ӀϡਔЍڼᒚᓚొ ę 8 ּέ៉གྷរ ę เᚹϲ ၐࡿӀ Ղ̀ࢆ ߸Ԉඡ هࡔطܜᗁੰ ϩቲࡊ Facial Freckles Treated by Intense Pulsed Light — The Experience of 8 Cases in Taiwan — Yau- Li Huang Yuan-Li Liao Shih-Hung Lee Hong-Shang Hong Freckles or ephelides are cutaneous pigmented lesions that have familial inheritance, increase degree of pigmentation by sun-exposure, and frequently seen on face and other sun-exposure areas. Freckles (ephelides) have been reported to respond completely and quickly to the Q-switched 532nm Nd:YAG, alexandrite or ruby lasers. The skin types of Asian patients are above type III, and mostly are type IV or V. The most important consideration for laser therapy on Asian skin is post-therapy hypo-pigmentation or post-inflammatory hyper-pigmentation. We try to treat facial freckles of Asian patients with intense pulsed light and with the following parameters: cut -off filters of 550 -590nm, fluences of 25-35 J / cm2 , single pulse, and pulse width of 4.0 msec. The response results are evaluated by dermatologist, patients themselves, color photography, ultraviolet detect camera and ultraviolet photography. The results reveal: in clinical evaluation, about 75% patients had "excellent" or "good" results. About 87.5% patients had "Extremely" or "very" satisfied in patient-self evaluation. In conclusion, facial freckles of Asian skin treated with intense pulsed light is a quick, safe, satisfied, and effective method with little side effects. (Dermatol Sinica 21 : 58-67, 2003) Key words: Intense pulsed light, Freckles, Asian skin, Skin type, Post - therapy hypo - pigmentation, Post-inflammatory hyper-pigmentation Ăߏ˘ᓚ˯૱֍۞Ғ৵Ăѣछ็ّĂᗞҒົᐌ͟ខ҃ΐࢦĂͷр൴д͟ Ѝᘉខ۞ొҜĄӀϡ Q ฟᙯ ܜگ532nm ۞⊺ฮЧडăჴϜडăٕࡓᚗϮड̏གྷਕ ԆБă҃ͷԣిгڼᒚĄֲ߷ˠ۞ϩቲᙷݭкΗߏௐˬ˯ͽݭĂͽௐαặࠎݭ кĄडᙯڼ۞ࢬ͞˘ٺᒚ̂۞҂ณĂಶߏఙޢҒ৵۞ត̼ĂӈఙޢҒ৵εăٕۆ াޢҒ৵Ք۞ன෪Ąԧࣇဘྏͽ ܜگ550 Ҍ 590nm ۞࿅ᕭጡĂਕณ ޘ25 Ҍ 35 J / cm2 Ă ಏ˘ਔĂਔᆵ 4.0 msec ۞ਔЍڼᒚֲ߷ˠᓚ˯۞ć֭ӀϡᓜԖϩቲࡊᗁरăঽˠ ҋ֗႕ຍޘă૾ҒͯăโϨͯăγЍઍീ࠹፟ᄃͯĂֽෞҤਔЍڼᒚ۞ From the Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Accepted for publication: July, 22, 2002 Reprint requests: Yau-Li Huang, M.D., Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199,Tun-Hwa North Road, Taipei, Taiwan. TEL: 02-27135211 ext. 3397 FAX: 02-27191623 58 เᚹϲ ᓜԖड़ڍĄඕڍពϯĂᓜԖ۞ෞҤѣ 75 % ۞ঽˠ྿מ " ז " " ։р " ۞Լචޘć҃ঽˠ ҋ֗۞ෞҤĂঽˠ႕ຍޘдޝ႕ຍͽ˯ࡗҫ 87.5 %ĄඕኢߏĂਔЍ̙εࠎ˘ԣిăщ Бăઘүϡ͌ă႕ຍ˫ޘѣड़۞͞ёĂϡֽڼᒚֲ߷ˠᓚ˯Ą( ̚රϩᄫ 21 : 58 - 67, 2003 ) ᒚܑϩҒ৵ঽիॡĂΞ྿ ז8 % 7Ąώࡊд ݈ ֏ ( Freckles or ephelides )Ăߏ˘ᓚ Ӏϡ Q ฟᙯ ܜگ532nm ۞⊺ฮЧड̈́ Q ˯૱֍۞Ғ৵Ă̂̈ࡗ 1 ~ 2 mm Ӕነ ฟᙯࡓᚗϮडڼᒚ۞གྷរ˯Ăᄃ઼ ҒĂᗞҒົᐌ͟ខ҃ΐࢦĂͷр൴д͟Ѝ γ۞ಡӘᙷҬ 6, 8Ăӈֹֹϡ۞ਕณ࠹ޘ ᘉខొҜĄϩቲҒăࡓጀăᖡீ۞ཏ ၆ྵڼᒚ۞โࠎҲĂ̪ົѣܑϩ ྵࠎр൴Ąѣछ็ّĂវߖҒវពّ ۞๋च ( ᖐࢳᕯăᕇېҕ̈́ )Ăͷ ็ ( autosomal dominant inheritance ) ߏΞ ূ൭۞⊺ڶېฮЧड˫ྵࡓᚗϮडࠎ ਕ۞็ሀё Ąᖐঽநጯ۞ត̼ߏܑ ᆖच ( ঽˠົࢋՐϡԊొ౫ዕᘽ )Ąͽ˯ˬ ϩโҒ৵۞ᆧΐ ( melanosis )Ă҃ܧโҒ৵ Q ฟᙯҒ৵डրЍᕇ̂̈ ( spot ࡪ۞ᆧΐ ( melanocytosis ) 2Ą఼૱дᇆᜩ size ) ఼૱ྵ̈ ( ᄃਔЍ۞ filter ͧྵ )Ă҃ ࡚टγ៍۞ଐ̖˭̝ڶᅮࢋ᎕ໂڼᒚĄ็ тڍ۞ᇴϫкă̶Ҷቑಛ̂Ăڼᒚ˯ ۞͞ёΒ߁ۏநّ̼̈́ጯّೱቲăᄏ ૱૱ົਈॡ˧ĄЯࠎ˯ Q ฟᙯҒ৵ ჼăّ̈́֨۞֨ខඈඈĄܕѐֽĂϤٺ डր۞˘ֱڼᒚ˯۞ઘүϡયᗟĂԧ डᗁጯ۞ซՎĂӀϡ Q ฟᙯ (Q - switched) ࣇဘྏӀϡਔЍֽڼᒚֲ߷ˠᓚ˯۞ ܜ گ5 3 2 n m ۞ ⊺ ฮ Ч ड ( N d : YA G Ą 1 laser )ăჴϜड ( Alexandrite laser )ăٕ ਔЍ ( intense pulsed lightĂIPL ) ߏ˘ ࡓᚗϮड ( ruby laser ) ̏གྷਕԆБͷԣి ߱ૻ۞ܜگЍĂܜگቑಛརд 500 - 1200nm гڼᒚ 3, 4, 5Ą҃Ăͽ˯˘ֱ Q ฟᙯ ̝มĂͷ֭ܧಏ˘۞ܜگडЍćᔵι Ғ৵डրϡڼٺᒚҘ͞ˠ۞ᇃཌྷ۞โ ѣ˘ֱኑᗔ۞ણᇴ ( тĂਔᆵăਔมؼ ( Β߁ܑϩٕߏৌϩᆸ۞โҒ৵ঽիĂּ ᏵॡมăਕณޘăЍᕇ̂̈ඈඈ ) ᅮࢋአ тខăă͉ϣͩϓăܦוăโ ༼Ăҭߏүϡࣧநᄃड࠹ҬĄιΞͽ ൮ඈඈ )ĂӮ̏གྷѣҒ৵Ҳ˭ ( ͍ ߏQ ฟ ᑕϡдੵͨ 9ăҕგঽի۞ڼᒚ 10, 11ăਔЍ ᙯࡓᚗϮჴϜड )ăᖐࢳᕯ ( ͍ аߋఙ ( photorejuvenation ) 12, 13ăֱ˘โҒ ߏ Q ฟᙯ⊺ฮЧड )ăᇶॡّܑϩᒺă ৵ঽի۞ڼᒚ 14, 15 ඈඈк͞ࢬ۞়ঽĄ҃ ᇶॡّቲኳԼតăᕇېҕ̈́ඈઘ ͞ࢬ۞ڼᒚ˵ѣಡӘ࿅ 15Ą үϡ۞ಡӘ 6Ą၆ٺቲҒྵஎ۞ֲ߷ˠЯࠎ ڼᒚ˘ܑϩ۞โҒ৵Ă ܑϩѣྵ۞ melaninĂٙͽڼᒚ۞ޢҒ৵ ᇾ۞ۏăٕჍࠎҒૄኳ ( chromophore ) ߏโ 6 Ҳ˭۞ଐځྵົڶព Ą൴ޢۆҒ৵Ք۞ Ғ৵̈វ ( melanosome ) ٕߏโҒ৵ ઘүϡ۞ּͧдቲҒஎ۞ˠ˵ྵĂ͍ ( melanin )Ąࢋ྿ז։р۞ᏴፄّЍሤ̶ྋ ߏϡ Q ฟᙯ ܜگ532nm ۞⊺ฮЧडڼ ( selective photothermolysis ) ᇾ۞โҒ৵̈ 59 ӀϡਔЍڼᒚᓚొ វĂᏴϡटٽӛќ۞ܜگቑಛߏ 351 Ҍ 1064nm 16, 17, 18, 19Ą҃ਔᆵ۞Ᏼፄߏֶፂโ Ғ৵̈វ۞ሤቤྋॡม ( thermal relaxation time, TRT ) ࡗ 250 Ҍ 1000 nsecĂٙͽਔᆵ ᑕྍࢋ̈ ٺ1000 nsec ̖ਕ᎕྿זٙᅮሤ ณͽၨ໑ᇾ۞ۏĂ̙҃ᗼಛᖐ 20ĄQ ฟᙯ۞ ܜگ532nm ⊺ฮЧडăჴϜ डăٕࡓᚗϮड ( Q - switched ruby laser ) ̏གྷਕԆБͷԣిгڼᒚĂ҃ Q ฟᙯ րٙ፬൴۞ൺਔ ( ୮ѼቑಛĂ nanosecond range ) ˵Ξͽдઘүϡໂ̈۞ ଐ˭̝ڶᗼܑஎᆸ۞โҒ৵ঽիĄ ҃Ăԧࣇ೩Ӏϡᆵܜگᙉր۞ਔ ЍĂֽԣి˫ѣड़۞ڼᒚֲ߷ˠᓚొ۞ Ą അགྷ៍၅זӀϡ ܜگ515nm ࿅ᕭጡ ( filter ) ۞ਔЍڼᒚᆸโҒ৵ঽի۞ј Fig. 1 A Intense pulsed light equipment ( Photoderm, ESC medical systems Ltd., Yokneam, Israel). B Keep the filter parallel to the skin to avoid uneven treatment. C Ultraviolet detect camera and standard film. The photography was taken on a fix - staged table with standard film with and without the use of the UV filter. Α९ּ 20Ăͽ̈́Ӏϡ ܜگ590nm ۞࿅ᕭጡă ਕณ ޘ34 J / cm 2 ۞ਔЍڼᒚᙷҬঽի ۞ѣड़ಡӘ 15ĂӀϡ ܜگ550nm ٕ 570nm ۞࿅ᕭጡăਕณ ޘ28 ז32 J / cm 2ăؼᏵ ॡม 20.0 / 40.0 msec ۞ਔЍઇаߋఙ҃โ Ғ৵ঽիពԼච۞͛ᚥ 12, 13Ă҃ͷઘү ϡӮໂ͌Ąٙͽώ͛۞ϫ۞ߏӀϡᓜԖᗁ रăঽˠҋ֗႕ຍޘă૾ҒͯăโϨ ͯăγЍઍീ࠹፟ᄃͯ ( Ultraviolet detect camera and UV photography ) т ࡁտĂѐ᛬ 26 Ҍ 60 ໐ ( πӮ 38.4 ໐ )Ăϩቲ ᙷ ( ݭskin phototypes, Fitzpatrick scale ) ࠎௐ ˬăௐα ( ݭௐˬݭĈ2 ҜĂௐαݭĈ6 Ҝ ) ତצਔЍ۞ڼᒚĄБొ۞ঽଈੵ˞˘ਠ ֨ខϡ̝ݡγĂд˘ѐֹ̰֭ϡੜ۞ γϡᘽۏăٕߏତצड۞ڼᒚĄπ Ӯତ צ1.75 Ѩ ( ˘ѨĈ3 ҜĂ˟ѨĈ4 ҜĂ ˬѨĈ1 Ҝ ) ۞ਔЍڼᒚĂՏѨม 4 ฉĂВ៍၅̱࣎͡Ą ( Fig.1C )ĂֽෞҤਔЍڼᒚ۞ᓜԖड़ ڍĄ̚γЍઍീ࠹፟ѣ˘࣎পҾ ۞γЍ࿅ᕭጡ ( UV filter )ĂΞͽֹโҒ৵ ۞ঽիΐૻពညĂֹԧࣇΞͽՀटٽăՀ ៍މăᇾ̼гͧྵෞҤᓜԖ۞ड़ ڍ21Ą Մफ़ᄃ͞ڱ Śঽ ଈ ˣҜᓜԖ෧ᕝࠎ۞ّ̃ঽଈৼˢ Ś ڼᒚᆇጡ ਔЍ፟ጡ ( ESC Sharplan medical systems Ltd., Yokneam, Israel ) т ( Fig. 1A ),Ξͽ யϠᆵܜگቑಛ 500 Ҍ 1200nmăܧТՎ̼ ( noncoherent ) ۞ЍĄ҃˘ֱЍົ఼࿅প Ҿనࢍ۞࿅ᕭጡ ( filters )Ăপ۞ܜگؠЍົ జᕭଫĂ౺˭ѩ˯ͽܜگҌ 1200nm ۞Ѝజ 60 เᚹϲ ፬൴ֽĄপ۞ܜگؠ࿅ᕭጡΒ߁Ĉ515ă ( graying )ăٕតஎ ( darkening )Ăڼܑ 550ă570ă590ă615ă645ă695ă715ăٕ ᒚ·̶ٕඕՁڼᒚ۞ᇾ ( end point )Ąٙ 755nmĄѣ̙̂̈Тଣᐝ ( probes ) ΞֻՀ ѣঽଈఙ݈ࢋ߾ᓚĂҭ̙υܑϩ౫ዕ ೱĄҽቱ ( chilled gel ) ಶߏࢰگֹٙ Ąፆүॡมࡗ 10 ̶ᛗĄఙ̙ޢυฟϲ˾ ϡăҒ۞֤˘Ą ͤڇ൭ᘽٕγϡԩϠ৵ĂΪᅮᑡ˘ֱܲᒅ ֨ខ ( SPF ̂ ٺ15 ) ۞֯ᔶĄٙѣ۞ঽˠ ӮజӘۢͷٮࡔᐂĄ Ś ڼᒚ ԧࣇ۞ڼᒚॲߏፂͽ۞ـಡӘ 12. 13, 15, 20 ĂᏴፄ ܜگ550 Ҍ 590nm ( ͽ 570nm ࠎ Ś ෞҤ͞ё ) ۞࿅ᕭጡĂਕณ ޘ25 Ҍ 35 J / cm Ă ঽˠՏ 2 ฉа෧ෞҤ֭˭ఙ݈ఙ ಏ˘ਔĂਔᆵ 4.0 msec ۞ਔЍĄ ૾ޢҒăโϨăγЍͯ ( UV photo )Ă ࣎ቑಛ۞ ܜگ550 Ҍ 590nm ၆۞ܑٺโҒ Вᖸ 12 ฉĂˬ࣎͡ޢՏ͡аֽኑ෧ĂВ ৵ѣྵр۞Լචड़ڍĄЍᕇ̂̈ॲፂঽ ៍၅ 6 ࣎͡ĄՏѨ࠹ࡔᐂĂӮϡ࠹Т۞ຳ ˠঽի۞̶̂̈ҶҜཉֽᏴፄĂѣˬ ٗăЍă࠹፟ ( ˘ਠ࠹፟γЍઍീ࠹ ̂ ̈ Ξ ֻ Ᏼ ፄ Ĉ 8mm X 8mmĂ 8mm X ፟ĂUV detect camera, Faraghan Studio, 15mmĂ8mm X 35mmĄҽቱдՏ˘Ѩᑝ Philadelphia, PA ) ( Fig. 1C )ă۞ؠᗓ ൴݈ࢋд࿅ᕭጡ˯Ą࿅ᕭጡᄃϩቲ ̝˭ซҖĄдֹϡγЍઍീ࠹፟ٮ ҽቱͽࡗ 2mm ࠹ତᛈĂᔖҺۡତତᛈౄ ॡĂߏϡᇾ۞ ( ͯغstandard film, 400 ј፵լĄ࿅ᕭጡᄃϩቲܑࢬܲͪπࢬ˵ ASA Tri - X film )ăдؠᗓ۞ॸߛ˯ٮ ࢋࢦޝĂтѩ˘ֽϩቲତ۞צਕณ̖ਕπ ᛷֹϡγЍ࿅ᕭጡٕߏ՟ѣֹϡ࿅ᕭጡ ӮĂт ( Fig. 1B )Ą༊ϩቲӔனࡓཚ ( erythe- ۞ͯĄѣֹϡγЍ࿅ᕭጡ۞ͯĂߏ ma around lesions )ăҒ৵ӔனѷҒត̼ โҒ৵ঽիពညΐૻ۞ͯ ( UV photo )ć 2 Fig. 2 A and C, regular and UV photographs of patient 6 were taken before IPL intervention. B and D, Facial freckles improve a lot after IPL treatment at 4th week and show more apparent improvement on UV photo. Parameters of IPL: filter: 570nm, fluence: 26 J / cm2, pulse duration: 4.0 msec, single pulse. 61 ӀϡਔЍڼᒚᓚొ ҃՟ѣֹϡ࿅ᕭጡ۞ͯĂಶтТ˘ਠ۞ ( ᅅă̚ăࢦ )Ąଈ۰۞ତצޘĂ̶Ξତ โϨͯ ( regular photo ) ( Fig. 2 )Ą ( צacceptable ) ̙Ξତ ( צnon - acceptable ) ᗁरෞҤ͞ࢬĂϤҜᗁरॲፂᓜԖ ܑனֽͯෞҤซՎޘѺ̶ͧĄঽ ৺Ąଈ۰дఙޢෞҤഇมĂੵ˞֨ខݡ ̝γĂ̙ΞϡᏋயݡĄ ˠ۞ͅᑕᕩᙷמٺड़ ( ڍExcellent result ę ӈԼච ٺ̂ޘ75 % )Ă։рड़ ( ڍGood ඕ ڍ result ę ӈԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ҃̈ٺ ඕڍт ( Table I and II )Ăдௐ˟ฉॡѣ 75 % )Ă఼ड़ ( ڍFair result ę ӈԼචޘ 6 Ҝঽˠ ( 75 % ) ྿מזड़ڍĂ2 Ҝঽˠ ̂ ٺ25 % ҃̈ ٺ50 % )Ă̙։ड़ ( ڍPoor ( 25 % ) ྿ז։рड़ڍĄдௐαฉॡѣ 2 Ҝঽ result ę ӈԼච ٺ̈ޘ25 % ) ඈα৺Ą ˠ ( 25 % ) ྿מזड़ڍĂ4 Ҝঽˠ ( 50 % ) ঽˠҋ֗۞ຏצෞҤߏӀϡય͞۞ס ྿ז։рड़ڍĂ2 Ҝঽˠ ( 25 % ) ྿ז఼ड़ ёĂͽࢬ͞ޘໂ႕ຍ ( Extremely satis- ڍĄдௐˣฉॡѣ 3 Ҝঽˠ ( 37.5 % ) ྿מז fied )Ă ޝ႕ ຍ ( very satisfied )Ă ႕ ຍ ड़ڍĂ3 Ҝঽˠ ( 37.5 % ) ྿ז։рड़ڍĂ ( Satisfied )Ă႕ຍ ( Slightly satisfied )Ă 2 Ҝঽˠ ( 25 % ) ྿ז఼ड़ڍĄдௐ˩˟ฉ ̙႕ຍ ( Not satisfied ) ඈ̣৺̶ֽҾĂдௐ ॡѣ 3 Ҝঽˠ ( 37.5 % ) ྿מזड़ڍĂ3 Ҝ ̱࣎͡ॡෞҤĄڼᒚ۞̙։ͅᑕෞҤ˵ߏ ঽˠ ( 37.5 % ) ྿ז։рड़ڍĂ2 Ҝঽˠ Ӏϡય͞סёĂෞҤఙ̚ఙূ۞ޢ൭ ( 25 % ) ྿ז఼ड़ڍĄдඕՁௐ˘Ѩڼᒚ ᜈॡมăࡓăҒ৵ள૱ ( Ғ৵ᆧΐٕҒ৵ ۞ௐ˩˟ฉĂԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯۞ҫ ࿅͌ )ăڼᒚโຳഇ ( Down time ) ۞ѣ̈́ ˞ 75 %ĄΪү˘ѨਔЍ۞ˬҜঽˠĂд ᜈॡมܜൺĄ֭ͷϤᗁरෞҤᚑࢦޘ ௐ˟ฉĂԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯۞ҫ˞ Table I. Eight patients with facial freckles treated with IPL case Age Skin No. 2nd 4th 6th 8th 10th 12th 6th Patient Side ( Y ) / Type of week week week week week week month Self Effects Sex Tx after Tx after Tx after Tx after Tx after Tx after Tx after Tx Evaluate 1. 26 / F III 1 A A A B B C C b 2. 29 / F IV 1 A B B B B B B b 3. 45 / F IV 1 B C C C C C C c 4. 52 / F IV 2 A B# A A A A A b 5. 60 / F IV 2 A B# A A A A A b 6. 32 / F IV 2 A B# A A A A A a 7. 35 / F IV 2 B A# A B B B B a Hypopigm 8. 28 / F III 3 A C A C* A B B F, female. M, male. A: Excellent, 76-100%. B: Good, 51-75%. C: Fair, 26-50%. D: Poor, 0-25% a : Extremely satisfied. b: Very satisfied. c: Satisfied. d: Slightly satisfied. e: Not satisfied. # : Evaluating before the second treatment, which was performed at the 4th week. * : Evaluating before the third treatment, which was performed at the 8th week. b -entation - 62 เᚹϲ 100 %Ą˞זௐαฉᔵԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯۞̪ҫ˞ 100 %Ăҭߏ྿מזड़۞ڍ Ѻ̶ͧ̏གྷϤ 66.7 % ࢫ ז33.3 %ĄௐˣฉԼ ච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯۞ࢫ ˞ז66.7 %Ă҃ ௐ˩˟ฉԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯۞ࢫҌ 33.3 %ĄΩ˘дௐαฉତצௐ˟ѨਔЍ ڼᒚ۞ঽˠĂдௐ˟ฉĂԼචٺ̂ޘ 50 % ͽ˯۞ĂᄃΪү˘Ѩ۞ͧྵ˵ҫ˞ 100 %Ą˞זௐαฉĂࢋүௐ˟ѨਔЍ̝ ݈ĂᔵԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯۞̪ҫ˞ 100 %Ăҭߏ྿מזड़۞ڍѺ̶ͧ˵ߏϤ 75 % ࢫ ז25 %ĄдઇԆௐ˟ѨޢαฉĂ˵ ಶߏ៍၅۞ௐˣฉĂԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ۞ ̪ߏ 100 %Ă ̚3 Ҝঽˠ ( 75 % ) ྿מז ड़ڍĂ1 Ҝঽˠ ( 25 % ) ྿ז։рड़ڍĄ҃ ᇹ۞Լචଐ៍זܲۡ˘ڶ၅ഇ۞ௐ 6 ࣎ ͡ĄᓁវֽᄲĂᓜԖ۞៍၅ᄃෞҤΞͽ൴ னזĂڼᒚฉॡ۞ᓜԖͅᑕрĂӈ " מ " " ։р " Լච ( ޘԼච