The Meaning of Life Jamie Johnson BEng MSc CEng MIMechE C 130 P C-130 Program Di Director t Cascade Aerospace [email protected] Scope • • • • • • Concept of fatigue Regulations g & fatigue g management g Usage monitoring Fatigue testing Damage patterns Options Structural Fatigue • Degradation of strength & stiffness of a structure as a result of repeated application of loads during in-service operations Fatigue • Due to load ‘cycles’ rather than ‘steady state’ loads – Rate of load application not important – Damaging loads can be much less than static limit loads • Fatigue damage is ‘cumulative’ Fatigue • ‘Damaged’ item may retain original static strength until: – Local stress concentration causes crack to grow rapidly – Crack causes significant loss in area Fatigue • ‘Fatigue exhibits ‘scatter’ – Failure of a given component under a given load will not always occur at the same time – Distribution tends to be ‘Log Normal’ Fatigue • Local Cracks – Single cracks appearing at areas of local stress concentration – Behaviour can be observed from test or predicted analytically l i ll – If crack location is known then it can be inspected f [or for [ partt replaced] l d] – Effect on structural integrity can be analysed Fatigue • Widespread Fatigue Damage (WFD) – Multiple cracks appearing at numerous locations – Behaviour can be observed in tests, but is almost impossible to predict analytically – Cracks can ‘interact’ such that small flaws can become critical rapidly – Effect on structural integrity can be equally difficult to predict Regulations & Fatigue Management • Regulations applied to prevent local cracks becoming critical & to retire aircraft before the occurrence of WFD • Fatigue Management policies generally based on Full Scale Test (FST) Regulations & Fatigue Management • Safe Life based on retiring aircraft/components before a significant probability of WFD exists – Valid up to 1/3 Test Life Regulations & Fatigue Management • Damage Tolerance: an inspection-based method of finding cracks before they become critical – Initial Inspection based on half the time for initial flaw (ai) to grow to critical crack length (aCR) – Repeat Inspection based on half Initial or half the time i for f a detectable d bl crackk (a ( NDI) to become b critical ii l (whichever is least) Regulations & Fatigue Management Regulations & Fatigue Management Regulations & Fatigue Management FAA Limits • AD 2011-09-04 Centre Wing Inspection – 40K AFH repeat 10K AFH • Rule $121.1115 WFD LOV – 50K AFH/20K Cycles y Military Usage • Mission by Mission; – Usage is defined in Equivalent Baseline Hours (EBH) – EBH = Airframe Hours (AFH) x Severity Factor (SF) • Flight g byy Flight g Usage; Flight by Flight Measured Flight Data Crack Growth Algorithm Inspections Usage; Mission by Mission Sample Flight Data Define Mission Profiles Define Mission Mix Single Mission Usage Mixed Usage “Baseline” Mission Crack Growth SEVERITY FACTOR Baseline Crack Growth Inspections Usage •Severity Factor dependant on; –Take Off Weight g –Altitude –GAG GAG Cycles (Mission Length) –[Airspeed] –[Environment] –[Manoeuvre] Usage Mission Type Utilization % AFH Severity Factor EBH Long Range Logistics 50 8 000 8,000 0 75 0.75 6 000 6,000 Short Range Logistics 25 4,000 3 12,000 o g Range a ge Tactical ac ca Long 12.5 5 2,000 ,000 2 4,000 ,000 Short Range Tactical 12.5 2,000 4.5 9,000 Total 100 16,000 1.94 31,000 Usage • LM/USAF Baseline becoming C-130 standard • SB 82-788 Wing g Operational p Usage g & Service Life Assessment • Full LM Usage Assessment (or DaDTA) USAF Wing Durability Test • Conducted by Lockheed Martin on behalf of USAF: – – – – – 1998-1992 Tip to tip B/E/H center wing H84 outer wing USAF spectrum Economic Life • As aircraft ages more cracks are likely to occur: – – – – More inspections More rectification Higher costs Lower availability Options • • • • Inspect Rework Refurbish Replace Inspections • Aim to detect smallest flaw possible; in order to gain largest interval • Best techniques are most intrusive • Practical limitations on how many repeat inspections can be carried out • LoV provides backstop Rework • Rework or replace elements where localized cracking is known to occur: – – – – – Reduces future inspection and maintenance burden Reduces probability of major repairs Increases availability Does NOT increase Service Life Improvement factors not recognized by all certification agencies WASP • Wing Availability & Sustainment Program (WASP) • SB82-771: recommends rainbow fitting replacement at or before 25,000 EBH Refurbish • Replace all fatigue-prone structure (up to 90%) • Assembly y techniques q and processes p are critical • Final product has to certified and given Service Life • NRE is significant; low volume costs will approach or exceed replacement assemblies or aircraft Replace • New center wings in production – Incremental design improvement incorporated – Extended Service Life wing • Installation p process and equipment q p defined – Reduced NRE • OEM-certified product • Used aircraft and structural assemblies readily available Replace Case Study L Lower Fwd F dS Spar C Cap Splice Tee Engine Mount Truss Lower Cap AL Web CWS 174.30L Steel Web VIEW LOOKING AFT - LH CWS 178.78L Summary • Structural Fatigue principle driver of Service of Life • Usage Evaluation critical for comparison • Rework activities preventative measure against significant repairs Questions?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz