Sponsored by This booklet is brought to you by the AAAS/Science Business Office Institute of Human Virology Commemorating a Q u a r te r Ce n t u r y o f H I V/A I D S R e s e a rc h Contents Introductions 2 A Retrovirus Retrospective 3 The Once and Future Robert C. Gallo Sean Sanders E. Albert Reece Science Articles 4 Detection, Isolation, and Continuous Production of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and Pre-AIDS Mikulas Popovic, M.G. Sarngadharan, Elizabeth Read, et al. 10 Frequent Detection and Isolation of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and at Risk for AIDS Robert C. Gallo, Syed Z. Salahuddin, Mikulas Popovic, et al. 14 Serological Analysis of a Subgroup of Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) Associated with AIDS Jörg Schüpbach, Mikulas Popovic, Raymond V. Gilden, et al. 18 Antibodies Reactive with Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) in the Serum of Patients with AIDS M. G. Sarngadharan, Mikulas Popovic, Lilian Bruch, et al. Perspectives From Cause to Care, HIV/AIDS Research at Twenty-Five 24 The National Cancer Institute’s Role in AIDS and Cancer 27 Understanding Causation Leads to Treatment 29 On the Discovery of Human Retroviruses: Interleukin-2; HTLV-I and HTLV-II; Isolation of HIV-1 Robert Wiltrout, John Niederhuber Samuel Broder Anders Vahlne 32 An HIV Vaccine—When and How? José Esparza, Francine E. McCutchan, George K. Lewis, Robert C. Gallo 35 New Directions in HIV Therapy and Prevention— The Next 25 Years Robert R. Redfield, William A. Blattner 38 Cancers and HIV Infection: An Evolving Story 41 The Interface of Cancer and HIV/AIDS Vaccines: Both Preventive and Therapeutic Robert Yarchoan, C. David Pauza Jeffrey Schlom, Douglas Lowy, John Schiller The Institute of Human Virology 725 W. Lombard St. COVER Artist’s view of a human T cell as a globe, with the chemokine CCL3L1 shielding the cell from infection by HIV-1 (circles with red spikes) by virtue of its interaction with the HIV coreceptor CCR5 (yellow). CCL3L1 is represented by green circles emanating from green bands on chromosome 17, with the intensity indicating differences in gene dose (fluorescence in situ hybridization courtesy of Robin Leach). [Image: S. K. Ahuja and D. Baker] This booklet supported in part by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Baltimore, MD 21201 Editor: Sean Sanders, Ph.D.; Copy Editor: Robert Buck; Designer: Amy Hardcastle Guest Editor: C. David Pauza, Ph.D.; Editorial Assistance: Lauren Moscato www.ihv.org © 2009 by The American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved. 1 May 2009 A Retrovirus Retrospective The Once and Future Robert C. Gallo Twenty-five years ago a series of four papers containing the first description of the human inmmunodeficiency virus (HIV)—then called HTLV-III—were published in the journal Science. Representing the work of Dr. Robert Gallo, his colleagues and collaborators, these research articles had an impact on the scientific and health community the ripples of which are still being felt today. To commemorate the anniversary of this important event, Science has collaborated with the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Institute of Human Virology, and the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, to bring you this educational booklet. It collects in one place not only those first four seminal papers, but also a series of original essays from thought leaders in the field of HIV/AIDS research, some of whom worked with Dr. Gallo in his laboratory at NCI when the first retroviruses were discovered. Following the Science papers, accounts from Wiltrout and Niederhuber, as well as ex-director of NCI, Samuel Broder, lay out NCI’s role in AIDS research, from discovery of HIV all the way to the current state of vaccine research; Anders Vahlne takes a slightly different tack on these early discoveries, seen from a more technical perspective. The remaining four essays delve deeper into the issue of HIV vaccines and the impact of the virus on cancer. Esparza, McCutchan, Lewis, and Gallo emphasize the importance of pursuing a vaccine for HIV, despite the recent setbacks, while Redfield and Blattner look at a broader landscape of therapies, taking the position that potential treatments are most likely to be found at the intersection of the virus with its host. Yarchoan and Pauza raise the specter of a growing incidence of cancer in the HIV-positive population as a side effect of increasingly effective antiretroviral treatment regimens. In the final essay, Schlom, Lowy, and Schiller pick up this theme, arguing that cancer vaccine research can inform us in the development of vaccines against HIV; further, HIV-related cancers may be valid targets for cancer vaccines. It is clear that, although progress has been made in the quarter century since the discovery of HIV, there is still much to be achieved. With the concerted effort to develop a vaccine, it seems likely that success will eventually, must eventually, be achieved. The questions, especially for those in developing nations who have limited access to antiretrovirals, are how soon can this happen and will the treatment be both affordable and effective? On May 4, 1984, Dr. Robert Gallo, currently the director of the Institute of Human Virology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, and his collaborators published a series of four remarkable papers in the journal Science, which demonstrated convincingly that a retrovirus they and others had isolated, called HTLVIII, was the cause of a new and deadly epidemic that was just beginning to sweep across the nation and the world: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or AIDS. A quarter century later, AIDS has killed millions of people worldwide. Currently an estimated 33 million people—roughly equal to the entire population of the state of California—are infected with HIV. Without Dr. Gallo’s contributions, that toll, as horrible as it is, undoubtedly would be much greater. The discovery of the cause of AIDS led not only to the development of an assay for detecting the virus in blood samples by Dr. Gallo’s group, but also to methods for keeping the viral infection under control. Today, with adequate intervention and therapy, HIV infection is a chronic, but survivable disease. The four original papers of Gallo and colleagues have been reprinted in this special Science booklet commemorating the 25th anniversary of their landmark discovery. The essays that follow, written by long-time collaborators and colleagues of Dr. Gallo, discuss the historical significance of his initial discoveries as well as their impact on the future course of the treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS. Dr. Gallo’s story is far from over, however. Not long after discovering the virus, he began devoting much of his career to caring for those infected with HIV and to preventing its spread to vulnerable populations. In 1996, he and two of his long-time scientific collaborators, Robert Redfield, M.D., and William Blattner, M.D., co-founded the Institute of Human Virology in partnership with the State of Maryland and the City of Baltimore. The institute’s mission was to create and develop a world-class center of excellence focusing on the treatment, prevention, and, ultimately, a cure for those with HIV/AIDS and other viral-related human diseases. In 2006, the institute became part of the University of Maryland School of Medicine, where it has continued to prosper and grow. Today, the institute has 220 full-time employees, including 45 faculty engaged in basic or clinical research on HIV/AIDS, other human viral diseases, and cancer. As one of the major partners in the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the institute currently delivers life-saving medications and therapies to more than 5,000 HIV-infected men, women, and children in Baltimore and almost a quarter million people living with HIV/AIDS at institutesupported clinics in Africa and the Caribbean. In July 2007, the institute was awarded a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for research into a preventive vaccine for HIV/AIDS and was recently selected as one of only 10 centers worldwide to be part of the NIH-sponsored HIV Vaccine Trials Network. Thus, it is now poised to play a significant role in accelerating the pace of HIV vaccine development. As we gather to celebrate and reflect on the 25th anniversary of Dr. Gallo’s historic breakthrough, we congratulate him not only for his initial scientific discoveries, but also his ongoing humanitarian efforts and his work to find an eventual vaccine—and cure— for one of the worst plagues in human history. Based on his past successes, we can only predict that his future and that of the institute will be every bit as accomplished. Sean Sanders, Ph.D. Commercial Editor, Science E. Albert Reece, M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A. Vice President for Medical Affairs, University of Maryland Bowers Distinguished Professor and Dean, University of Maryland School of Medicine Detection, Isolation, and Continuous Production of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and Pre-AIDS Mikulas Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, Elizabeth Read, Robert C. Gallo A cell system was developed for the reproducible detection of human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV family) from patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or with signs or symptoms that frequently precede AIDS (pre-AIDS). The cells are specific clones from a permissive human neoplastic T-cell line. Some of the clones permanently grow and continuously produce large amounts of virus after infection with cytopathic (HTLV-III) variants of these viruses. One cytopathic effect of HTLV-III in this system is the arrangement of multiple nuclei in a characteristic ring formation in giant cells of the infected T-cell population. These structures can be used as an indicator to detect HTLV-III in clinical specimens. This system opens the way to the routine detection of HTLV-III and related cytopathic variants of HTLV in patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS and in healthy carriers, and it provides large amounts of virus for detailed molecular and immunological analyses. E pidemiologic data suggest that the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is caused by an infectious agent that is horizontally transmitted by intimate contact or blood products (1-3). Though the disease is manifested by opportunistic infections, predominantly Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (4), and by Kaposi’s sarcoma (5), the underlying disorder affects the patient’s cell-mediated immunity (6), resulting in absolute lymphopenia and reduced subpopulations of helper T lymphocytes (OKT4+). Moreover, before a complete clinical manifestation of the disease occurs, its prodrome, pre-AIDS, is frequently characterized by unexplained chronic lymphadenopathy or leukopenia involving helper T lymphocytes (5, 6). This leads to the severe immune deficiency of the patient and suggests that a specific subset of T cells could be a primary target for an infectious agent. Although patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS are often chronically infected with cytomegalovi rus (7) or hepatitis B virus (8), for various reasons these appear to be opportunistic or coincidental infections. We have proposed that AIDS may be caused by a virus from the family of human T-cell lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV) (9) that includes two major, wellcharacterized subgroups of human retrovir uses, called human T-cell leukemia-lymphoma viruses, HTLV-I (9-12) and HTLV-II (9, 11, 13). The most common isolate, HTLV-I, is obtained mainly from patients with mature Tcell malignancies (9, 12). Seroepidemiological studies, the biological effects of the virus in vitro, and nucleic acid hybridization data indicate that HTLV-I is etiologically associated with the T-cell malignancy of adults that is endemic in certain areas of the south of Japan (14), the Caribbean (15), and Africa (16). HTLV-II was first isolated from a patient with a T-cell variant of hairy cell leukemia (13). To date, this is the only reported isolate of HTLV-II from a patient with a neoplastic disease. Virus isolation and seroepidemiological data show that both HTLV-I and HTLV-II can sometimes be found in patients with AIDS (17). That a retrovirus of the HTLV family might be an etiological agent of AIDS was suggested by the findings (i) that another retrovirus, feline leukemia virus, causes immune deficiency in cats (18); and that (ii) retroviruses of the HTLV family are T-cell tropic (12, 19); (iii) preferentially infect helper T cells (OKT4+) (12, 19); (iv) have cytopathic effects on various human and mammalian cells, as demonstrated by their induction of cell syncytia formation (20); (v) can alter some T-cell functions (21); (vi) can in some cases selectively kill T cells (22); and (viii) may be transmitted by intimate contact and blood products (9). Also consistent with an HTLV etiology were the results of Fig. 1. Light and electron microscopic examination of clone H4/HTLV-III. (a) H4/HTLV-III cells were characterized by the presence of large multinucleated cells that showed, with Wright-Giemsa staining, a characteristic arrangement of their nuclei (x350). (b) Electron micrograph of the cells showing the presence of extracellular viral particles (x60,000). Essex and Lee and their colleagues showing the presence of antibodies to cell membrane antigens of HTLV-infected cells in serum samples from more than 40 percent of patients with AIDS (23). This antigen has since been defined as part of the envelope of HTLV (24). The more frequent detection in AIDS patients of antibodies to a membrane protein rather than to HTLV-I internal structural core proteins (25), together with the low incidence of isolations of HTLV-I or HTLV-II from AIDS patients, also suggested that a new variant of HTLV might be present. The original detection and isolation of HTLV-I were made possible by the discovery of T-cell growth factor (TCGF) (26), also called interleukin 2 (IL-2), which stimulates the growth of different subsets of normal and neoplastic mature T cells (27), and by the development of sensitive assays for reverse transcriptase (RT), an enzyme characteristic of retroviruses (28). The procedures used previ ously for the transmission and continuous production of HTLV-I and -II were first worked out in mammalian cells transformed by avian sarcoma virus (29). These methods involved cocultivation of the transformed cells with cells permissive for the particular virus strain. Normal human T cells in cocultivation experiments preferentially yielded HTLV of both subgroups. Some of these viruses showed an immortalizing (transforming) capability for certain target T cells (9, 12). We thought that HTLV variants that have cytopathic effects on their target cells but do not immortalize them might be more important in the cause of AIDS. In fact, such variants were frequently but only transiently detected when normal T cells were used as targets in cocultivation or cell-free transmission experiments. This transience was our main obstacle to the isolation of these cytopathic variants of HTLV from patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS. We subsequently found a cell line that is highly susceptible to and permissive for cytopathic variants of HTLV. This cell line can grow permanently after infection with the virus. We report here the establishment and characterization of this new immortalized T-cell population and its use in the isolation and continuous high-level production of HTLV variants from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Several neoplastic human cell lines established in vitro were assayed for susceptibility to infection with HTLV-I and -II and with many of the more cytopathic retroviruses isolated from AIDS patients (30). One neoplastic aneuploid T-cell line, derived from an adult with lymphoid leukemia, was found to be susceptible to infection with the new cytopathic virus isolates. This cell line, termed HT, has produced HTLV-variants in sufficient quantities to permit the development of specific immunologic reagents and nucleic acid probes that can be used to characterize new isolates and compare them with HTLV-I and HTLV-II (30). These cytopathic variants differ from HTLV-I and -II not only in their biologi Table 1. Response of cloned T-cell populations to infection with HTLV-III. Single-cell clones were isolated as described (34, 35) from a long-term cultured aneuploid HT cell line exhibiting mature T-cell phenotype [OKT3+ (62 percent), OKT4+ (39 percent), and OKT8- ] as determined by cytofluorometry with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. The cultures are routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 20 percent fetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics. The terminal cell density of the parental cell culture, seeded at a concentration of 2 x 105 cells per milliliter of culture media, was in the range of 106 to 1.5 x 106 cells per milliliter after 5 days of culture. Fig. 2. (a) Continuous HTLV-III production from H4/HTLV-III in long-term culture was characterized by fluctuation in the amount of released virus as assessed by RT activity in the culture fluid (for details, see Table 1 and Fig. 2b). Viability of the infected cells was in the range of 60 to 90 percent, (b) Sucrose density gradient banding of HTLV-III showed the highest particulate RT activity at a density of 1.16 g/ml. A cell-free virus concentrate from a culture of H4/HTLV-III was layered on a 20 to 60 percent (by weight) sucrose gradient in 10 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 0.1M NaCl and 1 mM EDTA and centrifuged overnight at 35,000 rev/min in a Spinco SW47 rotor. Fractions of 0.7 ml were collected from the bottom of the gradient and portions were assayed for RT (•) with (dT)15 • (A)n being used as the primer template and Mg2+ as the divalent cation according to the methods described earlier (10, 28). Density of sucrose (X) was determined by refractive index measurements. *Cell smears were prepared from cultures 6 and 14 days after infection and stained with Wright-Giemsa. Cells with more than five nuclei were considered to be multinucleated. Cloned cells from uninfected cultures also contained some multinucleated giant cells; however, the arrangement of the multiple nuclei in a characteristic ring formation (see Fig. 1a) was lacking and the number of these cells was much less (0.7 to 10 percent). †Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in the same buffer at concentration 106 cells per milliliter. Approximately 50 µl of cell suspension was spotted on a slide, air dried, and fixed in acetone for 10 minutes at room temperature. Slides were stored at -20°C until use. Twenty microliters of either rabbit antiserum to HTLV-III (diluted 1:2000 in PBS) or serum from the patient (E.T.) diluted 1:8 in PBS was applied to cells and incubated for 50 minutes at 37°C. The fluorescein-conjugated antiserum to rabbit or human immunoglobulin G was diluted and applied to the fixed cells for 30 minutes at room temperature. Slides were then washed extensively before microscopic examinations. The uninfected parental cell line as well as the clones were consistently negative in these assays. ND, not done. ‡Virus particles were precipitated from cell-free supernatant as follows: 0.3 ml of 4M NaCl and 3.6 ml of 30 percent (weight to volume) polyethylene glycol (Carbowax 6000) were added to 8 ml of harvested culture fluids and the suspension was placed on ice overnight. The suspension was centrifuged in a Sorvall RC-3 centrifuge at 2000 rev/min at 4°C for 30 minutes. The precipitate was resuspended in 300 µl of 50 percent (by volume) glycerol (25 mM tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 150 mM KCl, and 0.025 percent Triton X-100). Virus particles were disrupted by addition of 100 µl of 0.9 percent Triton X-100 to 1.5M KCl. Reverse transcriptase assays were performed as previously described (10, 28) (see comments to Fig. 2b) and expressed in counts per minute per milliliter of culture medium. cal effects but also in several immunological assays and in their morphology (31). They nevertheless have many properties similar to HTLV-I and -II. For example, they are T4 lymphotropic, they have a similar RT (30), they cross-react with several structural proteins in heterologous radioimmune assays with serum from AIDS patients and with antisera to the virus raised in animals (31), and they induce syncytia. These new HTLV isolates are collec tively designated HTLV-III, although it is not yet proved that they are identical. The cell line HT was tested for HTLV before being infected in vitro and was negative by all criteria including lack of proviral sequences (32). Continuous production of HTLV-III was obtained after repeated exposure of parental HT cells (3 x 106 cells pretreated with polybrene) to concentrated culture fluids harvested from short-term cultures of T cells (grown with TCGF) obtained from patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS. The concentrated fluids were first shown to contain particle-associated RT. When cell proliferation declined, usually 10 to 20 days after exposure to the culture fluids, the fresh (uninfected) HT cells were added to the cultures. Culture fluids from the infected parental cell line were positive for particulate RT activity, and about 20 percent of the infected cell population was positive in an indirect immune fluorescence assay in which we used serum from a hemophilia patient with pre-AIDS (patient E.T.). Serum from E.T. also contained antibodies to proteins of disrupted HTLV-III (33) but did not react with cells infected with HTLV-I or HTLV-II. The parental T-cell population was ex tensively cloned in order to select the most permissive clones that would preserve high rates of growth and virus production (for example, see clones 4 and 9 in Table 1). A total of 51 single-cell clones were obtained by both capillary (34) and limited dilution (35) techniques using irradiated mononuclear cells from peripheral blood of a healthy donor as a feeder. The clones were infected with HTLVIII by exposure to concentrated virus (2 x 106 cells of each clone and 0.1 ml of virus). Then cell growth and morphology, expression of cellular viral antigens, and RT activity in culture fluids were assessed 6 and 14 days after infection. Results for eight of these clones are shown in Table 1. Although all of these clones were susceptible to and permissive for the virus, there were considerable differences in their ability to proliferate after infection. For example, the cell number decreased by 10 to 90 percent from the initial cell count within 6 days after infection. The percentage of T cells positive for viral antigens ranged from 10 to 80 percent, as determined by immune fluorescence assays with serum from patient E.T. and with antiserum from rabbits infected repeatedly with disrupted HTLV-III. At 14 days after infection, the total cell number and the proportion of HTLV-III positive cells had increased in all eight clones. The virus positive cultures consistently showed a high proportion of round giant cells containing numerous nuclei (Fig. la). These cells resemble those induced by HTLV-I and -II (9) except that the nuclei exhibit a characteristic ring formation. Electron microscopic examinations showed that the cells released considerable amounts of virus (Fig. lb). Both virus production and cell viability of the infected clone H4 (H4/HTLV-III) were monitored for several months. Although virus Table 2. Isolation of HTLV-III from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. *Cocultivation with H4 recipient T-cell clone was performed with fresh mononuclear cells from peripheral blood of patients R.F. and S.N., respectively. For patients B.K. and L.S. cocultivation was performed with T cells grown in the presence of exogenous TCGF (10 percent by volume) for 10 days. The ratio of recipient to donor (patients’) cells was 1:5. The mixed cultures were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (containing 20 percent FCS and antibiotics) in the absence of exogenous TCGF. H9 cells were also infected by exposing the cells to concentrated culture fluids harvested from T-cell cultures of patient W.T. The cultures were grown in the presence of exogenous TCGF for 2 weeks before the culture fluids were harvested and concentrated. Cells of H9 clones were treated with polybrene (2 µg/ml) for 20 minutes and 2 x 106 cells were exposed for 1 hour to 0.5 ml of 100-fold concentrated culture fluids positive for particulate RT activity. †HTLV-III virus expression in cells infected by the coculture and cell-free methods was assayed approximately 1 month after cultivation in vitro. Note a considerable fluctuation in HTLV-III expression. For details of the RT and indirect immune fluorescence assays see Table 1. production fluctuated (Fig. 2a), culture fluids harvested and assayed at approximately 14day intervals consistently showed particulate RT activity which has been followed for over 5 months. The viability of the cells, ranged from 65 to 85 percent and the doubling time of the cell population was approximately 30 to 40 hours (data not shown). Thus the data show that this permanently growing T-cell population can continuously produce HTLV-III. The yield of virus from H4/HTLV-III cells was assessed by purification of concentrated culture fluids through a sucrose density gradient and assays of particulate RT activity in each fraction collected from the gradient. As shown in Fig. 2b, the highest RT activity was found at a density of 1.16 g/ml, which is similar to other retroviruses. The highest RT activity was found in the fractions with the largest amount of virus, as determined by electron microscopy. The actual number of viral particles determined by this method was estimated (36) to be about 1011 per liter of culture fluid. We have used clones H4 and H9 for the long-term propagation of HTLV-III from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. HTLV-III was isolated from four patients by the cocultivation method and from one patient by cell-free infection of these T-cell clones (Table 2). The transmission was monitored by RT activity, electron microscopic examinations, and expression of viral protein. When the H4 cells thus infected were fixed with acetone and tested with rabbit antiserum to HTLV-III and with serum from patients E.T., the percentage of positive cells was between 5 and 80 percent. HTLV-III has also been isolated in our laboratory from a total of 48 patients by the more conventional methods for isolation of HTLV (30). Some of these isolates have now successfully been transmitted to the HT clones for production and detailed analyses. A few T-lymphocyte retroviruses that differed from HTLV-I and -II but were associated with lymphadenopathy syndrome were detected earlier (37, 38). One such virus, called LAV, was reported to be unrelated to HTLVI or -II (38). Moreover, serum samples from 37.5 percent of patients with AIDS were found to react with it (38). In contrast, HTLV-III is related to HTLV-I and -II (31, 39) and, by all criteria, this new virus belongs to the HTLV family of retroviruses. In addition, more than 85 percent of serum samples from AIDS patients are reactive with proteins of HTLV-III (33). These findings suggest that HTLV-III and LAV may be different. However, it is possible that this is due to insufficient characterization of LAV because the virus has not yet been transmitted to a permanently growing cell line for true isolation and therefore has been difficult to obtain in quantity. The transient expression of cytopathic variants of HTLV in cells from AIDS patients and the previous lack of a cell system that could maintain growth and still be susceptible to and permissive for the virus represented a major obstacle in detection, isolation, and elucidation of the precise causative agent of AIDS. The establishment of T-cell populations that continuously grow and produce virus after infection opens the way to the routine detection of cytopathic variants of HTLV in AIDS patients and provides the first opportunity for detailed immu nological (31, 33) and molecular analyses of these viruses. References and Notes 1. Centers for Disease Control Task Force on Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections, N. Engl J. Med. 306, 248 (1982). 2. J. P. Hanrahan, G. P. Wormser, C. P. Maguire, L. J. DeLorenzo, G. Davis, ibid. 307, 498 (1982). 3. J. W. Curran et al., ibid. 310, 69 (1984). 4. “Pneumocystis pneumonia—Los Angeles,” Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 30, 250 (1981). 5. “Kaposi’s sarcoma and pneumocystis pneumonia among homosexual men—New York City and California,” ibid., p. 305; A. E. Friedman-Klein et al., Ann. Int. Med. 96, 693 (1982). 6. M. Gottlieb et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 305, 1425 (1981); J. Masur et al., ibid., p. 1431. 7. C. Urmacher, P. Myskowski, M. Ochoa, M. Kris, B. Safai, Am. J. Med. 72, 569 (1982). 8. D. R. Francis and J. E. Maynard, Epidemiol. Rev. 1, 17 (1979); N. Clumeck et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 310, 492 (1984). 9. R. C. Gallo, in Cancer Surveys, L. M. Franks, L. M. Wyke, R. A. Weiss, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, in press). 10. B. J. Poiesz et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7415 (1980); M. Yoshida, I. Miyoshi, Y. Hinuma, ibid. 79, 2031 (1982). 11. M. S. Reitz, M. Popovic, B. F. Haynes, S. C. Clark, R. C. Gallo, Virology 26, 688 (1983). 12. M. Popovic, et al., Science 219, 856 (1983). 13. V. S. Kalyanaraman et al., ibid 218, 571 (1982). 14. Y. Hinuma et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 6476 (1981); M. Robert-Guroff et al.., Science 215, 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 975 (1982); V. S. Kalyanaraman et al.., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 1653 (1982). W. A. Blattner et al., Int. J. Cancer 30, 257 (1982). W. C. Saxinger et al., in Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses, R. C. Gallo, M. Essex, L. Gross, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., in press). R. C. Gallo et al., Science 220, 865 (1983); E. P. Gelmann et al., ibid., p. 862; M. Popovic et al., in preparation. M. Essex, W. D. Hardy, Jr., S. M. Cotter, R. M. Jakowski, A. Sliski, Infect. Immun. 11, 470 (1975); W. D. Hardy, Jr., et al., Cancer Res. 36, 582 (1976); L. J. Anderson, O. Jarret, H. M. Laird, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 47, 807 (1971). R. C. Gallo et al., Cancer Res. 43, 3892 (1983); F. Wong-Staal et al., Nature (London) 302, 626 (1983). K. Nagy, P. Clapham, R. Cheinsong-Popov, R. A. Weiss, Int. J. Cancer 32, 321 (1983). M. Popovic et al., in preparation. H. Mitsuya, H. G. Guo, M. Megson, C. D. Trainor, M. S. Reitz, S. Broder, Science 223, 1293 (1984). M. Essex et al., ibid. 220, 859 (1983). J. Schüpbach, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, ibid., in press; T. H. Lee et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., in press. M. Robert-Guroff et al., in preparation. D. A. Morgan, F. W. Ruscetti, R. C. Gallo, Science 193, 1007 (1976). F. W. Ruscetti, D. A. Morgan, R. C. Gallo, J. Immunol. 119, 131 (1977); B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, J. W. Mier, A. M. Woods, R. C. Gallo, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6134 (1980). R. C. Gallo, F. W. Ruscetti, R. E. Gallagher, in Hematopoietic Mechanisms, B. Clarkson, P. A. Marks, J. Till, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1978), vol. 5, p. 671. J. Svoboda, Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr. 17, 277 (1964); J. Svoboda and R. Dourmashkin, J. Gen. Virol. 4, 523 (1969); M. Popovic, J. Svoboda, J. Suni, A. Vaheri, L. Ponten, Int. J. Cancer 19, 834 (1977); M. Popovic, J. Svoboda, F. L. Kisselyov, K. Polakova, Folia Biol. 26, 244 (1980). R. C. Gallo et al., Science 224, 500 (1984). J. Schüpbach, M. Popovic, R. V. Gilden, M. A. Gonda, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, ibid. 224, 503 (1984). G. Shaw and F. Wong-Staal, unpublished data. M. G. Sarngadharan, M. Popovic, L. Bruch, J. Schüpbach, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 506 (1984). M. Popovic, M. Grofova, N. Valentova, D. Simkovic, Neoplasma 18, 257 (1971). H. F. Bach, B. J. Alter, B. M. Widmer, M. S. Segall, D. Dunlap, Immunol Rev. 54, 5 (1981). J. H. Monroe and P. M. Brandt, Appl. Microbiol. 20, 259 (1970). F. Barré-Sinoussi et al., Science 220, 868 (1983). L. Montagnier et al., in Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses, R. C. Gallo, M. Essex, L. Gross, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., in press). S. Arya et al., in preparation. We thank B. Kramarsky for help in electron microscopic examination of HTLV-III infected cells, E. Richardson and R. Zicht for technical help, and A. Mazzuca for her editorial assistance. 30 March 1984; accepted 19 April 1984 Frequent Detection and Isolation of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and at Risk for AIDS Robert C. Gallo, Syed Z. Salahuddin, Mikulas Popovic, Gene M. Shearer, Mark Kaplan, Barton F. Haynes, Thomas J. Palker, Robert Redfield, James Oleske, Bijan Safai, Gilbert White, Paul Foster, Phillip D. Markham Peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or with signs or symptoms that frequently precede AIDS (pre-AIDS) were grown in vitro with added T-cell growth factor and assayed for the expression and release of human Tlymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV). Retroviruses belonging to the HTLV family and collectively designated HTLV-III were isolated from a total of 48 subjects including 18 of 21 patients with pre-AIDS, three of four clinically normal mothers of juveniles with AIDS, 26 of 72 adult and juvenile patients with AIDS, and from one of 22 normal male homosexual subjects. No HTLVIII was detected in or isolated from 115 normal heterosexual subjects. The number of HTLV-III isolates reported here underestimates the true prevalence of the virus since many specimens were received in unsatisfactory condition. Other data show that serum samples from a high proportion of AIDS patients contain antibodies to HTLV-III. That these new isolates are members of the HTLV family but differ from the previous isolates known as HTLV-I and HTLV-II is indicated by their morphological, biological, and immunological characteristics. These results and those reported elsewhere in [the 4 May 1984 issue of Science] suggest that HTLV-III may be the primary cause of AIDS. T he acquired immunodeficiency syn drome known as AIDS was initially recognized as a separate disease entity in 1981 (1). Groups reported to be at risk for AIDS include homosexual or bisexual males (about 70 percent of reported cases), intravenous drug users (about 17 percent of cases), and Haitian immigrants to the United States (about 5 percent of cases). Also at risk are heterosexual contacts of members of the highest risk group, hemophiliacs treated with blood products pooled from donors, recipients of multiple blood transfusions, and infants born of parents belonging to the high-risk groups (2). AIDS is diagnosed as a severe, unexplained, immune deficiency that usually involves a reduction in the number of helper T lymphocytes and is accompanied by multiple opportunistic infections or malignancies. A number of other clinical manifestations, when occurring in members of a group at risk for AIDS, are identified as its prodrome (preAIDS). These include unexplained chronic lymphadenopathy or leukopenia involving a reduction in the number of helper T lymphocytes (1, 2). The increasing incidence of this disease, the types of patients affected, and 10 other epidemiological data suggest the exist ence of an infectious etiologic agent that can be transmitted by intimate contact or by whole blood or separated blood components (2). As indicated by Popovic et al. (3), we and others have suggested that specific human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV) cause AIDS (4, 5). Many properties of HTLV are consistent with this idea (6). An association of members of the HTLV family with T lymphocytes from some AIDS or pre-AIDS patients was reported previously. For example, the first subgroup of HTLV to be characterized, HTLV-I, was isolated recently from T cells from about 10 percent of AIDS patients, and a virus related to HTLV-II was isolated from one AIDS patient (4). Another HTLV isolate was obtained from the lymph nodes of a patient with lymphadenopathy and at risk for AIDS (7). This isolate has been difficult to grow in quantities sufficient to permit its characterization. HTLV proviral DNA was detected in T lymphocytes from two additional AIDS patients (8) and HTLV-related antigens were found in another two patients (4). Studies in which disrupted HTLV-I or the purified structural proteins (p24 or p19) Fig. 1. Reverse transcriptase activity from lymphocytes established in cell culture from a patient with preAIDS. Viable cell number and Mg2+-dependent RT activity were determined by established procedures (13). Symbols: º, viable cell number in 1.5 ml of growth medium; •, RT in 5 μl of fivefold concentrated conditioned medium sam pled at the indicated time. A sudden vertical drop in the dashed curve indicates the time of subculturing of cells to the indicated cell number. Arrow indicates the time of addition of rabbit antiserum to α-interferon to a portion of the cultured cells (also see legend to Table 1). were used to detect antibodies in serum sam ples from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS indicated that 10 to 15 percent of the patients had been exposed to HTLV-I (9). Essex and his co-workers, using HTLV-infected T-lymphocyte cultures to detect antibody in serum samples, found that about 35 percent of patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS had been ex posed to HTLV (5). Further studies suggested that at least some of the antigens detected in this system were products of the genome of a member of the HTLV family (10), but it was not known whether the antibodies were specifically against HTLV-I, HTLV-II, or a virus of a different subgroup. With the availability of large quantities of HTLV-III (3), it became possible to develop specific immunological reagents that would facilitate its characterization. HTLV-III was found to share many properties with other HTLV isolates (6), but it was morphologically, biologically, and antigenically distinguishable (3, 11). Here we describe the detection and isolation of HTLV-III from a large number of patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. For these studies we used cell culture conditions previously developed in our laboratory for the establishment of T lymphocytes in culture and for the detection and isolation of HTLV-I and HTLV-II from leukemic donors (12). Evidence for the presence of HTLV-III included: (i) viral reverse transcriptase (RT) activity (12) in supernatant fluids; (ii) trans mission of virus by coculturing T cells with ir- radiated donor cells or with cell-free fluids (3, 13); (iii) observation of virus by electron microscopy (12, 13); and (iv) the expression of viral antigens in indirect immune fluorescence assays using serum from a patient positive for antibodies to HTLV-III as described (5, 11), or antisera prepared against purified, whole disrupted HTLV-III (11). Cells and supernatant fluids were also monitored for the expression of HTLV-I and HTLV-II by using antibodies to the viral structural proteins pl9 and p24 and by indirect immune fluorescence and radioimmunoprecipitation procedures (14). As summarized in Table 1, we found HTLVIII in 18 of 21 samples from patients with preAIDS, from three of four clinically normal mothers of juvenile AIDS patients, three of eight juvenile AIDS patients, 13 of 43 adult AIDS patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma, and 10 of 21 adult AIDS patients with opportunistic infections. Virus was detected in only one of 22 samples from clinically normal, nonpromiscuous homosexual males believed to be at only moderate risk for AIDS. It is interesting, however, that 6 months after these tests were conducted the one positive normal homosexual subject developed AIDS. In no instance, 0 of 115, was virus detected in or isolated from cells of the normal volunteers. Samples from 15 of these were tested under rigorously controlled conditions, which included addition of antibody to a-interferon. Primary cells from patients usually produce virus for 2 to 3 weeks (Fig. 1). After this time 11 Fig. 2. Transmission electron micrographs of fixed, sectioned lymphocytes from a patient with pre-AIDS. (A) x 10,000; (B) x 30,000; (C and D) x 100,000. Table 1. Detection and isolation of HTLV-III from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Peripheral blood leukocytes were banded in Ficoll-Hypaque, incubated in growth medium (RPMI 1640, 20 percent fetal bovine serum, and 0.29 mg of glutamine per milliliter) containing phytohemagglutinin (PHA-P; 5 μg/ml) for 48 hours at 37°C in a 5 percent C02 atmosphere. They were then refed with growth medium containing 10 percent purified T-cell growth factor (TCGF). Cells and conditioned media from these lymphocytes were assayed for the presence of HTLV-III. Samples exhibiting more than one of the following were considered positive: repeated detection of a Mg2+-dependent reverse transcriptase activity in supernatant fluids; virus observed by electron microscopy; intracellular expression of virus-related antigens detected with antibodies from seropositive donors or with rabbit antiserum to HTLV-III; or transmission of particles, detected by RT assays or by electron microscopic observation, to fresh human cord blood, bone marrow, or peripheral blood T lymphocytes. All isolates are distinguishable from HTLV-I or HTLV-II by several criteria and are classified as HTLV-III on the basis of similar morphological features observed by electron microscopy (Fig. 1); similar cytopathic effects (3); antigenic cross-reactivity (11); and nucleic acid analysis (16). *With the exception of the normal heterosexual donors and some of the clinically normal mothers of juvenile AIDS patients, all others belong to one of the groups of people identified as being at risk for AIDS (homosexual males, intravenous drug users, Haitian immigrants, heterosexual contacts of members of a group at risk, hemophiliacs treated with pooled blood products, recipients of multiple blood transfusions, and infants born of parents belonging to other groups at risk). Pre-AIDS includes patients with unexplained chronic lymphadenopathy and leukopenia, with an inverted T4 (helper)/T8 (suppressor) lymphocyte ratio. The clinically normal, nonpromiscuous, homosexual subjects are from Washington, D.C, and are believed to be at moderate risk. The clinically normal heterosexual donors include both male and female subjects believed not to be at risk for AIDS. 12 the production of virus declines even though the culture may contain actively replicating cells that can be maintained for long periods in the presence of added T-cell growth factor (TCGF). In some instances virus release can be reinitiated by the addition of antibody to αinterferon (Fig. 1). The HTLV-III–producing cell cultures were characterized by established immunological procedures (13). They were predominantly T lymphocytes (E rosette recep tor–positive, OKT3+ and Leul+) with a helperinducer phenotype (OKT4+ and Leu3+). The fairly uniform morphological ap pearance of HTLV-III is shown in Fig. 2. The diameter of the virus is 100 to 120 nm, and it is produced in high numbers from infected cells by budding from the cell membrane. A possibly unique feature of this virus is the cylindrical shaped core observed in many mature virions. The incidence of virus isolation reported here probably underestimates its true incidence since many tissue specimens were not received or handled under what we now recognize as optimal conditions (15). This is particularly so for the samples received from late-stage AIDS patients. Such samples usually contain many dying cells and very few viable T4 lymphocytes. However, a high proportion of patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS have circulating antibody to HTLV-III (11). The HTLV-III produced by cultured T cells from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS is highly infectious and can be readily transmitted to fresh umbilical cord blood and adult peripheral blood or bone marrow lymphocytes. The production of HTLV-III by these cells is transient, often declining to undetectable levels by 2 to 3 weeks after infection (data not shown). The transmission of HTLV-III to an established T-cell line (3), however, now makes possible its production in large quantities for detailed analyses and for development of reagents for its detection (3, 11). That the viruses we have named HTLV-III belong to the HTLV family is indicated by their T cell tropism, Mg2+-dependent RT of high molecular weight, antigenic cross-reactivity with HTLV-I and -II (11), cytopathic effects on T lymphocytes (3), and their morphological appearance in the electron micrograph. HTLV-III also contains some structural proteins similar in size to those of other members of the HTLV family (11). These studies of HTLV-III isolates from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS and from some healthy individuals at risk for AIDS provide strong evidence of a causative involvement of the virus in AIDS. References and Notes Schüpbach, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 506 (1984); J. Schüpbach et al., ibid., p. 503. 12. B. J. Poiesz et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7415 (1980); B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, M. S. Reitz, V. S. Kalyanaraman, R. C. Gallo, Nature (London) 294, 268 (1981); V. S. Kalyanaraman et al., Science 218, 571 (1982). 13. P. D. Markham et al., Int. J. Cancer 31, 413 (1983); P. D. Markham, S. Z. Salahuddin, B. Macchi, M. Robert-Guroff, R. C. Gallo, ibid. 35, 13 (1984); S. Z. Salahuddin et al., Virology 129, 51 (1983). 14. M. Robert-Guroff and R. C. Gallo, Blut 47, 1 (1983); V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, R. C. Gallo, J. Virol. 81, 906 (1981); C. Saxinger and R. C. Gallo, Lab. Invest. 49, 371 (1983). 15. For virus isolation, samples of freshly drawn, heparinized peripheral blood or bone marrow, yielding a minimum of 107 viable cells (greater than 90 percent), are needed. These samples must contain the cells of interest, namely, OKT4+ T cells, which are frequently depleted in AIDS patients. 16. S. Arya et al., in preparation. 17. We thank M. Gonda for electron microscopy and A. Patel, S. Roberson, A. Fladager, and E. Reid for technical assistance. We are also indebted to many clinical collaborators who provided patient materials. 1. M. S. Gottlieb et al., N. Eng. J. Med. 305, 1425 (1981); H. Masur et al., ibid., p. 1431; F. P. Siegal et al., ibid., p. 1439. 2. Centers for Disease Control, Morbid. Mortal, Week. Rpt. 32, 688 (1984); J. W. Curran et al., New Eng. J. Med. 310, 69 (1984); G. B. Scott, B. E. Buck, J. G. Letterman, F. L. Bloom, W. P. Parks, ibid., p. 76; J. Oleske et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc. 249, 2345 (1983). 3. M. Popovic et al., Science 224, 497 (1984). 4. R. C. Gallo et al., ibid. 220, 865 (1983); M. Popovic and R. C. Gallo, in preparation. 5. M. Essex et al., Science 220, 859 (1983); M. Essex et al., in Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses, R. C. Gallo, M. Essex, L. Gross, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., in press), 6. R. C. Gallo et al., Cancer Res. 43, 3892 (1983); in Cancer Surveys, L. M. Franks et al., Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, in press). 7. F. Barré-Sinoussi et al., Science 220, 868 (1983). 8. E. P. Gelmann et al., ibid., p. 862. 9. M. Robert-Guroff et al., in Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses, R. C. Gallo, M. Essex, L. Gross, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., in press). 10. T. H. Lee et al., personal communication; J. Schüpbach, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, in preparation. 11. M. G. Sarngadharan, M. Popovic, L. Bruch, J. 30 March 1984; accepted 19 April 1984 13 Serological Analysis of a Subgroup of Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) Associated with AIDS Jörg Schüpbach, Mikulas Popovic, Raymond V. Gilden, Matthew A. Gonda, M. G. Sarngadharan, Robert C. Gallo The two main subgroups of the family of human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV) that have previously been characterized are known as HTLV-I and HTLV-II. Both are associated with certain human leukemias and lymphomas. Cell surface antigens (p6I and p65) encoded by HTLV-I are frequently recognized, at low titers, by antibodies in the serum of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or with signs or symptoms that precede AIDS (pre-AIDS). This suggests an involvement of HTLV in these disorders. Another subgroup of HTLV, designated HTLV-III, has now been isolated from many patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. In the studies described in this report, virus-associated antigens in T-cell clones permanently producing HTLV-III were subjected to biochemical and immunological analyses. Antigens of HTLV-III, specifically detected by antibodies in serum from AIDS or pre-AIDS patients and revealed by the Western blot technique, are similar in size to those found in other subgroups of HTLV. They include at least three serologically unrelated antigenic groups, one of which is associated with groupspecific antigens (p55 and p24) and another with envelope-related (p65) proteins, while the antigens in the third group are of unknown affiliation. The data show that HTLV-III is clearly distinguishable from HTLV-I and HTLV-II but is also significantly related to both viruses. HTLV-III is thus a true member of the HTLV family. M embers of the family of human lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV) have the following features in common: a pronounced tropism for OKT4+ lymphocytes (1), a reverse transcriptase (RT) with a high molecular weight (100,000) and a preference for Mg2+ as the divalent cation for optimal enzymatic activity (2, 3), and the capacity to inhibit T cell function (4) or, in some cases, kill T cells (5). Many HTLV also have the capacity to transform infected T cells (1). The two major subgroups that have been characterized (6) are HTLV-I, which is causatively linked to certain adult T-cell malignancies (7), and HTLVII, which was first identified in a patient with hairy cell leukemia (8). Viruses of the HTLV family have been detected in some patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (9) or with pre-AIDS, a condition frequently progressing to AIDS (10). A high proportion of patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS, as well as a significant number of hemophiliacs, have antibodies in their serum that recognize a cell surface glycoprotein (gp61) that is present on certain human T cells infected with HTLV-I (11). Gp61 and p65, a slightly larger protein that is 14 a homolog of gp61 and occurs in another cell line producing HTLV-I, were subsequently shown to be related to the HTLV viral glycoprotein (12, 13). Studies of blood transfusion recipients who later developed AIDS and of their blood donors have revealed the presence, in the blood of the donors, of antibodies to a retrovirus of the HTLV family (14). These findings suggest an involvement of viruses of the HTLV family in the cause of AIDS and pre-AIDS. An involvement of HTLV-I alone appeared doubtful, however, because antibody titers to gp61 of HTLV-I in these patients are generally very low and antibodies to the structural proteins of HTLV, notably p24 and pl9 (15), are not detectable in most AIDS patients (16). Instead, it seemed likely that another member of the HTLV family might be involved in the etiology of AIDS. Here we describe our studies of a group of cytopathic viruses (collectively designated HTLV-III) isolated from patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS. Isolation of these viruses was achieved by means of a novel system permitting the continuous growth of T-cell clones infected with the cytopathic types of HTLV found in these disorders (17). We show that antigens associated with human Fig. 1 (top). Serologic detection of antigens in HTLV-III producer cell clones. Strip RIA were performed with human serum as described elsewhere in detail (21). Briefly, lysates of HTLV-III producer cell clones were subjected to electrophoresis under reducing conditions on preparative sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–polyacrylamide slab gels, and electroblotted to nitrocellulose sheets (18). The sheets were cut into strips. These were incubated with human serum diluted 1:100. After three thorough washings, bound antibodies of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) classes were made visible with radiolabeled, affinity-purified goat antiserum to human IgG and IgM (H-chain specific) and autoradiography. (A) Analysis with H4/HTLV-III cells. (Lanes a, d, and g) U.S. patients with AIDS; (lane b) a French heterosexual male who developed AIDS after receiving a blood transfusion in Haiti (24); (lane c) an AIDS patient from Switzerland; (lane e) a normal heterosexual control; (lane f) a French pre-AIDS patient (24); (lane h) a Swiss heterosexual drug addict; (lane i) a normal homosexual control. (B) Analysis with H17/HTLV-III cells. (Lane a) An infant with AIDS whose mother is a prostitute; sera from both are highly positive for antibodies to the HTLV membrane antigen (11, 25) and in our ELISA with disrupted HTLV-III (19); (lane b) same serum as in (A), lane d; (lane c) normal heterosexual control; (lane d) another Swiss AIDS patient; (lane e) a Swiss heterosexual male intravenous drug abuser with generalized lymphadenopathy and thrombocytopenic purpura (pre-AIDS). Fig. 2 (bottom). (A) Specificity of the antigens recognized. Lysates of cloned cells before and after infection with HTLV-III were analyzed by the Western blot technique (18) with a 1:500 dilution of the serum shown in Fig. IB, lane e. (Lane a) The H17 clone before and (lane b) the same clone after infection (H17/HTLV-III); (lane c) the H4 clone before and (lane d) the same clone after infection (H4/HTLV-III). All reactive antigens are virus-related with the exception of that with a molecular weight of 80,000 in H17 cells; this antigen binds antibodies from all human sera investigated. Normal human serum did not bind to any of the virus-related bands (not shown). (B) Comparison of antigens in (lanes a) cells and (lanes b) virus. Lysates of H4/HTLV-III (250 µg per lane) or virus purified from the cell culture fluids (19) (5 µg per lane) were analyzed with 1:500 dilutions of human sera. (Panel I) Same serum as in Fig. 2A; (panel II) serum of a Swiss male homosexual with fatigue and generalized lymphadenopathy (pre-AIDS); (panel III) serum from same AIDS patient as in Fig. IB, lane d. An antigen with a molecular weight of 110,000 and p41, p39, and p24 are enriched in the virus preparation [see (20)]. The serum in panel III recognized a subset of the antigens recognized by the sera used in panels I and II. cells infected by HTLV-III are specifically recognized by antibodies in serum from AIDS and pre-AIDS patients, and present a preliminary biochemical and immunological analysis of these antigens. Lysates of two immortalized and infected human T-cell clones, H4/HTLV-III and H17/ HTLV-III (17), were tested with samples of human serum in a strip radioimmunoassay (RIA) based on the Western blot technique (18). The sera were from patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS, from contacts of such patients, and from homo- or heterosexual male controls. Sera from the same patients were also tested by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with purified HTLV-III as part 15 Fig. 3. Relation between HTLV-III and HTLV-II. Serum of an AIDS patient at a dilution of 1:500 was tested in a competition RIA on strips (20) prepared with H4/HTLV-III cells. (Lane a) The human serum was added directly to the strip (uncompeted con trol); (lanes b to e) the serum was first absorbed for 3 hours at 37°C with 1 mg of cellular extract. In (b) the absorption was with uninfected H4 cells (not producing virus); in (c) the absorption was with H4/HTLV-III cells producing HTLV-III (positive control); in (d) the absorption was with C3/44 cells (26) producing HTLV-II; in (e) the absorption was with HUT 102 cells producing HTLV-I (2). of a larger, systematic serologic study of the prevalence of antibodies to HTLV-III in AIDS and pre-AIDS patients (19). Representative results are shown in Fig. 1. Sera from patients with AIDS or pre-AIDS, and from some homosexuals and heroin-addicts, recognized a number of specific antigens not detected by sera from heterosexual subjects. The most prominent reactions were with antigens of the following molecular weights: 65,000, 60,000, 55,000, 41,000, and 24,000. Antigens with molecular weights of approximately 88,000, 80,000, 39,000, 32,000, 28,000, and 21,000 gave less prominent reactions. The reaction with the antigen of 55,000 (p55) only occurred in sera that also recognized p24, suggesting a relationship between the two antigens. The specificity of these reactions was studied by comparing lysates of H4/HTLV-III and H17/HTLV-III with lysates of the same cell clones, H4 and H17, before viral infection (Fig. 2A). No antigen from the uninfected clones reacted with the sera, with the excep16 tion of a protein with a molecular weight of 80,000 in Hl7 which bound antibodies from all of the human serum samples tested (see Fig. 1B) but not from rabbit or goat serum. Antigens newly expressed after viral infection and recognized by the human serum used for this analysis included p65, p55, p41, p39, p32, and p24. A large protein with a molecular weight of approximately 130,000 and a protein of 48,000 were also detected. With this serum, p55 consistently appeared as a doublet of bands of similar intensity. With normal human serum, none of the antigens was detected (not shown). These results show clearly that the antigens detected after virus infection are either virus-coded proteins or cellular antigens specifically induced by the infection. The antigens of H4/HTLV-III were also compared with antigens from virus purified from the culture fluids of H4/HTLV-III (Fig. 2B). Extensive accumulation of p24 and p41 [see (20)] occurred in the virus preparation (Fig. 2B, panels I and II). Protein stains showed that these molecules are the major components of the virus preparation (19). P24 and p41 may therefore be considered viral structural proteins. Furthermore, an antigen with a molecular weight of approximately 110,000 was detected in the virus preparation but was below limit of detection in the cells. Also, p39 [see (20)] was present in the virus preparation. It is interesting that p24 in the virus preparation consistently appeared as a doublet (p24/p23), whereas in the cells it ap peared as p24 alone. The significance of this is under investigation. P55 was not detected in the virus; however, the intensity of the p55 band in the cells (Fig. 2B, lanes a) appeared to correlate with the intensity of p24/p23 in the virus preparation (Fig. 2B, lanes b), thus again suggesting a relation between these antigens. The p55 is probably a precursor of p24, since a group-specific antigen of similar size (Pr 54gag) in HTLV-I–infected cells is the precursor of p24 and the other gag-coded proteins (21). Occasionally an additional set of antigens was recognized by a serum (Fig. 2B, panel III) but their relation to the antigens described above is unclear. Thus we have shown that viral or virusinduced antigens in cloned human T cells infected with HTLV-III are specifically recognized by antibodies in the serum of patients Fig. 4. Electron microscopy of thin sections of cells producing HTLV-I, -II, and -III. (Top) HUT 102 cells producing HTLV-I (2). (Middle) Cells from an AIDS patient (J.P.) producing HTLV-II (24). (Bottom) Cells from a patient [described in (27)] with pre-AIDS, producing HTLV-III. (Panels a) Virus particles budding from the cell membrane. (Panels b) Free particles have separated from the membrane. (Panels c) Free particles sectioned in a different plane. Note the dense, cylindrical core region of HTLV-III. with AIDS or pre-AIDS. The detection of p65 by many of the serum samples is of special interest. We have tested these sera on strips pre pared from lysates of cells producing HTLV-I or -II. Some of these cells produce a p65 that has been shown (13) to be coded for by the env gene of HTLV-I and to be the homolog of the gp61 described by others (11, 12). Many of the sera recognizing p65 in HTLV-III–infected cells also recognized, though somewhat faintly, p65 in cells producing HTLV-I or –II, and some of them also recognized gag-related antigens (data not shown). In addition, the reaction of some human sera with virus-related antigens of HTLV-III–infected cells could be partially inhibited by large amounts of extracts of cells producing HTLVII (Fig. 3). When a human serum not recognizing p65 was used, the antigens for which there was competition included p55, p48, p4l, p39, and p24. These results were confirmed by the demonstration that a rabbit antiserum raised against purified HTLV-III showed some reactivity with antigens of HTLV-II and, to a lesser extent, with HTLV-I. In contrast, anti serum to HTLV-II recognized both HTLV-I and -III antigens, and an antiserum to HTLVI reacted well with HTLV-II, but only faintly with HTLV-III (22). Moreover, nucleotide sequences of HTLV-III have been found to be related to HTLV-I and -II (23). Although the morphology of HTLV-III particles appears to be somewhat different from the morphology of HTLV-I and -II (Fig. 4) , and although some differences are also found in the protein patterns of purified virus preparations (19), these immunological and nucleic acid data clearly indicate that HTLV-III is a true member of the HTLV family and that it is more closely related to HTLV-II than to HTLV-I. References and Notes 1. M. Popovic, P. S. Sarin, M. Robert-Guroff, V. S. Kalyanaraman, D. Mann, J. Minowada, R. C. Gallo, Science 219, 856 (1983); P. D. Markham, S. Z. Salahuddin, V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. Popovic, P. Sarin, R. C Gallo, Int. J. Cancer 31, 413 (1983); S. Z. Salahuddin, P. D. Markham, F. Wong-Staal, G. Franchini, V. S. Kalyanaraman, R. C Gallo, Virology 129, 51 (1983). 2. B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, A. F. Gazdar, P. A. Bunn, J. D. Minna, R. C. Gallo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7415 (1980). 3. H. M. Rho, B. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, R. C Gallo, Virology 112, 355 (1981); M. Seiki, S. Hattori, Y. Hirayama, M. Yoshida, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 3618 (1983). 4. M. Popovic et al., in preparation. 5. H. Mitsuya, H. G. Guo, M. Megson, C. O. Trainor, M. S. Reitz, S. Broder, Science 223, 1293 (1984). 6. For a brief review, see M. G. Sarngadharan et al., in Human Carcinogenesis, C. C. Harris and H. H. Autrup, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1983), p. 679. 7. V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, Y. Nakao, Y. Ito, T. Aoki, R. C. Gallo, Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 1653 (1982); M. Robert-Guroff, Y. Nakao, K. Notake, Y. Ito, A. H. Sliski, R. C. Gallo, Science 215, 925 (1982); Y. Hinuma et al., Int. J. Cancer 29, 631 (1982); W. A. Blattner et al., ibid. 30, 257 (1982); J. Schüpbach, V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, Y. Nakao, R. C. Gallo, ibid. 32, 583 (1983) ; J. Schüpbach, V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, W. A. Blattner, R. C. Gallo, Cancer Res. 43, 886 (1983). 8. V. S. Kalyanaraman et al., Science 218, 571 (1982); E. P. Gelmann et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 993 (1984). 17 9. R. C Gallo et al., Science 220, 865 (1983); E. P. Gelmann et al., ibid., p. 862. 10. F. Barré-Sinoussi et al, ibid., p. 868. 11. M. Essex et al., ibid., p. 859; M. Essex et al., ibid. 221, 1061 (1983). 12. T. H. Lee, J. E. Coligan, T. Homma, M. F. McLane, N. Tachibana, M. Essex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., in press. 13. J. Schüpbach, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, Science, in press. 14. H. W. Jaffe et al., Science 223, 1309 (1984). 15. V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, P. A. Bunn, J. D. Minna, R. C. Gallo, Nature (London) 294, 271 (1981); V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. Jarvis-Morar, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C Gallo, Virology 132, 61 (1984). 16. M. Robert-Guroff et al., in Cancer Cells, vol. 3, Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses, R. C Gallo and M. Essex, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., in press). 17. M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 497 (1984). 18. H. Towbin, T. Staehelin, J. Gordon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 4350 (1979). 19. M. G. Sarngadharan, M. Popovic, L. Bruch, J. Schüpbach, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 506 (1984). 20. Although in Fig. 2B the p41 in the virus preparation appears to be larger than the p41 in cells, the two molecules are of the same size. During application of the lysates to the gel in another experiment, a small amount of cellular lysate was spilled into the neighboring lanes and the cellular p41 moved with the same velocity as the viral p41. A connecting band was thus formed between the p41 in the lane containing the cells and the p41 in the lane with the virus. The same situation occurred with p39 in cells and virus. 21. J. Schüpbach, V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, in preparation. 22. M. G. Sarngadharan et al., in preparation. 23. S. Arya et al., in preparation. 24. J. B. Brunet et al., Lancet 1983-I, 700 (1983). 25. M. Essex, personal communication. 26. M. Popovic, V. S. Kalyanaraman, D. L. Mann, E. Richardson, P. S. Sarin, R. C. Gallo, in Cancer Cells, vol. 3, Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses, R. C. Gallo and M. Essex, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., in press). 27. R. C. Gallo et al., Science 224, 500 (1984). 28. We thank J. Ahmad for technical assistance and R. Lüthy and M. Vogt, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, and O. Haller, Institute for Immunology and Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, for making some sera from AIDS and pre-AIDS patients available and for providing clinical information. J.S. is a Fogarty International Fellow of the National Cancer Institute. 30 March 1984; accepted 19 April 1984 Antibodies Reactive with Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) in the Serum of Patients with AIDS M. G. Sarngadharan, Mikulas Popovic, Lilian Bruch, Jörg Schüpbach, Robert C. Gallo In cats, infection with T-lymphotropic retroviruses can cause T-cell proliferation and leukemia or T-cell depletion and immunosuppression. In humans, some highly T4 tropic retroviruses called HTLV-I can cause T-cell proliferation and leukemia. The subgroup HTLV-II also induces T-cell proliferation in vitro, but its role in disease is unclear. Viruses of a third subgroup of human T-lymphotropic retroviruses, collectively designated HTLV-III, have been isolated from cultured cells of 48 patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The biological properties of HTLV-III and immunological analyses of its proteins show that this virus is a member of the HTLV family, and that it is more closely related to HTLV-II than to HTLV-I. Serum samples from 88 percent of patients with AIDS and from 79 percent of homosexual men with signs and symptoms that frequently precede AIDS, but from less than 1 percent of heterosexual subjects, have antibodies reactive against antigens of HTLV-III. The major immune reactivity appears to be directed against p41, the presumed envelope antigen of the virus. T he incidence of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in homosexual men with multiple sexual partners, intravenous drug abusers, hemophiliacs, blood transfusion recipients, and close heterosexual contacts of members of these high-risk groups (1-7) strongly suggests that the disease spreads by the transmission of an infectious 18 agent (8, 9). The agent’s primary targets within the body appear to be specific subpopulations of T cells. The severe immune deficiency of AIDS patients results from an unusually low proportion of helper T lymphocytes (OKT4+) and a resulting lack of many helper functions, including production of antibodies by B cells (1, 3). Table 1. Antibodies to HTLV-III in serum samples from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS and from control subjects. Wells of 96-well Immulon plates were coated overnight with a lysate of density-banded HTLV-III (30) at 0.5 (µg protein per well in 100 µl 50 mM sodium bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6. The wells were washed with water and incubated for 20 minutes with 100 µl of 5 percent bovine serum albumin in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The wells were washed again in water, and then 100 µl1 of 20 percent normal goat serum in PBS were added to each well, followed by 5 or 10 µl of the test sera. These were allowed to react for 2 hours at room temperature. The wells were washed three times with 0.05 percent Tween-20 in PBS and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with peroxidase-labeled goat antiserum to human immunoglobulin G at a dilution of 1:2000 in 1 percent normal goat serum in PBS. The wells were successively washed four times with 0.05 percent Tween-20 in PBS and four times with PBS and reacted with 100 µl of the substrate mixture containing 0.05 percent orthophenylene diamine and 0.005 percent hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-citrate buffer, pH 5.0. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 50 µl of 4N H2S04, and the color yield was measured with a Dynatech ELISA reader. Assays were done in duplicate and absorbance reading greater than three times the average of four normal negative control readings was taken as positive. Retrovirus infections are known to lead to depressed immune functions in animal systems. For example, in cats, a major result of infection with feline leukemia virus (FeLV) is loss of normal immune function. More FeLVinfected cats die from consequences of this immune dysfunction than from the leukemia itself (10). FeLV provides an example of a single T-cell tropic retrovirus that causes both target cell proliferation (leukemia) and depletion (immunosuppression). By analogy, a human retrovirus with a tropism for T cells should be considered a serious candidate in the etiology of human AIDS. Two subgroups of a family of human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV) have been isolated and characterized (11). The first, HTLV-I, was isolated from a black American with an aggressive form of T-cell lymphoma (12) and has been etiologically linked to the pathogenesis of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) (13-15). Infection with HTLV-I in vitro can alter T-cell function (16) and, in some cases, lead to T-cell death (17). HTLV-II was isolated from a patient with a T-cell variant of hairy cell leukemia (18). Although there are distinct differences between HTLV-I and HTLV-II, they have the following common features: a tropism for OKT4+ lymphocytes (19); a Mg2+-dependent reverse transcriptase (RT) of high molecular weight (100,000) (20); some antigenic crossreactivity in their proteins (18); a novel set of nucleotide sequences called pX at the 3' end of the viral genome; a limited amount of nucleic acid homology in their genomes (21); and similar morphology. Both HTLV-I and HTLV-II have been isolated from cultured T cells of patients with AIDS (22, 23). Another retrovirus was isolated from a homosexual patient with chronic generalized lymphadenopathy (24), a syndrome that often precedes AIDS and is therefore referred to as preAIDS. Proviral DNA of HTLV-I was detected in the cellular DNA of two AIDS patients (25), 19 Fig. 1. Comparison of the SDS–polyacrylamide gel profile of HTLV-III with profiles of HTLV-I and Rauscher murine leukemia virus (R-MuLV). Lane 1, HTLV-I; lane 2, HTLV-III; lane 3, R-MuLV; lane 4, molecular weight standards: phosphorylase b (94,000), bovine serum albumin (68,000), ovalbumin (45,000), chymotrypsinogen (25,500), and lysozyme (14,000). and serum samples from some patients were shown to react with antigens of HTLV-I (26). A larger proportion of the sera reacted with a cell membrane antigen specific to HTLV-I–infected cells (27). This antigen has since been identified as a precursor of the envelope glycoprotein, gp46, of HTLV-I (28, 29). However, the correlation between AIDS and serum antibodies to HTLV-I protein (including the cell membrane antigen, p61) is weak. These results are consistent with the idea that the primary cause of AIDS is another member of the HTLV family with limited cross-reactivities with the known HTLV subgroups. Sera with high titers of antibodies to the AIDS-specific virus might show a detectable reaction with antigens of HTLV-I and HTLV-II, whereas the reaction of sera with low titers might be too weak to recognize in such a cross-reactive system. Our attempts to isolate other retroviruses from AIDS patients resulted in the identification of a number of HTLV isolates that are similar to each other 20 but are distinguishable from HTLV-I and HTLV-II. These new isolates are designated HTLV-III and are described in the accompanying reports (30-32). Here we describe the use of HTLV-III in an immunological screening of serum samples from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS and from individuals at increased risk for AIDS. The virus was purified from supernatants of cell cultures supporting the continuous production of HTLV-III (30). The virus showed a difference in the makeup of its protein components as revealed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of a sucrose density banded preparation (Fig. 1, lane 2). Like HTLV-I (lane 1), and unlike common mammalian retroviruses (for example, Rauscher murine leukemia virus, lane 3), HTLV-III (lane 2) has a major group-specific antigen (gag protein) with a molecular weight of 24,000 (p24). It has a reverse transcriptase with a molecular weight of about 100,000, another protein with a molecular weight of 41,000 (presumably the envelope glycoprotein), and shows a tropism for OKT4+ lymphocytes. However, it lacks the band separating at a molecular weight of 19,000 (pl9). Instead, it has a smaller band that is missing in HTLV-I. Immunological studies presented in an accompanying report (32) also indicate that HTLV-III is antigenically different from HTLV-I and -II, but that it also shares a variety of antigenic determinants with them, especially with HTLVII. This relatedness has also been confirmed by comparison of nucleotide sequences of the three types of HTLV (33). Serum samples were obtained from patients with clinically documented AIDS, Kaposi’s sarcoma, sexual contacts of AIDS patients, intravenous drug abusers, homosexual men, and heterosexual subjects. These sera were tested for their reactivity to HTLV-III by means of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (34). Lysates of sucrose density banded HTLV-III were coated on 96-well microtiter plates. The test sera were diluted with normal goat serum, added to the wells, and allowed to react for 2 hours or overnight at room temperature. The primary immune complex formed with the antibodies in the human sera was detected by adding peroxidase-labeled goat antiserum to human immunoglobulins and assaying for a colored peroxidase reaction product (34). The results are presented in Table 1. Of 49 clinically diagnosed AIDS patients, 43 (88 percent) showed serum reactivity in this assay. Two of the subjects whose serum reacted positively with the HTLV preparation had developed AIDS after receiving blood transfusions, one in Haiti and the other in Aruba. Of 14 homosexual men with preAIDS, 11 (79 percent) were positive. Of 17 homosexual men with no clinical symptoms of AIDS, seven were positive. At least one of these was known to be a long-time sexual partner of a patient with clinically diagnosed AIDS. Another had persistent fatigue and possibly other early symptoms of AIDS. Because these 17 men had been seeking medical assistance, they are not a representative sample of the homosexual population, and the high incidence of HTLV-III–specific antibodies in their sera may not reflect the true incidence in the homosexual population. One of the three intravenous drug abusers that were positive for serum antibodies to HTLV-III was also a homosexual. Serum samples from only one of 186 control subjects reacted positively in this test. These control subjects included three with hepatitis B virus infection, one with rheumatoid arthritis, six with systemic lupus erythematosus, four with acute mononucleosis, and eight with various forms of lymphatic leukemias and lymphomas, some of whom were positive for HTLV-I. The rest were normal donors of unknown sexual preference including laboratory workers ranging in age from 22 to 50. To understand the molecular nature of the antigens recognized by ELISA, we conducted the following experiment. A lysate of HTLVIII was fractionated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose sheet by the eleetrophoretic blotting (Western) technique of Towbin et al. (35). The nitrocellulose sheet was cut into 0.5-cm strips and reacted with samples of the human sera. Antigen-antibody complexes formed were detected by autoradiography after incubation of the strips with 125I-labeled goat antibody to human immunoglobulin. Figure 2 shows that the antigen most prominently and commonly detected among all of the sera from AIDS patients had a molecular weight of 41,000 (p41). This corresponds to one of the major proteins of the virus (Fig. 1) and is pre- Fig. 2. Identification of HTLV-III antigens recognized by sera of AIDS patients. HTLV-III was lysed and fractionated by electrophoresis on a 12 percent polyacrylamide slab gel in the presence of SDS. The protein bands on the gel were electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose sheet according to the procedure of Towbin et al. (35). Strip solid-phase radioimmunoassays were then performed as described (36). The sheet was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours with 5 percent bovine serum albumin in 10 mM tris-HCl, pH 7.5 containing 0.9 percent NaCl and cut into 0.5-cm strips. Each strip was incubated for 2 hours at 37°C and 2 hours at room temperature in a screw cap tube containing 2.5 ml of buffer-1 (20 mM tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2M NaCl, 0.3 percent Triton X100, and 2 mg of bovine serum albumin and 0.2 mg of human Fab per milliliter). Test sera (25 µl) were then added to individual tubes containing the strips and incubation was continued for 1 hour at room temperature and overnight in the cold. The strips were washed three times with a solution containing 0.5 percent sodium deoxycholate, 0.1M NaCl, 0.5 percent Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5. The strips were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with 2.4 ml of buffer-1 and 0.1 ml of normal goat serum. Affinity-purified and 125Ilabeled goat antiserum to human immunoglobulin (µ chain and Fc fragment) (1.25 x 106 count/ min) were added to the reaction mixture and the incubation was continued for 30 minutes at room temperature. The strips were washed as described, dried, mounted, and exposed to x-ray film. Strip 1, adult T-cell leukemia; strip 2, normal donor; strip 3, mother of a child with AIDS; strips 4 and 6 to 10, AIDS patients; and strip 5, patient with pre-AIDS. 21 sumably the envelope protein. Strip 7 shows the result obtained with serum from an AIDS patient that reacted negatively in the ELISA but in this more sensitive strip assay it gave a low, but definitely positive, result. Reactivity to p24 of the virus was generally very weak and was clear only in two cases (strips 4 and 5). This may be a reflection of the relative titer toward different antigens. One would expect the highest antibody titer against the envelope of the infecting agent, especially if the infection causes a pronounced immune deficiency and decreased capacity to make antibodies in response to subsequent antigenic challenge. Additional reactivities against antigens with molecular weights of 66,000 and 51,000 were seen in some sera. In strip 8 the serum reacted with an additional antigen that has a molecular weight of 31,000. These additional antigens appear to be related to those detected by sera from the same patients in HTLV-III–producing cells (33). Strips 1 and 2 show that sera from a patient with ATL who was positive for HTLV-I and from a normal subject do not react with the antigens of HTLV-III. Of particular interest is the finding that among the serum samples that reacted positively with HTLV-III two were from young children (ages 7 months and 2 years). These children were free of known opportunistic infections including cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Pneumocystis carinii, and fungus. The mother of one of them was positive in both tests described here. The children presumably acquired the infection in utero, by their mother’s milk, or by another route. Among the positive serum samples from AIDS patients there appears to be a wide variation in antibody titer to HTLV-III. Generally, the titers in sera from patients with advanced AIDS are significantly lower than those in sera from newly diagnosed patients and patients with pre-AIDS. This is consistent with the idea that HTLV-III infection causes an initial lymphoid proliferation but eventually causes death of the target lymphocytes (OKT4+) leading to the abnormal T4+/T8+ ratios and loss of helper T-cell functions including antibody production by B cells. Therefore, the low or negative result in the ELISA of sera from some cases of advanced AIDS may be a consequence of the 22 natural course of the disease. To prove this it will be necessary to study antibody titers in sera obtained at intervals from subjects at risk for the disease. The serum of one AIDS patient showed a low positive titer, but serum from his homosexual partner with no symptoms of AIDS had a significantly higher antibody titer. It is interesting that the serum of one AIDS patient that was negative in the ELISA did show a definite but low positive reaction with p41 in the more sensitive Western blot assay (Fig. 2, strip 7). The ELISA with purified p41 might prove to be even more sensitive. It is significant that although HTLV proviral sequences were clearly detected in DNA from cell samples obtained from two AIDS patients early in the course of their disease, these sequences could not be detected in cells obtained after 1 year in one case and 2 months in the second case (25). It is conceivable that the subset of T lymphocytes that forms the target of the provirus had been depleted before the second samples were obtained in each case. In conclusion, we have shown a high incidence of specific antibodies to HTLV-III in patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Among the antibody-positive cases reported here a few are of particular importance with respect to the transmission of the disease. For example, the mother of the baby with AIDS was positive for HTLV-III as was a long-term sexual partner of a homosexual with AIDS. Recipients of blood products originating from individuals at risk for AIDS were also positive for HTLV-III and, as described in an accompanying report (31), the virus has been isolated from several children with AIDS as well as from their mothers. The data presented here and in the accompanying reports (30-32) suggest that HTLV-III is the primary cause of AIDS. 7. J. W. Curran, D. N. Lawrence, H. Jaffe, J. E. Kaplan, L. D. Zyla, M. Chamberland, R. Weinstein, K.-J. Lui, L. B. Schonberger, T. J. Spira, W. J. Alexander, G. Swinger, A. Ammann, S. Solomon, D. Auerback, R. Stoneberger, J. M. Mason, H. W. Haverkos, B. L. Evatt, N. Engl. J. Med. 310, 69 (1984). 8. Centers for Disease Control, Task Force on Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections, ibid. 306, 248 (1982). 9. J. P. Hanrahan, G. P. Wormser, C. P. Maguire, L. J. De Lorenzo, G. Davis, ibid. 307, 498 (1982). 10. M. Essex, W. D. Hardy, Jr., S. M. Cotter, R. M. Jakowski, A. Sliski, Infect. Immun. 11, 470 (1975); W. D. Hardy, Jr., P. W. Hess, E. G. MacEwen, A. J. McClelland, E. E. Zuckerman, M. Essex, S. M. Cotter, Cancer Res. 36, 582 (1976) ; L. J. Anderson, O. Jarrett, H. M. Laird, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 47, 807 (1971). 11. R. C. Gallo, in Cancer Surveys, L. M. Franks et al., Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, in press). 12. B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, A. F. Gazdar, P. A. Bunn, J. D. Minna, R. C. Gallo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7415 (1980). 13. V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, Y. Nakao, Y. Ito, T. Aoki, R. C. Gallo, ibid. 79, 1653 (1982). 14. W. A. Blattner, V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. Robert-Guroff, T. A. Lister, D. A. G. Galton, P. Sarin, M. H. Crawford, D. Catovsky, M. Greaves, R. C. Gallo, Int. J. Cancer 30, 257 (1982). 15. R. C. Gallo et al., Cancer Res. 43, 3892 (1983). 16. M. Popovic, N. Flomberg, D. Volkman, D. Mann, A. S. Fauci, B. DuPont, R. C. Gallo, in preparation. 17. H. Mitsuya, H. G. Guo, M. Megson, C. D. Trainor, M. S. Reitz, S. Broder, Science 223, 1293 (1984). 18. V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, M. RobertGuroff, I. Miyoshi, D. Blayney, D. Golde, R. C. Gallo, ibid. 218, 571 (1982). 19. M. Popovic, unpublished observation. 20. H. M. Rho, B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, R. C. Gallo, Virology 112, 355 (1981). 21. E. P. Gelmann, G. Franchini, V. Manzari, F. Wong-Staal, R. C. Gallo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 993 (1984). 22. R. C. Gallo et al., Science 220, 865 (1983). 23. M. Popovic et al., in preparation. 24. F. Barré-Sinoussi et al., Science 220, 868 (1983). 25. E. P. Gelmann, M. Popovic, D. Blayney, H. Mazur, G. Sidhu, R. E. Stahl, R. C. Gallo, ibid. p. 862. 26. M. Robert-Guroff et al., unpublished results. 27. M. Essex, M. F. McLane, T. H. Lee, L. Falk, C. W. S. Howe, J. I. Mullins, C. Cabradilla, D. P. Francis, Science 220, 859 (1983). 28. J. Schüpbach, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, ibid., in press. 29. T. H. Lee, J. E. Coligan, T. Homma, M. F. McLane, M. Tochipana, M. Essex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., in press. 30. M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 497 (1984). 31. R. C. Gallo et al., ibid., p. 500. 32. J. Schüpbach, M. Popovic, R. V. Gilden, M. A. Donda, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, ibid. p. 503. 33. S. Arya et al., in preparation. 34. C. Saxinger and R. C. Gallo. Lab. Invest. 49, 371 (1983). 35. H. Towbin, T. Staehelin, J. Gordon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 4350 (1979). 36. J. Schüpbach, V. S. Kalyanaraman, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, in preparation. 37. We thank K. L. Arnett for technical assistance and R. Lüthy and M. Vogt, Division of Infectious Diseases, Departme nt of Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, and O. Haller, Institute for Immunology and Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, for providing us with sera from AIDS and pre-AIDS patients and for clinical information. J.S. is a Fogarty International Fellow of the National Cancer Institute. 30 March 1984; accepted 19 April 1984 References and Notes 1. M. S. Gottlieb, R. Schroff, H. M. Schanker, I. D. Weisman, P. T. Fan, R. A. Wolf, A. Saxon, N. Engl. J. Med. 305, 1425 (1981). 2. H. Masur, M. A. Michelis, J. B. Greene, ibid., p. 1431. 3. F. P. Siegal et al., ibid., p. 1439. 4. M. Poon, A. Landay, E. F. Prasthofer, S. Stagno, Ann. Int. Med. 98, 287 (1983). 5. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 31, 697 (1983). 6. B. Moll, E. E. Emerson, C. B. Small, G. H. Friedland, R. S. Klein, I. Spigland, Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 25, 417 (1982). 23 The National Cancer Institute’s Role in AIDS and Cancer therapy (HAART) regimen that has considerably extended the lives of many HIV patients. Robert Wiltrout and John Niederhuber National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Though HAART has been a great success, it is far from a cure. Recently, NCI investigators, working with industry, helped develop another FDA-approved drug (darunavir), a novel protease inhibitor for treatment of drug resistant HIV (9). Resistance mechanisms are also under investigation in monkey models, thanks to the development by Dr. Vineet KewalRamani in the HIV Drug Resistance Program (DRP) of an HIV-SIV hybrid which can cause disease in monkeys, yet retains the drug sensitivity characteristics of HIV. The Laboratories of Molecular Pharmacology and Medicinal Chemistry are collaborating to develop drugs that inhibit HIV integrase, a target currently not exploited in HAART regimens. Bevirimat, an HIV maturation inhibitor developed in the DRP, has been shown to be effective against drug resistant strains of HIV that lack a mutation in the Gag capsid protein targeted by the compound in a Phase 2 clinical trial (1). Finally, investigators are exploring several vaccine strategies designed to elicit cellular and humoral immune responses necessary for effective prophylaxis against HIV. Work continues on DNA vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, whole virus vaccines based on inactivated virions, and live vector vaccines that utilize poxvirus or adenovirus. I n early 1981, a young man presented to physicians at NCI’s Metabolism Branch with severe lymphopenia and fever. A bone marrow biopsy revealed extensive mycobacterial infiltration. Though the etiology of his immunodeficiency confounded his physicians, his presenting symptoms had recently been described in a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report addressing the appearance of immunodeficiency and opportunistic infections among young gay men (1). Similar cases were soon being referred to NCI’s Immunology Branch and reported, in increasing numbers, in large cities across the country. NCI’s leaders quickly recognized the emergence of a new epidemic and the need to act swiftly. In September 1981, NCI’s Division of Cancer Treatment convened the first national meeting to uncover the causative factor(s) of the new immunodeficiency disease. HTLV-I, the first known human retrovirus, had been identified as the causative agent in adult T-cell lymphoma just one year prior by a group of investigators, led by Dr. Robert Gallo, in NCI’s Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology (2). Because HTLV-I caused immunodeficiency and cancer, it was suggested 24 that it, or a similar virus, was a possible etiologic agent for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This avenue paid dividends when Dr. Gallo’s group and Dr. Luc Montagnier in France co-discovered HIV (3, 4). These studies led to the development, by Dr. Gallo’s group at NCI, of the first diagnostic antibody test for AIDS, thus ensuring the safety of the blood supply. NCI aggressively pursued the characterization of the virus, in an effort to develop an effective treatment. By 1985, a trio of NCI investigators, Samuel Broder, Hiroaki Mitsuya, and Robert Yarchoan, had demonstrated in vitro the antiviral activity of certain nucleoside analogs. This work led to the development of zidovudine (AZT) (5), the first US FDA–approved drug in the treatment of AIDS. Didanosine (6) and zalcitabine (7) followed shortly. Subsequent work by NCI Frederick’s structural biology group yielded the sequence and structural conformation of the HIV protease (8). This paved the way for the development of a new class of antiviral agents: protease inhibitors. Today, along with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside analogs and protease inhibitors are the foundation of the highly active antiretroviral Anti-HIV strategies are only one part of the story. The catalyst for NCI’s involvement in AIDS was the high prevalence of cancer in the infected population. Due to the HIV-induced reduction in host resistance, many AIDS-related malignancies have viral etiologies. KSHV (Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus), EBV (Epstein-Barr virus) and HPV (human papillomavirus) are implicated in Kaposi’s sarcoma, non Hodgkin lymphoma, and cervical cancer—all of which are more prevalent in the HIV-infected population. Cancer has emerged as the leading cause of death in HIV-infected patients now that the HAART regimen has led to the decline of opportunistic infections and advanced AIDS. Therefore, NCI has devoted considerable attention to the treatment of AIDSrelated malignancies. Dr. Robert Yarchoan and Dr. Richard Little have defined a therapeutic regimen for Kaposi’s sarcoma; Dr. Little and Dr. Wyndam Wilson defined EPOCH (etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone) therapy for AIDSrelated lymphoma. Studies are ongoing by the Yarchoan group investigating the development of treatment strategies for Kaposi’s sarcoma using prodrugs activated by viral enzymes that specifically target KSHV-infected cells. Other investigators have succeeded in targeting the underlying viral etiology in HIV-related cancer. In 2006, the FDA approved a vaccine for cervical cancer prophylaxis (11). The vaccine, developed in part by Drs. Douglas Lowy and John Schiller in NCI’s Laboratory of Cellular Oncology, targets HPV 16 and 18, which are implicated in up to 70 percent of cervical cancers. 25 Success in the development of this vaccine has relevance far beyond the HIV-infected population, as the vast majority of cervical cancer cases occur in the absence of HIV coinfection. Similarly, EBV infection in parts of Africa is endemic and independent of HIV. It is estimated that approximately 18 percent of human cancers are caused by infection, both viral and nonviral (12). Additional viruses have been found to be associated with cancers, though no causal link has been established (13). As our ability to detect infectious agents in association with cancer improves and more studies are done to establish causation, it is likely that the current figure will rise. The expertise NCI has gained in identifying, treating, and preventing infectious causes of cancer is likely to pay enormous dividends in the near future. NCI’s investment in and commitment to HIV-related research, ever since that first patient in 1981, has improved the lives of countless patients with HIV, with further advances to come. The work of NCI scientists has also placed the institute in an ideal position to undertake the challenge of uncovering new infectious causes of cancer and building on the intervention strategies that we have developed in our HIV work to successfully prevent or treat these cancers at the earliest stages of development. References 1. Morbid. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 3(25): 305-8, 1981. 2. B. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, A. F. Gazdar et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77: 7415-19, 1980. 3. M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo Science 224: 497-500, 1984. 4. F. Barré-Sinoussi, J. C. Chermann, F. Rey, M. T. Nugeyre, S. Chamaret, J. Gruest, C. Dauguet, C. Axler-Blin, F. Vézinet-Brun, C. Rouzioux, W. Rozenbaum, L. Montagnier Science 220: 868-71, 1983. 5. H. Mitsuya, K. J. Weinhold, P. A. Furman et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 82(20): 7096100, 1985. 6. R. Yarchoan, H. Mitsuya, R. V. Thomas et al., Science. 245: 412-5, 1989. 7. H. Mitsuya, R. Yarchoan, S. Broder Science 249: 1533-44, 1990. 8. A. Wlodawer, J. Vondrasek Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 27: 249-284, 1998. 9. Y. Koh, H. Nakata, K. Maeda et al., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47(10): 31239, 2003. 10. J. Lalezari, S. McCallister, M. Gigliotti et al., 48th International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2008). Washington, D.C., October 25-28, 2008. Abstract H-89. 11. C. Carillo-Infante, G. Abbadessa, L. Bagella, A. Giordano International Journal of Oncology 30: 1521-28, 2007. 12. D. M. Parkin Int. J. Cancer 118: 3030–44, 2006. 13. M. E. McLaughlin-Drubin, K. Munger Biochemia et Biophysica Acta 1782: 127-50, 2008. Understanding Causation Leads to Treatment Samuel Broder, M.D. Director, National Cancer Institute, Retired Chief Medical Officer, Celera Corporation, Rockville, Maryland 20850 his year we mark the 25th anniversary of the four classic Science publications by the Gallo group, which identified the pathogenic retrovirus HIV. T tients with AIDS. Within my group, Hiroaki Mitsuya spearheaded the lab-based discovery effort while Robert Yarchoan did the same for clinical investigation. These discoveries overturned entrenched beliefs including: (1) active retroviruses did not exist in human beings; or (2) if they did, they were not associated with human diseases; or (3) if they were involved in disease, such agents played a relatively minor or anecdotal role in public health. These beliefs were a barrier to progress in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV/AIDS. We discovered the antiretroviral features of a series of dideoxynucleosides, the most prominent of which was AZT (now known as zidovudine), and took them into clinical trials (1-6), a process facilitated by a fortuitous NIH tradition of locating research labs adjacent to its Clinical Center. These agents held promise, partly because we found a huge differential between in vitro drug concentrations needed to inhibit HIV replication, and the level required to induce toxicity for human host cells, inhibition of antigen, or mitogen-driven T-cell activation and immunoglobulin production by indicator B cells. The Gallo discoveries affected many aspects of public health, including the development of effective antiviral agents and targeting the proven causative agent of the AIDS pandemic, not secondary or opportunistic infections, nor bystander microbes. Such antiretroviral agents have reduced the death rate of AIDS in this country and other parts of the world. The publication of this work, and none other, made it possible for my laboratory, starting in May 1984, to develop the first FDA-approved antiretroviral agents for treating pa- 26 Approximately one year after the key Gallo Science papers, the first patient received AZT at the NIH Clinical Center during the initial Phase 1 clinical trial. We published a series of papers summarizing this drug family’s broad antiretroviral activity and, more important by far, evidence for clinical activity including discoveries related to pharmacology on both cellular and clinical levels. Several of the 27 drugs studied were advanced into randomized, multicenter clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which in turn led to rapid approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and by health ministries in other countries. Such agents are generally still used in combination regimens. Several of the agents were integrated into later combinations with viral protease inhibitors and other drugs when it became apparent that no single drug could be expected to achieve durable viral suppression and clinical benefits. Therefore, it was often not necessary to abandon already approved drugs, but rather retain their clinical legacy by inclusion in combinations with newer agents. What ultimately became known as HAART—highly active antiretroviral therapy— proved up to the task. At a minimum, these events removed the lingering doubt that pathogenic retroviruses were inherently untreatable, which had, until our work, a significant impact on both basic and clinical research. What might have been considered the most refractory feature of HIV/ AIDS, i.e., dementias associated with infection in the central nervous system, responded to therapy in some cases, with improved neurologic signs and reversal of brain metabolic abnormalities. Dideoxynucleosides like AZT, alone and in combination, were shown quickly to improve neurodevelopmental function and growth velocity in pediatric patients with AIDS. 28 The public health consequences are noteworthy. Proof that HIV could be treated using clinically active antiretroviral agents led, by around 1995, to a precipitous drop in the annual age-specific death rate from HIV/AIDS in the United States, reversing the inexorable rise in statistics reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/ surveillance/resources/slides/ mortality). Moreover, the actuarial statistics for people surviving after a diagnosis of HIV/AIDS have improved yearly since then. Similarly, the availability of such agents has led to a major change in the outcomes and destinies of HIV/AIDS patients, their families, and communities in the developing world. Low-cost versions of such therapies have saved many lives among the developing world’s adults and children. Antiretroviral therapies provide a practical way to reduce maternal-child transmission associated with pregnancy and breast-feeding, the latter being essential for infant survival in many developing countries, but unfortunately, also a route for postpartum viral transmission. While we mark the 25th anniversary of the Gallo discoveries, there remains unfinished business. This is certainly true in HIV vaccine development, but there is reason for cautious optimism on this front as well, a topic that will be covered in more detail in other portions of this booklet. That said, a sense of complacency based on progress from prior work might reverse gains in the future. There are worrisome signs that unusual subtypes or chimeric strains of HIV are emerging, potentially affecting viral load monitoring and the activity of antiretroviral therapies. In particular, non-B subtypes may pose special challenges if they manifest unique patterns of drug susceptibility and resistance. This makes several of the HIV molecular epidemiology and surveillance programs now carried out at the Institute of Human Virology and other centers all the more important. Indeed, all of this makes expanded support for AIDS research at NIH a crucial national priority. Yet, this is also a moment to reflect on the intellect, creativity, and tenacity of the Gallo group, leading to the discovery of HIV as the causative agent of a terrible disease without precedent in modern times and to the discovery of antiretroviral therapy with proven clinical utility. These discoveries changed the trajectory of a pandemic. References 1. H. Mitsuya, S. Broder, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 1911 (Mar. 1986). 2. H. Mitsuya, S. Broder, Nature 325, 773 (Feb. 26-Mar. 4, 1987). 3. H. Mitsuya et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7096 (Oct. 1985). 4. H. Mitsuya, R. Yarchoan, S. Broder, Science 249, 1533 (Sep. 28, 1990). 5. R. Yarchoan et al., Lancet 1, 575 (Mar. 15, 1986). 6. R. Yarchoan, H. Mitsuya, C. E. Myers, S. Broder, New Engl. J. Med. 321, 726 (Sep. 14, 1989). Disclosure: The author is a former director of the National Cancer Institute, and currently an employee of the Celera Corporation, which has commercial programs in molecular diagnostics for HIV. He is also a co-inventor on government HIV therapy patents and has received a royalty under the Federal Technology Transfer Act. On the Discovery of Human Retroviruses: Interleukin-2; HTLV-I and HTLV-II; Isolation of HIV-1 Anders Vahlne Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden T o isolate T-cell lymphotropic viruses one needs to culture T lymphocytes. Working with conditioned medium to grow lymphocytes, Gallo together with two of his postdoctoral fellows, Doris Morgan and Frank Ruscetti, discovered T-cell growth factor (TCGF) later named interleukin 2 (IL-2). The first report of IL-2/TCGF was published in 1976 (1) and signaled a new capacity for in vitro growth and analysis of human T cells and, consequently, viruses that target these cells. Reverse transcriptase activity was detected by Gallo’s group in a Tcell line established (using IL-2) from a patient diagnosed originally with mycosis fungoides in 1979. To show that this was a novel human retrovirus, i.e., not any of the known animal retroviruses, Gallo and 29 co-workers demonstrated that: virus could be isolated from tissue samples of the same patient by culturing primary T cells with IL-2, it could infect human T cells in vitro, specific antibodies to the virus were found in serum from the patient, proviral DNA was integrated in cells from which the virus was isolated, and specific antibodies were documented in multiple patients. Most or all these results were obtained by the time (August 1980) Gallo submitted the first paper on isolation of a human retrovirus (2) which appeared that December. Gallo designated the virus human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV). Gallo and his group next isolated HTLV-I from cells of a patient with Sézary T-cell leukemia, submitting their results in May 1981 (3). Then, in June and July, six and seven months, respectively, after the first Gallo paper on HTLV was published and more than a year after it was submitted, Yorio Hinuma and his group submitted two papers showing that patients with adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) or malignant T lymphoma had antibodies against the MT-1 cell line, and that extracellular type C virus particles were detected in MT-1 cultures (4). Furthermore, on transmission of virus from MT-1 cells (female) to cord blood cells of a male infant, the latter cells were transformed (immortalized) (5); they designated the virus adult Tcell leukemia virus (ATLV). In October of 1981, Gallo’s group submitted a report (6) showing that five of six tested ATL patients in Japan had antibodies to HTLVI (the only HTLV known at the 30 time). Characterization of ATLV as a retrovirus was published first in March 1982. In this paper (7) submitted in November 1981, it was also reported that proviral DNA was detected in fresh peripheral lymphocytes from five patients with ATL but not in healthy adults. It should be mentioned that the connection between HTLV-I and ATL was facilitated greatly by Kiyoshi Takatsuki’s earlier work that revealed a distinct subset of highly endemic leukemia in southern Japan. The recognition that HTLV-I causes ATL and that breast-feeding readily transmits virus led to a drastic reduction in ATL incidence for Japan. In November 1982, Gallo’s group together with Japanese colleagues Nakao, Miyoshi, Minowada, Yoshida, and Ito reported that HTLV-I and ATLV were the same virus (8) and selected the designation HTLV-I, recognizing that Gallo’s group isolated the first known human retrovirus. By 1982, Gallo and co-workers reported a second human retrovirus, HTLV-II, in a patient with hairy cell leukemia (9). However, no malignancy or other disease has yet been linked clearly to this virus. The first report of a new human retrovirus that was distinct morphologically from HTLV-I and HTLV-II was an oral presentation by Luc Montagnier at the Cold Spring Harbor meeting in September 1983 [a proceedings was published September 1984] (10). The first publication in a peer-reviewed journal showed a new retrovirus isolated from siblings with hemophilia B, one of whom had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (11). Immunological and molecular characterizations of the isolated virus did not discriminate convincingly the new virus from HTLV-I, save for an electron micrograph that clearly depicts virus with a cylindrical or conical core, different from the spherical cores in HTLV-I and HTLV-II and consistent with lentivirus morphology. The paper, however, did not establish the new virus as a causative agent for AIDS. It has been claimed that the first report describing a new human retrovirus distinct from HTLV-I and HTLV-II was the paper from Montagnier’s group that appeared in a May issue of Science in 1983 (12). However, I would argue that this paper fails to prove a new virus. First, the virus described in the 1983 paper was claimed to have a type C morphology, not the lentivirus morphology of HIV. Second, the immunofluorescence and immune precipitation data lacked proper positive controls for claiming the virus was distinct from HTLV-I and no convincing evidence was presented distinguishing it from HTLV-II. Specifically, sera from HTLV-I– and HTLV-II–infected patients was not tested. The paper was written apparently in haste as acknowledged by Montagnier, and contains numerous errors and omissions from the figure legends. Montagnier got the idea of a retrovirus as the cause of AIDS indirectly from Robert Gallo and Myron Essex. The French group used protocols for virus isolation and RT detection that were developed by Gallo and many of the reagents they used were also obtained from Gallo. Robert Gallo was not only indispensible for the French group to isolate HIV-1 (HTLV-III), his was the first group to show convincingly that this new human retrovirus was the causative agent of AIDS (13 and see page 10). Gallo’s group also provided the first blood test to screen donors for the presence of HIV infection (14, 15 and see pages 18 and 4). The rapid implementation of the latter in the United States and Europe probably saved hundreds of thousands of lives. References 1. D. A. Morgan, F. W. Ruscetti, R. Gallo, Science 193, 1007 (Sep. 10, 1976). 2. B. J. Poiesz et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7415 (Dec. 1980). 3. B. J. Poiesz, F. W. Ruscetti, M. S. Reitz, V. S. Kalyanaraman, R. C. Gallo, Nature 294, 268 (Nov. 19, 1981). 4. Y. Hinuma et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 6476 (Oct. 1981). 5. I. Miyoshi et al., Nature 294, 770 (Dec. 24, 1981). 6. M. Robert-Guroff et al., Virology 122, 297 (Oct. 30, 1982). 7. M. Yoshida, I. Miyoshi, Y. Hinuma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 2031 (Mar. 1982). 8. M. Popovic et al., Nature 300, 63 (Nov. 4, 1982). 9. V. S. Kalyanaraman et al., Science 218, 571 (Nov. 5, 1982). 10. L. Montagnier, J. C. Chermann, F. Barré-Sinoussi, S. Chamaret, J. Gruest, M. Nugeyre, F. Rey, C. Dauguet, C. Axler-Blin, F. Vézinet-Brun, C. Rouzioux, G. A. Saimot, W. Rozenbaum, J. C. Gluckman, D. Klatzman, E. Vilmer, C. Griscelli, C. Foyer-Gazengel, and J. B. Brunet, A new human T-lymphotropic retrovirus: Characterization and possible role in lymphadenopathy and acquired immune deficiency syndromes. R. C. Gallo, M. Essex, L. Gross, Eds., Human T-Cell Leukemia/ Lymphoma Virus (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory New York, 1984), pp. 363-379. 11. E. Vilmer et al., Lancet 1, 753 (Apr. 7, 1984). 12. F. Barré-Sinoussi et al., Science 220, 868 (May 20, 1983). 13. R. C. Gallo et al., Science 224, 500 (May 4, 1984). 14. M. G. Sarngadharan, M. Popovic, L. Bruch, J. Schüpbach, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 506 (May 4, 1984). 15. M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 497 (May 4, 1984). 31 An HIV Vaccine—When and How? José Esparza,* Francine E. McCutchan,* George K. Lewis,** and Robert C. Gallo** *Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98102 , U.S.A. **Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, U.S.A. S oon after HIV was defined as the etiological agent of AIDS in 1983-1984 (1-6 and see pages 4, 10, 14, and 18) there were expectations that an effective HIV vaccine would soon be developed. However, scientific complexities including the apparent inability of natural immune responses to control HIV replication, permanent HIV proviral DNA integration, HIV genome variation with nine genetic subtypes plus many recombinants, and rapid immune impairment make it evident that developing an HIV vaccine is one of the most difficult challenges confronting the biomedical community (7, 8). Most successful viral vaccines are based on live-attenuated or wholeinactivated viruses, options that are not available for HIV because of obvious safety concerns and/or lack of impressive experimental results. Developing HIV vaccines requires more challenging strategies like the use of subunits as proteins or genes, to induce humoral and/or cell-mediated immune responses against protective virus epitopes. Clearly needed is a vaccine that prevents infection but, so far, none does. Some may prevent disease, at least for a certain period of time, but even this type of vaccine is 32 challenging because HIV quickly causes immune system damage and subverts the vaccine response. In the first weeks of HIV infection, there is near-complete destruction of gut-associated lymphoid tissue which harbors a majority of the body’s immune cells. Moreover, CD4+ T cells, which coordinate and sustain the immune response to pathogens, are the very cells that HIV prefers to infect, especially those that are activated and in the process of combating infections. A current strategy for HIV vaccine development is to identify key correlates of protection from natural infection studies and apply these as criteria for the performance of candidate vaccines in animal models and clinical trials. Several studies already pointed to human immune responses that are correlated with protection from HIV infection. High spontaneous ß-chemokine production among HIV-negative participants in the MACS study (9) or hemophiliacs that remained uninfected despite exposure to HIV (10) established the production of ß-chemokines as a correlate of HIV protection. Neutralizing antibodies (11, 12) were associated with longterm nonprogression among HIV+ individuals and effective CTL responses were associated with elite controller status (13). Until we know how to sustain high level production of ß-chemokines or neutralizing antibodies, the way forward will be empirical evaluation of candidate vaccines in animal models in which a relevant challenge can be employed with protection from infection or blockade of disease as the outcome. The SIV and SHIV infection of rhesus macaques are the only current models, but the limited range of virus isolates that can be used for challenge, differences in the MHC Class I alleles that present antigens to T cells, and the very few vaccine candidates that elicit antibodies which neutralize challenge strains are symptomatic of the model’s limitations. Three overlapping “waves” of vaccines have been studied (14, 15). The first was based on a concept that neutralizing antibodies would confer protection against HIV infection or development of AIDS. This concept received early support from chimpanzee protection experiments and from recent passive transfer studies in macaques that were protected from challenge. These vaccines were based on the envelope glycoproteins of HIV, especially gp120, and they induced neutral-izing antibodies directed against laboratory strains of HIV with weak or no neutralizing activity against clinically relevant primary HIV isolates. Efficacy trials in people showed conclusively that these candidate vaccines failed to protect against HIV infection and had no impact on viral load in subjects who became infected with HIV after vaccination. It is evident that far better envelope vaccines must be developed. The second wave started in the mid 1990s with recognition of the importance for CD8+ T-cell responses in the control of HIV infection. This led to DNA vaccines and live recombinant virus vectors, especially poxvirus and adenovirus, capable of delivering HIV-1 antigens that are presented by the MHC Class I pathway. These candidate vaccines elicit CTL in some proportion of vaccinees and induce crossreactive responses against multiple HIV subtypes in some volunteers, but even in these cases the key question is whether the responses will be durable in the face of HIV’s ability to escape the CTL response. There are obvious reasons to suspect that the control of HIV variants will not be permanent. The first efficacy trial of a second-wave candidate vaccine was initiated in 2003, priming with a canarypoxHIV vector combined with a gp120 boost, and results are not expected until late 2009. Encouraging results from preclinical and Phase 1 trials of adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) vectored vaccines, that were developed by Merck & Co. and supported by NIH, led to a 2005 “proof-of-concept” trial with Ad5 containing HIV-1 gag/pol/nef genes that was conducted in the United States, Latin America, and the Caribbean (the STEP trial). A parallel trial was conducted in South Africa (the Phambili trial). Both were halted in 2007 when a startling fact emerged: a subset of vaccine recipients with higher levels of preexisting Ad5 antibodies had increased HIV acquisition (16). The failure of the STEP trial caused a turning point 33 in the field, because that vaccine was considered by many as the most promising candidate. Some experts objected to this kind of trial because it was based solely on the induction of cell-mediated immunity (17). The third wave of HIV vaccines is starting now and involves optimizing immune responses by existing or soon-to-be-developed candidate vaccines. The goals are to develop candidate vaccines that induce antibodies capable of neutralizing clinical strains from a wide variety of HIV-1 subtypes and/or rapid antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC), joined with vaccines inducing high levels of long-lasting, cross-reactive CTL against different structural and regulatory proteins of HIV. Understanding these developments helps explain why the conduct of HIV vaccine trials is controversial. Candidate vaccines are based on the science available at the time, but the pace of discovery in the field of HIV biology is rapid and soon the rationale for a candidate vaccine is superseded by new knowledge. This situation may lead to calls for stopping the conduct of trials with “old” candidate vaccines, but the field needs the discipline to ensure that appropriate vaccine concepts are tested to completion, incorporating new knowledge into the analysis as trials proceed. However, much more attention must be given to the selection of rational candidates. Since the ultimate goal is to prevent infection, the development 34 of envelope-based candidate vaccines capable of inducing the appropriate type of neutralizing antibodies and/or ADCC is a high priority. Though a major challenge, it is one now being approached by sophisticated interactions of structural biology, peptide chemistry, immunology, and genetic engineering. Multiple approaches are being explored to direct or redirect the immune response to neutralization-relevant epitopes of gp120 or gp41, some of which are normally hidden in the envelope glycoprotein or only transiently expressed during virus binding to CD4 (18, 19). In conclusion, vaccines are part of the long-term strategy to prevent expansion of the HIV epidemic. In all probability, we will not have a safe, effective preventive HIV vaccine for at least another decade. Moreover, developing a vaccine that can halt the epidemic will likely happen in stages, with the first generation of vaccines protecting some and improving over time to protect everyone. Because an estimated 95 percent of all new HIV infections occur in developing countries, we would hope to see vaccines that are long lasting, require one administration, do not need refrigeration, and are easily administered. For the medium term, we understand the importance of developing and combining other tools to expand options for slowing the spread of HIV. For example, broadening anti-HIV therapy to reduce virus levels in infected persons may in turn help prevent transmission. However, it is clear that the most powerful ultimate prevention will be by an effective vaccine, and that we have no choice but to persevere until success is finally achieved. References 1. F. Barré-Sinoussi et al., Science 220, 868 (May 20, 1983). 2. R. C. Gallo et al., Science 224, 500 (May 4, 1984). 3. M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 497 (May 4, 1984). 4. B. Safai et al., Lancet 1, 1438 (Jun 30, 1984). 5. M. G. Sarngadharan, M. Popovic, L. Bruch, J. Schupbach, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 506 (May 4, 1984). 6. J. Schüpbach, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 607 (May 11, 1984). 7. D. H. Barouch, Nature 455, 613 (Oct. 2, 2008). 8. F. E. McCutchan, J. Med. Virol. 78 Suppl 1, S7 (2006). 9. A. Garzino-Demo et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 11986 (Oct. 12, 1999). 10. D. Zagury et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 3857 (Mar. 31, 1998). 11. P. Carotenuto, D. Looij, L. Keldermans, F. de Wolf, J. Goudsmit, AIDS 12, 1591 (Sep. 10, 1998). 12. A. K. Pilgrim et al., J. Infect. Dis. 176, 924 (Oct. 1997). 13. F. Pereyra et al., J. Infect. Dis. 197, 563 (Feb. 15, 2008). 14. J. Esparza, S. Osmanov, Curr. Mol. Med. 3, 183 (May, 2003). 15. J. Esparza, N. D. Russell, in AIDS Vaccine Development: Challenges and Opportunities W. C. Koff, P. Kahn, I. D. Gust, Eds. (Academic Press, Norfolk, 2007) pp. 77-86. 16. J. Cohen, Science 318, 1048 (Nov. 16, 2007). 17. R. C. Gallo, Lancet 366, 1894 (Nov. 26, 2005). 18. J. M. Gershoni, G. Denisova, D. Raviv, N. I. Smorodinsky, D. Buyaner, FASEB J. 7, 1185 (Sep. 1993). 19. Q. J. Sattentau, J. P. Moore, J. Exp. Med. 174, 407 (Aug. 1, 1991). New Directions in HIV Therapy and Prevention—The Next 25 Years Robert R. Redfield, M.D., and William A. Blattner, M.D. Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine T he first 25 years of discovery in the field of HIV/AIDS have been unprecedented. The systematic application of new knowledge gained from basic science has revolutionized HIV medicine. What was almost universally fatal in the 1980s has now become a treatable and commonly survivable condition when appropriate care is available. Unfortunately, flawed public policies, failed investment, ignorance, stigma, and denial allowed HIV to become pandemic, with over 33 million persons worldwide estimated to be living with the virus. The vast majority of infected individuals reside in countries least equipped to manage the destabilizing impact of a still fatal condition that exacerbates other communicable diseases such as tuberculosis (1). Goals for therapy were limited initially to prevent opportunistic infections. With the addition of first generation antiretroviral agents (S. Broder, page 27) medication was used to delay the rate of HIV-induced immune damage by controlling, but rarely suppressing, viral replication. Building on the early work of Broder and others at NCI (2, 3), the biomedical community exploited key knowledge of the HIV life cycle and expanded drug de35 velopment efforts targeting key HIV viral targets (HIV reverse transcriptase, intregrase, protease, and fusion proteins of the virus). Twentyfive years after the historical publications in Science by Gallo and his colleagues (4-7 and see pages 4, 10, 14, and 18) more than 20 unique chemical compositions in routine clinical practice are providing durable therapeutic outcomes of sustained viral suppression, CD4 immune reconstitution, and new expectations of a natural life span. Therapy during the peripartum period has virtually eliminated motherto-child transmission in resource rich countries and is impacting transmission in resource limited environments when the intervention is available, showing that treatment also benefits prevention (8). As the field of HIV treatment enters the next 25 years, basic science holds more promise for therapeutic advances. As obligatory parasites, human retroviruses exploit key host pathways for successful viral replication. The recent application of siRNA techniques identified more than 250 potential host genes that impact HIV replication, far greater than the number defined previously (9). CCR5 is required for cell attachment of most viral strains; receptor antagonists are the only agents directed at host targets that have been successfully introduced as a primary HIV therapeutic in clinical practice. Drugs targeting host pathways critical to HIV replication will eventually become the back-bone of therapy and a paradigm for treating chronic human viral pathogens. 36 Treatment approaches may also target the immune system itself since HIV infection causes progressive destruction of CD4+ cells with significant immune dysregulation, and immune activation associated with disease progression (10). Thus, two primary therapeutic targets are emerging: HIV itself and immune activation. HIV exploits immune activation on multiple fronts. Cellular activation increases the efficiency of viral reverse transcription, provides opportunity for viral host chromosomal integration, increases target cell susceptibility for HIV entry by increasing receptor and coreceptor expression, and modifies optimal response of host immunity to induce novel immune responses. There is increasing awareness of the potential for the host to naturally control and suppress HIV as seen in the investigation of natural viral suppressors (NVS)/elite controllers, where host specific factors including immune effectors are responsible for and/or capable of controlling and even potentially clearing HIV replication and infection (11, 12). This is a key area for research and offers the potential of elucidating additional therapy targets. Among the greatest public health initiatives in world history, the multilateral Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and the US-funded President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) promote global HIV therapy and redress previous public policy failures. Prior to 2003, few individuals benefited from antiretroviral therapy outside of the United States, Europe, Australia, and Canada, but with global scale-up more than 2 million people living with HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa are now receiving antiretroviral therapy. Reauthorization of PEPFAR through the Tom Lantos and Henry J. Hyde United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008 was vital to sustaining progress in global health equity, and even in the troubled world economy of today, the health and economic impacts will extend far beyond the program’s 25-year horizon. Antiretroviral treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission demonstrated the efficacy of preventative regimens. Now, the role for HIV treatment as a prevention approach has been given added urgency in the face of recent failed trials for HIV vaccines and microbicides. Given unequivocal evidence for the impact of treatment on survival, initiation of treatment at the earliest phases of infection is emerging as standard practice with the added benefit that treatment-induced viral load reduction lowers the likelihood of HIV transmission. Recent public health policy recommendations are designed to optimize early diagnosis of HIV infection through routine opt-out testing. We now have an opportunity to determine if early diagnosis combined with early effective therapy in broad populations of HIV infected individuals will prove an effective strategy for preventing HIV spread (13). Since the proof that HIV infection causes AIDS in seminal papers from Gallo’s group published in May 1984, basic science has translated into public health impact by making HIV a chronic, treatable disease. The failure of public health policy to contain the epidemic in its earliest phase created a public health disaster that now demands further advances. Even if an effective vaccine were to be developed against HIV, the tens of millions already infected will destabilize health care systems and erode control of other public health threats such as tuberculosis. Innovative therapies that are suitable for public health scale-up, require infrequent dosing, avoid viral drug resistance, and do not require sophisticated medical infrastructures will come from fundamental discovery of the pathogenic lynchpin at the virus-host interface. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. References Report on the global AIDS epidemic Executive summary. http://data.unaids. org/pub/GlobalReport/2008/JC1511_ GR08_ExecutiveSummary_en.pdf H. Mitsuya et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7096 (Oct. 1985). R. Yarchoan, H. Mitsuya, C. E. Myers, S. Broder, New Engl. J. Med. 321, 726 (Sep. 14, 1989). R. C. Gallo et al., Science 224, 500 (May 4, 1984). M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 497 (May 4, 1984). M. G. Sarngadharan, M. Popovic, L. Bruch, J. Schüpbach, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 506 (May 4, 1984). J. Schüpbach, M. G. Sarngadharan, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 607 (May 11, 1984). E. R. Cooper et al., J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 29, 484 (Apr. 15, 2002). A. L. Brass et al., Science 319, 921 (Feb. 15, 2008). W. A. Blattner et al., J. Infect. Dis. 189, 1793 (May 15, 2004). F. Pereyra et al., J. Infect. Dis. 197, 563 (Feb. 15, 2008). M. M. Sajadi et al., J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. (Feb. 12, 2009). C. F. Gilks et al., Lancet 368, 505 (Aug. 5, 2006). 37 Cancers and HIV Infection: An Evolving Story Robert Yarchoan and C. David Pauza* HIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH and the *Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine T he appearance of Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS), a hitherto rare tumor in the United States, in young, never-married men in New York and San Francisco in 1981 was an early indication of the global AIDS pandemic. It soon became apparent that AIDS was associated with a pronounced increase in tumors, including KS and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The discovery of HIV and demonstration that it was the cause of AIDS (1-3 and pages 10 and 4) laid the foundation for understanding this association. HIV is not a direct agent for AIDSrelated tumors, but rather acts as a potent cofactor, largely by causing profound T-cell immunodeficiency. Curiously, this effect is directed at a relatively small number of tumors. For example, untreated patients with HIV infection before 1989 had a greater than 50,000fold enhanced risk of KS (4, 5) but no increased risk of breast or colon cancer. With the discovery of Kaposi’s sarcoma–associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV-8), it became apparent that most AIDS-associated tumors are linked to oncogenic DNA viruses (6, 7). Immunologic control of these viruses or their products is diminished in AIDS patients, allowing tumorigenesis to 38 occur. By contrast, otherwise common cancers such as breast or colon express relatively few neoantigens, and the impact of declining immune capacity was correspondingly less dramatic. Some cases of AIDS-NHL are not associated with known oncogenic viruses. HIV-induced B-cell dysregulation is believed to play a major role in their pathogenesis, although new oncogenic viruses may still be identified. Another mechanism by which HIV may contribute to oncogenesis is through the HIV Tat protein, which can stimulate tumor cell growth and enhance entry of oncogenic viruses into cells (8, 9). Studies of tumor incidence among patients who have natural control of HIV (“elite or natural controllers”) may provide important clues into mechanisms for tumor susceptibility. The identification of HIV as the cause of AIDS enabled rapid development of the first antiretroviral drugs (10, 11 and reviewed by Broder on page 27). Clinical testing soon showed that these drugs could induce immunologic and clinical improvement, and prolong the life of AIDS patients. The subsequent development of HIV protease inhibitors enabled the consideration of highly active combination antiretroviral therapy (cART, also called HAART) that almost completely blocked HIV replication. Use of cART led to a substantial decrease in AIDSrelated malignancies, especially those associated with very low CD4 counts, and helped improve survival of patients with malignancies (4). These advances were made possible by long-term commitments of the NIH, and the NCI in particular, to research on the interrelationship between viruses, immunodeficiency, and cancer. For a short period in the mid 1990s there was optimism that cART would be curative and a perception that AIDS was disappearing as a problem. We now know this is not the case—development of cART was more like the development of insulin for Type 1 diabetes, in that a rapidly fatal disease was transformed into a chronic illness with serious late complications and mortality. The yearly number of new adult HIV infections in the United States has been relatively constant since the introduction of cART and with patients living longer, the number of patients with AIDS has more than doubled since 1996 (9). As patients live longer, we are also seeing a shift toward non-AIDS– defining tumors. Epidemiologic studies show that cancer is now the most common cause of mortality in HIV-infected patients, accounting for about a third of deaths (4, 12). More than half of cancer deaths are from non-AIDS–defining malignancies. These changes are associated with a shift of HIV infection to a longterm illness with subtle immune defects. However, factors affecting trends for individual tumors are incompletely understood. For example, the incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV-infected patients is increasing (4). Lung cancer has become the most common non-AIDS–defining fatal malignancy, partly because people at risk for HIV have high rates of cigarette smoking, although immunodeficiency may also play a role. There is growing evidence that some cases of head and neck cancer arising in HIV-infected patients are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and that these cancers comprise a distinct disease subtype (13). It is unclear how these trends will play out. We now appreciate that some patients on cART develop KS and other AIDS-related tumors, even in the face of good viral control and apparent immune reconstitution. As patients live longer, their cumulative risk of developing tumors will almost certainly increase. KS and other AIDS-related malignancies continue to be major causes of morbidity and mortality in Africa and other developing regions. Thus it is important that we consider how best to prevent and treat these tumors. The recent development of vaccines against HPV have demonstrated that tumors can be prevented by effective vaccination against the causative viruses (14). Vaccines against other key viruses 39 such as KSHV and EBV would hold promise for preventing a large fraction of AIDS-related tumors. Viruses may also provide unique targets by which to attack viralinduced tumors; understanding viral biology and tumorigenesis may yield novel and effective therapies. It will be important to study if and how the treatment of various cancers should be modified in the setting of HIV infection. To facilitate this effort, the NCI has recently undertaken an initiative to reduce barriers to the entry of HIV-infected patients with common cancers into clinical trials. Finally, there is a need to clarify how HIV affects natural tumor surveillance and consider approaches that correct these defects. Thus, while cancers are emerging as an increasingly common cause of death and morbidity in HIV-infected patients, basic and translational research holds the potential to reduce this burden in patients with HIV disease. The Interface of Cancer and HIV/AIDS Vaccines: Both Preventive and Therapeutic 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Jeffrey Schlom, Douglas Lowy, and John Schiller Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland References F. Barré-Sinoussi et al., Science 220, 868 (May 20, 1983). R. C. Gallo et al., Science 224, 500 (May 4, 1984). M. Popovic, M. G. Sarngadharan, E. Read, R. C. Gallo, Science 224, 497 (May 4, 1984). E. A. Engels et al., AIDS 20, 1645 (Aug. 1, 2006). J. J. Goedert et al., Lancet 351, 1833 (Jun. 20, 1998). Y. Chang et al., Science 266, 1865 (Dec. 16, 1994). R. Yarchoan, G. Tosato, R. F. Little, Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2, 406 (Aug. 2005). B. Ensoli et al., Nature 345, 84 (1990). Y. Aoki et al. Blood 104, 810 (2004). H. Mitsuya et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7096 (1985). R. Yarchoan et al., Lancet 1, 575 (1986). F. Bonnet et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. 48, 633 (Mar. 1, 2009). R. Zelkowitz, Science 323, 580 (Jan. 30, 2009). D. R. Lowy, J. T. Schiller, J. Clin. Invest. 116, 1167 (May 2006). This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCI (R.Y.) and PHS grant CA113261 (C.D.P.). T o date, the most successful vaccines targeting cancer have been those that prevent disease induced by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV). The induction of neutralizing antibodies appears to be the key protective activity for both vaccines. Liver disease from HBV involves successive rounds of viral replication, offering multiple opportunities for the vaccineinduced systemic neutralizing antibodies to act. By contrast, genital HPV causes a local infection whose individual lesions, once established, do not appear to be altered by neutralizing antibodies (1). Like HBV, HIV induces chronic systemic infection, and most efforts to develop preventive HIV vaccines have focused on reducing systemic infection of T cells (2). The success of the HPV vaccine suggests that preventing initial anogenital mucosal infection may be an attractive alternative vaccination strategy. The HPV virus-like particle vaccine trials demonstrated potent sterilizing immunity in the genital tract, thus overcoming justified skepticism concerning the prospects for a successful prophylactic vaccine against a local genital mucosal infection (3). 40 Sexual acquisition of HIV usually results from a single infectious event, and HIV has low rates of heterosexual transmission, estimated to be 1 per 200-2000 exposures (4, 5). Inefficient trafficking to its initial target cell, due to slow rates of diffusion through mucus, might be a major contributing factor to low transmission rates (6). Further decreasing virion diffusion rate, via vaccine-induced antibody/virion complexes, might further reduce the likelihood of transmission, especially as HIV is a rapidly inactivated enveloped virus. The antibodies would need to have reasonable affinity, but need not prevent virus infection of cultured cells. It should be considerably easier to design immunogens that generate this less restricted class of virus-binding antibodies. Also, virus escape through mutation would be difficult if, as expected, a broad spectrum of virion binding antibodies were able to retard diffusion. Vaccines that could induce secretory IgA (sIgA) may be more potent, since sIgA, but not IgG, appears to specifically bind mucus (7). Incremental challenge dose-escalation trials in monkeys may be required to fully reveal the activity of this type of vaccine. They might appear ineffective using the high challenge doses required 41 to ensure infection of all control animals after a single exposure. Most recent attempts to develop HIV vaccines have focused on preventing what the virus does best, destroy T lymphocytes. Perhaps more attention should be focused on what it does most inefficiently, initiate infection. It is encouraging that an antibodymediated vaccine can be so effective against HPV, a virus that appears to be more efficient at sexual transmission than HIV. As yet, no therapeutic vaccines for cancer or HIV/AIDS have been approved by the FDA. There have been many more cancer vaccine clinical trials thus far carried out and consequently a larger accumulation of knowledge concerning therapeutic vaccines. The differences in these two diseases are obvious and numerous, but there are some lessons learned in the field of cancer therapeutic vaccine development that may have implications in the development of an AIDS vaccine. Evidence of patient benefit in the use of cancer vaccine trials has not yet been translated into FDA approval; the reasons include: (a) several Phase 3 trials were conducted with earlier generation, less potent vaccines; (b) they employed patient populations with advanced disease and often prior therapies that damaged their immune system; (c) endpoints were shrinkage of visible tumor lesions. There is now evidence that vaccines may readily slow progression of indolent disease or low burden disease, leading to increased 42 survival. Recent studies show that continuous boosting is possible and appears to be beneficial to keep the immune responses from succumbing to down regulation. Thus a paradigm shift in cancer vaccine development has occurred (8), particularly regarding patient populations and clinical endpoints. Since most tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are self-antigens, which are non- or weakly immunogenic, the major thrust of cancer vaccine development has been to improve the potency of the immune response to the TAA. Strategies employed to this end have been: (a) the use of dendritic cell vaccines, vector-based vaccines containing multiple T-cell costimulatory molecules, and the addition of cytokines to the vaccine regimen, (b) altering specific amino acids of the TAA to produce enhancer agonist epitopes, and (c) diversified prime and boost regimens. These more potent vaccines not only induce higher levels of T-cell responses, but also greater T-cell avidity. Cancer is a spectrum of diversified cell types and within each cancer type multiple TAAs have been identified. Perhaps HIV/AIDS vaccines should not focus entirely on viral antigens, but evaluate the HIV-infected cell as the “target.” Recent advances in immunotherapy of cancer suggest that virally induced self-antigens may also serve as targets for T-cell mediated attack. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. I. H. Frazer, D. R. Lowy, J. T. Schiller, Eur. J. Immunol. 37 Suppl 1, S148 (Nov. 2007). B. D. Walker, D. R. Burton, Science 320, 760 (May 9, 2008). J. T. Schiller, X. Castellsague, L. L. Villa, A. Hildesheim, Vaccine 26 Suppl 10, K53 (Aug. 19, 2008). F. Hladik, T. J. Hope, Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 6, 20 (Feb. 2009). R. E. Haaland et al., PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000274 (Jan. 2009). A. Phalipon et al., Immunity 17, 107 (Jul. 2002). J. Schlom, P. M. Arlen, J. L. Gulley, Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 3776 (Jul. 1, 2007). A. Hoos et al., J. Immunother. 30, 1 (Jan.2007). Identifying of patient populations most likely to respond effectively to vaccine therapy is critical. Prior to vaccination, the number of effector cell populations should be analyzed, along with their ability to respond to relevant antigens; the number and function of regulatory T-cell populations should also be evaluated. Similarly, analysis of serum cytokines and chemokines has shown to be of some predictive value in defining appropriate target patient populations. 43 May 9-11, 2009 University of Maryland School of Medicine and the National Cancer Institute PRESENT THE SYMPOSIUM 25 Years After DISCOVERING HIV AS THE CAUSE OF AIDS Baltimore Marriott Inner Harbor at Camden Yards Baltimore, Maryland May 9, 2009 AN EVENING HONORING Robert C. Gallo, MD Hilton Hotel Baltimore, Maryland For more information: Call 410-706-8503, or visit www.Gallo25.umaryland.edu Rwanda A country devastated by genocide and a crippling AIDS epidemic. Together with the Rwandan Ministry of Education, AAAS is working to ensure that local children gain skills in science, technology, math, and engineering. And this is just one of the ways that AAAS is committed to advancing science to support a healthy and prosperous world. Join us. Together we can make a difference. aaas.org/plusyou May 9-11, 2009 Honoring the Accomplishments of Robert C. Gallo at the National Cancer Institute and the Institute of Human Virology JOIN THE SYMPOSIUM 25 Years After Co-Sponsored by the University of Maryland School of Medicine, E. Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA, Dean, and the National Cancer Institute, John E. Niederhuber, MD, Director DISCOVERING HIV AS THE CAUSE OF AIDS Organizing Committee Honorary Chairs: Myron Essex, DVM, PhD, and William Haseltine, PhD Saturday, May 9, 2009 Welcome E. Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA, Dean, University of Maryland School of Medicine Introductory Remarks John Niederhuber, MD, Director, National Cancer Institute Opening Remarks Bernadine Healy, U.S. News and World Report, Former Director, National Institutes of Health Scientific Session Introduction to the 25th Anniversary of Discovering HIV as the Cause of AIDS Max Essex, DVM, PhD Tools that laid the foundation for discovering human retroviruses Chairs: Arsene Burny and Yiming Shao, PhD Tom Waldmann, MD The Common Gamma Chain Cytokines Induced by HTLV-I Tax are of value in the treatment of Cancer and in Molecular Vaccines for Cancer and AIDS Jean Claude Chermann, PhD Origins of Human Retrovirology The first human retroviruses and cancers they cause — HTLV1 and HTLV2 Chairs: William Blattner, MD, and Mitsuyaki Yoshida, PhD Lee Ratner, PhD HTLV Tax, Transactivation, T-Cell Activation, and Tumorigenesis Mitsuyaki Yoshida, PhD Kuan-Teh Jeang, MD, PhD Three decades of HTLV-1 research: Insights into Adult T cell leukemia and cellular transformation mechanisms Lunch Break Retrovirus research enabling the identification of human oncogenes Chairs: Luigi Chieco-Bianchi, MD, and Isaac Witz, PhD Carlo Croce, MD Oncogenes, Retroviruses and Human Cancer Stuart Aaronson, MD Translating Gene Discovery to the Clinic Discovering HIV and Proving the Association with AIDS Chairs: John Niederhuber, MD, and Bernadine Healy, MD Harold Jaffe, MD The Early HIV / AIDS Epidemic in the United States: Views from Hollywood and Atlanta Luc Montagnier, MD New Prospects for Treatment and Prevention of HIV Infection Anders Vahlne, MD, PhD On The Discovery of Human Retroviruses Robert C. Gallo, MD Lessons of the past and applications for the future Clinical science, HIV pathogenesis and the emerging retroviral syndrome Chairs: Robert R. Redfield, MD, and John Bartlett, MD Sam Broder, MD Therapy of Pathogenic Retroviruses: Past, Present, Future Anthony Fauci, MD HIV / AIDS — 1985 thru 2009: The Evolution of the Science Reflections on 25 Years of AIDS Advocacy — A Tribute to Martin Delaney and the Work He Inspired Chairs: Robert C. Gallo, MD, and John Moore, PhD Brenda Lein, Director, Project Inform Martin Delaney and AIDS Advocacy Mark Harrington, Executive Director, Treatment Action Group Reflections on 25 Years of AIDS Advocacy — A Tribute to Martin Delaney and the Work He Inspired Closing Remarks William Haseltine, PhD, William Haseltine Foundation For the full Symposium schedule, please visit our website at: http://www.gallo25.umaryland.edu/program.doc
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz