Overview of magnetic configuration properties of Wendelstein 7-X J. Geiger, C. D. Beidler, M. Drevlak, P. Helander, H. Maaßberg, Yu. Turkin Max-Planck-Institut for Plasma Physics, IPP-EURATOM Assoc., Greifswald, Germany Problem and task: ● steady-state divertor operation => vanishing bootstrap current ● high- nTτ => low neoclassical transport, full-field (B=2.5T) ● fast-particle confinement => high-β, full-field ● high-β at full-field => high-nTτ (good confinement) + stability Motivation Wendelstein 7-X optimized with respect to ● equilibrium & stability ● neoclassical transport & small bootstrap current ● α-particle confinement Excursion to leading Fourier-coef. of |B| (Boozer-coord.) in the configuration space of Wendelstein 7-X Neoclassical confinement (εeff) and minimization of bootstrap current in highmirror configuration demands a compromise. Wendelstein 7-X coil system and flux surface modular coils B 4 3 2 A 1 5 & planar coils φ=0° What can be gained by exploiting the flexibility of the coil system? ● Extend investigations of ε to iota- and position-variations. eff ● Investigate influence of toroidal mirror form on ε and Ibs . eff Variation of toroidal mirror form contour plot |B| (Boozer angles) narrow mirror field high-mirror configuration broad mirror field cent'd → only modular coils for mirror field, planar coils for iota in/out-sh → planar coils for positioning (affects also mirror field, readjusted with modular coils) ● range of variation limited and not independent ● for centered configurations b and b10/b11 show linear dependence 01 ● offsets for high-iota (larger b ) and low-iota (lower b01 ) 01 ● in/out-sh changes b with minor effect on b10/b11 (gray dashed line). 01 ● only for extreme mirror fields : nonlinear interaction of b & b11 can 01 compete with b10 and suppress dipole-part of the PS-currents φ=36° Configurations defined by 6 coil current ratios ik = Ik/I1, k=2,...,5,A,B; normalizing current I1. Reference configurations around the standard conf. show flexibility: ● toroidal mirror field ● rotational transform B (φ=0 °)−B(φ=36°) mirror-ratio mr= ● horiz. position B (φ=0 °)+B(φ=36°) ● magnetic shear Neoclassical transport D 1/ ν 11 3/ 2 eff ∝ ϵ ⋅T 7/ 2 2 2 /( n⋅R ⋅B ) εeff important for neoclassical confinement Previous results th (see J.Geiger et al, 35 EPS Conf. 2008, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece http://epsppd.epfl.ch/Hersonissos/pdf/P2_062.pdf ) ● ● viewed by figures of merit for collisionless trapped particles: Γv = bounce averaged GradB-drift velocity Γw = Γs·Γv2 ~ integral effect of square of GradB-drift => transport by trapped particles ( Γs – phase volume of trapped particles) narrow mirror Interchange stability degrades with higher mr / outward-shift / lower Iota ● vacuum magnetic well => hill & less shear PS-current suppression improves with higher mr / outward-shift / higher Iota Basic configuration variations - MHD and transport-properties IA=IB < 0 Decreasing ● PS-currents highiota Decreasing ● vac.magn.well ● shear ● PS-currents IA=-IB < 0 outward shifted I1< I2< I3< I4< I5 lowmirror Decreasing number of trapped particles; Beyond trapped particles in strong curvature region broad mirror inward shifted IA=-IB > 0 standard I1= I2= I3= I4= I5 highmirror Decreasing ● vac.magn.well ● shear ● PS-currents I1> I2> I3> I4> I5 lowiota Increasing number of trapped particles Increase of εeff IA=IB > 0 → V.V. Nemov et al., Phys. Plasmas 12, 112507 (2005) l-io = low-iota = 5/6 s-io = standard-iota = 5/5 h-io = high-iota = 5/4 cent'd = centered i-sh = inward-shifted o-sh = outward-shifted ● εeff minimum around mr=2%, increases with mr, strong increase for mr<0 bootstrap current coefficient D31 small for high-mirror configuration (mr=10%) ● bootstrap current Ibs > 0 for mr<10%, Ibs < 0 for mr > 10% ● plasma-β increases Ibs (reduces mr) ● D31 (r, Er , ν*) : net current may vanish, current density does not. Mirror scan (cent'd, iota=1) for norm. transport coeff. D*31 (DKES, vacuum conf.): ● strong mr-dependence ● minimum for mr~10% ● mr>10% iota-decreasing component dominates ● mr <10% iota-increasing component strong ● collisionality-dependence ● dependence on E (much less for electrons) r Strong dependence of bootstrap current on profiles (reff, Er, ν*) needs transport analysis For comparison of configuration effects use 20 -3 ● standard density profiles for n =10 m e,0 (X2) and for ne,0=1.5∙1020m-3 (O2) ● standard temperature profiles from transp. simulations : 5MW ECRH in stand. config. with ‹β›=2% (X2 or O2 according to density) ● simplification for bootstrap current calc.: ● neglect E in transport coefficients r (ion-root approximation) (X2) (O2) (i.e. transport coef.s from different configurations) Config.s at iota=1 (vacuum, ‹β›=2%, ‹β›=4%) ● I for mr bs ● ● ● εeff dependence on mr generally persists ● increase of ε with mr and Iota for mr > 3% eff new: ● reduction of ε with eff ● outward-shift, ● higher Iota at minimum (limited no of cases?) ● broad mirror configurations can reduce ε significantly eff ● narrow mirror configurations increase ε eff ● β-dependence not strictly decreasing for broad mirror → consider finite-β for best high-β confinement Ibs for β (configuration effect) Further dependencies: ● I for iota bs ● Ibs for outward-shifted configurations Ibs for broader mirror configurations Ibs from O2-scenario smaller than for X2 (temperature - collisionality) low-iota configurations need unrealistically large values of mr to make Ibs vanish! Configurations with inherently small bootstrap current ● Neoclassical transport: ● Steady-state divertor operation without transformer crucially depends on a vanishing or at least small bootstrap current (ECCD-capabilities good for n e,0≤1020m-3(140GHz, X2-mode) but insufficient for higher densities (140GHz, O2-mode). Estimation: Δι ≈0.00176·Itor [in kA] => 10-20kA will influence island position Mirror and β-scan: Fast particle confinement MHD-properties: Bootstrap current at iota=1: ● high-mirror config. ● broad mirror needs larger mr ● at high-iota (iota=5/4) ● stand. high-iota config. ● mirror may be adjusted Examples for small to almost vanishing bootstrap current at high-iota: vacuum, r/a=0.5 vacuum, r/a=0.5 stand. high-iota, ‹β›=2% X2-scenario => Ibs ≈ -8.5kA ● ‹β›=4.2%, r/a=0.5 ‹β›=4.2%, r/a=0.5 stand. high-iota, ‹β›=4% O2-scenario => Ibs ≈ -13.7kA stand.-iota, mr=11%, ‹β›=4% O2-scenario => Ibs ≈ -2.0kA min(Γv) almost independent of mr min(Γw) increases with mr ( Γs number of tr. part. increases!) ● fast particle confinement seems not to improve with increasing β ● lowest values of Γ in high-mirror configurations for (hi-io, o-sh)-case v Note: mr(vac.) > mr(β) ● Color-coding for jb : ions electrons
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz