PERFORMANCE RESULTS Rosemary Hills Elementary School See student data sheet Baldrige Guided School Improvement Plan 2015-2016 STUDENT AND STAKEHOLDER FOCUS As a result of the data analysis, it was determined that students need instructional staff to: Provide daily opportunities for students to engage in differentiated instruction and demonstrate thinking and academic success skills in an equitable environment. Based on detailed data analysis from multiple sources: Student performance data – multiple and varied measures Focused classroom observations of instructional practice and the impact on all students Teacher reflection FACULTY AND STAFF FOCUS Theory of Action: If we build staff capacity to plan opportunities for all students to engage in differentiated instruction and develop critical thinking skills, then student achievement will increase. Team Leaders will need professional development: Analyzing student data, with a lens on equity, to engage teams in reflective examination of practice. Facilitating meetings and modeling critical thinking strategies (Making Thinking Visible (MTV) Guiding staff members in reflection of cultural proficiency and critical thinking practices. Teachers will need professional development: Strategies for supporting guided, small group instruction & meaningful follow-up work in all content areas. Equitable practices with an emphasis on small group instruction and student discourse. Resources that support questioning, analysis, synthesis and evaluation (MTV). Questions that drive critical thinking during small group instruction. Elementary School LEADERSHIP The vision of Rosemary Hills is to foster lifelong learners by caring for and nurturing the whole child. The mission of Rosemary Hills is to foster a community of caring that nurtures the development of the whole child academically, socially, and emotionally by enabling all students to become lifelong learners and productive citizens. MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS, AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLANNING Rosemary Hills’ students will achieve or exceed proficiency standards through our focused efforts on daily small group instruction, differentiation and critical thinking. We will focus on improving the achievement of underperforming student groups to reduce performance/opportunity gaps, with a specific focus on Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, LEP, FARMS and special education students. Reading Goal: All students in K-2 will meet or exceed end-of-year benchmarks on the spring 2015-2016 MCPS-AP PR (mClass) assessment. We will reduce the difference in performance by 15% between: K 1 2 Asian (100%) & Hispanic/Latino (78.3%) Asian (100%) & Hispanic/Latino (79.2%) White (92.1%) & Hispanic/Latino (46.4%) 2015-2016 78.3% (21.7) 79.2% (20.8) 46.4% (45.7) 2016-2017 79.9% (20.1) 80.7% (19.3) 49.8% (42.3) 2017-2018 81.6% (18.4) 82.3% (17.7) 53.3% (38.8) Math Goal: All students in K-2 will demonstrate growth on the MAP-P assessment by the end of the 2015-2016 school year. We will reduce the difference in performance by 15% between: K 1 2 Asian (avg RIT 188) & Hispanic/Latino (avg RIT 153) Asian (avg RIT 192) & Hispanic/Latino (avg RIT 176) Asian (avg RIT 208) & Hispanic/Latino (avg RIT 181) 2015-2016 153 (35) 176 (16) 181 (27) 2016-2017 155 (33) 178 (14) 183 (25) 2017-2018 158 (30) 179 (13) 185 (23) Cultural Proficiency Goal: We will narrow the achievement gap through the use of disaggregated data analyses and culturally proficient teaching strategies to meet the needs of diverse learners. Staff Engagement Goal: All staff will collaborate to create an atmosphere where all staff feel their opinions are valued and considered when making decisions about our school. MCPSAP-PR (mClass) MAP-P Weekly collaborative team planning meetings Monthly common formative assessments in reading, writing and math Monthly grade level PLC meetings/data chats Formal and informal observation data Walkthroughs/instructional rounds Teacher anecdotal notes/checks for understanding EWI, including attendance data MAP-P assessment data MCPSAP-PR (mClass) assessment data MIRL WIDA Gradebook PBIS referral data Student voice survey data Staff voice survey data SLO data & reflections Staff engagement consensograms PROCESS MANAGEMENT The following structures and processes are implemented and monitored and upgraded to meet the needs of all students: Master schedule that allows for supported classes, collaborative planning opportunities. Weekly collaborative team planning for implementation of Curriculum 2.0, determining levels of proficiency and analyzing data. Planning meetings are supported by the grade-level team leader, SDT, reading specialist and/or administrator. Monthly grade level PLCs aligned to SLOs in literacy and mathematics. PLCs will serve as the vehicle for staff to engage in data chats and the study of critical thinking, differentiation, meaningful follow-up and equitable practices needed to close the performance gap. Monthly PBIS PLC with a focus on student referral data, student voice surveys, class meetings, cooperative recess games and monitoring of consistent practices and positive language throughout the building. Monthly staff meetings focused on professional development based on staff needs. Peer observations to examine the impact of the small group instruction and implemented strategies. Focused observations by instructional leaders with feedback/reflective conversations. Individual SLO data chats with administration. Walkthroughs/instructional rounds, with a lens on equity and aligned to the instructional focus.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz