stalk and additional Lnfon , ,„on on
as
of . ,ne, various wild plum selections,
TADLE...• ,
Selection
No
Lake I
Tree
No -32-
Moot
3.toek
Lake II
rf,1
Pperh
Lake 11
126
Lovell
Lake TM,
63
Peach
Lake TIA
69
Peach
100
112
Peach
7„00
55
Peach
2.50 Lake IV
7 8_
SUMMARY 19!35 DATA ON 1 4ITD PLUMS AND JAN
Lake VA
PacH
Lake VA
70
Peach
Lake VB
5'6
Peach
ADS
7.50 ip„Lam
ei 97QP.
2.75 "
Bitter
9”75 "
7.73
Lake VIII
57
Peach
13,50
93 "
12. Lake VIjI
62
Peach
1). Lake VIII • 72
Peach
19.25 "
Peach
7.95 ".
- Swot
cm
1.92 - Bitter
*Score pointe,;
hyro
I Bitter;
me
ft
9.70
ft,
0,32
5 Sweet.
mm
ex.
Generally con5iderec good
,Jaeok,
Uniform.
Mostly good to excellent.
C/ing.
10„32 o
8.75 n1
0.07 "
3 Med-Bitter; bt.
em
Cling.
1J46 - Bitter
Mod .Biter
Considered fair to excellent‘ 1.92 - Bitter
Mod. Bitter
Uniform rating
WY
107
ens
Uniform rating - considered good.
Med.Bitter
4.77 - Sweet
9-70
Not goo.
=
Med.Bitter
15. Lake XX
17. Klamath I
Mostly bittor-ono sweet rating. 735 fq
10.25 "
24.50 "
Med.Bitter
,
Nide variation from bitter to.
2.23 - Med.Bittor
Peach
Peach
Also wide variation - bitter tc a=ot
.43
68
16. Klamath I - 6i.
Med.Bitter
3015 - Med.Bittor
7.36 "
9,25 u....
Other Comments
ommeo.tti
variation from IEirter to vexTyieeit
71avor
.o.editter
1 15
7.57
2.50 0.S.C. Flavor*
Evaluation
1.62 - Bitter
6.97
Lake
Lake X
.
Total
301 - Ned.Bitter
eweet
!IP
MM
M.
M.
Cling.
a.
Sweet
Uniform rating-consido,ved very good if,)
excellent
Sweet
All considered it very good to excaLent.
-
t3p1.1.1
"e
7 1:ITELid,
Sri.d.S
TABLE:raft 1954 SUGAR BEET VARIETY TRIAL
m Muck Experimental Area - Planted April 19, 1954. •
Narvest---, d October 28, 1954
Plot
No.Roote
Wt./plot
Mo.
Ilt
V
./so
per
Plot
____,
T- --Lbs
Tons .
---,r-crr,
70--117-ST
2
l'IA
IE .
5)16
me x 226
55
84 -
u
L,54
1.1.11,0"3 . : ,9
WO .
63
100
35
/2
90
80
L .8
59
5
56
79
98
2/3
31 :;
i
i
89
105
s.
13.6.
•
2 ..
83
ft
n
8
g '='10. 7
.."
7
49
C,
110
1.39
)
14.3
100 rt. of r
62 •
88
;1
10
PI
60
13
U
35/2
2°)6 ma x 226
400
121
10L
98
.107
100•
96
111
'2A.
:!"!-;
d
'T
2Lf
1.o6
1.51
7 ,--,
,=
-,
a:''
per Acre
ion
85
.88
21,
L 18
.
,
1.66
1.42
1.39
1
1.66
2.02
1.92
h- 6-2h-16-2.
4 rows bloi
harvests
A-.7"