ٺ̂ޘ50 % ͽ˯ )Ăдڼᒚ˘Ѩ˟Ѩ۞Ӯࠎ Fig. 3 Clinical evaluation by dermatologists at the 6th month. X-axis is the clinical results: A: Excellent, 76-100%. B: Good, 51-75%. C: Fair, 26-50%. D: 0 - 25 %.Y- axis is the percentage of the patient in each clinical result condition. " Treat twice " group had better clinical results than " treat once " group. About 75 % patients reach the clinical results of " excellent " and " good " results ( A + B ). About 100% patients treated by twice IPL reach the clinical results of "excellent" and "good" results. 100 % ( 8 / 8 )ćαฉٕ̂ࡗ˘࣎͡ॡĂᓜԖ ۞ԼචޘតमĂѩॡࡶГү˘ѨਔЍ ྃૻĂמ " " " ։р " Լච ( ޘޘ ঽˠҋ֗۞ຏצෞҤ۞ඕڍдௐ 6 ࣎͡ ྿ ז100 % ( 4 / 4 )Ă҃ჯԼචड़ڍΞ྿ז ॡĂт ( Fig. 4 )Ăໂ႕ຍ ( Extremely satis- 6 ࣎͡ĄᓜԖ۞ෞҤдௐ 6 ࣎͡ॡĂѣ 75 % fied ) ۞ҫ 25 %Ăޝ႕ຍ ( very satisfied ) ۞ҫ ͽ˯۞ঽˠ྿מ " ז " " ։р " Լචޘ 62.5 %Ă႕ຍ ( Satisfied ) ۞ҫ12.5 %ĄΪү ( Fig. 3 )Ą ˘ѨਔЍ۞Ăໂ႕ຍ ( Extremely satis- Table II. The percentage of patients in different response levels at different week of evaluation. 2nd week 4th week 6th week 8th week 10th week 12th week and 6th month No. of Tx 1 2 A 66.7% 75% B 33.3% 25% C 0 0 D 0 0 total 1 2 total 1 2 total 1 2 total 1 2 total 1 2 total 75% 33.3% 25% 25% 33.3% 100% 75% 0 75% 37.5% 0 75% 50% 0 75% 37.5% 25% 66.7% 75% 50% 33.3% 0 12.5% 66.7% 25% 37.5% 66.7% 25% 37.5% 33.3% 25% 37.5% 0 0 0 25% 33.3% 0 12.5% 33.7% 0 25% 33.3% 0 12.5% 66.7% 0 25% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A: Excellent, 76-100%. B: Good, 51-75%. C: Fair, 26-50%. D: Poor, 0-25% 63 ӀϡਔЍڼᒚᓚొ ܑϯᅅͷΞͽତצĂূ൭ᜈࡗ 1 ͇Ąఙ ̚۞ࡓӮࠎᇶॡّĂᓜԖෞҤӮࠎᅅ ޘĂࡗ 1 ͇ಶঐεĄҒ৵តளଐڶĂੵ˞ ௐ 7 Ҝঽˠдௐ˟ฉෞҤॡ൴னזҒ৵Ҳ˭ ۞ត̼Ăዶঽଈ֭ѩត̼Ą҃Ғ ৵Ҳ˭۞ត̼˵дௐ̱ฉෞҤॡঐεĄ֭ ঽˠயϠࠫஶ۞ঽիĄᓚ˯۞ඕৄĂࡗ 2.8 ͇ಶБొ௲ར˞Ą ኢ ۞ᖐঽநត̼Ăࢋ۞ಶߏܑ Fig. 4 Patients self-evaluation at the 6th month. X-axis is the satisfied results: a: Extremely satisfied. b: Very satisfied. c: Satisfied. d: Slightly satisfied. e: Not satisfied. Y-axis is the percentage of the patient in each satisfied result condition. "Treat twice" group had better satisfied results than "treat once" group. About 100% patients treated by twice IPL reach the level of " extremely satisfied " and " very satisfied " results that assessed by patients themselves. ϩ۞โҒ৵ᆧΐ 1, 2ĄࢋӀϡड۞Ᏼፄّ Ѝሤ̶ྋ۞ࣧநֽᗼܑϩ۞โҒ৵Ăಶ ࢋ҂ᇋזโҒ৵ٕโҒ৵̈វ۞ӛќܜگ Ѝᙉ ( 351 ~ 1064nm )ĂᏴፄዋ༊۞ड፟ ăዋ༊۞۞ܜگडăྻϡዋ༊۞ਕณ ޘਔᆵͽ྾ϫ۞ 16Ąॲፂͽࡁ۞ـ տಡӘĂӀϡ Q ฟᙯ۞ ܜگ532nm ۞⊺ฮ Ч ड ( Nd : YAG laser )ă ჴ Ϝ ड ( alexandrite laser )ăٕ Q ฟᙯࡓᚗϮड ( ruby laser ) ̏གྷਕԆБͷԣిгڼᒚ3, Ą҃ĂЯࠎ a ͽ˯ˬ Q ฟᙯҒ৵ّ fied ) ۞ҫ 0 %Ăޝ႕ຍ ( very satisfied ) ۞ҫ 4, 5 66.7 %Ă႕ຍ ( Satisfied ) ۞ҫ 33.3 %Ąү डրϡֽڼᒚֲ߷ቲҒྵஎ۞ܑϩҒ Ѩ۞Ăໂ႕ຍ ( Extremely satisfied ) ۞ҫ ৵ঽիĂٙயϠ۞ఙޢҒ৵۞ត̼Ăӈఙ 50 %Ăޝ႕ຍ ( very satisfied ) ۞ҫ 50 %Ąᓁ ޢҒ৵εăٕۆাޢҒ৵Ք۞፟ົྵ វֽᄲĂঽˠ႕ຍޘдޝ႕ຍͽ˯ࡗҫ 6, 7ć b Q ฟᙯ ܜگ532nm ۞⊺ฮЧड 87.5 % ( 7 / 8 )ĂүѨਔЍ۞႕ຍͧޘΪ ̈́ Q ฟᙯࡓᚗϮडڼᒚܑϩҒ৵ঽիົ ү˘Ѩ۞ĄΩγঽˠдௐ˟ฉॡĂೀͼ ѣܑϩ۞๋च ( ᖐࢳᕯăᕇېҕ̈́ Ѻ̶̝Ѻ۞ໂ႕ຍĂҭߏдௐαฉॡĂ႕ ) 6Ăͷূ൭۞⊺ڶېฮЧड˫ྵࡓᚗ ຍޘѣ˭Ąࡶֶڼᒚ݈۞ޢซՎޘ Ϯडࠎᆖच8ćc ͽ˯ˬ Q ฟᙯҒ৵ ႕ຍྵֽͧޘĂֶ Wilcoxon ᑭ ( ؠϓ डրЍᕇ̂̈ ( spot size ) ఼૱ྵ̈ ( ᄃ ᇴͷᇹώᇴ̈ ٺ30 ۞ᑭؠĂᙷҬ੨၆ t ᑭ ਔЍ۞ filter ͧྵ )Ă҃тڍ۞ᇴϫ ) ؠĂдௐ 6 ࣎͡ॡᗁरෞҤ͞ࢬ t = 2.546, кă̶Ҷቑಛ̂Ăڼᒚ˯૱૱ົਈॡ p < 0.05ć҃ঽଈҋ֗ຏ ̶ొצt = 10.043, ˧ĄЯࠎ˯ˬᕇ Q ฟᙯҒ৵डր۞ p < 0.005ĂӮѣࢍ˯۞ຍཌྷĄ ˘ֱڼᒚ˯۞ઘүϡયᗟĂԧࣇဘྏӀ ঽˠ၆ٺఙ̚۞ূ൭۞ҋᛇͅᑕĂӮ ϡਔЍֽڼᒚֲ߷ˠᓚ˯۞Ąਔ 64 เᚹϲ Ѝ( intense pulsed light ) ۞үϡࣧநᄃड Weiss ඈˠ៍၅זӀϡਔᆵ 2 - 4 msec ࠹ҬĂιΞͽᑕϡдੵͨ ăҕგঽի۞ڼ ۞ਔЍڼᒚᆸโҒ৵ঽի ( poikiloder- ᒚ 12, ma of Civatte ) 20ĂΩγ Moreno Arias ඈˠӀ ăֱ˘โҒ৵ঽի۞ڼᒚ 14, 15 ඈඈк͞ ϡਔᆵ 3.8 msec Ҍ 5 msec ̝ม۞ਔЍ ࢬ۞়ঽĂ҃͞ࢬ۞ڼᒚ˵ѣజಡӘ ڼᒚᆸโҒ৵ࡪᆧϠঽի 15Ą࣎ቑಛ ࿅ 15Ą ۞ਔᆵࣣрࠧ ٺepidermis TRT ( 3 -10 9 13 10, 11 ăਔЍаߋఙ ( photorejuvenation ) Weiss ඈˠ៍၅זӀϡ ܜگ515nm ࿅ᕭ msec ) ̝̰Ăܑϯሤਕхܑϩ̝̰ĂإϏ ጡ ( filter )ăਕณ ޘ20 - 24 J / cm2Ăͽಏ˘ ᕖҌܑϩ̝γ ( ҃ࠎܑϩ̰۞โҒ৵ ٕᗕਔᆵ 2 - 4 msec ۞ਔЍڼᒚᆸโ ঽի ) 15ĄԧࣇᏴϡ۞ parametersĂಶߏॲፂ Ғ৵ঽի ( poikiloderma of Civatte ) ۞јΑ ˘ֱಡӘ៍၅ĂᏴፄᙷҬ۞࿅ᕭጡگ ९ּ ĄΩγ Moreno Arias ඈˠӀϡܜگ ܜăਔᆵăਕณޘĂӈֹдਔᆵ۞ 590nm ۞࿅ᕭጡăਕณ ޘ34 J / cm2ăͽᗕ Ᏼፄ˯࿁ࡦ˞ selective photothermolysis ۞ ਔᆵ 3.8 msec Ҍ 5 msecăؼᏵॡม20 நኢ ( ӈਔᆵ̂ ٺmelanosome ۞ TRT )Ă msec ۞ਔЍĂ੫၆ᆸโҒ৵ࡪᆧϠ ҭߏඕڍᄃ઼γ۞ಡӘᙷҬĂ֭ౄ ঽիĂมαฉڼᒚ˟Ѩ۞ಡӘĄ̚ѣ јᚑࢦ۞ઘүϡĄ 20 ˬҜঽଈߏ۞ঽଈĂڼᒚඕڍӮ྿ ΩγॲፂᓜԖ۞៍၅ಡӘ۞ඕڍĂ ז76 % Ҍ 100 % ۞ੵத ( clearance ) Ąਔ ԧࣇ൴னڼזᒚฉॡ۞ᓜԖͅᑕрĂ ЍϡֽүЍаߋఙ ( photorejuvenation )Ă ӈ " מ " " ։р " Լච ( ޘԼච̂ޘ ܕѐֽѣ̙͌͛ᚥಡӘ࿅ Ą˘̚ቔ೩ ٺ50 % ͽ˯ )Ăдڼᒚ˘Ѩ˟Ѩ۞Ӯ זĂӀϡ ܜگ550nm ٕ 570nm ۞࿅ᕭጡă ࠎ 100 % ( 8 / 8 )ćαฉٕ̂ࡗ˘࣎͡ॡĂᓜ ਕ ณ ޘ28 ז32 J / cm ă ؼᏵ ॡ ม Ԗ۞ԼචޘតमĂѩॡࡶГү˘Ѩਔ 20.0 / 40.0 msec ۞ਔЍĂ੫၆ֲ߷ˠ۞ϩ ЍྃૻĂמ " " " ։р " Լචޘ྿ז ቲઇЍаߋఙ҃โҒ৵ঽիពԼච۞ඕ 100 % ( 4 / 4 )Ă҃ჯԼචड़ڍΞ྿̱࣎ז ڍ12ĄඕڍពϯĂд 97 Ҝତڼצᒚ۞ঽ ͡ĄҬͼдฉνΠঽˠಶ྿ޝזр۞ड़ ଈĂᓜԖᄃঽˠҋ֗۞ෞҤѣ 90 % ͽ˯۞ " ( ڍTable II )Ăҭߏдఙޢαฉٕࡗ˘࣎͡ מ " " ։р " Լචड़ڍĄॲፂ˘ֱಡ ۞ॡ࣏ѣೇ൴ᅅ۞ГโҒ৵̼ٕͅโ ӘĂԧࣇనࢍ۞ࡁտߏ੫၆ֲ߷ˠ۞ϩ ( repigmentation ) ۞ன෪ĂҭߏགྷϤௐ˟Ѩ ቲĂϩቲᙷݭௐˬҌ̣۞ݭঽˠĂϡਔ ۞ਔЍڼᒚĂԼචड़ڍ႕ຍޘӮ೩ Ѝֽڼᒚᓚ˯۞ঽիĄԧࣇᏴፄگ ֭Ξͽჯ̱࣎͡νΠĄѨਔЍڼ ܜ550 Ҍ 590nm ۞࿅ᕭጡĂਕณ ޘ25 Ҍ ᒚ۞ड़˘ྵڍѨڼᒚ۞ड़ڍрĂ҃ͷჯ 35 J / cm Ăಏ˘ਔĂਔᆵ 4.0 msec ۞ਔ ۞ॡม˵ྵ˳ ( Fig. 3 & 4 )Ąலౣߏ˘ ЍֽڼᒚĄॲፂԧࣇ۞ඕڍĂᓜԖ۞ෞ छ็ّăᄃ͟Ѝᘉខѣᙯ۞ϩቲ Ҥѣ 75 % ͽ˯۞ঽˠ྿מ " ז " " ։р " ঽĂఙ֨۞ޢខନ߉ેҖ۞ᚑॾᄃӎĂᄃ Լච ( ޘFig. 3 )ć҃ঽˠҋ֗۞ෞҤĂঽ ೇ൴۞ԣၙᚑࢦޘѣ̷࠹ᙯĄ 15 12, 13 2 2 ˠ႕ຍޘдޝ႕ຍͽ˯ࡗҫ 87.5 %Ą ᇹ۞ඕ઼ڍγ۞ಡӘޝତܕĄ 65 ӀϡਔЍڼᒚֲ߷ˠโҒ৵۞Ω ˘࣎૱֍۞યᗟĂಶߏఙޢҒ৵۞ត̼Ă ӀϡਔЍڼᒚᓚొ ӈఙޢҒ৵ε ( post - therapy hypo-pigmen- 35 J / cm2 Ăಏ˘ਔĂਔᆵ 4.0 msec ۞ਔ tation )ăٕۆাޢҒ৵Ք ( post - inflamma- ЍֽڼᒚĂߊщБ˫ѣड़ĄЯࠎఙ݈̙ tory hyperpigmentation ) ۞ன෪ Ą˘ਠड ᅮࢋܑࢬ౫ዕăఙޭޢೇԣăઘүϡ͌ă ۞ڼᒚĂۆাޢҒ৵Ք૱൴Ϡдϩቲ ड़ڍன۞ѝă˫ѣྵ̂۞Ѝᕇ̂̈ ( spot ௐˬٕα ( ݭskin phototypes III or IV ) ͽ size ) ΞՀೱ̙Т̂̈۞࿅ᕭጡଣᐝĂٙ ˯ă̈́ខ๋۞ঽˠ Ąॲፂԧࣇ۞ࡁտĂҒ ͽΞͽྵԣăྵѣड़த۞ڼᒚ̂ቑಛ۞ ৵តளଐڶĂੵ˞ௐˣҜঽˠдௐ˟ฉෞ Ą҃Тᇹቑಛ۞ਕณޘăТᇹ۞ܜگ Ҥॡ൴னזҒ৵Ҳ˭۞ត̼Ăዶঽଈ֭ ࿅ᕭጡăତܕቑಛ۞ਔᆵ˵Ξͽ༊ү ѩត̼Ą҃Ғ৵Ҳ˭۞ត̼˵дௐ Ѝаߋఙֽڼᒚćдڼᒚ۞ТॡĂ˵ ̱ฉෞҤॡঐεĄ͛۞ᚥಡӘ˵ព Ξͽ྿זԼච৳ăҕგᕖૺăϩቲ ϯĂдϡਔЍүЍаߋఙ۞ 97 Ҝֲ߷ঽ πޘă͉ͨ͋̂ඈаߋ۞ड़ ڍ12, 13Ąٙͽ ˠ۞ಡӘҘͰ۞ 3 ҜϡਔЍڼᒚ ඕኢߏĂਔЍ̙εࠎ˘ԣిăщБă ۞ঽˠ̚Ă֭៍၅זҒ৵តள۞ઘүϡ 13, ઘүϡ͌ă႕ຍ˫ޘѣड़۞͞ёĂϡֽ ĄΩγఙ̚ূ൭ăఙޢᇶॡّࡓăఙޢ ڼᒚֲ߷ˠᓚ˯Ą҃ᄃΝੵโ ຏߖăࠫஶĂдԧࣇ۞࣎९̚˵֭՟ѣ ۞डͧྵĂغזᐹКĂ̪ᅮࢋซ˘ ൴னĄ҃ঽˠତڼצᒚޢĂඕৄҌԆБ௲ Վ۞ᓜԖᐌ፟၆۞၁រֽᙋځĄ 22 25 15 རࡗ 2 Ҍ 3 ͇Ăఙޭ۞ޢೇͧྵԣĄᔵ֭ ՟ѣͧྵ۞ࡁտ͛ᚥಡӘĂಶᓜԖ۞៍ ၅Ăͧ˘ਠडڼᒚโҒ৵۞ઘүϡ ͌ădown time ྵൺăޭೇԣăͷঽଈତצ ָޘĄ˘ਠडᄃਔЍ۞मҾĂࢋ۞ ಶߏ۞ܜگԛёĂಏ˘ܜگᄃᆵܜگᙉր ( broad spectrum )Ą҃โҒ৵̈វٕโҒ৵ ၆ٺಏ˘˘ ( ܜگਠड ) ٕᆵܜگᙉր ( ਔЍ ) ۞ӛќߏޘӎ̙ТĂౄјᏴፄ ّЍሤ̶ྋड़ᑕ۞̙Т˵̙ቁؠĂ͛ᚥ˯ ˵՟ѣ͞ࢬ۞ଣćҭಶԧࣇ۞ࡁտ ᓜԖ៍၅҃֏ĂԧࣇဘྏΝଯീĂҬͼਔ Ѝѣྵр۞โҒ৵ਕณӛќĂ҃ͷᏴፄ ّЍሤ̶ྋड़ᑕྵрĂٙͽౄјঐε ԣădown time ൺăޭೇԣăͷઘүϡྵ ͌Ąቁ۞ؠ፟ᖼᄃநኢૄᖂ̪ޞซ˘Վ۞ ࡁտĄ ፋវֽᄲĂਔЍϡֽڼᒚֲ߷ˠĂ ϩቲᙷݭௐˬăαặ۞ݭĂᏴፄگ ܜ550 Ҍ 590nm ۞࿅ᕭጡĂਕณ ޘ25 Ҍ References 1. Brues AM: Linkage of body build with sex, eye colour and freckling. Am J Hum Genet 2: 215-239, 1950. 2. Breathnach AS: Electron microscopy of melanocytes and melanosomes in freckled human epidermis. J Ivest Dermatol 42: 389-394, 1964. 3. Spicer MS, Goldberg DJ: Lasers in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 34: 1-25, 1996. 4. Taylor CR, Anderson RR: Treatment of benign pigmented epidermal lesions by Qswitched ruby laser. Int J Dermatol 32: 908-912, 1993. 5. Acland KM, Barlow RJ: Lasers for the dermatologist. Br J Dermatol 143: 244-255, 2000. 6. Nanni C: Complications of laser surgery. 66 เᚹϲ Dermatol clin 15: 521-534, 1997. 7. Klimer S, Wheeland R, Goldberg D, et al.: pulsed light source. Dermatol Surg 25: 254-255, 1999. Treatment of epidermal pigmented lesions 15. Moreno Arias GA, Ferrando J: Intense with the frequency-doubled Q-switched pulsed light for melanocytic lesions. Nd: YAG laser. Arch Dermatol 130: 1515- Dermatol Surg 27: 397-400, 2001. 1519, 1994. 16. Anderson RR, Parrish JA: Selective pho- 8. Tse Y, Levine V, McClain S, et al.: The tothermolysis: precise microsurgery by removal of cutaneous pigmented lesions selective absorption of pulsed radiation. with the Q-switched neodymium: yttrium- Science 220: 524-527, 1983. aluminum-garnet laser: A comparative 17. Margolis RJ, Dover JS, Polla LL, et al.: study. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 20: 795-800, Visible action spectrum for melanin-spe- 1994. cific selective photothermolysis. Lasers 9. Raulin C, Werner S, Hartschuh W, et al.: Effective treatment of hypertrichosis with 18. Sherwood KAA, Murray S, Kurban AK, et pulsed light: a report of two cases. Ann al.: Effect of wave-length on cutaneous Plast Surg 39: 169-173, 1997. pigment using pulsed irradiation. J invest 10. Schroeter CA, Neumann HA: An intense Dermatol 92: 717-720, 1989. light source. The Phhtoderm VL-flash- 19. Ara G, Anderson RR, Madel KG, et al.: lamp as a new treatment possibility for Irradiation of pigmented melanoma cells vascular skin lesions. Dermatol Surg 24: with high intensity pulse radiation gener- 743-748, 1998. ates acoustic waves and kills cells. Lasers 11. Goldman MP: Treatment fo benign vascu- Surg Med 10: 52-59, 1990. lar lesions with the Photoderm VL high- 20. Watanabe S, Flotte T, Margolis R, et al.: intensity pulsed light source. Adv The effects of pulse duration on the pig- Dermatol 13: 503-521,1997. mented cell injury by dye laser. J Invest 12. Bitter PH: Noninvasive rejuvenation of Dermatol 88: 523, 1987. photodamaged skin using serial, full-face 21. Garcia A, Fulton JE: The combination of intense pulsed light treatments. Dermatol glycolic acid and hydroquinone or kojic Surg 26: 835-843, 2000. acid for the treatment of melasma and 13. Negishi K, Tezuka Y, Kushikata N, et al.: Photorejuvenation for Asian skin by intense pulsed light. Dermatol Surg 27: 627-632, 2001. 14. Gold MH, Foster TD, Bell MW: Nevus spilus successfully treated with an intense 67 Surg Med 9: 389-397, 1989. related conditions. Dermatol Surg 22: 443447, 1996. 22. Stratigos AJ, Dover JS, Arndt KA: Laser treatment of pigmented lesions-2000: How far have we gone? Arch Dermatol 136: 915-921, 2000.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz