Reduction of Oriental Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Populations in Papaya Orchards by Field Sanitation l •2 Nicanor J. Liquido Tropical Fruit and Vegetable Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS Biocont.rol, Biology. Ecology, and Field Operations Research Unit P. O. Box 4459, Hilo. Hawaii 96720 J. Agric. Entomol. 10(:1):163-170 (July 1993) ABSTRACT The efTect offield sanitation in suppressing oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel, populations in 'Sunrise' pupaya (Cari.ca papaYfl L.) orchards was dele.'mined by comparing larval density and percentage infestation in mature green to fully ripe fruits sampled from fields with and without cultural practice of sanitation. In addition, the relative density of adults estimated using methyl eugenol-bailed traps was compared between orchards with and without sanitation. Sanitation involved removal of ripe fruits on trees and on the ground t ..... ice a week. The orcha,'ds without sanitation had an irregular harvesting pattern which resulted in abundant ripe fruits on trees and fallen, mtting fruits on the ground. Mature green fruits had no oriental fruit fly infestation; infestntion was obsCl"V'cd only in half- and fully·ripe fruits. Ol'iental fmit ny larval infestation (density and percent infested fruit> was lower in half- and fully-ripe fruits collected from the fields where sanitation was practiced. Likewise, the relativc density of ol'icntal fruit ny adults was lower in the orchards with sanitation. Field sanitation should, therefor'c, be an integral component of pest management methods aimed at suppressing oriental fruit ny population in papaya Ol"chards. KEY WORDS Insecta, Dipt.cra, Tcphritiduc, D(//:/l8, sanitation, suppression, pest management. -=-------------- Field sanitation is generally not practiced in commercial papaya (Carica papaya L.) orchards in Hawaii. Ripe fruits and those with abnormal shapes and sizes are removed from trees and left rotting on the ground. Adults of oriental fruit Oy, Da.cus dorsalis Hendel, and melon Oy, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett, oviposit in and feed readily on the exudate of these fallen fruits (Liquido et al. 1989, Liquido 1991a,b). Liquido (unpublished dalal found that the juice exuding from broken, ripe papaya fruit provides the nutrition necessary for normal female egg production and longevity of both male and female adults. Liquido (1991a) reported that fallen, ripe fruits on the ground serve as a reservoir of resident melon fly populations in papaya orchards; melon Oy does I 'J. Received ror publication 2 November 1992; accepted 22 .Jonunry 1993. This puper reports the results or research only. Mention or a proprietary product docs not constitute an endorsement by USDA. 163 164 J. AgT1C. Entomol. Vol. 10, No.3 (993) not normally infest papaya (McBride and Tanada 1949, Sea et aJ. 1982, Couey et al. 1984, Liquido et al. 1989, Liquido and Cunningham 1990, Liquido 1991b). In addition, Liquido (1991a,c) found that fruits on the ground have higher oriental fruit fly and melon fly larval densities than ripe fruits on trees. Therefore, a logical deduction from these intensive field studies is that sanitation, i.e., removal of ripe fruits on trees and on the ground, may be a valuable component of pest management methods to suppress oriental fruit ny and melon fly infestations in host commodities. This paper reports on the effect of field sanitation in suppressing OI;cntal fruit fly populations in 'Sunrise' papaya orchards on the island of Kauai. Hawaii. Materials and Methods Study site. The study was conducted in commercial ISunrisc' papaya orchards on the windward side of the island of I(auai. These orchards were situated at about 100 m elevation, with average monthly rainfall of 10-14 em, 16-2rC average monthly minimum temperature, and 24-28°C average monthly maximum temperature. Three I-ha fields with complete sanitation were selected as treatment plots. Ripe fruits were regularly removed from trees and the ground t\'nce a week in these plots. Likewise, three I-ha fields without field sanitation were selected and designated as control plots. Plots without field sanitation had an irregular harvesting pattern resulting in abundance of rotting fru.its on trees and on the ground. Treatment and control plots were sun-ounded by tropical forest with abundant wild guavas, Psidirtm guajaua L. and P. littoralle Radd.i, and Eugenia spp., which are suitable hosts of oriental fruit fly. Collection of fruit samples. Papaya fields were divided into equal quadrats (15 m by 15 m). Twenty-five quadrats were randomly selected in both the treatment and control plots. Trees at the middle of each quadrat were used as the sampling points; each quadrat had 20-25 trees. Each sample tree was marked with a flag tape, and farmers were requested not to harvest any fruit [Tom these trees. One mature green, one half-ripe, and one fully-ripe fruit were collected from each of the 25 sample trees per month. Sampling was done from May 1989 to August 1990. Determination of oriental fruit fly density in fruits. The methods of individual fruit holding, sifting of fruit and rearing medium for larvae and pupae, and rearing of recovered larvae and pupae to adults followed the "emergence method" described by Liquido et al. (1989). This method involved holding fruits individually in plastic buckets (3.78 liters) that. contained a 5-cm layer of wheat bran at the bottom. After 2 wk, pupating larvae and pupae were sifted from the fruits and placed in a plastic container (0.25 liter) with sand for pupation. Adults were allowed to emerge, then killed and preserved in alcohol for later ident.ification and counting. Adult trapping. The relative density of oriental fruit fly adults in t.he orchard was surveyed using Morrocan traps (Hafraoui et al. 1980) with 2.5-cm cotton wick impregnated with 2 ml of methyl eugenol (an oriental fruit fly male lure). Methyl eugenol (Agrisense, Fresno, California) applied in cotton wicks contained 2% (by volume) technical grade Naled (1,2-dibromo-2,2-dichloroethyl dimethyl phosphate [A. H. Robins, Richmond, Va.]) as a toxicant. Three traps were installed 50 m LIQUIDO: Suppression of Oriental Fruit Fly in Papaya 165 apart inside treatment and control plots. Trapping was done every 2 wk, with a 4-h trapping duration (0800-1200 h) during each trapping occasion. Trapping was done from September 1989 to August 1991. The use of methyl eugenol-baited traps is a recognized reliable method of estimating the relative abundance of oriental fruit fly populations (Harris et al. 1971, Vargas et al. 1983). Analyses of data. Data were sorted and summarized by plot, ripeness index and month of collection. The difference in mean oriental fruit fly larval density per fruit and mean percentage fruit with larvae ~ 1 in half- and fully·ripe fruit samples from fields with and without sanitation over time was determined by a single-factor repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA). Sampling periods (months) during which the fruit samples from both the sanitary and unsanitary fields had zero infestation were not included in ANOVA (Steel and Tome 1980). The variation in the relative density of oriental fruit fly adults caught in traps in fields with and without sanitation was also determined by a single-factor repeated measure ANOVA. ANOVA by ripeness index was performed because it has been established that oriental fruit fly infestation in 'Sunrise' papaya varies significantly with the degree of fruit ripeness (Liquido 1991c). Before ANOVA, the number of oriental fruit fly in fruits (lOglO[X + 1]) and traps (loglOx) were transformed to logarithmic values. The percentage oriental fruit fly infestation in sample fruits was transformed to arcsine values. Statistical analyses were done using SAs/STAT Release 6.03 (SAS Institute 1988). Discussion by Collyer and Enns (1986) was used as the statistical reference. Results Mature green fruits had no oriental fruit fly infestation; infestation was observed only in half- and fullYMripe fruits. Figs. 1 and 2 show the density and percentage infestation of oriental fruit flies in half- and fully-ripe fruits, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the results of repeated measures ANOVA showing consistently (through time) significant variation in larval density and percentage infestation of oriental fruit fly in half- and fully-ripe 'Sunrise' papayas sampled from fields with and without cultural practice of sanitation. Half- and fully-ripe fruits from clean, sanitary fields had 63% and 79% lower larval density, respectively, than fruits of the same levels of maturity from dirty fields without sanitation (Fig. 1). Similarly, the percentage oriental fruit fly infestation in half and fully-ripe fruits from sanitary fields was 84% and 83% lower, respectively, than those from unsanitary fields (Fig. 2). The relative density of oriental fruit fly male adults in sanitary and unsanitary fields val;ed significantly, with the adult population being consistently less dense in the field with sanitation (Table 1) (Fig. 3). Discussion Liquido (1991b) reported and discussed the density and percentage infestation of oriental fruit fly in 'Sunrise' papaya, with appropriate emphasis on variation of oriental fruit fly infestation due to the degree of fru.it ripeness and the absence of J. Agric. Entomol. Vol. 10, No.3 (1993) 166 o • Without sanitation Wrth sanitation 6 Half ripe OX = 0.33, SEM=0.21 • X" = 0.90, SEM=0.45 4 f - 2 o .I ~ 35 .~ 30 o c .11 , , Fully ripe OX= 2.70,SEM=1.12 • X= m 25 " , 12.62, SEM ~2.59 20 15 10 5 o M J J A 1989 SON • 0 I Iril .:.J.....:.F-'M"--,==A~M'-J=-.:.J---'-'A 1990 Fig. 1. Density of oriental fruit fly in half.. and fully-ripe 'Sunrise' papaya fruits sampled from fields with and without sanitation, May 1989-August 1990, Kauai, Hawaii. Each value shown is the mean number of larvae per frult per month. any infestation in mature green and color break fruits. He attributed the infestation-free status of mature green and color break 'Sunrise' fruits to: (1) the preference of ol"iental fruit fly females to oviposit in half-ripe and I'iper fruits; and (2) the low population density of oriental fruit Oy adults in the orchard, which consequently results in an extremely low probability of oviposition in the less prefen'ed mature green and color break fruits. The practice of field sanitation in 'Sunrise' papaya orchard may, therefore, maintain the absence of oriental fruit fly infestation in mature green and color break fruits. Although, sanitation has long been recommended as a cultural method to control Mediterranean fruit Oy, Ceratitis capitala (\Viedemann) (Back and Pemberton 1918), oriental fruit fly <Van Zwaluwenbw'g 1947), and melon fly (Back and Pemberton 1917, Nishida and Bess 1950, 1957) in several host commodities, its practice has not been widely implemented in Hawaii because it is labor intensive, can be costly, and requires coordination and cooperation among LIQUIDO: Suppression of Oriental Fruit Fly in Papaya o With sanitation • 167 Without sanitation 25 Half ripe 20 OX = 0.47, SEM=0.27 • X= 2.85, SEM=I.32 OX = • X= 23.49, SEM=4.35 15 ; ~ .~ . .E c 10 ·C 5 ~ 0 .c ~ ~ ." ~ ~ ~ .~ .E 0 70 Fully ripe 60 50 4.04, SEM=I.47 C •~ 40 ~ a. c ~ • ::; 30 20 10 o M J J A SON 1989 D J F M A M J J A 1990 Fig. 2. Percentage infestation of oriental fruit fly in half- and fully-ripe 'Sunrise' papaya fruits sampled from fields with and without sanitation, May 1989 August 1990, Kauai, Hawaii. Each value shown is the mean percent infested fruit per month. neighboring growers. Sanitation may involve collecting ripe fruits on the ground and unwanted fiuits on trees, shrubs, or vines and disposing these fruits either by burrowing deep in the soil, burning, or application v.rith insecticides. Because of the extreme polyphagy of oriental fruit fly (U. S. D. A. 1983), a sanitation program may include removal of other breeding or alternate hosts growing within and along borders of the field or orchard. Data presented here clearly show that sanitation results in a significant reduction of oriental fruit fly larval infestation in fruits and suppression of adults in the orchard. The observed suppression of oriental fruit ny population in the orchard by removal of ripe fruits on trees and on the ground may be explained by two factors. One, sanitation limits the biomass of ripe fruits that are preferred by females for oviposition and serve as suitable hosts ror larval development. Two, removal of ripe fruits results in a significant reduction in number of oriental fruit ny adults immigrating, foraging, and residing in the orchard. It must be emphasized that sanitation maintained a low level oflarval infestation and adult J. Agrie. EntomoL Vol. 10, No.3 0993} 168 Table I. Summary of repeated measure ANOVA on tbe infestation rates (larval density per fruit, percent infested fruit, and relative density of trapped adults) of oriental fruit fly in 'Sunrise' papaya orchards with and without sanitation (May 1989August 1990, Kauai, Hawaii)ll. b, C ANOVA values df SS MS 1 8 8 0.419 0.853 0.467 0.419 0.107 0.058 7.72 1.96 1.07 0.009 0.086 0.407 1 8 8 0.032 0.052 0.049 0.032 0.006 0.006 12.46 2.49 2.34 0.001 0.033 0.043 1 13 13 8.446 8.458 2.533 8.446 0.195 76.88 5.92 1.77 0.0001 0.0001 0.076 Mean percent infested fruit Field type Time Field type * time 1 13 13 1.319 1.055 0.612 1.319 0.081 0.047 73.23 4.50 2.61 0.0001 0.0001 0.008 Mean number adults per trap Field type Time Field type * time 1 11 11 2.096 12.331 2.096 1.121 0.224 28.59 15.28 3.06 0.0001 0.0001 0.004 Source of variation F P Half ripe Mean larval density per fruit Field type Time Field type * time Mean percent infested fruit Field type Time Field type * time Fully ripe Mean larval density per fruit Field type Time Field type * time 2.465 O.65L Repeated measure ANOVA was performed on transformed data: Jog lo (mean larval density per fruit + 1), loglo (menn number adults per trap), and arcsine-Lransformed percenL infcsted froiL h Field t.ype: with sanitation vs. without. sanitation. r Time: includes only months during which the measured variables were> 0 for either one of the two types of fields, or both. Q density in the clean, sanitary field despite its close proximity to abundant, suitable reservoir hosts of oriental fruit fly. This observation strengthens the hypothesis that field sanitation has a consequent significant reduction in adult immigration, foraging, and residence in the orchard; i. e., reduction in number of females foraging for food and oviposition site and males searching for mate and food. Sanitation together with adult mass trapping and releases of sterile adults has been successfully implemented in the suppression of several medically important dipterous insects (Knipling 1979). Aside from the direct importance of field sanitation in the integrated central oftephritid fruit fly pests, it has been proposed LIQUIDO: Suppression of Oriental Fruit Fly in Papaya 169 Q With sanijation • Wijhout sanijation 500,-----------------_ o X= 400 77.77, SEM=20.37 • X = 150.27, SEM=37.71 a. ~ 300 Q; a. -=> ~ 200 ]g c .~ oc 100 '" Q) ::;: o S o N o J F M 1989 A M J J A 1990 Fig. 3. Relative density of oriental fruit fly males caught in traps with methyl eugenol + Naled per 4 h exposure in 'Sunrise' papaya orchards, September 1989-August 1990, Kauai, Hawaii. Each value is the mean number of adult males caught per trap per 4 h. as a primary component of commodity quarantine treatments for papaya. For instance, removal of all quarter-ripe and riper fruits on trees and the ground is required for the certification of the proposed systems approach quarantine treatment for tephritid fruit Oy infestations (which may include Mediterranean fruit fly, Anastrepha spp., and Toxotrypa,na curvicaudata [GerstaeckerJ) in 'Sunrise,' 'I<apoho Solo,' and 'Waimanalo' papayas grown in Costa Rica and intended for expOIt to the mainland United States (A. P. H. I. S. 1992). Acknowledgment I thank the technical assistance of Heide Ketter and Darlene Babin (USDA ARS, Kauai) for fruit collection and processing for fruit Oy infestation; and Paul Barr and Lei Shinoda (USDA-ARS, Hilo) for data management. Special thanks are extended to papaya farmers in Kilauea and Moloaa, Kauai for the cooperation. 170 J. Agric. Entomol. Vol. 10, No.3 (1993) References Cited Animal nnd Plnnt Health Inspedion Service. 1992. 7CFR Part 319 [Docket No. 91-068-2]. Importation of papayas from Costa Rica. Federal Registel' 57: 27696-27898. Back, E. A" nnd C. E. Pemberton. 1917. The melon ny in Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 491, Washington, D. C., 64 pp. 1918. The Mediterranean fruit ny in Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 536, Washington, D. C., 118 pp. Collyer, C. E., and J. T. Eons. 1986. Analysis ofvariancc: the basic designs. Nelson-Halls Publishers, Chicago, 310 pp. Couey, H. M., E. S. Linse, and A. N. Nakamura. 1984. Quarantine procedure for Hawaiian papayas using heat and cold treatments. J. Econ. EntomoJ. 77: 984-988. Hafraoui, A, E. J. Harris, nnd A Chakir. 1980. Plastic traps fot detection and survey of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capilala (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Morocco. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 23: 199-204. Harris, E. J., S. Nakagawa, and T. Urago. 1971. Sticky traps for detection and survey of three t.ephritids. J. Econ. Enlomol. 64: 62·65. Knipling, E. F. 1979. The basics principles of insect population suppression and management.. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 512, Washington, D. C., 623 pp. Liquido, N. J. 1991a. Fruit on the ground as a reservoir of resident melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations in papaya orchards. Environ. Entomol. 20: 620-625. 1991b. Infestation rates of oriental fruit fly (Diptcra: Tephritidae) in 'Sunrise' papaya by visual and colorimetric ripeness indices. J. Econ. Entomol. 84: 948-953. 1991c. Effect of ripeness and location of papaya fruits on parasitization rates of oriental fruit fly and melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) by braconid (Hymenoptera) parasitoids. Environ. Entomol. 20: 1732·1736. Liquido, N. J., and R. T. Cunningham. 1990. Colorimetry of papaya fruits as an index of infestation rates of oriental fruit fly and melon fly (Diptern: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 476-484. Liquido, N. J., R. T. Cunningham, and H. M. Couey. 1989. Infestation rates of papaya by fruit flics (Diptera: 'l'cphritidae) in relation to the degree of fruit ripeness. J. Econ. Entomol. 82: 213-219. McBride, O. C., and Y. Tannda. 1949. A l'Cvised list of host plants of the melon fly in Hawaii. ?roc. Hawaii. Entomo1. &C. 13: 411-421. Nishida, T., and H. A Bess. 1950. Applied ecology in melon fly control. J. Econ. Entomol. 43: 877-883. 1957. Studies on the ecology and control of the melon fly Dacus (Strumeta) cucurbitae Coquillett(Diptera: Tephritidae). Hawaii Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 34: 1·44. SAS Institute. 1988. SASISTAT user's guide, release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 1028 pp. Seo. S. T., G. J. Farias, and E. J. Harris. 1982. Oriental fruit fly: ripening of fruit and its effect on index of infestation of Hawaiian papayas. J. Ecan. Enlomol. 75: 173·175. Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and practice of statistics: a biometrical approach, 2nd cd. McGraw-Hill Co., Inc., New York, 633 pp. United States Department of Agriculture. 1983. Host list: oriental fruit ny, Dacus dorsalis Hendel. Biological Assessment Support Staff, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Hyattsville, Maryland, 27 pp. Van Zwaluwenburg, R.. H. 1947. No~s and exhibition. Proc. Hawaii. Entomo!. Soc. 13: 8. Vargas, R. I., T. Nishida. and J. W. Beardsley. 19&3. Distribution and abundance of Dacus dorsalis (Diptera: Tephrilidae) in native and exotic forest area on Kauai. Environ. Entomol. 12: 1185-1189.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz