Mass Transfer and Bioremediation of PAHs in a Bead Mill Bioreactor Ryan Riess PINTER and Associates October 13, 2006 Outline Background Experimental Procedures Mass Transfer experiments Biodegradation experiments Scale up experiments Summary/Conclusions Questions Background Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH’s) are very stable, toxic compounds Most are very hydrophobic, requiring enclosed reactors to ensure minimal stripping losses Associated with oil and gas processing Background PAH contamination in soil is usually free solid particles or as large particles sorbed directly to the organic portion of the soil. PAHs generally have extremely low rates of biodegradation because of low water solubility, high hydrophobicity and low bioavailability Dissolution limited biodegradation Background Background Naphthalene, a simple PAH can be biodegraded in a roller bioreactor using Pseudomonas putida Rate limiting step mass transfer rate This project - economically increase the mass transfer, biodegradation rates in a rotating bioreactor Concentration (mg/L) Typical Biodegradation curve (Black, 1996) 250 Substrate 200 Biomass 150 100 50 0 0 2 4 Time(hours) 6 8 Concentration (mg/L) Mass Transfer Controlled 600 Naphthalene 500 Biomass 400 300 200 100 0 0 20 40 Time (hours) 60 Approach Needed to increase mass transfer rates within bioreactor Explored some different options including faster rotation, different reactor types and baffles within reactor Settled upon addition of inert particles to roller bioreactor Experimental Procedures Experiments were carried out in 1L working volume Temperature: 22-23 °C Pseudomonas putida was used as the candidate bacterium Bioreactor rotated at 50 rpms Analysis carried out on HPLC Mass Transfer Variations Used 3 mm glass beads for loading experiments Did experiments varying initial naphthalene concentrations from 500 mg/L to 10,000 mg/L Used some 1 mm beads, 5 mm beads, and 3 mm Raschig rings for comparison NAPHTHALENE MASS TRANSFER: BEAD LOADING D isso lved N ap h tah len e (m g /L ) 40 Loading 50% 30 25% 20 10% 10 Control 0 0 2 4 6 Time (h) 8 10 Increasing naphthalene concentration 2.5 k L a (1/h) 2 50% Loading 1.5 25% 1 10% 0.5 Control 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Particulate concentration (mg/L) 12000 Naphthalene Concentration in the liquid phase (mg/L) Inert particle size and type 40 C o nt ro l R a s c hig rings 1 m m G la s s be a ds 30 3 m m G la s s be a ds 5 m m G la s s be a ds 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 Time (h) 4 5 Mass Transfer Quantification Ln((CL*-CL)/CL*)=-Klat Where: CL*=saturation concentration of naphthalene (mg/L) CL= concentration of naphthalene (mg/L) Kla= volumetric mass transfer coefficient(1/h) t = time (h) Mass Transfer Quantification Volumetric Mass Transfer coefficients (1/h) Control: 0.06 10% beads: 0.17 25% beads: 0.34 50% beads: 0.52 Mass Transfer Summary Optimum: 5 mm beads, 50% loading Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene 70 hours, 8 hours 212 hours, 28 hours Dimethylnaphthalene 148 hours, 12 hours Biodegradation Procedure Followed literature procedures as closely as possible Increased mass transfer rates demanded more oxygen Total naphthalene concentration Naphthalene Concentration in the liquid phase (m g/L) Biodegradation results naphthalene 600 Control (no beads) 500 25% Loading 50% Loading 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 Time (h) 40 50 Biodegradation methylnaphthalene M eth yl Nap h th alen e (m g /L ) 600 500 400 300 Control 200 100 Optimum BMB 0 0 50 100 Time (h) 150 200 Scale up biodegradation Naphthalene Concentration(mg/L) Scale up biodegradation 600 400 200 0 0 10 20 30 Time(h) 40 50 Toxicity? Experiments performed with brine shrimp 96% alive after two hours – control 89% alive in bioreactor effluent 0% alive in saturated naphthalene solution Biodegradation Summary PAH compound Roller Bioreactor Bead Mill Bioreactor Naphthalene 10.5 118.8 2-Methyl Naphthalene 2.7 22.8 Naphthalene (in mixture) 9.9 98.8 2-Methyl Naphthalene (in mixture) 3.4 31.4 Scale up naphthalene 10.9 148 Literature comparison (Naphthalene) Freely suspended cells, partitioning reactor: Large scale partitioning reactor 85 mg/L-h (Janikowski et. al, 2002) 119 mg/L-h (Daugulis et. al, 2001) Present work (Free cells) 148 mg/L-h Conclusions Î Bead Mill Bioreactor Increases Mass Transfer Î Bioremediation of PAHs Increased Up to Fourteen Fold Î Product of reactor exhibits greatly improved toxicity Applications/Recommendations Treating PAH contaminated water Work with Naphthenic acids Work with PAH contaminated soil Acknowledgements John Headley-Environment Canada Gordon Hill, Mehdi Nemati Questions?
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz