Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy Sponsored by: October 2015 2 FORWARD This study, sponsored by Entrust Datacard, explores the market for instant issuance of debit cards in-branch from the perspective of issuers and consumers. Revenue opportunities, and customer experience and satisfaction associated with instant issuance were investigated. This study and whitepaper were independently produced by JAVELIN. JAVELIN maintains complete independence in its data collection, findings, and analysis. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EVERYTHING NOW: CONSUMER DEMANDS FOR IMMEDIACY ............................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 5 Key Findings ........................................................................................... 5 Recommendations ................................................................................. 6 THE ECONOMICS OF INSTANT ISSUANCE............................................................. 7 Interchange ............................................................................................ 7 Activation and Fraud Risk ...................................................................... 8 Issuer Size Considerations ..................................................................... 9 INSTANT ISSUANCE AND CONSUMER PERCEPTION ........................................... 10 Full Engagement Faster With In-Branch Issuance ............................... 10 Satisfaction with the Issuance Experience ........................................... 12 The Instant-Issuance Halo Effect: Overall Satisfaction Is Higher With Instant-Issuance Banks ........................................................................ 14 Instant Issuance Improves Customers’ Opinion of Many Areas of Issuers’ Performance ........................................................................... 16 Word of Mouth is Key .......................................................................... 17 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 18 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 19 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Mean Number of Days for Centrally Issued Card Delivery, by FI Size ... 7 Figure 2: Interchange Revenue, Instant Issuance vs. Central Issuance of Debit Cards .................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3: Instant- Issuance Cardholders, by FI Type ............................................. 9 Figure 4: Length of Time Account Owned and Reason for Receiving Card ........ 11 Figure 5: Perceptions of the Debit Card Issuance Experience, Instant Issuance Debit Card vs. Central Issuance Debit Card ........................................................ 12 Figure 6: How Owners of Centrally Issued Cards View Instant Issuance ........... 13 Figure 7: Bank Satisfaction, Instantly Issued Debit Cardholders vs. Centrally Issued Debit Cardholders .................................................................................. 14 Figure 8: Overall Satisfaction With the Issuing Bank After a Lost or Stolen Debit Card Is Replaced by IIDC or Central Issuance ..................................................... 15 Figure 9: Bank Perception, Instant-Issuance Debit Card vs. Non-Instant-Issuance Debit Card .......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 10: Percentage of Instant and Central Issuance Customers Having Recommended Issuer, Past 12 Months ............................................................. 17 javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 4 EVERYTHING NOW: CONSUMER DEMANDS FOR IMMEDIACY One of the most apparent consumer trends today is the shift in expectations around immediacy. As content such as movies, music, and games have become digitized, on-demand access has become the norm. These expectations have permeated other aspects of our lives: Online retail is shortening delivery windows for physical goods from days to hours, and in the payments industry the transfer and settlement of funds is being pushed toward a new, real-time paradigm. This culture of raised expectations sets the stage for the instant issuance of payment cards. As this paper demonstrates, shifting payment card distribution from central issuance by mail to instant issuance in a branch has both financial and, perhaps more important, reputational benefits for financial institutions. Instant issuance meets consumer demands for immediacy, and wins favor for the issuing FI. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key Findings Issuers benefit from $0.50 to $0.77 in incremental lift per card from interchange in the first month after a card is issued. In the five days a customer would have been waiting for a centrally issued card to arrive in the mail, cardholders who received their card instantly in the branch will be transacting and accruing interchange for the issuer. Issuers can effectively use the 5–15 minutes it takes to print a card inbranch to deepen relationships. FI executives reported that employees in their branches use this time effectively to get to know customers’ needs and take the opportunity to cross-sell products and services. Customers value the convenience of instant issuance, and its halo effect extends to overall satisfaction with the bank. Cardholders are 22% more likely to be very-to-extremely satisfied with their bank overall if they received an instantly issued card instead of a centrally issued card. Instant-issuance customers are also more likely to believe their bank is innovative (64% vs. 48%), is a great finance partner (57% vs. 45%), and communicates effectively (65% vs. 53%). The satisfaction gap between banks with and without instant issuance is wider for customers replacing lost or stolen cards. Instant-issuance customers were 30% more likely to be very-to-extremely satisfied with their bank overall when replacing a lost or compromised card compared to those whose cards were centrally issued. In today’s climate of frequent data breaches and requisite card replacements, this could have significant value in winning customer loyalty and appreciation. Up to 40% of centrally issued debit cards are never activated, but activation may reach 100% for instantly issued cards. FI executives placed card activation rates at 60–70% for centrally issued cards, but activation of instantly issued cards in-branch can mean rates could reach 100%. 1 1 Javelin interviews with industry executives, August 2015. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 6 Recommendations Instant Issuance clearly resonates with cardholders, but the benefits are not fully realized if this information isn’t articulated. If your institution already uses instant issuance, make sure to advertise this feature to new and existing customers who request cards online. Although asking a customer to make a trip to the branch might introduce undue friction to the process some of the time, other customers would rather have their card several days sooner. Offering the option to pick up a card in-branch gives customers control and makes an institution appear considerate and flexible. When deciding to implement instant issuance, consider hardware for printing EMV cards. Although these machines and cards may be more costly, EMV will soon be ubiquitous and consumers will shift away from non-EMV cards. Additional studies by Javelin have shown that EMV card awareness can also have a significant benefit on the perception of an FI as secure and innovative. The crossselling opportunity at the point of instant issuance is a perfect time for articulating the benefits of EMV to the customer. Tighten Know-Your-Customer (KYC) protocol in the branch. Although instant issuance will make a dent in mail fraud, training employees to recognize inperson fraud schemes will help to reduce new-account fraud and account takeovers that take advantage of instant activation. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 7 THE ECONOMICS OF INSTANT ISSUANCE Instant issuance offers long-term cost savings as well as additional revenue in the first month after each card is issued. Over time, these financial benefits offset the cost of initial investment in hardware: Interchange from five days of transactions when the card would have been in transit Increased card-activation rates from in-branch activation Decreased fraud from intercepted mail and unauthorized activation and use of cards Interchange A Javelin survey of U.S. cardholders conducted in June 2015 determined that a centrally issued card takes an average of five days to reach the cardholder through the U.S. Postal Service (Figure 1). For those five days of the first month, the issuing bank cannot generate any revenue from interchange. Large Regional and Community Banks’ Customers Lose the Most Time to Central Issuance Figure 1: Mean Number of Days for Centrally Issued Card Delivery, by FI Size Credit union 4.8 Community bank 5.5 Large regional bank 5.3 Giant bank 4.6 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Number of days for card to arrive Q8. You stated that your new/replacement debit card was mailed to you. How many business days did it take for the card to arrive? Mean number of days shown. Does not include next-day mail recipients. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 5.0 6.0 June 2015, n= 150 Base: Consumers who received non IIDC replacement debit card in mail in past two years. © 2015 GA Javelin Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 8 The average U.S. consumer uses a debit card 13 to 20 times per month, so a bank relying on central issuance loses interchange for 2.2 to 3.3 transactions, or between $0.50 and $0.77 per card in the first month of issuance. With instant issuance and no five-day wait time, the cards are free for use immediately, and therefore the full interchange value of the card can be realized in the first month (Figure 2). FIs Generate An Extra $0.50 to $0.77 in Interchange on Instantly Issued Cards Figure 2: Interchange Revenue, Instant Issuance vs. Central Issuance of Debit Cards Method Number of Purchases Per Month Average Interchange Fee Per Transaction Number of Days Delayed Central Issuance 13-20 $0.23 5 Instant Issuance 13-20 $0.23 0 Average Incremental Lift $0.50 - $0.77 © 2015 GA Javelin Activation and Fraud Risk Further advantages accrue to banks that activate instantly issued cards while the customer is in the branch. Financial institution executives place the rate of activation for centrally issued cards at 60% to 70%, whereas 100% of instantly issued cards were activated on the spot.2 This method also entails fewer risks because identity verification in-branch is more robust than over the phone, and a direct handoff from teller to customer ensures that the card is not intercepted en route. 2 Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. 3 Ibid. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 9 Issuer Size Considerations Despite the costs of implementation, large FIs do not appear to hold a demonstrable advantage over smaller institutions in offering instant issuance. In fact, cardholders stating they had received an instant-issuance debit card in the past 24 months were more likely to come from a credit union than a larger financial institution (Figure 3). Smaller Issuers Lead the Shift to Instant Issuance Figure 3: Instant- Issuance Cardholders, by FI Type Card was centrally issued Card was instantly issued 44% Credit union 56% 49% Community bank 51% Large regional bank 46% 54% 54% Giant bank 46% 0% 10% Instant Issuance Status by Bank Size 20% 30% 40% Percentage of consumers 50% 60% June 2015, n= 150, 150 Base: Consumers who received instantly issued cards in past 2 years, consumers who received centrally issued cards in past two years. © 2015 GA Javelin Smaller institutions such as community banks and credit unions have expressed clear benefits from the instant-issuance model: “There’s a change in consumer behavior and expectations. And yes, you can make the monetary [argument] that says if you get the card earlier they are more likely to use the card, but we asked consumers how important [it is] that [they’re] able to get the debit card in-branch and…millennials said, ‘Yeah, I would pick my bank on that issue.’” - Community bank executive4 4 Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 10 INSTANT ISSUANCE AND CONSUMER PERCEPTION Although the economic justification for instant issuance over central issuance is solid, instant issuance should not be measured purely by the potential lift in interchange revenue and card activation. In today’s consumer payment landscape, expectations have been significantly raised in terms of speed and convenience for delivery of goods and services, and financial institutions are not immune to heightened consumer demands. As this section of the paper demonstrates, providing instant-issuance capabilities has a significant upside in improving the perception of a financial institution across a wide variety of attributes and also provides an opportunity for cross-selling and increasing consumer engagement. Full Engagement Faster With In-Branch Issuance Meeting customer expectations is the primary reason for implementing instant issuance among all FI executives interviewed. However, several also noted the cross-selling opportunity in having the extra few minutes in-branch with the customer.6 Taking the extra time to promote customer engagement is especially important when onboarding new customers, who make up a larger proportion of instant-issuance recipients than do those requesting replacement cards. 5 Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. 6 Ibid. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 11 In fact, instant-issuance cardholders were more than twice as likely to say that they received it while opening a new account, while those receiving centrally issued cards were more likely to be renewing expired cards (see figure 4). This finding is supported by statements of FI executives who indicate that their institutions may still use central issuance for reissues in order to avoid the friction of asking their customers to come into the branch. However, 10% of instantissuance recipients requested the card online or over the phone and had it mailed to them next-day from the branch, and 31% picked up the card in-branch after requesting it remotely, indicating that this friction might not be such a barrier for customers as expected. Instantly Issued Cards Are More Likely to Have Been Issued for New Accounts Than Reissues Figure 4: Length of Time Account Owned and Reason for Receiving Card IIDC Percentage of consumers 100% 87% 90% Non-IIDC I opened a new checking account and got a new debit card 13% 33% 80% 68% 70% 50% My debit card was expiring and I got it replaced 28% 60% My debit card number was compromised or had fraud and I replaced it with a new debit card 50% 40% 20% 12% I lost my debit card and replaced it 30% 20% 19% 17% 10% 4% I had my debit card replaced for some other reason 0% Less than One to less Two years one year than two or more years Q4C. How long have you had your bank account with [the issuing bank]? Q5:. Have you done any of the following in the past 2 years? javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 13% 15% 9% 5% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% June 2015, n= 150, 150 Base: IIDC recipients, Non-IIDC recipients. © 2015 GA Javelin Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 12 Satisfaction with the Issuance Experience Customer perceptions of the issuance process reveal a strong preference for (and expectation of) instant issuance (Figure 6). Instant issuance customers are more likely to agree with an array of positive statements about the issuance process, by a margin of up to 15 percentage points. Although roughly half of central issuance cardholders did not report strong positive impressions of the issuance process, however, fewer also reported that they would have been majorly inconvenienced by having to wait longer. That customers who received their cards within one day were more likely to feel it would have been inconvenient to wait longer indicates that once a customer has experienced this level of convenience, he or she quickly comes to expect it. Instant Issuance Cardholders Report More Positive Impressions of the Issuance Experience Figure 5: Perceptions of the Debit Card Issuance Experience, Instant Issuance Debit Card vs. Central Issuance Debit Card Card was centrally issued Card was instantly issued 55% The card requesting and receiving experience was very satisfactory 69% 52% I was happy to be able to use the card so soon 67% 55% The card requesting and receiving process was very convenient 65% 44% The card issuing process improved my overall impression of the bank 58% 43% The card issuing process improved my impression of the bank’s security 57% 45% It would have been a major inconvenience to have to wait longer for my card 57% 37% 35% How quickly I received the card did not make any difference to me 0% Q10a. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your experience receiving your new debit card from (...)? Top 2, strongly agree shown. 7 20% 40% 60% Percentage of consumers 80% June 2015, n= 150, 150. Base: Consumers who received IIDC in past two years, consumers who received non-IIDC in past 2 years. © 2015 GA Javelin Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 13 Another important test of the desirability of instant issuance is how the process would be viewed by those who have yet to experience in-branch card delivery. Fifty-five percent of cardholders whose cards were centrally issued stated that they would find instant issuance to be extremely convenient. Another 43% stated that the feature would improve their overall impression of the bank, and 42% stated that they would be more likely to recommend this bank to others because of instant issuance (Figure 7). This last statement is also substantiated with reports of actual behavior (see figure 10). Central Issuance Cardholders Say it Would Be “Convenient” and “A Relief” To Use Card Sooner Figure 6: How Owners of Centrally Issued Cards View Instant Issuance I would find this to be extremely convenient 55% It would be a relief to be able to use my debit card so soon 51% This feature would improve my overall impression of the bank 43% I would be more likely to recommend this bank to others because of this feature 42% This feature would improve my impression of my bank’s security 42% Waiting for the new card by mail is a major incovenience 31% It does not matter to me to have to wait a few days to receive my debit card 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Percentage of consumers Q10b. If your bank issued such instant debit cards, how would you feel about that? Top 2, strongly agree shown. 8 50% 60% June 2015, n= 150. Base: Consumers who received non-IIDC in past 2 years. © 2015 GA Javelin Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 14 The Instant-Issuance Halo Effect: Overall Satisfaction Is Higher With Instant-Issuance Banks The satisfaction-gap between instant and central issuance cardholders does not end with the experience of requesting and receiving the cards. In fact, consumers who received their card through instant issuance are 22% more likely to say they are very-to-extremely satisfied with the issuing institution overall (see figure 8 below), and are also more likely to hold an array of positive beliefs about the institution (See figure 5) Seventy-one percent of instant-issuance debit card recipients rated their satisfaction with the issuing institution as a 9 or 10 out of 10, compared with just 58% of cardholders whose cards were centrally issued. On the opposite end of the spectrum, cardholders expressing dissatisfaction in their issuing bank (scoring 4 or below) were twice as likely to have received centrally issued cards. Although the greater satisfaction from recipients of instantly issued debit cards cannot be entirely attributed to instant issuance, higher satisfaction with the issuance process itself suggests that the process does indeed improve cardholder satisfaction (see figure 3). Instant Issuance Customers Are 22% More Likely to be Highly Satisfied with Their Issuer Figure 7: Bank Satisfaction, Instantly Issued Debit Cardholders vs. Centrally Issued Debit Cardholders Extremely satisfied 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Not at all satisfied 1% Card was centrally issued 35% 23% 19% 13% 1% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1% Card was instantly issued 51% 0% 20% 20% 40% 60% Percentage of consumers Q9a. On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 means 'Not at all satisfied' and 10 means 'Extremely satisfied', how satisfied are you with your issuing bank? javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 19% 80% 5%2% 1% 100% June 2015, n= 150, 150 Base: Consumers who received IIDC in past two years, consumers who received non IIDC in past two years © 2015 GA Javelin Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 15 An overall satisfaction score is useful in determining the value of instant-issuance debit cards over alternatives, but a more nuanced view of how perception is improved provides clarity on just what attributes of the bank experience are enhanced through offering instant issuance. The gap in overall satisfaction for instant vs. central issuance is further widened in cases of reissuance when the original card befell a misfortune such as being lost or compromised. When consumers are already inconvenienced by such an event, they react even more strongly to the delay in receiving their card: Those saying they were extremely satisfied with their bank overall fell from 35% to 26% (see figures 7 and 8). Thus, the institution’s ability to quickly remedy the situation when the customer loses access to his or her card is reflected in the customer’s perception of the institution as a whole. Customers Receiving Centrally Issued Replacements for Lost/Stolen Cards Are Much Less Satisfied Figure 8: Overall Satisfaction With the Issuing Bank After a Lost or Stolen Debit Card Is Replaced by IIDC or Central Issuance 10 - Extremely satisfied Lost or stolen card centrally issued 9 8 26% 7 30% 6 5 4 3 15% 2 1- not at all satisfied 19% 4% 2% 0% 2% Lost or compromis ed card instantly issued 51% 0% 10% 20% 30% 22% 40% 50% 60% Percentage of consumers Q9a. On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 means 'Not at all satisfied' and 10 means 'Extremely satisfied', how satisfied are you with your issuing bank? 9 18% 70% 80% 2%2% 90% 100% June 2015, n= 49, 47. Base: Consumers with lost/compromised debit cards issued instantly, consumers with lost/compromised debit cards issued centrally. © 2015 GA Javelin Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 16 Instant Issuance Improves Customers’ Opinion of Many Areas of Issuers’ Performance Compared to those whose cards were centrally issued, instant-issuance debit cardholders had a higher opinion of their primary FI than non-instant issuance debit cardholders in such categories as customer friendliness, trustworthiness, reliability, innovation, and being technologically advanced. Particularly notable is that, by a margin of 12 percentage points, instant-issuance debit cardholders viewed their primary FI as a “great finance partner” (Figure 5). Instant Issuance Cardholders Hold a Higher Opinion of the Issuing Bank Figure 9: Bank Perception, Instant-Issuance Debit Card vs. Non-Instant-Issuance Debit Card Card was centrally issued Card was instantly issued 63% Is customer friendly 69% 60% Is trustworthy 67% 59% Is flexible and serves my needs 67% 59% Is reliable 66% 65% 65% Is safe and secure to bank with 53% Communicates effectively 65% 48% Is innovative 64% 57% 61% Is technologically advanced 45% Is a great finance partner 57% 0% 10% Q9b. Using a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means 'Strongly Disagree' and 10 means 'Strongly Agree', please rate how well each of the following statements describes your issuing bank. Top 2, strongly agree shown. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 20% 30% 40% 50% Percentage of consumers 60% 70% 80% June 2015, n= 150, 150. Base: Consumers who received IIDC in past two years, consumers who received non-IIDC in past 2 years. © 2015 GA Javelin Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 17 Word of Mouth is Key Perhaps the most important implication of a good reputation is the business it generates by word of mouth. Customers who received their cards via instant issuance are 37% more likely to have recommended the issuing institution to a friend or family member in the past 12 months compared to those who received the card via central issuance (see figure xx below). Although the rate at which the advice was taken is unknown, nearly three out of five instant issuance customers referred new acquisitions to the institution that issued their debit card, potentially expanding the institution’s customer base significantly. Three in Five Instant Issuance Cardholders Have Recommended Their Issuer to a Friend Figure 10: Percentage of Instant and Central Issuance Customers Having Recommended Issuer, Past 12 Months Card was instantly issued 59% Card was centrally issued 43% 0% Q18. In the past year, have you referred other customers to your bank? Yes shown. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 20% 40% 60% Percent of consumers 80% June 2015, n= varies; 28 - 272. Base: Consumers who received replacement debit card in past 2 years, by segment. © 2015 GA Javelin Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 18 CONCLUSION The case for instant issuance of cards has traditionally focused purely in the monetary increase in interchange revenue from the user being in possession of the card a few days longer in the first month. Although this is still a core reason for providing instant issuance to cardholders, both FI executives and cardholders tout the equally-significant benefits of improved customer satisfaction, retention, and word-of-mouth recommendation. Today’s consumers expect real-time delivery of goods and services, and instant issuance meets these demands and can provide significant and measurable improvement in brand reputation compared to financial institutions that are not delivering this capability. Cardholders who received their debit cards through instant issuance have a quantifiably more favorable impression of their primary financial institution than cardholders who received centrally issued cards several days later in the mail. 10 Javelin interview with industry executives, August 2015. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 19 METHODOLOGY The consumer data in this report is based on information collected from a Javelin survey that targeted populations representative of the overall U.S. population in proportions of gender, age, and income in June 2015: 150 cardholders who had received an instant issuance debit card within the past 24 months. 150 cardholders who had received a central issuance debit card within the past 24 months. Further research was conducted through in-depth phone interviews with financial institutions, card networks, and financial technology vendors. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy 20 ABOUT JAVELIN JAVELIN, a Greenwich Associates LLC company, provides strategic insights into customer transactions, increasing sustainable profits and creating efficiencies for financial institutions, government agencies, payments companies, merchants, and other technology providers. JAVELIN’s independent insights result from a uniquely rigorous three-dimensional research process that assesses customers, providers, and the transactions ecosystem. Authors: Nick Holland, Head of Mobile Sarah Miller, Senior Analyst – Custom Research & Operations ABOUT ENTRUST DATACARD Consumers, citizens and employees increasingly expect anywhere-anytime experiences — whether they are making purchases, crossing borders, accessing egov services or logging onto corporate networks. Entrust Datacard offers the trusted identity and secure transaction technologies that make those experiences reliable and secure. Solutions range from the physical world of financial cards, passports and ID cards to the digital realm of authentication, certificates and secure communications. With more than 2,000 Entrust Datacard colleagues around the world, and a network of strong global partners, the company serves customers in 150 countries worldwide. For more information, visit www.entrustdatacard.com. © 2015 GA Javelin LLC is a Greenwich Associates LLC company. All rights reserved. No portion of these materials may be copied, reproduced, distributed or transmitted, electronically or otherwise, to external parties or publicly without the permission of Greenwich Associates, LLC. GA Javelin may also have rights in certain other marks used in these materials. javelinstrategy.com 925.225.9100 Instant-Issuance Payment Cards: Fulfilling Consumer Expectations for Immediacy
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz