LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO One more reason why truth-conditions are a central part of meaning: They allow for a simple account for “logical” words like not, and, or LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO The meaning of “NOT” and worlds The sentences (1) The circle is NOT (fully) inside the square means/refers to the set of worlds in which the circle does not contain the square. In all the remaining worlds, the sentence without negation (2) The circle is (fully) inside the square would be true. (The green set W contains all the infinite possible worlds.) w1 W (2) w2 w3 The meaning of negation “NOT” w4 w5 SEMANTIC INTUITIONS: Truth table for “NOT” w6 S1 = The circle is inside the square. not S1 = The circle is not inside the square. S1 True False not S1 False True (1) w7 w8 w10 w11 1 LIGN 130 w9 2 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO The meaning of conjunction “AND” “NOT” X W not-X not-X is the negation (or, technically, the “complement set”) of X that is, X not-X = and X not-X = W (the set of worlds X refers to and the set of worlds not-X refers to do not share any member (= their intersection is the empty set) and they together (=their union) form the set of all possible worlds W) 3 BASIC INTUITIONS: Truth table for “AND” S1 = The circle is (fully) inside the square. S2 = The triangle is (fully) inside the square. S1 and S2= The circle is (fully) inside the square and the triangle is (fully) inside the square (too). S1 True False True False S2 True True False False S1 and S2 True False False False 4 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO The meaning of “AND” and sets of worlds The complex sentence (1) The circle is (fully) inside the square AND the triangle is (fully) inside the square (too) means/refers to the (infinite) set of worlds in which the circle and the triangle are both inside the square, and therefore the sentence is true. (w4, w5 below) Notice that such set of worlds is equivalent to the intersection of the set of worlds in which the sentence (2) The circle is (fully) inside the square is true with the set of worlds in which the sentence (3) The triangle is (fully) inside the square is true. (2) w1 w2 “AND” X-and-Y = X Y the set of worlds X-and-Y refers to is identical to the set of the worlds both X and Y refer to, that is the set of the worlds in which both X and Y are true (=intersection) w3 (3) w6 w4 w5 (1) w7 w9 w10 5 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words 6 CAPONIGRO LIGN 130 Conjunction “OR”: one or two? The complex sentence (1) The circle is (fully) inside the square OR the triangle is (fully) inside the square means/refers to the (infinite) set of worlds in which the circle or the triangle is inside the square. And if they are both inside the square? CAPONIGRO (i) Exclusive “OR” 1. Truth table for exclusive “OR” S1 = The circle is (fully) inside the square. S2 = The triangle is (fully) inside the square. S1 ORexc S2 = The circle is (fully)inside the square or the triangle is (fully) inside the square (but not both). S1 True False True False 7 Lecture 6 – Logical Words S2 True True False False S1 ORexc S2 False True True False 8 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO 2. Exclusive “OR” and sets of worlds (2) w2 w3 w6 w4 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO “OR” exclusive (1) The circle is (fully) inside the square OR the triangle is (fully) inside the square means/refers to the set of worlds in which either the triangle or the circle is inside the square, but not both. This is equivalent to the set of worlds to which either the sentence (2) The circle is (fully) inside the square or the sentence (3) the triangle is (fully) inside the square refers to, but not both. (1) w1 LIGN 130 X-orEXCLUSIVE-Y = (X Y) – (X Y) the set of worlds X-orEXCL-Y refers to is identical to the set containing the worlds X refers to or the worlds Y refers to, but not the worlds both X and Y refer to, that is the union of X and Y minus the intersection of X and Y w5 w7 w9 w10 (3) 9 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words 10 CAPONIGRO (ii) Inclusive “OR” SOME FACTS: (a) If the circle is (fully) inside the square OR the triangle is (fully) inside the square on the blackboard behind the screen, the lecture is over. [Do you except the lecture to be over if the screen is lifted and you see both figures are inside the square?] (b) Every time the circle is (fully) inside the square OR the triangle is (fully) inside the square on the blackboard behind the screen, the lecture is over. LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words 1. Truth table for inclusive “OR” S1 ORinc S2= The circle is (fully) inside the square or the triangle is (fully) inside the square (or both). S1 True False True False S2 True True False False S1 ORinc S2 True True True False [Do you except the lecture to be over every time the screen is lifted and you see both figures are inside the square?] (c) It is not true that the circle is (fully) inside the square OR the triangle is (fully) inside the square on the blackboard behind the screen. [Do you think the sentence would be true if they are both in the square?] 11 CAPONIGRO 12 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO 2. Inclusive “OR” and sets of worlds (1) The circle is (fully) inside the square OR the triangle is (fully) inside the square means/refers to the set of worlds in which either the triangle or the circle are inside the square, or both. This is equivalent to the set of worlds to which either the sentence (2) The circle is (fully) inside the square or the sentence (3) the triangle is (fully) inside the square refers to, or both. (1) w1 (2) w2 w3 “OR” inclusive X-orINCLUSIVE-Y = X Y the set of worlds X-orINCL-Y refers to is identical to the set containing the worlds X refers to and/or the worlds Y refers to, that is the union of X and Y w6 w4 w7 w5 w9 w10 (3) 13 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words 14 CAPONIGRO Two “OR” or just one? Are there two homophonous words “or” with two different meanings? LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO SUMMARY: Basic semantic intuitions and basic logical words can be represented as relations between sets of worlds Or is there just one “OR” and which one? Inclusive “OR” is enough if pragmatics is taken into account. But see the posts from the Language Log (a popular blog for linguists) on the class webpage (1) Truth conditions Sentence X refers/means sets of worlds/situations Sentence Y refers/means (2) Synonymy X and Y are synonymous that is, X = Y (the set of worlds X refers to is identical to the set of worlds Y refers to) 15 16 LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words CAPONIGRO LIGN 130 Lecture 6 – Logical Words (3) Contradiction (6) “AND” X and Y are contradictory X-and-Y = X Y that is, X Y = CAPONIGRO (the set of worlds X-and-Y refers to is identical to the set of the worlds both X and Y refer to, that is the set of the worlds in which both X and Y are true (=intersection)) (the set of worlds X refers to and the set of worlds Y refers to do not share any member) (4) Entailment (7) “OR” inclusive X-orINCLUSIVE-Y = X Y Y entails X (the set of worlds X-orINCL-Y refers to is identical to the set containing the worlds X refers to and/or the worlds Y refers to, that is the union of X and Y) that is, Y X (the set of the worlds Y refers is contained [= is a subset of] of the set of worlds X refers to) W X (5) “NOT” not-X is the negation of X not-X that is, X not-X = and X not-X = W (the set of worlds X refers to and the set of worlds not-X refers to do not share any member (= their intersection is the empty set) and they together (=their union) form the set of all possible worlds W) 17 (8) “OR” exclusive X-orEXCLUSIVE-Y = (X Y) – (X Y) (the set of worlds X- orEXCL -Y refers to is identical to the set containing the worlds X refers to or the worlds Y refers to, but not the worlds both X and Y refer to that is the union of X and Y minus the intersection of X and Y) 18
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz