Operational Assessments: Utilizing Productivity Standards Ross Manson Principal – Eide Bailly 701.239.8634 [email protected] Mary Klimp CEO – Queen of Peace Hospital 952.758.8101 [email protected] www.eidebai lly.com Agenda Health Care Industry reform and the need for change Productivity standard principles Process reviews “Tools” The implementation process www.eidebai lly.com Health Care Industry Trends Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act Bending the cost curve Utilization rates changing Technology trends and improvements www.eidebai lly.com USA Health Expenditures as a % of GDP 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 1960 1970 1980 1990 www.eidebai lly.com 2000 2009 2017 Total Expenditures on Health Care as a Percentage of GDP Japan United Kingdom Spain Italy Netherlands Greece Norway Portugal Canada Germany France Switzerland United States 0 2 4 6 8 Percentage of GDP Source: OECD Health Data 2007 www.eidebai lly.com 10 12 14 16 Reform Bill Provisions Value-based purchasing Quality reporting Hospital-acquired conditions Readmissions reductions Independent Medicare Advisory Board Demonstration projects www.eidebai lly.com The Need for Change Industry trends are creating a need for health care organizations to change their operations and become more efficient and eliminate waste Demand for Quality Increasing Cost Demand Changes Increasing Need for Transparency Increasing Use of Technology www.eidebai lly.com Need for Change Why implement productivity standards? Track progress of strategies Monitor financial outcomes, operational efficiencies, and patient quality Accountability Commitment Proactive Competitive positioning www.eidebai lly.com Approach to Productivity Management Proper decisions and success can only occur by: Use of benchmarks Review of current processes Understanding the reimbursement process www.eidebai lly.com Step 1: Reimbursement Opportunities Often overlooked by providers Coding Charge capture Pricing Physician education Difficult to hold staff accountable if organization has not taken every step to capture all earned revenue www.eidebai lly.com Process Review Processes established by management are often the cause of the inefficiencies However, we tend to hold the staff accountable for the inefficiencies, without allowing them the means to become more efficient www.eidebai lly.com Review of Processes Need to individualize to each department in each facility What types of patients on each unit? Where is the work done? How is the work done? Who is doing the work? www.eidebai lly.com Departmental Issues Staff mix Facility layout Staffing patterns Staggered shifts Variable staffing plans Staffing for the situation that “might” occur Managing “extra minutes” Ordering and stocking supplies Physician discharge times www.eidebai lly.com Benchmarks Benchmarks provide guidance as to the recommended or normal staffing levels of individual departments Facility must maintain necessary statistical information Staff must understand the benchmark Benchmarks assume an ability to gather data consistently Must assure “apples to apples” comparison www.eidebai lly.com Benchmarks Benchmarks are not averages Benchmarks ARE best practices www.eidebai lly.com Productivity Management Proper productivity management results in: Formalizes departmental expectations Develops consistency across departments Achieving the necessary financial goals Creating a positive work environment www.eidebai lly.com Internal vs. External Benchmarks • External – advantages and disadvantages • Internal – advantages and disadvantages • If you have no productivity standards in place we recommend you start with Internal Benchmarks. www.eidebai lly.com The Value of Lean • Reduce cost through improved efficiency and allocation of resources • Reduce time for every day processes; giving time back to the organization for additional initiatives and improvements • Improve satisfaction of patients and staff as waste is eliminated from processes and procedures www.eidebai lly.com What is “Lean” • Lean is a continuous improvement and problemsolving approach • A work philosophy for achieving rapid progress by identifying and eliminating waste • Lean process involves using tools and team resources to achieve goals www.eidebai lly.com Principles of Lean Implementation of lean processes relies on the following basic principles: Pursue Excellence Allow Customers to Drive Services Eliminate Waste Principles of Lean Define Customer Value Create Value Streams www.eidebai lly.com Lean Terminology • Six Sigma Approach: Problem focused with a view that process variation is waste and that utilizes statistics to understand variation • Lean Approach: Focused on process flow and views any activity that does not add value as waste and utilizes uses visuals to understand the process flow. • Kaizan: Continuous, incremental improvement of an activity to create more value with less waste • Non-Value Added Activities : Activities or actions taken that add no real value to the product or service making such activities or action a form of waste • Value Stream: The specific activities required to design, order and provide a specific product, from concept to launch, order to delivery, and raw materials into the hands of the customer www.eidebai lly.com Lean Tools • 7 Categories of Waste: Used to identify waste within a current process • 5 S: A visually oriented system for organizing the workplace to minimize waste • Process Flow Charts: Visual map identifying the steps and interconnecting points in a process • Value Stream Map: Map used to analyze the flow of materials and information www.eidebai lly.com Implementing the Operational Assessment What do you want to accomplish? Where do you start? What do you do with all this data? How do you maintain momentum? ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. What do you want to accomplish? Improve efficiency Assess staffing model/needs Monitor outcomes Improve financial performance ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. 24 Where do you start? Interdisciplinary teams Setting standards Process improvement Data collection ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. What do you do with all of the data? Benchmarks Productivity measures Data collection tools ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. How do you maintain efficiencies? Monthly comparisons Commitment ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. Staffing Matrix Revised Feb 2010 Census Staff/shift 9.4 Staff/shift 7.0 Ratio Charge nurse Team leaders HUC/AIDE M-F HUC PMs Sat-Sun D& E 15 5.9 4.4 3.8 1 3 2 1 1 9.4 14 5.5 4.1 3.5 1 3 2 1 1 7 13 5.1 3.8 3.3 1 3 *1 or 2 1 1 12 4.7 3.5 3.0 1 3 *1 or 2 1 1 11 4.3 3.2 2.8 1 3-D 2 or 3 -N *1 or 2 1 1 10 3.9 2.9 2.5 1 2 (look at acuity) 2 if 2 RN's, 1 if 3 RNs 1 1 9 3.5 2.6 2.3 1 2 2 or 1 (house needs) 1 1 8 3.1 2.3 2.0 1 2 2 or 1 (house needs) 1 1 7 2.7 2.0 1.8 1 2 1 1 1 6 2.4 1.8 1.5 1 2 1 1 1 5 2.0 1.5 1.3 1 *2 or 1 1 1 1 4 1.6 1.2 1.0 1 1 1 1 1 3 1.2 0.9 0.8 1 1 1 1 1 2 0.8 0.6 0.5 1 1 *1 or 0 1or 0 1 or 0 1 0.4 0.3 0.3 1 1 * 1 or 0 1or 0 1 or 0 1 1 *1 or 0 1or 0 1 or 0 M/S 0 * Assess the needs housewide ICU ER Census Charge nurse RN's 0 na 0 Day shift Evenings 1 na 2 na 1 0 0 1 HUC for am cares only 0 3 4 na 1 or 2 (acuity/dischg) 1 if only 1 RN (acuity) acuity na 2 0 0 5 na 2 acuity 0 7a-7p (7d/wk) 11a-11p (M-Th) 7a-7p 7p-7a (Friday) 9a-9p (Sat/Sun) 7p-7a (7d/wk) 1 RN 1 RN 1RN days/1RN nights 1 RN 1 RN *this person can go in on call mix if ER is slow OB Census Charge nurse 7a-7p 7p-7a 0 na 1 (Float or inhouse call) 1 (float or inhouse call) 1+1 na 1 1 2+2 na 1 3+3 na 2 4+4 na 2 2 5+5 na 2 or 3 (acuity) 2 or 3 (acuity) Outpatients and Labors refer to ACOG guidelines Highlighted areasQueen ©2006 are changes for 2010 of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. 1 2 Queen of Peace Quarterly Benchmark Analysis Period Ending December 31, 2007 Med/Surg/Peds Qtr Ending Qtr Ending Qtr Ending Qtr Ending Qtr Ending Qtr Ending Qtr Ending Qtr Ending 6/30/2005 6/30/2006 9/30/2006 12/31/2006 3/31/2007 6/30/2007 9/30/2007 12/31/2007 10.88 13.08 15.89 16.42 14.99 16.65 14.06 13.01 Comments Benchmark High but improved ICCU/CCU 7.00 HPPD 16 to 18 HPPD Obstetrics 26.29 7.52 Emergency 3.64 2.36 2.91 3.60 3.42 2.60 2.31 2.40 High 1.75 Patients Surgery 7.68 8.36 9.95 12.30 11.78 9.61 11.05 10.71 High 5.0 to 8.0 Patients Same Day Surgery 4.59 4.65 7.26 7.30 7.19 7.57 5.80 6.09 High 5.50 Patients Recovery 1.03 1.03 0.49 0.80 0.54 0.82 1.13 0.89 Below 1.20 Patients 2.20 2.38 2.30 2.18 2.24 2.25 2.14 Core Staffing 2.02 1.29 1.24 1.23 1.16 1.13 1.14 Below 1.60 Patients 1217 Total Worked Hours Women's Health Center Outpatient Clinic 1.60 12 to 14 HPPD Patient Visits Cardiac Rehab 913 956 1280 1255 1280 1318 1267 1357 High Respiratory Therapy 0.30 0.80 1.08 0.80 0.75 0.81 0.95 0.99 High 0.086 0.055 0.064 0.061 0.062 0.065 0.067 0.056 Physical Therapy 0.85 0.62 0.64 0.70 0.64 0.65 0.62 0.60 Below 0.65 Procedures Lab 0.30 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.27 Below 0.35 Procedures Radiology 1.51 1.49 1.62 1.58 1.71 1.54 1.61 1.68 High Public Relations/Community Ed 0.15 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.29 0.36 Core Staffing .08 to .10 Adjusted Patient Day Business Office/Finance 0.50 0.44 0.48 0.50 0.49 0.46 0.45 0.47 Good .40 to .60 Registrations Admin 0.64 0.35 0.76 0.70 0.63 0.57 0.53 0.66 None Available Nursing Admin & Quality 0.95 0.51 0.53 0.91 0.94 0.96 1.57 1.45 None Available Health Information Service 0.42 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.43 Good Registration 0.31 0.35 0.37 0.37 0.40 0.39 0.37 0.37 Below Human Resources 0.14 0.25 0.14 0.26 0.28 0.35 0.45 0.38 Materials Management 0.37 0.35 0.39 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.46 Good .35 to .48 Adjusted Patient Day Dietary 0.51 0.35 0.37 0.35 0.34 0.36 0.41 0.43 High .17 to .34 Meals Housekeeping 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.54 0.53 0.50 0.54 0.57 Good .50 to .65 Hrs/1000 sq ft/day Laundry 1.85 2.30 2.16 2.28 1.77 2.36 2.60 2.26 Good 1.5 to 3.0 Pounds Pharmacy 0.37 Procedures Core Staffing 0.034 Procedures 1.46 Procedures Adjusted Patient Day Adjusted Patient Day .40 to .50 Registrations .38 to .50 Registrations None Available Adjusted Patient Day ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. Information Systems 0.28 0.38 0.30 0.38 0.39 0.38 0.36 0.45 High .25 to .38 Adjusted Patient Day Engineering 0.14 0.15 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.20 Good .16 to .22 Hrs/1000 sq ft/day ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential. ©2006 Queen of Peace Hospital. Proprietary and Confidential.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz