JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 21(1): 231–242, 2001 REVISION OF THE ENDEMIC AUSTRALIAN GENUS SANCHO (AMPHIPODA, EUSIRIDAE) J. K. Lowry and J. L. Barnard Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, 2010, NSW, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]) A B S T R A C T The endemic Australian eusirid amphipod genus Sancho Stebbing, 1897, is revised based on new material. A neotype is established for Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897, which is redescribed, and the new species S. kuiteri is described. Members of Sancho are considered to be obligate commensals of sponges. Their depressed body form and entire telson may be an adaptation to their commensal life-style, but their cantilevered second gnathopods may indicate a phylogenetic relationship with the Eusirus-like members of the Eusiridae. In 1897 Stebbing described Sancho platynotus from Port Jackson, Australia. The description and illustrations were brief, there was no habitat information, and the taxon was not placed in a family. Stebbing later (1906) placed Sancho in the Calliopiidae. So did J. L. Barnard (1969), who carefully considered the close relationship between calliopiids and eusirids and commented specifically on the eusirid-like gnathopods of Sancho. Barnard and Karaman (1991) amalgamated the Calliopiidae and Eusiridae and placed Sancho in the Eusiridae. They considered it to be a peculiar genus in the family mainly because of its depressed body and urosome. Before J. L. Barnard died in 1991, we were studying a new taxon from Port Jackson which appeared to be closely related to Sancho platynotus. Barnard was never convinced that Sancho belonged in the Eusiridae (= Calliopiidae) and was in favour of establishing a new family for S. platynotus and the new taxon. A major problem for us was that Sancho platynotus had never been collected again, and the original type material, placed in the Copenhagen Museum, was lost. Finally, after 101 years, Megan Huggett (Honours student, University of New South Wales) collected specimens of S. platynotus associated with the sponge Holopsamma laminaefavosa Carter, 1885, during a survey of amphipods associated with sponges in Botany Bay. Study of this new material from Botany Bay and the new taxon from Port Jackson has resolved many of the problems associated with the original description of Sancho. In this paper we redescribe S. platynotus and describe the new species Sancho kuiteri. Because the types of S. platynotus are lost and S. platynotus is the type species of the genus, we are establishing a neotype. Sancho platynotus is a fragile species, and there were no complete specimens in Huggett’s collections. The neotype is therefore a nearly complete female. Species of Sancho appear to be eusirid-like amphipods which have become morphologically adapted to living on sponges. The main differences between Sancho and other eusirid taxa are the shape of the head, the sexually dimorphic second gnathopods, and the depressed body and urosome. The only seemingly similar taxon is the poorly described Choroes incisus Stebbing, 1888, which also has a depressed body and urosome, but the shape of the head and the dimorphic nature of the gnathopods are unknown. According to K. H. Barnard (1931), who had many specimens (males and females) available for study, C. incisus also lives on sponges. Although J. L. Barnard was in favor of creating a new family for Sancho, it now seems better to retain Sancho in the Eusiridae until a thorough revision of the family and its sister taxa is achieved. Material used in this study is lodged in the Australian Museum, Sydney (AM). The following abbreviations are used on the figures: A, antenna; C, coxa; EP, epimeron; G, gnathopod; H, head; LL, lower lip; MD, mandible; MP, maxilliped; MPOP, maxilliped 231 232 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 2001 Fig. 1. Sancho kuiteri, new species, holotype m, 4.1 mm, AM P40664, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. outer plate; MPIP, maxilliped inner plate; MX, maxilla; P, pereiopod; PL, pleon; T, telson; U, uropod; UL, upper lip; UR, urosomite; l, left; r, right. Eusiridae Sancho Stebbing, 1897 Sancho Stebbing, 1897: 42.—Stebbing, 1906: 288.—J. L. Barnard, 1969: 179.—Barnard and Karaman, 1991: 339. Type Species.—Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897, by monotypy. Diagnosis.—Body strongly depressed, with urosome flexed under pleon. Antenna 1 accessory flagellum present, 1-articulate. Mandible molar triturative. Lower lip without inner lobes. Maxilla 1 inner plate with two apical setae. Maxilla 2 with outer plate slightly to strongly broader than inner plate; inner plate without oblique setal row. Maxilliped with outer plate not enlarged. Gnathopod 2 sexually dimorphic, weakly to strongly cantilevered in male. Uropod 3 with outer ramus one-third to three-fourths length of inner ramus. Telson entire or emarginate. Species Composition.—Sancho kuiteri, new species; S. platynotus Stebbing, 1897. Remarks.—Sancho is apparently endemic to southeastern Australia. Species in the genus appear to be obligate commensals of sponges, and as an adaptation to this life-style they have dorsoventrally flattened bodies and depressed urosomes similar to other commensals such as iciliids and maxillipiids, which are also endemic to the Indo-West Pacific area. Species of Sancho have notched telsons similar to the calliopiid-like members of the Eusiridae, but Sancho platynotus, in particular, has cantilevered gnathopods similar to the eusirid-like members of the family. If these cantilevered gnathopods are homologous then Sancho and Eusirus may have a common ancestor. It is interesting that Eusirus antarcticus Thomson, 1880 (sensu stricto), which lives in southern New Zealand, has a heavy body and broad legs like species of Sancho. Sancho kuiteri, new species Figs. 1–5 Type Material.—Holotype, m, 4.1 mm, AM P40664; Paratypes: f, 3.6 mm, P40665; m, 3.9 mm, P40666; f, LOWRY AND BARNARD: REVISION OF AMPHIPOD GENUS SANCHO 233 Fig. 2. Sancho kuiteri, new species, holotype m, 4.1 mm, AM P40664, f, 3.6 mm, AM P40665, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. 4.1 mm, P40667; juvenile, P40668; m, P40670; 133 specimens, P40669; off Green Point, Watsons Bay, Port Jackson, New South Wales, Australia, 33°50.6′S 151°16.55′E, living on the sponge Holopsamma laminaefavosa (AM Z5090), 10 m, R. Kuiter, 12 September 1981. ovigerous ff, AM P58135; Bare Island, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia, 33°59.53′S 151°13.83′E, living on the sponge Holopsamma laminaefavosa, 12 m, M. J. Huggett and R. De Nys, 13 August 1998. Additional Material.—4 mm, 12 ff and juveniles, AM P57935; 1 m, 2 juveniles, AM P57938; 2 ff, AM P58133; 7 mm, 12 ff and juveniles, AM P58134; 5 mm, 14 mostly Description.—Based on holotype male, 4.1 mm. Head and body white. Head longer than deep; lateral cephalic lobe poorly developed; 234 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 2001 Fig. 3. Sancho kuiteri, new species, holotype m, 4.1 mm, AM P40664, f, 3.6 mm, AM P40665, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. anteroventral margin rounded, anteroventral corner rounded; rostrum present, moderate length; eyes medium-sized, oval. Antenna 1 long, about 0.6 × body, 1.5 × as long as antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than (2 ×) article 2; article 2 longer than (1.6 ×) article 3; article 3 shorter than (0.3 ×) article 1; accessory flagellum present, minute, 1-articulate; flagellum 36-articulate, with sparse setae along posterior margin of most articles; calceoli absent. Antenna 2 peduncular article 3 short, length 0.8 × breadth, without flange on anterolateral margin; article 4 long, 1.7 × breadth; article 5 long, 4.5 × breadth; flagellum shorter than (0.8 ×) peduncle, 21-articulate; calceoli absent. Upper lip separate, not produced. Mandibles incisors symmetrical, left and right with 4 serrations; lacinia mobilis asymmetri- cal, left with 4 serrations, right with 2 serrations; accessory setal row, left with 2 serrate setae, right with 1 serrate seta; molars columnar, fully triturating, each with 4 long pappose setae; palp well developed, article 2 long, 1 × article 3; article 3 long. Lower lip inner lobes absent. Maxilla 1 inner plate small, subovate, with 2 apical setae; outer plate, with 11 strong setal-teeth; palp 2-articulate with about 8 apical or apicomedial setae. Maxilla 2 inner and outer plates broad; inner plate with apical slender setae, without medial slender setae, without oblique row of slender setae; outer plate with apical slender setae, without medial slender setae. Maxilliped inner plate large, nearly reaching end of merus, subrectangular, without nodular setae, without apicomedial setae, oblique setal row with 14 long plumose setae; outer plate sub- LOWRY AND BARNARD: REVISION OF AMPHIPOD GENUS SANCHO 235 Fig. 4. Sancho kuiteri, new species, holotype m, 4.1 mm, AM P40664, f, 3.6 mm, AM P40665, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. ovate, reaching to end of merus, with 6 pappose setae along apical margin, without robust setae along medial margin, without submarginal setae; palp large, 4-articulate; carpus broad, length 1.1 × propodus, with setose inner margin; propodus long, length 3.1 × breadth, without setose inner margin; dactylus cone-like, unguis absent. Pereion.—Gnathopod 1 not sexually dimorphic, subchelate, smaller than gnathopod 2; coxa deeper than wide, anteroventral mar- 236 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 2001 Fig. 5. Sancho kuiteri, new species, holotype m, 4.1 mm, AM P40664, f, 3.6 mm, AM P40665, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. gin slightly produced, subquadrate; basis without anterodistal lobe; carpus subrectangular, long, length 3 × breadth, subequal to (1.1 ×) propodus, posterior margin without lobe; propodus narrow, length 2 × breadth, palm transverse, straight, without seta near inner base of dactylus, with several posterodistal robust setae; dactylus slender, falcate. Gnathopod 2 sexually dimorphic, subchelate; coxa deeper than wide; basis without anterodistal lobe; carpus/propodus cantilevered on narrow hinge; carpus subquadrate, short, length 0.9 × breadth, shorter than (0.3 ×) propodus, not produced; propodus broad, length 1.7 × breadth, slightly produced posterodistally, palm acute, straight, crenate, without seta near inner base of dactylus, with several posterodistal robust setae; dactylus slender, falcate, inner margin smooth. Pereiopod 3 coxa deeper than wide; merus long, length about 1.5 × breadth, anterior margin slightly expanded; carpus long, about 1.5 × breadth; propodus length nearly 3 × breadth, with 2 setae along posterior margin. Pereiopod 4 coxa as wide as deep, with a subquadrate posteroventral lobe. Pereiopod 5 coxa wider than deep, equilobate; basis strongly expanded posteriorly, with long slender setae along anterior margin; merus short, length about 1 × breadth; carpus long, subrectangular, length about 1.7 × breadth, covered in minute denticles; propodus subrectangular, length about 2.5 × breadth, with 3 slender setae and 5 robust setae along anterior margin, not expanded distally, with about 20 setae along posterior margin; dactylus short, slightly curved, inner margin smooth. Pereiopod 6 coxa as wide as deep, with welldeveloped posteroventral lobe; basis expanded, with slender setae along anterior margin, posterior margin slightly rounded, crenate; merus short, length 1 × breadth; carpus long, length 1.2 × breadth; propodus subrectangular, length about 2.8 × breadth, covered in minute denticles, without 4 slender setae along anterior margin, without distal robust setae; dactylus slightly curved, with subterminal seta on posterior margin. Pereio pod 7 coxa wider than deep, without pos- LOWRY AND BARNARD: REVISION OF AMPHIPOD GENUS SANCHO teroventral lobe; basis with posterior margin straight, crenate; carpus and propodus covered in minute denticles. Pleon.—Epimeron 3 posteroventral corner subquadrate, with minute acute spine. Uropod 1 peduncle with 8 dorsolateral robust setae and 6 dorsomedial robust setae; outer ramus shorter than inner ramus; outer ramus with 2 lateral, 1 medial, and 2 apical robust setae; inner ramus with 4 medial, 2 lateral, and 2 apical robust setae. Uropod 2 peduncle with 5 dorsolateral robust setae, and 1 dorsomedial robust seta; outer ramus shorter than inner; with 3 lateral, 2 medial, and 2 apical robust setae; inner ramus with 4 medial, 6 lateral, and 2 apical robust setae. Uropod 3 peduncle short, without dorsolateral or dorsomedial robust setae; outer ramus shorter than inner; outer ramus with 2 lateral and 2 medial robust setae; inner ramus with 4 medial and 2 lateral robust setae. Telson notched, as long as broad, length 1 × breadth, without dorsal robust setae, with sparse dorsal slender setae, distal margins rounded, without apical penicillate setae, with 1 apical slender seta on each lobe, without apical robust setae. Female.—Based on paratype female. Gnathopod 1 subequal to gnathopod 2; carpus long, length 3 × breadth, longer than (1.2 ×) propodus; palm slightly obtuse, convex. Gnathopod 2 carpus subrectangular, very long, length 4 × breadth, longer than (1.2 ×) propodus; propodus narrow, length 3.1 × breadth, not produced posterodistally, palm slightly obtuse, straight, smooth, inner margin setose. Pereiopod 5 coxa with posteroventral lobe. Etymology.—Named for the collector, Rudi Kuiter, in recognition of his contribution to the knowledge of Australian marine animals. Habitat.—Living mainly in association with the sponge Holopsamma laminaefavosa and occasionally with the sponge Phoriospongia cf. kirki (Bowerbank, 1841). Remarks.—Sancho kuiteri and S. platynotus are closely related sister taxa which live together in the same sponge gardens, although S. kuiteri appears to be restricted to fewer species of sponges than S. platynotus. Sancho kuiteri was collected almost exclusively on Holopsamma laminaefavosa whereas S. 237 platynotus was collected on eight species of sponges and only rarely on Holopsamma laminaefavosa. Both species show remarkable similarities in the depressed body form, the unusual gnathopods, unusual coxae 4, and pereiopods 5 to 7. The gnathopods, for instance, show a similar development pattern, which only differs in adult males, where the carpus becomes strongly cantilevered and the propodus becomes ovate in Sancho platynotus. Apparently neither species has calceoli. Distribution.—Port Jackson and Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897 Figs. 6–9 Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897: 42, pl. 9A.—Stebbing, 1906: 288, figs. 72, 73. Type Material.—Neotype f, 3.9 mm, AM P58144. Bare Island, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia, 33°59.53′S 151°13.83′E, 12 m, sponge, M. J. Huggett and R. De Nys, 13 August 1998. Additional Material Examined.—1 m, 4.5 mm, AM P58136 on sponge; 1 f, 3.5 mm, AM P58143 on sponge; 1 m, 3.5 mm, AM P58146 on sponge; 1 f, 3.5 mm, AM P58147 on sponge; 2 specimens AM P 57910 on sponge; 1 specimen AM P 57933 on the sponge Antho (Isopenectya) chartacea (Whitelegge, 1907); 1 specimen AM P 57934 on the sponge Callyspongia sp.; 2 specimens P 57936 on the finger sponge Phorbas sp.; 1 specimen AM P57937 on the sponge Mycale (Carmia) sp.; 2 specimens AM P57938 on the sponge Phoriospongia cf. kirki; Bare Island, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia 33°59.53′S 151°13.83′E, 12 m, sponge, M. J. Huggett and R. De Nys, 13 August 1998. Description.—Based on the neotype female, 3.9 mm, P58144, plus female, 3.5 mm P58143 and female, 3.5 mm P58147. Head and body white. Head as long as deep; lateral cephalic lobe poorly developed; anteroventral margin rounded, anteroventral corner rounded; rostrum present, short; eyes medium-sized, round. Antenna 1 medium length, about 0.3 × body; peduncular article 1 longer than (1.6 ×) article 2; article 2 longer than (2 ×) article 3; article 3 shorter than (0.3 ×) article 1; accessory flagellum present, minute, 1-articulate; flagellum about 45-articulate; with sparse setae along posterior margin of most articles; calceoli absent. Antenna 2 about 35-articulate; calceoli absent. Upper lip separate. Mandibles incisors symmetrical, left and right each with 5 ser- 238 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 2001 Fig. 6. Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897, m, 4.5 mm, AM P58136, neotype f, AM P58144, urosome. Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. rations; lacinia mobilis asymmetrical, left with 3 serrations, right with 4 serrations; accessory setal row absent; molars columnar, fully triturating, with 5 long pappose setae on left side only; palp well developed, article 2 long, 1 × article 3; article 3 long. Lower lip inner lobes absent. Maxilla 1 inner plate longer than broad, subrectangular, with 2 apical setae; outer plate with 11 strong setalteeth; palp 2-articulate, with 8 apical or apicomedial setae. Maxilla 2 inner plate narrow, outer plate broader; inner plate with apical slender setae, without medial slender setae, without oblique row of slender setae; outer plate with apical slender setae, without medial slender setae. Maxilliped inner plate medium size, reaching about halfway along merus, subrectangular, without nodular setae, without apicomedial setae, oblique setal row with about 20 long plumose setae; outer plate subovate, reaching to end of merus, with 3 pappose setae along apical margin, with 10 robust setae along medial margin, without submarginal setae; palp large, 4-articulate; carpus broad, length 1.1 × propodus, with setose inner margin; propodus long, length 3.1 × broad, without setose inner margin; dactylus cone-like, unguis absent. Pereion.—Gnathopod 1 not sexually dimorphic, slightly chelate, subequal to gnatho- pod 2; coxa deeper than wide, anteroventral margin produced, rounded; basis without anterodistal lobe; carpus subrectangular, long, length 3 × breadth, longer than (1.4 ×) propodus, posterior margin without lobe; propodus narrow, length 1.8 × breadth, palm slightly obtuse, convex, without seta near inner base of dactylus, with several posterodistal robust setae; dactylus slender, falcate. Gnathopod 2 sexually dimorphic, chelate; coxa deeper than wide; basis without anterodistal lobe; carpus/propodus cantilevered on narrow hinge; carpus subrectangular, long, length 3.2 × breadth, longer than (1.2 ×) propodus, not produced; propodus narrow, length 2.9 × breadth, not produced posterodistally, palm slightly obtuse, slightly convex, smooth, without seta near inner base of dactylus, with several posterodistal robust setae; dactylus slender, falcate, inner margin with long setae. Pereiopod 3 coxa deeper than wide; merus long, length about 1.5 × breadth, anterior margin slightly expanded; carpus long, length about 2 × breadth; propodus length about 2.5 × breadth, with 2 setae along posterior margin. Pereiopod 4 coxa slightly deeper than wide, with a subquadrate posteroventral lobe; merus long, length about 1.8 × breadth, anterior margin slightly expanded. Pereiopod 5 coxa wider than deep, with posteroventral LOWRY AND BARNARD: REVISION OF AMPHIPOD GENUS SANCHO 239 Fig. 7. Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897, neotype f, 3.9 mm, AM P58144, f, 3.5 mm, AM P58143, A1, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. lobe; basis strongly expanded posteriorly, with robust setae along anterior margin; merus short, length about 1 × breadth; carpus long, subrectangular, length about 1.5 × breadth; propodus subrectangular, length about 3 × breadth, with 3 rows of slender setae and 5 robust setae along anterior margin, not expanded distally, with about 5 rows of setae along posterior margin; dactylus short, slightly curved, inner margin smooth. Pereio- pod 6 coxa as wide as deep, with well-developed posteroventral lobe; basis expanded, with slender setae along anterior margin, posterior margin slightly rounded, smooth; merus long, length 1.2 × breadth; carpus long, length 3 × breadth; propodus subrectangular, length about 3 × breadth, with 3 rows of slender setae along anterior margin, without distal robust setae; dactylus slightly curved, with subterminal seta on posterior margin. Pereiopod 240 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 2001 Fig. 8. Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897, neotype f, 3.9 mm, AM P58144, m, 3.5 mm, AM P58146, G1, 2, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Scale bars = 0.2 mm. 7 coxa wider than deep, with broad, shallow posteroventral lobe; basis with posterior margin straight, smooth. Pleon.—Epimeron 3 posteroventral corner acute with minute notch. Uropod 1 peduncle with 6 dorsolateral robust setae and 5 dorsomedial robust setae; outer ramus shorter than inner ramus; outer ramus with 3 lateral and 2 apical robust setae; inner ramus with 1 medial, 4 lateral, and 4 apical robust setae. Uropod 2 peduncle with 5 dorsolateral robust setae and 1 dorsomedial robust seta; outer ramus shorter than inner; outer ramus with 4 lateral, 4 medial and 2 apical robust setae; inner ramus with 4 medial, 6 lateral and 2 apical robust setae. Uropod 3 peduncle short LOWRY AND BARNARD: REVISION OF AMPHIPOD GENUS SANCHO 241 Fig. 9. Sancho platynotus Stebbing, 1897, neotype f, 3.9 mm, AM P58144, m, 3.5 mm, AM P58146, *f, 3.5 mm, AM P58147, Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Scale bars for P1–P7 = 0.2 mm, for U1–U3 and T = 0.1 mm. without dorsolateral and robust setae; outer ramus shorter than inner; outer ramus with 4 lateral and 2 medial; inner ramus with 7 medial and 5 lateral robust setae. Telson notched, as long as broad, length about 1 × breadth, without dorsal robust setae, with sparse dor- sal slender setae, distal margins truncated, without apical penicillate setae, with 1 apical slender seta on each lobe, without apical robust setae. Male.—Based on adult male, 3.5 mm. Gnathopod 1 subchelate, smaller than gnatho- 242 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 2001 pod 2; anteroventral margin slightly produced, subquadrate; length 2.6 × breadth, (1.2 ×) propodus; length 1.4 × breadth, palm transverse, straight. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; carpus subovate, length 2.8 × breadth, shorter than (0.6 ×) propodus; propodus broad, length 1.4 × breadth, palm slightly acute, slightly concave, smooth; inner margin with short setae. Pereiopod 5 with long slender setae along anterior margin; with 3 rows of robust setae along anterior margin. Pereiopod 6 with slender setae along crenate anterior margin. Habitat.—Living in association with the sponges Antho (Isopenectya) chartacea, Callyspongia sp., Phorbas sp., Mycale (Carmia) sp., Phoriospongia cf. kirki, and Holopsamma laminaefavosa. Remarks.—See comments under S. kuiteri. Distribution.—Port Jackson and Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS At the time of Jerry Barnard’s death (1991), he and I had illustrated and described Sancho kuiteri. We could not finish the paper because we had no material of S. platynotus. After Megan Huggett collected S. platynotus (1998), I finished the paper more or less as we had planned. I would like to thank Rudi Kuiter and Megan Huggett for collecting the animals that form the basis of this paper. I would like to thank Jerry Barnard, who initially recognised S. kuiteri as a close relative of S. platynotus and initiated this study. I thank Helen Stoddart, who made the whole animal drawing of S. platynotus and also made many useful comments on the manuscript; Rachael Peart, who illustrated the rest of S. platynotus; and John Hooper, who identified the sponges. Finally, this paper is dedicated to Arthur Humes, who did not study amphipods but for many years provided us with inspirational copepod taxonomy and with the wonderful Journal of Crustacean Biology. LITERATURE CITED Barnard, J. L. 1969. The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda.—United States National Museum Bulletin 271: 1–535. ———, and G. Karaman. 1991. The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids).—Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 13(2): 419–866. Barnard, K. H. 1931. Amphipoda.—Discovery Reports 5: 1–326. Stebbing, T. R. R. 1888. Report on the Amphipoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876.—Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76, Zoology 29: 1–1737, pls. 1–210. ———. 1897. Amphipoda from the Copenhagen Museum and other sources.—Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, (Zoology) 7: 25–45. ———. 1906. Amphipoda I. Gammaridea.—Das Tierreich 21: 1–806. RECEIVED: 10 April 2000. ACCEPTED: 5 June 2000.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz