The Electric Form Factor of the Neutron via Recoil Polarimetry to Q 2 1 4 7 (GeV/cc)2 B. Plaster , R. Madey† , A. Yu. Semenov† , S. Taylor , A. Aghalaryan‡ , E. Crouse§ , G. MacLachlan¶, S. Tajima , W. Tireman† , Chenyu Yan† , A. Ahmidouch†† , B. D. Anderson† , H. Arenhövel‡‡, R. Asaturyan‡ , O. Baker§§, A. R. Baldwin† , H. Breuer¶¶, R. Carlini , E. Christy§§ , S. Churchwell , L. Cole§§, S. Danagoulian †† , D. Day , M. Elaasar††† , R. Ent , M. Farkhondeh , H. Fenker, J. M. Finn§ , L. Gan§§ , K. Garrow , P. Gueye§§ , C. Howell , B. Hu§§ , M. K. Jones , J. J. Kelly¶¶ , C. Keppel§§, M. Khandaker‡‡‡, W.-Y. Kim§§§ , S. Kowalski , A. Lung , D. Mack , D. M. Manley† , P. Markowitz¶¶¶ , J. Mitchell , H. Mkrtchyan‡ , A. K. Opper¶ , C. Perdrisat§ , V. Punjabi‡‡‡ , B. Raue¶¶¶, T. Reichelt , J. Reinhold¶¶¶ , J. Roche§ , Y. Sato§§, I. A. Semenova† , W. Seo§§§, N. Simicevic†††† , G. Smith , S. Stepanyan‡ , V. Tadevosyan‡ , L. Tang§§ , P. Ulmer‡‡‡‡ , W. Vulcan , J. W. Watson† , S. Wells†††† , F. Wesselmann , S. Wood , Chen Yan , S. Yang§§§ , L. Yuan§§ , W.-M. Zhang† , H. Zhu and X. Zhu§§ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 † Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Virginia 23606 ‡ Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan 375036, Armenia § The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187 ¶ Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701 Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 †† North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411 ‡‡ Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, D-55099 Mainz, Germany §§ Hampton University, Hampton, Virginia, 23668 ¶¶ University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904 ††† Southern University at New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70126 ‡‡‡ Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia 23504 §§§ Kyungpook National University, Taegu 702-701, Korea ¶¶¶ Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199 ££££ Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, D-53115 Bonn, Germany †††† Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana 71272 ‡‡‡‡ Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23508 CP675, Spin 2002: 15th Int'l. Spin Physics Symposium and Workshop on Polarized Electron Sources and Polarimeters, edited by Y. I. Makdisi, A. U. Luccio, and W. W. MacKay © 2003 American Institute of Physics 0-7354-0136-5/03/$20.00 625 Abstract. The Jefferson Laboratory E93-038 collaboration conducted measurements of the ratio of the electric form factor to the magnetic form factor of the neutron, G nE GnM , via recoil polarimetry from the quasielastic 2 He e¼n1 H reaction at three values of Q 2 [viz., 0.45, 1.15, and 1.47 (GeV/c) 2 ] in Hall C of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. The preliminary results for G nE at Q2 045 and 1.15 (GeV/c) 2 are consistent with the Galster parameterization; however, the preliminary result for G nE at Q2 147 (GeV/c)2 lies slightly above the Galster parameterization. INTRODUCTION The electric form factor of the neutron, GnE , is a fundamental quantity needed for an accurate description of both nucleon and nuclear structure. The Jefferson Laboratory E93-038 collaboration conducted measurements of the ratio of the electric form factor to the magnetic form factor of the neutron, g GnE GnM , at three values of Q2 [viz., 0.45, 1.15, and 1.47 (GeV/c)2 ] via recoil polarimetry from the quasielastic 2 He en1 H reaction. Data were taken in Hall C of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility from September 2000 to April 2001. EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUE Top Rear Array Rear Veto/Tagger Front Array To HMS e Bottom Rear Array Front Veto/Tagger Lead Curtain e Charybdis Target LD2, LH2 FIGURE 1. A schematic diagram of the polarimeter. The experimental arrangement is shown in Fig. 1. A beam of longitudinally polarized electrons scattered quasielastically from neutrons in a 15-cm liquid deuterium target. In the plane-wave approximation, the polarization vector of the recoil neutron lies in the scattering plane [1] and consists of two components: The longitudinal component, PL , and the sideways component, PS , are parallel and perpendicular, respectively, to the recoil neutron’s momentum vector. The scattered electron was detected and momentum analyzed by the Hall C High Momentum Spectrometer (HMS) in coincidence with 626 the recoil neutron. A neutron polarimeter (NPOL) designed specifically for E93-038 by Madey [2] measured the up-down scattering asymmetry from a transverse projection of the recoil neutron’s polarization vector. A dipole magnet (Charybdis) located ahead of the polarimeter precessed the polarization vector through an angle χ which permitted asymmetry measurements from different transverse projections of the polarization vector. The polarimeter consisted of 20 detectors in the front array and 12 detectors in each of the two (upper and lower) rear arrays for a total of 44 plastic scintillation detectors. A double layer of thin scintillators (“veto/tagger” detectors) located directly ahead of and behind the front array detected incoming and scattered charged particles. The 100 cm 10 cm 10 cm dimensions of each detector in the front array permitted high luminosity; in addition, a collimator shielded each detector in the rear array from the direct flux of particles from the target. A 10-cm lead curtain located at the entrance of the collimator attenuated the flux of electromagnetic radiation and low-energy charged particles incident on the polarimeter. For the duration of the experiment, the polarimeter was fixed at an angle of 46Æ relative to the incoming beam, and the mean flight path from the target to the front array was 7 m. The ratio of the electric form factor to the magnetic form factor of the neutron, g GnE GnM , is g K tan δ (1) where K is a function of kinematic variables and tan δ PS PL [3]. After precession through an angle χ , the transverse projection, and hence the scattering asymmetry, is proportional to sin χ δ ; therefore g can be obtained by extracting δ from a fit of the scattering asymmetries as a function of χ . A significant advantage of this experimental technique is that the analyzing power of the polarimeter cancels in the ratio of PS to PL ; the beam polarization also cancels provided the polarization is stable. At each Q2 point, scattering asymmetry measurements were conducted with precession angles of χ 40Æ ; in addition, scattering asymmetry measurements with precession angles of χ 0Æ and 90Æ were conducted at Q2 115 and 1.47 (GeV/c)2 . The measurements at Q2 045 and 1.47 (GeV/c)2 were associated with beam energies of 0.884 and 3.395 GeV, respectively. The measurement at Q 2 115 (GeV/c)2 is the weighted average of a measurement at Q2 114 (GeV/c)2 associated with a beam energy of 2.33 GeV and a measurement at Q2 117 (GeV/c)2 associated with a beam energy of 2.42 GeV. ANALYSIS AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS Data were collected with an event defined to be a triple coincidence between an electron in the HMS, a neutral particle in the front array of the polarimeter, and a neutral or charged particle in the rear array of the polarimeter. Inelastic events were rejected via the application of a 100 MeV/c missing momentum cut and a relative 3% to 5% bite on the momentum of the scattered electron. Typical time-of-flight spectra from a representative run at Q2 117 (GeV/c)2 are shown in Fig. 2. The left panel (cTOF) is a histogram of the difference between the 627 10000 4000 8000 3000 Counts Counts measured time-of-flight from the target to the front array of the polarimeter and the timeof-flight calculated for quasielastic scattering. The right panel (∆TOF) is a histogram of the difference between the measured time-of-flight between a neutral event in the front array and a neutral or charged event in either the upper or lower rear array and the time-of-flight calculated for elastic np scattering. The secondary peak centered at approximately 2.5 ns is the result of π 0 production in a scintillator in the front array. The ∆TOF spectrum shown in Fig. 2 can be decomposed into four ∆TOF spectra for scattering events to either the upper (U) or lower (D) rear array for the R () or L () helicity state of the incoming beam. From the yields in the four ∆TOF spectra, the cross ratio, r, can be calculated; the cross ratio is defined to be the ratio of two geometric means, NU ND 12 and NU ND 12 , where NU ND is the yield in the ∆TOF peak for neutrons scattered up(down) when the beam helicity was postive(negative). The physical scattering asymmetry is then given by r 1r 1. 6000 4000 2000 1000 2000 0 -20 -10 0 10 20 cTOF [ns] 0 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 ∆TOF [ns] FIGURE 2. Typical cTOF and ∆TOF spectra from a representative run at Q 2 117 (GeV/c)2 . Our preliminary results for GnE are plotted as the filled squares in Fig. 3 together with the current world data on GnE obtained via polarization measurements [4-12]. In order to extract GnE from our measurements of g, we used the dipole parameterization for GnM with a 5% relative uncertainty. Our preliminary results for G nE at Q2 045 and 1.15 (GeV/c)2 are consistent with the Galster [13] parameterization; however, our preliminary result for GnE at Q2 147 (GeV/c)2 lies slightly above the Galster parameterization. The error bars that are plotted for our preliminary results reflect statistical errors only; however, the systematic errors are small compared to the statistical errors. Corrections resulting from the finite acceptance of the polarimeter and final state interactions have not yet been applied to our preliminary results for G nE ; these effects are currently under investigation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the TJNAF Hall C scientific and engineering staff for their outstanding support. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, the Depart- 628 FIGURE 3. The current world data on G nE versus Q2 obtained via polarization measurements. Our preliminary data are represented by filled squares. The Galster parameterization is shown as the solid line for Q2 07 (GeV/c)2 , and its extension to higher Q 2 is shown as the dashed line. The points on the abscissa are projections. ment of Energy, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA) operates the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility under the U.S. Department of Energy contract DE-AC05-84ER40150. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. N. Dombey, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 236 (1969). J. Scofield, Phys. Rev. 113, 1599 (1959) and 141, 1352 (1966). A. I. Akhiezer and M. P. Rekalo, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 4, 277 (1974). R. Madey, A. Lai, and T. Eden, Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Physics, edited by E. J. Stephenson and S. E. Vigdor, A.I.P. Proceedings No. 339, 47-54 (1995). R. G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson, and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C 23, 363 (1981). T. Eden et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, R1749 (1994). M. Meyerhoff et al., Phys. Lett. B 327, 201 (1994). J. Becker et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 6, 329 (1999). J. Golak, G. Ziemer, H. Kamada, and W. Glöckle, Phys. Rev. C 63, 034006 (2001). M. Ostrick et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 276 (1999). C. Herberg et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 131 (1999). I. Passchier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4988 (1999). D. Rohe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4257 (1999). H. Zhu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081801 (2001). S. Galster, H. Klein, K. H. Schmidt, D. Wegener, and J. Blechwenn, Nucl. Phys. B 32, 221 (1971). 629
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz