The Marine Socio-Economics Project (MSEP) is a project funded by The Tubney Charitable Trust and coordinated by NEF (the new economics foundation) in partnership with the WWF, the MCS, the RSPB, and The Wildlife Trusts. The project aims to build socio-economic capacity and cooperation between NGOs and aid their engagement with all sectors using the marine environment. Recreational Sea Angling (RSA) via nv2 o r y b Photo: r ck Fli Sea Angling 20121 is the widest study to ever have been undertaken on sea angling in England. It set out to find out how many people go sea angling in England, how much they catch, how much they release, and the economic and social value of sea angling.2 The report, Sea Angling 2012, was commissioned by Defra and the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) to aid decision-making over sustainable development policies with regard to all forms of sea fishing. The surveys, conducted as part of the study, also helped meet UK obligations under European law to estimate recreational catches of several species, including bass and cod. 12 The study reviewed existing evidence and collected data from over 11,000 sea anglers through surveys. The main findings: P P P There are 884,000 sea anglers in England; this compares to around 76,000 in Wales and 125 000 in Scotland. They spend a total of almost four million days fishing every year (UK wide). A Scottish government report from 2009 estimated 1.6 million days spent angling (17 per individual). P This supported 10 400 full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs and almost £360 million of gross value added (GVA). P Considering indirect and induced effects, sea angling supported £2.1 billion of total spending, provided a total of over 23,600 jobs, and added almost £980 million of GVA to the UK economy. P Estimates from Defra research at specific case study sites suggested between 1000 and 4,000 angling trips can generate one Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) per job per year in that site. P Mackerel (27%) and whiting (19%) are the most common species caught by number, followed by bass (10%), dogfish/catshark (6%), and dab/cod (5% each). P The UKNEAFO3 (second phase) established that the highest visit numbers were in Southeast England, with the Southwest taking second place. Mean site visits for England and Wales were on average 5–6 times higher than for Scottish sites. P Anglers’ recreational activities make significant contributions to local economies, These anglers make a significant contribution to the economy. In 2012, sea anglers resident in England spent £1.23 billion on their recreational pursuit, equivalent to £831 million 1http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/seaangling/finalreport.htm 2 Data were collected through the Office of National Statistics (ONS) household surveys [‘Opinions and lifestyles survey’], face- to-face interviews with anglers by inshore fisheries and conservation authorities (IFCAs), catch diaries, and online surveys (almost 3000 online survey responses in 2012). 1 direct spend once imports and taxes had been excluded. 3http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ MSEP Facts & Figures Series 4: Recreational Sea Anging (RSA) and also gain considerable non-market value from marine ecosystems.4 Recreational boat fishing in England There are 339 charter boats registered in England. 600 P On average 60% of the catches are returned on the charter boats surveyed. P Cod (175 tonnes) and pollack (129 tonnes) were the most common species landed by charter vessels. 400 Flounder and dab feature very highly in shore results. P Smoothound and Thornback ray (and other ray generally) feature highly in both shore and boat lists in all regions. P Other species important to anglers not specifically named in the survey but added by respondents include mackerel, tope, whiting, blond ray, and all other members of the ray family.6 DAB FLOUNDER BLACK BREAM CORGER 400 1000 WRASSE POLLACK SOLE PLAICE MULLET FLOUNDER COD SMOOTHOUND 300 0 P SMOOTHOUND POLLACK COD UK Shore (Excl. Ireland) 100 UK Overall (Excl. Ireland) 800 600 5 Sea Angling 2012 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. uk/20140108121958/http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/seaangling/index.htm SOLE WRASSE BLACK BREAM MULLET SMOOTHOUND POLLACK FLOUNDER 0 COD 200 THOMBACK RAY 400 4Beaumont et al. 2008; Stolk 2009; Scottish Government 2009 2 500 200 While most species make both shore and boat lists, mullet are primarily a shore target. (High priority for shore anglers but not in the top 10 boat species.) 6 NFSA, 2005 0 THROMBACK RAY There are large differences between English regions, with the top species in one region being non-existent or unimportant in others. BASS 100 Shore fishing was the most common type of sea angling – almost three million angler-days were spent fishing along the English shore, compared with one million for private or rented boats and 0.1 million on charter boats. Anglers had most success on charter boats, catching 10 fish per day on average compared with around five from private boats and only two from the shore. Shore and boat anglers have clearly different priorities in terms of target species.5 P 200 PLAICE Private and rental boat activity was estimated at 0.5–1 million days of effort per year. THROMBACK RAY 300 Shore fishing in England P 500 BASS P UK Boats (Excl. Ireland) BASS P Figure 1: The ‘National Fish Survey’, carried out by the NFSA Conservation Group in 2005 came up with the following results for the main species caught from: The Y-axis represents the ranking awarded by the survey participant in terms of importance. MSEP Facts & Figures Series 4: Recreational Sea Anging (RSA) Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and cod (Gadus morhua) angling data Sea angling and well-being P P P P P P Sea angling also has important social and well-being benefits, including providing relaxation, physical exercise, and a route for socialising. The main social benefits listed by interviewees were that it increased their quality of life, helping them ‘experience nature’, ‘being outdoors and active’, and to ‘relax and get away from things’.7 Anglers felt that improving fish stocks was the most important factor that would increase participation in sea angling. Anglers felt the number and size of fish had declined over the past five years and even more so over the past 20–30 years; the economic and well-being impacts are therefore correspondingly less than they could be if stocks recovered. For anglers, the place identity indicators scored higher on average when it came to how they viewed the sites they fished. Through a combination of primary valuation and benefits transfer, monetary and nonmonetary valuation, the UKNEA survey8 aimed to assess the cultural ecosystem service benefits surrounding angling, which include recreational, aesthetic, spiritual, educational, health, identity, social bonding, sense of place, and existence values for marine biodiversity. The survey also aimed to provide useful data for the Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ) Impact Assessment and evaluation of potential Scottish Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), and for future marine Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Impact Assessments. Non-monetary results show that recreational users of the marine environment readily relate to a range of less tangible wellbeing benefits that can be measured and used to operationalise cultural ecosystem services and include them in discussions over marine protection.9 P The UK has obligations under European law to estimate the recreational catches of several species, including bass and cod. P The total bass caught was estimated at 380–690 tonnes, of which 240–440 tonnes were kept. P Commercial catches of bass in England were estimated at 897 tonnes in 2012. P Catch-and-release rates between 40% and 80% from boats and shore anglers were recorded. P The total cod caught was estimated at 480– 870 tonnes, of which 430–820 tonnes were kept. Comparatively, around 1500 tonnes of cod were landed commercially in the North Sea, English Channel, Celtic Sea, and Irish Sea combined. P Catch-and-release rates between 20% and 60% for charter boats and shore anglers were recorded. P Catch was estimated by multiplying CPUE (catch per unit effort; in this case catch per day angling) by angling effort (the number of days spent fishing per year). P Overall, bass is clearly the most important species for RSA, leading UK and England shore, boat, and combined results. Only one English region (North East) has a different top species. P Bass is a premier angling species throughout Europe, and is currently not a quota species under the Common Fisheries Policy Total Allowable Catches (CFP TACs). This causes difficulties in terms of scientific data collection, exact landings data, and the ability to regulate and enforce catch limits/quotas.10 P Bass is not subject to any species-specific management plan, nor are there any annual quotas in place in EU fisheries. There are limited species-specific gear restrictions 7 http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/seaangling/finalreport.htm 8http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ 9 UKNEAFO, 2012 http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ 3 10 To find out more about the EU CFP and bass http://www.ccr-s.eu/transfert-pdf/2012/34/CE-Control01.pdf MSEP Facts & Figures Series 4: Recreational Sea Anging (RSA) (particularly on mesh size), but in general the species is managed only as part of the broader EU fisheries system.11 P The Bass Anglers’ Sportfishing Society (BASS) claimed that recreational fishing of the species was worth £100 million in 2004. The European seabass is both an important commercial fish species and one of the most important fish species for recreational fishermen in the UK. The species is thought to be particularly vulnerable to over-fishing. The available evidence suggests that there has been a population decline in recent years. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) recommended that bass catches be reduced by 20% in 2013 to protect the stock.12 As a result of concerns over bass stocks and the commercial landings causing a significant decline, BASS13,14 was formed in 1973. It has campaigned since then to ensure that the value of recreational bass fishing is understood and that the depletion caused by commercial pair-trawling is halted (as the UK economy is losing value through this commercial fishery, which is clearly an unsustainable use of such a charismatic and iconic species, both socially and environmentally). ICES advises that commercial landings should be no more than 1,155 tonnes in ICES areas IV and VII) for 2015.15 Discards are known to take place but the data are insufficient to estimate a discard proportion that could be applied to give catch advice.16 11http://www.iffo.net/files/iffoweb/approved-raw-materials/product/ uk-ireland-seabass-byproduct-surveillance-feb-13.pdf A minimum landing size (MLS) of 36 cm was introduced in 1990 to protect the stock, along with a range of other measures. Sport fishing bodies, whose members highly value the challenge offered by larger fish, have campaigned to increase the MLS for bass. Adult female seabass do not breed until they are at least 40–45 cm, hence increasing the MLS to 45 cm would help to ensure that more females can breed before they are caught. Such a change would have economic implications for some commercial fishermen and therefore it has not happened. The Angling Trust The Angling Trust was formed in 2009 from a merger of five separate angling organisations who came together to form a single representative body for all forms of recreational angling (very broadly categorised as coarse, game, and sea angling). The Angling Trust is the government-recognised national representative body of angling in England (Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have their own bodies) and receives funding, like other national sport governing bodies, from Sport England. Staff members working on angling development and participation are largely funded by money from Sport England. Fish Legal is the legal arm of the Angling Trust, which fights pollution, makes polluters pay, and carries out a host of other legal activities for its members who, unlike the Angling Trust, cover the whole of the UK.17 Membership totals approximately 15,000 individual members (2013) across all disciplines. Those who fish at sea (either exclusively or as well as in freshwater) account for approximately 25% of the Trust’s total individual membership. P Approximately 1,600 member clubs exist, of which 240 are sea angling clubs, societies, or organisations. P The combined membership of all member organisations is approximately 350,000. 12http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN00745.pdf 13http://www.ukbass.com/ 14 To find out more about BASS and the value of recreational bass angling and their concerns over bass stocks and habitat damage, and quotas, see: http://www.ukbass.com/ http://www.ukbass.com/ tag/quotas/ 15http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2014/2014/bss-47.pdf 16http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2013/2013/bss-47.pdf 4 17 More info on the Trust and Fish Legal can be found here: http://www.anglingtrust.net/page.asp?section=30§ionTitle=About+the+Angling+Trust MSEP Facts & Figures Series 4: Recreational Sea Anging (RSA) P Individual adult membership is £25 per year and clubs pay an annual fee based on the number of members they have. P Clubs and organisations can also choose to be Fish Legal members, for which they pay an additional fee. Fish Legal can only act for its member clubs and organisations. P Recruiting new members has been, and continues to be, a huge challenge. Despite the financial climate, however, individual membership has grown. P A wide variety of benefits18 is offered to members of the national representative body. The Angling Trust is run by a board of directors and does not have charitable status – a strategic decision made to ensure it could campaign and lobby. There are now over 40 employees of the Angling Trust across the country. A Marine Group meets annually to discuss sea angling issues of strategic importance to the Angling Trust. The regions have been based around the IFCA regions as closely as possible in order to facilitate consistency.19 Black Bream – Kingmere MCZ: Kingmere Reef, the key UK black bream breeding site in the English Channel, has been put forward as a recommended MCZ. The Angling Trust’s Sussex Marine Region has launched a campaign20 to recognise the importance of one of Sussex’s most iconic sea fish species – the black bream. Despite the status as one of Sussex’s most highly prized and respected angling species, it remains unmanaged. Recently anglers have seen a decline in the quality and abundance of bream as unsustainable commercial fishing pressure from pair trawling and unmanaged charter boats has taken its toll on vulnerable breeding and nesting bream stocks. The Angling Trust’s Sussex Marine Region’s campaign aims to highlight the black bream as 18http://www.anglingtrust.net/page.asp?section=35§ionTitle=Angling+Trust+Member+Benefits 19http://www.anglingtrust.net/page.asp?section=833§ionTitle=Angling+Trust+Regions%3A+Get+Involved%21 20http://www.anglingtrust.net/news.asp?section=29&itemid=1913 5 one of Sussex’s most valuable natural assets as well as focusing on its socio-economic value to Sussex. Recreational angling must be fairly represented in decisions about the management of the Kingmere MCZ and the Angling Trust wishes to help identify other important black bream breeding sites in Sussex. By doing so collaboratively with Sussex IFCA, it hopes to help introduce a long-term species management plan for black bream in Sussex waters that benefits all stakeholders.21 Further reading: P A summary of sea angling in England. Retrieved from http:// www.anglingtrust.net/page. asp?section=40§ionTitle=Sea+Angling P Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Davies, A., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Ranger, S., Solandt, J.L., Duncan, C., Christie, M., Crump, H., Irvine, K.N., Pinard, M., Reed, M.S. (2013). The value of potential marine protected areas in the UK to divers and sea anglers. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org P The Economic Value of Marine and Coastal Recreation in West Wales: A Non-Technical Executive Summary. Retrieved from http:// www.walesactivitymapping.org.uk/economicvaluation/ P Value of the Impact of Marine Protected Areas on Recreation and Tourism Services – Case Study Draft Final Report, prepared for Defra, 5 June 2013. Briefings on Recreational Angling in the UK 1. Recreational Sea Angling (RSA) 2. Recreational Sea Angling (RSA): Minimum Landing Sizes (MLS) 3. Recreational Diving in the UK Series 4 was written and researched by Chris Williams (Marine Socio-Economics Project Coordinator at NEF). All the data examined in this series come from the UK Government, The MMO or Defra – unless otherwise referenced.These data sources can be found on the MSEP website: http://www.mseproject.net/data-sources 21 http://www.anglingtrustsussexmarine.net/#/blackbream/4569654667 Published by the New Economics Foundation (NEF), August 2014. www.neweconomics.org Tel: 020 7820 6300 Registered charity number 1055254.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz