Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agenda I. ACTION ITEMS A. Medical Center Acquisition of 500 Ray C. Hunt Drive II. REPORTS A. Treasury Report B. University of Virginia Investment Management Company Report on the Long-Term Pool – Market Value and Performance as of 9/30/2104 C. Interim Academic Division Financial Report for 9/30/2104 D. AccessUVa Metrics Annual Report E. Executive Vice President’s Remarks 2 M EDICAL C ENTER A CQUISITION OF 500 R AY C. H UNT D RIVE PAT R I C K D . H O G A N E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R Medical Center Acquisition of 500 Ray C. Hunt Drive • Establish Fontaine as predominately clinical and research park. • Relocate clinical activities to provide better patient services: – Modern clinical space for Urology – Comprehensive clinical space for Cardiology • $12.0 - $14.0 million acquisition cost from Hospital Funds, reflects fair market value • $17.15 - $21.0 million total renovation cost from Hospital Funds 4 T REASURY R EPORT J A M E S M AT T E O A S S O C I AT E V I C E P R E S I D E N T & T R E A S U R E R Debt Portfolio Optimization Opportune time to consider changes to debt portfolio: • Historically low interest rate environment • Upcoming financing in early 2015 • Provides possible lever to fund University needs Optimization Considerations • Reduce liquidity risk • Diversify bank counterparties • Better aligning ST debt with ST assets • Lessen remarketing risk • Reduce interest expense, where possible 6 Potential Bond Financing Components Refinancing of Commercial Paper Estimated $200 million outstanding at time of refinancing Refunding of Series 2005 Bonds $36 million callable on June 1, 2015 Refunding of VCBA Series 2004B Bonds $18 million currently callable Restructuring of Series 2003A Bonds $78 million variable rate bonds outstanding supported by operating liquidity. Restructure to mitigate put risk and reduce reliance on operating liquidity. Series 2015 Bond Issue Size Up to $332 million of refunded debt 7 Considerations for Future Financings • Fixed rate debt vs. Variable rate debt: Fixed Rate Debt • • • Historically attractive long-term interest rates Higher cost of capital in the near-term Locks in low long-term rates Variable Rate Debt • • • Historically attractive short-term interest rates Creates near-term cash flow savings Results in better match between short-term assets and short-term liabilities • Appropriate mix of Fixed vs. Variable balances risk and cash opportunity through interest cost savings 8 Evaluating Interest Rate Environment • The University cannot predict future interest rates; however, we can evaluate historical market conditions to help project possible future trends Tax-exempt Yield Curve vs Historical Average * • Consideration should be given to historical interest rates and the predicted future rates as inherently shown in the future yield curve Maturity Year * Assumes market rates as of November 5, 2014 compared to historical average AAA tax-exempt rates since January 1, 1991 9 Debt Issuance Objectives • Attempt to take advantage of historically low long-term fixed rates with the next bond issue • Consider “averaging in” more variable rate debt over time • Target a medium-term goal of better matching ST assets and ST liabilities as a risk management tool. 10 Historical Debt Mix 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fixed Rate $853,065 $839,645 $1,015,847 $994,608 $1,065,064 $1,052,073 Synthetic Fixed 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Unhedged Variable 38,425 52,710 58,860 106,102 118,232 184,432 % Variable 4% 5% 5% 9% 9% 14% Total 991,490 992,355 1,174,707 1,200,710 1,283,296 1,336,505 Long-term WACC * 4.24% 4.24% 4.16% 4.16% 4.17% 4.17% * Long-term Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. Assumes all variable rate debt is hedged at fixed payer swap rate. Source: Wells Fargo. 11 Projected Debt Mix – Past Practice • • The University has historically refinanced its commercial paper with fixed rate bonds Over time, variable rate exposure has fluctuated as commercial paper is drawn and then permanently financed Long-term WACC * 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 4.17% 4.14% 4.14% 4.13% 4.30% * Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield. 12 Financing Option 1 – Accelerated Variable • • The University can issue long-term variable rate debt to refinance outstanding commercial paper In FY18, the University would issue $80 million in fixed rate bonds to achieve 20% unhedged long-term variable rate debt Long-term WACC * 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 4.17% 3.73% 3.74% 3.74% 3.69% * Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield. 13 Financing Option 2 – Balanced Approach • • The University can issue $120 million variable rate and $80 million fixed rate in FY 15 to refinance outstanding commercial paper In a rising interest rate environment, this approach results in a lower WACC and also mitigates risks associated with variable rate debt Long-term WACC * 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 4.17% 3.90% 3.90% 3.90% 3.62% * Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield. 14 Next Steps • At February 2015 meeting: – Seek BOV Authorizing Resolution for bond issue – Seek BOV Approval to Amend the University’s Debt Policy to address: • • • • • Remarketing Procedures Diversification of bank exposure Staggered expiration of credit facilities Staggered maturities of put-able debt Reintroduction of debt burden ratio (as required by the Commonwealth) • Consider Drafting a Liquidity Policy: – Formalizing liquidity targets would provide transparency and help ensure support from rating agencies and investors 15 E NDOWMENT R EPORT : M ARKET VALUE AND P ERFORMANCE AS OF J UNE 30, 2014 L AR RY K O C H AR D CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF UVIMCO Outline • Governance and Staffing • Performance Review • Asset Allocation • Risk Management • Going Forward 17 Governance and Staffing Board of Directors • 11 members led by David MacFarlane as Chair, three appointed by the BOV, and one by the President • BOV representatives are Mac Caputo, John Harris, and John Macfarlane • Meets four times a year Staff • 32 UVIMCO team members • Investment team comprised of CEO/CIO, three Managing Directors, three Associates, three Senior Analysts, and one Analyst • Average of 20 years of investment experience among senior staff 18 Performance Review As of June 30, 2014 Long Term Pool Policy Benchmark Equity Public Long / Short Buyout Venture Capital Total Equity MSCI All Country World Equity Real Assets Real Estate Resources Total Real Assets MSCI Real Estate Fixed Income, Cash & MAC Marketable Alternatives and Credit Government Bonds Cash & Currency Total Fixed Income, Cash & MAC Barclays Aggregate Bond Market Value $ Millions % 1 YR 3 YR Annualized 5 YR 10 YR 20 YR 6,950 100.0 100.0 19.0 16.6 12.4 8.9 15.2 12.4 10.8 7.5 12.6 7.6 1,530 1,611 996 384 4,521 22.0 23.2 14.3 5.5 65.1 60.0 26.8 11.3 28.3 61.8 23.3 23.6 15.9 11.7 15.1 30.2 15.0 10.9 22.9 10.7 19.8 29.4 17.9 14.9 14.4 9.8 14.3 12.6 12.6 8.0 12.9 10.2 -21.1 14.9 7.6 527 340 867 7.6 4.9 12.5 10.0 14.7 27.1 19.3 11.6 12.1 11.6 11.5 9.7 1.0 26.0 15.5 18.6 (1.2) 21.2 10.7 8.7 3.8 -11.8 8.6 761 605 195 1,561 10.9 8.7 2.8 22.4 30.0 14.6 0.4 0.1 7.4 4.8 11.1 0.3 (0.0) 5.3 4.1 12.9 1.5 0.1 7.4 4.7 7.4 4.6 -5.8 4.9 8.1 6.6 -7.3 6.2 19 Performance Review Annualized Returns of the Long Term Pool Versus Benchmarks and Peers Periods Ending June 30, 2014 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR 20 YR Long Term Pool 19.0 12.4 15.2 10.8 12.6 Policy Portfolio Benchmark 16.6 8.9 12.4 7.5 7.6 Comparative Industry Data TUCS All Master Trusts Top Quartile (1) TUCS All Master Trusts Median TUCS All Master Trusts Bottom Quartile 17.6 15.7 12.6 10.5 9.4 7.6 13.4 12.1 10.2 7.7 7.0 6.3 9.2 8.6 8.0 (1) Trust Universe Comparison Service (TUCS) reports performance of over 900 institutions representing $3.5 trillion in assets under management 20 Asset Allocation 100% 90% 22.0% 80% 60% Equity 70% 23.2% 60% 50% 40% 19.8% 30% 7.6% 10% Real Assets 4.9% 20% 10.9% 30% Fixed Income 10% 11.5% 0% 2001 2002 2003 Public Equity Real Estate Bonds & Cash 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Long/Short Equity Resources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Policy Portfolio Private Equity Marketable Alternatives & Credit As of June 30, 2014 21 Risk Management Risk is the likelihood of a random, undesirable outcome • For the University of Virginia, risk is the impact that a portfolio loss may have on the operations of the institution o Short term – volatility in payout from the endowment o Long term – decline in the real value of the endowment o Trade-off between short term and long term risk • We bear risks only if doing so generates higher long-term returns • Types of Risk: Market, Manager, and Liquidity • Risk Committee 22 Going Forward • Constantly reassess the current portfolio o Recent analyses include real estate, resources, and public equity o A deep dive into long/short equity scheduled for December • Manage risk and rebalance • Be opportunistic • Most important, understand our edge 23 S EPTEMBER 30, 2014 A CADEMIC D IVISION I NTERIM F INANCIAL R EPORT MELODY BIANCHETTO A S S O C I AT E V I C E P R E S I D E N T F O R F I N A N C E September 30, 2014 Academic Division Interim Financial Report • Unaudited, modified GAAP-basis Financial Statements Statement of Net Position, compared to 6/30/14 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position, compared to 9/30/13 • Cash-basis Comparative Statement of Operating Sources and Uses, actual results as compared to the budget plan through 9/30/14 25 Academic Division Interim Financial Report Highlights Modified GAAP-Basis Financial Statement (Unaudited, in millions) Statement of Net Position Net Assets Statement of Revenue, Expenses, Change in Net Position Net Tuition 9/30/14 6/30/14 $ 6,547.0 9/30/14 $ 6,336.9 9/30/13 $ 251.6 $ 237.4 86.8 85.1 135.7 137.1 Gifts 37.9 28.2 Other 76.9 63.3 Operating Revenues 588.9 551.1 Operating Expenses 374.3 354.1 Net Operating Margin 214.5 197.1 (4.4) 134.4 $ 210.1 $ 331.5 Grants & Contracts State Appropriations Net Non-Operating Activity Change in Net Assets 26 Academic Division Interim Financial Report Highlights Cash-Basis Operating Sources and Uses, Budget vs. Actual (in millions) 9/30/14 Budget Net Tuition and Fees Grants & Contracts $ 258.1 9/30/14 Actual $ 259.8 70.0 68.6 Endowment Distribution and Gifts 106.0 108.2 State Appropriations 142.6 135.7 Other 111.0 112.1 Sources of Funds 687.7 684.4 Instruction 76.0 75.4 Research and Public Service 90.0 90.3 Academic Support 48.0 48.3 Other Education and General 70.5 69.1 114.5 112.1 399.0 395.2 Financial Aid, Auxiliary, Debt, and Other Uses of Funds Net Sources in Excess of Uses $ 288.7 $ 289.2 27 A CCESS UVA M ETRICS A NNUAL R EPORT PAT R I C K D . H O G A N E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R AccessUVa Access “Need-blind” admission policy Affordability Commitment to meet 100% of students’ demonstrated financial need UVa is one of only two public universities with need-blind admissions and a guarantee to meet 100% of all students’ demonstrated financial need 29 Ensuring Access and Affordability through AccessUVa Goals: Attracting, enrolling, and graduating a socioeconomically diverse student body Ensuring financial support to students demonstrating financial need Preserving AccessUVa program’s position as one of the strongest commitments to guaranteed needbased aid in the country 30 PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WITH NEED 35% 33.3% AccessUVa Key Information 30% 25% 20% Since the inception of the AccessUVa program, the percentage of undergraduate students with financial need has grown from 24% to 33%. 23.7% 15% 10% 5% 0% Fall 2005 Fall 2007 Fall 2009 Fall 2011 Fall 2013 31 UVa First-Year Undergraduate Total Price of Attendance Academic Year 2014-15 In-State Tuition & Fees Orientation Fee Room Board Books, Travel, Other Total % students on aid: For students on aid: Average Grant Package Average Net Price Maximum Loan Offered Low-income: Others with Need: Out-of-State $12,998 210 5,492 4,560 4,157 $27,417 34% $10,587 $16,830 Tuition & Fees Orientation Fee Room Board Books, Travel, Other Total % students on aid For students on aid: Average Grant Package Average Net Price Maximum Loan Offered $42,184 210 5,492 4,560 5,390 $57,836 32% $27,659 $30,177 $7,000 $3,500 $7,000 32 AccessUVa Measures Pell grant recipients Need-based financial aid recipients Student indebtedness Graduation rates UVa has been successful in increasing socioeconomic diversity, maintaining top graduation rates, and meeting 100% of need while limiting student indebtedness. 33 Total Undergraduate Pell Grant Recipients Since the beginning of AccessUVa, the percentage of Pell Grant recipients among the total undergraduate population has almost doubled. 25% 20% In-State Total Out-of-State AccessUVa Fully Implemented AccessUVa Begins 15% 13.2% 10% 7.5% 5% 0% 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Fall Terms Source: Student Information System and financial aid applications. NCES College Navigator for peer data. 34 Undergraduate Student Indebtedness Average Total Student Debt upon Graduation (includes all education loans) $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $- Source: US News and World Report In line with national trends, UVa’s average undergraduate student indebtedness has risen from $15,176 to $22,933, an increase of 51%. This is due to increased cost of attendance, economic downturn, and funding pressures for financial aid. • UVa’s average total 2013-14 student debt ($22,933) is lower than the following 2011-12 averages (most recent data available): • • • State of Virginia Public four-year United States $25,017 $29,309 $29,400 • A reflection of UVa’s low net price and robust AccessUVa program, 35% of UVa students borrow, compared to the national average of 71% and the State of Virginia average of 60%. 35 Undergraduate Six-Year Graduation Rates 100% • UVa has the highest overall graduation rate of any public institution in the nation. 90% • UVa has the second highest graduation rate of Pell recipients among any public institution in the nation. 80% Students without Need 70% Students With Need but not Pell Pell Recipients 60% 50% 2000 Includes all 1st-time 1st-year students who entered in the given year. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Entering Fall Term Objective is to bring the Pell recipient graduation rate up to the level of students without need by: • providing robust student programming to guide incoming students’ transition to and persistence in the University, • monitoring academic performance, and • providing one-to-one support throughout their University career. Source: Institutional Assessment & Students and US News & World Report dataset 36 Looking Ahead AccessUVa continues to be the premier need-based aid program for a public institution in the United States, supporting the University’s efforts to increase socioeconomic diversity. Focused Effort: Bringing graduation rates of Pell recipients to the level of undergraduate students without need Moderating student indebtedness, mindful of the rising cost of attendance An important challenge going forward is meeting the increasing need of middle-income families through an appropriate balance of grants and loans. 37 The following five slides outline AccessUVa funding sources and provide a demographic breakdown of the undergraduate need-based financial aid recipients, as well as the institutional funds distributed to support their financial aid. 38 AccessUVa Key Information Sources of Funding Most notable areas of growth include tuition grants and loans. 39 Undergraduate Need-Based Financial Aid Recipients Fall 2014 All Undergraduate Students All Undergraduate Students Total Notes: Students with All Need Undergraduate (AccessUVa Students Recipients) 15,544 5,179 Minority Students $0 - 46,100 $46,101 - $92,200 >92,200 Did not Apply for Aid Subtotal 1,069 700 1,284 1,485 4,538 1,051 668 605 0 2,324 Other Students $0 - 46,100 $46,101 - $92,200 >92,200 Did not Apply for Aid Subtotal 798 823 3,222 6,163 11,006 750 759 1,346 0 2,855 33% of undergraduate student population 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines as of November 6, 2014. 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four. 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race. SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies 40 Undergraduate Need-Based Financial Aid Recipients Fall 2014 In-State Undergraduate Students In-State Undergraduate Students Total Minority Students Notes: $0 - 46,100 $46,101 - $92,200 >92,200 Did not Apply for Aid Subtotal Students with All Need Undergraduate (AccessUVa Students Recipients) 10,742 3,680 783 536 1,028 1,201 3,548 767 508 427 0 1,702 $0 - 46,100 632 592 $46,101 - $92,200 628 569 Other >92,200 2,292 817 Students Did not Apply for Aid 3,642 0 7,194 1,978 Subtotal 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines as of November 6, 2014. 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four. 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race. SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies 41 Undergraduate Need-Based Financial Aid Recipients Fall 2014 Out-of-State Undergraduate Students Out-of-State Undergraduate Students Students with All Need Undergraduate (AccessUVa Students Recipients) Total Minority Students Notes: $0 - 46,100 $46,101 - $92,200 >92,200 Did not Apply for Aid Subtotal 4,802 1,499 286 164 256 284 990 284 160 178 0 622 $0 - 46,100 166 158 $46,101 - $92,200 195 190 Other >92,200 930 529 Students Did not Apply for Aid 2,521 0 3,812 877 Subtotal 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines as of November 6, 2014. 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four. 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race. SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies 42 Undergraduate Need-Based Financial Aid Recipients and Institutional Funds, Fall 2013-14 and 2014-15 2013-2014 AccessUVa # Students, with federal need # Diverse Students, with federal need In-state - family income range: $0 - $46,100 1,355 754 In-state - family income range: $46,100 - $92,200 1,109 In-state - family income range: above $92,200 1,158 Total In-State 3,622 2014-2015 Institutional Funds # Diverse Students, with federal need Institutional Funds 9,009,931 1,359 767 513 5,817,453 1,077 508 6,720,086 391 1,075,992 1,244 427 1,385,509 1,658 $ # Students, with federal need 15,903,376 3,680 1,702 $ 8,776,797 16,882,392 Out-of-state - family income range: $0 - $46,100 441 266 15,745,217 442 284 15,042,740 Out-of-state - family income range: $46,100 - $92,200 326 149 7,949,898 350 160 9,162,273 Out-of-state - family income range: above $92,200 711 190 6,114,866 707 178 6,965,775 Total Out-of-State 1,478 605 29,809,981 1,499 622 31,170,788 Total In-State and Out-of-State 5,100 2,263 $ 45,713,357 5,179 2,324 $ 48,053,180 Notes: The schedule shows how only unrestricted dollars from tuition and unrestricted private funds are distributed through the AccessUVa program. In addition, roughly an additional $30M in grants funded from federal, state, external, and restricted gifts and endowment sources are distributed. From all sources, more than half of all grants are allocated to in-state students and half of all grants are allocated to out-of-state students each year. In-state tuition is used only for aid to in-state students, while out-ofstate tuition is used only for aid to out-of-state students. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines. The income ranges used above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four. Data as of 11/06/14. SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies 43 E XECUTIVE V ICE P RESIDENT ’ S R EMARKS PAT R I C K D . H O G A N E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R Executive Vice President’s Remarks • Merit Salary Increases 45 Results of Recent Merit-Based Compensation Adjustments October 2014 • Teaching & Research Faculty – Board-approved 4.75% merit pool • University Staff, Professional Research Staff and A&P Faculty – Boardapproved 3% merit pool • Classified Staff – 0%, not legislatively-authorized Faculty and Staff Merit-Based Salary Increases • Total investment $15.4 million – $7.3 million other sources (grants, contracts, auxiliary, etc.) – $8.1 million BOV-authorized funds 46 Results of Recent Merit-Based Compensation Adjustments October 2014 Employee Type Total # Eligible # Received Increase % Received Increase Average % Increase 2,293 1,679* 73% 4.5% Professional Research Staff 327 217 66% 2.6% Administrative + Professional Faculty 468 398 85% 3.1% 2,987 2,718 91% 2.9% 6,075 5,012 83% Teaching + Research Faculty University Staff TOTAL *Excludes SOM clinical faculty with the opportunity for compensation increases through UPG. Note: In 2013-14, UVa’s compensation ranking among AAU peer institutions was #27. The goal is to reach the 20th position. 47
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz