0013-7227/01/$03.00/0 Printed in U.S.A. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 86(10):4630 – 4634 Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society Analysis of the GNAS1 Gene in Albright’s Hereditary Osteodystrophy W. AHRENS, O. HIORT, P. STAEDT, T. KIRSCHNER, C. MARSCHKE, AND K. KRUSE Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) is characterized by phenotypic signs that typically include brachydactyly and sc calcifications occurring with or without hormone resistance toward PTH or other hormones such as thyroid hormone or gonadotropins. Different inactivating mutations of the gene GNAS1 encoding Gs␣ lead to a reduced Gs␣ protein activity in patients with AHO and pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia or without resistance to PTH (pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism). We investigated 29 unrelated patients with AHO and pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia or pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism and their affected family members performing functional and molecular genetic analysis of Gs␣. In vitro determination of Gs␣ protein activity in erythrocyte membranes was followed by the investigation of the whole coding region of the GNAS1 gene using PCR, nonisotopic A LBRIGHT’S HEREDITARY OSTEODYSTROPHY (AHO) is a genetic disorder characterized by phenotypic signs of brachydactyly, sc calcifications, short stature, obesity, and mental retardation (1). The disease is often associated with pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP) and other endocrinopathies such as hypothyroidism and hypogonadism. It is caused by a reduced activity of the adenylyl cyclase stimulating protein Gs␣. These patients with AHO and PHP (PHP Ia) can be distinguished from patients with signs of AHO and Gs␣ deficiency but without biochemical evidence of hormone resistance [pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism (PPHP)]. Both autosomal dominant inherited disorders can occur in the same family. It has been recognized that in the case of maternal transmission the children develop PHP Ia; on the other hand, if the mutation is derived from the father, the children develop PPHP. This parental origin effect has led to the suggestion of Gs␣ imprinting (2, 3). In addition, an AHO-like syndrome associated with a deletion of chromosome 2q37 but normal Gs␣ protein activity is known (4, 5). The human Gs␣ gene GNAS1 is located at chromosome 20q13 spanning 20 kb. The coding region is divided into 13 exons (6); however, additional exons and alternative splicing products have been described (7). During the last years about 35 different inactivating mutations in the GNAS1 gene have been identified in patients with AHO and PHP or PPHP (3, 8 –26). Except for a 4-bp deletion in exon 7 (10, 18, 22, 27, 28), no mutational hot spot has been described. Due to the clinical Abbreviations: AHO, Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy; d, deoxy; P, patient; PHP, pseudohypoparathyroidism; PPHP, pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism; SSCA, single strand conformation analysis. single strand conformation analysis, and direct sequencing of the PCR products. All patients showed a reduced Gs␣ protein activity (mean 59% compared with healthy controls). In 21/29 (72%) patients, 15 different mutations in GNAS1 including 11 novel mutations were detected. In addition we add five unrelated patients with a previously described 4 bp deletion in exon 7 (⌬ GACT, codon 189/ 190), confirming the presence of a hot spot for loss of function mutations in GNAS1. In eight patients, no molecular abnormality was found in the GNAS1 gene despite a functional defect of Gs␣. We conclude that biochemical and molecular analysis of Gs␣ and its gene GNAS1 can be valuable tools to confirm the diagnosis of AHO. However, in some patients with reduced activity of Gs␣, the molecular defect cannot be detected in the exons encoding the common form of Gs␣. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 4630 – 4634, 2001) and genetic heterogeneity, a clear-cut phenotype/genotype correlation seems not to be possible. We investigated a cohort of patients with AHO and in some cases affected family members to verify the diagnosis employing biochemical analysis of Gs␣ protein activity. In addition, we aimed to characterize the underlying molecular defect by analyzing the GNAS1 gene. Materials and Methods Patients Twenty-eight children (15 girls and 13 boys, age between 4 months and 15 yr) and one female adult (age 31 yr) from unrelated families were investigated. The patients showed an AHO phenotype with clinical symptoms as described above including brachydactyly in the case of 16 patients and sc calcifications noted in 9 children. Moreover, for 25 patients the diagnosis of hypothyroidism was made. In addition, hypogonadism was diagnosed in case of the affected adult woman. Depending on the analysis of calcium metabolism, which included the measurement of serum calcium, phosphate and intact PTH, 26 patients were classified as PHP Ia. Three young children showed no resistance to PTH at the time of investigation (Table 1). Furthermore, we investigated 16 affected family members with AHO [13 mothers (M), two brothers (B), and one sister (S)]. The siblings and one mother were classified as PHP Ia, 12 mothers showed no alteration of calcium metabolism (PPHP). All patients or parental guardians consented to the determination of Gs␣ protein activity and molecular genetic analysis of the GNAS1 gene. Gs␣ protein activity In heparinized blood samples the activity of Gs␣ protein from erythrocyte membranes of the patients was analyzed in vitro adapted to the method of Levine et al. (29) as previously described (30). Briefly, after solubilization and activation of the Gs protein with GTP␥S the generation of cAMP using adenylyl cyclase from turkey red cell membranes in presence of ATP was measured by RIA (Immuno Biological Labo- 4630 Ahrens et al. • Analysis of GNAS1 Gene J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2001, 86(10):4630 – 4634 4631 ratories, Hamburg, Germany). Results obtained in triplicate were expressed as per cent of the mean of healthy controls. The normal range was between 85–115%. quencer (ALF express II, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) using Biozym sequencing kit (Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany), according to the directions provided by the manufacturer. Molecular genetic analysis Results Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes by standard procedures. Exons 1–13 of the GNAS1 gene were individually amplified including intron/exon boundaries (except for exon 1) in 10 fragments by PCR using the oligonucleotide primers listed in Table 2. The amplification reactions contained 100 ng of DNA in a final volume of 50 l using 20 pmol of each primer, 200 mol or 2 mmol deoxy (d)NTP (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP), 0.5, or 1 U Taq polymerase (Ampli Taq, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT), 20 mmol Tris (pH 8.4), 1.0 –2.5 mmol magnesium chloride. An initial denaturation at 94 C for 5 min was followed by 34 cycles of annealing at 52⫺72 C for 1 min 30 sec, elongation at 72 C for 2 min, denaturation at 94 C for 1 min 15 sec, and final elongation at 72 C for 5 min. Amplification products were between 141 and 381 bp long (Table 2). To generate shorter fragments for further analysis, fragment containing exon 4/5 was digested with the restriction enzyme HaeII to yield two fragments of 150 bp and 230 bp. For mutation screening, a nonisotopic single strand conformation analysis (SSCA) on 5–10% polyacrylamid gels was used as previously described (31). Electrophoretic band shifts were visualized by silver staining, and DNA samples with an aberrant migration pattern were reamplified from genomic DNA and directly sequenced. Direct sequence analysis of DNA was performed with CY5-labeled primers in sense and antisense direction analyzed in an automatic se- All 29 unrelated patients and the 16 investigated relatives with AHO showed a reduced Gs␣ protein activity compared with healthy controls (range between 41 and 75%, mean 59%; Table 1). For 21 patients and 14 relatives, SSCA analysis revealed the presence of an aberrant migration pattern in one of the fragments of GNAS1 leading to direct DNA sequence analysis. In eight families, SSCA molecular genetic abnormalities were not detected. Performing DNA sequence analysis Fifteen different mutations including 11 novel mutations were found consisting of nine missense, four frameshift, one splice site mutation and one in-frame deletion (Table 1). Patient (P) 1 showed an insertion of adenine in codon 51 of exon 2 of GNAS1. For P 2–5, mutations were revealed in exon 4 of GNAS1: P2 had a cytosine to thymine transversion TABLE 1. Diagnosis and results of the determination of Gs␣ protein activity and the molecular genetic analysis of GNAS1 of 29 patients (P) and their relatives [mother (M), sister (S), brother (B)] with AHO Patient Diagnosis P1/M1 P2/M2 P3/M3 P4/M4 P5/M5 P6 P7/M7/S7 P8 –13 Ia/PPHP Ia/PPHP Ia/PPHP Ia/PPHP Ia/PPHP Ia Ia/PPHP/Ia Ia M8/11/12 B13 P14 P15–16 P17 P18/M18 P19/M19 P20 P21 P22/M22/B22 P23/M23 P24 –29 PPHP/Ia (M12) Ia PPHP Ia/Ia Ia Ia/PPHP Ia PPHP Ia Ia/PPHP/Ia Ia/PPHP Ia (24 –28) PPHP (29) Gs␣ protein activity (%) 69/59 67/66 54/55 54/58 57/68 59 64/73/58 44/71/56 56/49/73 60/75/58 60 58 48/49 56 55/61 47/70 68 44 56/48/50 68/48 56/41/59 54/61/56 Exon Codon 2 4 4 5 5 6 I6/E7 7 51 102 102 115 140 165 9 11 11 11 12 13 13 231 298 299 313 336 357 377 189/190 Nucleotide sequence Amino acid change insertion A (GAA TCT3 GAAATC) GCG3 GTG GCG3 GAG CCC3 CTC insertion T (TTT GAC3 TTTTGA) CGC3 TGC splice site mutation (ag C TTC3gg C TTC) 4 bp deletion (⌬ GACT) stop codon 53 Ala3 Val Ala3 Gln Pro3 Leu stop codon 141 Arg3 Cys CGC3 TGC GCT3 CCT insertion A (GAG3 GAAG) CCA3 CTA CGG3 TGG CAC3 CTC 3 bp deletion (⌬ AAC) no mutation no mutation no mutation Arg3 Cys Ala3 Pro stop codon 309 Pro3 Leu Arg3 Trp His3 Leu ⌬ Asn stop codon 202 TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide primers used to amplify the 13 exons of GNAS1 Exon Fragment size (bp) Annealing temperature (C) Upstream primer Downstream primer 1 2 3 4/5 6 7/8 9/10 11 12 13 141 176 238 381 217 345 347 212 293 322 70 61 54 54 57 61 72 62 53 52 5⬘-CCG-CCA-TGG-GCT-GCC-TCG-GGA-A-3⬘ 5⬘-CAG-ACC-TCC-CTG-CCC-AAA-GTG-3⬘ 5⬘-GGC-GCG-CGA-ATT-GTT-GCT-TT-3⬘ 5⬘-TAC-TCC-TAA-CTG-ACA-TGG-TG-3⬘ 5⬘-CAT-AGG-GAA-CTC-TGG-TCT-CA-3⬘ 5⬘-GCG-CTG-TGA-ACA-CCC-CAC-GTG-TCT-3⬘ 5⬘-CTC-TGG-AAT-AAC-CAG-CTG-TCC-TC-3⬘ 5⬘-CCT-GGC-CGA-AAG-CGC-GCT-TCT-3⬘ 5⬘-GGA-GCT-ACA-GAG-ATG-CTA-GC-3⬘ 5⬘-TGG-ATT-TGA-GCT-CTT-TGC-GC-3⬘ 5⬘-CCC-GCC-CGC-CCT-TAC-CCA-GCA-3⬘ 5⬘-TTA-CTT-GGT-GCC-CCC-CTG-CA-3⬘ 5⬘-CAG-TTT-CCC-AGT-ATG-ATC-TT-3⬘ 5⬘-ATA-TGG-ACA-CTG-TGC-TCA-GG-3⬘ 5⬘-GAT-GGG-TTG-GGT-GGC-GGT-TA-3⬘ 5⬘-GAA-ACC-ATG-ATC-TCT-GTT-AT-3⬘ 5⬘-CGC-AGG-GGG-TGG-GCG-GTC-ACT-CCA-3⬘ 5⬘-AGC-CAG-CAA-GAG-TGG-AAG-CC-3⬘ 5⬘-AGT-AAA-TTT-ACA-TCC-ATG-AGA-3⬘ 5⬘-TAA-TTA-AAT-TTG-GGG-GTT-CC-3⬘ 4632 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2001, 86(10):4630 – 4634 mutation in codon 102 resulting in a substitution of alanine by valine. In the same position of exon 4P3 showed a different missense mutation leading to the substitution of alanine by glutamine. For P 4 and 5, mutations in exon 5 were detected (P 4: Pro3 Leu 115, described before by de Sanctis et al. (23); P 5: insertion of thymine in codon 140 initiating a stop in codon 141). P 6 showed a single base substitution from cytosine to thymine in codon 165 of exon 6, which has been previously described for another kindred by Miric et al. (11), resulting in an arginine to cysteine change. A splice site mutation (intron 6/exon 7) occurred in P 7 (Fig. 1). The previously known 4 bp deletion (10, 18, 22, 27, 28) involving codons 189 and 190 of exon 7 followed by a frameshift with a premature stop at codon 202 was observed in P 8 –13. P 14 showed a missense mutation in the GTP-dependent conformational change domain encoded by exon 9 (Arg3 Cys 231). Three different novel mutations were detected in exon 11 (Ala3 Pro 298 identified in 2 unrelated patients (P 15 and 16); additional adenine inserted in codon 299 initiating a stop in codon 309 in P 17; Pro3 Leu 313 in P 18). P 19 had a cytosine to thymine transversion mutation resulting in a substitution of arginine to tryptophane in codon 336 of exon 12, identified for another unrelated patient by de Sanctis et al. (21). Finally, two different mutations were found in exon 13 (His3 Leu 357 in P 20; 3-bp deletion in codon 377 (Asn) causing an in-frame mutation in P 21). The affected family members of the 21 patients showed the same mutations as their relatives (Table 1). Discussion In the present study, we identified 15 different mutations in the GNAS1 gene (Fig. 2) investigating a collective of 29 patients with AHO from different families and 16 affected FIG. 1. Family investigation of patient 7. Beside the patient her mother and one sister show physical features of AHO, the father and two other siblings are not affected. Determination of Gs␣ protein activity revealed a reduced activity for all three family members with AHO. PCR-SSCA showed an aberrant migration pattern compared with the healthy relatives. Performing direct sequence analysis of DNA a splice site mutation (intron 6/exon 7) with a single base substitution from adenine to guanine was detected for patient 7 and her affected family members. Filled symbols, PHP Ia; hatched symbol, PPHP; open symbols, unaffected. Ahrens et al. • Analysis of GNAS1 Gene family members. To our knowledge 11 of these mutations including six missense, three frameshift, one splice site mutation and one in-frame deletion have not been described up to now. These results underscore the genetic heterogeneity of AHO. The investigated affected family members included 12 unrelated mothers with AHO and PPHP and one mother with PHP Ia. Interestingly, in every case the children developed a PHP Ia, if they inherited the mutation from their mother. This result supports the hypothesis of a genomic imprinting for this disorder. It is believed that Gs␣ is expressed in certain tissues only from the maternal allele (32). Therefore, mutations of the active maternal allele lead to a decreased Gs␣ expression and to hormone resistance whereas mutations on the inactive paternal allele have no effect. All patients and their affected relatives showed a reduced Gs␣ protein activity. In eight families GNAS1 mutations were not detected. We believe in accordance with a previous study (18) that in these cases the genetic defect may be located outside the coding region rather in the promoter region of GNAS1 or in other regulatory regions leading to Gs␣ deficiency. In the other 21 investigated patients from different families with novel or known mutations in GNAS1, no second mutation was identified in the gene. Therefore, we conclude following Miric et al. (11) that the described mutations are responsible for the reduced Gs␣ activity. In five unrelated children with AHO and PHP Ia and three mothers with either PPHP or PHP Ia, the previously described 4-bp deletion in exon 7 was detected. This result was confirmed by the repetition of the molecular analysis of GNAS1 of two brothers (P 13, B 13) who had initially been described by Nakamoto et al. (24) to carry the same deletion. Except for this hot spot for loss of function mutations in GNAS1, only three other mutations located in exon 1 (Met3 Val 1; 8, 25), exon 5 (Pro3 Ser 115; 18, 25) and exon 13 (Ala3 Ser 366; 12) have been identified so far in more than one kindred. This study adds now four different single base substitution mutations occurring in more than one unrelated patient. The missense mutation in exon 5 resulting in a proline to leucine change in codon 115 has been described before by de Sanctis et al. (23). A different missense mutation (Pro3 Ser 115) has been detected in the same location in exon 5 in unrelated patients by Ahmed et al. (18) and Aldred and Trembath (25). The substitution of arginine by cysteine in codon 165 of exon 6 found in one girl with AHO and PHP Ia has been noticed by Miric et al. (11) for a mother and her daughter with PHP Ia. Moreover, we report two unrelated patients with the identical mutation in exon 11 leading to a change of alanine to proline in codon 298. The substitution of proline in other proteins is known to be often followed by the synthesis of unstable proteins (11). The fourth missense mutation in codon 336 of exon 12 resulting in the substitution of arginine by tryptophane was found in a patient with AHO and PHP Ia and his mother with PPHP. It has been identically described as a de novo mutation in an Italian patient with PHP Ia (21). We conclude that molecular genetic analysis of a large number of patients from different kindreds with AHO may lead to the identification of additional mutational hot spots for inactivating mutations in GNAS1. Several of the novel mutations are located in exons known Ahrens et al. • Analysis of GNAS1 Gene J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2001, 86(10):4630 – 4634 4633 FIG. 2. Schematic representation of GNAS1 with the location of 15 mutations detected in patients with AHO by the present study. Reference numbers of the mutations described previously are set in parentheses. to encode for different activity domains of GNAS1. Farfel et al. (15) and Iiri et al. (26) described a mutation found in codon 231 of exon 9 that substitutes arginine by histidine leading to a disturbance of the interaction between the switch 2 and 3 regions of Gs␣, which are necessary to stabilize the active conformation. We discovered in the same location in exon 9 a different missense mutation resulting in an arginine to cysteine change. Interestingly, we were able to characterize the molecular defect in only 21 of 29 patients with reduced Gs␣ activity. This may be due to technical reasons. SSCA is a widely used screening technique for the identification of unknown single nucleotide variations in short DNA fragments. In the approach we took, the analyzed fragments were shorter than 350 bp, in the majority even shorter than 300 bp. It has been demonstrated that the sensitivity of SSCA to identify a single nucleotide variation should be more than 80% in fragments of this size (33). Thus, if all patients with reduced Gs␣ activity really have a molecular defect in one of the exons investigated, our yield should have been higher to detect these abnormalities. So it has to be postulated that in some cases of AHO with reduced Gs␣ activity, the molecular defect may be outside of the coding region covering exons 1 to 13 of the GNAS1 gene. The diagnosis of AHO during childhood is often difficult because phenotypic signs as brachydactyly, short stature, and mental retardation and hormone resistance develop over the first years of life and show a variety in their expression. Gs␣ protein activity and the molecular genetic analysis of GNAS1 proved to be important parameters for an early diagnosis of AHO in affected individuals and also make an investigation of family members possible even before symptoms may occur. Despite the genetic heterogeneity of AHO a phenotype/genotype correlation may be possible for single mutations if molecular analysis is performed in a large collective of patients. In addition a follow up of these patients during childhood is necessary concerning the clinical features until the end of the development of phenotypic signs of AHO. Acknowledgments We are grateful to the Developmental Biology Unit of the Faculty of Medicine, Rouen, France, especially to E. Mallet, J. P. Basuyau, and M. Leroy for introducing the determination of Gs␣ protein activity to us. Furthermore, we thank all corresponding physicians of the investigated families for their cooperation. Received January 10, 2001. Accepted July 5, 2001. Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Wiebke Ahrens, M.D., Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]. This work was presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology in Brussels, Belgium, September 2000. References 1. Albright F, Burnett CH, Smith PH, Parson W 1942 Pseudohypoparathyroidism—an example of “Seabright-Bantam syndrome.” Endocrinology 30: 922–932 2. Davies SJ, Hughes HE 1993 Imprinting in Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 30:101–103 3. Wilson LC, Luttikhuis MEO, Clayton PT, Fraser WD, Trembath RC 1994 Parental origin of Gs␣ gene mutations in Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 31:835– 839 4. Wilson LC, Leverton K, Luttikhuis MEO, et al. 1995 Brachydactyly and mental retardation: an Albright hereditary osteodystrophy-like syndrome localized to 2q37. Am J Hum Genet 56:400 – 407 5. Phelan MC, Rogers RC, Clarkson KB, et al. 1995 Albright hereditary osteodystrophy and del (2) (q37.3) in four unrelated individuals. Am J Med Genet 58:1–7 4634 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2001, 86(10):4630 – 4634 6. Kozasa T, Itoh H, Tsukamoto T, Kaziro Y 1988 Isolation and characterization of the human Gs␣ gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2081–2085 7. Hayward BE, Moran V, Strain L, Bonthron DT 1998 Bidirectional imprinting of a single gene: GNAS1 encodes maternally, paternally, and biallelically derived proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15475–15480 8. Patten JL, Johns DR, Valle D, et al. 1990 Mutation in the gene encoding the stimulatory G protein of adenylate cyclase in Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophie. N Engl J Med 322:1412–1419 9. Weinstein LS, Gejman PV, Friedman E, et al. 1990 Mutations of the Gs ␣ subunit gene in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:8287– 8290 10. Weinstein LS, Gejman PV, de Mazancourt P, American N, Spiegel AM 1992 A heterozygous 4-bp deletion mutation in the gs alpha gene (GNAS1) in a patient with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. Genomics 13:1319 –1321 11. Miric A, Vechio JD, Levine MA 1993 Heterogeneous mutations in the gene encoding the alpha-subunit of the stimulatory G-protein of adenylyl cyclase in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1560 –1568 12. Iiri T, Herzmark P, Nakamoto JM, van Dop C, Bourne HR 1994 Rapid GDP release from Gs alpha in patients with gain and loss of endocrine function. Nature 371:164 –168 13. Luttikhuis ME, Wilson LC, Leonard JV, Trembath RC 1994 Characterization of a de novo 43-bp deletion of the Gs alpha gene (GNAS1) in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. Genomics 21:455– 457 14. Schwindinger WF, Miric A, Zimmerman D, Levine MA 1994 A novel Gs ␣ mutant in a patient with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy uncouples cell surface receptors from adenylyl cyclase. J Biol Chem 269:25387–25391 15. Farfel Z, Iiri T, Shapira H, Roitman A, Mouallem M, Bourne HR 1996 Pseudohypoparathyroidism, a novel mutation in the ␥-contact region of Gs␣ impairs receptor stimulation. J Biol Chem 271:19653–19655 16. Shapira H, Mouallem M, Shapiro MS, Weisman Y, Farfel Z 1996 Pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia: two new heterozygous frameshift mutations in exon 5 and 10 of the Gs alpha gene. Hum Genet 97:73–75 17. Warner DR, Gejman PV, Collins RM, Weinstein LS 1997 A novel mutation adjacent to the switch III domain of G(S ␣) in a patient with pseudohypoparathyroidism. Mol Endocrinol 11:1718 –1727 18. Ahmed SF, Dixon PH, Bonthron DT, et al. 1998 GNAS1 mutational analysis in pseudohypoparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol 49:525–531 19. Fischer JA, Egert F, Werder E, Born W 1998 An inherited mutation associated with functional deficiency of the ␣-subunit of the guanine nucleotide binding protein Gs in pseudo- and pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:935–938 Ahrens et al. • Analysis of GNAS1 Gene 20. Yu D, Shuhua Y, Schuster V, et al. 1999 Identification of two novel deletion mutations within the Gs␣ gene (GNAS1) in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3254 –3259 21. De Sanctis L, Buzi F, Scire G, Romagnolo D, Lala R, de Sanctis C 2000 GNAS1 mutational analysis in 8 Italian Albright hereditary osteodystrophy patients: identification of 2 novel mutations. Horm Res 53(Suppl 2):P3– 432 22. Mantovani G, Romoli R, Weber G, et al. 2000 Mutational analysis of GNAS1 in patients with pseudohypoparathyroidism: identification of two novel mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4243– 4248 23. De Sanctis L, Romagnolo D, de Sanctis C, et al. 2000 Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) and pseudohypoparathyroidism: three new mutations and a common deletion in GNAS1. Am J Hum Genet 67(Suppl 2):295 24. Nakamoto JM, Sandstrom AT, Brickman AS, Christenson RA, van Dop C 1998 Pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia from maternal but not paternal transmission of a Gs␣ gene mutation. Am J Med Genet 77:261–267 25. Aldred MA, Trembath RC 2000 Activating and inactivating mutations in the human GNAS1 gene. Hum Mutat 16:183–189 26. Iiri T, Farfel Z, Bourne HR 1997 Conditional activation defect of a human Gs␣ mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 5656 –5661 27. Yu S, Yu D, Hainline BE, et al. 1995 A deletion hot-spot in exon 7 of the Gs alpha gene (GNAS1) in patients with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. Hum Mol Genet 4:2001–2002 28. Yokoyama M, Takeda K, Iyota K, Okabayashi T, Hashimoto K 1996 A 4-base pair deletion mutation of Gs ␣ gene in a Japanese patient with pseudohypoparathyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest 19:236 –241 29. Levine MA, Downs RW, Singer M, Marx SJ, Aurbach GD, Spiegel AM 1980 Deficient activity of guanine nucleotide regulatory protein in erythrocytes from patients with pseudohypoparathyroidism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 94:1319 –1324 30. Marguet C, Mallet E, Basuyau JP, Martin D, Leroy M, Brunelle Ph 1997 Clinical and biological heterogeneity in pseudohypoparathyroidism syndrome. Horm Res 48:120 –130 31. Hiort O, Wodtke A, Struve D, Zöllner A, Sinnecker GH 1994 Detection of point mutations in the androgen receptor gene using non-isotopc single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Hum Mol Genet 3:1163–1166 32. Hayward BE, Barlier A, Korbonits M, et al. 2001 Imprinting of the Gs␣ gene GNAS1 in the pathogenesis of acromegaly. J Clin Invest 107:R31–R36 33. Hayashi K, Yandell DW 1993 How sensitive is PCR-SSCP? Hum Mutat 2: 338 –346
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz