Lincoln Drivers Report Spring 2012 Foreword The Lincoln Drivers Report is an annual report of the City of Lincoln Council which encompasses a breadth of information, and focuses on the key demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of, and challenges to, Lincoln. In doing this, it acts as the evidence base behind the City Council’s Strategic Priorities. These are: • • • • • Reducing Poverty and Disadvantage Seek to Increase the Supply of Affordable Housing to Rent or to Buy Improve the Council’s Housing Landlord Function Reduction of the City’s Carbon Footprint A ‘Fit for Purpose’ Council This report is aligned to these Strategic Priorities where possible but does differ in some areas for consistency with previous reports. Examples of this include the merging, in this report, of the priorities concerning Affordable Housing and the Council’s Housing Landlord Function, as well as Carbon Footprint with general information on the environment and heritage. Additionally, “A ‘Fit for Purpose’ Council” was considered outside the remit of this report as it does not directly relate to quality of life issues within the city as a whole. The Lincoln Drivers Report uses information sourced from the City Council, as well as other organisations. This enables the City Council, along with all its partners, to use this information when developing strategic direction, creating and implementing policy, and ensuring resources continue to be targeted effectively. In essence, it is a valuable source of summary information, all contained in one document. It draws and collates information from across the full range of quality of life factors and so paints a unique picture of what it’s like to live and work in the city. The report is therefore a vital tool to use when planning the delivery of services across the public sector. Further Information Your views are important to the Council. If you have any comments on this report or require further information, please use the contact details below: Write to: James Wilkinson Policy Unit (CX) City of Lincoln Council City Hall Beaumont Fee Lincoln LN1 1DD Email: [email protected] Page 1 March 2012 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary........................................................................................4 2. Map of Lincoln Ward Boundaries ..................................................................6 3. Our Population ................................................................................................7 3.1 Lincoln’s Growing Population ......................................................................7 Migration................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Ward Level Population .............................................................................. 12 3.3 Student Dwellings in the City..................................................................... 13 4. Reducing Poverty and Disadvantage .......................................................... 14 4.1 Relative Deprivation .................................................................................. 14 4.2 Our Economy ............................................................................................ 16 Child Poverty ......................................................................................... 16 NEETs ................................................................................................... 18 District Unemployment .......................................................................... 19 Ward Unemployment............................................................................. 20 Income................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Our Safety ................................................................................................. 22 Crime..................................................................................................... 22 Antisocial Behaviour .............................................................................. 24 4.4 Our Education ........................................................................................... 25 Key Stage 1 ........................................................................................... 25 Key Stage 2 ........................................................................................... 26 Key Stage 4 ........................................................................................... 27 University Students................................................................................ 28 Adult Qualifications................................................................................ 29 Page 2 4.5 Our Health ................................................................................................. 30 Female Life Expectancy ........................................................................ 30 Male Life Expectancy ............................................................................ 30 Ward Level Life Expectancy .................................................................. 31 Additional Health Indicators ................................................................... 32 Physical activity ..................................................................................... 33 Mental Health ........................................................................................ 34 5. Our Carbon Footprint, Environment and Heritage..................................... 35 5.1 Emissions across Lincoln .......................................................................... 35 5.2 City Council Emissions .............................................................................. 36 5.3 Brownfield Land......................................................................................... 37 5.4 Natural Environment.................................................................................. 38 5.5 Heritage..................................................................................................... 38 6. Our City’s Housing and the City Council’s Landlord Function................. 39 6.1 House Prices and Affordability .................................................................. 39 Housing Affordability.............................................................................. 40 Mortgage and Landlord Possession Orders .......................................... 41 6.2 Affordable Homes...................................................................................... 42 Recently Built Affordable Homes ........................................................... 42 Stock of Affordable Homes .................................................................... 42 6.3 Waiting List and Lettings ........................................................................... 43 Waiting List by Type .............................................................................. 43 Number of Lettings by Property Type .................................................... 44 Average Weekly Rents .......................................................................... 44 Council Tenants in receipt of Housing Benefit ....................................... 45 7. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 46 Page 3 1. Executive Summary Lincoln is a small, densely populated city of 36 square kilometres, and an estimated 89,700 residents. It has recently received national attention when Steep Hill was awarded the Great Street 2012 award by the Academy of Urbanism. With a young population, it differs in demographic character from the rest of Lincolnshire. The city’s young population is likely to be contributed to by the present of large educational establishments such as the University of Lincoln. Like many places, Lincoln is made up of areas of relative affluence, and relative deprivation. The Indices of Multiple Deprivation tells us that 7 areas of the city (from a total of 57) are amongst the most 10% deprived nationally. Many of these areas have a proportionately large young population. In terms of the economy, Lincoln continues to face a number of challenges. One of these is Lincoln’s relatively high rate of child poverty, with approximately one quarter of all children classed as living in poverty. Additionally, Lincoln’s high rate of 16-18 year olds not in education, employment or training, and high unemployment claimant rate, impact on the economic well-being of people in the city. Lincoln has, in recent years, experienced an overall reduction in crime. Despite serious acquisitive crime, which tends to be crime that results in material gain, showing increases in 2010/11, early 2011/12 data showed signs of reductions, particularly in regard to burglary (dwelling). The number of requests made to the City Council regarding antisocial behaviour has fluctuated over the last 3 years. Educational attainment has increased at Key Stages 1, 2 and 4. However, despite the gap in attainment between Lincoln and Lincolnshire appearing to decrease at Key Stage 4, the differences in attainment at Key Stages 1 and 2 have shown signs of widening. Positively, a high proportion of University of Lincoln graduates have succeeded in moving on to further study or employment, with many being employed in Lincoln or close by. Additionally, estimates suggest adult attainment has increased in Lincoln, with Lincoln performing above the regional standard at all NVQ levels. Female life expectancy in the city is increasing, and although it still lags behind the national rate, the gap is showing signs of decreasing. In contrast, although male life expectancy is also increasing, there are signs of a widening gap between Lincoln and the country. Additional health indicators relating to premature mortality show Lincoln has a higher rate than England for certain diseases, although the data suggests this gap could also be decreasing. The estimated tonnes of carbon emissions per capita in the city remains low in comparison to the rest of Lincolnshire and the East Midlands. Part of this is due to Lincoln’s comparatively low emissions in regard to road transport. This is perhaps unsurprising when we consider Lincoln’s road network covers approximately 280 kilometres, compared to the county road network which Page 4 covers approximately 9,000 kilometres. A positive picture can be seen in regard to brownfield land in Lincoln, which has seen a 49.9% reduction over the last 9 years. Whilst some of this reduction may be attributable to changes in the definition of what is included as brownfield land, the figures are still indicative of an overall reducing trend due to development of brownfield land in the city. In terms of the city’s heritage, Lincoln’s 36 square kilometres is steeped in history and character, and one part of the city recently received national attention when Steep Hill was awarded the Great Street 2012 award by the Academy of Urbanism. In 2010, average house prices across Lincolnshire, the East Midlands and England showed signs of increasing. In contrast, the average house price in Lincoln continued to fall; meaning house prices in Lincoln remained more affordable in comparison with resident pay than many parts of the country. Nevertheless, with latest pay data suggesting a fall in peoples’ incomes, affordability may become an increasing issue in the future. Despite this, since 2008, the numbers of landlord and mortgage possession orders have, overall, reduced, despite figures showing Lincoln compares worse compared to the county, region and country. The high number of households on the housing waiting list shows continued demand for affordable housing. Page 5 2. Map of Lincoln Ward Boundaries Page 6 3. Our Population 3.1 Lincoln’s Growing Population Since 2000, the population of Lincoln has increased by 5.5% to 89,700 in 2010 (4,700 people). This compares to an increase of 6.1% across England. In just one year (from 2009 to 2010), Lincoln’s population was estimated to have increased by 1.4% 1 . This was due to an estimated net migration of 700 people, a higher birth rate than death rate, as well as natural change 2 . Lincoln's Increasing Population 91,000 90,000 Total Population 89,000 88,000 87,000 86,000 85,000 84,000 83,000 Mid-2002 Mid-2003 Mid-2004 Mid-2005 Mid-2006 Mid-2007 Mid-2008 Mid Year Estimate Source: Office for National Statistics (2011) 1 2 LRO (2011) 2010 Mid Year Estimates Population – Quick Reference Sheet ONS (2011) Mid 2010 Population Estimates Analysis Tool Page 7 Mid-2009 Mid-2010 The physical nature of Lincoln as the principle economic locality within a large rural county, and the presence of a university with over 10,000 students studying within the city, along with more than 400 students studying just outside in the Lincoln Riseholme campus 3 , has impacted upon the make-up of Lincoln’s population (more discussed later in this chapter). There are an estimated 11,600 20-24 year olds living in the city, and people aged 15-29 make up 29% of the total population. This is in contrast to the 20% that 15-29 year olds make up across the United Kingdom 4 . The Population of Lincoln by Age 14.0 12.0 Thousands 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 Quinary Age Bands Source: Office for National Statistics (2011) 3 4 University of Lincoln (2011) Key Facts about the University of Lincoln ONS (2011) Mid 2010 Population Estimates Page 8 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ Lincoln’s population is estimated to increase by 5.4% (to 94,500) by 2030. As the Population Pyramid shows below, it is not expected there will be a large change in the proportion of people in their early 20s, however, a reduction in the proportion of people in their late 40s and early 50s is expected to be met with an increase in the proportion of people aged in their mid 70s and above 5 . Source: Office for National Statistics (2011) NB. The lines on the Pyramid chart above show our current position, whereas the shaded areas show our estimated 2030 position. 5 ONS (2011) Population Projections to 2030 Page 9 Migration The estimated population of Lincoln changed from 88,500 in 2009 to 89,700 in 2010. This was calculated by a number of factors such as births, deaths, natural change, and net migration. The net migration during this period was estimated to be +700. This was the net result of people moving into and out of Lincoln, from elsewhere in the UK or abroad 6 . To put this in the regional context, Lincoln net migration accounted for 58.3% of the total estimated population increase, compared to net migration accounting for 53.0% of the total increase in population across the East Midlands. Therefore, proportionately, net migration is having a marginally higher impact in Lincoln than the regional average. However, the fact Lincoln is a university city is likely to impact on the churn of people moving into and out of the city. This potential reason is supported by internal migration estimates that suggest a significant number of internal migrants (from elsewhere in the UK) aged 18-24 come to Lincoln 7 . Migrant worker inflow National Insurance registrations by overseas nationals provide us with a good indication of country of origin of foreign workers. Across Lincolnshire in 2010/11, DWP data showed there to have been approximately 6,440 registrations made by overseas nationals across Lincolnshire. About 1,130 of these were in Lincoln. Of these it is estimated: • • • • • • • 69.6% were from EU Accession States (e.g. Latvia, Lithuania, Poland) 12.5% were from Asia and the Middle East 11.6% were from EU Countries 2.7% were from Africa 1.8% were from the Americas 0.9% were from other European Countries 0.9% were from Australasia and Oceania The most common countries of origin in 2010/11 were: • • • Republic of Latvia (about 250 registrations) Republic of Lithuania (about 240 registrations) Poland (about 230 registrations) 6 ONS (2011) Mid-2010 Population Estimates components of change ONS (2011) 2010 Numbers to and from each LA in England & Wales from and to the rest of the UK 7 Page 10 The gender split of National Insurance registrations by overseas nationals in 2010/11 was: • • 55.4% male 44.6% female 8 Limitations of National Insurance data as an indicator of migration National Insurance registrations by overseas nationals only make up a part of incoming international migration. For example, some migrant workers may have entered the UK as refugees first. Additionally, whereas it is a good measure of inflow of migrant workers, it does not measure outflows of the same people. Furthermore, the data does not show how many other people may have migrated to the UK with the applicant. For example, some migrant workers may have brought family members, while others may have entered the UK alone. Worker Registration Scheme The worker registration scheme began in May 2004 to collect information on workers from the 8 EU Accession States registering for jobs in the UK. However, around a third of migrants nationally may be missed from this data due to unemployment, self-employment, or not registering. What data there is for Lincoln in 2010/11 provides an indication of employment types. It shows the majority of those who registered on this scheme in Lincoln worked in lower skilled jobs such as process operatives, followed by farm workers / farm hands, and then cleaners / domestic staff 9 . The presence of farm workers / farm hands as an occupation suggests some migrant workers may be attracted to Lincoln partly due to job opportunities in the agricultural sector surrounding the city. 8 DWP (2011) National Insurance registrations by overseas nationals ONS (2011) WRS Registration data cited by LRO (2011) International Migration in Lincolnshire 2010/11 9 Page 11 3.2 Ward Level Population Ward Level Populations 14,000 11,732 12,000 Population 10,014 10,000 7,843 7,327 7,202 8,000 7,201 7,409 8,651 7,271 7,340 6,501 6,000 4,000 2,000 rk Pa be ar ts ho lm e M in st er M oo rla nd H G le Ab be y Bi rc hw oo d Bo ul th Br am ac eb rid ge C ar ho lm e C as tle 0 Ward Source: Office for National Statistics (2010) NB. Numbers will not add to 89,700 as ward estimates are from mid-2009 estimates. NB. Mid 2009 Quinary Estimates for 2009 Statistical Wards Revised used. Lincoln’s most populous wards are those surrounding the city centre. If combined, Abbey, Carholme and Park account for one-third of the city’s total population. As noted on page five, Lincoln has a young population, which is particularly concentrated in wards east and west of the city centre. In Carholme ward, the 15-29 population is estimated to account for approximately half of the ward population. In addition, approximately one-third of the population of Abbey and Park is estimated to be aged 15-29. In contrast, the highest occurrences of residents aged over 65 are in Minster and Boultham wards, where this age group accounts for approximately twofifth of the total populations in each area 10 . 10 ONS (2011) Mid 2009 Population Estimates Page 12 3.3 Student Dwellings in the City As already noted earlier in this chapter, the large student population living within the city has impacted upon the demographic character of Lincoln. Since the establishment of the University of Lincoln in 1996, the student population has continued to grow. A significant amount of purpose built on-campus and off-campus accommodation meets a large proportion of the demand. However, a substantial number of students also rent accommodation within the private sector. Ward/Area Student dwellings (not purpose built) (2006)* Student dwellings (not purpose built) (2008) Student dwellings (not purpose built) (2009) Student dwellings (not purpose built) (2010) Student dwellings (purpose built) (2010) Number of residential addresses (2010) Student dwellings (not purpose built) as % of ward dwellings (2010) Student dwellings (purpose built) as % of ward dwellings (2010) Council tax exemption records identify the largest concentration of students in the non purpose built private sector to be in the wards of Carholme and Park, although figures also show that most students living in Carholme live in purpose built accommodation. There are high numbers in Abbey, Boultham, and Castle wards; however they make up a smaller percentage of the total dwellings in the ward 11 . This helps build a picture of areas such as Carholme, Abbey and Park which are identified as having a young population. Abbey 126 198 152 194 21 6094 3.18 0.34 Birchwood * * * 11 * 3725 0.30 0 Boultham 77 46 32 37 * 3504 1.06 0 Bracebridge * * * * * 3159 0.25 0 Carholme 423 520 441 466 668 6309 7.39 10.59 Castle 72 100 90 88 * 4075 2.16 0 Glebe * * * 13 * 3299 0.39 0 Hartsholme * * * * * 3015 0.33 0 Minster 21 19 13 23 * 3754 0.61 0.21 Moorland * * * * * 3443 0.26 0 Park 266 186 133 153 * 4412 3.47 0 Total 995 1,084 875 1,012 697 44,789 2.26 1.56 Sources: City of Lincoln Council, Council Tax 2010. *calculated using previous (1999) ward boundaries which were revised in 2007; City of Lincoln Council, Council Tax 2010 * Figures 10 or below have been suppressed. 11 Planning Policy, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Student Dwellings information Page 13 4. Reducing Poverty and Disadvantage Poverty and disadvantage is a multifaceted issue that cuts across a number of socioeconomic and quality of life indicators. The first section of this chapter looks at the findings from the 2010 Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) which highlights the areas of the city that are considered relatively deprived. Then the issues of child poverty, economic wellbeing, safety, educational attainment and health are explored. 4.1 Relative Deprivation The IMD is a national dataset that ranks areas in the country in terms of relative deprivation. These areas are known as Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs), of which there are 32,482 in England. Lincoln is made up of 57 LSOAs; with each ward in the city comprising of either 4, 5 or 6 of these areas. It is useful to look at data at this spatial level as it helps highlight issues closer to a neighbourhood level than ward analysis allows. In the 2007 IMD, there were 5 LSOAs in Lincoln that were ranked within the most 10% deprived areas in England. In the 2010 IMD, this number increased to 7 LSOAs. Of these, 5 were ranked within the most 5% deprived, and one was ranked within the most 1% deprived 12 . Population estimates tell us that approximately 10,000 residents live in these 7 areas ranked within the most 10% deprived areas of the country. Source: Department for Communities and Local Government (2011) NB. Population numbers will not calculate to 89,700 as LSOA estimates are from mid-2009 estimates. 12 DCLG (2011) 2010 Indices of Multiple Deprivation Page 14 In terms of the demographic make up of these 7 areas, it is interesting to note the particular concentration of certain age groups in areas considered relatively deprived. The bold percentage figures below show high concentrations of either a young or old population (relative to citywide proportions). It emphasises that the geographic distribution of deprivation not only adversely impacts some communities; it can also have a particular impact on specific personcharacteristics. In this case, we can see that deprivation in parts of Birchwood, Glebe and Moorland will, due to the demographic make up of the areas, particularly impact young people, and conversely, in Castle and Glebe it will particularly impact people aged over 65. LSOA amongst 10% deprived England Proportion of LSOA aged under 16 Proportion of LSOA aged over 65 LSOA 26 Abbey ward 14% 14% LSOA 27 Birchwood ward 27% 12% LSOA 29 Birchwood ward 34% 6% LSOA 50 Castle ward 20% 22% LSOA 52 Glebe ward 31% 8% LSOA 57 Glebe ward 18% 22% LSOA 73 Moorland ward 30% 12% 13 Lincoln 17.1% 14.1% 14 NB. Mid 2009 citywide estimates have been used to correlate with LSOA population data. These proportions may therefore differ slightly from data shown in the chapter on demographic information. 13 14 ONS (2011) Mid 2009 Population Estimates cited by LRO (2011) ONS (2011) Mid 2009 Population Estimates Analysis Tool Page 15 4.2 Our Economy Child Poverty Child poverty is defined as the proportion of children living in families in receipt of out of work benefits or in receipt of tax credits where their reported income is less than 60% of median income 15 . The proportion of children living in poverty in Lincoln in 2009 (24.5%) was higher than the national, regional, and county averages, and showed a marginal increase from the previous year. When just taking into account under 16 year olds, the rate increased to 25.3%. Out of 326 authorities in England, Lincoln was in the top 25% of authorities with the highest levels of child poverty. The London Borough of Hillingdon had the same proportion of children living in poverty as Lincoln 16 . The Proportion of Children in Poverty 30.0% 24.5% 24.0% 25.0% 20.9% 21.3% Proportion 20.0% 18.4% 19.1% 15.9% 16.8% 2008 15.0% 2009 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% England East Midlands Lincolnshire Area Source: HMRC (2011) 15 16 HMRC (2010) Technical Information for NI 116 HMRC (2011) Child Poverty in 2009 Page 16 Lincoln In terms of the spatial distribution of child poverty, it was highest in Glebe, Moorland and Birchwood wards – areas of which were highlighted as relatively deprived in the IMD 2010. This shows a similar picture to the 2008 results 17 . The Proportion of Children in Poverty in 2009 40.0% 34.8% 35.0% 30.7% 29.0% 30.0% 27.4% 26.1% 24.3% Proportion 34.4% 25.0% Wards 16.5% Lincoln 20.0% 15.7% East Midlands 15.0% 10.3% 8.7% 10.0% 5.0% Bi Ward Source: HM Revenue and Customs (2011) 17 HMRC (2011) Child Poverty in 2009 Page 17 Pa rk Ab be y rc hw oo d Bo ul th Br am ac eb r id Ca ge rh ol m e Ca st le G Ha leb e rts ho lm e M in st er M oo r la nd 0.0% NEETs The proportion of 16-18 year olds not in education, employment or training (NEETs) has historically been above the county rate. This trend has continued into 2012. In January 2012, the Lincoln rate was 7.7%, higher than the overall Lincolnshire rate of 4.1%. In numerical terms, this accounted for 241 16-18 year olds in the city. Proportion of 16-18 Year Olds Not in Education, Employment or Training 9.0% 8.0% Proportion 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% Lincoln 4.0% Lincolnshire 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% Ja n12 De c11 No v11 Ju l-1 1 Au g11 Se p11 O ct -1 1 Ap r- 1 1 M ay -1 1 Ju n11 Fe b11 M ar -1 1 0.0% Month - Year Source: Children’s Services, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) Below is a chart showing the wards in the city that had the highest NEET rates in January 2012. In Park and Birchwood the NEET rate accounted for more than 1 in 10 18 . Wards with the Highest Proportion of 16-18 Year Olds Not in Education, Employment or Training in January 2012 14.0% 12.2% 12.0% 10.1% Proportion 10.0% 9.5% 8.5% 8.4% 8.0% Ward Lincoln 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Park Birchwood Minster Glebe Abbey Ward Source: Children’s Services, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) 18 Children’s Services, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) Proportion of 16-18 Year Olds NEET in January 2012 Page 18 District Unemployment In the previous drivers reports unemployment has been measured by International Labour Organisation defined figures. A change in the supply of data means that this drivers report focuses on the number of people claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance, as a proportion of working age residents. This has resulted in unemployment data in this report not being comparable with previous drivers reports. For this reason, the data below covers a large time period. The unemployment claimant rate in Lincoln has remained consistently above both the regional and national rates, and has generally followed the same trend. In January 2012 the unemployment claimant rate in Lincoln was 5.3%, compared to 3.9% across the East Midlands, and 4.0% across England 19 . Number of JSA Claimants as a Proportion of Working Age Residents 6.0 Unemployment Claimant Rate 5.0 4.0 Lincoln 3.0 East Midlands England 2.0 1.0 Ja n0 Ap 8 r- 0 8 Ju l-0 O 8 ct -0 Ja 8 n0 Ap 9 r- 0 9 Ju l-0 O 9 ct -0 Ja 9 n1 Ap 0 r- 1 0 Ju l-1 O 0 ct -1 Ja 0 n1 Ap 1 r- 1 1 Ju l-1 O 1 ct -1 Ja 1 n12 0.0 Month - Year Source: Office for National Statistics (2012) 19 ONS (2012) Unemployment Claimant Rate January 2012 Page 19 Ward Unemployment The unemployment claimant rate differs across the city, with rates as high as 8.7% and 7.2% in Abbey and Park respectively, compared to rates as low as 3.0% and 3.1% in Bracebridge and Hartsholme respectively. Between January 2011 and January 2012 the proportion of people claiming JSA rose in each ward of the city, with the exception of Minster 20 . Number of JSA Claimants as a Proportion of Working Age Residents 10.0 9.0 Unemployment Claimant Rate 8.0 7.0 Jan-11 6.0 Jan-12 Lincoln Jan-12 5.0 East Midlands Jan-12 4.0 England Jan-12 3.0 2.0 1.0 Pa rk oo r la nd M in st er M G le be Ha rts ho lm e Ca st le e ge Ca rh ol m Br ac eb r id Bo ul th am rc hw oo d Bi Ab be y 0.0 Ward Source: Office for National Statistics (2012) Disparity between wards with the highest and lowest number of claimants When taking into account numbers of residents claiming JSA, once again Abbey features as the worst performing ward with 508 claimants, compared to only 155 in Bracebridge 21 . 20 21 ONS (2012) Unemployment Claimant Rate December 2012 ONS (2012) Unemployment Claimant Count December 2012 Page 20 Income Latest income data shows a sharp drop in income for Lincoln residents, reducing by 13.2% (£2,663 pa) from £20,156 in 2010, to £17,493 in 2011. This runs contrary to marginal increases in income in both the East Midlands and United Kingdom. A note of caution should be provided with this data. The data comes from a small sample of employee jobs. When broken down to a small geographic area such as Lincoln, the robustness of the data declines. Additionally, it does not include people who are self-employed. Due to the nature of this survey it is usual to look at recent trends in order to see if the most recent data marries. In this instance, it does not follow the historical pattern, or wider geographical patterns of Lincolnshire, the East Midlands, or the United Kingdom 22 . Annual Gross Pay by Residence £25,000 Annual Gross Pay £20,000 Lincoln £15,000 Lincolnshire United Kingdom £10,000 East Midlands £5,000 £0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Source: Office for National Statistics (2011) There are a number of potential reasons why the data could show a sudden slump in average pay in Lincoln. As already noted, the data comes from a small sample of the national population, and therefore loses confidence at a low geographic area such as Lincoln. Additionally, ONS estimates suggest a significant number of people in Lincoln work in West Lindsey and North Kesteven. Therefore, the average workplace salaries of external geographic areas can impact upon the earnings of Lincoln residents. However, analysis of workplace salaries in Lincoln, West Lindsey and North Kesteven shows no substantial decrease in salary. One potential cause could be a shift from full time working residents to part time working residents, whose annual salaries are likely to be lower as they work less hours. Additionally, if there has been a shift from full time working residents to self employed residents, data would not be included in the survey results, and therefore data could be missing on some potential higher earners. 22 ONS (2011) Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings Page 21 4.3 Our Safety Crime Over the last four years, there has been a consistent drop in the number of offences in Lincoln. From approximately 12,400 offences in Lincoln in 2007/08, to approximately 10,300 offences in 2010/11, accounting for a decrease of about 16.6%. Across Lincolnshire there has also been a decrease in the number of offences during this period of approximately 12.0%. Number of Offences in Lincoln 13,000 12,500 12,000 Number 11,500 11,000 10,500 10,000 9,500 9,000 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Year Source: Safer Communities Team, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) In Lincoln in 2010/11, the most common crime type was theft other (i.e. theft from a person, theft from a dwelling, and anything else that doesn’t fall within the other theft categories). This excluded offences such as theft of/from a vehicle and theft of a cycle. In total, theft other accounted for 26.9% of all crime in the city for that period. This offence was followed by violence against the person and criminal damage which accounted for 18.7% and 18.6% respectively 23 . 23 Safer Communities Team, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) CSP Crime Monthly Page 22 Serious acquisitive crime is a group of offences that includes such things as burglary, robbery and vehicle crime (e.g. theft from or of a vehicle). The number of serious acquisitive crimes in the city increased from approximately 1,370 in 2007/08, to about 1,500 in 2010/11, accounting for an increase of 9.5%, with a numerical increase of approximately 130 (figures rounded). However, it should be noted that early data for 2011/12 shows reductions in serious acquisitive crime, in particular burglary (dwelling). Number of Serious Acquisitive Crimes Number of Serious Acquisitive Crimes in Lincoln 1550 Number 1500 1450 1400 1350 1300 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Year Source: Safer Communities Team, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) In addition, from 2008/09 to 2010/11, the number of assaults leading to less serious injury (a proxy measure for alcohol-related offences) has remained relatively constant, with a small decrease of approximately 1% 24 . Number of Assaults Leading to Less Serious Injury in Lincoln 810 808 806 Number 804 802 800 798 796 794 792 790 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Year Source: Safer Communities Team, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) 24 Safer Communities Team, Lincolnshire County Council (2011) CSP Crime Monthly Page 23 Antisocial Behaviour In 2009, 432 requests were made to the City Council Antisocial Behaviour Team. In 2010, this reduced by 29.9% to 303 requests. In 2011, it increased by 35.3% to 410 requests. This shows the fluctuating nature of antisocial behaviour complaints. However, a note of caution should be made that these figures do not necessarily refer to incidents of antisocial behaviour, but could be the result of numerous requests made regarding the same issues. Additionally, reporting rates could be indicative of changes in public awareness of the Antisocial Behaviour Team 25 . Number of Requests Made to the City Council Antisocial Behaviour Team 500 450 432 410 400 Number 350 303 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2009 2010 2011 Year Source: Antisocial Behaviour Team, City of Lincoln Council (2012) 25 Antisocial Behaviour Team, City of Lincoln Council (2012) Requests Made to Antisocial Behaviour Team Page 24 4.4 Our Education Key Stage 1 In 2010/11 the KS1 attainment rate in Lincoln was 75.5% and in Lincolnshire was 79.6%, accounting for a difference of 4.1 percentage points. This was greater than the gap in 2008/09 when Lincolnshire’s attainment was 3 percentage points above that of the city’s 26 . Proportion of KS1 Pupils Achieving at least Level 2 in all four subjects 82% 80% Proportion 78% 76% Lincoln Lincolnshire 74% 72% 70% 68% 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Academic Year Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) Attainment in Lincoln varied between areas, with lowest attainment in Moorland, followed by Abbey then Glebe. In contrast, attainment was highest in Boultham, followed by Bracebridge and Carholme. Proportion of KS1 Pupils Achieving at least Level 2 in all four subjects in 2010/11 100.0% 87.3% 90.0% 80.0% Proportion 70.0% 84.6% 84.6% 73.6% 80.4% 77.2% 76.3% 69.4% 67.7% 65.9% 72.8% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% Ward Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) 26 KS1 Attainment Results (2011) cited by LRO (2011) Page 25 Pa rk oo r la nd M in st er M G le be Ha rts ho lm e Ca st le ge Ca rh ol m e Br ac eb rid Bo ul th am rc hw oo d Bi Ab be y 0.0% Key Stage 2 Data is unavailable for 2009/10. Nevertheless, in 2010/11 Lincoln had an attainment rate of 69%, compared to 75% across Lincolnshire, accounting for a gap of 6 percentage points, compared to only a 4.8 percentage point gap in 2008/09 27 . Proportion of KS2 Pupils Achieving Level 4 in English and Maths 76% Proportion 74% 72% Lincoln 70% Lincolnshire 68% 66% 64% 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Academic Year Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) Reflecting KS1 results, attainment was lowest in Moorland then Abbey. In addition to these areas, Birchwood also appeared as an area of low attainment. Hartsholme had the highest attainment rate in the city, and Bracebridge and Boultham once again had high attainment rates. Proportion of KS2 Pupils Achieving at least Level 4 in English and Maths 90.0% 77.1% 80.0% Proportion 50.0% 76.8% 83.1% 65.4% 65.5% 70.0% 60.0% 81.8% 66.1% 61.5% 57.3% 50.9% 45.7% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% Ward Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) 27 KS2 Attainment Results (2011) cited by LRO (2011) Page 26 Pa rk oo r la nd M in st er M G le be Ha rts ho lm e Ca st le rc hw oo d Bo ul th am Br ac eb r id ge Ca rh ol m e Bi Ab be y 0.0% Key Stage 4 Despite Lincoln’s attainment of 53.6% remaining below the County rate of 59.7%, the gap appears to be reducing, with a 6.1 percentage point gap in 2010/11, compared to a 12 percentage point gap in 2008/09 28 . Proportion of KS4 Pupils Achieving 5+ GCSEs A*-C including English and Maths 70% 60% Proportion 50% 40% Lincoln Lincolnshire 30% 20% 10% 0% 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Academic Year Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) Attainment is once again lowest in Moorland. Minster and then Park also feature as areas of low attainment. Carholme has the highest attainment in the city, followed by Boultham and then Bracebridge. Proportion of KS4 Pupils Achieving 5+ GCSEs A*-C including English and Maths 80.0% 72.9% 70.0% 55.3% Proportion 60.0% 50.0% 61.6% 61.1% 60.4% 49.3% 50.0% 47.8% 44.7% 43.9% 45.5% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% Ward Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) 28 KS4 Attainment Results (2011) cited by LRO (2011) Page 27 Pa rk oo r la nd M in st er M G le be Ha rts ho lm e Ca st le rc hw oo d Bo ul th am Br ac eb rid ge Ca rh ol m e Bi Ab be y 0.0% University Students The University of Lincoln has helped the city develop as an area of good quality higher education. In 2011/12 there were 10,367 undergraduate students studying at the University of Lincoln (full time and part time). Of these, the vast majority (9,933) studied at the Lincoln Brayford Pool campus in the city centre, or the Lincoln Riseholme Park campus just north of the city boundary. In addition, there were a further 1,355 postgraduate students (full time and part time) studying at the University, of which 1,212 were studying at the Lincoln Brayford Pool or Lincoln Riseholme Park campuses 29 . The University makes a significant contribution to the city: • The proportion of full time undergraduate students that graduated in 2009/10, and went on to employment or further study, was 92.6% 30 . • In the 2010/11 academic year, 1,088 students studying at the Lincoln Brayford Pool campus or the Lincoln Riseholme Park campus came from Lincoln and close by*. • Of the students that graduated in 2009/10, more than 300 found employment in Lincoln or close by* 31 . • In addition, the University is a significant employer in the city, providing employment to 1,331 academic and support staff 32 . *Students from Lincoln and areas close by have, for this purpose, been defined as students registered in postcode sectors that cross the Lincoln boundary. This area is highlighted as yellow on the map to the left. The Lincoln administrative boundary is shown by the black line. Source: ONS (2012) cited by GIS Planning Policy, City of Lincoln Council (2012) 29 University of Lincoln (2011) Key Facts About the University of Lincoln HEFCE Performance Indicator – Percentage 2009/10 Leavers cited by University of Lincoln (2011) Student Data 31 University of Lincoln (2011) Student Data 32 University of Lincoln (2011) Key Facts About the University of Lincoln 30 Page 28 Adult Qualifications Historically Lincoln has had low adult qualifications in comparison to the region and country. In 2010 however we can see a different picture. At NVQ levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 and above, qualifications for working age adults in Lincoln were estimated to be higher than the region, and for NVQ levels 1, 2 and 3 and above, were estimated to be higher than the national rates 33 . Proportion of Working Age Adults Education to NVQ 2 and Above Proportion of Working Age Adults Education to NVQ 1 and Above 84.00% 80% 82.00% 70% 60% Lincoln 78.00% East Midlands 76.00% Britain Proportion Proportion 80.00% 50% Lincoln 40% East Midlands 30% Britain 74.00% 20% 72.00% 10% 0% 70.00% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2010 2005 2006 Proportion of Working Age Adults Education to NVQ 3 and Above 2008 2009 2010 Proportion of Working Age Adults Education to NVQ 4 and Above 60.00% 35.00% 50.00% 30.00% 25.00% 40.00% Lincoln 30.00% East Midlands Britain 20.00% Proportion Proportion 2007 Year Year Lincoln 20.00% East Midlands 15.00% Britain 10.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2010 Source: ONS (2011) 33 2005 2006 2007 Year Year ONS (2011) Annual Population Survey: Qualifications Page 29 2008 2009 2010 4.5 Our Health Female Life Expectancy In 2004/06 female life expectancy in Lincoln from birth was 80.0 years, 1.5 years below the England and Wales average. In 2007/09 female life expectancy within the city increased to 81.1 years, 1.1 years behind the England and Wales average, showing that, although Lincoln still lags behind the national average, the gap in female life expectancy is decreasing. Female Life Expectancy 82.5 82 81.5 Years 81 Lincoln 80.5 East Midlands England and Wales 80 79.5 79 78.5 2004-06 2005-07 2006-08 2007-09 Period Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) Male Life Expectancy In 2004/06 male life expectancy in the city was 76.3 years from birth, 0.9 years below the England and Wales average. Despite increasing to 77.0 years in 2007/09, the gap between Lincoln and the rest of the country widened to 1.1 years 34 . Male Life Expectancy 78.5 78 77.5 Lincoln 77 East Midlands 76.5 England and Wales 76 75.5 75 2004- 06 2005- 07 2006- 08 2007- 09 P e r i od Source: Lincolnshire Research Observatory (2011) 34 LRO (2011) Life Expectancy datasets Page 30 Ward Level Life Expectancy When we look at life expectancy at ward level we can see it varies substantially. The gap between the highest female life expectancy (83.4 years in Minster) and the lowest (76.1 years in Park) is 7.3 years. For males, the gap between the highest (79.2 years in Bracebridge) and the lowest (73.4 years in Park) is 5.8 years. The difference between males and females is greatest in Abbey and Minster, where females are, on average, estimated to live approximately 6 years longer than males. In contrast, females in Birchwood and Park are estimated to live, on average, approximately 2 ½ years longer than males 35 . Life Expectancy in Lincoln in 2005-09 86.0 84.0 82.0 Years 80.0 78.0 Female Life Expectancy 76.0 Male Life Expectancy 74.0 72.0 70.0 Bi Ab be y rc hw o Bo o d ul th Br am ac eb r id Ca ge rh ol m e Ca st le G Ha leb e rts ho lm e M in st er M oo r la nd Pa rk 68.0 Ward Source: East Midlands Public Health Observatory (2011) NB. Ward life expectancy is for 2005/09, whereas district and above is for 2007/09. These datasets are therefore not directly comparable. 35 East Midlands Health Observatory (2011) Ward Life Expectancy Page 31 Additional Health Indicators Early Deaths: Heart Disease and Stroke Per 100,000 People under 75 Rate Per 100,000 Population 120 102.1 100 89.6 79.1 80 74.8 82.5 70.5 Lincoln 60 England 40 Lincoln’s premature mortality rate for heart disease and stroke remains above the national rate. Despite this, the gap has decreased from 29.1% above the national rate in 2005/07, to 17% above in 2007/09. 20 0 2005/07 2006/08 2007/09 Year Early Deaths: Cancer Per 100,000 People under 75 Premature mortality for cancer in Lincoln has been consistently higher than the national average; however, this gap is also reducing, from 16.8% above the national average in 2005/07, to 15.1% above in 2007/09. Rate Per 100,000 Population 160 140 120 134.9 129 135 115.5 112.1 114 100 Lincoln 80 England 60 40 20 0 2005/07 2006/08 2007/09 Year Hospital Stays for Alcohol Related Harm per 100,000 People Per 100,000 Population 2500 2000 1500 Lincoln England average 1000 500 0 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 The rate of hospital stays for alcohol related harm in Lincoln also remained consistently above the national rate; nevertheless, the trend is showing a declining gap, with Lincoln’s rate 14% above the national rate in 2007/08, and 12.3% above in 2009/10. Year Self-Harm per 100,000 People 2009/10 36 37 36 37 600 500 Per 100,000 Population The rate of hospital stays for self-harm per 100,000 people in Lincoln is over double that of the England average rate, and only 8.5% below the worst rate in England. This includes repeat hospital stays. Data suggests the location of a Prison in Lincoln may have a small impact upon the statistics; additionally Lincoln’s young population may also impact on Lincoln’s relatively high rate. 497.5 455.1 400 300 198.3 200 100 48 0 Lincoln England average England worst Area Source: Data in all 4 graphs are from NHS Health Profiles (2011) Department of Health (2011) 2011 NHS Health Profile for Lincoln East Midlands Public Health Observatory (2011) Self-Harm contextual data Page 32 England best Physical activity The annual TNS School Sport Survey, conducted on behalf of the Department for Education (formerly the Department for Children, Schools and Families), provides us with an indication of the provision of PE and school sport in state schools. The results show us that Lincoln’s performance has improved over the last 2 consecutive years, and performance remains above the national average 38 . Proportion of Year 1-13 Pupils Spending 3+ Hours per Week on High Quality PE and School Sport 60.0% 57.8% 58.0% 56.0% 55.1% Proportion 56.0% 54.0% 2008-09 52.0% 2009-10 49.6% 50.0% 48.0% 46.0% 44.0% Lincoln England average Area Source: NHS Health Profiles (2011) Sport England conduct telephone surveys each year to record from a sample of the population how many people are participating in recommended levels of physical activity, equivalent to 30 minutes exercise on 5 or more days per week. For this indicator, the proportion of adults engaged in this type of exercise appears to have reduced, although this still remains above the national average (by a marginal amount). It is noted in a caveat to this indicator that the results have not been weighted by age, and it is likely a greater proportion of younger people undertake levels of physical activity at the recommended levels than older people. If this is the case, and a lower proportion of younger people responded to the survey than would be representative of Lincoln’s relatively young population, then the results may not be entirely reflective of the city’s actual rate of adult physical activity. Estimated Proportion of Adult Population Participating in Recommended Levels of Physical Activity 11.9% 11.8% 11.8% 11.7% 11.6% Proportion 11.6% 11.5% 11.5% 2008-09 11.4% 2009-10 11.3% 11.2% 11.2% 11.1% 11.0% 10.9% Lincoln England average Area Source: NHS Health Profiles (2011) 38 Department of Health (2010) 2010 NHS Health Profile for Lincoln; Department of Health (2011) 2011 NHS Health Profile for Lincoln Page 33 Mental Health Data on three key disability related benefit types gives us an indication as to the extent of mental health issues in the city: • • • Employment and Support Allowance o 1,160 claims in Lincoln, of which 470 are due to mental and behavioural disorders Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance o 3,400 claims in Lincoln, of which 1,640 are due to mental and behavioural disorders Disability Living Allowance o 5,430 claims in Lincoln, of which 960 are due to learning difficulties The breakdown of this information shows the reasons behind people claiming disability related benefits in Lincoln. It shows that the most common reason for claiming both Employment and Support Allowance (approximately 2/5th), and Incapacity Benefit / Severe Disablement Allowance (approximately 1/2nd), was for mental and behavioural disorders. In addition, the most common reason for claiming Disability Living Allowance in Lincoln was for people with learning difficulties 39 . Most Common Conditions for Incapacity Benefit / Severe Disablement Allowance in May 2011 in Lincoln Most Common Conditions for Employment and Support Allowance in May 2011 in Lincoln 60.0% 40.5% Proportion of Total Claimants Proportion of Total Claimants 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 14.7% 15.0% 14.7% 9.5% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Mental and behavioural disorders Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue Symptoms, signs Injury, poisoning and and abnormal clinical certain other and laboratory consequences of findings, not external causes elsewhere classified 48.2% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% Proportion of Total Claimants 17.7% 15.3% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 8.3% 10.0% 8.0% 5.7% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Learning Difficulties Arthritis Psychosis Disease of the Muscles, Bones or Joints Conditions Source: ONS (2011) DWP Benefits Data 39 Mental and behavioural disorders Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsew here classified Condition Most Common Conditions for Disability Living Allowance in May 2011 in Lincoln 18.0% 12.4% 7.4% 0.0% Condition 20.0% 14.7% 10.0% ONS (2011) DWP Benefits Data Page 34 Diseases of the nervous system 5. Our Carbon Footprint, Environment and Heritage 5.1 Emissions across Lincoln Comparatively, Lincoln has low estimated carbon emissions per capita as the chart below shows. Lincoln has 5.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per capita, compared to Lincolnshire which has 6.8 and the East Midlands which has 7.7. Total CO² emissions in Lincoln have reduced by 17.4% since 2005. This is higher than countywide reductions of 11.7%, and regional reductions of 14.8% over the same period. Tonnes of C02 Emissions Per Capita 10.0 9.3 9.2 8.9 9.0 7.9 Tonnes Per Capita 8.0 7.0 7.9 8.6 7.6 7.4 7.7 6.8 6.2 6.3 6.1 6.0 5.9 Lincoln 5.2 5.0 Lincolnshire 4.0 East Midlands 3.0 2.0 1.0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Year Source: Department of Energy and Climate Change (2011) The graph below show’s industry and commercial, as well as domestic CO² usage is proportionately more prominent in Lincoln than countywide and regionally. Alternatively, road transport accounts for more CO² emissions across Lincolnshire and the East Midlands as a proportion of their totals. This is most likely due to the nature of the roads and estimated vehicle types travelling on them. For example, there are no motorways in Lincoln which could increase an area’s CO² estimates 40 . Percentage Breakdown of Reasons for C0² Emissions in 2009 (Each Area = 100% ) 60.0% Proportion 50.0% 40.0% Industry and Commercial Domestic 30.0% Road Transport LULUCF 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Lincoln Lincolnshire East Midlands Area Source: Department of Energy and Climate Change (2011) *LULUCF = Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. 40 DECC (2011) Summary Local CO2 emission estimates Page 35 5.2 City Council Emissions In 2008/09 the City Council CO² equivalent emissions estimate was 2,502 tonnes. In 2010/11 this had reduced by 17.6% to 2,062 tonnes. This reduction is as a result of projects carried out across the City Council, which have contributed to reducing our energy usage. The figures include not only services provided directly by the City Council, but also services that have been contracted out to external providers, such as Cory and Active Nation. Total Tonnes of CO² Equivalent Emissions of the City Council 3000 Tonnes of CO²e 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Year Source: City of Lincoln Council (2011) As part of the City Council’s commitment to the environment, electricity used by the City Council comes from a Green Tariff (this does not necessarily include electricity used by contractors). In 2008/09 renewable energy from a Green Tariff accounted for 50.2% of total City Council CO² equivalent emissions. In 2010/11 this had increased to 52.2% of total emissions 41 . 41 Environmental Sustainability, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report Page 36 5.3 Brownfield Land The maps below show National Land Use Database mapped sites in Lincoln that are identified as brownfield land. The area of brownfield land reported for the whole of Lincoln in 2002 was 154.2 hectares, and in 2011 was 77.2 hectares. Whilst some of this may be attributable to changes in the definition of what is included as “brownfield land” over this time, the figures are still indicative of an overall reducing trend, due to development of brownfield land in the city 42 . Brownfield Sites in 2002 Brownfield Sites in 2011 Source: Planning Policy, City of Lincoln Council (2012) 42 Planning Policy, City of Lincoln Council (2012) Brownfield Sites Page 37 5.4 Natural Environment Lincoln covers 3,569 hectares (36 square kilometres), amounting to only 0.6% of the total county land coverage 43 . Local wildlife sites make up 592 hectares of the city, contributing to 16.6% of total land coverage, with 47 sites in total. There are 112 hectares of site of special scientific interest in the city, and 7 hectares of regionally important geological sites. Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust Nature Reserves also make up 32 hectares of the city. Of the eligible open space in Lincoln, about 53 hectares is managed to Green Flag Award standard 44 . There are 92 hectares of public and private parks and gardens (15 areas). This includes the complete extents of The Lawn and Castle grounds 45 . 5.5 Heritage The Academy of Urbanism awarded Steep Hill in Lincoln the Great Street 2012 award 46 . Towards the end of the first century AD, Lincoln became one of a handful of coloniae in England, including Colchester and Gloucester. Colonia was the highest status a Roman settlement could attain 47 . Lincoln is now recognised internationally for its important archaeology from the Roman Period 48 . There are 418 Listed Buildings in the city ranging from the Roman Period through to the 1950s, and 12 buildings on the City Council’s Local Buildings at Risk Register 49 . 43 LRO (2011) 2010 Mid Year Estimates Population – Quick reference sheet City of Lincoln Council (2010) State of the City Report 2010 45 City of Lincoln Council (2006) Open Space Audit Report 46 The Academy of Urbanism (2012) Awards 47 City of Lincoln Council (2011) Heritage Connect 48 Central Lincolnshire Joint Strategic Planning Committee (2010) Central Lincolnshire Cores Strategy: Issues and Options 2010 49 Culture and Heritage, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Culture and Heritage data 44 Page 38 6. Our City’s Housing and the City Council’s Landlord Function 6.1 House Prices and Affordability House prices have risen significantly since 1996, although house prices in Lincoln have remained consistently below the national, regional and countywide averages. From 1996 to 2007, house prices in Lincoln consistently rose year on year to a high of £124,950. However, in 2008 house prices fell in Lincoln, mirroring a fall in prices across the county, region and country. In 2010, house prices once again picked up in England, the East Midlands and Lincolnshire. In contrast, the average house price in Lincoln continued to fall. To put this in context, in 2010, the average house price in the East Midlands was £139,500, 3.3% higher than 2009 prices, but still 3.8% lower than 2007 house prices (prior to the slump). In contrast, the average Lincoln house price in 2010 was £117,000, 1.7% below 2009 prices, and 6.4% below 2007 prices 50 . Median House Price Land Registry Data 1996-2010 £200,000 £180,000 Median House Price £160,000 £140,000 England £120,000 East Midlands £100,000 Lincolnshire £80,000 Lincoln £60,000 £40,000 £20,000 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 £0 Year Source: Department for Communities and Local Government (2011) 50 DCLG (2011) Table 586 Housing market: median house prices based on Land Registry data, by district, from 1996 Page 39 Housing Affordability One of the consequences of a drop in house prices, and average earnings that do not follow the same trend is that houses are shown to be, on average, more affordable. The house price to earnings ratio has shown house prices becoming more affordable year on year in Lincoln since 2007, with an average house price to earnings ratio of 4.6 in 2010, making house prices more affordable in regard to average earnings than in Lincolnshire (6.1), the East Midlands (5.6) and England (7.0) 51 . Official house price data for Lincoln in 2011 has not yet been released. However, as already noted in the income section of this report, ONS data suggests income levels in the city may have seen a significant drop in 2011. If house prices have not also seen a similar fall in 2011, then housing affordability in the city may become an increasing issue. Ratio of Median House Price to Median Earnings (Low is More Affordable) House Price to Earnings Ratio 8.00 7.00 6.00 England 5.00 East Midlands 4.00 Lincolnshire 3.00 Lincoln 2.00 1.00 0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year Source: Department for Communities and Local Government (2011) 51 DCLG (2011) Table 577 Housing market: ratio of median house price to median earnings by district from 1997 Page 40 Mortgage and Landlord Possession Orders Following a peak in 2008, when there were 215 mortgage possession orders made in Lincoln, the number has steadily decreased by a total of 48.8% to 110* in 2011. The number of landlord possession orders also rose to 285 in 2008, although this did not reach previous highs of more than 300 from 2003 to 2005. Since 2008, the number of landlord possession orders has decreased by 31.6% to 195. Number of Mortgage and Landlord Possession Orders in Lincoln 400 350 300 Number 250 Mortgage Possession Orders 200 150 Landlord Possession Orders 100 50 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* Year Source: Ministry of Justice (2012) Despite a reducing trend, the chart below shows that the rate of mortgage and landlord possession orders in the city in 2011* were both above national, regional and countywide rates 52 . Number of Possession Orders in Lincoln per 1,000 Households in 2011* 6.0 5.1 Rate per 1,000 Households 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.0 3.6 England 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.5 East Midlands Lincolnshire Lincoln 2.0 1.0 0.0 Annual Landlord Possession Orders Annual Mortgage Possession Orders Possession Order Source: Ministry of Justice (2012) NB. The 2011 Quarter 4 figures are liable to revision to take account of any late amendments. This may have an impact on year total 2011 figures. 52 Ministry of Justice (2012) Statistics on mortgage and landlord possession actions in the county courts of England and Wales, 2000 to 2011 Quarter 4 Page 41 6.2 Affordable Homes Recently Built Affordable Homes From 2008/09 to 2010/11 325 affordable homes were built in Lincoln, with the vast majority being built in 2009/10 and 2010/11 53 . Number of Affordable Homes Built 350 300 Number 250 200 2010-11 150 2009-10 2008-09 100 50 0 1 Affordable Homes Source: City of Lincoln Council (2011) Stock of Affordable Homes Lincoln is home to an estimated 44,800 (rounded) residential addresses. Of these, more than 9,000 are classed as affordable homes. Of these affordable homes, the majority (approximately 7,900) are owned and rented by the Council. However, the important role Registered Social Landlords play in the supply of affordable housing in Lincoln should also be noted, with these landlords accounting for approximately 1,700 homes 54 . NB. All figures rounded to nearest hundred. The Split in Ownership of Affordable Homes 9000 8000 7000 Number 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Council Reigstered Social Landlord Owner Source: City of Lincoln Council (2011) 53 Housing Strategy, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Number of Affordable Homes Built in Lincoln 54 Housing Strategy, City of Lincoln Council (2011) September 2011 Affordable Homes data Page 42 6.3 Waiting List and Lettings Waiting List by Type An important part of the landlord function is ensuring a range of homes of different sizes are available to provide for the housing needs of a range of household types. This must be particularly taken into account when planning the provision of additional affordable housing in the city. Waiting List by Household Type (January 2012) 45% 42% 38% 40% 35% Proportion 30% 25% 20% 15% 11% 10% 6% 3% 5% 0% Adult groups Couples Families Single Single with access Household Type Source: City of Lincoln Council (2012) In total there were 3,030 households on the City Council housing waiting list in January 2012. The most common household type was families, followed by single households, accounting for 42% and 38% respectively 55 . 55 Housing Strategy, City of Lincoln Council (2012) Housing Market Report July 2011 Page 43 Number of Lettings by Property Type In quarter 3 of 2011/12 there were 256 lettings. The majority of these (57%) were flats, followed by houses (33%). This is not just reflective of demand, but also of turnover 56 . Lettings by Property Type (Quarter 3 2011/12) 60% 57% 50% Proportion 40% 33% 30% 20% 6% 10% 4% 0% House Bungalow Flat Maisonette Property Type Source: City of Lincoln Council (2012) Average Weekly Rents Average Weekly Rents £70.00 £67.58 Average Weekly Rent £68.00 £66.00 £64.00 £62.00 £60.00 £59.43 £58.00 £56.00 £54.00 Local Authority (2011/12*) Registered Social Landlord (2011) Organisation Type (Year) Source: Department for Communities and Local Government (2011) The average weekly rent for a Local Authority property in Lincoln is £59.43* 57 , compared to £67.58 for a property rented from a Registered Social Landlord 58 . NB. 2011/12 Local Authority figure is provisional and may be subject to revision. 56 Housing Strategy, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Housing Market Report July 2011 DCLG (2011) Table 702 58 DCLG (2011) Table 704 57 Page 44 Council Tenants in receipt of Housing Benefit At the end of 2009/10 there were 7,858 council tenants, of whom over half were claiming full housing benefit. By the end of 2010/11 this proportion had increased slightly to 56.6% of 7,830 59 council tenants. In addition, the proportion of tenants claiming part housing benefit increased to 22.5%. These increases resulted in the proportion claiming no housing benefit decreasing to 20.9% 60 . Council Tenants by Housing Benefit Claims 60.0% 52.5% 56.6% 50.0% Proportion 40.0% 36.1% 2009/10 30.0% 22.5% 2010/11 20.9% 20.0% 11.4% 10.0% 0.0% Full Housing Benefit Part Housing Benefit No Housing Benefit Housing Benefit Source: City of Lincoln Council (2011) 59 Housing Systems, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Total number of Council Tenants Housing Benefits, City of Lincoln Council (2011) Number of Council Tenants in receipt of Housing Benefit 60 Page 45 7. Conclusion Lincoln is a city of 89,700 and growing. Unlike the rest of the county, it is characterised by a young population, partly as a result of large educational institutions such as the University of Lincoln. Migrant workers have also impacted upon the demographic makeup of the city, with over one thousand National Insurance registrations by overseas nationals in 2010/11. Many of those registrations came from people from European Union Accession States. The 2010 Indices of Multiple Deprivation provides us with an indication of how relative deprivation is distributed across the city. The Indices highlight areas within Abbey, Birchwood, Castle, Glebe and Moorland wards. Many of these areas have particularly high levels of young residents aged under 16. Like many parts of the country, Lincoln is facing some specific issues in regard to the economy. There is a higher than average rate of child poverty in Lincoln, with particularly high rates in Glebe, Moorland and Birchwood wards – areas of which were highlighted as relatively deprived in the 2010 Indices of Multiple Deprivation. The proportion of 16-18 year olds not in education, employment or training has remained consistently higher than the countywide rate, with Park ward in particular showing high levels of young 16-18 year olds out of employment, education or training. Unemployment more generally is an issue affecting many in Lincoln, which has seen a continued higher unemployment claimant rate than experienced across the East Midlands or England as a whole. The unemployment claimant rate is highest in the east of the city, particularly in Abbey, as well as areas such as Park, Castle, Glebe and Moorland. In addition to unemployment, there are indications that those in work may have seen a drop in average pay across the city, however, a note of caution should be made regarding the small sample size of the survey this data comes from. Crime in the city has decreased, showing a healthy trend over the last few years. When we look at crime type, we can see that serious acquisitive crime (e.g. crime that results in material gain) increased in 2010/11, although early 2011/12 data shows reductions, particularly in regard to burglary (dwelling). The City Council’s Antisocial Behaviour Team has received a fluctuating number of requests over the last 3 years. However, the number of requests made to the team is not always indicative of the amount of antisocial behaviour, as several requests regarding the same incident could be made. Additionally, changes in the number of requests made could be impacted by public awareness of the Antisocial Behaviour Team. Educational attainment has increased in Lincoln at all three key stages. Nevertheless, the gap between Lincoln and Lincolnshire has increased at both Key Stages 1 and 2. Lowest attainment can be seen in areas of the south of the city, particularly Moorland ward which has comparatively low attainment at all three key stages. In addition, evidence also exists of low attainment in the north east of the city, particularly in Abbey ward which features as an area of comparatively low attainment at both Key Stages 1 and Page 46 2. The University continues to have a positive impact on the city, with many graduates gaining employment in Lincoln and the areas close by. In addition, estimated adult attainment for 2010 shows higher rates of working age people educated to NVQ levels 1, 2, 3 and 4+ than the region. Although life expectancy in the city remains below the regional and national averages for both males and females, life expectancy for Lincoln residents is increasing. The gap between female life expectancy in Lincoln and England and Wales has shown signs of decreasing in recent years; however the gap in male life expectancy has increased. Female life expectancy is highest in Minster and lowest in Park, whereas for males it is highest in Bracebridge and lowest in Park. Although the gaps between Lincoln and England for premature mortality rates due to heart disease and stroke, as well as cancer are reducing, these remain above the national rates. Benefits data shows us a common reason for people claiming disability related benefits in Lincoln is due to mental health and behavioural disorders as well as learning difficulties, showing a prominence of mental health issues in Lincoln. The small size of Lincoln means it is perhaps likely to have less carbon emissions than other larger areas of the county, and comparatively low CO² estimates are certainly reflected in the 2009 data. Contributing to this is the proportionately low emissions we have due to road transport. This is perhaps not surprising considering Lincoln’s road network covers approximately 280 kilometres, compared to the county road network which covers a much larger 9,000 kilometres. Over the last three years, the City Council has seen a year on year reduction in CO² equivalent emissions, and in 2010/11 renewable energy from a Green Tariff accounted for more than half of total emissions. Being a compact city of only 36 square kilometres, making use of all available land in Lincoln is an important part of helping Lincoln develop in a sustainable way. In 2002 there was more than 150 hectares of brownfield land in Lincoln. However, largely thanks to development (although there have been some changes to the definition of what is included as brownfield land), the amount of brownfield land in the city has reduced by approximately half. Despite the increase in house prices seen across the county, region and country in 2010, house prices in Lincoln continued to fall. This helped Lincoln maintain its favourable affordability ratio, which shows average houses in Lincoln to be consistently more affordable in comparison to average resident earnings. However, with latest pay data suggesting a fall in peoples’ incomes, affordability may become an increasing issue in the future. Information on the Council’s waiting list also shows there remains substantial demand for affordable housing of various types. On a positive note, despite the rate of mortgage and landlord possession orders remaining higher in Lincoln than the countywide, regional and national rates, the number of orders made in the city has seen a reduction in recent years. Page 47 Page 48
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz