THE SECOND YEAR AT EMORY PROGRAM: ASSESSING A RESIDENTIAL SECOND-YEAR INITIATIVE Ben Perlman John Lynch Brett Page Emory University 15th National Students in Transition Conference 2008 GOALS FOR PRESENTATION Explain the basics of building a livinglearning community for second-year students Understand the history of Emory’s program Learn about different ways to assess your new initiative Identify implications for student affairs practice SNAPSHOT OF EMORY UNIVERSITY Private, selective, research university w/an undergraduate population <6,000 2-year live-on requirement Undergrad students admitted to liberal arts college Some students pursue education in business or nursing school after 2nd year of college Many of our students are interested in pre-health or preprofessional majors and programs THE SECOND YEAR AT EMORY PROGRAM Living-Learning Community dedicated to second-year student success 4th year of program Programs Career Planning Academic Advising Faculty Interaction Life Skills Traditions SYE TIMELINE @EMORY • • • • • • • Nov 2002: support and approval of the Campus Life Committee of the Board of Trustees Nov 2003: SYE Committee formed Fall 2004: began pilot program in predominately sophomore hall Summer 2005: extensive renovation of Woodruff, home to the program Fall 2005: official start of the program Fall 2007: Incorporation of second residence hall Fall 2008: Expansion to all of second-year housing SOPHOMORE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT MODEL Staged model in which second-year students move through 4 different stages: Random Exploration Focused Exploration Tentative Choices Commitment Student focus on these stages in three areas: Peer relationships Self Academic choices Schaller (2005) SCHALLER (2005) Friendships Self Academics Stage 1 Random Exploration Accepts friendships as they come, may be very unhealthy Wanders through life choices, not sure of what to believe Has not yet considered academic/major choice Stage 2 Focus Exploration Is disenchanted with friendships, frustrated with options Recognizes problems within self, bothered but not clear what to do Looking for major or career idea that might fit with self Stage 3 Tentative Choices Decides to keep some relationships and leave others Begins to make statements about beliefs, desires, describes self Found major or career, but still not clear how it will “work out” Stage 4 Commitment Makes healthy choices, “college buddies” Firm in description of self, knows what wants Sees how future will unfold, committed to career SCHALLER (2006) Implications for Community Colleges Financial Issues Developmental Education Use of credit/loans Loss of first-year aid Not directed enough in educational choices to make a choice of major Transfer Preparation EMORY NEEDED TO PURSUE SYE Gap between wealth of services for first-year students and absence of services for upperclassmen Concerns about students transferring and satisfaction issues New second-year living requirement STAFFING 2 Buildings Woodruff Hall Clifton Tower Full-Time Post-master’s degree Live-in Graduate Student Hall Director Part-time Live-in Hall Director Fellow Area Director Full-time Post-bach Live-in Academic Advisor Part-time Graduate student Live-in STUDENT STAFFING 1 Senior Resident Advisor (Senior) 17 Resident Advisors (Juniors and Seniors) 26 to 1 - Resident to RA Ratio SEMI-SUITE STYLE APARTMENT STYLE WOODRUFF SPACES Smart Classrooms Exercise Room Grilling Area Study Rooms RA Office WOODRUFF SPACES Drop-In Spaces Professional Staff Offices Dining Facilities Academic Advising Office ASSESSMENTS WE’VE DONE ASSESSMENTS • National instruments: – – • Educational Benchmarking Incorporated (EBI) National Study of Living Learning Programs (NSLLP) Local instruments: – – – – Sophomore specific survey SYE registration form ResLife Rewards program Program evaluations EBI Measures resident satisfaction and perceptions of learning experiences and climate Distributed online 3,000 undergraduate residents sampled 25% response rate EBI provides an in-depth statistical analysis accessible online and in paper format HIGHLIGHTS FROM EBI Sophomores in SYE residence halls were much more satisfied than sophomores not in SYE residence halls Sophomores in SYE residence halls reported higher perceptions of learning than sophomores in other SYE residence halls Students, in general, reported higher satisfaction and learning when they reported going to programs “often” NSLLP • • • • • • • Relatively new national instrument Uses the I-E-O model of assessment Measures input variables, environmental factors, and learning outcomes Distributed online Compares students in living-learning programs to students not in living-learning programs 17% response rate NSLLP provides a statistical analysis accessible in paper format HIGHLIGHTS FROM NSLLP Significantly higher than other LLP participants in terms of: Influences on signing up for program: wanted to live in a specific residence hall Perceived growth in cognitive complexity Perceived confidence in college success Confidence in problem-solving ability SOPHOMORE SURVEY Asked about learning, perceptions, and feedback Locally developed questions based on anecdotal feedback Distributed online Sent to all sophomores 30% response rate HIGHLIGHTS FROM SOPHOMORE SURVEY Second-Year students want more support from Residence Life Where students live as a second-year greatly impacts their perception of and participation in SYE. Programming for and interactions with second-year students must be different from those with first-year students Second-Year students want a stronger cohort identity/community HIGHLIGHTS FROM SOPHOMORE SURVEY More programming on… SYE REGISTRATION • • • • • Locally developed Originally used as an “application” into the SYE program Online All rising sophomores were required to complete the form if they wanted to live in the SYE designated buildings: Woodruff and Clifton 85% participation SYE REGISTRATION • • • • • Name, student ID # Please mark if you are interested in any business or graduate school programs: Pre-BBA, Pre-Health, Pre-Law, PhD or Master’s, Pre-MBA Please mark any majors you are currently pursuing or are interested in: (60 majors listed) Please mark the topics you would be interested in learning about at future SYE programs: Choosing a major, Health and Wellness, Career decisionmaking/Internships, Academic advising, etc. How would you contribute to or participate in the Second Year at Emory program? HIGHLIGHTS FROM SYE REGISTRATION Interest in professional or graduate programs HIGHLIGHTS FROM SYE REGISTRATION Top five majors: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Business Administration Economics Psychology Biology Chemistry HIGHLIGHTS FROM SYE REGISTRATION Top five programming interests: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Study Abroad Career Decisions & Internships Community Service Planning for Junior & Senior Year Choosing a Major ADAPTATIONS OF SYE REGISTRATION Require all rising sophomores to complete form as part of their housing sign-up process Make some questions more specific Ask about extracurricular involvement Use the form as a tool to get students to think about their sophomore year and future plans RES LIFE REWARDS • • • Stemmed from our finding that more engaged students generally were more satisfied and reported higher levels of learning Attendance at events is carefully tracked For every six programs a student attends he/she receives a reward – • • • Water bottle, hydro-clock, t-shirts, journals, etc. Analyze what types of programs students are interested in Analyze demographics and residence hall location associated with high attendance at programs Eventually we will analyze differences associated with high engagement versus low engagement PROGRAM EVALUATIONS Distribute online Normal satisfaction questions (how did you like this program?) Learning outcome related questions USING THE DATA SHARING AND INTERPRETATION Share data with RA’s and Hall Directors for programming and Coke Conversations Share aggregate data with other offices (particularly the Career Center, Business School, and Academic Advising) to assist them in their own planning Ask students and RA’s to interpret the data IDENTIFIED A NEED FOR CHANGE Sophomores felt left out of SYE programs Students did not have a clear sense of the purpose of SYE Students wanted more support and programming Residents felt disconnected from their student staff (Coke Conversations felt awkward) DEVELOPED PLAN FOR SYE • • • Form partnerships with more campus offices Offer programs and services that all sophomore residents can utilize Offer programs and services that support student development so that the students: – – – – • Develop greater self awareness Define goals for their Emory experience Utilize campus resources Connect with others through meaningful relationships Use assessment to plan and evaluate programs and show what learning occurs as a result of participation in SYE programs SYE LEARNING OUTCOMES • Developing Self-Awareness Demonstrated self reflection skills Identify personal strengths • Setting Goals Articulating their goals Choosing a major Think about possible career fields SYE LEARNING OUTCOMES • Finding Resources Identify required classes for their major Creating and maintaining a resume Identify co-curricular and extracurricular interests Identify university resources • Connecting With Others Displaying social skills necessary to live and work Forming meaningful relationships with students, staff, faculty, and alumni Feel stronger ties to the university ASSESSMENT PARADIGM SHIFT Old assessment model: Compare students in SYE to students not in SYE (“experimental group” vs. “control group”) New assessment model: Use involvement in SYE programs FUTURE ASSESSMENTS Research project: long term outcomes of the SYE program Development of a pre- and post- test survey instrument for sophomores Connecting assessment with 1st year program and upperclassmen experience to do a longitudinal analysis DISCUSSION GROUPS CONTACT INFO Ben Perlman John Lynch [email protected] [email protected] Brett Page [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz