:;<'= 2010, Vol. 18, No. 1, 151–161
Advances in Psychological Science
(r1stm':;'u, vw 430079)
(Counterproductive Work Behavior, CWB)
!"#$%&'()'*+,-./01
23435678*9:;<=!
>*9(?@*+9A12
BCDE, FG5
HIJKL, MHNOPQRSTUVWXUYZS[\U]
^_`a!
PVWX]9PYZS[\]Hbcdefgh, ijkl
ej
QRSTmnobcpYZS[
!
qCDE, $/012
B
35>r, st$uv12w435x$Zyz{94|!
; }*IJ; QR-S[KL; oB~**+
B849: C93
1 ghˆ›, Aœ”‘!˜‡
, ˆy|, žŸ( ¡¢£I¤, ¥¦
!"
§¨, ©ª«¬£­®¯w3fde#*,
#$%&'()*+#,—— -
T‰°±
./01234(56789:#;
¸VS¹§w3fde#*, º»
²³´#µ¶¥¦·
<), =56(task performance), >?/0@
¼½
A B , = (behavior
nstVÁ, ÂÃDEFvw3
²³´, ¾vw3¿À
performance) (Campbell, 1990)C
, ÄÅuIwÆÇfÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐ
D E F G H I (discretionary work
mÂNя›Ò*ÓWvw3š
behaviors) J K L M (extra-role
Ѐ
work
, ¡ÔÕÖf×h€
Mvw3Ž
behaviors)NO9PQRS-T, UVC
ÓØ)Ù&, ÅuÚÛ7Y[7hÜÝ
WDEFGHIXYZ[\1)H
ÞßIwÆÇà«á̤Ìâãäå
I]^J_2, `abcdef
hfæç, T‰Åvw3è-
g h , i j k l (Organizational
éßêë€
Citizenship Behavior, OCB); 2)HImno
îf¤ï, Cð€
pq, `arstJu^#G
ò›Òóô
] b , i j v w 3 (Counterproductive
vw3I¤ñ
2 Work Behavior, CWB) (Spector & Fox, 2002)
2.1 xy, DEFklW_c
Fox, Spector f Miles (2001) Wvw3
RSzaI{, |vw3}VS~
RSzaI{€
vw3ì¤Ìâí
1×õÚÛñ4, $vw3
, kl
DEFö÷ø–ùf, úûüý72þ
#'(‚ƒ„…, |vw3†‡
̒7fàVSÀJ#G¿
ˆ‰ŠN‹Œ, Ž#‘
t, Ì|12f×
ö÷
’“”Œkl•–—‘!˜™š
œ)Ù&, Z2Wvw3Ì
ècDEFG›tJ
2009-04-08
u^#G(Spector & Fox, 2002)[
, E-mail: [email protected]
151
:;<'=
-152-
2010 >
, Gruys f Sackett (2003) Wvw3´Ò
Å)?#2,t), |vw3ë
@õ]bŽG›
aaŠA7ST(©, U­VWXk*YZ[
œVÁ, ´vw3‰,
tk*]b)
›(›t))cœ, VCWvw3
\ M 1@v w3 ã] ^ ÚÛ ´Ò\GDEFË›t
_ ` (deviation behavior), C 8 G ]bJ@]bu^#G
ab, VSÀzadcJ
ê, yvw3
ú´y
u ^ # G ¿ t H I (Robinson &
cI¤f:jF, '(+#
Bennett, 1995)d´Ò"e, Z
¸!%\1) vw3GHI, "
faAg, hi`B
ÑjÂ(-T_
!&
Hc#Ô-$J-kzÅ%N&A;
`kâa
2) v w 3 N › “ v w 3
lÇm, |vw3ë›t
(counterproductive)”——=t]b, ¾v
JFu^#GnÆdMHÑ
w3'(; 3) vw3Å)VC
&e, opq:¡,”zAœ, -r
, ”VC@]bŽu^#G
ÄsÅ_`@vw3tX
(©, &*)
Y, WoàTe%(Sackett, Berry, Wiemann, &
2.2 Laczo, 2006; Marcus & Wagner, 2007; Kaplan &
Ôñ‡, +*,¿À|-,
Bradley, 2009)¾V/N'BO4, gu
VCWvw3ÃklÅ.Ô,
", žŸÅDEFø–IwÆÇ
kl`aÅb, |vw3}
ˆ, Â(ì3cvÅënÆ
aaÅt(Dalal, 2005)/N0, 1
, vw31×õqÚÛì34Ñ
vw3z2ñ4j, +'(ì3
w"wF
ˆDEFVSst]b
2.3 G
, u F + / 0 ü ý (aggression
v w3 C 8 DE FG ›
behavior)74·(violence behavior)756
tJ@]bu^#G
(retaliatory behavior) à
ùf⹏FÅq, Œ
(Neuman & Baron,
1998; Giacalone & Greenberg, 1997; O’leary-Kelly,
xWÚ0qvw3XY
Griffin, & Glew, 1996)Aœ, 7NÅvw3
[y, CÅȗFÅq×hfù
m
@&8ÚÛjŠ9T̂ƒ7Y:f;
z'#IÑ, vw3NCO
<
p÷-TY[#2
m
"=, üýOG>›ÅF
{ ÷ Y[# 2 vw 3 H
u^#G?#t; 4·'O?#
Ñ#2, ¶¾÷|(¬}—ABY:
@Âë, JAÅ^2?#t('B,
#"XYvw3[y~©, Spector
t)üý; 56C8}G
f Fox (2002) `ŀx5‚ƒÌ
DE‡-kz (injustice)ëFÅßuG
ABY:‡âvw3 5 ÷[y, /0ü
H(gh)÷IJq(Neuman & Baron,
ý7„Å77f…†; Neuman f Baron
1998; K.L , MN , 2007; Skarlicki & Folger,
(1998) } } —‡Y , W v w3 X Y „
1997)¾
ÚÛ@vw3XBN
Ñ
Å7~fkyüýFox à2(2001)}`Å
COZ1#Ô\1) Å)-T, üý74
2F4ÑEvw3̈‰f
·f56`aPÅ)(N
×h, ÄÅ4тƒÌABY:, ‡â
'´#G), |vw3Å)aa
vw3 5 ÷[y\1)Š‹^2(‹ŒfŽ
QR, VC'´#G, ”VC
qíÜà), 2)(t‘’à), 3)“”(•
*,; 2) ë-T, üý74·f
–à), 4)op(>›4—à), 5)˜(
56ë`aA7Mx(©, AÀ
à)
18 1 xyz{1|}~€‚:;ƒ„
{ o÷ Y[# 2T ‰ vw 3 Å
-153-
Ì v w 3 ‰ } X - T à K , ³
)fq™@šm~©, Robinson f
œjŠÄ-̒Åvw3Y[
Bennett (1995) `›œ‡âvw3
ˆ”ñô2Ÿ, 1×õqÚÛ, Åv
Z1°m, =Å)(Ov>12)
w3Ì´äÄ-õµþ
fq™@šm(ži>@Â)PQ¾
F, 7NPQÂ(-T¶·õµ
Z1°mŠ-Tõ, ^ŸWvw3XY
Y[#2, Åvw3̑FÅq
4 ÷-T[y, /0\1)Ov12žmt
, 2)Ov12@Ât, 3)Ov
žmt, 4)Ov@Ât
{ ‡÷ Y[# 2 vw 3 nqšmSpector f Fox (2002) $VCWv
w3XYnvw3@€nv
w3C8AOvÅ)=
‰q, ~©, ¡&*; ëC8›
, ŽÅ¢£7¶¤‰Šƒ¥, ©¦§¨
­(©‡fªà)cnqvw3
aar«,IJ, G¬­vcË€n
3 3.1 -
v w 3 ¸ · - ; ¹ Q y (the stressoremotion model, S-EM)vw3GH
2Z Spector à2º§-üý»0f¼AhÜ
)Ù&ùzñ4º§-üý»0$, 12
Ñ89šFE½†º§VSšIuŽ?
üýqv?; ¼AhܑÌO4, @¾y
Jf>›†ºŽ‚, ¿
€EÀ>›fÁÂ
†ºWšI†º‘7‘Ãüýqv
vw3
®&E8, vw3*,6¯q°±
?)cœ, Spector à2W&8ÄŚÐ
Åu[yÌ
N²A&8‡÷
, ñ4⸷-;¹Qy, —cÝÞDEF
-TY[#2, )*úûâvw3Y
º§;¹v?(©, ÆÇ)7$EšCßvw3
[E|(-TY[#2GHâ
jŠã(Spector & Fox, 2005)
1 |}~€…!-†‡q(Spector & Fox, 2005)
¸·-;¹Qy$, vw3Iw
‡¸·(†ºD)‰, ØršIŽ?Ìq;¹
š‡1ÈÉ#\1)1
ÅDEF¸·
[, Ìq;¹Åvw3, ”r†
;Ê(©, cËÂ5672þ̒à)Ì
‡
ABÉ, /0hÙÇDf²Y2Ú
$Eíî, 3w†ºD; 2)†ºDšI1
Ì
'™('™ÆÇ7'™ÍÎà)~©, TÛÆ
q;¹v?(©, ÆÇ7ÍÎà); 3)Ìq;¹«Ï
ÇÜÝO, '™ÆÇÞ1
WVSHÑ4‘
šÐvw3Iw( 1)VÁ, vw3
7‘Ãvw3v?
Iw«ÑÒHDEF¸·;Ê, A¸
3.2
!"##$
·;ʚIÌq;¹7NÓÔ/N0
Martinko à2(2002)ñ4AßhhÜ
, ÄfE¸·;ÊPršÐ1
Ìq;
(the causal reasoning theory, CRT)—cÝÞv
¹v?¾ÈɆ‡$EíîÆÇ(Õu¼A
w3\1hÜQy(Martinko, Gundlach,
š)É, Ö¸·;Êc×#1
EÀ
& Douglas, 2002)àhÜñ4)c Martinko
:;<'=
-154-
à2Å2×hY:, ^ŸIÑZ1
2010 >
¼Aœ)Ù&, ^Ÿñ4â—cÝÞvw
¸ÈÉVSDEF1
;¹f
3IwAßhhÜ, $V2Åvw3
v?\1) 1
ÅDEF
IwÆÇZãäÝÞ, ‘§{o
-áâEÀ
(©, -ká7-kz); 2) 1
Å&8-áâEÀ
ãä¼AÈÉ( 2)
2 |}~€ˆ‰Š;;‹(Martinko, Gundlach, & Douglas, 2002)
Å -á âEÀ ¼ A šIv w3 ù´1
k¶·Ëvw3Cߏ˪
åNn·, ¾(AßhhÜ-T
÷#2vw3(
¼A#2r3w-TÅÌqæÔÌ
²Ovop)¸AB
²OvHêt@M
²¼Aaç,12ÅHèø–
é, /0H
®&E8, ł—cÝÞvw3¸·
êk´fë_D(Martinko & Gardner, 1982); v
-;¹QyfAßhhÜVE, oú
", ÅÌqæÔM²¼AVSšI56q
º§Ô1
;¹v?, Õu1
$ìæ>›j
w3IwÆÇFûüÂNKL, ÖjÂ
ÄíÈÊF?¢̒Óԉ(Martinko &
Zellars, 1998; Weiner, 1995)ŲA³´q@k
¼AN1
ðï, ©ç,ÌqæÔ
²A€$³´7-V׉, 1
W­vc
$¾-hÅÜ<r¶¤OAœ, A
ßhhÜ$, 1
DEF
é‡h&
-áâ‰\1)©Å¾÷-áâDÌ
²7
²¼Ašf;¹v?v
(-T¸·-;¹QyAšIvw3
Ìq;¹v?, |AßhhÜ}1
Å
-áâD¼Aš™&, oÅvw3
IwÆÇhÝ,, Pýþ˜;Ê
$E§;¹v?vw3
4 ³´q¼A(©, S·`), W¹§1
H,Ov
DEF[ø–, vw3
vw3(©, ïqë_7ðñfòZó—
* , V C à ø – (Lievens,
à)IwVSq; 2)©Å¾÷-áâDÌM
Conway, & Corte, 2008)vw3Hc
²7³´q¼A, Äí$>›j|Uî“
M, uÅ]btu'(IwAœ,
Ž?¢̒Óԉ(©, ôõ4ö7(aJO÷
xâÝvw3IwÆÇ, CðÉf
ç), WšIøüý756fàM²O
rDEFvw3Iw, vw3
vvw3œVÁ, AßhhÜ$,
Í(×õ—cÝÞvw3h
ÅDEF
é‡-áâD¼Aš
ÜQyVE, $E§f;¹v?v
18 1 xyz{1|}~€‚:;ƒ„
-155-
w3IwÆÇF¸ÈÉ, m
HÑ1
d¾Z1¸ÈÉÐ, +VCƒ<­hÝv
¸·;ÊO¼AšßÌq;¹v?
w3IwÆÇ( 3)
3 |}~€3}ƒ„Œ
4.1 %#&
vw3ÒHDEF¸·;Ê, ¸·;ÊÖvw3M²&A, ¸·;
ʚI¸·DؚIvw3h
AÅvw3hA
”vw
3(ê, †ˆƒh
AN-kzD7¯›Df¯
à
4.1.1 '()*+,
D E F , - k z (organizational
injustice)šI1
¸·D«aÁ¸·;Êj
, ”vw3ÂN&A1
EÀ‡
DEFÅHè-]-kz‰, WÌHê
×, ×h&-kzD, |¾÷×aa
`}Xvw3"Ñ(Robinson & Bennett,
1999)
4.1.2 -./01,
›D € $ G H
ÑÂNAB1 1975 u, Mangione f Quinu
+IÑ, 30 C&q€xF, ›D@vw3Iwx̎ág
”ôâ[ã, vf
zúIÑ, ›DVCxÉ
v
w3Iw, G›DO®‰­
v c 5  ‘  v w 3 (Hammond, 2008;
Judge, Scott, & Ilies, 2006)c›DÅv
w3ÌvÉ
—T۝‡â!Y:
z"¶, #)c 25 1, $ß 6106
~Û*%Q!Y:IћD@v
w 3 j Š Ž ã % -0.28, ä & x (Dalal, 2005)›D1
ÅÑÜ«
1995; Spector & Fox, 1999; Conlon, Meyer, &
|íîO9, ”1
â'@12jŠ(
Nowakowski, 2005)ÅAßhhÜ|(,
)ãÂN*+"Ò-Å%aa,
-kzD1
DEFEÀ‡
žŸ›DO®, Ì|¹§vw3I
÷y-áâD, ¼A-, +VSç
wVSq
,vw3Iw'(Œ,
4.1.3 -'(23
GEÀ‡-kz‰, ‘VS3wÆ
â 'G Å Ý m 1 Â
Ç7àÌq;¹, ï56, ÄíË/0
NO9GÅ-áO®, ›.Ÿ^
7opk!YZ7àvw3"Ý
Ÿ/¤067t1؛2O®, Ž?,
¾
Ì q ; ¹ (Skarlicki & Folger, 1997;
Ëtc]bvw3VSq”
Greenberg, 1990; Skarlicki, Folger, & Tesluk,
+¹§#)c 10 1Ž, $ß 3543 ~
:;<'=
-156-
Û*%Q!Y:zH, @vw3
2010 >
”wÞ2, ­vcŀ>?Ë‘t
j Š Ž ã % -0.15, ä & x (Meyer,
(Cohen-Charash & Mueller, 2007)
Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky, 2002)\
4.3 6789
#$ßÛ*‘!Y:}IÑâ
D EF ¸· ;Ê ç, h& ¸ ·
@vw3jŠ‘ÌŽã, Žã
D, ¸·D̚IÌq;¹v?, Ìq;
%+-0.36, ä&x(Dalal, 2005)
¹«ÏšI›t]b, ¾vw
ê, cDEF¸·;ʚI¸
3IwñòâõhLMy|, þF
·Dvw3IwhA¾zÜ, '
vw3IwÆÇN6¯cu^A
(‡â#34"¶¾VÂ(
BŽN—, &8š5ÈÉPVS†‡
æç‡1×'†‡ˆƒžŸ
, īχvw3Iwc¾
I¤, gu"w"wá×'€5Ї
ABÄ-A­—cvw3, |`
vw3hAF", uF+/0
ȼvw3Iwš, ŠA3w,
h677Œ82gh(abusive supervision)à
Aœ, ¾V, OW^Ÿäivw3
(Mitchell & Ambrose, 2007; Tepper, Henle,
IwÆÇFÉ×', /0ÙÇ(7¼APÚ7
Lambert, Duffy, & Giacalone, 2008; Dupre, Inness,
2Ú'™7ø–;DßHêíîà
Connelly, Barling, & Hoption, 2006)¾
#
4.3.1 :;<=>
•9Wêëvw3ÉfÈÉñ
?@
A ß hhÜ W1 Å D EF EÀ ‡
òî:Oç
-áâ¼AšÃvw3Iw
4.2 %#45
¸ÈÉÙÇ(f¼APÚÅvw3
`ÔY:VE, DEF¸·;
+N`1
¼Aš"Ñº§
ʚI¸·DÖvw3Iwñò
Ô, Mك
ّ­vcÌM²¼A,
âh&VSþF, ¾÷¸·DÅvw
d|‘VSšI[vw3v?@
3`aP/N`Ìq;¹(negative
vw3]^Ž¼APÚN‡÷\Q
emotions) F æ  Ñ (Fox, Spector, Goh, &
|Ò¼APÚ7ø–¼APÚf„›¼AP
Bruursema, 2007; Martinko, Gundlach, & Douglas,
Ú
2002)(;Þ-áÌq;¹2‘!˜<=cø
–ÜÝ, ”‘­vcËvw3
1 1982 u, Martinko f Gardner +ñ4â
Q|Ò¼APÚ(NHÑïqë_),
Æ Çf >? '( ‡  " ¶ V
IѶ¾÷¼APÚ2‘VSHÑ4îR7S
CAšIvw3Z÷Ìq;¹Judge
T7UVfðñàvw3@Q|Ò¼
à2(2006)H, GEÀ‡-kz
APÚ[, Selligman 1990 uñ4âø–¼A
‰, ÆÇ;¹VCx­zvÉ
PÚ, $mø–¼APÚ2}­vcÅW
vw3
²7³´q¼Axy, mø–¼A
Iw>?O12î“^24@A
XÌ
™7#+JY3‰, –m[BCJD
PÚ2‘VSË1
H,Ovvw3
ï^2”î“[BC;¹(Parrott & Smith,
(Martinko, Gundlach, & Douglas, 2002)ë",
1993)>?/0@Ž^2HE, ÷
âC81
ÅWXÌM²7³´q¼AÄ$
fa-FG;¹
é, >?r}—áâHè
u>›j­v, Douglas f Martinko (2001)
@Ž^2jŠHI#2"®¯u>?-á,
ñ4â“„›¼APÚ” (hostile attribution style)
|«a—áâ#2+tŽ^2I
º§Ô, ¶“„›¼APÚ”1
‘!˜3
Ñ, ›t^2è>?ÂNv?,
wÆÇ;¹, ­vcË‘56qXvvw
Wrø–JK#G, ¹§ªàvw
3(©üý7à)
3(Duffy & Shaw, 2000)œM, EÀ‡
4.3.2 A@BC
-kz;ÊO
é>?‰, >?šIø–
v?r¹§; é‡-kzDwÞ, >?-á
D
5ªM²Iw, PVS†‡1
7³´2Ú'™AB, vw3”
18 1 xyz{1|}~€‚:;ƒ„
-~M'(‡, @vw3Iw
-157-
ƒŽ, ÞHêSDEF†º‰Ë
]^Ž2ÚABN\¬Y2Ú7õ™q
4·7üýàvw3VSq‘ÞA, ;D('™ÆÇ7ø–;D)f56­và
º§Ô, ÞHêS­vcÌH]q¼A
¬Y2ÚHñ4C", ͆Z
ˆ, ”vw3ÂNÉ
ABH
(self-serving attribution), |¯HêS­vc
ÌH[q¼A(self-effacing attribution)
, [\qf]2q@7Y3op7aà
á‰, ©m2mnHjf¬Hê
vw3xŽ, |;¹³´q7Mvqf
SD, HêíîÞ, êŸVC$uHo
ì^q}@vw3F…†(>›_`7
œVÁ, 1
Ho-ánVS@uD
>›€Ýaà)xŽ(Salgado, 2002)
EFËvw3]^Ž†º‰, ÞH
ø–;D(Negative affectivity, NA)÷õ
oƒ¯Ho‘!˜
é‡ÆÇ;¹, ”+‘
™q;D(Dispositional affect), O12¥ð(;
VSËvw3©, Ho>VCÉ
ÆÇ7b7„›fÍÎàÞ¸·;¹­v
p q (job constrains)f v w 3 j Š ã ,
(Watson & Clark, 1984), m‰Šf;ʳ´
pq@‰, ÞHo‚¯Ho5r
qÞø–;D1
ÅDEFÌq˜
Ë‘vw3(Penney & Spector, 2002)
‘cD, º§Ô‘!˜
é‡
d7b7
ÆÇ7ÍÎfefàÌq;¹, d|‘VSË
vw3(Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988)¾
zÜ'(‡!Y:Ñ鐫g
#!Y:IÑ, ø–;D@vw3j
ŠŽã%+ 0.30, ä&x(Kaplan, Bradley,
Luchman, & Haynes, 2009)@ø–;D­v[,
'™ÆÇ-áÞ7˜˜g1
DEF‘
!˜Ëüýàvw3(K.L, MN,
2007)
Hêíî(core self-evaluation)1
`
@z^2JM²hi#
cHè)*zÜ, /0Hjf¬HêSD
Z1#Y(Judge, Locke, Durham, & Kluger,
1998)HêíîÅvw3ÉN`
1
ź§D¼A"Ñ
IÑ, º§Ô, ¯Hj­vcH
\fUV, |ÞHj­vckÕ2, ‘VS
Ë56Xvvw3(üý7Šlà)
$, ÞHj­vcW†º¼M²7
-³´q²A(©, dõ), ¯Hj}­vc
²7³´q²A(©, S·)
(Martinko & Zellars, 1998)|\
H 2000 uCë, €Mvw3
¬'sÑ, •9⃄…hÜf#
, –¬­§Ïâ2ŸÅvw3hÝy
|, €
Åvw3ˆt>g
uæ
;, ëÜÅvw3*,âÝ>Ž
PycÐãä, #’“|
€
Mvw3ÑÜ, O$yè
Œ%ÏÐ
f:­#
5.1 JKL=MNOPQRSTUVWX
4.3.3 E%FGHI
W†º¼
5 }$
#, Õu
'#, Ç7v
w3I¤ÂNAB-Tc`a5
6Jkl, nopqu|
&¹§âÅvw3Ìv
'
wmC›œN#xävw3
F, pqy22›5HèËƒ
vw3=±Tۛ, ..Ö*
+ˆ‰Km-T, /0GHífÂ^2í
î ( T æ f & z ), « ë z  + V S - T
(Stewart, Bing, Davison, Woehr, & McIntyre,
2009){|}f@Ó~(2008)rh‚ƒvw
3
'Hí7^íf2态‡÷#
]‚, $?PQ%'(¶·õµ
íîÒ)cœ, gu", ì3ƒx;
, ÞHjƒ¯Hjº§Ô‘VSË
ÊQ„é#`é…Å;ÊÌ
4·füýNA, ÞHjÅVS¿
Q„, WVCƒ$­Ýù†riŒq›-
"‘’*+‘cD, d|!˜3w‘˜Ã;
, ‡&é;ʉ, ´N¶·VC|
¹fv?(Cohen-Charash & Mueller, 2007)
ˆfu|'£O9, Ö¾ÛØSµv
¬HêSDÅvw3@Hj‚
w3
'vq
:;<'=
-158-
/NO4, ›œf;ʏéZ÷#
2010 >
12ÃK, Ö1
G
‰Š‹$ŽÅ, Œ}—5ª÷#, P
DEFËvw3¾´šm&vŸ
-V”ŽèŽ?îf-écvw3
âvw36¯q, Äí”VCÉ
, ¾Û
*,S‘q, O$, ©ƒxÑ
Ü<W¶¤ƒ¥‰Šy|, DEF
›œJ;ʏé)Ù&, šÐÏm’“,
>[vw3TÛ-!§Ã, ¿+C¨
WVC‡ƒ$Ïm’“ÂғG@
ŒHËvw3
†’jŠ”$ã•., |*5¾ã
!’“GVC`’“v–Cß
’“ðNn#R—†’*5, ø˜†
1 20 h© 50 uG, Meyer à2+ª
«¬­VIÑâFfz2¨
è
u, «¬éF, ®¼, ±/
’h™Î, d|ßn’“šÏÐ, —
0ÓÔß5¯Y°#2à
‘§š7›œ¾Ïm’“
é±•–—²šz!³+VCÃ
ö÷
4‰(, ›œf;ʏé#xywC
Cfz2¨
ŒHËvw3Ž‚
t‡¾(
C 1 2 Œ H Ë v w 3 , C ¨ Œ
\M, xävw3pqPÔ
HËvw3À]b¿t”
&Ž, Åvw3nÝqˆ-
Œ‘¬; v", ©Sž­®¯C¨
žÓF'(ñ‡, €nvw3`aƒ
ŒHvw3, À¿1
S‘7¶¤‰Šƒ¥, Âvën$­v
ؔ+‘¬Aœ, êë/¤dG12ÃKÌ
Ÿ¾'(, Õuxôvw3A
v w 3 T ‰ , ´ Â Ã ì ¤ ) c
‰ , nwt‡v¡ÖvV
¨
ÃKvw3Wfa7N7
Cƒ$­¢£¾-é, Äí>VCÌAß
î:
)cœ, O•¤, êëÌvw3
5.4 hij#Kk, lmnopqRS
‰, ÓÔVñO, ?ì¤v
v w3 j EC w "w E
ˆ, N²Acghµ/Nn
5.2 RSYZ[\], ^_`Ya
ø–, vw3r[t]b
Ôñ‡, vw3/0G›
Aœ, ©ª­ÉfÈÉ, +vw3
tJ@]bu^#Gù
Nn·E, ¾”ÂÃv
f, è÷Y[#2¾´šm&v?â
w3IwÆDzAÅvw3I
vw3*,6¯q, T‰”ñô
wÆÇ
, Åvw3ËÉfÈÉ
þF?àˆ›FÅqŒm
,
ñgu", vw3A7Fæ
yP÷cvw3b¥, öH
ßÉ×''(•9⃄…#
ABfë×'”Œ:¡-Û~©, -r
, ¾
zÜWñÅGvw3
—Ä-
ÌÉfÈÉñò›Òóô~©, ,, P*²Ac-TEvw3
IÑ, Þø–;DG‘VSËJ4
Â(-T, um
‡m
·àvw3, Äí¸·ø–;D@v
FôqBÅvw3É
(©‡fîR), qBÉ
Ôæç‡
'´vw3
Ž,\M,
w3jŠûüFæKL(Spector & Fox, 2002;
vw3É×', þ
Kaplan, Bradley, Luchman, & Haynes, 2009)Aœ,
F, ¦1É×'—úFÅ'´vw3
VCƒxdZ1#ÔÅvw3ÌÉ
Aœ, Åvw3Ì´äÄ-õ
fÈÉ\['”Ža¶ø–;DƒÞá
µ, þF, C'´÷[vw3
2; o['
rDEF¸·Ò, JÅ
Å), ÌFÅqÏÐf
W
GÌFÅq¸·gh·¸¹º)cœ,
‘î:
©ªÅ'#Ìø£™ˆ, Äí@gh
5.3 bcdefgRS
x äv w3 ë ~M P )c G
µÌ‘e]zõ, 중?—Xv
, Wêëvw3Â(
18 1 xyz{1|}~€‚:;ƒ„
5.5 %=rs4tuvw]xyz{
Douglas, S. C. and Martinko, M. J. (2001). Exploring the role
5ªšÌ, Õu?—
, P뻔¼Ó£›€Mv
w3#'(n„…, €
Ž
؋‹Ð, @F€xäÓ£Œ
›%;<~©, Cf½F
€, DEFvw3, Õu2þXv
vw3k‘§S‘7wC
'¾|Cfz
2¨
ŒHvw3kƒC#‘3
4¾Rotundo f Xie (2008) `‚ƒIÑ, F€
gh@¿ÀghÅvw3
-159-
úhÝ
)*,, ÅO÷×
ÌíÁ‰,
of individual differences in the prediction of workplace
aggression.
Journal
of
Applied
Psychology,
86(4),
547c559.
Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2000). The Salieri syndrome:
Consequences of envy in groups. Small Group Research,
31, 3–23.
Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., Connelly, C. E., Barling, J., &
Hoption, C. (2006). Workplace aggression in teenage
part-time employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91,
987c997.
Fox,
S.,
Spector,
P.
E.,
&
Miles,
D.
(2001).
Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to
job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator
F€gh‘ÂÀíî56, tÅu
and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of
vw3ƒr¾Ñ)k†‡Cf
Vocational Behavior, 59, 291c309.
½¾\M, F€Ó£ÂO, vw
3k-TcC#HÑ#2¾vw3
—ÆÇk”-T¾ùj, 1
cÐãä, ͛à%
f;<, ”Ö;<â¾
›, ØVSÄ
‡šzµõcF€ghþvw3É
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., & Bruursema, K. (2007).
Does
your
Convergence
coworker
of
know
self-reports
what
and
you’re
doing?
peer-reports
of
counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of
Stress Management, 14, 41c60.
Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial
Behavior in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to
fÈÉ#
underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts.
|rw}
Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561c568.
Ž, ‘r. (2008). ]’|}~€“”•8. Gruys, M. L. & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the
dimensionality
, 31, 936c939.
–—˜, ™š. (2007). Uz›œ€“”ž. of
counterproductive
work
behavior.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11,
30c42.
, 29(9), 42c49.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction
Hammond, G. D. (2008).The relationship between job
problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M.
attitudes and counterproductive work behaviors: The
D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of
moderating influence of attitude strength. A thesis for the
Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1,
degree of Master of Science, Wright State University.
pp. 687c732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists
Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role
Press.
Cohen-Charash, Y., Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived
unfairness
exacerbate
or
mitigate
interpersonal
counterproductive work behaviors related to envy. Journal
Conlon, D. E., Meyer, C. J., & Nowakowski, J. M. (2005).
How does organizational justice affect performance,
withdrawal,
and
&
J.
counterproductive
A.
Judge, T. A., Scott, B. A., & Ilies, R. (2006). Hostility, job
Colquitt (Eds.),
model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 126c138.
Kaplan, S., & Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D.
J.
(2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in
Handbook of
job performance A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of
behavior?
In
Organizational Justice (pp. 301c327). Mahwah, NJ:
Applied Psychology, 94, 162c176.
Lievens, F., Conway, J. M., & Corte, W. D. (2008). The
Erlbaum.
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship
between
of core self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology,
83, 17c34.
attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multi-level
of Applied Psychology, 92, 666c680.
Greenberg
Judge, T., Locke, E., Durham, C. and Kluger, A. N. (1998)
organizational
citizenship
behavior
and
relative
importance
of
task,
citizenship
and
counterproductive performance to job performance ratings:
counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied
Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of
Psychology, 90, 1241c1255.
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 11c27.
:;<'=
-160-
Marcus, B., & Wagner, U. (2007). Combining dispositions
and evaluations of vocation and job to account for
counterproductive
work
behavior
in
adolescent
job
apprentices. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,
12, 161c176.
2010 >
856c877.
Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A., & Laczo, R. M.
(2006).
Citizenship
and
counterproductive
behavior
clarifying relations between the two domains. Human
Performance, 19, 441c464.
Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1982). Learned
Salgado, J, F. (2002). The big five personality dimensions
helplessness: An alternative explanation for performance
and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of
deficits. Academy of Management Review, 7, 195c204.
Selection and Assessment, 10, 117c125.
Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002).
Toward
an
integrative
theory
of
counterproductive
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the
workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and
workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective.
interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10,
434c443.
36c50.
Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality
Martinko, M., & Zellars, K. (1998). Toward a theory of
as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and
workplace violence: A cognitive appraisal perspective. In
retaliation.
R.W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly & J. M. Collins (eds),
100c108.
Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations: Violent and
Deviant Behavior. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
(2002).
Affective,
continuance,
of
Management
Journal,
42,
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., & Van Katwyk, P. T. (1999). The role
of negative affectivity in employee reactions to job
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky,
L.
Academy
and
normative
characteristics: Bias effect or substantive effect. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 205c218.
commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model
antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of
of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between
Vocational Behavior, 61, 20c52.
counterproductive
Mitchell, M. S., Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision
and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of
negative
reciprocity
beliefs.
Journal
of
Applied
Psychology, 4, 1159c1168.
Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace violence
and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific
forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of
Managements, 24, 391c419.
organizational
work
citizenship
behavior
behavior
(CWB)
(OCB).
and
Human
Resources Management Review, 12, 269c292.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model
of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E.
Spector
(Eds.),
Investigations
of
Counterproductive
actors
and
work
targets
behavior:
(pp.151c174).
Washington, D C: American Psychological Association.
Stewart, S. M., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Woehr, D. J., &
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996).
McIntyre, M. D. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder: A
Organization motivated aggression: A research framework.
non-self-report measure of workplace deviance. Journal of
Academy of Management Review, 21, 225c253.
Applied Psychology, 94, 207c215.
Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the
Teeper, B. J., Henle, A. C., Lambert, S. L. Duffy, M. K., &
experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality
Giacalone, A. R. (2008). Abusive supervision and
and Social Psychology, 64, 906c920.
subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied
Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2002). Narcissism and
counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean
Psychology, 4, 721c732
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The
bigger problems? International Journal of Selection and
disposition to experience aversive emotional states.
Assessment, 10, 126c134.
Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465c490.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of
Watson,
D.,
Clark,
L.
A.,
&
Tellegen,
A.
(1988).
deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling
Development and validation of brief measures of positive
study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555c572.
and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of
Rotundo, M., & Xie, J. L. (2008). Understanding the domain
Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063c1070.
of counterproductive work behavior in China. The
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of Responsibility: A foundation
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19,
of a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.
18 1 xyz{1|}~€‚:;ƒ„
-161-
The Psychological Mechanism of Counterproductive Work
Behavior in the Workplace
LIN Ling; TANG Han-Ying; MA Hong-Yu
(School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
Abstract: Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) is an intentional behavior of the organization members,
hurts colleagues or organizations’ legitimate interests. This research takes a more comprehensive review of
the
newly
research
evolvement
on
the
conception,
classification
and
theory
explanation
of
Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in the Workplace. Based on studying those existing theory and
empirical research, we bring forward the mechanism model of how Counterproductive Work Behavior
(CWB) takes effect (cause, mediator & moderator), which follows the logic of “environmental stimulate →
cognitive processing →negative emotion reaction → Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB)”.
“Cognitive processing” and “negative emotion reaction” are two key points on the mechanism model,
concretely representing individual’s attribution process and negative emotion reaction under the
environmental
stressor.
Based
on
this
model,
we
integrate
newly
empirical
research
about
Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB), carry through pertinence evaluation and provide useful
expectation for future research.
Key words: counterproductive work behavior (CWB); psychological mechanism; the stressor-emotion
model; the causal reasoning theory