UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS MEETING OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 25, 2011 FINANCE COMMITTEE Friday, February 25, 2011 9:15 – 10:35 a.m. Board Room, The Rotunda Committee Members: Helen E. Dragas, Chair A. Macdonald Caputo Hunter E. Craig The Hon. Alan A. Diamonstein Marvin W. Gilliam Jr. Sheila C. Johnson Mark J. Kington Randal J. Kirk Vincent J. Mastracco Jr. John O. Wynne, Ex-officio Daniel M. Meyers, Consulting Member AGENDA PAGE I. II. CONSENT AGENDA (Mr. Sandridge) School of Medicine Quasi-Endowment Investments ACTION ITEMS (Mr. Sandridge) A. Enrollment Projections through 2018-2019 B. 2011-2012 Tuition and Fees for Special Programs 1. Darden Executive Master of Business Administration Program 2. Darden Global Executive Master of Business Administration Program 3. McIntire Executive Programs 4. School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Systems Engineering Accelerated Program 5. School of Continuing and Professional Studies Post-Baccalaureate Pre-Medicine Program 6. McIntire School of Commerce Undergraduate Tuition Differential C. Additions to the 2010-2011 Annual Renovation and Infrastructure Plan (Mr. Sandridge to introduce Ms. Colette Sheehy; Ms. Sheehy to report) 1. Aquatics and Fitness Center HVAC Upgrade 2. Renovation of the Camp Library at the Darden School 3. Medical Center Bone Marrow Inpatient Bed 4. Medical Center Pain Center Expansion 1 2 6 9 PAGE III. REPORTS BY THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER (Mr. Sandridge) A. Governor’s Budget, Budget Amendments Transmitted to the General Assembly, and 2011-2012 Academic Division Budget Planning and Preliminary Assumptions (Mr. Sandridge and Ms. Sheehy to report) B. Endowment Report – Market Value and Performance as of December 31, 2010 (Mr. Sandridge to introduce Mr. Larry Kochard; Mr. Kochard to report) C. Vice President’s Remarks D. Enterprise Risk Management Status Report E. Miscellaneous Financial Reports 1. Academic Division Accounts and Loans Receivable 2. Medical Center Financial Report 3. Internal Loans to University Departments and Activities 4. Capital Campaign 5. Endowment/Long-Term Investments for University of Virginia and Related Foundations 6. Quasi-Endowment Actions 7. Quarterly Budget 8. Sponsored Programs Restricted Grants and Contracts IV. APPENDIX A. Summary of Governor’s Budget Bill B. 2010-2012 Proposed Amendments V. EXECUTIVE SESSION Discussion of proprietary business-related information pertaining to operations of the Medical Center including a potential strategic joint venture or other competitive effort which impacts the long-range strategic goals of the Medical Center and Health System Decade Plan and where disclosure at this time would adversely affect the competitive position of the Medical Center, as provided for in Sections 2.2-3711 (A) (6) and (22) of the Code of Virginia. 10 16 26 27 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 40 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS CONSENT AGENDA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE QUASI-ENDOWMENT INVESTMENTS: Approves investments in two School of Medicine quasi-endowments. In June 1996, the Board of Visitors authorized the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer to approve individual quasi-endowment transactions, including establishments and divestments, that are less than $2 million. Individual quasi-endowment transactions of $2 million or more require the approval of the Board of Visitors. The School of Medicine received $20,998,759 in support of its academic mission from the UVa Medical Center. The School of Medicine wishes to transfer $18,000,000 of this contribution into its Fund for the Future Quasi-Endowment. The remaining portion of the gift will be held back to fund current commitments. The School of Medicine is the sole beneficiary of a bequest valued at approximately $4 million. The School recently received an advance of $2 million from this bequest and wishes to add this amount to its School of Medicine Quasi-Endowment. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by the Finance Committee and by the Board of Visitors APPROVAL OF INVESTMENTS TO THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE’S FUND FOR THE FUTURE AND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE QUASI-ENDOWMENT WHEREAS, the School of Medicine received $20,998,759 from the UVa Medical Center to support its academic mission and wishes to take $18 million of this money to invest in its Fund for the Future Quasi-Endowment account; and WHEREAS, the School bequest of approximately been advanced, and seeks Medicine Quasi-Endowment of Medicine is the beneficiary of a $4 million, of which $2 million has to invest this advance in its School of account; RESOLVED, the Board of Visitors authorizes the investment by the School of Medicine of $18 million and $2 million into its Fund for the Future and School of Medicine Quasi-Endowment accounts, respectively. 1 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: II.A. 2019 Enrollment Projections through 2018- BACKGROUND: The enrollment projections have been amended periodically by the Board of Visitors to accommodate enrollment changes and to assist the State Council of Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV) in overall enrollment planning for the state. The proposed enrollment projections are brought to the Board in the spring of odd-numbered years, to coincide with SCHEV submissions. In 1990, the Board of Visitors approved a phased enrollment growth plan for the next 15 years, culminating in projected onGrounds enrollment in 2004-2005 of 20,170: 12,685 undergraduate students, 5,185 graduate students, 1,700 first-professional students (law and medicine) and 600 on-Grounds continuing education students. In 2005, the Board of Visitors extended the enrollment projections to 2009-2010. During the study and planning for the restructuring legislation, when asked by SCHEV to predict maximum enrollment growth, the University determined it could accommodate 1,500 new students – 1,100 undergraduates and 400 graduate students – over the next ten years (to 2014). This projection was reaffirmed by the Board of Visitors in both 2007 and 2009. DISCUSSION: The proposed 2018-2019 enrollment projections increase undergraduate enrollment from today’s 14,015 students to 15,688 students in 2018-2019, an increase of 1,673 students - 1,400 attributable to new growth and 273 from the former plan. Graduate enrollment is projected to increase from 4,831 to 4,930 in the same period, an increase of approximately 100 students. Combined with 66 more first professional students and 39 fewer Continuing and Professional Studies students, the proposal results in a total on-Grounds enrollment of 22,848 in 2018-2019. At the end of five years (by 2015-2016), the University will have achieved a first-year enrollment level that will sustain our commitment to provide 1,400 new spaces for 2 undergraduates (and allow for an appropriate level of attrition). This growth creates 980 spaces for undergraduate Virginians provided we keep our current Virginian/non-Virginian ratio of 70 percent/30 percent, representing a 10 percent increase in Virginians from 2010 enrollment numbers. In addition, the University is currently operating under enrollment projections for 2010-11 to 2014-15 that add 191 in-state undergraduate students. The current planned growth plus new growth will add 1,171 total in-state undergraduate spaces, representing a 12 percent increase in in-state undergraduate students. In April, the University will submit for SCHEV’s consideration the proposed enrollment projections through 20182019. The Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and the Executive Vice President and Provost will meet with SCHEV leadership this spring to review the University’s submission and convey the Board’s position on these enrollment projections. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by the Finance Committee and the Board of Visitors APPROVAL OF REVISED ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS – THROUGH 2018-2019 WHEREAS, the University’s existing enrollment plan, approved by the Board of Visitors in April 2009, must be revised to reflect projected increases in the undergraduate and graduate enrollment levels; and WHEREAS, the Board of Visitors previously discussed and approved enrollment growth of 1,100 undergraduate students and 400 graduate students over a decade, from 2004-2014; and WHEREAS, the Board of Visitors supports the recommendations of the Governor’s Commission on Higher Education Reform, Innovation and Investment, one of which is to confer an additional 100,000 undergraduate degrees on Virginians over the next 15 years in order to make the Commonwealth one of the most highly educated states in the nation; and WHEREAS, the University is committed to serving the higher education needs of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the nation; and 3 WHEREAS, the revised enrollment projections for 2011-2012 through 2018-2019 are to be submitted to the State Council of Higher Education in Virginia by April 1, 2011; RESOLVED, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer is authorized to develop plans with the State Council of Higher Education in Virginia which will allow the University to increase enrollment by 1,500, to be comprised of 1,400 undergraduate students and 100 graduate students; and RESOLVED FURTHER, enrollment growth will occur only with appropriate state support as set forth in The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2011; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that all undergraduate student growth maintains the current 70 percent in-state/30 percent out-ofstate ratio. 4 University of Virginia Proposed Fall Census Headcount Enrollment Projections 1992 Actual Total Undergraduate 1st-Year New Transfers (full-time) 1993 Actual 1994 Actual 1995 Actual 1996 Actual 1997 Actual 1998 Actual 1999 Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Actual 2003 Actual 2004 Actual 2005 Actual 11,371 2,802 469 11,392 2,675 454 11,502 2,761 479 11,949 2,876 577 12,040 2,827 558 12,296 2,908 535 12,440 2,907 577 12,463 2,924 540 12,489 2,927 494 12,595 2,980 541 12,748 2,999 508 12,907 3,101 493 13,140 3,096 529 13,401 3,112 532 Graduate 4,565 4,633 4,505 4,403 4,220 4,155 4,110 3,998 4,160 4,301 4,459 4,616 4,632 4,699 1st-Professional 1,668 1,683 1,697 1,703 1,699 1,680 1,652 1,645 1,607 1,608 1,608 1,631 1,650 1,694 412 365 307 343 320 286 261 240 294 344 382 489 596 605 18,016 18,073 18,011 18,398 18,279 18,417 18,463 18,346 18,550 18,848 19,197 19,643 20,018 20,399 3,519 3,321 3,410 3,330 3,209 3,525 3,636 4,087 3,861 3,891 3,947 3,434 3,323 3,366 2011 Projected 2012 Projected 2013 Projected 2014 Projected 2015 Projected 2016 Projected 2017 Projected 2018 Projected Cont & Prof Studies (CPS) On Grounds Total Off-Grounds 5 2006 Actual Total Undergraduate 1st-Year New Transfers (full-time) 2007 Actual 2008 Actual 2009 Actual 2010 Actual 13,353 3,091 503 13,636 3,248 552 13,762 3,256 534 13,928 3,246 566 14,015 3,243 573 14,157 3,360 546 14,245 3,360 552 14,455 3,465 558 14,785 3,570 564 15,100 3,675 570 15,395 3,675 570 15,590 3,675 570 15,688 3,675 570 Graduate 4,791 4,830 4,904 4,835 4,831 4,830 4,845 4,860 4,875 4,890 4,905 4,920 4,930 1st-Professional 1,699 1,724 1,725 1,695 1,694 1,706 1,724 1,742 1,754 1,760 1,760 1,760 1,760 554 644 666 437 509 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 20,397 20,834 21,057 20,895 21,049 21,093 21,224 21,477 21,844 22,190 22,510 22,730 22,848 3,671 3,423 3,484 3,460 3,342 3,450 3,475 3,500 3,525 3,550 3,525 3,550 3,575 Cont & Prof Studies (CPS) On Grounds Total Off-Grounds Institutional Assessment and Studies February 21, 2011 REVISED PAGE Notes: The 1st-Year and New Transfer counts are also included in the Undergraduate totals. Beginning in 2011, BIS students in Tidewater, Richmond, and Northern Virginia are included in Off-Grounds. No CPS students are included in the Undergraduate or Graduate totals. CPS enrollments include Post-Baccalaureate-Pre-M ed students. Off-Grounds enrollments include Semester at Sea students and FBI Academy students.. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: II.B. 2011-2012 Tuition and Fees for Special Programs BACKGROUND: The University currently has four programs whose academic year begins in May or June rather than in August. The University will be introducing a fifth such program in 20112012. For that reason, the Finance Committee considers their tuition proposals each year at this meeting. Additionally, the University proposes a differential tuition rate for third-year undergraduate students enrolled in the McIntire School of Commerce. DISCUSSION: After analyzing competitive trends among peer programs, market intelligence on price as a driver of applicant behavior, and instructional delivery costs, the University recommends that tuition and fees for the Darden School’s MBA for Executives program increase by 3.5 percent for both Virginians and non-Virginians to $119,500 for the 22-month program. The Darden School is launching a new Global MBA for Executives program in 2011-2012. Based on an analysis of market pricing for peer programs and forecasted instructional delivery costs, the University recommends that tuition and fees for this program be established at $139,500 for both Virginians and nonVirginians for the 21-month program. This price does not include travel to and from education sites, which is the student’s responsibility. The charge for the McIntire School of Commerce’s Executive MS in Management of Information Technology (MIT) is recommended at $39,655, amounting to an increase of $1,155 (three percent) for both Virginians and non-Virginians. The recommended tuition charge for the School of Engineering and Applied Science’s Accelerated Master’s Program in Systems Engineering is $36,500. This represents an increase of $1,500 (4.3 percent) for both Virginians and non-Virginians. Tuition and fees for the School of Continuing and Professional Studies’ Post-Baccalaureate Pre-Medical Certificate 6 Program are proposed to increase by $1,300 for Virginians (5.5 percent) and non-Virginians (4.5 percent) to address increasing program costs and to price the program more competitively. The University proposes a differential tuition rate for third-year undergraduate students beginning in the McIntire School of Commerce. The proposal takes into account the additional costs McIntire incurs to provide value-added career services and technology support to students over and above those available from core University services and the need to increase faculty salaries to close the gap between McIntire salaries and the Association of American Universities 60th percentile salaries to retain the best teachers and researchers. The University recommends a $3,000 tuition differential be assessed to Virginian and non-Virginian third-year McIntire students in 2011-2012. The differential is expected to be in addition to the Board of Visitors-approved increase in base undergraduate tuition for 2011-2012. The differential program will be assessed further and brought back before the Board of Visitors for consideration and approval before it continues beyond 20112012. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by the Finance Committee and by the Board of Visitors 7 APPROVAL OF 2011-2012 TUITION AND FEES FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS RESOLVED, the Board of Visitors approves the tuition and fees applicable to the following programs as shown below, effective May 1, 2011, unless otherwise noted: MBA for Execs Virginian Amount Percent 2010-11 of of 2011-12 Approved Increase Increase Proposed Non-Virginian Amount Percent 2010-11 of of Approved Increase Increase $115,500 $115,500 $ 4,000 3.5% $119,500 $ 4,000 2011-12 Proposed 3.5% $ 119,500 The price is all inclusive for the 22 months of the full program and includes estimated 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 special session mandatory fee, books, materials, computer leasing, software licenses, group meals, and lodging. Global MBA for Execs The price 2012-2013 licenses, education n/a n/a n/a $139,500 n/a n/a n/a $139,500 is for the 21 months of the full program and includes estimated 2011-2012 and special session mandatory fee, books, materials, computer leasing, software group meals, and lodging. The price excludes transportation to and from sites. MIT $ 38,500 $ 1,155 3.0% $ 39,655 $ 38,500 $ 1,155 3.0% $ 39,655 The price includes the estimated 2011-2012 special session mandatory fee, books, materials, software licenses, group meals, and lodging. MIT Optional Indep. Study $1,283/ cr. hr $39 Systems Eng. $ 35,000 $1,500 3.0% $1,322/ cr. hr $1,283/ cr. hr $39 3.0% $1,322/ cr. hr 4.3% $ 36,500 $ 35,000 $1,500 4.3% $ 36,500 The price includes the estimated 2011-2012 special session mandatory fee, books, materials, technology, group meals, and lodging. Post-Bac, Pre- $ 23,700 Med $1,300 5.5% $ 25,000 $ 28,700 $1,300 4.5% $ 30,000 The price includes the estimated 2011-2012 full-time mandatory fee. McIntire School of Commerce Undergraduate Tuition Differential Third-years n/a n/a n/a $3,000 n/a n/a Fourth-years n/a n/a n/a $0 n/a n/a 8 n/a n/a $3,000 $0 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: II.C. Additions to the 2010-2011 Annual Renovation and Infrastructure Plan BACKGROUND: Under Restructuring, the Board of Visitors has been delegated the authority to approve all capital projects (acquisitions, capital leases, or new construction or renovation projects costing more than $1 million and impacting more than 5,000 gross square feet) funded with non-general funds. To facilitate the consideration of certain projects, the Board of Visitors considers the Annual Renovation and Infrastructure Projects (ARIP) Plan in conjunction with the annual budget summary each June. The ARIP consists of a detailed list of renovation and infrastructure projects expected to cost between $1 million and $5 million, to be funded with non-general fund cash (no debt) and expected to be initiated within the next fiscal year. DISCUSSION: There are four ARIP-eligible projects which will begin prior to June 1, 2011 and require Finance Committee approval. These projects are: 1. $1.75 - $2.12 million replacement of the HVAC system at the Aquatic and Fitness Center 2. $1.36 - $1.65 million renovation of the Camp Library at the Darden School to create office space on the second floor of the Library 3. $1.18 - $1.61 million renovation of the Medical Center Bone Marrow Inpatient Bed Unit 4. $1.25 - $1.51 million renovation of the Medical Center Pain Center Expansion APPROVAL OF ADDITIONS TO THE 2010-2011 ANNUAL RENOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN RESOLVED, the Board of Visitors approves the addition of four projects to the 2010-2011 Annual Renovation and Infrastructure Plan: an HVAC upgrade at the Aquatic and Fitness Center and renovations of the Camp Library at the Darden School, the Medical Center’s Bone Marrow Inpatient Bed Unit, and the Medical Center’s Pain Center. 9 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: III.A. Governor’s Budget, Budget Amendments Transmitted to the General Assembly, and 2011-2012 Academic Division Budget Planning and Preliminary Assumptions ACTION REQUIRED: None Governor’s Budget BACKGROUND: On December 17th, Governor McDonnell presented to the Legislature his amendments to the 2010-2012 biennial budget. The General Assembly will consider the Governor’s amendments to the Budget Bill during its short session, which began January 12th. The House of Delegates and Senate versions of the Budget Bill crossed over on Tuesday, February 8th, and the Joint Conference Committee is slated to present its reconciled budget on Thursday, February 24th. At the February 25th Finance Committee meeting, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and the Vice President for Management and Budget will review the status of the General Assembly activity, particularly any new developments which may have occurred after the distribution of these materials. DISCUSSION: Governor McDonnell's operating budget proposes a new Higher Education Innovation and Performance fund of $50 million in order to support student enrollment, retention, and graduation; undergraduate financial aid; on-line course availability; and academic transformation through technology. This fund is to be distributed by the Secretary of Education in response to proposals submitted by higher education institutions. The Governor also has created a $25 million fund to support research and the commercialization of technology. The Governor’s budget incorporates the prior changes approved by the 2010 General Assembly, including a $196.8 million reduction in base fiscal year 2012 support distributed to higher education institutions and a $10 million reduction held in central accounts pending distribution. The Governor has developed a proposal that will require all employees enrolled in the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) 10 defined benefit plan to contribute five percent of their base salary towards their retirement; this will be offset partially by a three percent increase in base salary. Employees enrolled in the University’s Optional Retirement Plan (ORP) will see the contributions to their defined contribution plan decrease from 10.4 percent to 8.5 percent. Finally, the Governor has included a provision for a two percent faculty and staff bonus on December 1, 2011, if June 30, 2011 state balances are at least twice the cost of the bonus. Governor McDonnell has allocated funds for maintenance reserve - $5 million for UVa – in 2011-2012. Just as the 20102011 maintenance reserve funding and Equipment Trust Fund are not yet distributed due to state debt capacity issues, this funding will rely on the state’s ability to issue debt. Specific actions can be found in Appendix A. Budget Amendments Transmitted to General Assembly BACKGROUND: Each January, the University may propose operating and capital budget amendments to the General Assembly. DISCUSSION: The action taken by the Board of Visitors in September 2010 to approve the budget amendment requests to the Governor permitted the resubmission of requests not addressed by the Budget Bill to the General Assembly for its consideration. On January 14th, the Academic Division resubmitted two amendments, the Medical Center resubmitted one amendment, and the College at Wise resubmitted one amendment – all previously approved by the Board of Visitors – to the General Assembly for consideration. Specific actions can be found in Appendix B. 2011-2012 Academic Division Budget Planning and Preliminary Assumptions BACKGROUND: Each year at this time, the University begins formulating the Academic Division budget for the subsequent fiscal year, including the establishment of preliminary budget assumptions. The Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and the Vice President for Management and Budget will review the status of several key components to the 2011-2012 operating budget: 1) initiatives which the Board of Visitors has previously considered and approved; 2) unavoidable and nondiscretionary expenditures to which the University is already committed; 3) other areas of critical need which the Board of 11 Visitors may wish to consider for investment in 2011-2012; and 4) certain assumptions about the availability of various revenue streams to the extent they are known at this time. DISCUSSION: The following budget planning items and assumptions will be used in the development of the 2011-2012 budget, to be presented to the Board of Visitors for action at its June 2011 meeting: Operating Budget Assumptions Initiatives which the Board has previously considered and approved: Full funding will be provided for the projected cost of AccessUVa. The supplement from unrestricted institutional resources (i.e., need not met from federal aid programs, state general funds, or restricted private funds) is approximately 16 percent of gross undergraduate tuition revenue in 20102011. We expect the 2011-2012 contribution to be a similar proportion of undergraduate tuition. Full funding will be provided for the incremental cost of operations and maintenance for newly-constructed or renovated buildings. In the absence of state support, the primary funding source for educational and general (E&G) buildings (e.g., the ITC Data Center, Rice Hall, College of Arts & Sciences Research Building, Rehearsal Hall, Garrett Hall, Thrust Theater) is tuition. A seventh $1.5 million installment (of ten) will be allocated to increase maintenance funding and reduce the deferred maintenance backlog for E&G facilities. Funds will be provided to the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences for three new faculty to match the commitment of the Commonwealth in the Rolls-Royce Partnership. Full funding will be provided for the incremental cost of the employer share of the UVa Health Plan. The implementation of the third year recommendations of the Commission on the Future of the University will be incorporated in the budget. 12 The Darden School and Law School financial self-sufficiency models will continue in 2011-2012. In the future it is anticipated that these agreements with the schools will be superseded with the implementation of a new Academic Division resource allocation model. Self-supporting units will comply with the Board of Visitors Capital and Operating Reserves Policy established in April 2006. Unavoidable and non-discretionary items to which the University has already committed: Funding will be provided for unavoidable cost increases in utilities (estimated at a 3 percent increase) and other services (e.g., E-911 and fire services and rent escalations). Funding will be provided for prior commitments to newly hired or re-appointed deans in the College of Arts & Sciences; the School of Architecture; and the School of Engineering and Applied Science and to the Director of the Center for Politics. State authorized changes, as approved by the 2011 General Assembly, to faculty and staff compensation, whether permanent changes to base salary, one-time bonuses, or benefits, will be funded. There are other critical areas on which the Board of Visitors may want to provide guidance in the development of the 2011-2012 operating budget: There will be incremental costs associated with the enrollment growth proposal to be considered by the Board of Visitors at its February meeting. Costs to be considered include: AccessUVa; new faculty to maintain existing faculty-student ratios; start-up packages for new science and engineering faculty in the College of Arts & Sciences and the School of Engineering; and other support costs (e.g., academic support, library, technology, admissions, student affairs, student financial services, etc.) The Board may consider faculty and University staff salary actions to supplement any actions by the state. University employees last received base salary increases in November 2007 and recruitment, retention, and morale are being negatively 13 impacted. [State classified employee salaries may only be increased if authorized by the state.] New initiatives may arise from the Governor’s Commission on Higher Education Reform, Innovation and Investment. Assumptions Related to Funding Sources 1. In 2010-2011, tuition and fees are budgeted to fund 31 percent of the Academic Division operating budget. Tuition and fee charges for 2011-2012 will reflect rates that will be approved by the Board of Visitors at its April 2011 meeting after consideration of actions taken by the 2011 General Assembly. 2. In 2010-2011, reimbursements for direct and indirect costs related to externally sponsored research (primarily federally funded) is budgeted to fund 24 percent of the Academic Division operating budget. The 2011-2012 projection will be based on historical spending patterns, sponsored program awards, and expected indirect cost recoveries. The University will consider the decreasing impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) on 2011-2012 sponsored research. 3. In 2010-2011, activity related to auxiliaries (self-supporting entities that exist to provide services to students, faculty, and staff, such as Housing, Bookstores, Athletics) will make up approximately 14 percent of the Academic Division operating budget. For 2011-2012, projections of activity will be based upon services to be provided, including fees which will be considered by the Board of Visitors (housing, dining and mandatory student fees) in April. 4. In 2010-2011, funds from annual giving and other activities are expected to provide 11 percent of the Academic Division operating budget; $23 million of this funding source is allocated to the University through the Commonwealth as State Financial Stabilization Funds (SFSF) from the ARRA. For 20112012, annual giving will be projected based upon estimates from University Development and school officials. We will not include any funding from the ARRA’s SFSF program in 2011-2012. 5. In 2010-2011, the state appropriation is budgeted to fund 10 percent of the Academic Division operating budget. The 20112012 state appropriation will reflect budget changes as approved by the Governor and the 2011 General Assembly, including the $14.7 million budget reduction approved in the 14 2010 General Assembly. Beginning state budget targets issued to major budget units (MBUs) reflect a 2.5 – 3.0 percent decrease from 2010-2011, recovering approximately $9.0 million of the budget reduction. Since October 2007, the University has incurred budget reductions, which total an annual amount of $51.5 million. To offset these reductions, MBUs have seen a 14-15 percent reduction in their state budget targets. 6. In 2010-2011, distributions from the endowment are expected to fund 10 percent of the Academic Division operating budget. For 2011-2012, projected contributions from the endowment will be budgeted based upon the University’s approved endowment spending policy. 15 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: III.B. Endowment Report – Market Value and Performance as of December 31, 2010 ACTION REQUIRED: None BACKGROUND: The University of Virginia Investment Management Company (UVIMCO) provides investment management to the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia and its related Foundations. Assets deposited in UVIMCO are held in the custody and control of UVIMCO on behalf of the University and Foundations within a long-term, co-mingled investment pool. DISCUSSION: The December 31, 2010 Report is included below. Quarter-End December 2010 PERFORMANCE The Long Term Pool returned 16.0 percent in 2010, beating the policy benchmark return of 12.4 percent during the year. While we prefer to focus on long-term returns, we recognize that there have been and will continue to be short periods – typically during strong markets – where we trail our policy benchmark. For example, the Pool’s absolute return in 2009 was an attractive 18.8 percent, but we trailed our policy benchmark return by 730 bps. The last six months of 2010 (the first six months of fiscal year 2011) represented another period of rapidly increasing stock prices. The Long Term Pool returned a healthy 12.6 percent during the six months ending December 31, 2010, but trailed the policy benchmark return of 17.2 percent over the same time period. An overweight to emerging markets and active stock selection by our public equity managers provided a boost to the Long Term Pool’s performance in 2010. Sizable gains in our growing resources program were an additional contributor to the total portfolio return. The year was characterized by a continued outperformance of risky assets: low quality over high quality, small caps over large caps, and emerging markets over developed markets. However, our long/short equity tilt toward 16 large cap quality caused the program to generate slim returns, which was a drag on the Long Term Pool’s total performance. Negative private real estate returns also hurt both absolute and relative performance as the public real estate portion of our policy benchmark had a strong year. UVIMCO’s investment strategy involves making commitments to investment managers and themes that pay off over a number of years. Therefore, we focus more attention on long-term returns than on short-term. The past decade saw two sizable stock market downturns and a real estate collapse. It was a tough decade to produce returns. Despite the challenging environment, the Long Term Pool earned an annualized 7.9 percent return over the last ten years, exceeding the policy benchmark of 5.1 percent. The Pool’s ten-year returns were aided by a long-term overweight to emerging markets. In addition, the same long/short portfolio that caused a drag on short-term performance in 2010 provided a significant contribution to the Pool’s ten-year returns. The Pool’s relatively large allocation to long/short equity managers helped cushion the blow from the equity sell-off in 2001 and 2002 as our managers took advantage of attractive shorting opportunities. The difficult decade of 2001–2010 was preceded by the bull market of the 1990s. The Long Term Pool achieved attractive absolute and relative returns during this time period as well. Over the 20-year period ending December 31, 2010, the Pool’s annualized return was 12.6 percent, exceeding the policy benchmark return by 450 bps. Public Equity During 2010, our public equity portfolio returned 22.3 percent versus a return of 13.2 percent on global equities as measured by the MSCI All Country World index (ACWI). Over the past ten years, our public equity portfolio returned 10.1 percent versus 3.7 percent on global equities. The strong performance – for the year and for the decade – was helped by a long-standing bias toward the emerging markets in our portfolio. The MSCI Emerging Market Index returned 19.2 percent and 16.2 percent per year over the last one and ten years, respectively. Over the past five years, an emphasis on consumer-oriented stocks also provided a boost to performance. The degree of outperformance, especially over the past year, cannot be fully explained by these factors. We attribute a good portion of the results to the strong stock selection skills of our managers. We expect there will be periods in which both the stock picks of 17 our managers and the biases within the portfolio do not line up as favorably, and we will need to borrow from those periods of outperformance. Long/Short Equity Long/short equity returns were an anemic 6.3 percent during 2010, compared to 13.2 percent on the MSCI ACWI and 9.3 percent on the Dow Jones Credit Suisse Long/Short Equity Index. We have been here before. In 2003 our portfolio returned 11.4 percent, the market was up 34.6 percent, and the long/short index was up 17.3 percent; in 2006, our portfolio returned 12.0 percent, the market was up 21.5 percent, and the long/short index was up 14.4 percent. UVIMCO’s long/short portfolio has a quality and large cap bias. In 2003, 2006 and 2010, high quality equities underperformed low quality, and large companies underperformed small. In each instance, subsequent outperformance rewarded our patience. We believe that recent equity price movements have been influenced more by macroeconomic news than changes in the underlying company fundamentals. The market has not differentiated between the valuation of stocks with different growth prospects. We expect to be rewarded as the market recognizes fundamental differences, but we continue to assess the risks to this thesis. Over the past ten years, the long/short equity portfolio returned 8.3 percent versus 3.7 percent on global equities and 6.4 percent on the long/short index. Private Equity The private equity portion of the Long Term Pool includes buyout and venture investments. In 2010, the private equity portfolio returned 23.6 percent, with the buyout portfolio returning 23.5 percent and the venture capital portfolio returning 24.1 percent. The one-year returns compare quite favorably to the 13.2 percent return for the MSCI ACWI. Fiscal year to date, the private equity portfolio lagged the public markets, returning 12.4 percent versus the 24.6 percent for the MSCI ACWI over the six months ending December 31, 2010. As noted in past reports, returns on the private equity portfolio typically lag the public markets during rapidly increasing markets, as returns are based on the values reported on the most recent manager statements (in many cases, it is September as of this report). For the ten-year period, the private equity portfolio, as a whole, had a return of 3.1 percent versus 3.7 18 percent for the MSCI ACWI. The buyout portfolio generated an annual return of 10.6 percent while the venture capital portfolio lost 9.3 percent per year, on average, over the decade. Liquidity in the Long Term Pool was enhanced by an increase in distributions from our private equity managers during 2010. Distributions from our buyout and venture managers increased from $26.9 million in 2009 to $168.9 million in 2010. Resources UVIMCO’s resources portfolio generated extraordinary returns in 2010. The strategy returned 78.2 percent for the 12 months ending December 31, compared to nine percent for the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index and 16.8 percent for the Dow Jones UBS Commodity Index. The performance also exceeded energy focused public equities, as the S&P 500 Energy Index and the Morgan Stanley All Country World Energy Index appreciated 20.5 percent and 9.2 percent, respectively. Our allocation to resources grew during the year from 5.6 percent to 7.8 percent. Our resources portfolio remains weighted towards domestic oil and gas investments. The tailwind from commodity markets fueled strong returns across our portfolio of managers. However, several large and highly successful exits boosted our returns even beyond most broad energy indexes. Of particular note were investments in early stage upstream oil and gas companies, both through our managers and directly through co-investments, which capitalized on opportunities in oil and gas shales. Strong drilling and operating execution at the company level combined with an acceleration of public and private capital flows into the space helped create a supportive market for these assets. Additionally, our private mining investments benefited from rising mineral prices and related concerns about supply constraints over the next few years. While we are certainly pleased with these results, we are also reminded that past returns do not necessarily predict future success. The resources portfolio remains a focus area for UVIMCO given the current market environment and global macroeconomic backdrop. However, we are also cognizant that simply re-investing gains at higher asset prices may not be a prudent course of action. As with all strategies in which we invest, we remain committed to only allocating capital where a manager can purchase assets below their long-run intrinsic value while 19 implementing sensible business plans to create additional value going forward. Real Estate The private real estate portfolio fell by 21.9 percent during 2010, almost exclusively as a result of write-downs taken by managers in the first half of the year. This significantly trailed public market comparables as the Morgan Stanley Real Estate Index returned 23.7 percent. The return also underperformed broad private market proxies such as the NCREIF Property Index, which rose 13.1 percent during the year. 2010 was a positive year for broad real estate markets, bringing a sharp increase in transaction activity and improving fundamentals across property sectors. These developments, along with low interest rates and a dearth of other sources of yield, created a favorable environment for publicly traded REITs such that those in our public benchmark. Conversely, UVIMCO’s private real estate managers revalue their portfolios on a periodic basis using a conservative methodology. Therefore, we are not surprised that our managers’ pricing of UVIMCO’s real estate portfolio lags public market valuations by a wide margin. Furthermore, our U.S. focused portfolio did not participate in the strong gains realized by Asian real estate during 2010. Our under-allocation to Asia remains an important difference between our real estate portfolio and the policy benchmark. UVIMCO’s real estate assets purchased before the financial crisis have underperformed the broader real estate market, especially those involving business plans reliant on ground-up development and the for-sale housing market. However, nearly 40 percent of the current NAV of our real estate portfolio was invested by our managers during 2010 and is essentially being held at cost. We invested significant new capital into the portfolio during the year, with our allocation to real estate increasing from four percent of the Pool at the end of 2009 to five percent at the end of 2010. Importantly, over 50 percent of our real estate portfolio consists of investments were made after the 2008 financial crisis. Such acquisitions typically involve existing assets located in urban markets with in-place cash flow. We expect our real estate allocation to rise in coming years as our managers put capital to work in this more attractive environment. 20 Absolute Return During calendar year 2010, the absolute return portfolio returned 10.9 percent, versus a 12.4 percent return for the policy portfolio benchmark. Returns across the three managers were split, with low single digit returns from our fixed income arbitrage manager being offset by strong returns from our emerging markets macro manager and multi-asset class manager. The latter manager continued to benefit from their credit portfolio and strong rebound in those markets. Over the past decade, the absolute return portfolio returned 7.3 percent versus 5.1 percent on the policy portfolio benchmark. Credit The Credit portfolio returned 13.2 percent during 2010 versus 15.1 percent on the Barclays High Yield Index. Returns across managers were mixed, with very strong returns from opportunistic managers and managers focused on loans and residential mortgages offset by relatively poor results from two managers taking an opportunistic approach towards private opportunities. We are disappointed with the overall results within our credit portfolio over the medium-term. We made missteps in timing our investments, particularly in mortgages. Over the past decade, the Credit portfolio returned 9.9 percent versus 8.9 percent on high yield bonds. Bonds and Cash Our government bond portfolio is primarily a source of liquidity, and low yields on longer duration bonds and a concern for rising interest rates have caused us to hold the entire portfolio in short-term, high quality securities. Returns of 11 bps on these short-term cash investments are consistent with an environment in which current interest rates are near zero percent. ASSET ALLOCATION Our policy portfolio continues to be an allocation of 60 percent to equity, ten percent to real assets and 30 percent to fixed income. Hence, the policy portfolio benchmark is the return on a portfolio that is 60 percent global public equity plus ten percent global public real estate plus 30 percent global investment grade fixed income. 21 This portfolio is designed to provide long-term growth from equities, an inflation hedge from real assets and deflation hedge from fixed income. The Long Term Pool’s actual allocation is 64.2 percent to equity managers, 12.9 percent to real asset managers and 22.9 percent to fixed income (including credit), cash and absolute return managers. Looking through our managers’ funds to the underlying investments, the Long Term Pool has a 52.8 percent allocation to equities, 15.0 percent allocation to real assets and 32.2 percent allocation to fixed income (including credit) and cash. LIQUIDITY We need sufficient liquidity within the Long Term Pool to achieve the following: 1. Meet redemptions and payouts for the university and foundations, 2. Fund capital calls for our private managers when they make investments, 3. Rebalance the portfolio, and 4. Fund opportunistic investment opportunities that occur during infrequent market dislocations. We continue to hold adequate liquidity within the Long Term Pool to meet these liquidity needs. Cash and government bonds have remained fairly consistent during the past year, from $490.6 million at the end of 2009 to $458.8 million at the end of 2010. In addition, the percentage of the endowment that can be turned into cash within one quarter has increased from 24.3 percent to 26.3 percent of the Long Term Pool. Unfunded private investment commitments have decreased from $1.3 billion or 29.2 percent of the Long Term Pool at the end of 2009 to $1.0 billion or 20.5 percent of the Long Term Pool at the end of 2010. 22 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Investment Report December 31, 2010 Investment Activity Beginning Net Asset Value (NAV) Month FYTD 2011 (1) $4,810,320,966.92 $4,454,689,896.34 947,656.61 $5,076.02 $1,294,012.15 ($4,933,311.26) $109,460,126.13 ($801,720.16) Beginning Shares NAV Per Share at Beginning of Period + Contributions - Redemptions + Investment Return - Fees Ending Net Asset Value (NAV) Ending Shares NAV Per Share at End of Period 965,976.04 $4,611.59 $14,152,354.19 ($102,862,256.49) $557,402,360.56 ($8,042,280.82) $4,915,340,073.78 946,801.17 $5,191.52 $4,915,340,073.78 946,801.17 $5,191.52 Long Term Pool % of NAV Shareholder Summary $3,036,541,213.94 $1,071,671,578.41 $807,127,281.43 $4,915,340,073.78 University of Virginia Endowment Affiliated Organizations University Operating Funds Total 61.8% 21.8% 16.4% 100.0% Performance Market Value (2) $ Millions % Long Term Pool Policy Benchmark Equity Public Long / Short Buyout Venture Capital 4,915 Total Real Assets Barclays Aggregate Bond (5) 20 YR 12.6 16.0 (0.0) 7.4 7.9 12.6 100.0 4.7 17.2 12.4 (0.3) 4.8 5.1 8.1 1,120 1,144 776 117 22.8 23.3 15.8 2.4 4.8 2.5 2.2 (0.1) 24.4 10.4 12.7 10.7 22.3 6.3 23.5 24.1 (2.0) (2.0) (1.3) (4.7) 8.2 6.7 9.7 2.8 10.1 8.3 10.6 (9.3) 12.7 --17.5 3,157 64.2 60.0 3.1 7.4 15.6 24.6 16.4 13.2 (1.1) (3.8) 8.1 4.0 7.8 3.7 14.8 7.8 247 384 5.0 7.8 (0.0) 1.3 0.6 26.0 (21.9) 78.2 (28.7) 18.4 (16.0) 19.3 (5.2) 24.8 --- 632 12.9 0.8 15.6 30.4 (5.2) 2.2 9.7 -- 10.0 5.6 24.3 23.7 (4.1) 1.9 7.8 10.1 1.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 6.3 6.1 0.2 0.1 10.9 13.2 0.1 0.1 9.0 3.5 6.6 0.8 8.8 5.7 6.5 -- 7.3 9.9 --- ----- 0.7 4.0 9.1 6.5 7.5 7.5 8.3 (0.8) 0.9 5.6 5.5 5.3 5.5 6.8 502 280 459 (114) Total Fixed Income, Cash & AR Annualized 5 YR 10 YR 2.3 (4) MSCI Real Estate Fixed Income, Cash & AR Absolute Return Credit Cash & Currency Short-Term Borrowing 3 YR 100.0 (3) Total Equity MSCI All Country World Equity Real Assets Real Estate Resources Time-Weighted Returns MO FYTD 1 YR 1,127 10.2 5.7 9.3 (2.3) 22.9 30.0 23 Investment Report December 31, 2010 Short-Term Liquidity(6) Actual Liquidity (Cumulative Total % of NAV) Weekly 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 2% 4% 10% 12% 16% 17% 17% Long / Short Equity - - 4% 5% 15% 18% 21% Absolute Return - - 2% 3% 7% 8% 10% 9% 9% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 11% 13% 26% 29% 48% 53% 58% 549 652 1,291 1,428 2,376 2,610 2,833 Public Equity Cash Total Available Liquidity ($ in Millions) Monthly Quarterly Semi-Annually Private Funds Market Values and Commitments (7) ($ in Millions) Market Value of Private Investments Amount % of NAV Uncalled Commitment Amount % of NAV Private Aggregate Amount % of NAV Public Equity 92 2% 6 0% 99 Long / Short Equity 26 1% - - 26 1% Private Equity 893 18% 419 9% 1,312 27% Real Estate 247 5% 337 7% 585 12% Resources 384 8% 150 3% 534 11% 20 0% - - 20 0% 279 6% 97 2% 376 8% 1,942 40% 1,009 21% 2,952 60% North America Europe Asia LAMA(9) Absolute Return Credit Total 2% Market and Currency Exposure Estimates (8) (% of NAV) Equity Policy Ranges Actual Exposure 40 - 70 52.8 31.5 6.9 8.6 5.8 Real Assets 5 - 20 15.0 12.9 0.8 0.9 0.4 Credit 0 - 20 5.9 5.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 Government Bonds 5 - 20 - - - - - Total Market Exposure 70 - 100 73.7 49.7 7.8 9.8 6.5 0 - 20 Policy Ranges 25 - 75 10 - 40 10 - 40 0 - 30 26.3 26.6 (0.4) (0.0) Currency Exposure -- 100.0 76.3 7.4 9.8 6.5 Policy Ranges -- -- 50 - 100 0 - 30 0 - 30 0 - 20 -- 74.0 Cash & Currency Market Beta Exposure (10) -- -- 24 -- -- -- 0.0 -- Investment Report December 31, 2010 Endnotes (1) UVIMCO's fiscal year runs from July 1 through June 30. (2) All investments are recorded at estimated fair market value in accordance with UVIMCO's valuation policy. (3) The Policy Benchmark is the geometrically linked monthly average of the underlying asset classes' benchmarks, weighted by the Fiscal Year 2011 policy target allocations: 60% Equity, 10% Real Assets, 30% Fixed Income. (4) The Real Estate component of our Fiscal Year 2011 policy portfolio is comprised of 50% MSCI U.S. Real Estate Index and 50% MSCI All Country World Real Estate Index. Prior to January 1995, the benchmark is comprised of 100% FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index. (5) The Fixed Income component of our Fiscal Year 2011 policy portfolio is comprised of 50% Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and 50% Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index (Hedged in U.S. Dollars). Prior to January 1990, the benchmark is comprised of 100% Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. (6) Represents securities and funds that may be readily sold for cash within the designated time periods. (7) Represents the market values of investments where distributions are at the sole discretion of the managers, plus all uncalled commitments. (8) Market and currency exposures are estimated by looking through managers and funds to the underlying security positions. Policy ranges express the expected variation in asset class, regional, and currency exposures during normal market circumstances. Totals may not add due to rounding. (9) Latin America, Middle East, and Africa. (10) Estimated market beta of the Long Term Pool with each asset class adjusted for its level of market risk. 25 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: III.C. ACTION REQUIRED: None Vice President’s Remarks BACKGROUND: The Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer will inform the Board of recent events that do not require formal action, but of which it should be made aware. 26 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF VISITORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BOARD MEETING: February 25, 2011 COMMITTEE: Finance AGENDA ITEM: III.D. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Status Report ACTION REQUIRED: None BACKGROUND: As reported at the June 2008 meeting, the University engaged KPMG to conduct an initial assessment of the University’s current framework for assessing and managing the University’s strategic and high-level operational risks. There are two phases to the ERM project. At the February 2009 board meeting the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer presented a report to summarize the work completed in Phase I, during which the University explored the feasibility and desirability of developing a framework that could link the different risk management programs that are already in place, including through the use of common vocabulary and metrics. As part of Phase II, KMPG conducted interviews with selected University officials and members of the Board of Visitors to begin developing the University’s portfolio of top risks. The product of Phase II is a set of risk registers that have been finalized. The Vice President and Chief Financial Officer sorted the identified risks in the registers into four categories: compliance risks, safety and security risks, operational risks and strategic risks. At the November 15, 2010 meeting of the Finance Committee, President Sullivan reported that the consolidated risk register had been reviewed by the vice presidents, who identified the most significant risks in their areas. The Health System was excluded from the original work on the risk register, but the President said it will be included in the future. DISCUSSION: Since November, the President has tasked the vice presidents with developing plans to handle the high-priority risks in their areas. At the same time, the President and vice presidents, with General Counsel and the Athletics Director, are now in the 27 process of examining prioritized institutional risks across all divisions. To determine appropriate action steps and oversight, the President is leading a working group that includes the vice presidents and General Counsel. A progress report will be provided to the Finance Committee. 28 MISCELLANEOUS FINANCIAL REPORTS Finance Committee University of Virginia February 25, 2011 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ACADEMIC DIVISION ACCOUNTS AND LOANS RECEIVABLE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 Summary of Accounts Receivable: The University's Academic Division's total accounts receivable at December 31, 2010 was $228,549,000 as compared to $51,698,000 at September 30, 2010. The December 31, 2010 amount includes billing for the spring semester due January 11, 2011. The major sources of receivables at December 31, 2010 were student accounts of $206,465,000 and sponsored programs of $19,302,000. The past due receivables over 120 days old were $3,037,000 as of December 31, 2010 or 1.33% of total receivables, which is below the Commonwealth's management standard of 10%. Student Accounts Gross Accounts Receivable Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Net Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable Greater than 120 Days Past Due Sponsored Programs Other Receivables Total $206,465,000 $19,302,000 $2,782,000 $228,549,000 $1,532,000 $807,000 $34,000 $2,373,000 $204,933,000 $18,495,000 $2,748,000 $226,176,000 $1,335,000 $1,613,000 $89,000 $3,037,000 SOURCE: Financial Administration DATE: January 21, 2011 29 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ACADEMIC DIVISION ACCOUNTS AND LOANS RECEIVABLE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 Summary of Loans Receivable: The default rate for the Perkins Student Loan Program was 6.69 percent for the quarter ending December 31, 2010. This is based on the cohort default calculation and is well below the 15 percent threshold set by federal regulations. The Health Professions Loan Program default rate remained the same at 0.0 percent. The Nursing Undergraduate Student Loan Program default rate decreased from 2.51 percent to 1.79 percent. Both medical loan programs are well below the 5 percent federal threshold. The University Loan Program default increased from 2.64 percent to 2.65 percent for the quarter ending December 31, 2010. Gross Loan Receivables Perkins Student Loans Health Professions Loans Undergraduate Nursing Loans University Loans Current Default Rate Inc/(Dec) From Last Quarter $19,504,000 6.69% 5.09% $0 0.00% 0.00% $1,316,000 1.79% -0.72% $15,856,000 2.65% 0.01% Total Student Loans Outstanding $36,676,000 SOURCE: Financial Administration DATE: January 21, 2011 30 Medical Center Financial Report University of Virginia Medical Center SUMMARY OF OPERATING STATISTICS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES Fiscal Year to Date w ith Com parative Figures for Prior Year to Date - Decem ber 2011 OPERATING STATISTICAL MEASURES - Decem ber 2011 DISCHARGES and CASE MIX - Year to Date Actual DISCHARGES: Adult Pediatrics Psychiatric Transitional Care Subtotal Acute Budget OTHER INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES - Year to Date % Variance Prior Year 11,598 1,435 727 19 13,779 11,478 1,678 548 55 13,759 1.0% (14.5%) 32.7% (65.5%) 0.1% 11,394 1,423 678 13,495 4,500 4,275 5.3% 4,304 Total Discharges 18,279 18,034 1.4% 17,799 Adjusted Discharges 24,556 24,017 2.2% 24,213 Short Stay/Post Procedure CASE MIX INDEX: All Acute Inpatients Medicare Inpatients 1.90 2.04 1.90 2.04 0.0% 0.0% 1.88 2.06 Actual Budget % Variance Prior Year ACUTE INPATIENTS: Inpatient Days Average Length of Stay Average Daily Census Births 83,178 6.05 452 834 83,693 6.08 455 824 (0.6%) 0.5% (0.7%) 1.2% 82,962 6.25 451 819 OUTPATIENTS: Clinic Visits Average Daily Visits Emergency Room Visits 336,042 2,896 28,817 321,758 2,791 29,969 4.4% 3.8% (3.8%) 337,093 2,922 29,816 9,359 4,181 13,540 9,283 4,078 13,361 0.8% 2.5% 1.3% 9,294 3,996 13,290 SURGICAL CASES Main Operating Room (IP and OP) UVA Outpatient Surgery Center Total OPERATING FINANCIAL MEASURES - Decem ber FY 2011 31 REVENUES and EXPENSES - Year to Date ($s in thousands) NET REVENUES: Net Patient Service Revenue Other Operating Revenue Total EXPENSES: Salaries, Wages & Contract Labor Supplies Contracts & Purchased Services Bad Debts Depreciation Interest Expense Total Operating Income Operating Margin % Non-Operating Revenue Net Income Actual $ 509,671 15,205 524,876 Budget $ 506,594 14,414 521,008 $ $ 228,097 108,621 106,319 17,858 28,850 4,107 493,852 31,024 5.9% 41,264 $ 227,660 113,382 110,542 19,695 31,432 3,947 506,658 14,350 2.8% 4,698 $ 72,288 $ 19,048 $ $ $ $ OTHER INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES - Year to Date % Variance 0.6% 5.5% 0.7% Prior Year $ (0.2%) 4.2% 3.8% 9.3% 8.2% (4.1%) 2.5% $ 116.2% $ 487,459 14,366 501,825 778.3% $ 217,229 110,413 98,740 17,834 27,074 3,038 474,328 27,497 5.5% 50,396 279.5% $ 77,893 ($s in thousands) NET REVENUE BY PAYOR: Medicare Medicaid Commercial Insurance Anthem Southern Health Other Total Paying Patient Revenue OTHER: Collection % of Gross Billings Days of Revenue in Receivables (Gross) Cost per CMI Adjusted Discharge Total F.T.E.'s (including Contract Labor) F.T.E.'s Per CMI Adjusted Discharge Actual $ $ $ 172,351 55,873 81,959 91,949 27,910 79,630 509,671 Budget $ $ 36.06% 45.97 10,202 $ 6,270 24.72 166,473 63,338 87,485 87,121 28,301 73,876 506,594 35.52% 45.0 10,671 6,253 25.21 % Variance 3.5% (11.8%) (6.3%) 5.5% (1.4%) 7.8% 0.6% 1.5% (2.2%) 4.4% $ (0.3%) 1.9% Prior Year 160,184 60,945 84,181 83,830 27,232 71,086 487,459 37.41% 45.46 10,020 6,140 24.80 University of Virginia Medical Center SUMMARY OF OPERATING STATISTICS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES Fiscal Year to Date w ith Com parative Figures for Prior Year to Date - Decem ber 31, 2010 Assumptions - Operating Statistical Measures Discharges and Case Mix Assum ptions Discharges include all admissions except normal new borns Pediatric cases are those discharged from 7 West, 7 Central, NICU, PICU and KCRC Psychiatric cases are those discharged from 5 East or Rucker 3 All other cases are reported as Adult Short Stay Admissions include both short stay and post procedure patients Case Mix Index for All Acute Inpatients is All Payor Case Mix Index from Stat Report Other Institutional Measures Assum ptions Patient Days, ALOS and ADC figures include all patients except normal new borns Surgical Cases are the number of patients/cases, regardless of the number of procedures performed on that patient Assumptions - Operating Financial Measures 32 Revenues and Expenses Assum ptions: Medicaid out of state is included in Medicaid Medicaid HMOs are included in Medicaid Physician portion of DSH is included in Other Non-recurring revenue is included Other Institutional Measures Assum ptions Collection % of Gross Billings includes appropriations Days of Revenue in Receivables (Gross) is the BOV definition Cost per CMI Adjusted Discharge uses All Payor CMI to adjust, and excludes bad debt UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA INTERNAL LOANS TO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS AND ACTIVITIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 PURPOSE DATE OF LOAN INTEREST RATE Cocke Hall 06/30/06 4.75% 1,941,787 1,753,931 187,856 June 2011 National Radio Astronomy Observatory Piping 09/01/06 6.25% 706,833 600,824 106,009 August 2011 Varsity Hall 06/30/07 4.75% 1,517,726 1,119,538 398,188 March 2012 Wilsdorf Hall 11/01/06 4.75% 3,311,328 3,142,719 168,609 November 2011 Wise Football Facility 10/01/07 4.75% 629,171 136,349 492,822 October 2022 Total Internal Loans Subject to ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS OUTSTANDING APPROXIMATE LOAN AMOUNT MADE TO DATE PRINCIPAL FINAL PAYMENT $ 8,106,845 $ 6,753,361 $ 1,353,484 1 $15M Limit Established by BOV NOTES: 1. Per January 1990 Board of Visitors resolution establishing the internal loan pool at $10 million and per April 2003 Board of Visitors resolution approving the expansion of the internal loan pool from $10 million to $15 million. All internal loans are subject to the approval of the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. 2. The University's blended borrowing rate for tax exempt financing is 4.75%. A taxable rate of 6.25% is being charged for the National Radio Astronomy Observatory Piping project. SOURCE: Financial Administration DATE: January 13, 2011 33 University of Virginia Capital Campaign Summary As of 12/31/10 All Units Expendable 992,109,111 Endowment 444,987,391 Total 1,437,096,502 Outstanding Pledge Balances Deferred Gifts 169,697,588 91,727,282 45,244,429 26,802,065 214,942,017 118,529,347 Private Grants 195,914,771 0 195,914,771 71,381,484 3,333,472 74,714,956 Gift and Pledge Total 1,520,830,236 207,842,636 520,367,357 53,531,715 2,041,197,593 261,374,351 Campaign Total 1,728,672,872 573,899,072 2,302,571,944 -148,880,236 1,107,682,643 958,802,407 1,371,950,000 1,628,050,000 3,000,000,000 Gifts and Pledge Payments Gifts in Kind Future Support Additional Amounts To Be Raised (1) Total Rector & Visitors Gift Accounts Only Expendable Gifts and Pledge Payments Outstanding Pledge Balances Endowment Total 356,985,034 32,913,388 244,012,193 5,767,135 600,997,227 38,680,523 Deferred Gifts Private Grants 60,038,845 0 11,524,077 0 71,562,922 0 Gifts in Kind 30,370,218 17,312 30,387,530 480,307,485 129,742,841 261,320,717 4,242,539 741,628,202 133,985,380 Gift and Pledge Total Future Support Campaign Total Additional Amounts To Be Raised 610,050,326 TBD Total 265,563,256 TBD 610,050,326 875,613,582 TBD 265,563,256 875,613,582 8,718,899 0 8,718,899 200,000 0 200,000 270,260 9,189,159 0 0 270,260 9,189,159 Rector & Visitors Unrestricted Giving Gifts and Pledge Payments Deferred Gifts Outstanding Pledge Balances Total (1) Excludes future or revocable support Source: Office of Development and Public Affairs Date: January 28, 2010 34 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ENDOWMENT/LONG TERM INVESTMENTS FOR UVA AND RELATED FOUNDATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 (in thousands) The University of Virginia Medical School and related foundations Rector and Visitors Funds Related Foundation Funds Invested by UVIM CO Alumni Association Funds Invested by UVIM CO Related Foundation Funds Invested by Direction of Foundation Board $ $ $ $ The College of Arts and Sciences and related foundations 692,100 31,473 7,487 - Total $ 731,060 309,256 45,240 10,194 3,521 368,211 40,737 201,787 - 93,197 335,721 Darden School and related foundation 103,544 195,709 - 6,201 305,454 Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy 102,921 - - - 102,921 The McIntire School of Commerce and related foundation 72,263 - 25,569 679 98,511 School of Engineering and related foundation 81,271 298 2,552 2,682 86,803 University of Virginia's College at Wise and related foundation 39,848 4,678 1,919 3,144 49,589 Graduate School of Arts and Sciences 46,307 - - - 46,307 School of Nursing 36,559 - 1,768 - 38,327 Curry School of Education and related foundation 11,799 7,679 - 1,746 21,224 School of Architecture and related foundation 15,450 208 380 712 16,750 School of Continuing and Professional Studies 1,601 - 46 - 1,647 University of Virginia Medical Center and related foundations 370,097 51,169 4,109 23,833 ** 449,208 Centrally Managed University Scholarships 143,389 - - - 143,389 Athletics and related foundation 37,076 58,260 350 512 96,198 Provost 84,217 - - - 84,217 - - 51,632 11,343 62,975 49,630 8,104 - - 57,734 University of Virginia Foundation and related entities - 56,815 - 221 57,036 Alumni Board of Trustees - 47,601 3 - 47,604 46,960 - 44 - 47,004 University - Unrestricted but designated 287,749 - - - 287,749 University - Unrestricted Quasi and True Endowment 159,987 - - - 159,987 University - Unrestricted Other 139,685 - - - 139,685 All Other 210,364 51,800 184,808 5,474 452,446 153,265 $ 4,287,757 The University of Virginia Law School and related foundation Alumni Association Miller Center and related foundation University Libraries $ 3,082,810 $ 760,821 $ 290,861 * $ *Includes funds on deposit for other areas/schools not individually listed. **Excludes approximately $44.7 million of board designated pension funds. SOURCE: Financial Administration DATE: January 27, 2011 35 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA QUASI-ENDOWMENT ACTIONS OCTOBER 1, 2010 – DECEMBER 31, 2010 The quasi-endowment actions listed below were approved by either (1) the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, under the following Board of Visitors’ resolutions, or (2) the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, under the delegation of authority from the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer: In October 1990 and June 1996 the Board of Visitors approved resolutions delegating to the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer the authority to approve quasi-endowment actions, including establishments and divestments of less than $2,000,000, with regular reports on such actions. In February 2006, the Board of Visitors approved a resolution permitting approval of quasi-endowment transactions, regardless of dollar amount, in cases in which it is determined to be necessary as part of the assessment of the business plan for capital projects. Additionally, to the extent that the central loan program has balances, they may be invested in the long term investment pool managed by UVIMCO or in other investment vehicles as permitted by law. Additions from Gifts Amount Commonwealth Engineering Professorships $ Commonwealth Commerce Professorships* 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 McIntire School of Commerce Bequest Gifts Quasi-Endowment 10,000.00 Osher Reentry Scholarship Quasi-Endowment Fund 30,884.00 President's Fund for Excellence Unrestricted Quasi-Endowment 133,088.54 Southwest-Dishner Gift Quasi-Endowment Fund 18,675.00 University Quasi-Endowment Fund (1) 399,909.62 Total Additions from Gifts to Quasi-Endowments $ 2,592,557.16 $ 265,000.00 Divestments Carlson Psychiatry Research Fund McIntire School of Commerce Operations Fund 898,758.75 Total Divestments from Quasi-Endowments $ 1,163,758.75 Notes: *Quasi-endowment newly established or initially funded since October 1, 2010. (1) Includes current unrestricted gifts to the University which, under a standing Board of Visitors resolution, are required to be added to the University's Unrestricted Endowment Fund. SOURCE: Financial Administration DATE: January 13, 2011 36 QUARTERLY BUDGET REPORT As of December 31, 2010 This report compares the actual results for the sources and uses of funds to the Academic Division annual budget (excluding the Medical Center and the University of Virginia’s College at Wise). At the end of the second quarter of 2010-2011, 68.8 percent of the budgeted sources were collected and 51.5 percent of the budgeted uses were expended. The operating budget is developed using differing rules and conventions from the audited financial statements, which are developed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). In some cases, similar descriptions are used in both reports even though the precise definitions and the specific amounts are not identical. However, both sets of figures are accurate for their particular purposes, and both are drawn from the University’s financial applications. Outlined below are several of the differing conventions used in the operating budget and the actual results presented on the accompanying statement: The operating budget is prepared on a cash basis. The operating budget presents tuition and fees as gross income and the full amount of student aid as an expense. In the operating budget, depreciation is not funded and non-capital outlay purchases are recognized as expensed rather than spread over the useful life of the purchase. Major repair or renovation expenditures occur within the capital outlay accounts – and off the operating budget. The Federal Family Education Loan Program is excluded from the operating budget. Sources of funds are shown net of transfers to capital reserves/projects in the operating budget for all sources other than auxiliaries, which are shown as gross sources, with the reserve transfers appearing as an auxiliary use. Fringe benefit expenditures are included in the operating budget using pooled benefit rates. The operating budget recognizes recoveries of indirect costs only upon distribution of those revenues, and not when billed to granting agencies. A definition of terms is included to explain the categories for the sources and uses of funds. SOURCE: University Budget Office DATE: January 13, 2011 37 University of Virginia Academic Division 2010-11 Operating Budget Report As of December 31, 2010 (in thousands) 2010-11 Revised Budget Sources of Available Funds Tuition & Fees State General Fund Appropriation Sponsored Research for Operating Plan Endowment Distribution for Operating Plan Net Gifts Available for Operating Plan Sales, Investment Income & Other American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Auxiliary Enterprises, including private sources Total Sources of Available Funds Uses of Available Funds Direct Instruction Research and Public Service Library, Information Tech., & Academic Administration Student Services General Administration Operation & Maintenance of Physical Plant Scholarships, Fellowships, & Other Graduate Support Athletics Bookstore Housing and Conference Services Other Auxiliary Operations Total Operating Expenses Operating Reserves and Temporary Allocations Total Uses of Operating Funds Net Sources and Uses for Operations 38 12/31/2010 Actual Results Variance 12/31/2010 Results Percentage $409,892 136,431 323,988 131,466 89,642 23,460 21,893 195,864 $1,332,636 $398,979 134,906 177,190 13,234 35,283 31,507 126,123 $917,222 $10,913 1,525 146,798 118,232 54,359 (8,047) 21,893 69,741 $415,414 97.3% 98.9% 54.7% 10.1% 39.4% 134.3% 0.0% 64.4% 68.8% $328,692 316,057 125,729 36,195 76,482 95,084 146,640 $155,115 165,056 68,635 15,980 44,930 55,632 79,229 $173,577 151,001 57,094 20,215 31,552 39,452 67,411 47.2% 52.2% 54.6% 44.1% 58.7% 58.5% 54.0% 51,395 29,875 37,227 76,907 $1,320,283 29,598 17,956 18,129 32,707 $682,967 21,797 11,919 19,098 44,200 $637,316 57.6% 60.1% 48.7% 42.5% 51.7% 6,370 1,326,653 682,967 6,370 643,686 0.0% 51.5% $5,983 $234,255 ($228,272) DEFINITION OF TERMS Sponsored Research -- primarily research projects, but also includes activities restricted to institutional and service programs. Auxiliary Enterprises -- those activities which are supported entirely through fees charged to users, such as housing, athletics, dining services, the telephone system and the bookstore. Instruction -- expenditures for the primary mission of the University, which includes teaching faculty, support staff, instructional equipment, and related routine operating costs. Research -- includes expenditures for activities such as support for research faculty and sponsored research. Activities include the Center for Public Service, the State Climatologist, and the Center for Liberal Arts. Public Service -- includes activities such as the Miller Center of Public Affairs, the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, and that portion of the medical school's clinical physicians’ salaries and fringe benefits related to patient care. Library, Information Technology and Academic Administration -- encompasses the libraries, the activities of the deans of the schools, and other related expenditures. Student Services -- activities whose primary purpose is to contribute to the students' emotional and physical well-being and to their intellectual, cultural, and social development outside the classroom. General Administration -- includes the financial, administrative, logistical, and development activities of the University. Operation and Maintenance of Physical Plant -- includes expenditures for activities related to the operation and maintenance of the physical plant, net of amounts charged to auxiliary enterprises and the Medical Center. 39 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SPONSORED PROGRAM GRANTS AND CONTRACTS MID-YEAR COMPARISON REPORT OF AWARD DATA FISCAL YEAR 2011, as of DECEMBER 31, 2010 (in millions) SCHOOL DHHS DOD DEd(1) DOE NASA 4.45 Education 1.58 Engineering 2.28 0.71 1.13 8.59 0.46 6.78 6.18 0.13 1.58 Non-Federal (1) (2) State (1) FY 2011 (3) FY 2010 (3) 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.15 0.32 -53% 7.05 2.12 3.45 0.20 28.17 30.04 -6% 0.87 0.05 2.40 1.46 13.14 10.95 20% 9.56 0.31 10.29 1.62 31.94 36.70 -13% 0.93 0.08 1.01 0.58 74% 30.50 2.89 120.69 147.28 -18% 1.29 0.00 2.59 3.13 -17% Law Medicine 79.89 Nursing 1.31 Other (4) 0.15 Mid-Year Total FY 2011 (3) 89.65 Mid-Year Total FY 2010 (3) % Increase/Decrease 6.62 0.13 0.00 0.36 Mid-Year Total Federal (1) NSF Architecture Arts & Scs. Mid-Year Total % Increase/ Decrease Other 0.30 0.54 0.05 0.00 0.33 2.65 1.19 2.04 6.95 4.47 55% 13.51 8.59 8.77 2.40 18.11 5.19 50.11 8.30 204.63 233.47 -12% 126.51 8.20 7.70 7.11 1.98 20.57 4.55 48.26 8.60 233.48 -29% 65% 12% 23% 21% -12% 14% 4% -3% Notes: Historically, mid-year totals have not been predictive of performance for the entire fiscal year. Totals may be off slightly due to rounding. 1) The University also provides administrative support for awards (not included here) for the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities and the Southwest Virginia Higher Education Center, totaling $0.71 million for the current period. 2) Items listed as "Non-Federal" include support from foundations; industrial sponsors; and subcontracts from other institutions, which may have originated from a federal agency. 3) Totals for mid-year FY2011 include $18.37 million in ARRA funding. Totals for mid-year FY2010 include $38.31 million in ARRA funding. 4) Includes: Associate Provost For Academic Support & Classroom Management; Center for Public Service; Darden School of Business; Miller Center; School of Continuing and Professional Studies; University Librarian; UVA College at Wise; Vice President and Chief Student Affairs Officer; Executive Vice President and Provost; Vice President for Research. SOURCE: Office of Sponsored Programs DATE: January 13, 2011 40 APPENDIX APPENDIX A UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA – ACADEMIC DIVISION SUMMARY OF BUDGET REQUESTS AND GOVERNOR'S BUDGET BILL (in 000s) 2010-2011 Request Governor's Budget GF NGF GF NGF Operating Federal Stimulus Funds Operations and Maintenance, New Facilities STEM Faculty Start-up Packages Subtotal Operating Capital Maintenance Reserve Rotunda Maintenance – Phases 1 and 2 Subtotal Capital A-1 Total $ - $ $ 542 - $ 542 - $5,026 $ - (contingent on debt capacity) 26,795 26,795 23,845 23,845 5,026 - (contingent on debt capacity) $31,972 $31,942 $5,026 5,177 $5,177 $ - - 8,097 $8,097 $ $ - $ 2011-2012 Request Governor's Budget GF NGF GF NGF $ 542 $ - 7,084 5,850 $12,934 $12,934 $ - 11,080 $11,080 $11,080 $ - $ $ $ - - $ - - $ - APPENDIX A (continued) UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA – MEDICAL CENTER SUMMARY OF BUDGET REQUESTS AND GOVERNOR'S BUDGET BILL (in 000s) 2010-2011 Request GF 2011-2012 Governor’s Budget GF NGF NGF Governor’s Budget GF NGF Request GF NGF Operating Medicaid Inpatient Payment Rates $ 9,484 $ - $ - $ - $15,296 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,484 $ - $ - $ - $15,296 $ - $ - $ - Capital None Total A-2 APPENDIX A (continued) UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA’S COLLEGE AT WISE SUMMARY OF BUDGET REQUESTS AND GOVERNOR'S BUDGET BILL (in 000s) 2010-2011 Request Governor’s Budget GF NGF GF NGF 2011-2012 Request Governor’s Budget GF NGF GF NGF Operating Federal Stimulus Funds Operations and Maintenance, New Facilities Subtotal Operating $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ 144 $ - $ - $ - $ - 340 340 $ $ 191 191 $ $ - $ $ 144 $ $ 854 854 $ $ 480 480 $ $ - $ $ - - $ - $ 105 $ - 340 $ 191 $ 105 $ 144 Capital Maintenance Reserve Total $ $ (contingent on debt capacity) $ 854 $ 480 $ - $ - A-3 APPENDIX B UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - ACADEMIC DIVISION 2010-2012 PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AMENDMENTS (in 000s) GF Operating STEM Faculty Start-up Packages $ Capital Rotunda Renovation ($2,590 GF needed in 2011-12) Total Patrons: - $ $ Senator Quayle, Delegate Tata 2010-2011 NGF - 2011-2012 GF - $ $ - NGF 5,850 $ 26,795 $ 32,645 - 23,845 $ 23,845 B-1 APPENDIX B (cont’d) UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA – MEDICAL CENTER 2010-2012 PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AMENDMENTS (in 000s) 2010-2011 GF NGF Operating Medicaid Inpatient Payment Rates $ Capital None $ - Total Patrons: 9,484 $ Senator Quayle, Delegate Tata Revised from submission to the Governor. 9,484 2011-2012 GF - $ $ - NGF 12,693 $ $ 12,693* - $ - B-2 APPENDIX B (cont’d) UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA'S COLLEGE AT WISE 2010-2012 PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AMENDMENTS (in 000s) 2010-2011 GF 2011-2012 NGF GF NGF Operating Operations and Maintenance, New Facilities $ 340 $ 191 Capital None $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 340 $ 191 $ 854 Patrons: Senator Puckett, Delegate Kilgore $ 854 $ 480 $ $ 480 B-3
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz