Pharma&Biotech Flexible Bioreactor Facility Design from Pilot to cGMP Manufacturing IBC’s Flexible Facilities, April 2-4 2013, San Francisco David Valentine MSAT) / Lonza, Slough UK Elise-marie Seng(Principle / , Basel Scientist, / 10. Mai 2012 Contents Lonza Overview Current Flexibility in Stainless Steel (example for context) Slough Site Vision, Manufacturing Excellence and PfQC Technology Transformation Plan and Site History of SUBs Cell Culture Platform Processes (sets design requirements) Case Study: A Fit-to-Process and Modular Single Use Bioreactor System Installed in Pilot Plant Next Steps and Summary Lonza Overview Life sciences driven company Headquartered in Basel (Switzerland) Sales of CHF 3.925 billion in 2012 Global operations: Global leader in microbial control and custom manufacturing: 45 major production and R&D sites Employs over 10,000 people Hygiene Water treatment Active pharmaceutical ingredients both chemical and biological Cell therapy Leading positions in product market niches: Endotoxin detection Cell-based research products Nutrition ingredients Performance intermediates Lonza Biologics - Mammalian Production Capacity (>250,000L Globally) Slough, UK Portsmouth, NH Porriño, SP 200 – 2,000L Capacity Tuas, Singapore 5,000 – 20,000L Capacity 10,000L Capacity 200 - 20,000L Capacity Stainless Steel Plant Context – Flexible at 200L to 20kL GMP scale! Singapore 2 (operational in early 2011) labeled as 20kL but has been designed with an ability to harvest and purify: 2 x 200L (seed bioreactor as independent production system) 2 x 1kL (seed bioreactor as independent production system) 4 x 5kL (seed bioreactor as independent production system –up to 20g/L) 4 x 20kL (standard full volume of production bioreactor – up to 5g/L) Stainless Steel Plant Context – Flexible at the pilot scale! Pilot mimics GMP Production across all sites Evolved across history of Lonza mammalian bioreactor types Airlift Stirred tank Adaptable primary recovery to fit scale and separation challenges Established data set on process transfer and scale-up supports interchangeability of bioreactor types Slough, UK – Biologics Centre of Excellence Site Profile Mammalian Biologics Centre of Excellence Process Development Technology Development Analytical Services Scale-up and transfer Clinical and commercial GMP production Manufacturing History cGMP since 1983, expanded 1986 and 1994 (re-developed and upgraded 2012) Multi-product (antibodies and therapeutic proteins) ~30 products per year 10-15 new products per year Pipeline to feed large scale plants FDA, MHRA and PMDA approved 200L ALR 500L STR 800L STR 1000L SUB 2000L ALR 3 x DSP Slough Vision “To consistently deliver value and excellence in the eyes of the customer” Where excellence is a highly desired state achieved through… understanding customer needs through a strong collaborative project management approach leveraging our accumulated scientific and technological experience and wisdom a demonstrated track record of technology leadership and scientific integrity recognition from our employees that Slough is a great place to work continuously being driven toward flawless execution such that our operational performance yields sustainable competitive advantage responsibility and accountability being readily accepted at all levels a systematic approach to managing our processes at cost levels that make us competitive and profitable to sustain our business Mammalian Biologics GMP Facility – Upgraded 2012 Product Lifecycle – The Systems View 2 1 Voice of the Customer Voice of the Scientist •CQA/TPP •Process experience •Yield requirements •Regulatory expectations •Translating VOC •Experience (platform) •Design and development •Scientific solution Processes Operate ‘on target minimum variation’ 3 4 Voice of the Process •Daily Process Control •Process understanding – technical/operational •Process capability Voice of the GMP Plant •NOR •Equipment capability •Asset age/replacement •New technology Development, Improvement and Control of the Manufacturing System dFMEA • • • • • Audit ‘as is’ process step Go to Gemba Actions Parameter Name Notes Effects of failure mode Severity Low No impact expected 1 High Decreases flux and increases processing time, could affect PQ (increase aggs) Low No failure mode Occurrence Detectability RPN Comments/recommendations for other studies (any known edge of failures) Parameter Designation Millipore Biomax or Pall 30KD Ultrafiltration Cassettes Cassettes Membrane loading (g product/m2 ) 1 1 1 Process characterisarion studies to be performed, no spec in PPD currently 9 3 5 135 N/A N/A N/A N/A Membrane lifetime High May Impact yield and cycle time Low 5 1 1 5 Not a failure mode N/A N/A N/A N/A High No impact expected 5 1 1 5 Low Low risk to product, may slow down processing 3 3 5 45 High Presents product risk 3 3 5 45 Low Not a failure mode N/A N/A N/A N/A High low impact 1 1 1 1 Membrane lifetime (storage) Immediate Risk Mitigations Short Term Projects Long Term Projects Investment Projects New Technology Projects Membrane lifetime studies NWP test pre and post use. 12 month shelf. Expectation is that filter would be replaced if it doesn't pass NWP. Severity would not impact product quality but ,ay impact process step performance. Cassettes given 12 month expiry upon first use, however NWP test is completed pre and post each UF/DF.Cassettes stored in 0.1M naOH, supported by validated storage study occurrence rating will be site dependent Production Area Temperature WFI Flush Conductivity of permeate following WFI flush NWP (Normalized Water Permeability Following it with equil buffer so severity is lowered. Low Failure High Not a failure mode 5 1 1 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A >80% discard membranes when fail NWP System Equilibration Buffer Type Low System not fully equilibrated High Not a failure mode Low 3 1 1 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A System not fully equilibrated 3 1 1 3 High System not fully equilibrated 3 1 1 3 Low System not fully equilibrated 3 1 1 3 High System not fully equilibrated 3 1 1 3 Equilibration buffer volume System equilibration conductivity System equilibration pH Detailed Control Plan Process Flow Chart Material Preparation Request Raw Materials Inputs • • • • POD Kit Disp Kit Deviations ‘Just do it’ employee suggestions Engineering work orders Clinic cases - ‘Things stopped us executing perfectly on time’ Generate New Documents Operation Sub-Operation Process Harvest Tank/Pallet Truck Flowmeter and equipment Checks Flowmeters Check Raw materials and Documents BR Prereq Checks Flowmeter setup Control Causes - Xs Send sheet to tech services Measure Control Results - Ys Is there a gap? (yes/no) Key Resp Measurement/Evalu ation Method Sample Frequency Sampling Size Analysis of Output Action if out of Control na na none USP supervisor na every batch na none reactive request to TS nc no na na no USP supervisor na every batch na none reactive request to TS nc no Process outputs TS aknowledge reciept Receipt of spreadsheet yes/no email to fermentation USP and MST check kit vs excel request form and BR and sign. Check for differences kit vs spreadsheet yes signed form no control no na MST supervisor Visual every batch 100% Inspection none contact USP nc must match MST and USP Operator visual Every batch 100% Inspection none make comment supply missing items nc no USP operator na every batch na none reactive collection of kit nc nc nc no na no control no na na no Disp Operator na every batch 100% Inspection none reactive collection of kit from disp no control no na na no USP operator na every batch <100% Inspection none request missing items from disp Issues docs and get on plant check for docs on plant yes presence of docs on plant no docs on plant USP operator visual every batch 100% Inspection none reactive receipt of docs nc Colate documation at point of use no control no na no no USP operator na every batch na none move documents to point to use nc Pod kits on plant and check BR check for kit on plant yes presence of kits on plant no kit on plant USP operator visual every batch 100% Inspection none reactive request of kits nc Dispensary kit on plant and check BR check for kit on plant yes presence of kits on plant no kit on plant USP operator visual every batch 100% Inspection none reactive request of kits nc nc nc Collect pallet truck no control no na no no USP operator na every batch na none reactive collection of pallet truck Collect Stedim Tanks no control no na no no USP operator na every batch na none reactive collection of stedim Ice collected and present in 70 Freezer Check sample bags are attached to fermenter check for ice in freezer check for sample bags Check containers are available for decon no control yes Check integrity test unit is available and working no control Select Apropriate flow meters presence of ice in freezer presence of sample bags yes no ice in freezer USP operator visual every batch 100% Inspection none reactive collect ice nc no Sample bags on reactor USP operator visual every batch 100% Inspection none reactive attach samlpe bags nc presence of containers no containers on plant USP operator na every batch na none reactive collection of containers nc yes Presence of working tester on plant no tester on plant USP operator na every batch na none reactive collection of tester nc no control no appropriate flow meter selected no no USP operator na every batch na none unknowningly operating outside of calibrated range c Label date in date USP operator visual every batch 100% Inspection none obtain equipment within expiry nc yes Manual Clean of WFI flow meter Equipment Checks check expiry of raw materials and clean/sanitised equipment pFMEA Process or Product Name: Develop Daily Control Plan Location of Control Criticality of Control ( C ). Is this a Key Process Step Specification none Collect (move to hall) tech sevices harvest kit -1to2 days prior to harvest Disp deliver kit to the USP ops 1 to 2 days pripr to harvest. USP ops official check of part number against BR Normal GMP Operational Experience Measure No control No control Process variables No defined trigger to submit request Complete TS excel spreadsheet from BR - Area Supervisor Pre-requisite activities Daily Clinic Review of Performance Failure mode UF/DF General Operating Variables FMEA Date (Orig) FMEA Review Process Process Stage Process Step or Product Part Check Avaiability of Raws and Equipment Check tubing available Potential Failure Mode S E V Potential Failure Effects O C C Potential Cause(s) of Failure D E T Current Controls R P N Actions Recommended Area Resp. Check for measuring cylinder Check availabilty of correct sized pump Check for availabilty of appropriate timer check for mixer base in facility when eluting in to Nalgene check for levtech charging unit in facility when eluting in to Nalgene Ensure Levtech unit is on charge 1hr pre-use Perform test of LevTech Check availabilty of pH down buffer Leave facility Pick tubing from Kanban Tubing not available Pick measuring cylinder from 1st floor clean equip prep room Measuring cylinder not available Stop Process 6 Unable to autoclave tubing Stop Process 6 Available tubing not suitable 1 Pump Calibration Buffer not available Return to facility check required flow rate of Not checked titrant (down) N/A KanBan 6 36 None - as we have a second autoclave KanBan procedure 6 36 None - procedures are acceptable 6 6 No tubing in MST No tubing in stores 1 1 MST Operator SAP 6 1 36 6 6 No tubing at supplier 1 SAP 6 36 None - as we have dual suppliers for tubing Different calibration procedure 4 Available cylinders are not suitable 4 Not aware of controls 6 96 Determine if a stocking policy is available and set into KanBan system MST Colin Stretch 6 Buffer not made 6 Buffer make up spreadsheet 6 216 Review effectiveness of new buffer supply system and improve if required DSP Donal O'Grady Stop Process 6 Buffer not suitable 4 Buffer documentation BRs 6 144 Review effectiveness of new buffer supply system and improve if required DSP Donal O'Grady 1 Operator distracted 1 In the BR 6 6 6 Operator distracted 1 In the BR 6 36 1 4 Pick the wrong measuring cylinder There are no cylinders available in MST 1 Procedure in SOP for flowrate 6 6 1 Not aware of controls 6 24 0 Incorrect flowate used too low Incorrect flowate used too high Unwrap tubing, using full length Remove autoclave label and add to BR Attach tubing to buffer None - procedures are acceptable Stop Process Modify calibration procedure Different calibration procedure Pick up buffers from buffer prep area/storage area/transfer hatch 1 Stop Process Stop Process Stop Process 0 Add tubing to pump head 0 Set pump speed Prime tubing at maximum speed clamp off tubing when full of buffer 0 0 0 Completion Date Priming Buffer non-KPP 1. Buffer is tested prior to release for production. Buffers not meeting criteria for pH / conductivity cannot be released for production use. 2. Following equilibration, processing cannot continue unless system effluent meets the specified pH and conductivity ranges. 3. Equlilibration of the system can be repeated to ensure that the system conditions are acheived prior to introducing the process stream to the system. non-KPP 1. Buffer is tested prior to release for production. Buffers not meeting criteria for pH / conductivity cannot be released for production use. 2. Following equilibration, processing cannot continue unless system effluent meets the specified pH and conductivity ranges. 3. Equlilibration of the system can be repeated to ensure that the system conditions are acheived prior to introducing the process stream to the system. non-KPP Planning for Quality and Control Slough Site Vision - “To consistently deliver value and excellence in the eyes of the customer” We achieve this through…. •leveraging our accumulated scientific and technological experience and wisdom •having a profound understanding of cause and effect relationships •designing processes for manufacturability •optimising processes at cost levels that protect competitiveness and sustain profitability •subjecting our processes to continuous improvement •aligning the Technology Strategy with Process Development and the Asset Lifecycle Management Plan •Demonstrating a track record of scientific integrity and technological innovation New Technology Across the Manufacturing Process Aligned to our Transformation plan SUB Timeline: Track Record of Market Launch vs. Lonza Interest 250L SUB MARKET LAUNCH: 200L Wave Latest TruBioDV Dual Controller / Bag re-design 1000L SUB 50L SUB 20L Wave 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 S20 Wave Bioreactor LONZA INTEREST: S200 Wave Bioreactor 50L SUB (Pilot) 250L SUB (Pilot) 1000L SUB (Pilot) LONZA has track record of evaluating and implementing latest SUB technology shortly after market launch 1000L SUB (GMP) Dual 50/250/ 500L (Pilot) Summary of SUB Evaluation (2007) Requirement Comparable cell growth Comparable productivity Comparable metabolic profiles (glucose, lactate, glutamine, ammonia) Scale-up consistency mixing k La process control system integration between single-use and stainless steel Comparable Product Quality Result Continuous Improvement of The GS System™ Year Improvement 1992 The GS System™ Introduced 2001 pCON Vectors Introduced 2003 Launch of CHOK1SV Cell Line 2006 GS-CHO Protein-free Process (Version 6 media platform) 2006 pConPlus Vectors for Antibodies 2009 GS-CHO Chemically Defined Animal Component-free (CDACF) Version 7 Media Platform 2009 Potelligent® CHOK1SV Cell Line Technology Launched 2011 GS-CHO CDACF Version 8 (v8) Media Platform 2012 GS Xceed™ Gene Expression System Introduced Globally Summary of Processes Process Version 6 (v6) Temperature (°C) pH control Dissolved Oxygen Tension (%) Medium Version 7 (v7) Version 8 (v8) 36.5 Wide pH control boundary Constant pH (narrow control boundary) pH shift (each set point with narrow control boundary) 15 40 40 CD-CHO (LifeTech owned) CD-CHO (LifeTech owned) CM68 (Lonza owned) SF40: Fixed continuous rate Fixed volume Duration: 4-5 days SF50: Continuous feed Variable rate Continued for duration of culture SF70: Continuous feed Variable rate Continued for duration of culture Glucose: Continuous feed Variable rate Continued for duration of culture Glucose: Continuous feed Variable rate Continued for duration of culture SF52, SF53 and SF54: Bolus additions on days 5, 8 and 11 after inoculation SF71, SF72 and SF54: Bolus additions on days 3, 6, 8 and 10 after inoculation Nutrient Feeds SF41: Continuous feed Variable rate according to glucose concentration Case Study: Fit-to-Process Modular Bioreactor System Outputs from Site Technology Transformation Plan Planning for Quality Control (achieving ‘on target minimum variation’) Equipment capability requirements (needs of latest platform processes) Confidence in SUB performance as stepping-stone to larger scale (s/s) Flexible bioreactor volume requirements to best meet customer needs Compact and ergonomic operational space requirements Energy use and environmental impact modelling …have built a strategy that favours single-use systems at the Slough site Fit-to-Process Controller TruBioDV Our choice of process control provider system (Finesse, TruBioDV), is cGMP compliant software also enables rapid user configuration without re-validation needs Speed of implementation has been demonstrated in the pilot facility Sets a precedence for facility installation time and a blueprint for facility re-design The software upgrade to TruBioDV version 4.5 + DeltaV version 11 now enables increased hardware capability as well as miniaturisation of control cart footprint The flexible operation of TWO independent SUBs in parallel, chosen from set of THREE (50L, 250L or 500L shells) fits in a space smaller than ONE 500L stainless steel bioreactor Fit-to-Process Design Compact Equipment Arrangement Design still allows easy access to points where operator interventions needed: • Bag fitting • Sensor connections • Additive set-up • Sampling and process monitoring • Control interface The Modular Pilot SUB System at Installation – Dual Bioreactor, Central Controller System configuration shows 250L (left) and 500L SUB (right) inactive 50L SUB parked behind Fit-to-Process Design Feed Model Standard platform process design for last 4 years requires: Alkali for pH control continuous+ variable feed 1 (glucose) continuous+variable feed 2 (complex) shot 1 (stable in acidic solution) shot 2 (stable in alkali solution) shot 3 (stable in neutral solution) – these 3 shots are chemically incompatible, hence dedicated addition route antifoam 7 inlets for feeds in total +1 for medium fill and inoc (always separated by time) required This “8-inlet port” system is becoming a minimum design standard for Lonza bioreactors (stainless steel included) Fit-to-Process Design Feeding Automation The increased capability includes 7 digital pumps for dedicated addition lines – no interventions once set up ‘2-click’ automation for addition of our platform process shots: Alkali inhibited; correct shot order followed; pre-configured dose volume and time; monitoring of pH limits to pause if edge of acceptable range approached; totalising of quantities added and time outside alarms; ‘parallel charge’ option also available Automation has enabled error reduction and improved consistency Single-Use Sensors Benefits Single-use sensors fits the concept of single-use bioreactors Overall cost of single-use sensor comparable to conventional Facility turn-around time reduced by 2 days per run Elimination of: leaks autoclaving cleaning validation drifting mid-run sensors fails Performance evaluation against conventional electrochemical sensors is currently in progress using the pilot SUB system Cell Culture Process Control Dissolved Oxygen 100 90 80 DOT (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 Elapsed Time (h) TruFluor (control) ReUseable 312 336 360 Cell Culture Process Control pH 7.30 7.20 7.10 pH 7.00 6.90 6.80 6.70 (no daily adjustments to single-use sensor) 6.60 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 Elapsed Time (h) ReUsable TruFluor Bench pH 264 288 312 336 360 Fit-to-Process Design: More Controller Capability Standard 6 digital mass flow valves allows variety of gassing strategies to be easily configurable Triple DOT and pH inputs future-proof these key parameters (Triple is temporary - once optimal type chosen; revert back to dual) pCO2 levels in this design of SUB have proved to be both beneficial (levels do not get too low), but also detrimental (levels can be higher, potentially supressing peak growth) Jacketed SUBs and stand-alone heater+chiller thermocirculator units remove plant chilled water utility and provide equivalent thermal performance to stainless steel bioreactors Single-use pressure sensor with an accuracy and sensitivity appropriate to a bioprocess bag bioreactor – provides improved early warning against bag pressure issues Fit-to-Process Design: More Controller Capability Remote access via terminal server allows live viewing and controlling of system (from internal LAN, or laptop externally) Allows roaming access to the same level of process control detail as an operator on plant: Enables process experts to conveniently check system details Enables on-call operators to check system alarms prior to travelling to site, and troubleshooting support from experts online Desktop sharing with system administrators or vendor support enables realtime connection, reducing the response time and need for travel for on-site support Generation of data in a compatible format for integration to a plant-wide network, common database, and linking to other ‘smart controller’ systems SUB Pilot Upgrade Project Result: A Synergy of Systems The 3 elements of… Cell Culture Platform Process Design Process Control System Design SUB Bag Design …come together to set the benchmark for system capability The project result has established a standard model that can be quickly replicated, offering flexibly from 25L to 1000L scale Remote access and visibility of real-time and historical data enables process trending and control charting to ensure batch success Batch success rate over first 6 months currently running at 100% Next Pilot Plant Upgrade Project: Install identical controllers on s/s bioreactors Project underway to convert stainless steel 130L ALR and 400L STR to TruBioDV by October 2013 Upgraded process controllers will replace older, nonstandard systems, and also provide capability to connect to a SUB shell, when s/s bioreactor not required enabling universal controller capability This project will realise the concept of a standard process controller which envelops different types and scale of bioreactor – the bioreactor option will be the element that is easily swappable Demonstrating success of new hybrid and flexible operations in the pilot plant justifies and drives change to replicate identical design in future GMP manufacturing bioreactor new-builds or retro-fits Summary: Where are we and where are we going Completing pilot plant SUB and stainless steel upgrades to enable standardised controller and bioreactor system capability, then demonstrate success prior to replication in GMP manufacturing Phased approach for new/retro-fitted equipment aligned to site asset replacement plan and business needs Maintain hybrid and flexible mixture of stainless steel and single-use systems in Slough that are compatible with transferring processes to our largest plants globally Learned that process complexity needs to be managed to ensure benefits of standardisation and process-fit to all plants / all scales are realised Continue our Process for Quality Control as the system to steer operations to perform ‘on target with minimum variation’ and provide data to prioritise the implementation of specific new technologies that enable this Thank you
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz