Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Minnesotans Patient Experience Measures and Quality Compositing for Total Care Hospital Reports What is the issue? In the total care reports released confidentially to hospitals in April 2013, hospitals were compared on dimensions of cost and quality. The quality dimension included twenty-six process measures and sixteen outcome measures. Patient experience measures from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey were reported, but not included in the composite quality score. A number of stakeholders have argued that patient experience represents a critical component of provider quality and should therefore be included in the quality composite of future PPG hospital reports. The Minnesota Department of Health is interested in discussions with the Advisory Committee about whether patient experience should be included in future hospital quality composites and, if so, what weight should be assigned to that dimension of quality vis-à-vis others currently making up the total quality score. Considerations: In considering this issue, the Advisory Committee should weigh the following context: The HCAHP survey from which patient experience measures are drawn is a nationally standardized survey of views of recently-discharged hospital patients on their hospital stay. The survey asks patients to assess how well nurses and doctors communicated; whether patients’ pain was relieved; whether their room was clean and quiet at night; and whether information about their ongoing care needs was shared with them. As such, the survey intentionally signals the importance of information obtained directly from patients and reminds us that the patient perspective is singularly informative for judging meaningful progress towards health reform goals. The initial PPG Advisory Group convened by MDH recommended that for the first hospital PPG reports, patient experience measures should be reported outside of the quality score – that the measures should be publicly reported, but should not become part of the overall quality score. That recommendation was based on the relative recency of the development and public reporting of these measures. HCAHPS patient experience measures have now been publicly reported nationwide and in Minnesota for six years. The CAHPS surveys are used in CMS pay-for-performance programs (Hospital Value-Based Payment (HVBP), and Accountable Care Organizations) as a step towards the goal of ensuring patient and family engagement in their care. In composites, the weight of the patient experience measures ranges from 25 percent (Medicare Shared Savings Program) to 30 percent (HVBP). 85 East Seventh Place • PO Box 64882• St. Paul, MN, 55164-0882 • (651) 201-3560 http://www.health.state.mn.us An equal opportunity employer Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Minnesotans At this point, patient experience reporting is not routinely required of all Critical Access Hospitals. As such, requiring patient experience reporting as part of a stand-alone quality dimension will eliminate some CAHs from reporting – hospitals that don’t meet the thresholds for all quality domains are excluded from reporting. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that patient experience measures from the HCAHPS be included in the quality composite of the next PPG report and be initially weighted conservatively, at 20 percent. To accommodate this addition, the weight of the other domains would be reduced proportionately, e.g., outcome sub-composite equal to 60 percent (was 70 percent), process sub-composite equal to 20 percent (was 30 percent), and patient experience sub-composite equal to 20 percent. Finally, the Department should consider how to routinely obtain patient experience data from CAHs. Until that is the case, patient experience should not be included as a stand-alone sub-domain in the CAH hospital PPG report. 85 East Seventh Place • PO Box 64882• St. Paul, MN, 55164-0882 • (651) 201-3560 http://www.health.state.mn.us An equal opportunity employer
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz