Business Daily Date: 17.07.2014 Page 1,4 Article size: 277 cm2 ColumnCM: 61.55 AVE: 116955.55 Gvil society groups in court to block payment of Uhuru, Ruto suit costs BY BRIAN WASUNA Two civil society organisations have appealed a High Court or der compelling them to pay mil lions of shillings as costs of a suit in which they had challenged the eligibility of the President and his deputy to contest last year's Gen eral Election. The Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) and the In given the resources available to the applicants," he said. The contested judgment was de livered in February last year by a fivejudge Bench consisting of Mbo goli Msagha, Luka Kimaru, Pauline Nyamweya, Hellen Omondi and George Kanyi Kimondo. In their failed petition, the appli cants, including the International Centre for Conflict and Policy, Public Corruption and Ethics Governance, Charles Mwangi and Henry Nyan gaya were ordered to bear the costs of the petition. They were challenging the eligi Despite highlighting that the High bility of the president, his deputy mission (IEBC) has already hilled Court had no jurisdiction to determine and Mr Gesami to contest last year's the petition, the judges ruled that the election. They ci ted the criminal charges fac petition lacked merit as some of the prayers sought were speculative and ing Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto at the International Criminal Court, and Mr overtaken by events. In their court papers, KHRC and Gesami's alleged transfer of Shi mil ICJ claim that the High Court did lion from the Constituency Develop them Sh76,8 million was filed in not consider the fundamental issues public interest and should not at tract any award of costs. They have enjoined President Uhuru Kenyatta, Deputy President raised in the petition while determin ternationa! Commission of Jurists (ICJ) have moved to the Court of Appeal, arguing that then peti tion for which the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Com William Ruto, IEBC, the attorney general and West Mugirango MP James Gesami in the suit. "There was no private gain attributable to the applicants regardless of the outcome of the petition. The courts, including the Supreme Court, have numer ing the case. Public interest ment fund to his personal account. IEBC was also enjoined in the pe tition, with the applicants seeking to have the polls body reject the nomina tion of the three individuals in their They claim awarding costs against political bids. them would discourage people from Their nominations had, however, filing public interest matters. The two societies also claim that already been accepted by IEBC by the time of the judgment, hence the they had already filed a notice of ap court verdict that the petition had peal in regard to the said judgment been overtaken by events. and are awaiting the typed record of proceedings. "In that intended appeal, ICJ and ously stated that matters brought in public interest should general KHRC are challenging the decision ly not attract the SUIT,Page4» to award costs against them. It would »From Pagei award of costs," said be in the best interest of justice that ICJKenya executive the intended appeal be heard and de director George Kegoro. termined before costs, if any, are re He added that the petition was covered against the applicants," said filed to clarify the meaning of certain Mr Kegoro. provisions of the Constitution, espe Jurisdiction cially those dealing with leadership and integrity. "There was no finding that the petition filed was frivolous, an abuse Both parties believe that the intended appeal would raise issues relating to the High Court's execution of juris diction and the manner in which it of the court process or incompetent. handled the petition. It (judgment) was unfair and unjust Mr George Kegoro, the ICJKenya executive director, m t Ipsos Kenya Acorn House,97 James Gichuru Road Lavington Nairobi Kenya
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz