Office of the Superintendent of Schools
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Rockville, Maryland
February 22, 2002
MEMORANDUM
To:
Members of the Board of Education
From:
Jerry D. Weast, Superintendent of Schools
Subject:
Revised Report on the 2001 Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills (CTBS)
The June 2001 report of the Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills (CTBS) is being updated to
reflect new information received from the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE)
regarding the calculation of the median percentile ranks for each subtest. The new calculation
requirements include scores of students who were previously excluded by MSDE because of
extended time accommodations provided through their Individualized Education Program (IEP)
or the requirements under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. As a result of the
change in calculation, the 2001 results reported for the Montgomery County Public Schools
(MCPS) and individual schools have changed in some subject areas and grade levels (see chart
below).
2000-2001 CTBS Mean National Percentile Ranks Updated to Reflect New Calculation
Nation and MCPS, Grades 2, 4, and 6
Nation
CTBS
Subtest
MCPS Grade2
MCPS Grade 4
MCPS Grade 6
2000
2001
2001*
2000
2001
2001*
2000
2001
2001*
Reading
50
64
64
64
75
75
67
70
70
64
Language
50
68
68
55
74
74
74
70
70
63
Mathematics
50
70
70
70
78
78
71
77
77
72
Language Mech.
50
77
77
77
68
75
68
69
69
60
Math. Computation
50
68
68
68
71
71
71
67
67
60
* Reflects new median percentile calculation required by MSDE in removing previously mandated exclusion of scores for
students with extended time accommodations for IEP and Section 504 requirements.
During the 2001 administration of the CTBS, there were 32,758 students in Grades 2, 4, and 6
who took the exam, of whom 2,707 students (8.2 percent) were given extended time
accommodations because of their IEP and 303 students (0.9 percent) who received similar
accommodations because of Section 504. MSDE previously had excluded the scores of these
students in the calculation of median percentile rank. (The median percentile rank is used for
Members of the Board of Education
2
February 22, 2002
comparative purposes among schools and school systems for each subtest, including
comparisons with national norms.) As earlier reported to the Board of Education, the manner in
which the state changed the calculation methodology and informed school districts is a matter of
dispute. At this time, the calculation methodology still is not entirely clear. Under MSDE’s
revised calculation requirements, for example, not all students with accommodations were
included. Students who received accommodations for the use of a calculator were excluded for
the first time. There has been no explanation from MSDE for the distinction between the two
sets of accommodations (extended time and calculators). We are awaiting direction from MSDE
about the requirements for the 2002 administration of the CTBS, which takes place next month.
The revised results still demonstrate that the school system continues to perform well above the
national data in all of the subtests for language, reading, and mathematics on the CTBS.
Nonetheless, the impact of the change in median percentile ranks has the effect of lowering some
results by as many as 13 points (Grade 2 language). Conversely, in several instances the results
stayed the same or increased. The fact that the changes are due to a difference in calculation
methodology means that the revised median percentile ranks for 2001 become the benchmarks
for future comparisons.
Attached are the revised CTBS results for each individual school. Principals had received
previously the individual student results, which are not affected by the calculation of the median
percentile ranks. Individual student reports that were mailed earlier this year contained
comparative data, including the median percentile ranks based on the original report. Due to
budgetary constraints and the lateness of the new information from MSDE about the change in
calculation, the individual student reports will not be revised this year. The individual student
reports for 2002 will contain the new information, with an appropriate explanation.
The CTBS remains a fundamental component of the overall accountability program for
Montgomery County, especially given the controversy regarding the Maryland School
Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP). The new method for calculating the final scores
does not change the usefulness of the assessment in providing students, parents, teachers, and
principals with individual student data about important instructional areas at pivotal points in the
educational process.
I will continue to keep you informed.
JDW:kmy
Attachment
Copy to:
Executive Staff
Principals
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----ASHBURTON ES
BANNOCKBURN ES
LUCY V. BARNSLEY ES
BEALL ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
85
61
70
55
82
73
85
61
70
55
82
82
85
61
70
65
94
94
85
61
70
70
87
79
84
61
69
68
90
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
67
59
73
84
84
75
67
59
73
90
82
82
66
59
73
82
75
75
67
59
73
85
85
78
67
59
68
87
80
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
76
56
57
82
90
90
76
56
57
82
95
95
76
56
57
94
94
94
76
56
57
87
87
87
76
56
57
83
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
48
51
60
84
84
75
48
51
60
90
82
82
48
51
60
89
82
82
48
51
60
97
91
85
48
51
54
94
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
76
69
71
73
73
73
76
69
70
68
68
68
76
69
71
77
77
77
76
69
70
79
79
75
76
69
70
76
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
120
114
125
84
84
84
120
114
125
90
82
82
120
114
125
89
89
82
120
114
125
91
91
91
119
114
118
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
94
90
95
73
64
64
94
90
95
68
68
68
94
90
95
77
87
77
93
90
95
70
60
60
93
90
94
83
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
85
83
91
67
67
60
85
83
91
57
82
74
85
83
91
61
61
61
87
83
91
71
78
78
87
83
90
80
71
71
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
BEL PRE ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
142
123
129
40
64
64
142
123
129
55
68
68
142
123
129
77
77
77
142
123
129
52
52
52
142
123
129
68
58
58
BELLS MILL ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
56
82
86
73
82
82
56
82
86
82
82
82
56
82
85
87
87
87
56
82
85
79
87
87
56
82
85
90
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
64
76
80
75
84
84
64
76
80
74
82
82
64
76
79
82
82
82
64
76
80
85
85
85
64
76
79
87
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
53
85
88
73
73
73
53
85
88
68
68
68
50
85
88
77
77
65
50
85
88
60
70
70
50
85
86
49
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
54
78
93
75
84
75
54
78
93
82
74
74
54
78
93
75
82
75
54
78
93
85
85
85
54
78
91
80
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
49
54
56
73
82
82
49
54
56
82
68
68
49
54
56
55
77
77
49
53
55
79
79
79
49
54
55
83
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
75
55
62
84
84
84
75
55
62
90
90
86
75
55
61
89
82
75
75
55
62
91
85
82
75
55
57
87
62
62
SCHOOL
------
BELMONT ES
BETHESDA ES
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----BEVERLY FARMS ES
BRADLEY HILLS ES
BROAD ACRES ES
BROOKE GROVE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
100
78
91
82
82
82
100
78
91
82
82
82
100
78
91
87
94
87
101
79
92
79
79
70
101
79
81
83
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
82
91
106
84
84
84
82
91
106
82
82
82
82
91
106
75
82
82
82
91
105
91
91
85
82
91
98
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
59
85
89
82
90
90
59
85
89
68
82
82
59
85
89
87
87
77
58
85
89
79
94
94
58
85
89
83
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
56
55
65
84
84
84
56
55
65
82
82
82
56
55
65
82
82
75
56
55
65
85
85
78
56
55
56
87
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
66
80
82
34
29
29
66
80
82
35
27
27
23
80
82
45
36
36
66
81
83
35
22
22
66
81
83
49
24
24
4
2000
2001
2001*
69
77
82
41
41
41
69
77
82
40
33
33
67
76
81
40
40
40
68
77
82
33
37
37
69
77
79
53
37
37
2
2000
2001
2001*
88
83
89
73
73
73
88
83
89
68
55
55
87
82
88
87
77
77
88
83
89
79
79
79
88
83
85
83
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
82
96
114
75
67
67
82
96
114
74
74
65
81
95
111
68
68
68
82
96
115
78
71
65
81
96
98
71
71
71
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----BROOKHAVEN ES
BROWN STATION ES
BURNING TREE ES
BURNT MILLS ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
63
45
55
47
47
47
63
45
55
55
43
43
61
45
54
65
77
60
62
45
54
43
43
29
62
45
49
40
40
31
4
2000
2001
2001*
45
51
61
60
67
60
45
51
61
57
57
49
.
51
59
53
53
46
51
59
47
47
47
46
51
52
45
45
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
53
49
55
55
55
55
53
49
55
55
55
55
53
49
55
77
65
55
54
49
55
60
60
60
54
49
55
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
52
45
54
60
45
45
52
45
54
65
57
53
52
45
54
61
68
57
52
45
54
65
58
50
52
45
50
62
45
41
2
2000
2001
2001*
77
75
83
90
90
90
77
75
83
82
82
82
77
75
83
94
94
87
77
75
83
87
87
87
77
75
79
90
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
81
67
78
92
92
92
81
67
78
90
96
96
81
67
78
95
95
92
81
67
78
91
97
91
81
67
74
94
94
94
2
2000
2001
2001*
77
90
93
40
40
40
77
90
93
35
35
27
77
90
93
55
65
65
77
90
93
43
43
43
77
90
93
58
40
40
4
2000
2001
2001*
94
82
97
54
49
45
94
82
97
57
57
49
90
82
97
46
53
53
94
82
97
53
53
47
93
82
83
45
53
53
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----BURTONSVILLE ES
CANDLEWOOD ES
CANNON ROAD ES
CARDEROCK SPRINGS ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
127
108
110
64
73
69
127
108
110
68
68
68
127
108
110
77
87
87
127
108
111
60
60
60
127
108
110
68
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
133
127
130
75
75
75
133
127
130
74
65
65
133
127
130
68
61
61
133
127
130
65
78
75
133
127
130
53
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
59
61
61
73
73
73
59
61
61
82
68
68
59
61
61
94
87
87
59
61
61
79
70
70
59
61
61
90
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
68
61
73
75
75
75
68
61
73
74
74
74
66
61
73
75
82
82
68
61
73
85
85
78
66
61
67
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
60
45
55
55
55
55
60
45
55
68
55
55
59
45
55
65
65
65
59
45
55
60
43
43
59
45
48
49
49
45
4
2000
2001
2001*
69
52
61
60
67
60
69
52
61
65
65
65
68
52
61
61
82
75
68
52
61
58
71
71
67
52
56
71
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
58
48
51
90
90
82
58
48
51
82
68
68
58
48
50
94
87
87
58
48
51
87
70
70
58
48
50
90
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
52
50
54
92
84
84
52
50
54
90
90
90
52
50
54
95
89
89
52
50
54
97
85
85
52
50
54
94
87
87
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----CASHELL ES
CEDAR GROVE ES
CHARLES R. DREW ES
CHEVY CHASE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
70
48
49
82
90
90
70
48
49
68
82
82
70
49
50
87
94
94
70
47
48
70
79
79
70
49
50
76
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
73
71
81
84
84
84
73
71
81
82
82
74
73
70
80
82
89
82
73
71
79
85
85
85
73
71
73
80
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
91
89
93
64
73
73
91
89
93
55
55
55
91
89
93
55
87
87
91
89
92
70
70
70
91
89
91
68
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
63
72
82
84
75
67
63
72
82
74
74
65
63
71
81
82
68
61
63
72
80
78
85
78
63
72
78
80
80
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
57
50
58
47
47
47
57
50
58
55
68
55
57
50
58
65
77
71
57
50
58
70
79
70
57
50
56
76
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
107
92
101
84
84
84
107
92
101
90
90
90
107
92
101
89
89
82
107
92
101
91
97
91
107
92
99
87
94
94
4
2000
2001
2001*
90
71
79
84
84
84
90
71
79
90
82
82
88
69
77
82
82
75
89
71
79
91
85
85
89
71
74
87
87
87
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----CLARKSBURG ES
CLEARSPRING ES
CLOPPER MILL ES
CLOVERLY ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
50
50
59
64
64
64
50
50
59
55
68
68
50
50
59
65
77
77
51
49
58
60
70
70
51
50
53
58
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
47
46
55
60
75
75
47
46
55
65
74
74
46
46
55
61
75
68
47
46
55
71
85
78
47
46
51
62
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
79
66
69
64
40
40
79
66
69
55
43
43
79
66
69
65
65
65
76
66
69
52
43
43
77
66
67
58
40
40
4
2000
2001
2001*
64
79
90
75
67
60
64
79
90
82
65
57
64
79
90
68
61
57
64
79
90
85
65
62
63
79
84
62
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
74
84
91
55
29
29
74
84
91
43
35
27
74
82
89
55
36
36
74
84
91
60
22
22
74
84
89
58
40
40
4
2000
2001
2001*
64
63
78
60
54
45
64
63
78
57
57
49
64
60
75
53
61
53
64
63
77
58
58
53
64
63
75
53
45
37
2
2000
2001
2001*
81
73
75
82
82
82
81
73
75
82
82
82
81
73
75
87
87
87
80
73
75
87
87
87
80
73
74
83
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
76
70
78
75
75
75
76
70
78
82
82
82
76
70
78
68
68
68
76
69
77
91
91
85
76
70
78
80
80
80
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----COLD SPRING ES
COLLEGE GARDENS ES
CRESTHAVEN ES
CAPT. JAMES E. DALY ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
37
55
55
90
90
90
37
55
55
82
68
68
37
55
55
77
94
94
37
55
55
87
79
79
37
55
55
90
94
94
4
2000
2001
2001*
97
94
95
92
92
92
97
94
95
96
96
96
97
94
95
89
95
95
97
94
95
97
97
97
97
94
94
98
94
94
2
2000
2001
2001*
81
58
61
64
73
73
81
58
61
55
68
68
81
58
61
55
77
77
81
58
60
60
87
83
81
58
60
58
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
74
79
82
92
67
67
74
79
82
82
65
65
74
79
82
75
68
68
73
79
82
85
71
71
73
79
81
71
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
88
90
97
55
47
47
88
90
97
55
43
43
88
90
97
77
65
65
89
90
97
52
52
43
89
90
91
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
85
101
114
60
60
60
85
101
114
65
65
57
85
101
114
68
75
68
85
101
114
65
65
58
85
101
108
62
62
58
2
2000
2001
2001*
105
101
107
40
47
47
105
101
107
35
55
55
106
101
107
65
65
65
108
100
105
52
52
52
108
101
106
40
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
86
94
107
67
60
54
86
94
107
65
65
65
86
93
106
61
61
53
87
94
107
65
58
53
87
94
99
62
62
53
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----DAMASCUS ES
DARNESTOWN ES
DIAMOND ES
DUFIEF ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
54
43
47
64
73
73
54
43
47
55
82
68
54
43
47
65
77
77
54
43
47
70
70
70
54
43
45
68
49
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
51
45
49
75
84
84
51
45
49
74
74
74
51
45
49
68
61
61
51
45
49
78
71
71
51
45
46
71
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
54
64
66
82
90
90
54
64
66
82
68
68
54
64
66
87
87
87
54
64
66
79
79
79
54
64
65
68
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
51
51
58
84
92
92
51
51
58
90
90
90
51
51
58
82
82
82
51
51
58
85
85
85
51
51
56
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
76
80
82
73
64
60
76
80
82
68
43
43
76
80
82
87
87
87
77
80
82
79
70
70
77
80
80
76
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
69
58
65
67
75
75
69
58
65
74
82
82
69
58
65
82
82
75
70
58
65
78
78
78
70
58
60
71
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
70
55
59
90
82
82
70
55
59
82
82
82
69
55
59
87
77
77
69
55
59
87
79
79
69
55
59
90
94
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
61
66
73
84
92
92
61
66
73
90
82
82
61
66
73
82
89
89
61
66
73
91
91
91
61
66
72
87
87
84
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
EAST SILVER SPRING ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
105
84
92
47
40
37
105
85
93
43
35
35
105
85
93
65
55
55
105
85
93
52
43
43
104
85
88
49
40
40
FAIRLAND ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
85
80
82
64
47
47
85
80
82
55
35
35
85
81
83
77
77
77
85
80
82
60
43
43
85
81
82
76
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
94
96
101
67
67
67
94
96
101
65
57
57
94
96
101
53
53
53
93
96
101
71
65
65
93
96
99
80
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
74
81
87
73
82
82
74
81
87
82
82
82
74
81
87
87
87
87
74
81
87
87
87
87
74
81
86
83
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
67
70
79
84
84
84
67
70
79
82
90
90
67
70
78
82
89
89
66
70
78
85
85
85
66
70
75
71
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
88
87
92
90
82
82
88
87
92
82
82
82
88
87
92
87
94
94
87
87
92
94
87
87
80
87
91
94
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
64
52
60
75
84
88
64
52
60
82
90
90
64
51
59
75
82
82
64
52
60
85
91
91
64
52
57
87
87
87
SCHOOL
------
FALLSMEAD ES
FARMLAND ES
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----FIELDS ROAD ES
FLOWER HILL ES
FLOWER VALLEY ES
FOREST KNOLLS ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
91
74
77
73
64
64
91
74
77
68
68
68
91
74
77
87
87
87
91
74
77
79
79
79
91
74
76
83
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
55
58
62
75
75
75
55
58
62
74
74
74
55
58
62
75
61
61
55
58
62
85
65
65
55
58
62
80
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
86
71
75
55
64
64
86
71
75
55
55
55
86
50
54
77
77
77
85
71
75
52
52
52
85
71
75
40
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
87
53
89
60
45
49
87
53
89
65
49
49
88
53
89
61
53
46
88
53
89
58
53
53
88
53
65
62
53
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
80
66
69
82
73
73
80
66
69
68
68
68
80
64
67
87
77
87
80
66
69
79
70
70
80
66
67
83
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
59
76
82
84
67
67
59
76
82
82
74
74
59
74
79
82
75
75
60
76
82
78
78
75
59
76
78
71
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
83
92
97
64
73
73
83
92
97
68
68
68
83
92
97
77
87
87
83
92
96
70
79
79
83
92
95
83
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
88
80
89
67
75
75
88
80
89
74
74
74
88
79
88
68
82
75
89
80
88
78
78
75
89
80
86
80
71
71
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----FOX CHAPEL ES
GAITHERSBURG ES
GALWAY ES
GARRETT PARK ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
62
70
77
47
47
47
62
70
77
27
43
43
62
70
77
65
65
65
62
70
77
52
52
52
62
70
73
49
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
101
96
115
84
84
75
101
96
115
90
90
90
101
96
115
82
82
75
101
96
115
91
91
85
101
96
103
80
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
72
84
86
40
34
34
72
84
86
43
35
35
72
84
86
77
65
65
72
84
86
60
43
43
72
84
86
58
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
89
40
84
45
45
49
89
79
84
49
57
49
89
79
84
40
46
46
89
79
84
53
47
47
89
79
79
53
45
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
126
103
108
55
64
64
126
103
108
55
68
68
126
103
108
87
94
91
126
103
108
70
87
79
126
103
108
76
90
87
4
2000
2001
2001*
96
104
115
67
67
60
96
104
115
65
65
65
96
100
109
53
61
53
97
104
115
58
53
53
97
104
107
71
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
58
66
73
73
73
73
58
66
73
82
82
68
58
66
72
77
87
87
59
66
72
79
79
79
59
66
72
68
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
76
65
74
75
84
84
76
65
74
82
90
82
75
65
74
82
82
82
76
65
74
85
91
85
76
65
74
71
87
87
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----GEORGIAN FOREST ES
GERMANTOWN ES
GLEN HAVEN ES
GLENALLAN ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
72
64
66
55
55
55
72
64
66
43
55
55
72
64
66
55
87
87
72
64
66
52
60
60
72
64
64
49
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
48
49
62
67
75
75
48
49
62
57
74
65
48
48
61
61
61
53
48
49
62
65
65
58
48
49
49
53
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
65
55
61
64
55
47
65
55
61
55
43
43
65
55
61
65
77
77
65
55
61
60
60
60
65
55
61
58
58
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
61
74
84
60
60
57
61
74
84
65
65
61
61
74
84
68
61
53
61
74
83
71
58
53
61
74
83
53
45
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
68
69
77
40
29
29
68
69
77
43
27
27
67
69
77
65
45
45
68
68
76
29
29
29
68
69
77
24
24
24
4
2000
2001
2001*
58
63
68
54
45
45
58
63
68
57
40
40
57
63
68
46
46
46
58
63
68
58
37
33
58
63
65
62
53
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
74
64
75
55
47
47
74
64
75
68
68
55
74
64
74
65
77
65
73
64
74
60
60
60
73
64
65
58
58
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
62
59
78
67
60
54
62
59
78
74
57
49
62
59
78
53
61
50
62
59
78
71
58
53
62
59
65
62
62
62
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----GOSHEN ES
GREENCASTLE ES
GREENWOOD ES
HARMONY HILLS ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
105
114
118
64
73
73
105
114
118
55
68
68
105
114
118
77
87
87
105
113
117
70
70
70
105
114
117
58
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
138
105
117
75
75
67
138
105
117
82
82
74
138
105
117
82
82
82
138
105
117
85
85
78
138
106
111
80
71
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
114
101
102
40
40
40
114
101
102
43
35
35
114
100
102
45
55
55
116
101
102
35
43
43
115
101
102
68
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
110
92
105
54
54
54
110
92
105
57
49
49
110
92
105
46
53
53
110
92
104
47
47
42
110
92
93
53
45
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
105
90
99
73
82
82
105
90
99
68
82
82
105
90
99
77
87
87
104
90
98
60
87
79
104
90
96
58
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
76
85
97
75
75
75
76
85
97
82
74
74
76
85
97
75
82
75
76
85
96
71
71
71
75
85
94
71
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
63
61
68
47
34
29
63
61
68
55
35
35
63
61
68
77
55
55
63
61
68
52
43
43
63
61
62
68
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
46
55
67
38
60
54
46
55
67
49
65
57
46
55
67
40
53
46
46
55
67
47
58
47
46
55
58
53
62
67
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----HIGHLAND ES
HIGHLAND VIEW ES
JACKSON ROAD ES
JONES LANE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
99
88
97
40
40
40
99
88
97
43
43
35
99
89
97
65
65
65
99
88
97
52
43
35
99
89
95
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
87
87
92
54
45
45
87
87
92
57
49
49
87
87
92
61
61
53
87
87
92
71
53
53
86
87
86
71
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
82
55
57
64
34
34
82
55
57
43
35
27
83
55
57
77
45
45
83
54
56
60
60
60
83
55
56
68
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
61
57
62
60
67
64
61
57
62
57
74
74
61
56
61
68
68
68
60
57
62
71
65
65
61
57
58
53
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
56
64
68
47
47
47
56
64
68
55
43
43
56
64
68
45
65
65
57
64
68
43
60
60
57
64
66
40
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
82
71
75
60
60
60
82
71
75
57
49
49
82
71
75
68
53
53
82
71
75
65
53
53
82
71
72
62
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
80
67
74
90
82
82
80
67
74
82
82
82
80
67
74
87
94
94
80
67
74
87
87
87
80
67
70
76
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
75
80
92
92
84
84
75
80
92
90
82
82
75
80
92
82
82
75
75
80
90
91
91
85
75
80
83
80
80
80
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----KEMP MILL ES
KENSINGTON PARKWOOD ES
LAKE SENECA ES
LAKEWOOD ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
107
102
106
47
40
47
107
102
106
55
35
35
107
102
104
65
55
55
106
102
106
52
43
43
106
102
104
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
91
93
105
67
54
54
91
93
105
65
57
57
91
93
105
53
61
53
91
93
104
58
53
53
91
93
98
62
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
49
40
52
73
90
82
49
40
52
82
82
82
49
40
52
77
87
82
48
40
52
79
79
70
49
40
49
76
83
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
44
41
58
75
84
75
44
41
58
82
82
82
44
41
58
75
89
82
44
41
58
85
85
78
44
41
51
71
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
52
49
54
64
64
64
52
49
54
68
55
55
52
49
54
65
77
77
52
49
54
70
70
70
52
49
51
76
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
65
47
59
60
67
67
65
47
59
65
65
65
65
43
54
68
75
68
65
47
60
78
65
65
65
47
54
71
71
67
2
2000
2001
2001*
92
84
94
82
82
82
92
84
94
82
82
82
92
84
94
94
94
94
92
84
94
87
87
87
92
84
90
90
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
84
82
96
84
84
84
84
82
96
82
82
82
85
82
96
89
89
82
85
82
96
85
91
85
84
82
91
87
87
87
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----LAYTONSVILLE ES
LUXMANOR ES
MARYVALE ES
S. CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
91
87
89
73
73
73
91
87
89
68
68
68
91
87
89
77
87
77
91
87
89
70
70
70
91
87
89
58
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
82
78
85
75
67
67
82
78
85
82
65
65
82
78
85
75
75
75
82
78
85
78
78
71
82
78
81
80
71
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
38
39
39
82
90
90
38
39
39
82
82
82
38
39
39
77
87
87
38
39
39
87
87
87
38
39
39
90
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
50
40
45
75
84
84
50
40
45
74
82
82
50
40
45
75
89
89
50
40
45
85
85
85
50
40
42
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
66
87
90
34
34
34
66
87
90
35
35
35
66
86
88
45
36
36
66
87
88
43
43
43
66
87
88
31
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
56
64
69
60
49
49
56
64
69
65
49
49
.
64
69
46
40
56
64
69
58
65
58
56
64
67
53
45
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
111
116
122
55
47
47
111
116
122
55
55
49
111
116
120
55
65
65
111
116
121
60
43
43
111
116
120
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
95
87
100
75
67
60
95
87
100
74
65
61
95
87
99
68
61
61
94
87
99
71
65
58
94
87
97
71
62
62
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----RONALD MCNAIR ES
MEADOW HALL ES
MILL CREEK TOWNE ES
MONOCACY ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
148
155
160
64
64
64
148
155
160
55
68
68
149
155
161
87
87
87
149
155
161
70
79
79
149
155
159
68
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
133
140
152
75
75
75
133
140
152
74
74
74
132
140
151
75
75
75
133
140
152
78
71
71
133
140
148
71
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
50
60
66
47
47
47
50
60
66
55
55
55
50
60
66
65
65
65
50
60
66
52
43
43
50
60
66
40
58
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
62
51
54
45
67
64
62
51
54
65
74
65
62
51
54
46
68
68
62
51
54
65
71
68
62
51
54
53
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
55
68
75
55
47
47
55
68
75
68
55
55
55
67
73
65
65
65
55
68
75
60
60
60
55
68
72
58
76
80
4
2000
2001
2001*
68
65
75
75
67
60
68
65
75
74
74
65
68
65
75
75
75
68
68
65
75
78
71
65
68
65
69
80
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
43
34
43
82
55
55
43
34
43
68
55
43
43
34
43
77
65
65
43
34
43
70
52
52
43
34
43
76
58
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
39
37
47
84
75
75
39
37
47
82
82
74
39
37
47
75
75
75
39
37
47
91
71
78
39
37
44
87
53
58
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
MONTGOMERY KNOLLS ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
77
89
91
55
47
47
77
89
91
43
43
43
77
89
91
65
65
65
76
89
91
60
52
43
76
89
90
58
40
40
NEW HAMPSHIRE ESTATES ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
106
115
119
34
29
29
106
115
119
35
35
27
106
115
119
55
45
45
107
115
119
29
29
29
107
115
119
31
31
31
NORTH CHEVY CHASE ES
4
2000
2001
2001*
76
72
73
92
92
92
76
72
73
90
82
82
76
72
73
89
82
82
76
72
73
91
78
78
76
72
73
87
80
80
OAK VIEW ES
4
2000
2001
2001*
76
77
87
41
49
49
76
77
87
40
57
57
74
77
87
40
53
46
76
77
87
42
65
58
76
77
82
45
71
71
OAKLAND TERRACE ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
100
112
116
55
47
47
100
112
116
55
43
43
100
112
115
65
65
65
101
112
116
60
52
52
101
112
115
58
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
108
93
125
67
67
67
108
93
125
74
74
74
108
93
124
68
82
68
107
93
125
78
71
65
107
93
95
62
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
77
80
84
64
55
55
77
80
84
55
55
55
77
80
84
65
55
60
76
80
84
70
60
60
76
80
84
68
68
63
4
2000
2001
2001*
83
68
90
75
75
67
83
68
90
82
82
65
83
68
88
68
68
68
83
68
87
78
71
65
83
68
82
62
71
62
SCHOOL
------
OLNEY ES
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
PINE CREST ES
4
2000
2001
2001*
65
89
99
60
67
60
65
89
99
57
57
57
65
89
99
61
61
61
65
89
99
58
53
53
65
89
97
53
62
62
PINEY BRANCH ES
4
2000
2001
2001*
179
153
169
67
60
60
179
153
169
65
65
57
179
139
154
53
53
53
179
153
168
65
71
65
175
153
158
53
53
53
POOLESVILLE ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
75
69
75
64
73
64
75
69
75
55
68
68
75
69
75
77
77
65
75
69
75
70
70
70
75
69
75
68
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
87
72
83
3
75
75
87
72
83
1
74
74
87
72
83
11
68
68
87
72
82
4
85
85
87
72
77
1
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
102
107
108
73
82
82
102
107
108
82
82
82
102
107
107
87
94
94
102
107
108
79
87
87
101
107
107
76
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
94
117
121
75
84
84
94
117
121
82
82
82
92
118
122
75
82
82
94
118
122
85
85
85
93
118
122
87
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
103
117
123
64
73
64
103
117
123
55
68
68
103
117
123
77
77
77
103
117
122
79
79
79
103
117
120
68
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
96
84
98
75
75
67
96
84
98
82
82
78
96
84
98
68
68
68
98
84
98
78
78
71
98
84
89
80
71
62
SCHOOL
------
POTOMAC ES
RACHEL CARSON ES
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----JUDITH A. RESNIK ES
RITCHIE PARK ES
ROCK CREEK FOREST ES
ROCK CREEK VALLEY ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
112
92
95
47
55
55
112
92
95
43
55
55
112
92
95
65
77
77
112
92
95
52
52
52
112
92
95
58
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
81
76
94
60
54
54
81
76
94
65
57
57
81
76
94
61
46
46
81
76
94
65
58
56
81
76
83
53
45
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
56
52
55
64
73
73
56
53
56
68
68
62
56
53
56
77
87
77
58
53
56
79
70
65
58
53
56
83
76
72
4
2000
2001
2001*
39
46
49
84
67
67
39
46
49
74
65
65
39
46
49
82
68
68
38
45
48
78
71
65
38
46
46
71
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
88
78
83
73
82
73
88
78
83
68
82
82
88
78
83
87
94
94
88
78
83
70
87
87
88
78
83
83
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
79
72
82
67
84
75
79
72
82
74
74
74
56
72
82
61
75
75
81
72
82
78
71
71
57
72
81
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
41
51
57
47
55
47
41
51
57
43
68
55
40
51
57
45
77
77
40
51
56
52
60
56
40
51
53
49
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
47
57
66
60
84
75
47
57
66
57
82
82
46
57
66
61
75
68
46
57
66
71
91
85
46
57
63
62
80
80
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----ROCK VIEW ES
ROCKWELL ES
ROLLING TERRACE ES
ROSEMARY HILLS ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
63
63
72
55
55
47
63
63
72
68
55
43
63
63
72
77
65
55
63
63
72
60
43
43
62
63
72
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
64
51
54
60
54
54
64
51
54
65
57
57
64
51
54
68
61
61
64
51
54
71
58
58
64
51
54
62
45
45
2
2000
2001
2001*
76
78
79
73
73
73
76
78
79
55
55
55
77
78
79
65
65
65
75
78
79
70
70
70
63
78
79
58
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
95
96
99
75
75
75
95
96
99
74
82
82
95
96
99
68
75
75
95
96
99
78
85
85
95
96
98
80
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
95
105
107
55
47
47
95
105
107
55
43
43
95
105
107
55
55
55
95
105
107
60
52
52
95
105
107
68
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
108
69
82
54
67
60
108
69
82
57
74
65
107
69
82
46
75
75
107
69
82
53
71
71
107
69
77
62
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
166
171
191
82
82
82
166
171
191
68
82
68
166
170
190
77
77
77
165
172
192
70
79
79
165
172
179
76
76
76
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----ROSEMONT ES
SALLY K. RIDE ES
SEQUOYAH ES
SEVEN LOCKS ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
82
72
76
29
40
40
82
72
76
35
55
55
80
71
75
45
55
55
81
72
76
22
43
39
81
72
74
24
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
59
53
63
54
67
54
59
53
63
65
65
57
57
53
63
53
61
53
57
53
63
58
58
47
57
53
59
80
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
109
117
128
64
55
47
109
117
128
55
55
43
109
117
128
77
65
60
108
118
129
60
43
43
108
118
128
58
40
31
4
2000
2001
2001*
108
112
125
60
75
67
108
112
125
57
74
74
107
111
124
61
68
68
108
112
125
65
65
65
108
112
118
53
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
89
93
98
55
55
47
89
93
98
68
55
43
89
93
98
87
65
65
89
93
98
79
79
70
89
93
96
83
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
97
111
118
84
75
75
97
111
118
74
74
74
96
111
118
75
82
75
95
111
118
78
78
78
92
111
110
71
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
49
38
42
73
82
78
49
38
42
68
68
68
49
38
42
87
87
87
49
38
42
79
87
87
49
38
39
90
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
45
43
47
84
84
84
45
43
47
90
82
82
44
43
47
82
82
75
44
43
47
91
91
91
45
43
44
87
87
87
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----SHERWOOD ES
SLIGO CREEK ES
SOMERSET ES
SOUTH LAKE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
67
73
80
64
64
55
67
73
80
68
55
55
67
73
80
77
87
82
68
73
80
79
70
60
68
73
79
76
76
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
61
61
77
84
67
60
61
61
77
82
74
65
61
61
77
75
82
68
61
61
77
91
78
71
61
61
72
94
80
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
47
102
110
64
73
64
47
102
110
55
55
55
47
102
110
65
65
65
54
106
114
70
70
60
54
106
113
76
76
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
74
68
80
60
54
54
74
68
80
57
65
57
73
68
80
61
53
46
74
68
80
71
58
53
74
68
77
71
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
72
72
74
90
90
90
72
72
74
95
82
82
71
72
74
87
94
91
71
72
74
87
79
79
71
72
74
83
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
49
63
72
84
84
84
49
63
72
82
90
90
49
63
72
89
89
89
49
63
72
85
91
91
49
63
69
80
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
80
74
79
40
55
47
80
74
79
43
43
43
80
73
78
65
65
55
80
74
79
35
43
43
80
74
77
49
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
55
79
89
54
60
60
55
78
88
40
57
65
55
79
89
40
68
68
57
79
88
42
58
53
57
79
82
53
53
53
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----STEDWICK ES
STONE MILL ES
STONEGATE ES
STRATHMORE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
80
79
84
73
73
69
80
79
84
68
68
55
80
79
84
77
87
87
81
79
84
70
70
70
81
79
84
76
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
85
93
98
67
60
60
85
93
98
65
57
57
85
93
97
61
61
61
86
93
98
71
53
53
85
93
97
62
37
37
2
2000
2001
2001*
124
113
116
82
82
82
124
113
116
82
82
82
124
113
116
87
94
94
124
113
115
87
94
94
124
113
115
83
90
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
113
120
133
84
84
84
113
120
133
82
82
82
113
120
127
82
89
89
112
118
131
91
85
85
112
120
125
87
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
70
74
80
73
73
73
70
74
80
82
82
82
70
74
80
94
94
94
70
74
80
79
87
83
70
74
80
94
94
90
4
2000
2001
2001*
81
78
87
84
84
84
81
78
87
82
82
82
80
78
87
68
89
89
82
78
87
78
78
78
81
78
83
71
87
87
4
2000
2001
2001*
151
123
140
60
54
49
151
123
140
65
57
49
151
123
140
46
46
46
151
123
140
53
42
42
151
123
126
45
45
45
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
83
81
87
64
55
47
83
81
87
68
55
55
82
81
87
65
65
65
86
81
87
43
43
43
86
81
86
49
40
36
4
2000
2001
2001*
69
65
74
60
67
67
69
65
74
65
65
65
69
65
74
61
68
68
71
65
74
71
71
71
71
65
68
71
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
70
78
81
29
47
40
70
78
81
35
43
43
70
78
81
55
65
55
70
77
80
29
43
39
68
78
78
31
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
73
75
96
45
45
41
73
75
96
40
49
40
73
74
95
53
61
46
73
75
96
53
53
42
73
75
80
62
45
45
TAKOMA PARK ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
163
135
135
73
73
73
163
135
135
82
68
68
163
135
135
65
77
77
166
135
135
70
79
79
165
135
135
83
83
83
THURGOOD MARSHALL ES
2
2000
2001
2001*
65
84
87
73
64
64
65
84
87
68
55
55
65
84
87
77
77
77
66
84
87
79
60
60
66
84
87
68
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
73
73
86
75
75
75
73
73
86
74
82
82
73
73
86
61
68
68
72
73
87
78
85
85
72
73
80
62
80
80
SCHOOL
-----STRAWBERRY KNOLL ES
SUMMIT HALL ES
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----TRAVILAH ES
TWINBROOK ES
VIERS MILL ES
WASHINGTON GROVE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
88
91
96
82
82
78
88
91
96
82
82
82
88
91
96
87
94
87
88
91
96
87
79
79
88
91
96
83
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
85
95
101
84
84
84
85
95
101
82
90
90
85
95
101
82
89
89
85
95
99
91
91
85
85
95
99
87
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
67
72
81
55
55
55
67
72
81
43
43
43
67
71
80
65
65
65
67
71
80
70
60
60
67
72
76
68
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
71
77
95
60
49
45
71
77
95
65
65
57
71
77
95
75
75
68
71
77
95
58
53
42
71
77
77
62
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
109
110
116
47
40
40
109
110
116
43
43
43
109
110
116
55
55
55
109
110
116
52
52
52
109
110
116
49
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
81
69
85
54
60
54
81
69
85
57
65
57
80
69
85
46
53
53
81
69
85
53
65
58
80
69
81
53
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
45
52
58
64
47
47
45
52
58
68
43
43
45
52
58
65
55
55
45
52
58
60
43
48
45
52
53
68
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
45
50
62
67
67
60
45
50
62
74
65
65
45
50
62
68
75
68
45
50
62
71
65
56
45
50
52
62
53
53
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----WATERS LANDING ES
WATKINS MILL ES
WAYSIDE ES
WELLER ROAD ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
110
82
84
64
55
55
110
82
84
55
68
68
108
82
84
77
77
77
110
82
84
52
52
52
108
82
84
58
49
49
4
2000
2001
2001*
90
103
111
67
67
60
90
103
111
74
65
65
92
103
112
82
75
75
92
103
111
71
65
58
92
103
109
71
62
62
2
2000
2001
2001*
81
89
93
64
47
47
81
89
93
55
55
55
81
88
91
65
65
65
81
89
92
52
60
60
81
89
91
40
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
80
74
83
54
75
67
80
74
83
57
74
74
79
74
83
46
68
61
79
74
83
65
71
65
56
74
76
53
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
111
93
97
82
82
82
111
93
97
82
82
82
111
93
97
94
94
94
110
92
96
87
87
87
110
93
96
90
83
83
4
2000
2001
2001*
85
104
106
84
84
80
85
104
106
90
82
82
85
104
106
89
89
89
85
104
105
91
85
85
85
104
105
87
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
97
96
101
40
47
47
97
96
101
43
55
43
97
96
101
77
77
77
97
96
101
43
52
43
97
96
101
58
68
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
83
96
102
60
54
54
83
96
102
65
57
57
83
96
102
68
61
61
83
96
102
71
65
58
83
96
98
80
80
80
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----WESTBROOK ES
WESTOVER ES
WHEATON WOODS ES
WHETSTONE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
51
46
47
82
90
90
51
46
47
68
82
82
51
46
47
65
87
87
51
46
47
87
87
87
51
46
47
76
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
43
42
53
92
92
92
43
42
53
96
90
90
43
42
53
95
95
95
43
42
53
91
91
85
43
42
47
87
80
80
2
2000
2001
2001*
61
37
43
55
73
64
61
37
43
55
55
43
60
37
43
77
77
77
61
37
43
60
70
60
60
37
42
58
76
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
43
54
63
84
84
75
43
54
63
65
74
74
43
54
63
75
75
68
43
54
63
71
78
71
43
54
56
71
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
86
88
90
47
40
40
86
88
90
55
43
43
86
88
90
65
77
77
88
88
89
43
52
52
88
88
89
49
58
58
4
2000
2001
2001*
83
94
99
38
45
45
83
94
99
40
49
49
83
95
99
53
68
68
84
95
100
47
42
42
84
95
98
53
53
53
2
2000
2001
2001*
90
94
98
47
55
51
90
94
98
55
68
68
90
94
98
65
77
77
89
94
98
60
60
60
89
94
95
76
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
72
74
82
54
60
60
72
74
82
65
57
57
72
74
82
53
68
68
72
73
81
65
71
71
72
74
76
62
71
71
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----WILLIAM TYLER PAGE ES
WOODACRES ES
WOODFIELD ES
WOODLIN ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
45
64
69
47
47
47
45
64
69
43
55
55
45
64
69
65
77
65
45
64
69
60
60
60
45
64
67
49
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
36
48
58
67
60
57
36
48
58
57
65
65
36
48
58
75
75
68
36
48
58
78
58
53
36
48
48
71
71
71
2
2000
2001
2001*
81
100
102
82
90
90
81
100
102
82
82
82
81
100
102
87
87
87
81
100
102
79
87
87
81
100
102
68
83
80
4
2000
2001
2001*
87
73
79
92
92
84
87
73
79
90
96
90
87
73
79
82
82
82
86
73
79
91
91
91
86
73
79
80
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
75
77
78
73
73
73
75
77
78
55
68
68
75
77
78
65
77
77
75
77
78
79
79
79
75
77
78
76
90
87
4
2000
2001
2001*
83
76
81
75
84
84
83
76
81
82
82
82
83
76
81
75
82
82
83
76
81
85
85
85
83
76
80
80
87
87
2
2000
2001
2001*
97
77
83
55
73
64
97
77
83
68
68
68
97
76
82
65
77
77
97
77
83
70
60
60
97
77
77
68
68
68
4
2000
2001
2001*
66
81
82
84
84
84
66
81
82
74
90
90
66
81
82
68
82
82
66
81
82
78
85
82
65
81
81
71
62
62
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
SCHOOL
-----WYNGATE ES
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
2
2000
2001
2001*
88
69
74
90
90
86
88
69
74
82
82
82
88
69
74
87
87
87
86
69
74
87
79
79
86
69
74
76
76
76
4
2000
2001
2001*
87
49
75
84
92
84
87
49
75
90
90
82
87
49
75
75
89
89
88
49
75
91
91
91
88
49
67
87
87
87
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR MIDDLE SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
ARGYLE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
165
177
202
52
58
52
165
177
202
51
51
48
167
178
203
50
50
42
167
177
201
55
60
55
166
178
180
60
53
53
JOHN T. BAKER MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
208
235
269
70
64
64
208
235
269
63
57
57
206
235
269
69
60
60
209
235
269
77
72
72
209
235
240
74
53
53
BENJAMIN BANNEKER MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
286
271
272
64
64
64
286
270
271
63
57
57
281
263
264
60
60
60
292
273
274
66
66
66
288
273
274
53
60
60
BRIGGS CHANEY MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
209
206
262
64
58
58
209
206
262
63
57
57
208
203
258
60
50
50
209
206
261
72
60
60
209
206
215
60
47
47
CABIN JOHN MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
269
251
275
82
82
76
269
251
275
77
84
77
268
250
273
79
88
79
269
251
275
87
87
87
268
226
258
87
87
80
CHEVY CHASE ES
6
2000
2001
2001*
85
72
87
88
88
82
85
72
87
84
84
84
85
72
87
88
79
79
85
72
87
91
87
82
85
72
78
80
74
74
ROBERTO CLEMENTE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
200
228
261
58
58
52
200
228
261
51
57
51
201
228
261
60
60
60
201
229
260
60
60
55
200
229
242
53
53
53
SCHOOL
------
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR MIDDLE SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
EASTERN MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
133
245
275
52
76
70
133
246
276
51
77
63
133
246
276
50
79
69
133
246
277
55
82
72
133
246
263
47
67
67
WILLIAM FARQUHAR MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
191
193
226
70
76
76
191
193
226
70
70
70
189
193
225
79
69
69
191
192
223
82
77
77
191
193
201
80
67
67
FOREST OAK MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
232
264
310
70
64
58
232
264
310
63
57
57
222
262
304
60
69
60
234
263
309
72
66
60
230
265
277
53
53
53
ROBERT FROST MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
279
321
352
88
82
82
279
321
352
90
84
84
278
321
352
88
88
88
279
322
350
91
91
87
279
322
334
87
87
87
GAITHERSBURG MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
189
182
217
70
70
64
189
182
217
70
70
63
187
178
212
69
69
60
189
182
217
72
72
72
189
182
194
47
53
53
HERBERT HOOVER MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
292
321
369
82
82
82
292
321
369
84
84
77
271
320
367
79
79
69
294
321
369
91
91
87
294
321
346
87
80
80
JOHN POOLE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
124
107
132
70
76
70
124
107
132
63
70
70
105
107
131
60
69
69
122
107
130
82
77
77
120
107
119
74
60
60
JULIUS WEST MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
260
297
338
70
64
61
260
297
338
70
63
63
259
296
320
69
69
69
260
297
339
72
77
72
259
297
305
67
60
60
SCHOOL
------
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR MIDDLE SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
FRANCIS S. KEY MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
295
291
317
58
52
47
295
291
317
57
51
45
298
290
314
50
50
50
298
290
314
60
55
50
297
291
294
53
42
42
MARTIN L. KING MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
259
281
320
70
64
58
259
281
320
63
63
57
259
281
320
79
69
69
259
282
321
72
72
66
259
282
321
67
53
47
KINGSVIEW MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
326
333
393
64
70
70
326
333
393
70
70
63
324
328
376
69
69
69
327
334
394
77
82
77
326
334
357
67
67
67
COL. E. BROOKE LEE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
241
156
216
82
52
47
241
156
216
77
45
45
238
155
205
79
50
42
244
156
212
82
60
53
243
156
167
74
53
53
MONTGOMERY VILLAGE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
194
180
218
58
58
50
194
180
218
57
57
51
194
180
218
60
50
50
197
182
220
66
60
55
197
182
188
53
53
53
NEELSVILLE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
250
256
281
58
64
64
250
256
281
51
63
57
249
256
281
50
69
69
250
255
280
60
66
60
249
256
264
53
60
60
NORTH BETHESDA MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
163
156
184
82
82
82
163
156
184
84
70
70
162
156
181
79
79
69
163
157
184
87
87
87
161
157
166
74
74
74
SCHOOL
------
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR MIDDLE SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
NORTH CHEVY CHASE ES
6
2000
2001
2001*
82
78
79
82
82
82
82
78
79
77
84
84
82
77
78
88
79
79
82
78
79
87
87
87
82
78
79
80
74
74
PARKLAND MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
305
348
402
47
47
42
305
348
402
45
45
39
303
347
402
50
50
46
307
347
402
50
55
50
307
348
359
47
47
47
THOMAS W. PYLE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
358
326
379
88
88
82
358
326
379
84
84
84
358
325
376
79
79
79
360
329
381
91
91
87
360
329
354
80
87
87
REDLAND MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
236
256
281
70
70
70
236
256
281
70
63
63
211
255
280
69
69
69
236
256
281
82
77
77
235
256
265
67
60
60
RIDGEVIEW MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
264
252
305
70
76
70
264
252
305
70
77
70
1
250
301
60
79
69
263
252
302
72
82
77
1
252
274
67
67
67
ROCKY HILL MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
232
187
223
76
76
70
232
187
223
70
70
63
228
181
217
69
69
60
231
187
222
77
72
66
231
187
202
67
53
53
ROSA PARKS MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
281
280
327
76
76
70
281
280
327
70
77
70
269
280
327
79
79
79
280
280
327
82
77
77
278
280
294
74
67
67
SCHOOL
------
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000
MCPS CTBS MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK FOR MIDDLE SCHOOLS (STANDARD ADMINISTRATION)
SPRING 2000 & 2001, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS FOR 2001
===============================================================
READ
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
LANG
MECH
NO.
TSTED
-----
LANG
MECH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
MATH
COMP
NO.
TSTED
-----
MATH
COMP
MDIAN
%TILE
-----
GRADE
-----
YEAR
----
READ
NO.
TSTED
-----
SHADY GROVE MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
218
194
236
70
64
58
218
194
236
63
57
51
218
194
235
69
60
60
216
194
236
72
72
66
215
194
212
60
53
53
SIL. SP. INTER. MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
232
231
280
52
58
58
232
231
280
57
57
51
231
229
262
60
50
50
232
.
0
55
42
.
232
.
0
SCHOOL
------
.
SLIGO MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
344
346
383
52
52
52
344
346
383
57
57
51
342
344
379
50
50
42
340
345
379
55
60
55
339
346
353
53
47
47
TAKOMA PARK MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
290
267
301
76
88
82
290
267
301
77
84
84
288
267
297
69
79
69
291
267
299
87
87
87
290
267
291
74
74
74
TILDEN MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
170
176
198
76
82
76
170
176
198
77
77
77
170
175
197
79
79
79
170
176
198
87
87
82
170
176
181
74
74
74
WESTLAND MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
183
199
238
82
82
76
183
199
238
77
84
77
183
198
237
79
79
69
183
199
238
87
87
82
183
199
224
80
80
74
WHITE OAK MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
224
237
279
64
58
52
224
237
279
63
57
51
223
236
275
69
60
50
224
237
278
72
66
58
224
237
244
67
47
47
EARLE B. WOOD MS
6
2000
2001
2001*
255
278
316
64
70
64
255
278
316
63
70
63
254
278
316
69
69
69
255
278
316
72
77
72
255
278
288
67
60
60
* RESULTS ACCORDING TO A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE MEDIAN NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK BY MSDE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT USED IN YEAR 2000