Problem 1 Known: Dimensions and properties of a cup containing hot coffee as well as outside thermal conditions Unknown: 1. Applicability of LTCM 2. Initial rate of heat loss from coffee 3. Time required to cool coffee to 60°C Schematic k2=0.13W/m.K t2 =0.5mm Ho=83mm Hot Coffee ρ=985kg/m3 C=4180J/kg.K Ti=80°C hi=50W/m2.K Lid k1=0.035W/m.K t1 =1.5mm Tsurr=T∞=24°C h0=10W/m.K Do=52mm Large desk TD=24°C kD=0.25W/m.K Assumptions: 1. Constant thermo-physical properties 2. Negligible conduction through the edge of the cup Properties: No additional properties are required Analysis Uniform temperature will exist if Bi<0.1, the heat is lost from coffee through Lid, Side walls and Bottom of the cup. These heat transfer processes occur in parallel to each other and each can be characterized by a different Bi# In general Bi = internal resistance (heat transfer within the coffee cup) external resistance (from inner surface of the cup to surroundings) i) Consider the lid Because of assumption 2, we ignore the edges, so that one can use internal or external dimensions of the cup or the average of them. In this solution we will use internal dimensions of the cup. BiHeat loss through lead = 1 / hi Ai = 1 / hi t2 1 t2 1 + + k2 Ai ho Ai k2 ho 1 / 50 = 0.0005 1 + 0.13 10 = 0.196 > 0.1 So LTCM is not applicable for heat loss through the lid Consider side wall 1 1 / hi Ai 1 / hi 2πri Li 50 * 0.0245 BiHeat loss t side wall = = = ln(ro / ri ) ln(ro / ri ) ln(26 / 24.5) 1 1 1 + + + 0.035 10 * 0.0245 2πk1 Li ho Ai ho 2πri Li 2πk1 Li = 0.141 > 0.1 Also for heat loss through the side wall LTCM is not quite applicable Consider bottom of the cup 1 / hi Ai 1 / 50 ⋅ π ⋅ 0.0245 BiHeat loss t bottom = = 0.0015 1 t1 1 + + k1 Ai k D S 0.035 ⋅ π ⋅ 0.0245 0.25 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 0.0245 = 0.0063 < 0.1 Where S is shape factor for conduction between a disk (bottom of the cup) to semiinfinite media (case 10 in table 4.1) LTCM is applicable Since Bi# in two of three directions is not applicable, the LTCM for the analysis of temp of coffee as a function of time is not applicable. This means that there will be some temp gradient within the coffee at any time during the cooling process. This temp gradient will be largest close to the lid. (the largest Bi#) In order to proceed with the solution for part 2 and 3, we assume that LTCM is applicable for part 2 and 3. ii) Applying energy balance on the coffee dT ρVc = −qlid − q side − qbottom dt T − T∞ T − T∞ T − TD dT = − + + Rt dt R Rt ,bottom t , , lid side ρVc Since T∞=TD the above equation becomes T − T∞ 1 dT 1 1 =− + + dt ρVc Rt ,lid Rt , side Rt ,bottom Where t 1 1 K Rt ,lid = + 2 2 + = 65.68 2 2 W hi πri k 2πri hoπri Rt , side = Rt ,bottom ln(r0 / ri ) K 1 1 + + = 6.60 hi 2πri Li k1 2πLi ho 2πri Li W t 1 1 K = + 1 2 + = 74.15 2 kD S W hi πri k1πri At t = 0, T = Ti = 80°C, 80 − 24 1 1 dT 1 =− + + 2 dt 985 ⋅ 4180 ⋅ π ⋅ 0.0245 ⋅ 0.081 65.68 6.60 74.15 = - 0.016 K/s iii) Since T − T∞ dT dT = − A(T − T∞ ) ⇒ = − Adt ⇒ ln(T − T∞ ) TTi = − At ⇒ t = − ln dt T − T∞ Ti − T∞ Where: A = 1 1 1 1 + + ρVc Rt ,lid Rt , side Rt ,bottom = 2.866 ⋅ 10 − 4 1 s 60 − 24 −4 t = − ln 2.866 ⋅ 10 = 1542s ≈ 26 min 80 − 24 A Problem 2 Known: Initial and final temperatures of a niobium sphere Diameter and properties of the sphere Temperature of surroundings and gas flow and convection coefficient associated with the flow Unknown: 1. Time required to cool the sphere exclusively by radiation 2. Time required to cool the sphere exclusively by convection 3. Combined effects of radiation and convection Schematic: Assumptions: 1. Uniform temperature at any time 2. Negligible effect of holding mechanism on heat transfer 3. Constant properties 4. Radiation exchange is between a small surface and large surrounding Analysis: If cooling is exclusively by radiation, the required time is determined from eq. (5.18) with V = πD 3 / 6, As.r = πD 2 and ε = 0.1 Tsur + T T T + Ti − ln sur + 2 tan −1 ln Tsur − Ti Tsur − T Tsur t= ρVc 3 4εAs ,r σTsur t= 8600 ⋅ 290 ⋅ 0.01 24 ⋅ (0.1) ⋅ 5.67 ⋅ 10 −8 ⋅ 298 3 = 1190s T − tan −1 i Tsur 298 + 573 298 + 1173 573 −1 1173 − ln + 2 tan −1 − tan ln 298 − 1173 298 298 298 − 573 (ε = 0.1) If ε = 0.6, cooling is six times faster, in which case, t=199s If cooling is xexlusively by convection, eq. (5.5) yields ρcD Ti − T∞ 8600 ⋅ 290 ⋅ 0.01 875 = t= ln ln 6h T f − T∞ 1200 275 = 24.1s With both radiation and convection, the temperature history may be obtained from eq. (5.15). dT 4 ρ (πD 3 / 6)c = −πD 2 h(T − T∞ ) + εσ (T 4 − Tsur ) dt Rearrange above equation, yield, dT 4 = − πD 2 h(T − T∞ ) + εσ (T 4 − Tsur ) ρ (πD 3 / 6)c dt [ [ ] ] ρc(πD 3 / 6) 4 4 ∫ 2[ ] dT 1173 πD h(T − T∞ ) + εσ (T − Tsur ) 573 t= Numerically integrating above equation from Ti=1173 at t=0 to T=573, Table Numerical integration results Number of steps (n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 step length h 600 300 200 150 120 100 value of the integral 24.98 20.94 20.05 19.72 19.56 19.48 Error 4.03 0.89 0.33 0.16 0.09 Problem 3 Known: A ball bearing is suddenly immersed in a molten salt bath Heat treatement to harden occurs at locations with T > 1000K Unknown: Time required to harden outer layer of 1mm Total energy required to harden outer layer of 1mm Schematic: Assumptions: 1. One-dimensional radial conduction 2. Constant properties 3. Fo ≥0.2 Analysis: Since any location within the ball whose temperature exceeds 1000K will be hardened the problem is to find the time when the location r=9mm reaches 1000K. then a 1mm outer layer will be hardened. Begin by finding the Biot number. hr 5000 ⋅ 0.01 Bi = o = =1 k 50 Using the one term approximate solution for a sphere, we have 2 T − T∞ θ* = = C1e −ζ 1 Fo ⋅ f1 Ti − T∞ Where f1 = sin(ζ 1 r * ) ζ 1r * This lead to Fo = − 1 ζ1 2 1 ln θ * C1 sin(ζ 1 r * ) * ζ 1r From Table 5.1 with Bi=1, for the sphere find ζ 1 =1.5708 and C1=1.2732. with r* = r/ro = 9/10 = 0.9, substitute numerical values. Fo = 0.441 > 0.2 So one-term approximate is applicable From the definition of the Fourier number with α = k / ρc ro ρc 0.012 ⋅ 7800 ⋅ 500 t = Fo = 0.441 = 3.4s 50 k Note that because of the properties of the ball, Fo = 0.441 corresponds to very short time. 2 2) For a sphere the one-term approximate for the energy loss/gain becomes Φ = 1 − Biθ 0* = 1 − θ 0* = C1e −ζ 2 Fo 3[sin ζ 1 − ζ 1 cos ζ 1 ] ζ1 3 θ 0* 2 = 1.2732e −1.5708 ⋅0.441 = 0.4289 Φ = 0.668 Φ = Q / Q0 ⇒ Q = Φ πD 3 ρc p (T∞ − Ti ) = 10.9 ⋅ 10 3 J 6 Alternatively Φ can be determined graphically using fig D9 For Bi2*Fo = 0.441 and Bi =1 Î Φ =0.67 Which is very close to the value determined one-term approximation approach.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz