CME/CPD - The hidden intervention: using an effective educational strategy to ensure the uptake of best evidence in practice Guidelines International Network, Seoul, S Korea, August 2011 Dave Davis, MD Senior Director, Continuing Education and Improvement Association of American Medical Colleges Washington DC 1 An outline: many questions, little time… 1. What are CME and CPD? Why are they „invisible‟? 2. The „Does CME Work?‟ question: the in- vitro perspective 3. Does CME work in the real world? - a look at the in-vivo, clinical care gap and its relationship to the world of CPGS 4. So What? Recommendations to a guideline audience (with apologies to my AGREE colleagues) Question #1 Some definitions: • What do we mean by CME & CPD? • ….by the terms diffusion, implementation? • Later….what is knowledge translation/implementation science? 2 What do we mean by ‘CPD and CME’? • educational materials • formal CME: lectures, small groups, courses • outreach visits • opinion leaders • patient-mediated strategies • audit/feedback • reminders (paper, computerized, interactive, etc) • comprehensive, QI- or practice-based interventions • web-based tools, PDAs (borrowed from EPOC, Cochrane Collaboraitve) What do we mean by…? Diffusion: distribution of information and the practitioners‟ natural unaided adoption of policies and practices Dissemination: communication of information to clinicians to improve their skills Implementation: putting a guideline in place, involves effective communication, overcomes barriers by administrative and educational techniques (after Lomas)... 3 Question # 2 “Does CME (CPD) Work?” The In Vitro Question (The Sackett question) • 12 metropolitan areas, roughly 30 conditions studied, >6,000 patient records examined • Substandard care noted in 45% of clinical areas (of this, 46% underuse; 11% overuse) • Little variation by region or by type of condition (chronic, acute), socioeconomic status • Notable gaps in care in depression, alcohol abuse, diabetes care (about 45%), pneumonia (39%); • Better care (>50% compliance with recommendations) noted in hypertension, cardiac care, but just •NOTE: the inviible care gap (undiagnosed, undetected – e.g., smoking cessation, obesity counseling, care gap is HUGE) www.rdrb.utoronto.ca www.rdrb.utoronto.ca 4 1) About educational interventions Changing Physician Performance - a systematic review of the effect of CME strategies JAMA 1995;274:700-705 + The effect of formal CME conferences, symposia, rounds, meetings, lectures Effective Not so Effective • *Interactive Lecturing Didactic Teaching • *Sequenced Sessions One-time only • Accurate needs sessions assessment • Successful education has three elements – predisposing, enabling, reinforcing 5 Other findings… Needs Assessment appear to be important – the more the better (subjective needs, objective, gaps and barrier analysis) No evidence yet about long-term effects (well, some) Group size: no demonstrated effect Effective CME may have predisposing, enabling and reinforcing strategies Knowledge necessary but not sufficient for change Quantitative methodology necessary but not sufficient to understand change NEW Multiple methods‟ effect uncertain; print materials (simple messages) may not be so bad after all; consider the message; and consider the setting 2) and about the learner-clinician • age • motivation • (dis)incentives • experience • time • environment • training • Emphasis on knowledge • Inability to detect needs, evaluate performance • ?self-directed learning • ?critical appraisal The Pathman Model • awareness: of a guideline, practice innovation, change • agreement: with the innovation or guideline • adoption: „trying out‟ the new practice, irregularly • adherence: abiding by the new practice on all appropriate occasions Pathman, 1996 6 Strategizing the delivery of CME: methods for changing provider performance by Pathman stages Methods/ Stages Awareness Agreement Adoption Adherence Predisposing Enabling Reinforcing 3) About the cumulative effect of CCME/CPD 7 Question # 3: Does CME/CPD work in the real world? In the world of effectiveness? Why or why not? The In Vivo Questions The Clinical Care Gap • Overuse • Underuse • Misuse Chassin, 1998 The clinical care gap Ideal, evidence-based practice clinical care gap clinical care gap Current practice 8 NEWSWEEK One Word Can Save Your Life: No! Aug 14, 2011 10:00 AM EDT New research shows how some common tests and procedures aren’t just expensive, but … What causes the gap? The evidence-to-practice puzzle 9 No time… No, Thursday’s out. How about never-is never good for you? “Information management is like having your mouth to a firehose” David Naylor, President, University of Toronto 10 What causes the gap? the educational delivery System and knowledge translation/ implementation science An emerging field; one concept, two terms “Knowledge translation is the effective and timely incorporation of evidence-based information into the practices of health professionals in such a way as to effect optimal health care outcomes and maximize the potential of the health system” – Adapted from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research definition, 2001 Implementation Science is the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other evidence based practice into routine practice thus to improve the quality and effectiveness of health care and services. ..adapted from the NIH, USA 11 Question #4: How do CME and CPD play a role in clinical practice guidelines? The guideline process: evidence-toaction „Consideration of clinician learning style, needs The goal: effective implementation Effective CME/PD 12 How an we use CME/CPD in guideline development (and adaptation)? Recommendation #1: Guideline Development/adaptation Consider CME/CPD in any evidence development process: from learner and educational perspectives (for example, guard against knowledge overload, consider already-held knowledge) a. secure buy-in; involve the end-user in guideline development/adaptation b. employ adult learning principles in guideline statements (format, spacing, language) c. consider recommending effective educational strategies in the guideline itself ….educational issues to consider within the guideline, evidence itself • • • • • • • • compatibility complexity cost relative advantage accessibility format patency of evidence, process of development opportunity; trial-ability 13 One attempt to fix the Message: The Guidelines Advisory Committee, Ontario (now the Center for Evidence-based practice) • Joint body of the Ontario Medical Association and the Ministry of Health and Long term Care, Ontario • Chooses a topic area; reviews all guidelines in that area; scores them by the Cluzeau/AGREE instrument • Mounted them on a website – – – – – Quick, 30 second synopsis Clear language Appropriate format Parallel patient synopsis The apple-score How an we use CME/CPD in guideline implementation? Recommendation # 2: Include CME/CPD in any guideline implementation strategy a) Consider the learner - mode of current learning - stage of awareness-adherence at which clinicianlearners exist b) Consider effective educational strategies 14 How can we use CME/CPD in guideline implementation? Recommendation # 3: Consider CME/CPD in a staged fashion, depending on stage of adoption of information, by individuals, groups; use appropriate educational strategies The CPG implementation toolkit Formal CME Lectures, workshops, small groups M&M conferences Informal education Journal Club Audit/Feedback Team training Reminders Handover/off rounds Quality-based rounds Policy, CQI administrative techniques Print Patient Strategies Multiple Strategies 15 Examples of strategizing the delivery of CME: changing provider performance, Pathman-PROCEED Methods/Stages Predisposing Enabling Reinforcing Awareness Print material, Lectures, Conferences Academic detailing, Media Agreement Adoption Adherence Interactive sequential sessions Small groups, opinion leaders Pt. education, workshops, opinion leaders Reminders, audit/feedback Reminders, audit/feedback An implementation project of the Association of American Medical Colleges www.aamc.org/bestpractices • Launch, June 2011 • Tools, resources, and support for AAMC members • Collaborative learning sessions • National Faculty Development Initiative • Roughly 250 med schools & teaching hospitals participating 16 Participating medical schools and teaching hospitals have committed to: • Teach quality and patient safety to the next generation of doctors • Ensure safer surgery through use of surgical checklists • Reduce infections from central lines using proven protocols • Reduce hospital readmissions for high-risk patients • Research, evaluate, and share new and improved practices. This list of commitments will grow over time. The Pathman-PROCEED model applied to AAMC’s BPBC campaign Methods/Stages Awareness Predisposing Emails, Conferences, Media Enabling Reinforcing Agreement Adoption Adherence Group work at meetings, conference calls Learning collaboratives, workshops, Web-tools, webinars Reminders, audit/feedback, Awards Reminders, audit/feedback 17 And a few final last words • Large and growing body of evidence about the effect of CME/CPD now imbedded in models of change- no longer an invisible (and ineffective) intervention • Huge clinical care gap • Considerable support for consideration of CME/CPD practices and principles – based on best evidence – in CPG development, adaptation and implementation Dave‟s contact info: [email protected] www.aamc.org/initiatives/CME/ae4Q www.utoronto.ca/rdrb 18
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz