ARO Research Opportunities

ARO Basic Research
for the Soldier
Research Funding
by State
>$10M
>$5M<$10M
>$2M<$5M
<$2M
Dr. Stephen Lee
Chief Scientist
US Army Research Office
US Army Research Laboratory
Army Research Office Overview
Utilize the vast intellectual capital of our
nation’s universities to:
Exploit Scientific Opportunities for
Revolutionary New Army Capabilities
Research Funding
by State
Drive Science to Develop Solutions to
Existing Army Technology Needs
Accelerate Transition of Basic Research
>$15M
>$8M<$15M
>$2M<$8M
<$2M
Strengthen University, Industry,
Government Partnerships
p
Educate and Train the Future S&E
Workforce for the Army
• 256 Institutes of Higher Learning
• 861 individual Investigators
• 47 Research Centers
Research Thrusts
Chemistry
Computing &
Info Science
Electronics
Environmental
Life Sciences
Materials
Mathematics
Mechanics
Network Science
Nanoscience
Physics
Research ranges from
atom optics for
underground
bunker/tunnel detection
to nano-energetics for
more powerful and
insensitive munitions
and propellants
Balanced Basic Research Portfolio
Must Address Both Opportunity Driven Research and
Need Driven Research
Opportunity
Driven Rsch
Return on Investment
(Understanding
& Performance)
Need Driven
Research
Investment ($, Time)
• Need Driven Research – emphasis on improving specific capabilities or
overcoming identified technology barriers
• Opportunity Driven Research - emphasis on developing and exploiting
scientific breakthroughs to produce revolutionary new capabilities
1
Opportunity and Need Driven Examples
• Extrapolation of Existing Technologies (Need Driven)
– Incremental, Continued Improvement in Existing
Technologies
– Often Driven or Enabled by Commercial Market
• CPU on a chip
• Inexpensive GPS
– May be a “Disruptive Technology” (e.g. personal vs. mini
computers)
• Revolutionary New Applications from Scientific
Breakthroughs (Opportunity Driven)
– Utilizes Two Somewhat Distinct Mechanisms
• Fundamentally new approaches to solving old problems
• Fundamentally new capabilities
– Examples from Past
• Navigation - Satellites and atom clocks for GPS
• Range Finders and Target Designators - Lasers
– Examples for the Future
• Atom Optics for Jam-Proof Navigation
• Quantum Informatics for Computation, Secure Communication,
Imaging
• Nano-energetics for propellants and explosives
• Micro-active flow control
Basic Research’s Critical Role
“None of the most important weapons transforming
warfare in the 20th century - the airplane, tank, radar,
jet engine, helicopter, electronic computer, not even the
atomic bomb - owed its initial development to a
Doctrinal Requirement or request of the military.”
John Chambers, ed., The Oxford Companion to American Military History (New York,
Oxford University Press, 1999) p. 791
The details of this provocative quote can be debated;
but it in any case, it is absolutely clear that RDEC
and stakeholder input is critical for:
• Transitioning basic research
• Identifying needs-driven basic research
• And identifying revolutionary science/engineering
ARO Strategic Goals & Objectives
• Exploit scientific opportunities for revolutionary new capabilities
• Apply science to generate solutions to existing needs
• Prevent technological surprises
• Accelerate the transition of research to application
• “Honest Broker” for the Army for objective assessments
• Leverage S&T of outside sources for Army benefit
• Strengthen university, in-house, industry partnerships
• Foster S&E training in disciplines critical to the Army
• Enhance outreach efforts for greater intellectual diversity
2
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
Associate Director
for
Plans & Programs
Dr. Reed Skaggs
Military Deputy
Director
Mr. John Miller
Associate Director
for Science & Technology
COL Bobby Smith
Deputy Director
for Basic Science
& Director ARO
Dr. David Skatrud
Dr. Volker Weiss
Sergeant Major
Timothy Weatherspoon
Associate Director
for Laboratory Operations
Ms. Teresa Kines
Vehicle
Technology
Human Research
& Engineering
Survivability/
Lethality Analysis
Computational &
Information Sciences
Sensors &
Electron Devices
Weapons &
Materials Research
Army Research Office
Information Sciences
Physical Sciences
Engineering Sciences
Army Research Office Organization
Director
Operations
Directorate
Chief Scientist
Physical
Sciences
Engineering
Sciences
Informational
Sciences
Support
Management
Ph i
Physics
Mechanical
Sciences
Mathematical
Sciences
Information
Management
Chemistry
Materials
Science
Computational
Sciences
Acquisition
Center
Life
Sciences
Electronics
Network
Sciences
Environmental
Sciences
Outreach
Programs
~ 100 employees at RTP
45 PhD Program Managers
Army Research Office Organization
Physical Sciences Directorate
Chemical
Sciences
Organic and
Inorganic Chemistry
Life Sciences
Molecular Genetics
Electrochemistry
Microbiology
Polymer Chemistry
Biochemistry
Physical Chemistry
Neuroscience
Physics
Optical
O ti l Physics
Ph i &
Imaging Science
Atomic & Molecular
Physics
Quantum Information
Science
Condensed Matter
3
Army Research Office Organization
Engineering Sciences Directorate
Electronics
Solid State Devices
Electromagnetics
& RF Circuits
Mechanical
Science
Materials
Science
Environmental
Sciences
Fluid Dynamics
Mechanical
Behavior of
Materials
Atmospheric Science
Synthesis &
Processing of
Materials
Habitation Science
Propulsion &
Energetics
Sensors &
Detectors
Solid Mechanics
Optoelectronics
Structures &
Dynamics
Terrestrial Science
Physical
Properties of
Materials
Quantum
Electromagnetic
Devices
Army Research Office Organization
Information Sciences Directorate
Technology
Integration
& Outreach
Mathematical
Sciences
Computing
Sciences
Network
Sciences
Bio-Mathematics
o at e at cs &
Informatics
Numerical
Analysis
Intelligent
Networks
Modeling of Complex
Systems
Computational
Architecture &
Visualization
Decision & NeuroSciences
Probability &
Statistics
Cooperative
Mathematics
Youth Sciences
Historically Black
Colleges,
Universities, and
Minority
Institutions
Communications &
Human Networks
Information
Processing &
Fusion
Small Business
Programs
Multi-agent
Network Control
Small Business
Innovation
Research(SBIR)
Small Business
Technology
Transfer(STTR)
Information &
Software
Assurance
University Basic Research Partnerships
Single Investigator (SI)
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
~$110K/yr for 3 yr periods
Continually open BAA Solicitation
~120 new grants/year
All States, >240 Universities
HBCU/MI ARO Core Grants
ƒ
ƒ
Topics from ARO BAA
~110K/yr for 3 yr periods
Centers of Excellence
ƒ Materials Center - 6.1 Basic Research
ƒ High-Performance Computing
Center - 6.1 Basic Research
ƒ Flexible Displays Center
ƒ
ƒ
For states receiving least amt of federal
funds
3 year support
Annual BAA Solicitation
MURIs
Engaging the
Extramural
Research
Community
to Focus on
Army Problems
- 6.2 Applied Research
$5 – 8M range
8 – 10 years in duration
Consortia of academic and industrial concerns
Potential New Areas: Robotics, Cognition and
Neuroergonomics, and Network Science
ƒ International Technology Alliance (US/UK)
- Industrial/Academic Consortium
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
$50K Limit
Short-term, proof-of-principle rsch
Part of SI Continual BAA Solicitation
ƒ
ƒ No New COEs Planned
CTAs
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
DEPSCoR
Battlefield Centers of
Excellence
ƒ Limited to HBCUs
ƒ New competition in FY09
ƒ ~$200K per year
STIR
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
~$1.25M per year
3 yyear pperiod
10 new initiatives annually
Annual BAA Solicitation
UARCs
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
4 consortia (ISN, ICB, ICT, IAT)
5 year efforts
~$5 – 10M per year
No new UARCs anticipated
SBIR/STTR
ƒ Small Business Research
ƒ Phase I and Phase II efforts
ƒ www.armysbir.com for more information
4
Strategy Development Cycle
Research Strategy Planning
Requirements
Generation
Workshops, conferences, discussions
with PIs, literature, PCOG
Scientific
Opportunities
Topic Formation
TRADOC
Army S&T Master Plan
ARL Strategy Planning
Workshops
Army Advisory Boards
Army S&E
Combine Army impact
and scientific opportunity
Army
Operational
Needs
Proposal
Solicitation
S
li it ti
BAA
whitepapers
informal discussions
Program
Assessment
Formal external feedback,
BOV,TARA,TAB
Proposal
Evaluation
Army Relevant
Technology
Army S&E and peer review
Selection on quality and relevance
Program
Execution
SL/SC participation; collaboration
Proposal Evaluation and Selection
PM interactions
with potential
PIs
Development of Ideas
White Papers
Evaluate fit to program
goals and quality of
proposal
Funding decision is
based on balancing
needs and opportunities,
program portfolio,
Army objectives
Receive Proposals
Army Lab/RDEC
Review
Science Peer Review
Evaluate scientific
merit
Scores/comments of Army
and external reviewers are
assessed
Evaluate technical merit,
Army relevance, desired
participation: SL/SC
Analysis of Evaluations
PM Recommendation
Management
Assessment
ARL Basic Research Portfolio
From Ideas to Technology
Single
Investigator
Program
$63M
University
Research
Initiative
$75M
University
Affiliated
Research Centers
(UARCs)
$34M
University
Centers of
Excellence
$26M
Collaborative
Technology
Alliances
$48M
Complementary Programs Cohesively Managed
5
ARO Funded Nobel Laureates
Major impact on national defense
and civilian economy
COMMS FIBER
OPTICS SMART
MUNITIONS MRI,
SURGERY CDS..
SUPERCONDUCTERS
ELECTRON DEVICES
Charles H.
Townes
Nobel Laureate Examples:
Superconductors Solid State
Electronics Smart Munitions
Laser Range Finder
Target Designation
Fiber Optics GPS
Lasers 1964
John Bardeen,
Leon Cooper
J. Robert Schrieffer
Superconductivity 1972
Brian D.
Josephson
Josephson
Junction 1973
Leo Esaki
Superlattices 1973
W. M. Lipscomb
Borane
Compounds 1976
SEMICONDUCTORS
OPTOELECTRONICS
SENSORS
COMPUTERS
Herbert C.
Brown
Boron and
Phosphorous
Compounds 1979
HIGH ENERGY ROCKET
AND MISSILE
PROPELLANTS
TARGET
DESIGNATION AND
ILLUMINATION
RANGE FINDERS
EYE PROTECTION
REMOTE
SENSING
Arthur Schalow
Solid State Laser
1981
ENERGY STORAGE DISPLAYS
PROTECTIVE MATERIALS HIPERFORMANCE ELECTRONICS
Alan Heeger
Conductive
Polymers
2000
ROOM TEMP NIGHT VISION
HI-PERFORMANCE INFO
PROCESSING
N. Bloembergen
Hans Dehmelt
Ion Trap - 1989
Non-linear Optics
1981
Richard Smalley
Robert F. Curl
Buckminster Fullerene
1996
Herbert Kroemer
Semiconductor
Heterostructures
2000
HI-PRECISION
TIMING &
POSITION
LOCATION
Daniel Tsui
Quantum Fluid
1998
Cornell, Wieman, Ketterle
Bose-Einstein Condensation
2001
SEMICONDUCTOR LASER,
NANOELECTRONICS, OEICS
Linda Buck
Olfaction ID
2004
ATOM
OPTICS
Army Research Office
Questions?
www.aro.army.mil
6