Complete Streets for public health Making it Better Conference November 16, 2011 Ethan Fawley, Fresh Energy Small Group Exercise: Draw a “complete” street What are “complete” streets? Complete Streets are designed and operated to be safe and accessible for pedestrians, transit riders, bicyclists, and drivers—all users, regardless of age or ability. What do “complete” streets look like? Vary by local context Typically include sidewalks and safe crossing points in urban and suburban areas Typically include bike lanes or path on busier roads Include texturized curb ramps for wheelchair users and visually impaired Many types of “complete” streets Example: Franklin Ave in Minneapolis The “incomplete” 12-inch wide Sidewalk Heading to the “complete”… New businesses Why? Access and equity Health Environment High gas prices Personal preferences Quality of life Main Street vitality Tourism SAFETY Benefits: Health Residents are 65% more likely to walk in a neighborhood with sidewalks Cities with more bike lanes per square mile have higher levels of bicycle commuting Complete Streets are recommended by: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Minnesota State Obesity Plan Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, American Heart Association, Minnesotans for Healthy Kids Coalition, and Minnesota Public Health Association Benefits: Health 30 60 25 50 20 40 15 30 10 20 5 10 0 0 N Percent Walk, Bike,Transit Percent of Obesity Obesity is lower in places where people use bicycles, public transportation, and their feet. d ia a d e d y n y n ia s d k SAalan tr al nad elan anc lan Ital pai ma n e de ustr land rlan mar U e us a Ir Fr in S er w A er tze en F Z A C G S eth Swi D ew N Obesity Walk, Bike, Transit Pucher, “Walking and Cycling: Path to Improved Public Health,” Fit City Conference, NYC, June 2009 Benefits: Health States with the highest levels of biking and walking have, on average, the lowest rates of obesity, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Bicycling and Walking in the United States: 2010 Benchmarking Report, Alliance for Biking and Walking Example: Albert Lea Blue Zones AARP, Dan Buettner, and the City led project to improve the length and quality of lives Life expectancy of 786 full participates increased by an average of 2.9 years Project included “walking moias,” walking school buses, walkability audit, and a new Complete Streets subdivision ordinance City added first bike lane in 2011 The Potential Nationally: 50% of trips 3 miles or less 28% of trips 1 mile or less 72% of trips of 1 mile or less are driven Source: Dan Burden What is a Complete Streets policy? Directs transportation planners and engineers to consistently design roads will all users in mind Declares political support for building “complete” streets Sets a vision for a Complete Streets process Focused on safety and accessibility of all road users Offers implementation steps Growing national movement 290+ policies in last 11 years 90 Number of Policies Adopted 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Growing Minnesota movement Local resolutions or policies Rochester Hennepin County St. Paul Albert Lea Bloomington Duluth Independence Byron Stewartville Big Lake St. Louis Park Fargo-Moorhead Metro COG Red Wing New Hope North St. Paul Breckenridge Pipestone St. Cloud APO Rochester-Olmsted COG Dilworth Battle Lake Wilkin County Eagan State policy for Mn/DOT signed May 15, 2010 by then-Governor Pawlenty after strong bi-partisan legislative support Getting started on Complete Streets in your community Most common process in Minnesota 1. Understand the case for Complete Streets—decide whether to go for a policy or project to start 2. Work group drafts a resolution of support 3. Council/board approves resolution 4. Work group creates a full policy 5. Council/board approves policy 6. Implementation and reporting Step 1: Understanding the case • Determine some compelling potential benefits for your community – Connect with comprehensive plan – Safety, health, environment, schools, economic, etc. • Connect with a few potential allies across focus areas • Find local examples—or upcoming local projects that could be case studies • Begin to engage engineers Key Potential Challenges Concern about costs Opposition from local engineer Misinformation about what Complete Streets means Partisan politics Neighborhood opposition to implementation Source: http://www.planetware.com Complete Streets and cost Focus is taking advantage of regular road building as an opportunity; not about an additional program or retrofits About balancing the available space in the right of way—not expanding Complete Streets and cost About maximizing the value of public investment across many goals None of the cities, counties, or states have needed to raise additional money to pay for Complete Streets and no community has later reversed their policy Key Policy Strategy Takeaways Work with the engineers as early and positively as possible Build a campaign focused on what you need for success Partner with allies from various perspectives Be willing to compromise, but don’t sell out Engage media Key Policy Strategy Takeaways Messages Key message is safety, especially for seniors and kids Find tangible, personal good and bad stories Address cost head on Pedestrians are a safer message focus than bicyclists Public doesn’t know what Complete Streets means, so connect to safe roads every time Messengers Engineers, principals, doctors, moms with kids, seniors, people with disabilities Cater to who you need to reach Common Points of Discussion “We already do this.” Cost Lane Widths Emergency vehicle access Traffic Speeds Number of lanes Functional classification What you need for successful implementation Strong political support Stamina Knowledge Find and cultivate supportive engineers Project supporters—reach out to community EARLY!!!! Some Resources MN Complete Streets Coalition toolkit American Planning Association Complete Streets best practices manual National Complete Streets Coalition implementation toolkit coming soon www.completestreets.org Complete Streets Exercise 76th Street in Richfield Basic Info Mostly residential with some commercial 7,000 ADT with little projected increase Road is straight and flat Neighborhood complaints about speeding Neighbors don’t feel very comfortable walking directly next to road No area for snow storage on sidewalk side Interest in extending a regional trail on one side Interest in adding street trees Interest in better supporting walking and biking Existing utility lines are an issue Right of way = 60 feet wide Existing street = 44 feet wide (Very) basic engineering in feet Traffic Lane widths Minnesota State Aid Standards call for at least 11 feet (working to get down to 10 feet) Turn lanes can sometimes be 10-feet wide High speed or rural roads typically 12 feet Number of lanes State Aid Standards require four lanes at 15,000 ADT Also driven by Level of Service (intersection delay) Bike lane widths Guidance calls for 5- or 6-feet wide Sidewalk widths Typically at least 5-feet wide, minimum of 4 feet Share-use path widths Typically 10’ minimum, can go to 8’ in right context Boulevard widths Some communities have standards 76th Street After Before After For More information: www.mncompletestreets.org www.completestreets.org www.fresh-energy.org
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz