Competition • Intraspecific – Between individuals of the same species • Interspecific – Between individuals of different species • Which one is stronger? Interspecific Competition Competition K − N −α N dN1 1 12 2 = r1 N1 1 dt K1 K − N −α N dN 2 2 21 1 = r2 N 2 2 dt K2 • Lotka-Voltera Interspecific competiton – Convert individuals of species 1 into species 2 equivalents. -α12 Amount of spp.1’s niche overlapped by spp 2’s niche - α 21 Amount of spp.2’s niche overlapped by spp 1’s niche 1 Competition • What happens to species 1 in the presence of species 2? K1/α12 dN1/dt =0 N2 N1 K1 Competition • What happens to species 1 in the presence of species 2? K1/α12 dN1/dt =0 N2 N1 K1 Competition • What happens to species 2 in the presence of species 1? K2 dN2/dt =0 N2 N1 K2/α21 2 Competition • What happens to species 2 in the presence of species 1? K2 N2 dN2/dt =0 N1 K2/α21 Competition K1/α12 K2 dN1/dt =0 N2 N1 N2 K1 dN2/dt =0 N1 K2/α21 Competition K2 K1/α12 N2 N1 K1 K2/α21 Species 2 wins 3 Competition K1/α12 K2 K1/α12 K2 N2 N2 N1 K1 K2/α21 N1 Species 2 wins K2/α21 K1 Species 1 wins Competition K2 N2 K1/α12 N1 K2/α21 K1 Unknown who wins But somebody loses Competition K1/α12 K2 N2 K1/α12 K2 N2 N1 K2/α21 Unknown who wins But somebody loses K1 N1 K1 K2/α21 Both species win Coexistence 4 Competition • What are the requirements for K1/α12 coexistence? – K1/α12 > K 2 K2 • K1 > α12 K 2 – K1 > K2/α21 N 2 • K2 > α21 K 1 – Translation? N1 K1 K2/α21 Competition • What are the requirements for coexistence? – K1/α12 > K2 KPH/αPH,MD • K1 > α12 K2 KMD – K1 > K2/α21 • K2 > α21 K1 NMD – Translation? • Species coexistence occurs when each species limits its own population growth more than its growth is limited by the other species Interspecific > Intraspecific? Interspecific < Intraspecific? N1 KPH KMD/αMD,PH Competition • • Example Yellowstone ungulates – KPH > αPH,MD KMD – KMD > α MD,PH KPH Pronghorn Antelope 2000 N Mule Deer 1000 Time 5 Competition • • Example Yellowstone ungulates – KPH > αPH,MD KMD – KMD > α MD,PH KPH Pronghorn Antelope 2000 N Mule Deer 1000 KPH = 2000 KMD = 1200 Time Competition • • Example Yellowstone ungulates – KPH > αPH,MD KMD – KMD > α MD,PH KPH Pronghorn Antelope 2000 N Mule Deer 1000 KPH = 2000 KMD = 1200 Time Resource Use / day g Grass g Forbs PH 80 15 MD 20 100 g Shrubs 0 100 Competition • • Example Yellowstone ungulates – KPH > αPH,MD KMD – KMD > α MD,PH KPH Convert pronghorn into mule deer αMD,PH : niche overlap = 35/220 =16% Convert mule deer into pronghorn αPH,MD : niche overlap = 35/95 =37% Pronghorn Antelope 2000 N Mule Deer 1000 KPH = 2000 KMD = 1200 Time Resource Use / day g Grass g Forbs PH 80 15 MD 20 100 g Shrubs 0 100 6 Competition • • Example Yellowstone ungulates – KPH > αPH,MD KMD – 2000 > 0.37*1200 – 2000 > 444 – KMD > αMD,PH KPH – 1200 > 0.16*2000 – 1200 > 320 Pronghorn Antelope 2000 N Mule Deer 1000 KPH = 2000 KMD = 1200 Time Convert pronghorn into mule deer αMD,PH : niche overlap = 35/220 =16% Convert mule deer into pronghorn αPH,MD : niche overlap = 35/95 =37% Resource Use / day g Grass g Forbs PH 80 15 MD 20 100 g Shrubs 0 100 Competition Sp.1 survives but R0=1 ZNGI 1 • Tillman competition – Resource based – Graph of the amount of resources a species needs in order to survive Amt. of resource Y Sp.1 survives and reproduces Sp.1 does not survive Amount of resource X Competition • Tillman competition – Resource based – Graph of the amount of resources a species needs in order to survive for both species – Can both species survive? ZNGI1 Amt. of resource Y Sp.2 survives but R0=1 ZNGI 2 Sp.2 survives and reproduces Amount of resource X 7 Competition • Tillman competition – Resource based – Graph of the amount of resources a species needs in order to survive for both species – If resources fall anywhere in area A ZNGI1 ZNGI2 Amt. of resource Y C • Neither species survives B A Amount of resource X Competition • Tillman competition – Resource based – Graph of the amount of resources a species needs in order to survive for both species – If resources fall anywhere in area A ZNGI1 ZNGI2 Amt. of resource Y C • Neither species survives B – If resources fall anywhere in area B • Only species 1 survives A Amount of resource X Competition • Tillman competition – Resource based – Graph of the amount of resources a species needs in order to survive for both species – If resources fall anywhere in area A ZNGI1 ZNGI2 Amt. of resource Y • Neither species survives C – If resources fall anywhere in area B B • Only species 1 survives – If resources fall anywhere in area C • Only species 1 survives A Amount of resource X 8 Competition ZNGI1 ZNGI2 • But what if the ZNGIs overlap? C1 Amt. of resource Y – Need to determine relative consumption rates of the resources for each species. C2 Amount of resource X Competition ZNGIPH ZNGIMD C Shrub density • But what if the ZNGIs overlap? CMD – It depends on the relative consumption rate of the resources for each competitor – Grass density is more limiting for pronghorns. – Shrub density is more limiting for mule deer. D B E CPH F A • A - Neither spp. survives • B - Mule deer win • F - Pronghorn win Grass density Competition ZNGIPH ZNGIMD • C Shrub density B • C - Mule deer win D – More shrubs available then grass E A But what if the ZNGIs overlap? – Grass density is more limiting for pronghorns. – Shrub density is more limiting for mule deer. CMD F CPH • D - Coexistence – Each species consumes relatively more of its limiting resource – The relative availability of the two resources must be between the two consumption vectors. • E - Pronghorn win – More grass available than shrubs Grass density 9 Competition ZNGIPH ZNGIMD • C Shrub density B But what if the ZNGIs overlap? – Grass density is more limiting for pronghorns. – Shrub density is more limiting for mule deer. CMD • C - Mule deer win D – More shrubs available then grass E CPH • D - Unknown who will win but only one species will survive • E - Pronghorn win – More grass available than shrubs F A Grass density Competition • Lotka-Voltera – Implicitly concerned with resources – Explicitly concerned with population sizes – Provides estimate of equilbrium size of both species – Allows determination of winning competitor or coexistence • Tilman – Explicitly concerned with resources – Implicitly concerned with population sizes – Doesn’t provides estimate of equilbrium size of both species – Allows determination of winning competitor or coexistence 10
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz