A Book of Hours for Sint-Pieters, Ghent (Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26) : A fascinating and complex work Paula L. Pumplin MA-scriptie, Universiteit van Amsterdam Kunstgeschiedenis van de Middeleeuwen Studentnummer: 0610836 26 oktober 2011 Begeleider: Prof. Claudine Chavannes-Mazel Table of contents Introduction State of research The current study Part 1 – Description of UBA, Ms. XXV C 26 Date and localization Script and penwork Decoration Content Illumination Hand A - Master of the Feathery Clouds Hand B - Master of Willem van Bossuyt Hand C - Master of Gerard Brilis Hand D – Maître Y of ÖNB, Cod. 1857? Part 2 – The Hours of the Holy Spirit in XXV C 26 and new iconography of the Virtues The new iconography in the Northern Netherlands French origins of the new iconography The Virtues in the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit in XXV C 26 (f. 22r-24v) Summary and Conclusion Literature consulted Appendix 1 – Codicological description Appendix 2 - Overview of UBA Ms. XXV C 26 Figures 1 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Introduction The Book of Hours that is the subject of this thesis is one of the treasures of the Special Collections of the University of Amsterdam. Produced in Flanders during the second half of the 15th century, its most striking feature is a series of eleven full-page miniatures, seven of which accompany the Hours of the Virgin. The remaining four introduce, respectively, the Seven Penitential Psalms, the Office of the Dead, the Salve regina and the Passion according to John. These miniatures are of such high quality and are accompanied by borders of such great charm and inventiveness that they have been attributed to Lieven van Lathem, one of the foremost Flemish miniaturists of the second half of the 15th century. The manuscript is further richly decorated with 22 column miniatures, 1 two column miniature, 89 historiated initials and border decoration throughout.1 State of research Until recently, there was almost nothing written specifically about XXV C 26. An A4 sheet of handwritten annotations in German by an unknown author is inserted at the back of the manuscript itself. Judging from the paper and handwriting, these annotations were probably made in the second half of the twentieth century. The author distinguishes three hands, dates the manuscript c.1470 and locates it in Ghent or Bruges. There is an entry for the manuscript in the catalogue of a sale held in Amsterdam in 1929 and in the catalogue of an exhibition held at the University Library in Amsterdam in1977.2 George Dogaer first associated the illumination in the manuscript with Lieven van Lathem and finds that the style of XXV C 26 resembles that of four other Books of Hours related to Lieven van Lathem.3 A basic description of XXV C 26 appears in Alexander Willem Byvanck Genootschap, Illuminated manuscripts in Dutch collections : preliminary precursor, part 2-3. The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1993, p. 29-31. The identification of the subjects of the painted decoration and texts in this source was very useful when I was compiling an overview of the manuscript (Appendix 2). Eva Wolf provided a more extensive treatment of XXV C 26 in 1996.4 She included the Amsterdam manuscript in her study of the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (Stuttgart, 1 I first encountered UBA Ms. XXV C 26 during the seminar, Toegepaste handschriftenkunde, offered by Prof. J.A.A.M. Biemans in the spring of 2006. His willingness to share this beautiful Book of Hours with us is indicative of his engaging teaching methods. I got to know the manuscript better during the seminar, Het middeleeuwse boek, offered in the autumn of the same year. The course was team-taught by Prof. Biemans, Prof. C.A. Chavannes-Mazel and Dr. K.M. Rudy of the Koninklijke Bibliotheek. I was part of the “handengroep” whose task it was to sort out and characterize the hands responsible for the illumination. The other members of the group were Ingrid Henkemans (Hand A) and Ellie Verbeek (Hand B). My assignment was Hand C, the artist responsible for the full-page miniatures. I worked closely with Dr. Rudy during this period, and am deeply grateful for her advice and guidance in this matter. When the seminar was over, I realized that there was much more to be learned about the manuscript. As a result, I decided to use it as the subject for my Masters thesis. Dr. K.H. Broekhuijsen gave me much valuable advice at the beginning of my research. I was fortunate to have Prof. Chavannes-Mazel as my thesis advisor. I am profoundly indebted to Prof. James H. Marrow for his willingness to share documentation (including high quality reproductions) relating to the Book of Hours in Saint Petersburg (Hermitage, Graphic arts department, Ms. 6) and his recent insights relating to a Book of Hours in Vienna (ÖNB, S.n. 12908). I am grateful to Klaas van der Hoek for discussing Antonis uten Broec with me. 2 Beumer et al. 1977, p. 12-13 (cat. I-3) and Catalogue 1929, p. 20-21 (lot 41) 3 Dogaer 1987, p. 133. The four Books of Hours are: Madrid, B.N., Ms, Vit. 24-10; Oxford, Bodl. L., Mss. Douce 381, fols. 78-88 + Douce, d. 19, fol. 71v; Oxford, Bodl. L., Ms. Gough Liturg. 15 and Paris, BN, Ms. nouv. acq. lat. 215. See Dogaer 1987, p. 136. 4 Wolf 1996, p. 237-240 (cat. no. 1, as Ms. XV C 26). 2 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Landesbibliothek, Cod.brev.162) because, according to her, Hand B of the Stuttgart manuscript is the same as Hand C in XXV C 26.5 In her catalogue entry for XXV C 26, she identifies three hands responsible for the illumination, briefly describes the style of each artist and indicates two or three folios as examples of their work.6 She states that the borders executed by Hand A are reminiscent of those of the Master of the Feathery Clouds. She also identifies four additional manuscripts where Hand B of the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch was active.7 While I was beginning work on my thesis, James H. Marrow was (unbeknownst to me) working on an essay that has profound implications for the identification of the hands in XXV C 26.8 He attributes five additional works to Hand B of the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (and thus also to Hand C of XXV C 26), and proposes re-naming this artist the Master of Gerard Brilis after the scribe who collaborated with this Master in two Carthusian Bibles now in Malmesbury and Brussels.9 Marrow agrees with Wolf that Hand A of XXV C 26 is the Master of the Feathery Clouds.10 He calls Hand B the Master of Willem van Bossuyt after a Missal illuminated for an altar endowed by Van Bossuyt in Ghent.11 Unlike Wolf, Marrow “does not see the hand of the Master of Gerard Brilis in the Vienna Hours of Mary of Burgundy” (ÖNB, Cod. 1857).12 He also finds that the borders accompanying the full-page miniatures in XXV C 26 are “by another painter working in a style related to that of Lieven van Lathem.”13 Marrow‟s work now forms the basis for further discussion of the illumination in XXV C 26. On a more general level, there have been major developments in research on Flemish illuminated manuscripts, for example, the catalogue of the groundbreaking exhibition, Illuminating the Renaissance held in Los Angeles and London, 2003, the lectures presented at the accompanying symposium and Thomas Kren‟s lecture, The Trivulzio Hours and the inter-urban network of luxury book production in the Burgundian Netherlands, given in March 2007 at the symposium in honour of Anne Korteweg at the Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague.14 Also of importance is Antoine de Schryver‟s monograph on the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold, published posthumously in 2007, which is a culmination of more than 50 years of research.15 While these sources do not specifically mention XXV C 26, they do provide detailed information about the context in which the manuscript was produced. 5 Idem. In this thesis I will use the same designations as Wolf. Unfortunately, the list of the illumination (p. 238-239) contains a number of errors and omissions. 7 Wolf 1996, p. 316: Roman de Girart de Roussillon, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod.2549 (Wolf, cat.18); Breviary of Grammont, Maredsous, Bibl. de l‟Abbaye, Ms. Fº 3/1-4 (Hand D) (Wolf cat.7); so-called Missal of Pope Pius V, Mondovi, Curia Vescovile (no signature) (Hand B) (Wolf cat.8) and Hours of Mary of Burgundy, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod.1857 (Maître Y) (Wolf cat.16). 8 Marrow 2007. He discusses XXV C 26 on p. 175-176, 187-188 (notes 19-25). I cannot thank Dr. Rudy enough for bringing this essay to my attention before I began writing my thesis. 9 Carthusian Bible of Herne, Malmesbury, Parish church (no signature); Carthusian Bible from Scheut, Brussels, KBR, Ms. 201-203, 167; Book of Hours, St. Petersburg, Hermitage, Graphic Arts Department, Ms. 6; Four leaves in a Book of Hours, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. S.n. 12908, ff. 31v/32r, 44v/45r and Book of Hours, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland. See Marrow 2007, p. 176-177, 188-189 (notes 26-33). 10 See also Marrow 1987, p. 308 (note 27). 11 London, British Library, Ms. Add. 17440. See Marrow 2007, 175, 187 (note 21). 12 Marrow 2007, p. 185 (note 2). For Maître Y, see Unterkircher and De Schryver 1969, v. 2, p. 54-60. 13 Marrow 2007, p. 175. 14 Flemish manuscript painting in context : recent research, Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2006. Kren‟s lecture will be published in a collection of essays edited by K.M. Rudy. 15 De Schryver 2007, p. 10. 6 3 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 The current study My primary goal in this thesis is to understand the manuscript as a whole. I therefore began my research by making a codicological description (Appendix 1) and an overview of the manuscript (Appendix 2).16 As James Marrow has rightly noted, XXV C 26 is a “fascinating and complex book.”17 It is indeed so fascinating and complex that it took me a long time to find a focus for my thesis among the many intriguing possibilities. One of the aspects that interested me was the participation of the Master of the Feathery Clouds, a painter who worked both in Utrecht and in Ghent.18 It occurred to me that the two other artists active in XXV C 26 also had a connection to Utrecht. The style of the Master of Willem van Bossuyt is related to that of Willem Vrelant, an illuminator who worked in Utrecht before moving to Bruges between 1452 and 1454.19 The Master of Gerard Brilis collaborated on two occasions with a documented Utrechter, Antonis uten Broec.20 Although Lieven van Lathem himself did not contribute to XXV C 26, his influence on the illumination, especially the borders accompanying the full-page miniatures, is evident. Van Lathem also has connections to Utrecht. He was apparently active in Utrecht, providing border decoration in last part of a Book of Hours whose lead artist was the Master of Catherine of Cleves (The Hague, Museum Meermanno-Westreenianum, Ms. 10 F 50). This was during the period after he left Ghent in the beginning of 1459 because of a dispute with the Painter‟s Guild in that city and 1462 when he was admitted to the Guild of St. Luke in Antwerp.21 It was just about this time that the Master of the Feathery Clouds was working in Utrecht on the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours (Brussels, Royal Library, Ms. II 7619). It is certainly possible that Van Lathem and the Master of the Feathery Clouds could have encountered each other during that period. Furthermore, there is at least one direct iconographic connection in XXV C 26 with Utrecht: the depictions of the Virtues in the historiated initials accompanying the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit by the Master of the Feathery Clouds are closely related to a series by the same Master in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours. I finally decided to address the following question: What do the careers of the Master of the Feathery Clouds, the Master of Willem van Bossuyt and the Master of Gerard Brilis, and the relationship of their work in XXV C 26 to other manuscripts, tell us about manuscript production in the Low Countries in the second half of the 15th century? The first section of the thesis is a global description of the manuscript. I date the manuscript to c. 1475 on the basis of a comparison of the full-page miniatures with other work by the Master of Gerard Brilis and the relationship of the Coronation of the Virgin (f. 54v) to the miniature of the same subject (f. 61r) by Simon Marmion in the Berlaymont Hours (San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 1173) which are generally dated to the first half of the 1470s. I concur with Marrow that the inclusion in the calendar of many saints whose relics were venerated at Sint-Pieters Abbey in Ghent indicates a connection to that location. The penwork in the calendar is related to a number of manuscripts where Nicolas Spierinc of Ghent was the scribe. I demonstrate that the decorated initials were probably executed by two different hands. The texts included, and their order, are noteworthy. The Weekday Hours, 16 In the description I follow the model suggested by Prof. Biemans in the Toegepaste handschriftenkunde seminar. I have relied heavily on the descriptions of XXV C 26 prepared by Prof. Biemans and my fellow student, Mark Aussems, for the seminar, Het middeleeuwse boek. I readily acknowledge my indebtedness to them. My thanks to Dr. Broekhuijsen for comparing my description with the manuscript itself. 17 James Marrow, e-mail 17 October 2008. 18 Marrow 2007, p. 175. 19 Marrow 2007, p. 187, note 21. Defoer et al. 1990, p. 116. 20 On the Carthusian Bible of Herne (now in Malmesbury) and on the Missal in Mondovi mentioned in note 9. See Marrow 2007, p. 176. For Antonis uten Broec, see K. van der Hoek 2004. 21 De Schryver 2008, p. 46-47. Defoer et al. 1990, p. 163-164 (cat. No. 50). 4 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 which begin immediately following the calendar, are a typical feature of Books of Hours produced in the Southern Netherlands in the 15th century.22 One unusual aspect of the content is the section devoted to the female saints (f. 41v-53v) preceding the Hours of the Virgin (f. 54v-96r). The codicological evidence suggests that these texts are in their original order. An analysis of the content of the book reinforces the impression that it was made to order, and not purchased ready-made. Finally, there is a description of the stylistic characteristics of the artists who illuminated the manuscript. As will be demonstrated, each of the artists has a distinctive style which made the attribution of the painted decoration relatively straightforward. The second section focuses on the iconography of the Virtues by the Master of the Feathery Clouds in the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit, which serves as a specific example of an artist who worked in both the Northern and the Southern Netherlands returning to a theme he used earlier in his career. I demonstrate that the Virtues in XXV C 26 are closely related to a depiction of the Virtues by the same artist which accompanies the Short Hours of the Holy Spirit in the Amerongen/Vronenstyen Hours in the Royal Library, Brussels (Ms. II 7619), which is considered to be one of the finest Books of Hours produced in the Northern Netherlands in the second half of the 15th century. William Voelkle has shown that the manner of depicting the Virtues in the Amerongen/Vronenstyen Hours relates to a new iconography of the Virtues that originated in France earlier in the 15th century.23 Using XXV C 26 as a starting point, I show how artists worked on commissions in different configurations, and in roles of varying importance, how compositions were re-used and adapted and the degree of mobility of artists working the Northern and Southern Netherlands. The Master of the Feathery Clouds is a striking example of the later phenomenon: the depictions of the Virtues by this artist in XXV C 26, made in Ghent c. 1475, are directly related to the Virtues in the the Amerongen/Vronenstyen Hours, made in Utrecht c.1460 with an entirely different set of collaborators. 22 23 Wieck 2001, p. 105-106. Voelkle 1989. 5 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Part 1 – Description of UBA, Ms. XXV C 26 Date and localization The manuscript was produced in one campaign. Thus the discussion of dating and localization applies to the entire manuscript. There is no internal evidence such as an inscription or a computistic table which can used to date the manuscript. This must be done on the basis of stylistic analysis and comparison with other works. The calendar, however, provides a number of clear indications for locating the manuscript. Wolf dates the manuscript to c. 1465.24 Marrow finds that XXV C 26 is a late work by the Master of Gerard Brilis, most likely produced after 1465 and possibly as late as c. 1470. 25 The style of the full-page miniatures is, as far as I can determine from a comparison of highquality reproductions, more refined than that of other works by the Master of Gerard Brilis.26 This could be a reflection of the influence of Simon Marmion. Marrow rightly notes the relationship between the Coronation of the Virgin on f. 54v (fig. 1) and a similar composition in the Berlaymont Hours (San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 1173, f. 61r) (fig. 2).27 The latter is generally dated to the first half of the 1470s.28 The series of miniatures accompanying the Hours of the Virgin in the Berlaymont Hours (ff. 28r, 35r, 44r, 47r, 50r, 53r, 56r, 61r)29 is in turn closely related to the miniatures by Simon Marmion accompanying the Hours of the Virgin in the Trivulzio Hours (The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Ms. SMC 1, ff. 166v, 186v, 199v, 205v, 211v, 217v, 223v, 232v) dating from c. 1470-1475.30 Wolf, citing remarks made by Antoine De Schryver at a congress on medieval manuscript illumination in the Northern Netherlands (Utrecht, 10-13 December 1989), notes similarities between the borders executed by Maître Y in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857) and those accompanying the full-pages miniatures in XXV C 26.31 The former, like the Trivulzio Hours, is dated c. 1470-1475.32 If the Coronation of the Virgin in the Amsterdam Hours derives from Simon Marmion‟s composition in the the Berlaymont Hours, the former cannot pre-date the latter. Given the relationship of the Berlaymont Hours to the Trivulzio Hours and the similarities between the borders accompanying the full-pages miniatures in XXV C 26 and those by Maître Y in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy, I think it is possible to date the Amsterdam Hours nearer to 1475. Marrow states that XXV C 26 “has a graded liturgical calendar containing many rare entries of saints whose relics were venerated in Sint-Pieters Abbey in Ghent.”33 He does not, however, specify which saints these are. In order to ascertain the identity of at least some of them, I compared the entries in the calendar of XXV C 26 to Clark‟s useful Table of strictly regional feasts in calendars printed or written for Southern Netherlandish and contiguous dioceses, abbeys and colleges before 1559.34 As Clark notes, although most of the saints 24 Wolf 1996, p. 316. Marrow 2007, p. 176. 26 This will be discussed in greater detail below, p. 20. 27 Marrow 2007, p. 175, 188 (note 24). Reproduced Thorpe 1976, plate 14. Marrow 2007, p. 176, also relates the landscape setting of the Visitation (f. 72v) in the Amsterdam Hours to landscape in a Crucifixion by Marmion in the Ponitifical of the Church Sens (Brussels, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Ms. 9215, f. 129r). 28 Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 108 (under cat. no. 12) 29 Reproduced in Thorpe 1976, plates 7-14. Also via http://dpg.lib.berkeley.edu/webdb/dsheh/heh_brf?Description=&CallNumber=HM+1173 (consulted April 2011). 30 Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 132 (under cat. no. 17). Reproductions of the miniatures by Marmion in the Trivulzio Hours via http://www.kb.nl/galerie/trivulzio/index.html (consulted November 2008). 31 Wolf 1996, p. 102-103, 208. The possibility that Hand D of XXV C 26 is Maître Y of ÖNB Cod. 1857 is discussed below p. 35. 32 Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 137 (under cat. no. 19). 33 Marrow 2007, p. 175. 34 Clark 2000, Appendix III, p. 289-330. 25 6 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 celebrated at the Abbey of St. Bavo in Ghent also appear in the calendar of St. Pieters (and vice versa), the gradings differ between the two rival abbeys.35 The saints venerated at St. Pieters which occur in the calendar of XXV C 26 are listed below. Entries in the calendar in red are given in bold (unless otherwise indicated, simplex). I follow the terminology used in Clark‟s table and give the information from this source in italics.36 February, f. 3v-4r 5 Depositio Bertulfi abb cf, duplex Relics of Bertulph transferred to St. Pieters in the 10th century. 9 Ansberti ep cf, duplex Relics of Ansbert translated to St. Pieters in 944. March, f.4v-5r 3 Winwaloëi abb Relics of Winwaloe probably transferred to St. Pieters in the 10th century. 20 Wulfranni ep cf Relics of Wulfram translated to St. Pieters in 944. 31 Translatio Wandregisili abb cf. Ansberti ep cf, et Wulfranni ep cf Translation of relics of Wandrille, Ansbert and Wulfram to St. Pieters in 944. April, f. 5v-6r 19 Elevatio corporis Floriberti abb Elevation of Floribert, first abbot of St. Bavo, the possession of whose relics was claimed by both that abbey and St. Pieters in the 11th century. 30 Depositio Eremberti ep (with red annotations) Deposition of Erembert whose relics were translated to St. Pieters in 944. May, f. 6v-7r 20 Translatio Gurvali ep et Bertulfi abb Relics of Gudwall and Bertulph translated to St. Pieters in the tenth century. 27 Octava translationis Gurvali ep et Bertulfi abb June, f. 7v-8r 6 Gurvali ep, duplex (?) 25 Adalberti July, f. 8v-9r 10 Amalberge v, duplex Relics of Amelberga transferred to St. Pieters in 864. 17 Octava Amalberga v 22 Depositio Wandregisili abb cf Relics of Wandrille translated to St. Pieters 944. Quite widely celebrated. 29 Octava depositionis Wandregisili abb cf August, f. 9v-10r 1 Translatio Winaloëi abb September, f. 10v-11r 3 Adventus Wandregisili abb cf, Ansberti ep cf, et Wulfranni ep cf, duplex 10 Octava Wandregisili abb cf, Ansbert ep cf, et Wulfranni ep cf 35 Clark 2000, p. 290. I do not specify the page numbers because it is a straightforward matter to find the relevant dates in Clark‟s table. 36 7 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 October, 11v-12r 1 Deposito Bavonis cf Widely celebrated. 15 Wulfranni ep cf (with elaborate penwork) 27 Adventus Amalberge v November, 12v-13r 2 Floriberti ab December, 13v-14r 3 Adventus Gurvali ep et Bertulfi abb The inclusion of so many saints related to the Abbey of St. Pieters in Ghent in the calendar of the Amsterdam Hours indicates a strong connection between XXV C 26 and that place. It is perhaps also relevant that the Master of the Feathery Clouds (Hand A) contributed the frontispiece to the Eerste privilegieboek van de Sint-Pietersabdij te Gent, 1460, Ghent, Rijksarchief, Fonds Bisdom, Ms. B 2956.37 Script and penwork The text of the manuscript was written by one hand in a littera hybrida (bastarda). The ink used throughout is dark brownish black. There are minor corrections on folios 70v, 71r, 107r, and 124r. The majority of the penwork occurs in the calendar (figs. 3a and 3b).38 Wolf relates the penwork in the calendar of XXV C 26 to that in Stuttgart, Landesbibl., Cod.brev.162 (Sachensheim-Gebetbuch).39 She in turn relates the penwork in the Stuttgart manuscript to Cambridge, Fitzwilliam Museum, Ms. James 143; Paris, BN, Ms. n.a. lat. 215; Los Angeles, Getty Museum, Ms. 37 (Prayer Book of Charles the Bold) and Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857 (Hours of Mary of Burgundy).40 In his discussion of the dating of a Book of Hours in Darmstadt (Hess.L- u HSB 1008), Brinkmann links the penwork the Hours of Mary of Burgundy to the manuscripts mentioned by Wolf (except for Cambridge, Fitzwilliam Museum, Ms. James 143, but including XXV C 26) and also to Oxford, Bodleian Library, Ms. Douce 219-220 and Madrid, BN, Ms. Vit. 24-10.41 Kren and McKendrick relate the penwork in the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold to the works mentioned by Wolf (including XXV C 26) and also mention a connection to Madrid, BN, Ms. Vit.25-5 (Voustre Demeure Hours).42 Nicolas Spierinc is the scribe in four of the manuscripts with penwork considered comparable to that in XXV C 26: the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold; the Hours of Mary of Burgundy, the Voustre Demeure Hours and Madrid, BN, Ms. Vit. 24-10.43 This could 37 See De Schryver et al. 1975, vol. II, p. 362-363 (cat. no. 594). Reproduced in colour, Smeyers 1998, p. 277, fig. 65. 38 There is also penwork on folios 15v, 31v, 33r, 62v, 63r, 66v, 67r, 69r, 78r, 101r, 102r, 116r and 140r. 39 Wolf, 1996, p. 237: Motivisch verwandt mit dem Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, aber jedoch eckiger und kantiger, weniger ausholend, nicht so lang ausgezogen. 40 Wolf, 1996, p. 250, 294. 41 Brinkman 1992, vol.1, p. 238, note 16. It is worth noting that Dogaer, 1987, p. 133, finds that the illumination in two of the manuscripts mentioned in the discussion of the penwork (Paris, BN, Ms. n.a. lat. 215 and Madrid, BN, Ms. Vit. 24-10) is stylistically similar to that in XXV C 26. 42 Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 131, note 14. 43 Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 128 (under cat. no. 16), 137 (under cat. no. 19) and p. 142 (under cat. no. 20) and De Schryver, 2008, p. 76, respectively. 8 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 possibly be relevant to the attribution of the script of the Tenschert Hours to Spierinc.44 I do not have the necessary palaeographical skills to make an informed judgement on the matter, but it would seem to merit further investigation. Decoration The beginning of a text is signalled by a historiated initial (see below under Illumination) or a decorated initial 4 to 5 lines high. The colour of the ground alternates between blue and terra cotta (in gathering 13, red). A terra cotta (or red) letter is painted on a blue ground and vice versa. The initials are decorated with filigree in white or gold paint. The line endings are executed in the same manner. The use of gold leaf is restricted to the calendar and f. 104r (beginning of the litany). The decorative motif of a blue cross on a gold ground alternating with a gold cross on a blue ground (one line high) appears only on ff. 163rv. These decorative exceptions are probably indications that the texts they accompany were considered especially important. The decoration is not of uniform quality, and is possibly executed by two different hands. Compare, for example, the initials at the beginning of the Hours of St. Catherine (f. 41v, D) (fig. 4a) and the Hours of St. Barbara (f. 46r, M) (fig. 4b), both of which are four lines high. The ends of the letter D curve gracefully into the margin, the white filigree on the blue ground is finely modelled giving the initial a three-dimensional appearance and the slightly asymmetrical gold filigree on the terra cotta ground in the eye of the initial conveys a sense of movement. By contrast the M at the beginning of the Hours of St. Barbara looks flat and lifeless; the gold filigree on the blue background between the legs of the initial hangs limply instead of enlivening the space. A similar, if not even greater, contrast is evident in the letter S at the beginning of the suffrage to St. Anthony Abbot (f. 147v) (fig. 4c) and the letter S at the beginning of the suffrage to St. Mary Magdalene (f. 50v) (fig. 4d). The white filigree of the former creates the illusion that the edge of the letter twists and turns; the filigree in the latter makes a two-dimensional and static impression. It seems improbable that these initials could have been executed by the same hand. In both of the examples given above, the illumination on the pages with high quality decorated initials (Type 1) is by Hand A; Hand B is responsible for the illumination on the pages with less accomplished decoration (Type 2). Type 1 decoration primarily occurs in connection with illumination by Hand A. Type 2 decoration always accompanies illumination by Hand B, but sometimes also occurs with illumination by Hand A, for example on ff. 23r, 25r and 26v. The decoration accompanying illumination by Hand A is not always of a superior quality. In the Horae pro fidelibus defunctis (f.18v-21v), for example, the decoration has a sketchy quality; on f. 20r it even appears to be unfinished. Content A Book of Hours contains a number of standards texts: a calendar, the Hours of the Virgin, the Seven Penitential Psalms and Litany, the Office of the Dead and suffrages to various saints.45 There is, however, a great variety possible in the choice of the remaining texts. There is no systematic survey of the occurrence and order of texts in Books of Hours, so it is not possible to determine with complete certainty the degree to which the texts 44 See below, p. 21. Wieck 2001, p. 28. The text of XXV C 26 is complete, except for the beginning of the Hours of the Dead, originally between sheets 18 and 19. See Verbeek 2008, p. 18. 45 9 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 included in XXV C 26 and their order is exceptional.46 In my opinion, there are a number of unusual aspects which merit special attention. As Korteweg notes, offices for the seven days of the week are a typical feature of Books of Hours produced in the Southern Netherlands.47 The usual order is as follows: Sunday, Holy Trinity; Monday, Hours of the Dead; Tuesday, Holy Spirit; Wednesday, All Saints; Thursday, Holy Sacrament; Friday, Holy Cross and Saturday, Virgin Mary. In XXV C 26, the Weekday Hours begin in the third gathering following the calendar with the Sunday Hours of the Holy Trinity (f. 15r-18v). The subsequent Hours conform to the order mentioned above through the Thursday Hours of the Sacrament (f. 27r-29r).48 One would expect that this would be followed the Friday Hours of the Holy Cross. In XXV C 26, however, the Hours of the Passion of the Lord and the Compassion of the Blessed Mary (f. 30r-33v) come next and are the last office in the sequence. The Weekday Hours are followed by a rather lengthy prayer (f. 33v-36v) to the venerable Bede, a saint not automatically associated with the Low Countries. Perhaps the most striking aspect of XXV C 26 is the section devoted to female saints (f. 41v-53v) preceding the Hours of the Virgin (f. 54v-96r). This begins with the Hours of Saint Catherine (f. 41r-45v), followed by the Hours of Saint Barbara (f. 46r-48v) and suffrages to nine female saints (f. 49r-53v). The suffrages to the male saints begin on f. 147r, where one would expect them to occur, after the Hours of the Virgin, the Seven Penitential Psalms and Litany and the Office of the Dead. The codicological evidence confirms that the Hours of St. Catherine are in their original place. The fifth gathering (f. 30-37) includes the last of the Weekday Hours (f.30r33v) and ends with a prayer, Oratio devota ad dominum, which begins on f. 37r and continues into the sixth gathering (f. 38-45), ending on f. 41r. The Hours of Saint Catherine begin immediately thereafter in the same gathering on f. 41v. The Hours of Saint Barbara and suffrages to the female saints are all contained in the seventh gathering (f. 46-53). Although this gathering could have originally had another location in the manuscript, it seems likely, and logical, that the Hours of Saint Catherine would be followed by the Hours of Saint Barbara. The remnant of a catchword is visible on f. 54r, just before the beginning of the Hours of the Virgin, which would indicate that, unless this was ignored at the time the codex was rebound, the beginning of the Hours of the Virgin followed the Hours of Saint Barbara and the suffrages to the female saints. The Hours of the Virgin are contained in gatherings eight to twelve (f. 54-96), and are followed by the Seven Penitential Psalms and Litany (f. 97v-109r) which begin in gathering thirteen (f. 97-105) and continue into gathering fourteen (f. 106-113). There is also the remnant of a catchword preceding the Seven Penitential Psalms and Litany (f. 97r), which would indicate that these are also most probably in their original location. The Office of the Dead (f. 110v-135r) begins in gathering fourteen and ends in the middle of gathering seventeen (f.130-137).49 The codiocological evidence strongly indicates that gatherings three to seventeen containing these key texts, the Weekday Hours, the Hours of Saints Catherine, the Hours of Saint Barbara, the suffrages to the female saints, the Hours of the Virgin, Seven Penitential Psalms and Litany and the Office of the Dead, are in their original sequence. It could be 46 Neither Kate Rudy nor Klara Broekhuijsen knew of such survey. See Appendix I for a list of the texts in XXV C 26. According to Korteweg 2005, p. 147, note 1, Leroquis 1927-1943, remains the best source for the texts in Books of Hours. 47 Korteweg 2005, p. 137. See also Wieck 2001, p. 105-106. The Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162) also includes the Weekday Hours, ff.43r-93v. 48 The day of the week is only specifically mentioned in the incipit for the Hours of the Holy Trinity and the Hours of the Sacrament. 49 The remains of a third catchword can be found at the beginning of gathering fifteen (f. 114-121). 10 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 argued that these fifteen gatherings were re-positioned as a unit when the codex was rebound, but it seems more probable to conclude that the texts in XXV C 26 are in their original order. The only Dutch in the manuscript is the incipit on f. 162v: Dit is een sonderlinghe oratie. Ende die suldi smorghens lesen tijlijc. Judging from the texts included and their order, it would seem safe to conclude that the patron who ordered the Amsterdam Hours was not in the market for a prêt-à-porter Book of Hours. This conclusion is further supported when one considers the extent and quality of the illumination that accompanies the texts and its iconography. Illumination The illumination was carried out by four unidentified artists: Hand A, the Master of the Feathery Clouds/Meester van de Vederwolken (also known as the Master of the London Passional); Hand B, the Master of Willem van Bossuyt; Hand C, the Master of Gerard Brilis and Hand D, an artist executing borders in the style of Lieven van Lathem. There is a clear division of labour among the artists. There are only two instances where Hands A and B are active in the same gathering. In the third and eighteenth gatherings, only the column miniatures on f. 15r and f. 145r, respectively, are by Hand B; the rest of the illumination in these gatherings was carried out by Hand A. The roles of Hands C and D are also clearly delineated: Hand C is responsible for the full-page miniatures; Hand D provided the accompanying borders. Hand A - Master of the Feathery Clouds This anonymous artist was dubbed the Meester van de Vedervolken by Hoogewerff in 1936.50 A year later, he was given another name by Byvanck, the Master of the London Passional.51 Of the hands active in XXV C 26, the Master of the Feathery Clouds (MFC) is the best-defined. Some scholars maintain that he was active in the Southern Netherlands c. 1450-1460 before coming to Utrecht to participate in a number of important commissions.52 Others see him as a Northern artist who was also active in the Southern Netherlands.53 Much of the literature deals with his borrowing compositions and motifs from woodcuts, for example from the Biblia Pauperum.54 The historiated initials by the MFC in XXV C 26 which accompany the Monday Hours of the Dead are based on woodcuts illustrating the Ars moriendi. 55 Scillia has argued that the MFC did not only borrow from woodcuts for his illumination, but that he also designed them.56 Style As Delaissé noted, the style of the MFC is easily recognizable.57 His figures have large, angular hands and round heads that are frequently disproportionately large in respect to their stocky bodies. A striking characteristic of facial types is the heavy, puffy eyelids and eyes with prominent pupils which are mostly not in the centre of the eye. His skies are an intense blue with small parallel cirrus clouds, the feathery clouds which feature in one of his 50 Hoogewerff 1936, part 1, p. 537-544. Byvanck 1937, p. 89-91. The manuscript from which the name derives is London, British Library, Add. 18162. 52 See, for example, Cardon 1996, p. 412. 53 Marrow 1987, p. 307-308. Van der Bergen 2009, p. 86, refers to him as the “Utrechtse Meester van de Vederwolken.” Scillia 1982, p. 25, states that he began his career as a peripheral member in the circle of the Master of Evert Zoudenbalch. 54 See Smeyers 1975, Koch 1977, Scillia 1982, Henry 1983, Cardon and Smeyers 1989 and Cardon 1996. 55 See Verbeek 2008. 56 Scillia 1982. 57 Delaissé 1949, p.240. 51 11 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 names of convenience. His landscapes are fairly simple. The figures are primarily confined to the foreground, and the impression of space is created by overlapping hills, a river or a winding road. There are often stylized trees on either side of the scene whose leaves are depicted as a green ground with parallel brownish stripes and dark stipples along the top and edges. His mastery of perspective is not perfect. In scenes which take place indoors, he tries to create a sense of receding space with a tiled floor, but this does not always relate logically to the rest of the interior. His border decoration is, in my opinion, fairly accomplished. He includes birds (especially owls and peacocks), butterflies, bears and assorted drôleries among the acanthus and stylized flowers. His work is generally characterized as mediocre and rather crude. Delaissé says that his technique is vulgar and heavy; Scillia calls his style homely and inelegant.58 Both have to admit, however, that his work has a certain liveliness and directness. Works/collaboration In spite of the shortcomings perceived by 20th century art historians, the MFC participated in a number of important commissions and was also the main artist two large scale manuscripts. Delaissé notes that the MFC was “perhaps the most prolific illuminator in Utrecht around 1460.”59 In addition to XXV C 26, Marrow identifies five manuscripts from the Southern Netherlands with illumination by the MFC:60 Book of Hours, c. 1450, Brussels, KBA, Ms. IV 194 Book of Hours, c. 1450, Madrid, BN, Ms. Vitr. 24-10 Platearius, Le livre des simples medicines, second half 15th century, Paris, BN, fr. 623 Pierre de Vaux, Vie de soeur Colette, c. 1460, Brussels, KBA, Ms. 10980 Eerste privilegieboek van de Sint-Pietersabdij te Gent, 1460, Ghent, Rijksarchief, Fonds Bisdom, Ms. B 2956 Cardon has indicated that the 69 pen drawings illustrating the Speculum Humanae Salvationis (Oxford, Bodeleian Library, Ms. Douce f4) “can be situated in the surroundings of the Master of the Feathery Clouds at the time he was still working in the Southern Netherlands, in between 1450-1460.”61 Beginning c. 1460, the MFC was active in the circle of the Utrecht Master of Evert Zoudenbalch where he contributed to two major manuscripts: the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, c. 1460, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619 and the Bible of Evert Zoudenbalch, c. 1465, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 2771-2772. The Master of Gijsbrecht van Brederode also worked on the second manuscript. He and the MFC collaborated on a Book of Hours, c. 1465, Liège, University Library, Ms. Wittert 34; the Master of Gijsbrecht van Brederode was responsible for the 12 historiated initials and the MFC painted the borders on the pages marking the major textual divisions.62 The fluidity of artistic connections within this context can be illustrated by the following example. The Master of Gijsbrecht van Brederode possibly collaborated with the 58 Ibid., p.240 and Scillia 1982, p. 25. Delaissé 1968, p. 72. 60 Marrow 1987, p. 308, note 27. 61 Cardon 1996, p.412. According Cardon the drawings are connected to graphics: engravings by the Master with the Banderoles, Master E.S. and illustrations in the North Netherlandish xylographic edition of the Biblia Pauperum. Images via http://bodley30.bodley.ox.ac.uk:8180/luna/servlet/view/search/what/MS.+Douce+f.+4/?sort=Shelfmark%2CFoli o_Page%2CRoll_&q=Title%3DSpeculum+humanae+LIMIT%3AODLodl%7E1%7E1&pgs=50&res=1&cic=O DLodl%7E1%7E1 (accessed October 2011) 62 Defour et al. 1990, p. 214 (cat. no. 68). 59 12 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Master of the Boston City of God/ Antonis Rogiersz. uten Broec on a Book of Hours, c. 14601465, Cleveland, Otto F. Ege.63 Antonis Rogiersz. uten Broec in turn, worked with the Master of Gerard Brilis on the Missal in Mondovi and the Carthusian Bible from Herne (Malmesbury). And, of course, the Master of Gerard Brilis and the MFC worked together on XXV C 26. The MFC did not always merely play a secondary role in the production of manuscripts. There are two large scale works for which he provided the illumination, the first part of a History Bible, c. 1467, The Hague, Koninklijke Biblotheek, 78 D 39 and a Passyonael van den Heyligen, van den helen jaer (London Passional), c. 1465-1470, British Library, Add. 18162.64 There are also a number of Books of Hours in which he was the principle artist, The Hague, Rijksmuseum Meermanno-Westreenianum (RMW), Ms. 10 F 3, c. 1465-1470 and Utrecht, Rijksmuseum Het Catharijneconvent. (RMCC), ABM 21 and ABM 22, both c. 1460-1475 and a Life of St. Francis, third quarter of the 15th century, Rotterdam, Gemeentebibliotheek, Ms. 96 B 4. All of these manuscripts were produced in the Northern Netherlands and are in Dutch. The MFC in XXV C 26 The MFC is responsible for the illumination (11 column miniatures and 54 historiated initials) including the borders in gatherings 3 (except for the column miniature of the Mercy Seat on f. 15r), 4-6, 13, 14, 18 (except for the column miniature of the Presentation of the Temple on f. 145v) and 19.65 The subjects depicted are narrative (column miniature of Pentecost, f. 22r, historiated initials of the story of Joachim and Anna and the early life of the Virgin accompanying the Wednesday Hours of All Saints in gathering 4), allegorical (historiated initials with allegories of the Virtues accompanying the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit in gathering 4)66 or devotional (column miniature of the Madonna on the crescent moon, f. 142r, historiated initial of a soul being taken up into heaven, f. 111r). As Vermeeren notes, this type of subject matter is typical of the MFC.67 Less common are representations of saints accompanying suffrages. One would certainly expect these in the London Passional, a Flemish translation of Jacobus de Voragine‟s Legenda aurea (with 35 additional saints‟ lives), but, as Vermeeren remarks with some astonishment, not a single saint‟s legend is illustrated.68 There is a depiction of the beheading of St. Barbara by the MFC in the border of Oxford, Bodleian Library, Ms. Douce 381, f. 85r; the miniature is attributed to Master B of the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours.69 Judging from the reproductions available, I think it is possible that at least three other folios in Ms. Douce 381 have borders with illumination by the MFC: f. 80r* [sic] (Angels in upper border, peacock at right; compare with angels in upper border of British Library, Add. 18162, f. 19r); f. 81r (Judge upper right corner, martyrdom St. Christopher at right) and f. 87r (right 63 Ibid., p. 212-213 (cat. no. 66) The second part of the History Bible is in Ghent, University Library, Ms. 632. Judging from the reproductions in Henry 1983, the illumination is not by the MFC. The compositions for the illumination in both parts are related to the Biblia Pauperum. 65 My fellow students in the “handengroep” thought that the column miniature on f. 15r was the only contribution to the manuscript by a fourth artist, but I agree with Marrow 2007, page 188, note 21, that this is by Hand B. The column miniature on f. 145v is also by Hand B. See Appendix 2 for an overview of the subjects of the illumination and the hands responsible. 66 These are based on the depictions of the Virtues by the MFC accompanying the Short Hours of the Holy Spirit in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours (Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, c.1460), ff. 74r, 78r, 83v, 86r, 88r, 90v and 93v. 67 Vermeeren, 1959, p. 202-203. 68 Vermeeren, 1959, p. 201. On p. 203 he states “dat in het gehele tot nu toe bekende oeuvre van deze meester [i.e. the MFC] géén op het feesteigen der heiligen betrokken verluchting aanwijsbaar is.” 69 See Scillia 1982, p. 34 and Delaisse 1968, p. 49, fig.109. 64 13 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 border, St. Veronica holding out a cloth to Christ carrying the cross; man with three nails/spikes).70 In XXV C 26, there are fifteen representations of saints by the MFC, a column miniature of St. Catherine on f. f. 41v and 6 column miniatures and 8 historiated initials accompanying the suffrages to the male saints in gathering 19. These column miniatures of saints show, in my opinion, some of the best work in the MFC‟s oeuvre. He takes pains to place the figures in relatively detailed setting (he is of course constrained by the space available, 60x35 mm), and the saints are carefully modelled. In two cases, the border decoration specifically relates to the saint depicted: the suffrage to St. Anthony Abbot on f. 147v includes a temptress riding a swine at lower left and the suffrage to St. Adrian on f. 150r (fig. 5) contains a scene of his martyrdom at lower left. In other instances, there are vignettes in the border with depictions of the world upside down (mundus inversus): f. 147r (suffrage to St. James) (fig. 6), frog in a robber‟s cape cutting the throat of a stork; f. 149r (suffrage to St. Sebastian), hare/rabbit pushing a man in a wheelbarrow and f. 153v (suffrage to St. Daniel, historiated initial) hare/rabbit pushing a dog in a wheelbarrow. A fox pulling a bird cage on a sledge accompanies the suffrage to St. George, f. 149v. The high quality of the depictions of the saints and the elaborate border decoration might be attributable to the importance of the commission.71 The most attractive openings in the manuscript are those where the full page miniatures of the Master of Gerard Brilis are faced by a page with illumination by the MFC. The folio opposite the miniature of David in Prayer (f. 98r) (fig. 7) depicts David looking out from his palace in an historiated initial. In the roundel at the bottom of the page, we see the bathing Bathsheba who bears a striking resemblance to the temptress on f. 147v. This provides a fitting illustration to accompany the Seven Penitential Psalms for it is the beginning of the chain of events which leads David to commit adultery with Bathsheba and for him to arrange for the death of her husband, Uriah the Hittite, in battle. 72 It is noteworthy that David sees Bathsheba from a separate area of the page; he looks, as it were, across the text and to see her in the border. A figure at lower right appears to look at Bathsheba over his shoulder.73 This sort of interaction across different fields of the page can also be seen on f. 57v of the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162). Here God the Father in the border at upper left has sent out the dove of the Holy Spirit into the miniature of Pentecost by the Master of Gerard Brilis to the right. This in turn is reminiscent of the depiction of God the Father in an historiated initial sending out the dove of the Holy Spirit to the scene of the Baptism of Christ at the bottom of f. 93v of the Turin Milan Hours.74 The miniature of the Raising of Lazarus is faced by another page richly decorated by the MFC (ff. 110v and 111r) marking the beginning of the Office of the Dead. The historiated initial contains a depiction of a soul being taken up into heaven against a blue background with gold stars. In the border, a dog confronts a unicorn at the bottom and a man is harvesting meticulously rendered grapes at right, perhaps a Eucharistic allusion. If one‟s knowledge of the style of the MFC and the Master of Gerard Brilis was based only on their work in XXV C 26, it would seem unlikely that their hands could be confused. However, in three instances where Marrow believes the Master of Gerard Brilis is active, Cardon and Smeyers attribute the illumination to the MFC: the Breviary of Grammont, 144970 Reproductions of Ms. Douce 381 via http://bodley30.bodley.ox.ac.uk:8180/luna/servlet/s/0vs62u (consulted 30 December 2010). I am grateful to Kate Rudy for sharing her images of British Library, Add. 18162 with me. 71 Rudy 2009, p. 202, suggests that XXV C 26 was commissioned “by a high functionary of the Sint-Peterskerk in Ghent.” 72 The story takes place in 2 Samuel, chapter 11. 73 A similar figure appears in the right border of Madrid, BN, Ms. Vitr. 24-10, f. 84r, but he is looking at the miniature of the Annunciation to the Shepherds to the left (reproduced De Schryver 2008, p. 163, fig. 50). 74 Turin, Museo Civico d‟Arte Antica, Ms. 97. Reproduced Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 82, fig. 39. 14 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 1450, Maredsous, Bibl. de l‟Abbaye, Ms. Fº/3/1-4; the Carthusian Bible from Scheut, 1460, Brussels, KB, Ms. 201-203, 167 and the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, c. 1455-1460.75 They are not the only ones who mention the MFC in connection with the Breviary of Grammont and the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch. In his discussion of the relationship of the Stuttgart manuscript to the work of Lieven van Lathem, De Schyrver states that the style of “Master B of the Sachsenheim Hours is close to that of the Master of the Feathery Clouds,” and also says that Master B had previously worked on the Breviary of Grammont.76 The Dutch character of the Stuttgart manuscript was first noted by Delaissé, who found that the originality of the iconography was reminiscent of contemporary Dutch Books of Hours, and also indicated that it possibly provided evidence for the presence of artists from the Northern Netherlands in Flanders who had not yet adapted their style to their new surroundings.77 One specific connection is the motif of a couple being married in a historiated initial attributed to the Master of Gijsbrecht van Brederode in the Bible of Evert Zoudenbalch which also appears in an elongated medallion in the border by the MGB in Cod.brev 162, f. 127r.78 A comparison of the miniature of the Madonna and Child with two female saints by the Master of Gerard Brilis in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (f. 95r) (fig. 8) with the miniatures of the Madonna of Humility and the Madonna on the Crescent Moon by the MFC in XXX C 26 (ff. 25r and 142r, respectively) (figs. 9a and 9b) does indeed show a number of similarities: the boxy shape of the body of the Christ Child, the large hands of the Virgin, the facial types of the female figures and their long, reddish brown hair. Although these similarities may not be close enough to warrant an attribution of the work of Hand B in the Stuttgart manuscript to the MFC, I think it is possible to conclude that, at least during a certain period in their careers, the styles of these two masters had something in common. Hand B – Master of Willem van Bossuyt The Master of Willem van Bossuyt (MWvB) was identified by Marrow in 2007. He attributed illumination in eight manuscripts to this Master, including XXV C 26. Willem van Bossuyt was abbot of St. Bavon, Ghent, between 1418 and 1457. The name work is a Missal (London, British Library, Add. 17440) which the MWvB illuminated for use on an altar commissioned and endowed by Van Bossuyt. Although there is limited documentation for some of the works attributed to the MWvB, there is nothing specifically written about him except for Marrow‟s brief discussion.79 Style The MWvB was obviously influenced by the prolific Willem Vrelant, an illuminator known to have worked in Utrecht before moving to Bruges between 1452 and 1454.80 Compare, for example, the Mercy Seat/Trinity on f. 15r of XXV C 26 with the depiction of the same subject in a Books of Hours illuminated by Vrelant c. 1460 (The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Ms. 76 F 7, f. 15v) (figs. 10 and 11). The compositions are almost identical and the depiction of the figures shares a two-dimensional quality. A comparison of two female saints from these manuscripts shows that, although the MWvB works in the style of Willem Vrelant, his work is more simplistic and less refined (St. Christina, XXV C 26, f. 52va and St.Catherine, 76 F 7, f. 27v) (figs. 12 and 13). 75 See Cardon and Smeyers 1989, p. 85-86. De Schryver 2008, p. 177. On page 176 De Schryver states that he is now convinced that Lieven van Lathem did not contribute to the Stuttgart manuscript. 77 Delaissé 1959, p. 168-169 (cat. no. 206). 78 ÖNB, Cod. 2772, f. 10r. Reproduced Defoer, H.L.M. et al., 1990, p. 203, fig. 107 (under cat. no. 61). See De Schryver 2008, p. 177. 79 Marrow 2007, p. 175 and 187-188 (note 21). 80 Defoer et al. 1990, p. 116, 161-162 and Marrow 2007, p. 187 (note 21). 76 15 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 His elongated figures have oval faces on thin necks. The facial expressions are consistently doll-like, frequently bordering on the vacuous. He employs bright colours which have an almost opaque quality, and defines his figures with a dark outline. His use of tiled floors to create a feeling of depth sometimes results in a clash of patterns and colours (XXV C26, f. 49r, for example), but the interiors remain flat and airless. Like the Master of the Feathery Clouds, he includes fruit, flowers, birds, animals and drolleries in his borders. These share the linear, naïve quality of his column miniatures and historiated initials. Works/collaboration Of the eight manuscripts which Marrow attributes to the MWvB, two were made for known patrons: the name manuscript in the British Library dated 1483 and a Book of Hours made in Ghent for Jacob Donche, counsellor to Philip the Good, and his second wife, Philippa Utenhove, possibly on the occasion of their marriage in 1473 (Claremont, CA, Scripps College, Denison Library, Kirby Ms. 1).81 A Book of Hours in Latin and Dutch which was auctioned at Christie‟s, London, in 2001, was presumably made for the couple shown praying in historiated initials on ff. 21r and 82r.82 The five remaining manuscripts are all works for personal devotion: Prayer Book, c. 1475, private collection, Pennsylvania; Book of Hours, c. 1470, Sale, Christie‟s London, 17 November 2004 (lot 19); Book of Hours, c. 1450-1460, Turin, Museo Civico d‟arte Antica, inv. no. 449/M; Book of Hours, second half of the 15th century, New York Public Library, MA 39; Book of Hours, c. 1450, Rostock, Universitätsbibliothek, Ms. theol. 25 and XXV C 26.83 The Christie‟s sale catalogues are virtually the only sources that attempt to relate works attributed to the MWvB to other manuscripts.84 In the catalogue of the 2001 sale, the illumination is attributed to the Master of the Vraie cronicque descoce (also know as the St. Hadrian Master), an artist whose style derives from Willem Vrelant. Bernard Bousmanne attributed 27 works to this artist, including a Book of Hours in the Walters Art Museum, Baltimore (W. 195) and Book of Hours in the Huntington Museum, San Marino (HM 1136).85 The catalogue of the 2004 sale notes that the simplified figures with features drawn in brown in the manuscript in that sale are close to a Book of Hours, Walters Art Museum (W. 229). Randall notes that the pictorial programme in W. 229 relies on the same designs that were used in W. 195.86 The Book of Hours in Turin contains a full-page miniature of the Last Judgment (f. 121v) where only the heads of the figures emerging from the ground are depicted.87 This detail also occurs in KB 76 F 7, f. 112v. The Last Judgement in the Book of Hours in 81 Ibid. and Dutschke and Rouse 1986, p. 85-89, figs. 26-28. Colour reproductions of some of the illumination via http://www.uncius.be/genea/kirby/index.html and http://www.uncius.be/genea/kirby/global2.html (consulted January 2011). 82 Christie‟s [auction cat.] London, 9 July 2001. (lot 23). 83 For additional information, see Marrow 2007, p. 187-188 (note 21). 84 Christie‟s [auction cat.] London, 9 July 2001 (lot 23) via http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?intObjectID=2092990&CID=5447010005801a (consulted January 2011) and Christie‟s [auction cat.] London, 17 November 2004. (lot 19) via http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?intObjectID=4393918&CID=5447010005801a (consulted January 2011). Of course, he is not called the Master of Willem van Bossuyt in these sources since Marrow identified the artist several years later. 85 Bousmanne 1997, p. 58. Alain Arnould, in a review of Bousmanne (Burlington Magazine, 140 (1998)1146, p. 625-626), attributes several additional works to the Master of the Vraie cronicque descoce. For W. 195, see Randall 1997, part I, p. 326-331 (cat. 265); part II, figs. 501, 502 and 585. Reproductions of HM 1136 are available via the Digital Scriptorium http://scriptorium.columbia.edu/ (consulted January 2011). 86 Randall 1997, part I, p. 331-334 (cat. 266); part II, figs. 503, 586. 87 Reproduced in Bernard and Pagella, p. 44 (cat. 10). 16 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Rostock (f. 142r) includes the Gate of Paradise and the Mouth of Hell that are in the Turin depiction, but the figures coming out of their graves are shown from the waist up.88 Of the works attributed to the MWvB by Marrow, only XXV C 26 and the Book of Hours in New York have illumination by other artists. There are eleven full-page miniatures in the latter. Five of these, which introduce all the major texts, are attributed to the MWvB. Marrow attributes the remaining six to one of the Masters of the Beady (or Narrow) Eyes (Maîtres aux Yeux Bridés), who were primarily active in Ghent.89 Apart from Marrow, the only information I could find on the New York Book of Hours is the record in the Digital Scriptorium.90 There are images available of two full-page miniatures, Crucifixion on f. 7v and Pentecost on f. 14v (subject incorrectly given as the Death of the Virgin) both of which appear to be by the same artist. The text on f. 8r is identified as the opening of a main text (The Hours of the Holy Cross). If Marrow also considered this an opening of a main text, then according to him, the miniature on f. 7v should be by the MWvB.91 After comparing the image of the Crucifixion in the Digital Scriptorium with the work of the MWvB in XXV C26, I am not entirely convinced that this is the same hand. The palette in the New York manuscript is less bright (almost chalky) and the facial types lack the doll-like expression that occurs so frequently in XXV C26. The modelling of the face and throat of St. John is also different from the faces in XXV C26, for example, the face of Christ in the historiated initial on f. 162r. All of the work attributed to the MWvB by Marrow is in the style of Willem Vrelant. Because of the sparse documentation available for these manuscripts, it has been impossible for me to get a really clear picture of oeuvre of the MWvB as a whole. In the reproductions I have been able to find, I see a number of variations in style which make me wonder whether all this work is by the same hand. It is, however, far beyond the scope of this thesis to attempt to resolve this in any satisfactory manner; the idea of entering the Willem Vrelant quagmire is really too daunting for a mere Masters student. The MWvB in XXV C 26 The MWvB is responsible for the illumination (11 column miniatures, one 2 column miniature and 35 historiated initials), including the borders, in gatherings 3 (only the column miniature of the Mercy Seat on f. 15r; border by the Master of the Feathery Clouds), 5, 7-12, 17, 18 (only the column miniature of the Presentation in the Temple on f. 145v), and 20-22, including the two column miniature on f. 175r. All of the illumination for the suffrages to the female saints, except for Saint Catherine, is by the MWvB. He also is responsible for the historiated initials depicting the standard infancy cycle which accompany the Hours of the Virgin, the most important text in the manuscript. These have an engaging directness which is quite charming. In a restricted space, the MWvB, presents a fairly detailed representation and there is emotional interaction between the figures. In the Visitation (f. 66r) (fig. 14a), for example, Mary and Elizabeth seem genuinely glad to see one another. There is, however, a certain dissonance in this section which is partly due to the fact that the subjects of the full-page miniatures by the Master of Gerard Brilis and the historiated initials on the opposite page do not match until the 88 Reproduced in Rothe 1968, pl. 84. Marrow 2007, p. 188 (note 21). 90 http://scriptorium.columbia.edu/ (consulted January 2011), search under NYPL MA 039. 91 The text on f. 15r could be the beginning of the Hours of the Holy Spirit, but there is no description of the contents of the ms as a whole. 89 17 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 end of the cycle (Vespers and Compline), and partly because of the contrast in style on either side of the opening.92 The latter probably wouldn‟t have bothered the original owner. The MWvB seems to be at his best when he depicts a narrative scene. His column miniatures and historiated intials with the female saints in gathering 7 are rather mundane. The depiction of Angels carrying souls to heaven on f. 136r (fig. 14b), however, shows that he is capable of setting multiple figures in a credible landscape. In this case, the sweetness of the expression on the face of the angel on the left is appropriate; it is as if he is trying to reassure the souls who are being transported. The column miniature of the 10,000 martyrs (f. 165r) is even more ambitious. He makes an effort to vary the poses of the martyrs who are impaled on the branches of the tree and imbues the figures on the right with calmness as they await their fate. The real tour de force of the MWvB in XXV C 26 is the two column miniature of two angels with the Arma Christi on f. 175r (fig. 15) which introduces the Passion narrative of St. John. This is not so much for the execution, but the unusual manner in which the subject is presented. Here the instruments of the passion are depicted as a coat of arms. Perhaps this is a visual pun; in Dutch the Arma Christi are called wapenen van Christus and a coat of arms is a wapen. 93 The Arma Christi are more commonly included as part of another scene, for example, the Mass of St. Gregory, Christ as the Man of Sorrows, the Last Judgement or the Crucifixion, or arranged on their own against a neutral background. The Crucifixion is the subject of the full-page miniature on f. 174v, so the Arma Christi are nonetheless presented within the context of a scene depicting the suffering of Christ. The border on all four sides is also exceptional in the work of the MWvB in XXV C 26. He takes advantage of the opportunity to include a man on horseback chasing a larger man at the bottom of the page and a half-naked man astride a griffon in the upper right corner who is taking aim with a long spear at a bird beneath him. There is an earlier example from the Low Countries of a representation of the Arma Chrisi as a coat of arms by the Master of the Morgan Infancy Cycle in the Book of Hours, c. 1415, New York, Pierpont Morgan Library, M. 866, f.101v, which accompanies prayer to Christ Crucified, a text that frequently occurs in manuscripts from Delft.94 This is a much more dynamic depiction by a master of great artistic ability. Although there are similar elements in XXV C 26, such as the helmet above a shield with angels on either side, the composition does not seem to derive directly from this source. M. 866 has an added section (f. 194-214), without illumination, that was composed in Flanders, c. 1450.95 Even if the MWvB had no knowledge of the depiction by the Master of the Morgan Infancy Cycle, it would seem possible to say that this usual iconography had made its way from the Northern Netherlands to the South by the middle of the 15th century. In XXV C 26, the MWvB shows himself to be a competent collaborator who was entrusted with important illumination: the column miniature of the Mercy Seat on f. 15r opens the manuscript; the historiated initials depicting the infancy cycle are an integral part of the Hours of the Virgin and the two column miniature on f. 175r, with its unusual depiction of the Arma Chrisi, is the last illumination in the book. 92 Of course, since the miniatures have been inserted on single leaves, they could have been re-arranged at some point. The order of the full-page miniatures accompanying the Hours of the Virgin will be discussed in more detail below. 93 Also Passiewerktuigen or lijdenswerktuigen. 94 Defoer et al. 1990, p. 59-60 (cat. no. 120, fig. 15) 95 Morgan Library, Corsair, http://corsair.morganlibrary.org/msdescr/BBM0866.htm (consulted February 2011). 18 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Hand C – Master of Gerard Brilis The hand of this artist was first recognized by Pächt, Jenni and Thoss in border miniatures on ff. 39r and 72r in the Roman de Girart de Roussillon, Vienna ÖNB Cod. 2549.96 They also identified illumination by the same painter in Breviary of Grammont, Maredsous. Thoss saw additional work by this artist in the border decoration of ÖNB Cod. 2549.97 Marie and Heinz Roosen-Rünge noticed a relationship between these two manuscripts and the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch.98 It was Wolf, however, who established the connection with the illumination by Hand B in the Stuttgart manuscript, and who attributed work in three additional manuscripts to this master.99 For her study of the SachsenheimGebetbuch, Hand B was important because his work in the Roman de Girart de Roussillon provided an indication of Lieven van Latham‟s relationship to the Roussillon workshop.100 Most recently, Marrow summarized all previous scholarship and added five additional works to the oeuvre of this master. He named the artist after the scribe Gerard Brilis, with whom this Master collaborated in two Carthusian Bibles now in Malmesbury and Brussels.101 Style The Master of Gerard Brilis (MGB) takes great care in creating a well-defined space for the figures in a scene. His mastery of perspective, his ability to depict various materials and his eye for detail can be seen in the miniature of the Presentation in the Temple (f. 83v) (fig. 30). The landscapes in scenes that take place outdoors, for example the Visitation (f. 72v) (fig. 25), create a convincing illusion of depth. This is achieved by placing the main figures in the foreground with a road winding back into the middle distance where there is a sometimes a bridge or small group of buildings. In the far distance there is often a town on a hill painted in hazy, blue tones. His figures are slender, almost weightless, and are relatively small in comparison with the setting. The heads are small in relationship to the bodies, and the hands have long, thin fingers. The faces of the all women, except for Elizabeth in f. 72v, have more or less the same oval form. The cheeks sometimes are touched with pink, but there are no cheekbones. The men‟s faces have stronger contours and, as in the case with the women, there is a different facial type for young and old. Compare, for example the face of the young disciple with those of the older men, including St. Peter, in f. 110v (fig. 42). There is limited interaction between the figures; they occasionally glance one another, but there is no sense of an emotional exchange. The women witnessing the Massacre of the Innocents (f. 87v) (fig. 33) react to the slaughter of their (or their neighbour‟s) children by clasping their hands and slightly inclining their heads. The MGB is not always successful in his depiction of the human form in different poses: King David is clearly kneeling on the ground (f. 97v) (fig. 38), but the position of his knees is slightly ambiguous; in the Coronation of the Virgin (f. 54v) (fig.1), Mary seems to be hovering instead of kneeling and the pose of the woman (Mary Magdalene?) (f. 110v) is purely decorative and has no relationship with human anatomy. His colours are clear and deep, but not harsh or bright. A distinctive light pink occurs in a number of miniatures, most frequently used for the exterior of buildings, but also for other details, such as the donkey‟s trough (f. 76v) (fig. 28), an interior wall (f. 87v) or the cloth on the bench behind Mary and Jesus (f. 167v) (fig. 44). 96 Pächt, Jenni, Thoss 1983-1990, vol. 1, p. 53, 58 and fig. 56 Thoss 1989, p. 28-29, figs. 34-39 and plates 10, 19. 98 M. and H. Roosen-Rünge, 1981, vol. 2, p. 301. 99 Wolf 1996, p. 63-64, 315-316. See above, p.3, for more information. 100 Wolf 1996, p. 208. 101 Marrow 2007, p. 169-170. 97 19 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 A small detail, which appears consistently in the miniatures with a landscape as a setting, is a tree whose trunk is twisted in an unusual manner: f. 72v, on the left, next to the margin, and on the rocky hillock at right; f. 92v (fig. 36), to the right, just above the head of the donkey (Joseph‟s staff also has a twist in it); f. 97v, in the middle distance, next to the road; f. 110v, at the left above the shoulder of the young man in the second row and on the right above the figure in red and f. 174v (fig. 46), to the left of Mary‟s head. During the seminar in 2006, I half-jokingly suggested that Hand C should be called the Master of the Twisted Tree-trunk (Meester van de Geknikte Boomstam). Marrow‟s name of convenience is obviously preferable because it links the Master to a known person. Perhaps it is fanciful, but it has occurred to me that it might be possible that “boom” or “stam” could have been part of the artist‟s name, or the name of his birthplace. It is evident that the style of the MGB evolves during the course of his career, and that the illumination in the earlier works is not as refined as it is in XXV C 26. It has already been noted, for example, that in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (c. 1455-1460) there are certain similarities with the style of the Master of the Feathery Clouds. The variation in style is also apparent in a comparison of the Visitation (f. 65v) (fig. 16) in the Book of Hours in the Hermitage (c. 1460-1465) and the depiction of the same subject in XXV C 26 (f. 72v) (fig.25). Although the basic composition is the same, the figures in the latter are more elongated and slender. In the former, St. Elizabeth almost looks like a buxom farmer‟s wife and the difference in age between the two women is not as pronounced. The palette in XXV C 26 is more subdued and the prominent, rather old-fashioned halos have disappeared. Similar differences can be seen in the Flight into Egypt (Hermitage, f. 104v and XXV C 26. f. 92v), especially in the depiction of the donkey. The long, graceful ears and shaggy coat of the animal in the latter (also to been seen in the Nativity, f. 76v) (fig. 28) make the creature in the Hermitage Hours look like a horse pretending to be a donkey. The style in the Tenschert Hours (c. 1465-1475) comes closest to that in XXV C 26. Works/collaboration The MGB makes a modest debut in a manuscript for an important patron, the Roman de Girart de Roussillon, commissioned by Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 2549) and illuminated in Brussels after1448.102 Although the MGB only contributed miniatures in the borders of two pages (ff. 39r and 72r) and some additional border decoration, it must have been a considerable honour to collaborate on this project with the Girart Master, who has been identified with Dreux Jehan, a Parisian artist who entered the service of Philip the Good in 1448.103 This is the only secular work with illumination by the MGB. After this the MGB worked on a series of large-scale ecclesiastical works, beginning 1449-1450 with the Breviary of the Abbey of St. Adrian, Grammont/ Geraardsbergen (Abbaye de Maredsous, Ms. Fº 3/1-4) where he collaborated with at least five artists, including illuminators related to the Masters of Guillebert de Mets and the Privileges of Ghent and Flanders.104 The MGB made a significant contribution, both in amount of illumination and the importance of the subjects depicted, for example, the page devoted to the miracle of the shrine of St. Adrian (Fº 3/4, f. 1r) (fig. 17) and the miniature depicting the abbot of the monastery praying before St. Adrian (Fº 3/4, f. 95v). There are numerous roundels in the margins which depict either scenes relating to the subject of the historiated initial or Old Testament scenes which were seen as prefigurations of New Testament subjects. Similar 102 Marrow 2007, p. 170. Wolf 1996, p. 316. Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 212. Smeyers 1998, p. 414, maintains that the illumination in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch which has been connected to Lieven van Lathem is closer to the work of Dreux Jehan. 104 Marrow 2007, p. 171. 103 20 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 roundels are used extensively in the Missal in Mondavi and the Book of Hours in St. Petersburg. The two roundels by the MGB in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch are on ff. 81r and 104r.105 The roundel on f. 81r (opposite a full-page miniature of the Crucifixion) depicts Eleazer killing an elephant in battle in an attempt to save his people (I Maccabees 6:43-47), a scene which prefigures the sacrifice of Christ. The same scene occurs in the roundel on f. 19r in the Book of Hours in the Hermitage, again opposite a full-page miniature of the Crucifixion, but here the elephant is brown instead of grey. It is obvious that the MGB never saw an elephant (or an accurate depiction of one). In the so-called Missal of Pius V, c. 1450 (Mondovi, Curia Vescovile, no signature) the MGB worked with two other artists. The artist who contributed, among other things, the impressive full-page miniature of the Crucifixion (f. 151v) accompanying the Canon of the Mass is thought to be Jean Tavenier.106 The other is Antonis uten Broec, an Utrecht artist who worked in both the Northern and Southern Netherlands.107 The MGB collaborated with Antonis uten Broec again in the Carthusian Bible of Herne, 1457 (Malmesbury Abbey Church, no signature). The script of this Bible was written by Gerard Brilis who was also the scribe of the Carthusian Bible from Scheut, 1460 (Brussels, KBR, Ms. 201-203, 167) where the MGB also was active.108 The MGB thus works twice with both Antonis uten Broec and Gerard Brilis: in the Carthusian Bible of Herne where all three participated, with Antonis uten Broec in the Missal in Mondovi and with Gerard Brilis in the Carthusian Bible from Scheut. The remainder of the MGB‟s oeuvre is found in five works intended for private devotion: Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162), c. 1455-1460. The main artist is Lievan van Latham/Sachsenheim Master (Wolf‟s Hand A). The MGB (Wolf‟s Hand B) is the second most important artist. The composition of the full-page miniatures of the Crucifixion on f. 80r (fig. 47) and the Annunciation on f. 87v (fig. 23) by Hand C are related to the miniatures of the same subjects in XXV C 26 (ff. 174v and 65v, respectively) (figs. 46 and 22). No other work from his hand has been identified.109 Book of Hours (St. Petersburg, Hermitage, Graphic Arts Department, Ms. 6), c.14601465. This is one of the few manuscripts where the MGB supplies all the illumination.110 Book of Hours (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. S.n. 12908), 1466. This contains two full-page miniatures and two historiated initials by the MGB (ff. 31v/32r and 44v/45r).111 Marrow originally thought that these came from a dismembered Book of Hours and were inserted into another Book of Hours, possibly produced in the Northern Netherlands.112 However, after examining the manuscript, he realized that they were integral to the part of the manuscript in which they appear.113 In addition to the standard texts, the last part of the manuscript (from f. 239r) contains a series of Hours 105 There are eight roundels depicting scenes of the Passion of Christ in the border of the miniature of Christ being nailed to the Cross (f. 26r), but these are not by the MGB. 106 Marrow 2007, p. 172 107 For Antonis uten Broec, see Van der Hoek 2004 108 Marrow 2007, p. 176-177. 109 Wolf 1996, p. 293-298 (cat. no. 15), Marrow 2007, p. 173-175. 110 Marrow 2007, p. 177-179, Zimina and Anisimova 2005, p. 194-198 (cat. no. 42) and Dolgodrova 1983. I am very indebted and extremely grateful to James Marrow for sharing his translations of the Russian texts and for the high quality images of the illumination in the Hermitage Book of Hours. 111 Pächt, Jenni, Thoss 1983, vol. 1, p. 81-82, vol. 2, figs. 132, 133, as Flemish, after 1466. 112 Marrow 2007, p. 179. 113 James Marrow, e-mail 17 October 2008. Mr. Marrow was very generous to share his new information with me. 21 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 devoted to six saints: John the Baptist, John the Evangelist, Gertrude, Jerome, Barbara and Catherine. As far as I could judge from the reproductions in Pächt and Jenni, Hands B and D appear to be artists from the Northern Netherlands; Hand C reminds me a bit of the Master of Willem van Bossuyt.114 The latter is an intriguing possibility, but it would be unwise to make an attribution solely on the basis of a rather poor reproduction. Book of Hours (Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland), c. 1465-1475. All the illumination and border decoration is by the MGB. The script is thought to come from the hand of Nicolas Spierinc.115 The graceful, elaborate cadelles and intricately decorated initials are similar to those found in the Prayerbook of Charles the Bold (Los Angeles, Getty Museum, Ms. 37) and the Hours of Mary of Burgundy (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857).116 The composition of eight of the full-page miniatures is very closely related to miniatures depicting the same subjects in XXV C 26. The compositions are somewhat simplified, perhaps due to the smaller size of the pages (190 x 140 mm vs. 139 x 98 mm). These will be discussed in greater detail below. Book of Hours (Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26), c. 1475. There are several iconographical oddities in the work of the MGB. A number of these occur in the Hermitage Hours. Marrow mentions the Virgin and Child with Angels (f. 24v) where the infant Jesus plays a psalterium or zither held by the angel on the right and the Raising of Lazarus (f. 129v) which takes place in a walled, formal garden.117 Also unusual is the Nativity (f. 76v) which does not take place in a stable, but in the bedroom of a house where Mary is lying in a proper bed with two women attending her. This is more typical of depictions of the Birth of the Virgin or the Birth of John the Baptist. The Adoration of the Magi (f. 86v) takes place in the same setting. In the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, the historiated initial accompanying the suffrage to Saint Christopher (f. 158r) (fig. 18) is not the standard depiction of the saint carrying the Christ Child across a river, but shows Christopher praying by a wayside cross with the devil running away in fear. The miniature in the Tenschert Hours (f. 139v) (fig. 41) accompanying the Seven Penitential Psalms is also unusual. Instead of showing David in Penitence, it is a depiction of Michal helping David escape from Saul‟s servants (I Samuel 19:11-12).118 Marrow does not mention, however, that the depiction could derive from the Biblia Pauperum which shows the Flight into Egypt and its types (sig. e), with Jacob fleeing Esau on the left and David escaping from Saul on the right.119 This is one possible example of the MGB using woodcuts as a source of inspiration for his illumination. It might be worthwhile comparing the roundels with typological scenes in the Breviary from Grammont, the Missal in Mondavi and the Hermitage Hours with woodcuts from the Biblia Pauperum and the Speculum Humanae Salvationis to see if other borrowings occur. In some ways, the career of the MGB is similar to that of the Master of the Feathery Clouds. Both work with established artists on important commissions, and contribute to large scale ecclesiastical works. The MGB almost always works with other artists, the exceptions being the Carthusian Bible from Scheut which has a modest programme of illumination120 and the Hermitage and Tenschert Hours. The Master of the Feathery Clouds works on his own in 114 Pächt and Jenni 1975, vol 1, p. 87-88, vol. 2, fig. 262 (f. 71v, Hand B), fig.265 (f. 186 v, Hand D) and fig. 270 (f. 163r, Hand C). 115 Marrow 2007 p. 180-181, Christie‟s auction catalogue, 2 June 2004, p. 18-21 (lot 14). 116 Christie‟s auction catalogue, 2 June 2004, p. 20. See also the decorated initial beginning the Stabat Mater (f. 140r) in the Trivulzio Hours (The Hague, KB, Ms. SMC 1). 117 Marrow 2007, p. 178. 118 Marrow 2007, p. 180. The Biblical source is given in Marrow as I Kings 19:11-12. 119 Reproduced in Henry 1983, plate XVIIIc. 120 Four historiated intials in vols. 1 (Ms. 201, ff. 1r and 1v) and 2 (Ms. 201, both on f. 1r). See Marrow 2007, p. 189, note 33. 22 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 two extensively illuminated large scale works, a History Bible, c. 1467, The Hague, Koninklijke Biblotheek, 78 D 39 and the Passyonael van den Heyligen, van den helen jaer (London Passional), c. 1465-1470, British Library, Add. 18162, and also a number of Books of Hours. Although XXV C 26 is the only work where these two artists collaborate, each of them worked on a Book of Hours where Nicolas Spierinc was the scribe, the Tenschert Hours (MGB) and Madrid, Madrid, BN, Ms. Vitr. 24-10 (Master of the Feathery Clouds).121 The MGB in XXV C 26 The MGB is responsible for the 11 full-page miniatures on ff. 54v, 65v, 72v, 76v, 83v, 87v, 92v, 97v, 110v, 167v and 174v. The borders accompanying the miniatures are by Hand D. One of the unusual aspects of XXV C 26 is order of the subjects of the miniatures that accompany the Hours of the Virgin. The following table compares the standard cycle and the cycle of the full-page miniatures and historiatied initials in XXV C 26.122 I will describe each of the miniatures in XXV C 26 briefly and relate them to other depictions of the subjects by the MGB (especially those in the Tenschert Hours), noting where relevant the variation from the standard cycle, and, where appropriate, to similar works by other artists Hour Matins Lauds Prime Terce Sext None Vespers Standard subject Annunciation Visitation Nativity Annunciation to the Shepherds Adoration of the Magi Presentation in the Temple Flight into Egypt (or Subject XXV C 26 (fpm) Coronation of the Virgin Annunciation Visitation Nativity/Annunciation to the Shepherds No full-page miniature Presentation in the Temple Massacre of the Innocents Subject XXV C 26 (hi) Annunciation Visitation Nativity Annunciation to the Shepherds Flight into Egypt Flight into Egypt Circumcision Adoration of the Magi Massacre of the Innocents Massacre of the Innocents) Compline Coronation of the Virgin (or Flight into Egypt, Massacre of the Innocents, Assumption of the Virgin, Death of the Virgin) Coronation of the Virgin / Christ blessing the Virgin, f. 54v (Hours of the Virgin, Matins) (fig. 1). Christ seated on the right side of an elaborate Gothic throne holds an orb on his lap with his left hand and raises his right hand in blessing. He wears a crown and is dressed in a white robe and red mantle. The crowned Virgin at left wears a blue mantle highlighted with gold along the edge123 and kneels to accept the blessing with crossed hands. The scene is surrounded by an aureole filled with angels painted in blue monochrome (camaïeu bleu), highlighted with white and gold. The outer edge of the aureole is orange/pink with rays emanating from it. Marrow has noted the possible influence of a miniature of the same subject by Simon Marmion in the Berlaymont Hours, c.1470-1475 (San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 1173, f. 61r) (fig.2), especially the throne with its elaborate openwork tracery.124 The composition of the miniature in the Tenschert Hours (f. 43v) (fig. 19) is almost identical to that in XXV C 26, although the tracery in the throne is not as fine or intricate. An earlier example (1466 or 121 For the manuscript in Madrid and Spierinc, see De Schryver 2008, p. 76-77. Standard cycle of subjects from Wieck 2001, p. 60. 123 Mary is consistently depicted in the same garment, so I will not specify this in every description. 124 Marrow 2007, p. 175. See Kren and McKendrick 2003, p. 108-110 (cat. no. 12) for more information about the Berlaymont Hours. 122 23 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 before)125 from the hand of the MGB is found in a large historiated initial in the Book of Hours in Vienna (ÖNB, Cod. S.n. 12908), f. 45r (fig. 20). In this depiction, a blue sky with clouds is visible through the tracery of the throne, which is not the case in XXV C 26 or the Tenschert Hours. There is also no aureole, but two angels in white standing on either side of the throne; angels painted in blue tones are found in three of the spandrels of the field reserved for the initial. The subject of the illumination that usually accompanies Matins in the Hours of the Virgin is the Annunciation. This is the case with the historiated initial in XXV C 26, but the full-page miniature depicts the Coronation of the Virgin. At the time of the Christie‟s auction in 2004, the miniature depicting this subject in the Tenschert Hours was placed before the Hours of the Holy Spirit (beginning f. 36r), but has since been inserted before the Mass of the Virgin (f. 43v).126 The Coronation of the Virgin in the Berlaymont Hours comes before Compline in the Hours of the Virgin. Since the full-page miniatures in XXV C 26 are on single leaves, it is certainly possible that they are not in their original order. There is no Mass of the Virgin in XXV C 26, so the miniature could not have been placed before this text. If the miniature of the Coronation of the Virgin was once placed before Compline, this would mean that the miniatures depicting the Massacre of the Innocents and the Flight into Egypt, now in the usual place before Vespers and Compline, respectively, would have been inserted elsewhere, which would have resulted in a very strange sequence indeed. It is perhaps significant that the depiction of the Coronation of the Virgin in the Vienna Hours, which is in an historiated intial and thus an integral part of the text, appears at the opening of the Hours of the Virgin (f. 45r) (fig. 20). The full-page miniature opposite (f. 44v) (fig. 21) depicts the Virgin and Child with Saints Catherine (left) and Barbara (right). As Marrow notes, this subject does not normally introduce the Hours of the Virgin.127 As mentioned above, the Hours of the Virgin in XXV C 26 are preceded by a lengthy section devoted to the female saints (ff. 41v-53v), and that the codicological evidence suggests that this is probably the original sequence. Within this section, there is an apparent hierarchy. Saint Catherine is the most important, she has her own Hours and these are illuminated with a column miniature and six historiated initials.128 Barbara also has her own Hours, but the illumination is limited to a column miniature and one historiated initial. The suffrages to the following six saints begin with a column miniature. The remaining three suffrages have only an historiated initial. This section devoted to female piety could be regarded as an overture to what follows immediately, the high point of the manuscript with its seven full-page miniatures and eight historiated initials, the Hours of the Virgin. In this case, full-page miniature depicting Mary as the Queen of Heaven (Regina Coeli) makes plain her paramount status. The preceding section devoted to the female saints could be seen as an expansion of the Virgo inter Virgines theme129 encountered in the Vienna Hours. On the basis of the precedent in the Vienna Hours, it might be possible to conclude that the Coronation of the Virgin is in its original place in XXV C 26. 125 Marrow 2007, p. 179-180. Christie‟s auction catalogue, 2 June 2004, p. 18 (under lot 14); Leuchtendes Mittelalter 2008, p. 62. There are a number of discrepancies in the description of the manuscript in these sources. For simplicity‟s sake, I will use the folio numbers given in the second source when discussing the miniatures in the Tenschert Hours. In November 2008, a CD with reproductions of the miniatures in the Tenschert Hours was kindly sent to me by Dr. Ina Nettekoven of the Antiquariat Bibermühle, Ramsen. In the reproduction of the miniature of the Coronation of the Virgin, the modern pencil foliation (not visible in the illustrations in the auction catalogue) would indicate that the Mass of the Virgin begins on f. 43r. 127 Marrow 2007, p. 179. 128 Her special importance is also apparent in the calendar where her feast-day (25 November) is noted in red and duplex. 129 For the development of the Virgo inter Virgines theme see Pumplin 2010. p. 316-321. 126 24 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Annunciation, f. 65v (Hours of the Virgin, Lauds) (fig. 22). The scene is framed by a grey stone archway. Mary is reading at the right, sitting/kneeling in what could be a chapel before a prie-dieu covered by a green cloth. She looks over her shoulder towards the left at Gabriel who wears a white undergarment with a red robe, which is richly decorated along the front opening. His wings are green on the outside, and yellow (top) and blue (bottom) on the inside. He carries a slender sceptre/staff. The grey stone of the setting evokes the interior of a church. Just behind the figures is a central column supporting the springing of a ribbed vault. There is a brocade cloth of honour on a broad pier behind Mary and what appears to be a lamp hangs under a small blue baldaquin above her head. An arcade, suggesting a cloister, can be seen through an arch behind Gabriel. The yellowish tiled floor has a very subtle pattern. The composition is closely related to the Annunciation by Hand C in the SachsenheimGebetbuch, f. 87v (fig. 23). There are a number of variations, especially in the colours, but the setting is basically the same.130 A significant difference is that in the Stuttgart ms. includes banderol with Gabriel‟s Ave Maria greeting and a small dove of the Holy Ghost which has golden rays behind it emanating from the cloister in the background at the left. A notable absence in both XXV C 26 and Cod. brev. 162 is the traditional vase with lilies. As Wolf notes, the depiction in the Stuttgart ms. has a stronger narrative character.131 The miniature is opposite the Saturday Hours of the Virgin (f. 88r-93v).132 The historiated initial on f. 88r depicting Rebecca and Eliezer at the Well and the border decoration are by the MGB. Although f. 87r is blank, which could indicate that the miniature is on a single leaf which had been inserted separately, it is possible that the MGB saw his collaborator‟s depiction. Another possibility is that Hand C and the MGB used a common prototype. The miniature of the Annunciation in the Hermitage Hours (f. 47v) also emphasizes the narrative aspect and has two roundels with typological scenes in the border, one at left depicting God appearing to Moses in the Burning Bush and the other at the bottom with Rebecca and Eliezer at the Well. There is a slight resemblance of the figures of Gabriel and Mary to those in XXV C26, but apart from that, the depiction of the scene, which takes place in a domestic interior, is totally different. The Annunciation in the Tenschert Hours (Matins), f. 53v (fig. 24), is directly related to the depiction in XXV C 26. The perspective of the interior in the former, however, is more convincing, and the pronounced green and yellow pattern of the tile floor is closer to the depiction in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch. A Book of Hours, Use of Rome, Ghent, c. 1470-1480, in the Bodleian Library, Oxford (Ms. Gough Liturg. 15)133 contains a miniature of the Annunciation (f. 23r) that is in some respects reminiscent of the depiction in XXV C 26. The scene takes place in a church, the angel Gabriel wears a white undergarment and red robe and there is a brocade cloth of honour behind Mary. There are also elements in the border that seem to be connected to the MGB, the figures in the Visitation embrace each other in a manner similar to the depiction of the subject in the Hermitage Hours (f. 65v) (fig. 16), the two women are similar in age to one another and the clothing of Elizabeth is also green and reddish orange. Another point of reference in the border is the strawberry motif where the fruit is uplit like the strawberries in the work of the MGB; these also appear in the borders on other pages (ff. 43v, 53r and 66v). The fact that the composition of a second miniature in this manuscript (Nativity, f. 39v, see 130 See Wolf 1996, p. 76-79, for a detailed description of f. 87v in Cod. brev. 162. Wolf 1997, p. 79. 132 Irtenkauf and Fiala 1962, p. 196. 133 Pächt and Alexander 1966, p. 26, pl. XXVII. De Schryver et al. 1975, vol. II, p.368 (cat. no. 601). Colour reproductions are available via http://bodley30.bodley.ox.ac.uk:8180/luna/servlet/s/3abfc8 (accessed May 2011). 131 25 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 below) is related to XXV C 26, could reinforce the indication that there is some sort of a relationship between these Hours.134 Visitation, f. 72v (Hours of the Virgin, Prime) (fig. 25). Mary and Elizabeth greet one another in the foreground of a deep landscape. Elizabeth is distinctly older than Mary and wears a red robe and white wimple. The road winds back to a bridge with a gate house in the middle ground which leads back to fortified castle or town. In the far background are some hazy mountains. There are outcroppings of rock or hillocks on the right behind Elizabeth. The miniature of the Visitation in the Tenschert Hours (f. 70v) (fig. 26) appears before the beginning of Lauds. The composition is again virtually identical with the miniature in XXV C 26. The only historiated initial in the manuscript is on the opposite page. It depicts two women meeting in a landscape, with the older woman on the left, almost certainly a typological scene.135 The miniature of the subject in the Hermitage Hours (f. 65v) (fig. 16) has been discussed above in the context of the evolution of the style of the MGB. There is a roundel in the border of f. 65v with a typological scene which has been identified as Ruth and Naomi.136 The inspiration for change in the depiction of Elizabeth as a woman relatively close in age to Mary to one notably older might be the miniature of the subject in the Prayer Book of Philip the Good, c. 1460-1467 (Paris, BNF, Ms. n.a. fr.16428) f. 46r (fig. 27).137 The Girart Master (Dreux Jehan?) and Lieven van Lathem are among the illuminators who worked on this important devotional book.138 Even from a small black and white reproduction, it is possible to see the close similarity of the posture, apparent age and costume of the figure in the Prayer Book in Paris to the figure of Elizabeth in XXV C 26. As noted above, the MGB collaborated with the Girart Master early in his career and with Lieven van Lathem in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch. Nativity/Annunciation to the Shepherds, f. 76v (Hours of the Virgin, Terce) (fig. 28). In the main scene, Mary kneels in adoration before the tiny Christ Child who lies naked on the stone pavement with rays of light emanating from his body. The ox and ass look out from a dilapidated stall made of grey stone, which has a wooden veranda with a thatched roof propped up by a tree branch. There are three steps leading downward in the lower right corner.139 Joseph walks towards Mary and Jesus from the left wearing a blue cloak and red turban highlighted with gold to show his special status. In the middle ground is a group of buildings with a man standing in front of them. The road winds off to the left background where the second scene, the Annunciation to the Shepherds, takes place. In the far distance is a town. The miniature of the Nativity/Annunciation to the Shepherds in the Tenschert Hours (f. 88v) (fig. 29) appears before the beginning of Prime. Again, it contains all of the elements which appear in XXV C 26, but the composition is more compressed. One small difference is the position of the Christ Child. He does not lie flat on his back as he does in XXV C 26, but is propped up against a wooden beam running along the front of the stable. The mantle of the Virgin is also arranged in a slightly different manner, and she has a subtle halo. As noted above, the Nativity in the Hermitage Hours (f. 76v) is a total departure some the standard 134 The resemblance to XXV C 26 has also been noted by Dogaer 1987, p. 133. Marrow 2007, p. 180. 136 Dolgodrova 1983 (I am uncertain exactly which page because this is not indicated in the translation). 137 Reproduced De Schryver 2008, p. 173, fig. 66. 138 De Schryver 1975, vol. II, p. 365-366 (cat. no. 597), Wolf 1996, p. 275-279 (cat. no. 11). According to Wolf the Girart Master is responsible for the illumination in gathering 8 (ff. 42-50). 139 Randall 1997, III, pt. 1, p. 351(under entry for W. 208), finds that this is a reference to the “cave of the Nativity.” 135 26 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 depiction. Marrow finds that alignment of the figures of Joseph, Mary and Jesus in XXV C 26 may be analogous to the arrangement of these figures in two of Simon Marmion‟s depictions of the Nativity.140 The miniature of the Nativity in Gough Liturg. Ms. 15 (f. 39v) has a number of elements in common with the depiction in XXV C 26: Mary kneels in adoration before the naked Christ Child who lies on a stone floor, there is an open space at lower right where the steps are in XXV C 26, the ox and ass with a column between their heads look out from the stable, a thatched veranda is held up by a tree branch and there is a group of buildings in the middle distance with tiny figures in front of them. There are also significant differences: Joseph is not present, unless his is the man with the woman at left who seem to be on ice skates (!) and the Annunciation to the Shepherds takes place in the margin instead of in the background of the miniature. De Schryver has noted the similarity of the composition of the Crucifixion (f. 14r) in Gough Liturg. Ms. 15 to the miniature by Simon Marmion in the Pontifical of the Church of Sens (Brussels, KBA, Ms. 9215, f. 129r). 141 A miniature of the Crucifixion in the Prayer Book of Philip the Good (f. 84r) is also related to the miniature by Simon Marmion in Brussels.142 It seems that the MGB also knew this source; the three figures on the right in the Crucifixion in the Tenschert Hours (f. 21v) are almost a literal quotation of the same group in the Sens Pontifical.143 There is no full-page miniature before Sext. The Adoration of the Magi is the usual subject that accompanies this Hour. It is not possible to know whether the miniature in XXV C 26 has been removed, or simply always was absent. If it ever existed, it probably would have looked much like the depiction of the subject in the Tenschert Hours (Sext, f. 103v) which takes place in the same setting as the Nativity and depicts Mary sitting in front of a red cloth with Joseph standing next to her as the Magi arrive from the left. The subject of the historiated initial at the beginning of Sext in XXV C 26 (f. 80r) is the Circumcision. A fullpage miniature of this subject occurs before None in the Tenschert Hours (f. 111v). This has several elements in common with the depiction of the scene in the Hermitage Hours (f. 91v), but is not directly related. Presentation in the Temple, f. 83v (Hours of the Virgin, None) (fig. 30). The miniature is framed by a bluish grey stone arch which opens into a chapel with a ribbed vault. On the left wall are three windows, two circular above and an elongated oval window below. On the back wall is a round window with tri-partite tracery and a brocade cloth of honour. A carved arch on the right opens onto a cloister. The tiles on the floor are very much like those in the Annunciation. The scene is oriented around a carved wooden polygonal table/altar covered with a white cloth on which the naked Christ Child sits. His mother Mary, her head covered by a simple white headdress, stands next to him at left. She is accompanied by two women, the younger of whom, dressed in a pink gown and a patterned blue turban, holds a basket with the pair of sacrificial doves. The older woman could possibly represent the prophetess Anna. A bearded man in a blue turban and mantle whose features resemble those of Joseph in the Nativity stands behind the altar. Since Joseph is recorded as being present to hear Simeon‟s prophecy, this could be Jesus‟ father. Next to him is an old man with a mitre, almost certainly Simeon. A young, beardless man in red stands behind the priestly figure and a fourth man with a red undergarment, green cloak and blue shoulder covering stands at the right. 140 Marrow 2007, p. 188, note 24. De Schryver 1975, vol. II, p.368 (cat. no. 601). 142 De Schryver 1975, vol. II, p.366 (cat. no. 597); Wolf 1996, p. 279, reproduced fig. 17. 143 Leuchtendes Mittelalter 2008, p. 60. 141 27 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 The miniature of the subject in the Tenschert Hours (f. 95v) (fig. 31) is found before Terce.144 There are a number of subtle differences: the archway framing the scene is the distinctive pink the MGB is fond of; the altar seems to be shifted somewhat to the right; the oblong window on the side wall is missing; the tiles have a more pronounced pattern; the older woman is dressed in red instead of blue; Mary has a definite halo and the man in red behind Simeon has a beard. Again, the depiction in the Hermitage Hours (f. 91v) is not at all similar. The setting is in some ways similar to that in the historiated initial depicting the Circumcision by Lieven van Lathem in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857), f. 90r (fig. 32), with the two round windows in the wall at left, a round window with tri-partite tracery and a ribbed vault.145 A full-page miniature of the Presentation, (Southern Netherlands, c. 1460-1470) on a single leaf, once owned by Sir Alec Martin, London, is also similar to the depiction in XXV C 26; the connection is reinforced by the border elements which are related to those in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy and those in XXV C 26.146 Massacre of the Innocents, f. 87v (Hours of the Virgin, Vespers) (fig. 33). The scene takes place in a ground floor room in Herod‟s palace. Herod sits at left on a carved Gothic throne partially covered with an orange/pink cloth. He wears a full-length regal blue garment trimmed with ermine and an extraordinary green hat, which turns up sharply on the side, revealing a white lining (also ermine?). The hat has an extremely long, pointed brim, and appears to incorporate a crown. He holds a sceptre in his right hand and gestures with his left hand towards a group of three women at left who stand outside looking in through a window at the back of the room, but he does not make eye contact with them. His attention is directed at a soldier in the centre who kneels at his feet, holding up a tiny, naked baby who is still alive. The soldier standing behind the kneeling figure runs a baby through with his sword, next to him a third soldier looks on. Two of the women look towards Pilate, the third woman, closest to the column in the centre, looks at the baby being killed. On the right is an opening to the outside where more soldiers are gathered, their pikes and axes silhouetted against the sky. A third tiny baby is impaled on one of these. The left wall is a slightly deeper colour orange than the cloth on Pilate‟s throne and has two mullioned windows. The wooden ceiling is supported by stone brackets/corbels.147 The tiled floor is lighter in the foreground than it is in the background. The setting brings to mind depictions of Christ before Pilate, where Jesus is brought in to the Roman official who sits on a throne, for example the miniature by Lieven van Lathem in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy, f. 74v (fig. 34). Here one of Pilate‟s attendants wears a hat something like Herod‟s in XXV C 26, but the brim is not as long. Pilate himself wears a similar hat with a very long pointed brim in an historiated initial in the Oraisons de Saint Augustin (Roubaix, Médiathèque de Roubaix, ms. 7, f. 13v), Flemish, c. 1460. There are a number of major and minor differences in the depiction of the subject in the Tenschert Hours (Vespers), f. 118v (fig. 35). Herod wears a crown instead of an extravagant hat and he looks directly at the three women, appearing to shake his sceptre at them. Only one of them looks at him, perhaps the mother of the baby being held up in front of him. The two other women look towards the soldiers on the left, whose number is not as large as it is in XXV C 26. The minor differences include the absence of a cloth on the throne 144 Marrow 2007, p. 180, notes that the Annunciation to the Shepherds is the usual subject here and that at None, where the Presentation usually occurs, there is a depiction of the Circumcision in the Tenschert Hours. He suggests that these two miniatures may be “inserted out of sequence in interchanged positions.” 145 Reproduced Unterkricher 1993, n.p.; commentary p.46. The borders of f. 90r are by Maître Y. 146 Plotzek 1987, p. 196-197 (no. 62). Subject is incorrectly given as the Circumcision. 147 Thanks to my architect brother-in-law, Cornelis de Boer, for his help with the name of this element. 28 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 which is has an arched back and is set back further into the room, no windows in the left wall and a simpler pattern in the tiled floor. The depiction in the Hermitage Hours (f. 96v) is also set in a throne room, but is much bloodier, with one the mother fighting her child‟s life while another mourns over a little headless corpse. The setting is also quite different, with an elevated throne of the right side instead of the left. Flight into Egypt, f. 92v (Hours of the Virgin, Compline) (fig. 36). The landscape is similar to that in the depiction of the Visitation except there is a hillock is the middle distance instead of a bridge. Mary sits on the donkey which is facing right and is perhaps the same beast which was present at the Nativity. Mary‟s head is covered with her mantle, and she holds the infant Jesus in the crook of her right arm and holds on to the red reins with her left hand. Joseph, walking ahead, has turned a corner and faces the other direction. He wears the same clothing he did in the Nativity and carries a white bundle tied with a red cord to a stick over his left shoulder. The composition of the miniature in the Techschert Hours, f. 130v (Compline) (fig. 37) is virtually identical. The figures are larger, however, in relation to the landscape. The landscape in the depiction in the Hermitage Hours (f. 104v) is built up in the same way, but the arrangement of the figures is different with Mary holding the Christ Child with both arms while Joseph leads the donkey. David in penitence, f. 97v (Seven Penitential Psalms) (fig. 38). David is depicted as an old man kneeling in front of a fortified gateway with towers on either side. The masonry is light pink; the roofs are sky blue. David wears a red robe trimmed with ermine and a blue cape edged with gold; the sleeves of his blue undergarment are highlighted with gold. He raises his hands in supplication as he looks upwards toward the left where God appears in an aureole holding an orb in his left hand, blessing David with his right hand. David‟s ermine-lined hat and an open book are on the ground in front of him; his harp is propped up against a low wall. There is an enclosed garden to the left with a fountain featuring a small, urinating boy. A road on the left winds off into the countryside. It is interesting to see how use of the composition evolves. The first version by the MGB appears in an historiated initial in the Grammont Breviary, 1449-1450 (Abbaye de Maredsous, Ms. Fº 3/3, f. 25r) (fig. 39).148 The setting is slightly different, a stream runs under the entrance to the building complex and there is no garden at left, but the colour scheme is the same. David appears older and more portly in XXV C 26, his nose is also less prominent and he lacks the distinctive hairline that occurs in the earlier work of the MGB. The figure of David in the Breviary is larger in relationship to the background; there is also no hat on the ground. The initial appears at the beginning of the Beatus Vir. There are three roundels in the border showing David with the head of Goliath, David putting enemies to flight and David enthroned as King. Thus the context of the depiction is not overtly penitential, perhaps David is thanking God for his victories. The second version is the historiated initial in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, c. 14551460, which appears at the beginning of the Seven Penitential Psalms, f. 104r (fig. 40). On f. 103v is a full-page miniature of the Last Judgement by the MGB. This depiction is closer to that in XXV C 26, especially in the way David is represented, although the stream still runs under the entrance to the building and there is no garden on the left. A roundel with David with the head of Goliath is in the lower border. Even with this triumphant scene, the context is now definitely penitential. 148 Reproduction of the initial in Marrow 2007, p. 168, fig.1. 29 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Although the setting in the full-page miniature in the Tenschert Hours accompanying the Seven Penitential Psalms, f. 139v (fig. 41), is reminiscent of these other examples, it shows an entirely different scene, Michal helping David escape from Saul‟s servants. In the Vienna Hours, an historiated initial of David in Prayer appears at the beginning of the Seven Penitential Psalms, f. 32r. David is depicted kneeling before an altar at left in a chapel with three figures at the right, apparently commenting on the scene. When the composition is used for a full-page miniature in XXV C 26, the MBG uses the opportunity to add a walled garden with a prominent fountain. A Manneken-Pis fountain figure appears three times in the Hermitage Hours: in a roundel depicting Rachel and Eliezer at the well in the border of the Annunciation (f. 47v); on its own in a roundel opposite the Nativity (f. 77r) as the main subject149 and in the back of the garden in the full-page miniature of the Raising of Lazarus (f. 129v). Perhaps it is just coincidence, but a fountain with a urinating boy was installed in Geraardsbergen (Grammont) in 1459.150 It is perhaps noteworthy that the first version of David in Prayer/Penitence appears in a Breviary made for the Benedictine abbey of St. Adrian located in that place. In any event, it is at least possible that the MGB knew of this fountain. The Raising of Lazarus, f. 110v (Office of the Dead) (fig. 42). Christ and a group of seven apostles, Peter to the right of him and a young disciple (perhaps John) in the back row, stand behind a long bluish grey open sarcophagus with its lid resting on the front end. To the right of this, a young woman with long, blond hair kneels opposite them, next to the sarcophagus. She is dressed in an elegant red gown trimmed with ermine and wears a black headdress with a gold pattern and an open back, and probably represents Lazarus‟ sister, Mary, who was identified with Mary Magdalene in the Middle Ages.151 Lazarus, naked except for his shroud, kneels in the sarcophagus with his hands raised towards Jesus and his followers. At the left, a group of three men in rich clothing, probably meant to represent Jews, witness the scene. A road leads off into a deep landscape with buildings in the middle and far distance. A flock of miniscule birds fly across the sky. The scene in the Tenschert Hours (Office of the Dead), f. 165v (fig. 43) is a simplified version of the depiction in XXV C 26. There are only two disciples with Jesus and two witnesses at the far end of the sarcophagus. The landscape is not nearly as deep and the figures are once more larger in relation to the setting. The costume of the female figure is nearly the same except there is no ermine on her gown and her headdress is red. In the Hermitage Hours, f. 129v, the scene takes place in an enclosed garden. Christ is alone with the sisters of Lazarus, the four Jewish witnesses peer over the back wall of the garden, to the left of the fountain. The roundels show the Burial of Lazarus in the left border and Mary anointing Christ‟s feet below. Madonna of Humility/Maria lactans, f. 167v (Salve Regina) (fig. 44). Mary sits on a tiled floor offering her breast to the Christ Child who looks up at her. Her head is covered by a simple white headdress. Golden rays surround the heads of both figures. In the lower right corner is a small wooden table covered by an orange/pink cloth with an open book. Behind Mary is a bench covered by a cloth that is the same colour as that in the foreground with a green bolster embroidered with gold. A plank is set on the on ends of the bench, and is just slightly higher than Mary‟s head. Behind the bench is a wooden panel flanked by stone pillars and 149 According to Dolgodrova 1983, the source of the water of life. For the history of the Manneken-Pis in Geraardsbergen see http://oudste-manneken-pis.be/geschiedenis.html (accessed 5 May 2011). 151 See E.A. de Boer, The Gospel of Mary. London: T&T Clark, 2005, p. 1-4, for the “composite Saint Mary Magdalene” in the Middle Ages. 150 30 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 surmounted by stone overhang. The left wall is grey. On the right wall is a window with open inner shutters through which a landscape is visible. The composition is almost identical to a miniature (f. 27v) in a Flemish Book of Hours, c. 1470, in the Walters Art Gallery, Baltimore (W. 208) (fig. 45), which accompanies the Mass of the Virgin.152 There are, however, a number of differences: a doorway on the left which opens into a bedroom; the overhang above the wooden panel is domed; Mary‟s head is covered by her mantle and is higher than the plank resting across the back of the bench. The Christie‟s auction catalogue relates the manuscript in Baltimore to the Tenschert Hours, but this subject does not occur there, and, as far as I could judge from the description in Randall, the composition of the other miniatures is not closely related to the depictions in XXV C 26 or the Tenschert Hours. 153 There is no depiction of this subject in the other works for private devotion with illumination by the MGB. Crucifixion, f. 174v (Passion according to John) (fig. 46). Christ hangs from a cross with the superscription in a separate frame above. He has no halo, but three groups of red rays around his head. Blood drips from his arms and flows down from the wounds in his side and feet to form a rivulet which streams onto the ground. Mary, her mantel covering her head, clasps her hands together and looks upwards towards her son. John at right in his customary red robe turns his head away from the cross. A road leads back to a nearby town (Jerusalem?). There is a star in the centre of the sky above the cross and golden rays shine down on either side above the cross piece. There is a skull and some bones on the dry earth in the foreground. The composition of the miniature in XXV C 26 is closer to the miniature by Hand C in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, f. 80r (fig. 47), which accompanies the Friday Hours of the Cross, than it is to the depictions by the MGB in the Vienna (f. 31v) (fig. 48), Hermitage (f. 18v) and Tenschert Hours (f. 21v). In both the Stuttgart manuscript and XXV C 26, the scene is more contemplative. It is the only full-page miniature in the latter where the figures are so large in relation to the setting, as if the MGB is inviting the viewer to come close and also witness the suffering of Christ. The depictions in the other Hours are more narrative, with the mourners grouped on the left side, balanced by the Roman soldiers and other witnesses on the right. The other miniatures by the MGB do have some elements in common with the depiction in XXV C 26: the cross with the superscription in a separate frame; blood dripping from the arms of Christ and the rivulet of blood flowing down the cross onto the ground and the central star and rays above the cross (Hermitage; Vienna and Tenschert rays only). The backgrounds are varied, but all show a city, most likely a reference to Jerusalem. Both the Hermitage and Vienna Hours include figures on horseback on the right. This rather lengthy series of comparisons shows that, as was common practice at the time, the MGB reuses compositions, but that he also modifies them. In some cases, such as a number of the depictions in the Tenschert Hours and XXV C 26, this is a question of adapting the composition to the space available. In other cases, however, there are more significant differences, such as the interaction between Herod and the women in the Massacre of the Innocents in the Tenschert Hours, and the dramatic difference in subject matter in the miniature accompanying the Seven Penitential Psalms also in that manuscript. The miniatures in the Hermitage Hours demonstrate that his work also contains some unusual iconography. 152 Randall 1997, pt. 1, p. 348-352 (cat. no. 270), pt. 2, pl. XXVId (colour, f. 27v), figs. 509 (f. 110v), 595 (binding). 153 Christie‟s, auction catalogue, 2 June 2004, p. 20 (under lot 14). I looked into ordering reproductions of the twelve miniatures in W. 208, but the price (over $1000) was a bit too much for my budget. 31 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 The MGB seems to have been aware of the artistic trends of his day and used the work of established artists, such as the Girart Master/Dreux Jehan and Simon Marmion, as inspiration. There are a number of visual links between the miniatures by the MGB in XXV C 26. Some of these have to do with the narrative content: the figures of the Holy Family and the donkey in the Nativity (f. 76v) are depicted in the same manner in the Flight into Egypt (f. 92v). Other links are more subtle: the cloth of honour in the Annunciation (f. 65v) appears again in a slightly different form in the Presentation in the Temple (f. 83v); the pose of the infant being held before Herod (f. 87v) recalls the Christ Child in the Nativity; the shawl worn by David (f. 97v) is similar to that worn by the figure on the right in the Presentation (f. 83v); the pattern of the tile floor in the Madonna of Humility (f. 167v) is the same as that in the Massacre of the Innocents and the cloth on Herod‟s throne is the same colour as cloth on the bench in the background of f. 167v and the exchange of glances between Mary and Jesus in f. 167v is poignantly echoed in Mary gazing at her dying son on the Cross (f. 174v). These links provide a certain level of continuity within the manuscript. The full-page miniatures by the MGB are, as it were, the icing on the cake in this Book of Hours. They demonstrate the artistic range of the MGB: his ability to depict convincingly rendered interiors and landscapes that are nearly as accomplished as those of Lieven van Lathem and Simon Marmion, narrative scenes with numerous figures and intimate images inviting contemplation. In my opinion, we see the MGB at the height of his powers in XXV C 26. Hand D – Maître Y of ÖNB, Cod. 1857? Wolf found that Hand B of the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (Hand C/Master of Gerard Brilis in XXV C 26) was identical to Maître Y, one of the border painters in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod.1857).154 She based her opinion on comments made by Antoine De Schryver at a conference on medieval manuscript illumination in the Northern Netherlands held in Utrecht in 1989. During the seminar in 2006, I found it difficult to believe that the full-page miniatures and their borders were painted by the same artist. The convincing movement of some of the figures in the borders, for example the men fighting with lions on f. 72v and 87v, was especially hard to reconcile with Hand C‟s difficulty depicting the human form except in fairly simple poses. Marrow was of the opinion that the borders in XXV C 26 were not painted by the Master of Gerard Brilis, but by an artist working in the style of Lieven van Lathem and did not see the hand of the Master of Gerard Brilis in ÖNB, Cod.1857.155 Style The borders by Hand D are painted on a plain ground, with graceful, varicoloured acanthus, stylized flowers, birds, snails, insects and occasionally human figures or animals. The colours are bright and clear and co-ordinate well with the miniatures. Dots of gold leaf, outlined in black ink with squiggles radiating from them, fill the spaces between the various elements. The borders are similar style to some of those accompanying miniatures by Lieven van Lathem in the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold (Los Angeles, Getty Museum, Ms. 37) and the Trivulzio Hours (The Hague, KB, Ms. SMC 1).156 154 Wolf 1996, p. 305. See Unterkircher and De Schryver 1969, v. 2, p. 54-55, for which artists executed which borders. 155 Marrow 2007, p. 175, 185, note 2. 156 For a discussion of the development Van Lathem‟s borders and the influence of Northern Netherlandish borders on them, see De Schryver 2008, p. 159-195. 32 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Border-Miniature relation The elements in the border, especially the birds, sometimes echo the composition in the miniature. For example, the birds in the bottom borders of f. 54v and f. 65v face each other and seem to interact in a manner which is similar to the figures in the scenes depicted, the Coronation of the Virgin and the Annunciation, respectively. In the border accompanying the Nativity (f. 76v), a brightly coloured bird dives down towards two ordinary birds. This could be an allusion to the angel announcing the birth of Christ to the shepherds in the background of the miniature. A similar parallel can be seen in the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold, f. 15v where St. Michael‟s battle with demons is echoed by a bird attacking a dragon. In this case, the position of the bird and the colour of its wings are closely related to the figure of the saint. In XXV C 26, the figure of the wild man embracing (fighting with?) the bear in the border of f. 167v (Madonna of Humility/Maria lactans) reflects the figure of Mary holding her child. 157 The monkey playing a zither in the border of f. 97v (David in penitence) could be a wry illusion to David‟s musical activities. There are a number of enigmatic figures in the borders, some of them of exceptionally high quality, such as the men fighting with lions mentioned above (f. 72v, f. 87v), a man attacking a giant snail (f. 92v),158 and a hybrid goat creature with a long curling tail, holding something in its hand (f. 110v). It might be tempting to try to read some esoteric meaning into these figures, but I think it is more likely that they are purely decorative. This conclusion is supported by a comparison of the borders in the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold and the Trivulzio Hours.159 In these two manuscripts there are a number of cases where the miniatures are very similar and the borders are quite different. There are also cases where the border motifs are similar, but accompany miniatures with entirely different subjects (see table below). It would seem that, towards the end of the 15th century, there was no set combination of miniature subjects and border themes. Manuscript Getty, Ms. 37, f. 10r Subject miniature Virgin & Child with music-making angels KB, Ms. SMC 1, f. 110v Virgin & Child with music-making angels Getty, Ms. 37, f. 14r Trinity KB, Ms. SMC 1, f. 13v Trinity Getty, Ms. 37, f.43r KB, Ms. SMC 1, f. 59v All Saints/Adoration of the Mystic Lamb All Saints/Adoration of the Mystic Lamb Border motifs Dark brown/black decoration on alternating gold/silver background (resembles tooled leather); small pale bird at left. Ape feeding cat; Fool playing stringed instrument w/dancing animals on plain ground Hybrid man (bottom)and man in armour (right) fighting dragons on gold ground Hounds killing a stag (lower right); man blowing a hunting horn (left) on plain ground Music-making angels and birds on gold ground Armed men on shaggy beasts (left, bottom) confronting one another on plain ground 157 The entry in the 1929 sales catalogue (Amsterdam, Frederik Muller, lot 41) states that these figures represent “le combat entre Valentin et Ourson.” 158 The man‟s green hat recalls that of Herod in f. 87v. 159 Reproductions available via http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=1780 (Getty, Ms. 37) and http://www.kb.nl/bladerboek/trivulzio/index.html (SMC 1) (accessed October 2011). 33 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Manuscript Getty, Ms. 37, f. 21r Subject miniature Martyrdom of St. Andrew KB, Ms. SMC 1, f.52v Celebration of the Mass Getty, Ms. 37, f.34v St. Martin and the Beggar KB, Ms. SMC 1, f.159v St. Luke painting the Virgin Getty, Ms. 37, f. 41v St. Eutropius healing the lame KB, Ms. SMC 1, f. 44v Pentecost Getty, Ms. 37, f. 48r KB, Ms. SMC 1, f. 76v Martyrdom of St. Catherine Celebration of the Mass Border motifs Pond with frog and heron; archer aiming at flying bird on plain ground Pond with frog and heron; archer aiming at flying bird on plain ground Tournament between men riding rams (bottom); man with bagpipes (left) on plain ground Tournament between men riding rams (bottom); man with bagpipes (left) on plain ground Hybrid women playing musical instruments (bottom) on plain ground Hybrid women playing musical instruments (bottom) on plain ground Men fighting with apes on plain ground Men fighting with apes on plain ground Motifs/Relationship with other mss. There are a number of elements in the borders accompanying the full-page miniatures in XXV C 26 which are related in various degrees to those in manuscripts with illumination by Lieven van Lathem, Simon Marmion and others.160 Coronation of the Virgin / Christ blessing the Virgin, f. 54v Lion with animal (pig/boar?) in its jaws at upper right similar to lion attacking bird in the bottom margin of ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 105r (fig. 49). Birds facing each other at bottom similar to birds in rights margin of ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 105r. Annunciation, f. 65v Vase with an extending support for flowers at lower left is comparable to that in the lower right corner of ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 112r (fig. 50). Rooster at upper right is virtually the mirror image of the rooster facing left in the right margin of ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 105r. Compare also the form of the acanthus at left with that in ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 105r. Presentation in the Temple, f. 83v The bird and the dragon in the bottom margin relates to the bird and dragon lower margin in ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 18r; Getty, Ms. 37, f. 15v, lower left corner, f. 31v, inner margin and the dragon at the bottom of KB, SMC 1, f. 14r. The snail near the lower left corner is practically identical with the snail next to the vase in ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 112r. 160 I have gone through the relevant reproductions a number of times, but cannot claim that this list is exhaustive. 34 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Massacre of the Innocents, f. 87v The scene of the dog lapping water from a pond with a pair of swimming ducks is reminiscent of the depictions of a pond with a frog and heron in Getty, Ms. 37, f. 21r and KB, SMC 1, f. 52v. The heron in the right margin is similar to the heron in the right margin of KB, SMC 1, f. 52v. David in penitence, f. 97v The motif of a monkey playing a zither is also found in ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 63r and in KB, SMC 1, f. 157v. Madonna of Humility/Maria lactans, f. 167v The peacock “perching” on the miniature in the center of the top margin is practically identical to the peacock in the upper left corner of ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 105r. The Raising of Lazarus, f. 112v The arrangement of the butterflies, acanthus and flowers in the left margin is closely related to the same configuration in ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 112r. Crucifixion, f. 174v The man/lion hybrid figure playing a viol at left is similar to the figure by Lieven van Lathem in the left margin of MMW 10 F 50, f. 140v. The large winged insect at right recalls the huge grasshopper in the left margin of KB, SMC 1, f. 139v. It is interesting to see how these elements are used interchangeably and in combination with various subjects in the full-page miniatures or historiated initials. This reinforces the conclusion that the relationship between the miniature subjects and border motifs was not standardized. Maître Y of ÖNB, Cod. 1857 Some of the motifs found in XXV C 26, such as a bird confronting a dragon and the musical monkey, are probably examples of themes popular at the time, and show that Hand D was up to date with the latest fashion in drôleries. However, in all of the cases where there is a very close relationship, the examples come from ff. 105r and 112r of ÖNB, Cod. 1857, the borders of which have been ascribed to Maître Y.161 In addition, it is not only the motifs which are similar, but also the execution. Even the form of the acanthus and the gold dots with squiggles between the various elements are almost identical. While it seems possible that Maître Y could have been active in the borders of XXV C 26, it is more difficult to imagine that he was responsible for the high-quality figures in the borders mentioned above. The hybrid figure playing the viol (f. 174v), for example, is so finely modelled and the face is so expressive that it would seem to me that it was done by another illuminator. Perhaps Maître Y left room in the border for another, more accomplished artist to paint these special figures, or it could be that the figures were painted first and Maître Y filled in the space around them.162 The borders accompanying the full-page miniatures could well be by an artist who contributed to Hours of Mary of Burgundy, one of the most admired Flemish Books of Hours from last quarter of the 15th century. They also compare favourably to the borders in two other luxury manuscripts, Prayer Book of Charles the Bold and the Trivulzio Hours. These three manuscripts contain illumination by some of the most notable painters of the time, Lieven van Lathem, Simon Marmion and the Vienna Master of Mary of Burgundy and their script was executed by Nicolas Spierinc, a favourite scribe of the Burgundian court. The borders in 161 Unterkircher and De Schryver 1969, v. 2, p. 54-55. The historiated initials on ff. 105r and 112r are by Lieven van Lathem (Massacre of the Innocents and Flight into Egypt, respectively). 162 An example of spaces being reserved for figures can be seen in Morgan, Ms. M .358. 35 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 XXV C 26 demonstrate the connection of the Amsterdam Hours to the crème de la crème of Flemish manuscript production. 36 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Part 2 – The Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit in XXV C 26 and the new iconography of the Virtues The new iconography of the Virtues in the Northern Netherlands The earliest Netherlandish example of the new iconography of the Virtues appears in the Short Hours of the Holy Spirit in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, c. 1460, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619.163 The manuscript was commissioned by Jan van Amerongen who was Sheriff of Utrecht 1468-1470; it was later inherited by his wife‟s cousin, Maria van Vronensteyn.164 It is considered one of the finest Books of Hours produced in the Northern Netherlands in the second half of the 15th century and contains illumination by four artists, Delaissé‟s Masters A and B, the Master of Evert Zoudenbalch and the Master of the Feathery Clouds (MFC).165 The illumination is inspired in part by Utrecht panel and wall painting and woodcuts illustrating the Biblia pauperum.166 The text is in Dutch (translation by Geert Grote). The Short Hours of the Holy Spirit (beginning on f. 74r) are preceded by the Hours of the Virgin and followed by the Hours of Eternal Wisdom.167 There is a full-page miniature of Pentecost by the Zoudenbalch Master on f. 73v. The illumination integral to the text in this section is by the MFC, including the border decoration. The MFC‟s borrowings from the Biblia pauperum are well-documented.168 In the case of the Short Hours of the Holy Spirit, he uses a typological subject associated with Pentecost for the large historiated initial (9 lines) at the beginning of the text, the Sacrifice of Elijah consumed by Flame (1 Kings 18:20-39) (f. 74r) (fig. 51), but the composition in this case is not closely related to the woodcut.169 The first Virtue, Faith, appears in the right margin of f. 74r, accompanied by a courtly hunting scene in the bottom margin. The remaining six Virtues are depicted in four-line historiated initials at the beginning of the major text divisions. They are identified by Dutch inscriptions on banderols.170 Throughout the text there are two-line historiated intials with the busts of male figures. It is not so odd to depict the Virtues in the context of the Hours of the Holy Spirit. The Hours of Catherine of Cleves (New York, Morgan Library, M. 945 and M. 917), c. 1440, regarded as “by far the most splendid and sophisticated book produced in the Northern Netherlands in the fifteenth century,” contains a series of miniatures in the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit which illustrate the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit: Wisdom, Understanding, Counsel, Fortitude, Knowledge, Piety and Fear of the Lord. 171 The gifts of the Holy Spirit were thought to be closely connected to the Virtues.172 What is unusual in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours are the strange and numerous attributes with which each Virtue is arrayed.173 163 Voelkle 1989, p. 188. Defoer et at. 1990, p. 203-206 (cat. no. 62). 165 Delaissé 1949. 166 Smeyers 1975. 167 Deschamps and Mulder 2002, p. 30. 168 See Smeyers 1975, Koch 1977, Scillia 1982, Henry 1983, Cardon and Smeyers 1989 and Cardon 1996. 169 Voelkle 1989, p. 184. The other Old Testament subject accompanying Pentecost in the Biblia pauperum is Moses receiving the Law. See Avril 1983, pl. XLIV. 170 Faith does not have a banderol. Her identity can be deduced by process of elimination. 171 Defoer et al. 1990, p. 146 and p. 152-157 (cat. nos. 45-46). List of gifts from Plummer 2002, plates 52-58. 172 Voelkle 1989, p. 187. 173 The description of the miniatures in Morgan M. 359 on the Corsair website of the Morgan Library http://utu.morganlibrary.org/medren/BrowseSingleMs.cfm?msaccno=M.359 (consulted 31 August 2011) was helpful in verifying the attributes of the Virtues. 164 37 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Faith, f. 74r (fig. 52b) is standing on a grey stone hexagonal pedestal, and looks towards the left. She wears a blue cloak lined with ermine, a brown undergarment with a black belt and a white wimple. Her arms are extended with an open book and a long twisted candle in her right hand and a pair of stone tablets in her left hand. A small church rests on her head. The figure is the largest in the series, about nine lines high. Hope, f. 78r (Prime) (fig. 53b), stands (kneels?) on a bird cage, facing left, with her arms extended. She has no hair covering and is dressed in a blue gown accented with a few gold highlights. In her right hand she holds a pair of sickles (pointing upwards and curving back towards her) and a hoe, which touches the ground. She holds a beehive in her left hand and has a sailing ship pointing towards the right on her head. The background is a blue sky, which is lighter in lower part where there are a number parallel brown lines suggesting motion. Charity, f. 83v (Terce) (fig. 54b), is atop a brazier with flames coming out of three rectangular openings, and faces towards the left with her arms extended. She has no hair covering and is dressed in a green gown. She holds a heart with the initials IHS (an abbreviation for the sacred name of Jesus) in her right hand and a sun in her left hand. There is a pelican feeding its young on her head. The background is similar to that in the initial on f. 78r. Temperance, f. 86r (Sext) (fig. 55b), is standing on the roof of a windmill, facing left with her arms extended. She wears a dark grey/black gown with a gold belt. She has a clock on top of her bare head and a bit in her mouth. The reins attached to the bit are in her right hand; she holds a large pair of spectacles in her left hand. The background is similar to the previous two initials. Justice, f. 88r (None) (fig. 56b), stands on a bed with a blue coverlet and wooden headboard and looks towards the right with her arms extended She wears a bright red gown with a pair of scales hanging from her belt. In her right hand is a spade which touches the ground. She balances a sword, pointing downward, on her left hand. There is no object on her uncovered head. The background is a blue sky with a rocky outcropping at right. Prudence, f. 90v (Vespers) (fig. 57b), stands on the ground, facing left. She wears a blue gown with a thin gold belt. She holds a mirror in her extended right hand. In her left hand, she holds a shield, decorated with the Arma Christi, close to her body. There is a sack on the ground in front of her with coins spilling out of it; a sieve stands on its edge just under the shield, and a coffin balances on her uncovered head. The background is similar to that in the first three initials. Fortitude, f. 93v (Compline) (fig. 58b), is standing on a winepress, facing towards the left with her arms extended. She wears a white head covering and a red gown with a belt similar to that worn by Prudence. She holds a dragon in her right hand and a tower in her left hand. There is an anvil on top of her head. The background is similar to that in the other initials. The MFC did not invent this idiosyncratic series of attributes; they have their origins in the new iconography of the Virtues. 38 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 French origins of the new iconography The Psychomachia of Prudentius, an early 5th century work, is an allegory of the battle between the Virtues and the Vices for the human soul.174 There are sixteen extant illuminated manuscripts of this work dating from the 9th century to 1298.175 In his classic study of the Virtues and Vices in Medieval art, Adolf Katzenellenbogen distinguishes between dynamic representations of the conflict between the Virtues and Vices and static representations of systems of Virtues and Vices, giving special attention to the cycle at Notre Dame, Paris, as an example of the latter. From the twelfth century, the classification of Virtues and Vices into the seven Cardinal or Deadly Sins, the seven Gift Virtues and the seven Cardinal and Theological Virtues became extremely popular, overshadowing the combatants of Prudentius.176 The seven sins as defined by Gregory the Great (d. 604) were regarded as the opposite of the seven Gift Virtues, related to the seven Gifts on the Holy Spirit (Isaiah 11:23).177 The three Theological Virtues, Faith, Hope and Charity, were named by the Apostle Paul in I Corinthians 13:13.178 The four Cardinal Virtues, Justice, Fortitude, Temperance and Prudence, have their roots in classical antiquity, going back to the Republic of Plato; it was Ambrose (d. 397) who first called them the Cardinal Virtues.179 In the monumental series by Giotto in the Arena Chapel, Padua, c. 1306, the seven Virtues and Vices are presented on opposite sides of the chapel in the context of the Last Judgement, where they are accompanied by objects which reflect their nature.180 Emile Mâle notes, with distaste which borders on indignation, the appearance of a new manner of representing the Virtues in France in the 15th century: Earlier we regretted that the fourteenth and fifteenth-century Virtues had no attributes by which to distinguish one from another; the same cannot be said for these. Sympathetic as we may be toward the old forms of French thought and art, we cannot but be shocked by this symbolism whose subtlety borders on incomprehensibility, and by its disconcerting lack of taste. This is what the simple and noble Virtues of our thirteenth-century cathedrals had come to! These might well be acrobats parading across a stage at a fair.181 Mâle thought that the earliest example of the new iconography appeared in a manuscript of Nicole Oresme‟s translation of Artistotle‟s Ethics, c. 1454 (Rouen, Bibliothèque municipale, Ms. 927), f. 17v.182 All seven Virtues with their various attributes are depicted in a vaulted interior space with a cloth of honour in the middle background, from left to right, Faith, Hope, Charity, Temperance, Justice, Prudence and Fortitude. Mâle was able to explain the attributes of the Cardinal Virtues on the basis of verses accompanying a miniature in a manuscript made for Jacques d‟Armagnac, Duke of Nemours, c. 1470 (Paris, Bibliothèque nationale, Ms. fr. 9186) f. 304r.183 The miniature served as a frontispiece for one of the texts in the manuscript, a French version of Martin of Braga‟s Formula Vitae Honestae.184 All of the Virtues are depicted in an interior setting, each in her own quadrant, with a verse in a frame hanging 174 See O‟Reilly 1988, p. 1-32, for a synopsis of the content of the Psychomachia. Katzenellenbogen 1989, p. 3-4 includes a list of these. 176 O‟Reilly 1988, p. 83. Table of the chief Medieval classifications of the Virtues and Vices on p. 45-46. 177 O‟Reilly 1988, p. 41-44. 178 Van Dael 2003, p. 210. 179 O‟Reilly 1988, p. 112. 180 Van Dael 2003, p. 210. See p. 211 for a description of the series. 181 Mâle 1986 [1908], p. 291. 182 Voelkle 1989, p. 185; rep. p. 190, fig. 8. 183 Mâle 1986, p. 287. Tuve 1963, p. 279, finds that the verses were not the source of the new iconography, but were probably written later as an explanation of the imagery. 184 Voelkle 1990, p. 58, rep. p. 80, fig.2. See p. 58-61 for a transcription of the French texts with English translations (prose and verse). Also rep. Voelkle 1989, p. 191, fig. 9 and Tuve 1963, pl. 33a. 175 39 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 above their heads. All are sitting except for Fortitude, who is standing as she pulls the dragon from the tower, and are in the following order, from upper left to lower left (clockwise), Prudence, Justice, Temperance and Fortitude. In an article of great erudition, Rosemond Tuve discusses an earlier example (1450) of the new iconography which accompanies a French version of selected portions of the Breviloquium de virtutibus by John of Wales, a Franciscan who wrote in the late thirteenth century (Oxford, Bodleian Library, Ms. Laud misc. 570, ff. 1-23v).185 Here three of the Cardinal Virtues are depicted with their various attributes and are accompanied by a group of young women, identified by scrolls, representing their subdivisions: f. 9v Prudence; f. 16r Temperance and f. 21v Fortitude.186 Tuve also identifies related depictions of the Cardinal Virtues in two manuscripts of Jean Mansel‟s Fleur des histoires: Brussels, KB, Ms. 9232, f. 448v and London, British Library, Add. Ms. 6797, f. 276r.187 In these miniatures, however, only selected attributes are included.188 Although Tuve was unable to identify the text from which the new iconography derived, she thought that it could “be a description, perhaps quite short, or a listing or summary or translated sketch, in the Macrobian line of descent (…) It need not be anything that belongs in a sumptuous book, designed for kings, but a tract in which the Macrobian-Ciceronian „offices‟ are carried one step beyond the definitions we find to be so commonplace, to the visible objects which now puzzle us.”189 She also suggested that the new iconography could be connected to dukes of Burgundy and “related patrons of vernacularized didactic and devotional material.”190 William Voelkle identified the earliest use of the new iconography in a French Book of Hours, c. 1430, with illumination by the Bedford Master (New York, Morgan Library, M.359).191 Here the Virtues accompany the Hours of the Holy Spirit (ff. 115v-119r). The illumination begins with a miniature of Pentecost (f. 115v) with a roundel in each corner depicting, from upper left clockwise, the Baptism of Christ, Christ sending the apostles into the world to spread the gospel, an angel administering the ointment of grace and St. Peter Preaching.192 The Virtues are depicted standing in roundels in the margins of the recto folios and in half-circular vignettes in the margins of the verso folios. Each Virtue is identified by a text in French above her head and is also connected to one of the seven petitions in the Lord‟s Prayer by means of a banderol in Latin. The prayer was recited to receive the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit.193 The Hours of the Holy Spirit are preceded by the Hours of the Holy Cross (ff. 111v-115r) with depictions of the seven sacraments in the border roundels and followed by the Office of the Dead (ff. 119v-165r) whose border roundels contain an early and extensive cycle of the Dance of Death (beginning f. 123v). The Virtues in Morgan M.359 are depicted in the same sequence as the Virtues in Rouen Ms. 927. The Theological Virtues, Faith (f. 116r) (fig. 52a), Hope (f. 116v) (fig. 53a) 185 Tuve 1963, p. 264. The text precedes Christine de Pisan‟s Epitre de’Othéa. Reproductions via http://bodley30.bodley.ox.ac.uk:8180/luna/servlet/s/t8e23q (consulted 12 September 2011). 186 The subdivisions of the Cardinal Virtues have their origins in Cicero and Macrobius, see Tuve 1963, p. 267 ff. and Voelkle 1989, p. 186. 187 Tuve 1963, p. 274, (rep. pl. 32a) and 281 (rep. pl. 34a), respectively. 188 See Bautz 1999, p. 212-213, for a series of tables comparing the attributes accompanying the Virtues in Morgan M. 359, Rouen Ms. 927, Paris Ms. 9186, Bodleian Ms. Laud misc. 570, Brussels Ms. 9232 and London ms. 6797. She omits Fortitude from M.359 in her table for that Virtue, even though it is depicted there. Furthermore, although she knows of Voelkle‟s 1989 study, Bautz does not mention the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours in her discussion of the new iconography of the Virtues (p.207-214). 189 Tuve 1963, p. 287-288. 190 Tuve 1963, p. 288-289. 191 Volkle 1989 and 1990. 192 Voelkle 1990, p. 66. Detailed description and reproductions via http://utu.morganlibrary.org/medren/BrowseSingleMs.cfm?msaccno=M.359 (consulted 13 September 2011). 193 Voelkle 1989, p. 186-187. 40 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 and Charity (f.117r) (fig. 54a), are dressed in their appropriate colours, white, green and red, respectively. The Cardinal Virtues follow the order given by Ambrose, Temperance (f. 117v) (fig. 55a), Justice (f. 118r) (fig. 56a), Prudence (f. 118v) (fig. 57a) and Fortitude (f. 119r) (fig. 58a).194 Although Voelkle was also unable to identify the precise source of the new iconography, he thought that it almost certainly originated in Paris, possibly as early as the 1420s and perhaps in the circle of John, Duke of Bedford (husband of Anne of Burgundy, the sister of Philip the Good).195 The Virtues by the MFC in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours (c. 1460) are also depicted within the context of the Hours of the Holy Spirit and in the same sequence as those in Morgan M.359. The cycles are closely related, but the former is not copied directly from the latter.196 In the case of Justice, the sword pointing upwards in the right hand of the Virtue (Morgan M. 359, f. 118r) has been replaced by a spade touching the ground (Brussels, Ms. II 7619, f. 88r).197 The backgrounds are also quite different. In Morgan M.359, Faith, Temperance and Justice are in a setting with green grass with a scattering of yellow flowering plants; behind them is a red and gold plaid cloth with a blue floral motif in the centre of the squares. Hope, Charity, Prudence and Fortitude are in an interior setting with a green tiled floor and a red cloth of honour with gold decoration against a diapered background (the cloth behind Charity is blue). In the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, the Virtues are depicted in a rather non-descript setting suggesting a landscape. Faith (f. 74r) is the only Virtue depicted in the border in that manuscript and she is considerably larger than the remaining Virtues in the historiated initials. She is not in a roundel but stands among the border decoration on a pedestal supported by a male figure. Since the Morgan manuscript remained in France until the 16th century, Voelkle suggests that the transmission of the new iconography to the Low Countries was through an intermediary somehow connected to M.359.198 About fifteen years later, the MFC, now working in the Southern Netherlands, returns to the new iconography when he depicts the Virtues accompanying the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit in XXV C 26. The Virtues in the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit in XXV C 26 (ff. 22r-24v) The Weekday Hours are the first series of texts in XXV C 26 (ff. 15r–33v). The first five Hours, all in the fourth gathering, conform to the standard sequence, but instead of the Friday Hours of the Holy Cross and the Saturday Hours of the Virgin, the last in the series is the Hours of the Passion of the Lord and the Compassion of the Blessed Mary. All of the illumination in this section is by the MFC, except for the column miniature of the Trinity on f. 15r by the Master of Willem van Bossuyt. Before discussing the depictions of the Virtues accompanying the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit, it is perhaps worthwhile to mention some of the other unusual iconography in this section. The Sunday Hours of the Holy Trinity begin, appropriately enough, with a column miniature of the Trinity (Mercy Seat). The historiated initials depict God in his role as Creator. Unlike the Creation series in the miniature by the MFC in the Utrecht History Bible (The Hague, KB, Ms. 78 D 39, f. VIIIv), these do not conform to the sequence of events described in Genesis. The first historiated initial (f. 15v) depicts God in a red robe at left pointing up towards a star-filled sky. This is identified in the description by the Byvanck 194 Voelkle 1990, p. 66-67. Voelkle 1990, p. 71-72. 196 Voelkle 1989, p. 187. 197 Perhaps the MFC unintentionally substituted the spade that is in the right hand of Hope (cf Morgan M.359, f. 116v). 198 Voelkle 1989, p. 188. 195 41 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Genootschap (BG) as the Creation of the stars (Fourth Day of Creation, Gen. 1:16).199 In the second initial (f. 16r), a figure, now in a blue robe, gestures towards a winged figure in white on the right. I am unable to connect this with any of the Days of Creation. The BG calls this “Creation: division of light and darkness/gathering of the waters below the firmament,” but this doesn‟t really correspond to what is depicted. Could it possibly be a depiction of Christ (God the Son) and the Holy Spirit, or perhaps God sending his spirit out over the waters (Gen. 1: 2)? The third initial (f. 16v) with God, again in red, in a landscape with trees seems to be the Third Day of Creation which includes the creation of plants and trees (Gen.1:9-10). The fourth initial (f. 17r) is definitely the Creation of Adam, with the spirit of God entering his nostrils (Gen. 2:7).200 This is followed by the Creation of Eve (f.17v) (Gen. 2:21-22) (fig. 59b). The sixth initial (f. 18r) in the series, which shows God and Adam in the midst of various creatures, could be Adam naming the animals (Gen. 2:20), although this is identified by the BG as the Creation of birds and fishes (Gen. 1: 20), which occurs in Genesis on the fifth day, before the creation of Man. A possible explanation of the phenomenon of the changing red and blue robe of God can be found in the depiction of the Creation of Eve in the border of the Crucifixion at the beginning of the Hours of the Holy Cross (f. 111v) in Morgan M. 359 (fig. 59c), where the Creator figure is also in blue. On the Morgan Library website, this is figure is identified as Christ-Logos.201 This would then be an allusion to John 1: 1-4, 14: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God; all things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made. (…) And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth; we have beheld his glory as of the only Son from the Father. The inclusion of God the Son in the creation initials in XXV C 26 seems entirely appropriate within the context of the Hours of the Trinity. In the Monday Hours of the Dead, the illumination is based on woodcuts from the Ars moriendi. The beginning of Matins is missing. Since the four other Weekday Hours in this gathering all begin with a column miniature, I assume that this was also the case here. The subject could have been a depiction another scene from the Ars moriendi, or possibly a burial (such as the case in the full-page miniature accompanying the Monday Hours of the Dead in the Trivulzio Hours, f. 30v), or a funeral mass (full-page miniature of this subject before the Monday Hours of the Dead in the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, f. 49v) or a depiction of Souls in Hell (like the historiated initial in the Monday Hours of the Dead, Hours of Catherine of Cleves, f. 97r).202 There could also have been an historiated initial at the beginning of Matins.203 The obvious subject of the column miniature at the beginning of the Wednesday Hours of All Saints (f.25r) would be a depiction of All Saints as is the case in the Truvulzio Hours (f. 59v) and the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (f. 64v), but instead it is the Madonna of Humility. The historiated initials depict the story of Joachim and Anna and the early life of the Virgin. 199 See Alexander Willem Byvanck Genootschap, 1993, p. 29, for all the subjects in the Creation series. In the last three historiated initials (ff. 17r, 17v and 18r) God is depicted in a blue robe. 201 http://utu.morganlibrary.org/medren/BrowseSingleMs.cfm?msaccno=M.359 (consulted 17 September 2011). It is interesting that the depiction of the Creation of Eve in XXV C 26 is closer to that in Morgan M.359 than the depiction by the MFC in KB Ms. 78 D 39 (fig. 59a). See Voelkle 1990, p. 68 for the connection of the seven virtues and gifts with Christ‟s passion. 202 As far as I could see, Verbeek 2008 offers no suggestions for the subject of the missing illumination in her thesis. 203 A column miniature plus an historiated initial for Matins occurs in the Wednesday Hours of All Saints and the Thursday Hours of the Holy Sacrament. In the Sunday Hours of the Holy Trinity and the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit, there is a decorated initial at the beginning of Matins. 200 42 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 The Thursday Hours of the Holy Sacrament start with a column miniature of a priest holding a monstrance flanked by two acolytes (f. 27r). Matins begins with an historiated initial showing a man kneeling in prayer before a table with an open book. Instead of focusing on the Eucharist, perhaps by including typological scenes and a depiction of the Last Supper, the subjects of the remaining historiated initials are slightly ambiguous.204 By including an historiated initial for Matins, it would have been possible to depict all six remaining Sacraments: Baptism, Confirmation, Confession, Ordination, Marriage and Extreme Unction.205 The description of the subjects by the BG is as follows: f. 27v, Second Sacrament, Confession; f. 28ra, Third Sacrament, Confirmation; f. 28rb, Fourth Sacrament, Eucharist (?); f. 28va, Fifth Sacrament, Ordination; f. 28vb, Sixth Sacrament, Marriage; f. 29r, Seventh Sacrament, Extreme Unction.206 While the first initial on f. 28r could represent Confirmation, it is hard to imagine that the second initial, which depicts a man lying in a bed with a red coverlet in an empty room (setting virtually identical to that in the last historiated initial in the Hours of the Dead, f. 21rb), is a depiction of the Eucharist. There is apparently nothing which could be interpreted as a depiction of the Sacrament of Baptism.207 The Hours Passion of Christ and the Compassion of the Blessed Mary (ff. 30r-33v) begin in the next gathering. The only illumination is an historiated initial depicting the Crucifixion, f. 30r. The Sunday and Thursday Hours begin depictions that relate to their subjects. The depictions in the historiated initials in these Hours are, however, either out of sequence and/or incomplete. The subject of illumination accompanying the Wednesday Hours of All Saints is totally unexpected, but follows the standard sequence in the historiated initials. It is perhaps useful to keep some of these unusual aspects in mind when discussing the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit. These begin on f. 22r with a column miniature of Pentecost showing the kneeling Virgin surrounded on both sides by the Apostles in an apse with a tiled floor. The dove of Holy Spirit appears in an aureole above them. The Virtues are depicted in four-line historiated initials beginning with Prime in the following order: Faith (f. 22va) (fig. 52c), Hope (f. 22vb) (fig. 53c), Charity (f. 23rb) (fig. 54c), Temperance (f. 23va) (fig. 55c), Justice (f. 23vb) (fig. 56c) and Fortitude (f. 24ra) (fig. 58c).208 These are practically in same order as the Virtues in Morgan M.359 and the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, but because there is a decorated initial at the beginning of Matins, there is room for only six of the seven Virtues; Prudence is missing. Thus like the Sunday Hours of the Holy Trinity and the Thursday Hours of the Holy Sacrament, the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit begin with a column miniature related to its subject and there is a missing element in the historiated initials. There are no banderols with inscriptions, but because of their similarity to the earlier depictions, the Virtues can be identified with certainty. Could the absence of inscriptions indicate that by the last quarter of the 15th century, the new iconography of the Virtues was so well known that labels seemed redundant, or did the MFC assume that, since he knew which Virtue was which, others would too? The Virtues in XXV C 26 are definitely related to those in the other two manuscripts. They appear in the same order (except for the omission of 204 The incipit refers to the Horae de sacramento pro die Iovis (i.e. “sacrament” singular (the Eucharist) not plural). 205 Each of the first five Weekday Hours is made up of seven Hours; Lauds is omitted. 206 Alexander Willem Byvanck Genootschap, 1993, p. 30. 207 I only have access to reproductions of ff. 27r and 28r, so I am unable to comment on the subjects of the other historiated initials. 208 Wolf 1996, p. 238, incorrectly identifies the figures on f. 22v as an allegory of Church and Synagogue; she doesn‟t include the four remaining historiated initials in her list of illumination. The Virtues are correctly identified in Alexander Willem Byvanck Genootschap, 1993, p. 29. 43 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Prudence) and also occur within a text devoted to the Holy Spirit. There are, however, a number of differences. The backgrounds of the historiated initials in XXV C 26 are clearly landscapes. These are varied and are quite detailed; there are even tiny boats sailing on the lake behind Fortitude. The Virtues are clearly based on those in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, but are painted in a less detailed, sketchier manner. If you hadn‟t seen the depiction in the Brussels manuscript, you might not realize that Justice was standing on a bed. In two cases, the simplification interferes with the symbolism: the pelican feeding its young on the head of Charity has become a single white bird of indeterminate species and the scales hanging from the belt of Justice have been omitted. In spite of these examples, the attributes in Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours are virtually intact in XXV C26. In one respect the depiction of Justice in XXV C26, where a correction has been made, is closer to the example in the Morgan Hours. A clear outline indicates that the sword in her right hand was pointing downwards, but this has been changed so that it now points upwards, as it does in M.359.209 Another point of reference with M.359 is the proximity of the Virtues to the seven sacraments which are depicted in the borders of the preceding text (Hours of the Holy Cross) and in XXV C 26 in the Thursday Hours of the Holy Sacrament, albeit in an incomplete form. If there was ever any significance to the colours of the garments worn by the Virtues, this must have been forgotten or overlooked by the time the new iconography reached the Low Countries: Virtue Faith M.359 White nun‟s habit Hope Green gown; white turban Red gown Blue gown Charity Temperance Justice Light brown gown; blue cloak w/ ermine lining Prudence Fortitude Blue gown; wimple Black gown; wimple Ms. II 7629 Brown gown; wimple; Blue cloak w/ermine lining Blue gown Green gown Dark grey/black gown Bright red gown Blue gown Red gown; white head covering XXV C 26 Blue gown; wimple Black cloak edged in gold Red gown; white head covering Dark grey gown Red gown Black gown; red cloak w/ermine lining n/a Blue gown In the twenty depictions, there is only once instance where the colour of the gown in the same: Prudence in blue in M.359 and Ms. II 7629 (Virtue omitted in XXV C26). The inclusion of the new iconography of the Virtues in XXV C 26 is a fascinating example of the transmission of a cycle most likely originating in France c. 1420 to the Northern Netherlands (Utrecht) in 1460 and its reuse by the same artist, the Master of the Feathery Clouds, in a manuscript made in the Southern Netherlands (Ghent) c. 1475. In each case, the Virtues are depicted in the context of the Hours of the Holy Spirit. The original source has not yet been identified, but perhaps the Holy Spirit was prominent there. The source may have been connected to the dukes of Burgundy, as suggested by Tuve and implied by Voelkle, but it must not have been too closely associated with them. Otherwise, it would 209 In the depiction of Justice in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, the MFC replaced the sword pointing upwards seen in M.359 with a spade touching the ground. 44 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 seem highly unlikely that Jan van Amerongen, a prominent member of the anti-Burgundian party in Utrecht who was even imprisoned by Bishop David of Burgundy in 1470,210 would have opted to include the new iconography in his Book of Hours. 210 Defoer et al. 1990, p. 204. 45 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Summary and Conclusion It seems safe to conclude that XXV C 26 was made on commission and not a Book of Hours produced for the open-market. The presence of so many obscure saints related to the Abbey of St. Pieters, Ghent, in the calendar indicate that the patron was closely connected to that place. The choice of texts and their order, especially the Hours of Sts. Catherine and Barbara and suffrages to the female saints preceding the Hours of the Virgin, and the extensive programme of illumination which includes some unusual iconography, support the conclusion that the manuscript was made for a specific, discerning individual. The prominent place of the female saints does not necessarily indicate that the patron was a woman. Men could also be deeply devoted to the Virgin and the female saints.211 There is an historiated initial of a man kneeling in prayer before an altar at the beginning of the prayer Dit is een sonderlinghe oratie, f. 162v. The incipit is the only Dutch text in Amsterdam Hours and the Latin text of the prayer also contains a type of decoration not found elsewhere in the manuscript. These are fairly strong indications that the prayer was especially important to the patron and that he could be the man is depicted in the historiated initial. An analysis of the oeuvres of the artists involved in the illumination and its relationship to that in other manuscripts provides insight into manuscript production in the Low Countries in the second half of the 15th century. Hand A, the Master of the Feathery Clouds (MFC) and Hand C, the Master of Gerard Brilis (MGB) both work with established artists on major commissions. When the MFC was in Utrecht in the 1460s, he collaborated with the Master of Evert Zoudenbalch on the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours (Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, c.1460) and the Bible of Evert Zoudenbalch (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 2771-2772, c. 1465). Master B of the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours worked with the MFC in Oxford, Bodleian Library, Ms. Douce 381. The Master of Gijsbrecht van Brederode also contributed to the Bible in Vienna. He and the MFC worked together again on Book of Hours (Liège, University Library, Ms. Wittert 34, c. 1465).212 The MGB made a modest contribution to the Roman de Girart de Roussillon (Vienna ÖNB Cod. 2549) where he came in contact with the Girart Master who has been identified with Dreux Jehan. In the Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch (Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162) he collaborated with Lieven van Lathem (or, Dreux Jehan/Sachsenhiem Master). Lievan van Lathem and the Girart Master both worked on Prayer Book of Philip the Good (Paris, BN, Ms. n.a. fr.16428).213 The miniature of the Visitation in XXV C 26 (f. 72v), especially the figure of Elizabeth, is closely related to the depiction of the subject on f. 46r of that manuscript. There are also connections to illumination by Lieven van Lathem in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy (Vienna, ÖNB, Cod.1857): the composition and the costumes in the full-page miniature of Christ before Pilate (f. 74v) are similar to the depiction of the Massacre of the Innocents (f. 87v) and the historiated initial of the Circumcision (f. 90r)214 is related to the miniature of the Presentation in the Temple (f. 83v). The MGB worked twice with both Antonis uten Broec, a documented Utrechter, and Gerard Brilis: in the Carthusian Bible of Herne where all three participated, with Antonis uten Broec in the Missal in Mondovi and with Gerard Brilis in the Carthusian Bible from Scheut. The motif of a couple being married in a historiated initial attributed to the Master of Gijsbrecht van Brederode in the 211 Richard de Visch van der Cappelle, for example, commissioned a painting of the Virgo inter Virgines from Gerard David, most likely for an altar dedicated to St. Catherine in the chapel of St. Anthony Abbot in the church of St. Donatian, Bruges. London, National Gallery (inv. no. NG 1432). De Visch van der Cappelle was cantor of St. Donatian (see Weed 2002, p. 177). 212 The Zoudenbalch Master also contributed to the Hours of Gijsbrecht van Brederode (Liège, University Library, Ms. Wittert 13, c, 1465-1470). 213 Wolf 1995, p. 275-279 (cat. no.11). 214 Border by Maître Y. See Unterkircher and De Schryver 1969, v. 2, p. 54-55. 46 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Bible of Evert Zoudenbalch also appears in an elongated medallion in the border by the MGB in Cod.brev 162, f. 127r.215 The script in the Tenschert Hours has been attributed to Nicolas Spierinc who also was the scribe in a Book of Hours with illumination by the MFC (Madrid, BN, Ms. Vitr. 24-10). The penwork in the calendar of XXV C 26 has been mentioned in connection with Spierinc who also provided the script for the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold, the Trivulzio Hours and the Hours of Mary of Burgundy. These three manuscripts contain illumination by Lieven van Lathem, Simon Marion and the Vienna Master of Mary of Burgundy. Although the MGB is not known to have collaborated with Simon Marmion, Marmion‟s influence on the evolution of the style of the MGB has been demonstrated. Not nearly so much is known about Hand B, the Master of Willem van Bossuyt. His name work was made for an important patron and his style is clearly influenced by the prolific Willem Vrelant, who worked in Utrecht before moving to Bruges between 1452 and 1454. If we accept that Hand D is Maître Y, a border painter active in the Hours of Mary of Burgundy, this would provide another link to the work of Lieven van Lathem. In the cases where the borders by Maître Y in the Vienna manuscript (ff. 105r and 112r) are closely related to the borders in XXV C 26, the historiated initials are by Lieven van Lathem (Massacre of the Innocents and Flight into Egypt, respectively). Another important aspect is the reuse and development of compositions and motifs. The compositions of many of the full-page miniatures by the MGB in XXV C 26 are very close to those in the Tenschert Hours. His depictions of subjects, such as the Visitation (f. 72v) and David in Penance (f. 97v), also evolve in the course of his career. Hand D is familiar with border motifs fashionable in the Low Countries during the 1470s and also borrows specific elements from the Hours of Mary of Burgundy where on several occasions he supplied the borders accompanying illumination by Lieven van Lathem. The MFC provides an example of a prolific artist who worked in both the Northern and Southern Netherlands. The Virtues accompanying the Tuesday Hours of the Holy Spirit in XXV C 26 are directly related to those in the Amerongen/Vronensteyn Hours, painted in Utrecht c. 1460 with an entirely different set of collaborators. The new iconography in these series most likely originated in France c. 1420. The description of XXV C 26 in this thesis, which highlights some of its exceptional features and which also attempts to put it into context by relating it to other manuscripts, demonstrates the kaleidoscopic interaction of artists who play different roles as they collaborate on various commissions and the bi-lateral flow of influence between the Northern and Southern Netherlands. 215 ÖNB, Cod. 2772, f. 10r. Reproduced Defoer, H.L.M. et al., 1990, p. 203, fig. 107 (under cat. no. 61). See De Schryver 2008, p. 177. 47 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Literature consulted Alexander Willem Byvanck Genootschap, Illuminated manuscripts in Dutch collections : preliminary precursor, part 2-3. The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1993. Arnould, Alain, Jean Michel Massing, Splendours of Flanders. [cat. exh.] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Bautz, Michaela, Virtvtes : Studien zu Funktion und Ikonographie der Tugenden im Mittelalter und im 16. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Verlag dissertation.de, 1999. Bergen, Saskia van, “Boeken voor de anonieme markt.” In: Leeflang, Micha … et al., Beeldschone boeken : de Middeleeuwen in goud en inkt. Zwolle: Waanders, 2009, p. 81-97. Bernard, Giovanna Giacobello, Enrica Pagella, Van Eyck, Antonello, Leonardo : tre capolavori del Rinascimento. [cat. exh.] Turin: Umberto Allemandi, 2003. Beumer, Mieke et al., Tableau van aanwinsten verworven tijdens het bibliothecariaat van prof. dr. S. van der Woude 1.1.1969 – 30.4.1977 : tentoongesteld van 2 mei to en met 14 juni 1977 : catalogus. Amsterdam: Universiteitsbibliotheek van Amsterdam, 1977. Boon, K.G., “Nieuwe gegevens over de Meester van Katharina van Kleef en zijn atelier.” Bulletin van de Koninklijke Nederlandsche Oudheidkundige Bond, 6de serie 17 (1964), kol. 242-254. Bousmanne, Bernard, Item a Giullaume Wyelant : Willem Vrelant, un aspect de l’enluminure dans les Pays-Bays méridionaux sous le mécénat des ducs de Bourgogne Philippe le Bon et Charles le Téméraire. Turnhout : Brepols, 1997. Brinkmann, Bodo, “‟Marginalia‟ on Dürer.” In Hermans, J.M.M., ed. Middeleeuwse handschriftenkunde in de Nederlanden 1988 : verslag van de Groningse Codicologendagen 28-29 april 1988. Grave: Alfa, 1989, p. 183-197. ____________ Die flämische Buchmalerei am einde des Burgunderreichs : der Meister des Dresdener Gebetbuchs und die Miniaturisten seiner Zeit. Turnhout: Brepolis, 1997. 2 vols. Brounts, Albert, Noordnederlandse miniaturen : de gouden eeuw der boekverluchting in de Noordelijke Nederlanden. [cat. exh.] Brussel: Koninklijke Bibliotheek Albert I, 1971. Buren, Anne H. van, Sheila Edmunds, “Playing cards and manuscripts: some widely disseminated fifteenth-century model sheets.” Art Bulletin, 56 (1974) 1, p. 12-30. Bussel-Eijlander, Marion van, ed., Geert Grote en de Moderne Devotie. [cat. exh.] Utrecht : Rijksmuseum Het Catharijneconvent, 1984. Byvanck, A.W., La miniature dans les Pays-Bas septentrionaux. Paris: Éditions d‟Art et d‟Histoire, 1937. Carter, David G., "The Providence Crucifixion : its place and meaning for Dutch fifteenth century painting." Bulletin of the Rhode Island School of Design, 48 (1962) 4, p. 1-40. 48 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Cardon, Bert, Manuscripts of the Speculum humanae salvationis in the Southern Netherlands (c. 1410- c. 1470). Leuven: Peeters, 1996. Cardon, Bert, Maurits Smeyers, “L„emploi de gravures par les miniaturistes, un moyen de datation et de localisation des manuscrits enluminés. Le cas du Maître des Vederwolken.” In: Schoute, Roger van, Hélène Verougstraete-Marcq, eds. Le dessin sous-jacent dans la peinture. Louvain-La-Neuve, Collège Érasme, 1989, p. 77-90, pl. 41-57. Catalogue d’une collection de manuscrits à miniatures des IXe-XVe siècles : collection d’un amateur Suisse : vente à Amsterdam le 22 novembre 1929 (…). [auction cat.] Amsterdam: Frederik Muller, 1929. (lot 41) Chavannes-Mazel, Claudine A., “De ruimte van de middeleeuwse bladzijde.” Kunstschrift, 46 (2002) 6, p. 38-45. Christie‟s, Valuable printed books and manuscripts, including natural history. [auction cat.] London, 17 November 2004. (lot 19) ___________ Valuable printed books and manuscripts, including natural history. [auction cat.] London, 2 June 2004. (lot 14) ___________ Medieval and Renaissance manuscripts. [auction cat.] London, 9 July 2001. (lot 23) Clark, Gregory T., Made in Flanders : the Master of the Ghent Privileges and manuscript painting in the Southern Netherlands in the time of Philip the Good. Turnhout: Brepols, 2000. ___________ “The Master of Fitzwilliam 268 : new discoveries and new and revisited hypotheses.” In: Morrison, E., Thomas Kren, eds. Flemish manuscript painting in context : recent research. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2006, p. 123-134. ___________ “The Montfoort Hours (Vienna, National Library of Austria, Cod. S.n.12878), Willem Vrelant and the Master of Catherine of Cleves.” In: Dückers, Rob, Ruud Priem, eds. The Hours of Catherine of Cleves : devotion, demons and daily life in the fifteenth century. [cat. exh.] [Antwerp]: Ludion, 2009, p. 126-133. Dael, Peter van, De verbeelding van het Woord : een iconografische studie. 2: de Middeleeuwen (600-1500). Kampen: Goooi en Sticht, 2003 Defoer, H.L.M. et al., The golden age of Dutch manuscript painting. [cat.exh.] New York: George Braziller, 1990. Delaissé, L.M.J., “Le livre d‟heures de Mary van Vronensteyn, chef-d‟œuvre inconnu d‟un atelier d‟Utrecht, achevé en 1460.” Scriptorium, 3 (1949), p. 230-245, pl. 25-32. ____________ “Les techniques du livre dans le bréviaire bénédictin de Grammont.” Scriptorium, 12 (1958), p. 104-107, plates 1-7. ___________ De gouden eeuw der Vlaamse miniatuur : het mecenaat van Filips de Goede, 1445-1475. [cat. exh.] Brussel: Paleis van schone kunsten, 1959. 49 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 ___________ A century of Dutch manuscript illumination. Berkeley ; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968. (California studies in the history of art ; 6) Delforge, Théodore, “Le bréviaire de Saint-Adrien de Grammont.” Scriptorium, 12 (1958), p. 102-104. De Rynck, Patrick et al., Meesterlijke middeleeuwen : miniaturen van Karel de Grote tot Karel de Stoute, 800-1475. [cat. exh.] Zwolle: Waanders, 2002. De Schryver, Antoine et al., Gent, duizend jaar kunst en cultuur [cat. exh.] Gent: Stad Gent, 1975. 3 vols. ___________“Relations et parentés entre l‟oeuvre de Liévin van Lathem et celle de Dirk Bouts et d‟Albert van Ouwater.” In: Cardon, Bert, ed. Bouts studies. Leuven: Peeters, 2001, p. 209-222. ___________ The Prayer Book of Charles the Bold : a study of a Flemish masterpiece from the Burgundian Court. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2008. Deschamps, Jan, Herman Mulder, Inventaris van de Middelnederlandse handschriften van de Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België. Brussel: Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België, 2002. (voorlopige uitgave; afl. 5) Dijk, Mathilde van, “Travelling-companion in the journey of life: Saint Barbara of Nicodemia in a Devotia Moderna context.” In: DuBruck, E.E., B.I. Gusick, eds. Death and dying in the Middle Ages. New York [etc.]: Lang, 1999, p. 221-237. (Studies in the humanities; 45) Dogaer, George, “A Utrecht book of hours from the last quarter of the fifteenth century.” In: [Gumbert, Johan Peter, Max Jan Marie de Haan, eds.] Miniatures, scripts, collections. Amsterdam: Van Gendt, 1976, p. 33-44. (Essays presented to G.I. Lieftinck; 4 Litterae textuales) ___________ Flemish miniature painting in the 15th and 16th centuries. Amsterdam: B.M. Israël, 1987. Dogaer, George, Marguerite Debae, De librije van Filips de Goede. [cat exh.] Brussels: Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1967. Dolgodrova, T.A., “Flamandskii tchsoslov XV beka iz gosudarstvennogo Ermitaja.” [The fifteenth century Book of Hours from the State Hermitage Museum] Musei, 4(1983), p. 107117. Dückers, Rob, Ruud Priem, eds. The Hours of Catherine of Cleves : devotion, demons and daily life in the fifteenth century. [cat. exh.] [Antwerp]: Ludion, 2009. Dutschke, Consuello W., Richard H. Rouse, Mirella Ferrari, Medieval and Renaissance manuscripts in the Claremont libraries. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. Duverger, Jozef, “Hofschilder Lieven van Lathem (ca. 1430-1493).” Jaarboek van het Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten, Antwerpen, 1969, p. 97-103. 50 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Farquhar, James Douglas, “Making connections in the irregular web of manuscript production of the Southern Netherlands.” Journal of the Walters Art Gallery, 54(1996), p. 135-146. Heel, Dalmatius van, Middeleeuwse handschriften op godsdienstig gebied in het bezit van de Bibliotheek der gemeente Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Stichting Vrienden van der Gemeenter Bibliotheek Rotterdam, 1948. Henry, Avril, “The living likeness : the forty-page blockbook Biblia pauperum and the imitation of images in Utrecht and other manuscripts.” Journal of the British archeological association, 136 (1983), p. 124-136, plates XVII-XLVIII. Heydeck, Kurt, Die mittelalterlichen Handschriften der Universitätsbibliothek Rostock. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001. Hoek, Klaas van der, “Antonis Rogiersz. uten Broec. Een verluchter uit Utrecht, werkzaam in de Zuidelijke en de Noordelijke Nederlanden.” Oud Holland, 117(2004)3/4, p. 119-136. Hoogewerff, G.J., De Noord-nederlandsche schilderkunst. ‟s-Gravenhage: Nijhoff, 1936 (part I). Illuminated manuscripts, concentrating on Kirby I : a Book of Hours [website] http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~pavp/genea/kirby/index.html (consulted 1 October 2008). Imbault-Huart, Marie-José et al., La médecine au Moyen age à travers les manuscripts de la Bibliothèque Nationale. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale, 1983. Irtenkauf, Wolfgang, Virgil Ernst Fiala, Codices breviarii: (cod. brev. 1-167). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1977. (Die Handschriften der Württembergischen Landesbilbliothek, Stuttgart, Erste Reihe; 3) Katzenellenbogen, Adolf, Allegories of the virtues and vices in Medieval art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989. (Medieval academy reprints for teaching; 24) (First published by the Warburg Institute, London, 1939) Ker, Neil R., Medieval manuscripts in British libraries. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969-2002. 5 vols. Knapen, Luc, Catalogue des manuscrits de l’Abbaye de Maredsous. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997, p. 8-12 (Ms. Fº/3/1-4). (Bibliotheca manuscripta monasteriorum Belgii ; 1) Koch, Robert A., “New criteria for dating the Netherlandish Biblia pauperum blockbook.” In: Lavin, Irving and John Plummer, eds., Studies in late Medieval and Renaissance painting in honor of Millard Meiss. New York: New York University Press, 1977, vol. 1, p. 283-289 (text); vol. 2, p. 98-100 (plates). Korteweg, Anne S., “The form and content of Jean de Berry‟s Books of Hours.” In: Dückers, Rob, Pieter Roelofs, eds., The Limbourg brothers : Nijmegen masters at the French court, 1400-1460. [cat. exh.] [Ghent; Amsterdam]: Ludion, 2005, p. 135-147. 51 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 ___________ “The Master of Catherine of Cleves : unique genius or teamwork?” In: Dückers, Rob, Ruud Priem, eds. The Hours of Catherine of Cleves : devotion, demons and daily life in the fifteenth century. [cat. exh.] [Antwerp]: Ludion, 2009, p.44-73. Kren, Thomas, ed., Renaissance painting in manuscripts : treasures from the British Library. New York: Hudson Hills Press, 1983. ___________ “The importance of patterns in the emergence of a new style of Flemish manuscript illumination after 1470.” In: Dekeyzer, Brigitte, Jan Van der Stock, eds., Manuscripts in transition : recycling manuscripts, texts and images. Paris [etc.]: Peeters, 2005, p.357-377. Kren, Thomas, Scot McKendrick, Illuminating the Renaissance : the triumph of Flemish manuscript painting in Europe. [cat. exh.] Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2003. Laborde, A.L.J. de, Les principaux manuscrits à peintures conservés dans l’ancienne Bibliothèque impériale publique de Saint-Pétersbourg. Paris : [s.n.], 1936-1938, pt. II, p. 179182 (cat no. 171). Leroquais, Victor, Les livres d’heures de la Bibliothèque nationale. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale, 1927. 3 vols. Suppl., Macon: Protat, 1943. Leuchtendes Mittelalter : 30 illumierte Manuskripte aus dem 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts aus Flandern und Holland. [Ramsen]: Heribert Tenschert, 2008 (Neue Folge V). Mâle, Emile, Religious art in France ; the late Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University press, 1986. (Bollingen series; XC.3) (Translation of L’Art religieux de la fin du Moyen Age en France, Paris, 1908) Marrow, James H., “Prolegomena to a new descriptive catalogue of Dutch illuminated manuscripts.” In: Elly Cockx-Indestege, Frans Hendrickx, eds., Miscellanea Neerlandica : opstellen voor dr. Jan Deschamps ter gelegenheid van zijn zeventigste verjaardag. Leuven: Peeters, 1987, vol.1, p. 295-309. ____________ “Dutch manuscript painting in context : encounters with the art of France, the Southern Netherlands and Germany.” In: Horst, K. van de, J.-C. Klamt, eds. Masters and miniatures : proceedings of the congress on medieval manuscript illumination in the Northern Netherlands (Utrecht, 10-13 December 1989). Doornspijk: Davaco, 1991, p. 53-88. (Studies and facsimiles of Netherlandish illuminated manuscripts; 3) ____________ “The Master of Gerard Brilis.” In :Hofmann, Mara, Caroline Zöhl, eds. Quand la penture était dans les livres : mélanges en l’honneur de François Avril. [Turnhout]: Brepols, 2007, p. 168-191. Masai, François, Martin Wittek, eds. Manuscrits datés conservés en Belgique : Vol 3, 14411460. Brussels: Story-Scientia, 1978. McKendrick, Scot, Flemish illuminated manuscripts, 1400-1550. London: British Library, 2003. 52 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Morrison, E., Thomas Kren, eds. Flemish manuscript painting in context : recent research. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2006. O‟Reilly, Jennifer, Studies in the iconography of the virtues and vices in the Middle Ages. New York: Garland, 1988. Pächt, Otto and J.J.G. Alexander, Illuminated manuscripts in the Bodleian Library Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966. Vol. 1, German, Dutch, Flemish, French and Spanish schools. Pächt, Otto, Ulrike Jenni, Holländische Schule. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1975. 2 vols. (Veröffentichungen der Kommission für Schrift- und Buchwesen des Mittelalters; Reihe I, Band 3) Pächt, Otto, Ulrike Jenni, Dagmar Thoss, Flämische Schule I. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1983-1990. 2 vols. (Veröffentichungen der Kommission für Schrift- und Buchwesen des Mittelalters; Reihe I, Band 6) Pagella, Enrica, Elena Rossetti Brezzi, Enrico Castelnuovo, Corti e città : arte del Quattrocento nelle Alpi occidentali. [cat. exh.] Milan: Skira, 2006. Plotzek, Joacchim M., Andachtsbücher des Mittelalters aus Privatbesitz. [cat. exh.] Köln: Schnütgen Museum, 1987. Plummer, John, The Hours of Catherine of Cleves : introductions and commentaries. New York: Braziller, 2002. Poswick, R.F. “Le bréviare de Grammont (Geraardsbergen).” Le livre et l’estampe, 43(1997)148, p. 21-112. Pumplin, Paula L., “The Communion of Saints : The Master of the Virgo inter Virgines‟ Virgin and Child with Saints Catherine, Cecilia, Barbara and Ursula. Rijksmuseum Bulletin.. 58(2010)4, p. 306-327. Raman, Anny, Pierre Cockshaw, Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België : honderdvijftigste verjaardag van de openstelling voor het publiek 21 mei 1839. [cat. exh.] Brussel: Koninklijke Bibliotheek Albert I, 1989. Randall, Lilian M.C., Medieval and Renaissance manuscripts in the Walters Art Gallery. Vol. III : Belgium, 1250-1530. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997. 2 parts. Reynaert, Jorris, Catalogus van de Middelnederlandse handschriften in de bibliotheek van de Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Gent: [Rijksuniversiteit], 1984. (Deel 1: Handschriften verworven voor 1852). Roosen-Rünge, Marie, Heinz Roosen-Rünge, Das spätgotische Musterbuch des Stephan Schriber in der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek München, Cod. icon. 420. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1981. 3 vols. Rothe, Edith, Mediaeval book illumination in Europe. London: Thames & Hudson, 1968. 53 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Rudy, Kathryn M., “The Trivulzio Hours, the Ghent Altarpiece, and the Mass as a devotional subject.” Jaarboek voor Nederlandse boekgeschiedenis, (16) 2009, p. 199-231. Scillia, Diane G. “The Master of the London Passional : Johann Veldener‟s „Utrecht cutter‟.” In: S. Hindman, ed. The early illustrated book : essays in honor of Lessing J. Rosenwald. Washington D.C.: Library of Congress, 1982, p. 23-40. Smeyers, Maurits, “Bijzondere randversieringen in een 15de-eeuws brevier.” Spiegel historiael, 4 (1969) 2, p. 72-78. ____________ “De invloed der blokboekeditie van de Biblia Pauperum op het getijdenboek van Maria van Vronensteyn.” De gulden passer, 53 (1975), p. 307-324. ___________ Vlaamse miniaturen : van de 8ste tot het midden van de16de eeuw : de middeleeuwse wereld op perkament. Leuven: Davidsfonds/Leuven, 1998. Smeyers, Maurits, Bert Cardon, “Utrecht and Bruges – South and North. „Boundless‟ relations in the 15th century.” In: Horst, K. van de, J.-C. Klamt, eds. Masters and miniatures : proceedings of the congress on medieval manuscript illumination in the Northern Netherlands (Utrecht, 10-13 December 1989). Doornspijk: Davaco, 1991, p. 89-108. (Studies and facsimiles of Netherlandish illuminated manuscripts; 3) Spantigati, Carlenrica, E. Guilio Ieni, Pio V e Santa Croce di Bosco : aspetti di una committenza papale. [cat. exh.] [Alessandria]: Edizioni dell‟Orso, 1985. Thorpe, James (intro.), Book of Hours. San Marino : Huntington Library, 1976. Thoss, Dagmar, Das Epos des Burgunderreiches Girart de Roussillon : mit der Wiedergabe aller 53 Miniaturseiten des Widmungsexemplars für Philipp den Guten, Herzog von Burgund, Codex 2549 der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek in Wien. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1989. Unterkircher, Franz, Das Stundenbuch der Maria von Burgund : Codex Vindobonensis 1857 der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1993. (Glanzlichter der Buchkunst; 3) Unterkircher, Franz, Antoine De Schryver, Gebetbuch Karls des Kühnen vel potius Stundenbuch der Maria von Burgund : Codex Vindobonensis 1857 der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek. Graz : Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1969. 2 vols. Vanwynsberghe, Dominique, “Simon Marmion : III: L‟œuvre enluminé.” In A. Chatelet et al., Valenciennes aux XIVe et XVe siècles : art et histoire. Valenciennes: Presses universitaires de Valenciennes, 1996, p. 169-179. Verbeek, Ellie, De kunst van het sterven in miniatuur : afbeeldingen van de Ars moriendi in een Vlaams handschrift uit ca. 1475. Masterscriptie Kunstgeschiedenis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2008. Vermeeren, P.J.H., “Het Passyonael van den heyligen in het Brits Museum te Londen Add. Ms. 18162.” Het boek, 33(1959), p. 193-210. 54 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Vijftien jaaraanwinsten sedert de eerste steenlegging tot de plechtige inwijding van de Bibliotheek. [cat. exh.] Brussels: Koninklijke Biblotheek Albert I, 1969. Voelkle, William, “Morgan M.359 and the origin of the „new iconography‟of the Virtues in the fifteenth century.” In: S.A. Stein and G.D. McKee, eds., Album amicorum Kenneth C. Lindsay : essays on art and literature. Binghamton, NY: SUNY Binghamton, 1990, p. 57-90. ____________“The Amerongen/Vronensteyn hours (Brussels MS II 7619), Morgan M.359, and the new iconography of the Virtues.” In: Horst, K. van de, J.-C. Klamt, eds. Masters and miniatures : proceedings of the congress on medieval manuscript illumination in the Northern Netherlands (Utrecht, 10-13 December 1989). Doornspijk: Davaco, 1991, p. 183193. (Studies and facsimiles of Netherlandish illuminated manuscripts; 3) Weed, S.E., The Virgo inter Virgines : art the devotion to virgin saints in the Low Countries and Germany, 1400-1530, Dissertation Philadelphia, 2002. Wieck, R. S., Time sanctified : the Book of Hours in Medieval art and life, 2nd ed. New York: George Braziller, 2001. Wolf, Eva, Das Bild in der spätmittelalterlichen Buchmalerei : das Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch im Werk van Lievin van Lathems. Hildesheim; New York: G. Olms, 1996. Wormald, Francis, Phyllis M. Giles, A descriptive catalogue of the additional illuminated manuscripts in the Fitzwilliam Museum acquired between 1895 and 1979 (excluding the McClean collection). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 2 vols. Wüstefeld, Wilhelmina C.M., C.J.F. van Schooten, Middeleeuwse boeken van Het Catharijneconvent. Zwolle: Waanders, 1993. Zimina, O. G., E.A. Anisimova, Iskusstvo zapadnoevropeiskoi rukopisnoi knigi V-XVI vv. [Art of V-XVI century European manuscripts. cat. exh.] Sankt-Peterburg : Izd-vo Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha, 2005. 55 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Appendix 1 – Codicological description 56 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Codicological description University Library Amsterdam (UBA), Ms. XXV C 26216 Book of Hours, Use of Rome, in Latin Content 1. Calendar, f. 2v-14r 2. Horae de Sancta Trinitate pro die dominica, f. 15r-18v 3. Horae pro fidelibus defunctis, f. 18v-21v 4. Horae de Sancto Spiritu, f. 22r-24v 5. Horae de omnibus sanctis, f. 25r-27r 6. Horae de sacramento pro die Iovis, f. 27r-29r 7. Horae de passione domini et de compassione beatae mariae, f. 30r-33v 8. Oratio veneribilis bede, f. 33v-36v 9. Oratio ad dominum, f. 36v-37r 10. Oratio devota ad dominum, f. 37r-41r 11. Horae de sancta Katherina, f. 41v-45v 12. Horae de sancta Barbara, f. 46r-48v 13. Suffrages to female saints, f. 49r-53v 14. Horae beatae Mariae secundum usum romanae curiae, f. 54v-96r 15. Septem psalmum and litany, f. 97v-109r 16. Vigilie pro fidelibus defunctis, in nocturnen, f.110v-135r 17. Commendationes, f. 136r-139r 18. In die *cu.ar* non dicitur tunc roget sacerdos pro eo, f. 139r-139v 19. [unknown ; no rubric], f. 139v-141r 20. Ad proprium angelum, f. 141r-141v 21. Orationes de Beata Maria Virgine, f. 141v-142r 22. Alia oratio de sancta Maria (Obsecro te), f. 142r-144r 23. Oratio de nostra domina (O intemerata), f. 144r-145r 24. In purificatione Mariae, f. 145v 25. In annunciatione Mariae, f. 145v-146r 26. Suffrages to male saints, f.147r-155v 27. Oratio de sancto Thoma, f. 156r 28. Oratio in circumscisione Domini, f. 156r 29. Oratio in epiphania Domini, f. 156v-157r 30. Suffrage to St. Julian, f. 157r 31. Suffrage to St. Paul the Hermit, f. 157r 32. Suffrage to St. Vincent, f. 157v-158r 33. Oratio in conversione sancti Pauli, f. 158r 34. Suffrage to St. Blasius, f. 158r 35. Suffrage to St. Amand, f. 158r-159v 36. Oratio de cathedra sancti Petri, f. 159r-159v 37. Suffrages to male saints, f. 159v-161v 38. Oratio ad faciem Christi, f. 162r-162v 39. Een sonderlinghe oratie, f. 162v-163v 40. Oratio si quis habens tribulationem, f. 163v-165r 216 The codicological description is in large part based on the Totaalschema hs. XXV C26 by Jos Biemans and the Codicologische beschrijving handschrift Amsterdam, UBA XXV C26 by Mark Aussems, both of which were prepared in connection with the seminar, Het middeleeuwse boek, University of Amsterdam, September 2006. I am deeply indebted to the authors. 57 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 41. Oratio de 10,000 maritibus, f. 165r-166v 42. Salve regina, f. 167v-171r 43. Oratio de beati Georgii, f. 172r-172v 44. Oratio, f. 172v 45. Oratio [no rubric], f. 172v-173r 46. Passio Domini nostri Jesu Christi, secundum Johanni, f. 175r-180r Location and date Ghent,217 c. 1475. Material and construction Parchment, i + 181 + i folios, modern pagination in pencil, 24 gatherings with modern signatures in pencil a-aa, 18 [1-8], 26 [9-14], 38-1 [15-21 (minus 1 after 18)], 4-78 [22-53], 88+1 [54-62 (plus 1 after 53)], 98+1 [63-71 (plus 1 after 64)], 108+1+1 [72-81 (plus 1 after 72; plus 1 after 75)], 118+1+1 [82-91 (plus 1 after 82; plus 1 after 86)], 124+1 [92-96 (plus 1 after 96)], 138+1 [97-105 (plus 1 after 96)], 146+1+1 [106-113 (plus 1 after 109; plus 1 after 112)], 15-178 [114-137], 188+1 [138-146 (plus 1 after 145)], 196+1 [147-153 (plus 1 after 149)], 208 [154161], 218+1+1 [162-171 (plus 1 after 166; plus 1 after 170)], 222 [172-173], 232 [174-175], 246 [176-181], 190 x 140 (107 x 88) mm, 2/23 (gathering 6, 2/22; calendar written in one column), ruled in red (in purple only in gathering 6). Script Littera hybrida (bastarda), one hand. Rubrication and decoration Standard rubrication. The beginning of a text is signalled by an historiated initial (see below under Illumination) or a decorated initial 4 to 5 lines high, alternately on a blue or light terra cotta, or, less frequently, red ground, highlighted with filigree in gold or white paint. The smaller initials, one or two lines high, and line endings are executed in the same manner. An initial “I” or “J” is sometimes as long as 12 or 13 lines (f. 66v, f. 27r, respectively). Illumination 11 full-page miniatures; 22 column miniatures; 1 two column miniature, 89 historiated initials, 4-5 lines high. Illumination executed by four hands: Hand A is responsible the historiated initials, borders and column miniatures in gatherings 3 (except for the column miniature on f. 15r), 4, 6, 13, 14, 18 (except for the column miniature on f. 145r) and 19; Hand B is responsible for the historiated initials, borders and column miniatures in gatherings 3 (only the column miniature on f. 15r), 5, 7-12, 17, 18 (only the column miniature on f. 145v), and 20-22, including the two column miniature on f. 175r; Hand C is responsible for the full-page miniatures (f. 54v, f. 65v, f. 72v, f. 76v, f. 83v, f. 87v, f.92v, f. 97v, f. 110v, f. 167v, f. 174v). Hand D is responsible for the borders accompanying the full-page miniatures. Binding 18th century red morocco, gilt, “Sterbinderij,” The Hague, c.1760-70.218 217 According to Marrow 2007, p. 175 the “graded liturgical calender” contains “many rare entries of saints whose relics were venerated in Sint-Pieters Abbey in Ghent.” See p. 7-8 for a list of these saints. 218 Beumer 1977, p. 12. 58 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Provenance An annotation on f. 181v states that the manuscript belonged to Marie Hardis, the wife of Martin Matruut, a Bruges merchant. Later owned by her daughter, Adriane Matruut, who in 1559 was a nun in the convent of Sint Magriet in Deinze, near Ghent. An 18th century annotation refers to familial relationship to Cardinal Madrutius, who participated in the Council of Trent in 1554.219 Arnold Mettler, St. Gall. His anonymous sale Amsterdam, 22 November 1929 (lot 41).220 Acquired by the University Library Amsterdam (UBA) (accession number 3765) during the period when S. van der Woude was Librarian (19691977).221 The number 22 appears in pencil on the inside front cover, perhaps a shelf mark or lot number. Literature Alexander Willem Byvanck Genootschap, Illuminated manuscripts in Dutch collections : preliminary precursor, part 2-3. The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1993, p. 29-31. Belinfante, Judith C.E. and Astrid C.Balsem, Amsterdam in de wereld - De wereld in Amsterdam. [cat. exh.] Amsterdam: Universiteitsbibliotheek, Bijzondere Collecties, 2007, p. 80 (cat. no. 34). Beumer, Mieke et al., Tableau van aanwinsten verworven tijdens het bibliothecariaat van prof. dr. S. van der Woude 1.1.1969 – 30.4.1977 : tentoongesteld van 2 mei to en met 14 juni 1977 : catalogus. [cat. exh.] Amsterdam: Universiteitsbibliotheek van Amsterdam, 1977, p. 12-13 (cat. no. I-3). Brinkmann, Bodo, Die flämische Buchmalerei am einde des Burgunderreichs : der Meister des Dresdener Gebetbuchs und die Miniaturisten seiner Zeit. Turnhout: Brepolis, 1997, vol.1, p. 238 (note 16). Catalogue d’une collection de manuscrits à miniatures des IXe-XVe siècles : collection d’un amateur Suisse : vente à Amsterdam le 22 novembre 1929 (…). [auction cat.] Amsterdam: Frederik Muller, 1929, p. 20-21 (lot 41). Chavannes-Mazel, Claudine A., “De ruimte van de middeleeuwse bladzijde,” Kunstschrift, 46 (2002)2, p. 39, fig. 37 (f. 87v) Christie‟s, Valuable printed books and manuscripts, including natural history. [auction cat.] London, 2 June 2004, p. 20 (under description of lot 14). De Schryver, Antoine, The Prayer Book of Charles the Bold : a study of a Flemish masterpiece from the Burgundian Court. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2008, p. 76 (oblique reference to work by the Master of the Feathery Clouds for the Abbey of Saint Peter in Ghent, citing Marrow, 1987). Dogaer, George, Flemish miniature painting in the 15th and 16th centuries. Amsterdam: B.M. Israël, 1987, p. 133, 136. 219 Beumer 1977, p. 13. Marrow 2007, p. 187 (note 19). 221 Beumer 1977. 220 59 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Kren, Thomas, Scot McKendrick, Illuminating the Renaissance : the triumph of Flemish manuscript painting in Europe. [cat. exh.] Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2003, p. 131, note 14 (reference to Wolf, 1996 (cat. no. 1)). Leuchtendes Mittelalter : 30 illumierte Manuskripte aus dem 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts aus Flandern und Holland. [Ramsen]: Heribert Tenschert, 2008 (Neue Folge V), p. 67. Marrow, James H., “Prolegomena to a new descriptive catalogue of Dutch illuminated manuscripts.” In: Elly Cockx-Indestege, Hendrickx, Frans, eds., Miscellanea Neerlandica : opstellen voor dr. Jan Deschamps ter gelegenheid van zijn zeventigste verjaardag. Leuven: Peeters, 1987, vol.1, p. 308 (note 27). ____________ “The Master of Gerard Brilis.” In :Hofmann, Mara, Caroline Zöhl, eds. Quand la penture était dans les livres : mélanges en l’honneur de François Avril. [Turnhout]: Brepols, 2007, p. 175-176, 187-188 (notes 19-25) and passim. Randall, Lilian M.C., Medieval and Renaissance manuscripts in the Walters Art Gallery. Vol. III : Belgium, 1250-1530. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, part 1, p. 351 (under description of Ms. W. 208 (cat. no. 270)). Rudy, Kathryn M., “The Trivulzio Hours, the Ghent Altarpiece, and the Mass as a devotional subject,” Jaarboek voor Nederlandse boekgeschiedenis, (16) 2009, p. 204, 209 (col. illus. 1) Verbeek, Ellie, De kunst van het sterven in miniatuur : afbeeldingen van de Ars moriendi in een Vlaams handschrift uit ca. 1475. Masterscriptie Kunstgeschiedenis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2008. Wolf, Eva, Das Bild in der spätmittelalterlichen Buchmalerei : das Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch im Werk van Lievin van Lathems. Hildesheim; New York: G. Olms, 1996, p. 237-240 (cat. no.1) and passim. Exhibitions Amsterdam, Library of the University of Amsterdam, Tableau van aanwinsten verworven tijdens het bibliothecariaat van prof. dr. S. van der Woude 1.1.1969 – 30.4.1977, 2 May – 14 June 1977. Amsterdam, Special Collections, Library of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam in de wereld – de wereld in Amsterdam, 12 May – 16 September 2007. 60 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Appendix 2 – Overview of UBA Ms. XXV C26 61 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Overview, UBA Ms. XXV C26222 Gathering (signature) 1 (a) Folios Remarks Text 1-8 1v is blank 1r inscription/prayer 2r Signature of owner (illegible) 2 (b) 3 (c) 9-14 15-21 14 v is blank Calendar (2v to 14r) 15r: Horae de Sancta Trinitate pro die dominica (to18v) Remains of removed page visible between 18 and 19. Beginning of matins missing from Horae pro fidelibus defunctis 222 18v: Horae pro fidelibus defunctis (to 21v) Illumination Hand 15r Mercy Seat (column min.) Matins 15v Creation of light (the stars?) (hist. init.) Prime 16r Creation: division of light and darkness/ gathering of waters (?)(hist. init.) Terce 16v Creation of the trees (hist. init.) Sext 17r Creation of Adam (hist. init.) None 17v Creation of Eve (hist. init.) Vespers 18r Adam naming the animals (hist. init.) Compline B A A 19r Deathbed: priest and dying man; towers at left, small building (shrine?)with little man on horseback at foot of bed (hist. init.) Prime 19v Deathbed: dying man with stick in his hand; man and woman at left making gestures of alarm. Afraid of object/creature at foot of bed?(hist. init.) Terts 20r Deathbed: dying man looking at crucifix; man kneeling at foot of bed (hist. init.) Sext A 20v Deathbed: dying man, three figures at left (hist. init.) None 21ra Deathbed: dying man, two figures at left; devils throwing souls into Hell at foot of bed (hist. init.) Vespers 21rb Deathbed: dying man, Christ on the cross flanked by Mary and John; devil walking away at left (coverlet changes from green to red) (hist. init.) Compline A A A A A A A A A The overview is in large part based on the Totaalschema hs. XXV C26 by Jos Biemans and the Codicologische beschrijving handschrift Amsterdam, UBA XXV C26 by Mark Aussems, both of which were prepared in connection with the seminar, Het middeleeuwse boek, University of Amsterdam, September 2006. I have also made extensive use of Angelika M. Bisseling et al., Illuminated manuscripts in Dutch collections : preliminary precursor, part 2-3. The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 1993, p. 29-31. 4 (d) 5 (e) 22-29 30-37 29v is blank 22r: Horae de Sancto Spiritu (to 24v) 22r Pentecost (col. min.) Matins 22va Fides (hist. init.) Prime 22vb Spes (hist. init.) Terce 23r Caritas (hist. init.) Sext 23va Temperantia (hist. init.) None 23vb Justitia (hist. init.) Vespers 24r Fortitudo (hist. init.) Compline A A A A A A A 25r: Horae de omnibus sanctis (to 27r) 25r Madonna of Humility (col. min.) 25ra Joachim’s offer refused (hist. init.) Matins 25va Meeting at the Golden Gate (hist. init.) Prime 25vb Birth of Mary (hist. init.) Terce 26ra Presentation of Mary in the temple (hist. init.) Sext 26rb Mary weaving in the temple (hist. init.) None 26va Joseph and young men putting rods on the altar (hist. init.) Vespers 26vb Marriage of Mary and Joseph (hist. init.) Compline A A A A A A A 27r: Horae de sacramento pro die Iovis (to 29r) 27r Priest with monstrance (col.min.) 27ra Praying man (hist.init.) Matins 27v Confession (hist.init.) Prime 28ra Confirmation (hist.init.) Terce 28rb Man in bed (hist.init.) Sext 28va Ordination (hist.init.) None 28vb Marriage (hist.init.) Vespers 29r Extreme unction (hist.init.) Compline A A A A A A A A 30r: Horae de passione domini et de compassione beatae mariae (to 33v) 33v: Oratio veneribilis bede (to 36v) 36v: Oratio ad dominum (to 37r) 37r: Oratio devota ad dominum(to 41r) 30r Crucifixion (hist. init.) A 34r Priest and novice (Bede?) (hist. init.) A 37r The risen Christ (hist. init.) A 63 A P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 6 (f) 7 (g) 38-45 41v: Horae de sancta Katherina (to 45v) 46-53 46r : Horae de sancta Barbara (to 48v) 49r :Suffrage to St. Apollonia (to 49v) 49v: Suffrage to St. Margaret (to50r) 50v: Suffrage to St. Mary Magdalene (to 51r) 51r: Suffrage to St. Elizabeth of Hungary (to 51v) 51v: Suffrage to St. Anne (to 52ra) 52va: Suffrage to St. Christina (to 52v) 52vb: Suffrage to St. Pharahildis (to 53r) 53r: Suffrage to St. Amalberga (to 53v) 53v : Suffrage to St. Gertrude (to 53v) 8 (h) 54-62 54r is blank 9 (i) 63-71 Signature incorrectly placed on 64r 54v: Horae beatae Mariae secundum usum romanae curiae (to 96r) 64 41v St. Catherine (col.min.) Matins 42r St. Catherine disputing with philosophers (hist. init.) Prime 42v Scourging of St. Catherine (hist. init.) Terce 43r St. Catherine’s breasts torn with shears (hist. init.) Sext 43v St. Catherine praying before the wheel (hist. init.) None 44ra Beheading of St. Catherine (hist. init.) Vespers 44rb St. Catherine lifted from her grave by two angels (hist. init.) Compline 46r St. Barbara (col.min.) Matins 46v Beheading of St. Barbara (hist. init.) Prime 49r St. Apollonia (col.min.) A A 49v St. Margaret (col.min.) B 50v St. Mary Magdalene (col.min.) B 51r St. Elizabeth of Hungary (col.min.) B 51v Anne selbdritt (col.min.) B 52va St. Christina (col.min.) B 52vb St. Pharahildis (hist. init.) B 53r St. Amalberga (hist. init.) B 53v St. Gertrude (hist. init.) B 54v Coronation of the Virgin (full page min.) 55r Annunciation (hist. init.) Matins C/D B 65v Annunciation (full page min.) 66r Visitation (hist. init.) Lauds C/D B A A A A A B B B P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 10 (k) 72-81 No full page miniature before Sext. 72v Visitation (full page min.) 73r Nativity (hist. init.) Prime 76v Nativity; Annunciation to the Shepherds (full page min.) 77r Annunciation to the Shepherds (hist. init.) Terce 80r Circumcision (hist. init.) Sext 83v Presentation in the temple (full page min.) 84r Adoration of the Magi (hist. init.) None 87v Massacre of the Innocents (full page min.) 88r Massacre of the Innocents (hist. init.) Vespers 92v Flight into Egypt (full page min.) 93r Flight into Egypt (hist. init.) Compline 97v David in prayer (full page min.) 98r David (hist. init.) sees Bathsheba bathing (in margin) 110v Raising of Lazarus (full page min.) 111r Soul taken up into heaven (hist. init.) C/D B C/D B B C/D B C/D B C/D B C/D A C/D A 11(l) 82-91 12 (m) 92-96 13 (n) 97-105 97r is blank 14 (o) 106113 114121 122129 130137 138146 109v and 110r are blank 97v: Septem psalmum and litany (to 109r) 110v: Vigilie pro fidelibus defunctis, in nocturnen (to 135r) 135v is blank 136r : Commendationes (to139r) 136r Angels carrying souls to heaven (col. min.) B 146v is blank 139r: In die *cu.ar* non dicitur tunc roget sacerdos pro eo (to139v) 139v:[unknown (to 141r)] 141r: Ad proprium angelum (to141v) 141v : Orationes de Beata Maria Virgine (to 142r) 142r: Alia oratio de sancta Maria (to 144r) (Obsecro te) 144r: Oratio de nostra domina (to 145r) (O intemerata) 145v: In purificatione Mariae (to 145v) 145v: In annunciatione Mariae 139v Praying monks (hist. init.) A 141r Traveller with guardian angel (hist. init.) A 142r Madonna on the crescent moon (col. min.) A 144r Mary and St. John the Evangelist (hist. init.) A 145v Presentation in the temple (col. min.) B 15 (p) 16 (q) 17 (r) 18 (s) 65 (to 146r) P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 19 (t) 20 (u) 147153 154161 147r: Suffrage to St. James the Great (to 147v) 147v: Suffrage to St. Anthony Abbot (to 148r) 148ra: Suffrage to St. Christopher (to 148v) 149r: Suffrage to St. Sebastian (to 149v) 149v: Suffrage to St. George (to 149v) 150r: Suffrage to St. Adrian (to 150v) 150va: Suffrage to St. Stephen (to 150v) 150vb: Suffrage to St. Livinius (to 151r) 151va: Suffrage to St. Bavo (to 151vb) 151vb: Suffrage to St. Macarius (to 152v) 152va: Suffrage to St. Piatus (to 152v) 152vb: Suffrage to St. Job (to 153ra) 153rb: Suffrage to St. Cornelius (to 153va) 153v: Suffrage to St. Daniel (to 154ra) 154ra: Suffrage to St. Andrew (to 154rb) 154rb: Suffrage to St. Nicholas (to 154va) 154v: Suffrage to St. Nichasius (to 155ra) 155ra: Suffrage to St. Lazarus (to 155rb) 147r St. James the Great (col. min) A 147v St. Anthony Abbot (col. min) A 148r St. Christopher (col. min) A 149r St. Sebastian (col. min) A 149v St. George and the dragon (col. min) A 150r St. Adrian (col. min) Martyrdom of St. Adrian (margin) 150va St. Stephen (hist. init.) A 150vb St. Livinius (hist. init.) A 151va St. Bavo (hist. init.) A 151vb St. Macarius (hist. init.) A 152va St. Piatus (hist. init.) A 152vb Job on the dunghill (hist. init.) A 153r St. Cornelius (hist. init.) A 153v Daniel in the lion’s den (hist. init.) A 154ra St. Andrew (hist. init.) B 154rb St. Nicholas (hist. init.) B 154v St. Nichasius hist. init.) B 155ra St. Lazarus (hist. init.) B A B 66 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 20 (u) (cont.) 21 (x) 162171 167r is blank 171v is blank 155rb: Suffrage to St. Egidius (to 155v) 156ra: Oratio de sancto Thoma 156va) 156va: Oratio in circumscisione Domini (to 156vb) 156vb: Oratio in epiphania Domini (157ra) 157ra: Suffrage to St. Julian (to 157rb) 157rb: Suffrage to St. Paul the Hermit (to 157va) 157va: Suffrage to St. Vincent (to 158ra) 158ra: Oratio in conversione sancti Pauli (to 158rb) 158rb: Suffrage to St. Blasius (to 158vb) 158v:Suffrage to St. Amand (to 159ra) 159r: Oratio de cathedra sancti Petri (to 159va) 159va: Suffrage to St. Matthias (to 159va) 159vb: Suffrage to St. Alexander (160ra) 160ra: Suffrage to St. Gregory (to 160rb) 160va: Suffrage to St. Quirinus (to 160va) 160vb: Suffrage to St. Victor (to 161ra) 161ra: Suffrage to St. Bernardino (to 161va) 162ra: Oratio ad faciem Christi (to 162vb) 155rb St. Egidius (hist. init.) B 156r St. Thomas (hist. init) B 156va Circumcision (hist. init) B 156vb Adoration of the Magi (hist. init) B 157ra St. Julian with his wife ferrying Christ across the river (hist. init) 157rb St. Paul the Hermit (hist. init) B 157v St. Vincent (hist. init) B 158ra Conversion of St. Paul (hist. init) B 158rb St. Blasius (hist. init) B 158v St. Amand (hist. init) B 159r St. Peter on bishop’s throne (hist. init) B 159va St. Matthias (hist. init) B 159vb St. Alexander (hist. init) B 160r St. Gregory (hist. init) B 160va St. Quirinus (hist. init) B 160vb St. Victor (hist. init) B B 161r St. Bernardino (hist. init) 162r Holy Face (hist. init.) B B 67 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 21 (x) (cont.) 22 (y) 172173 173v is blank 23 (z) 174175 174r is blank 24 (aa) 176181 181r is blank 162vb: Een sonderlinghe oratie (to163va)(text of prayer in Latin) 163va:Oratio si quis habens tribulationem (to165ra) 165rb: Oratio de 10,000 maritibus (to166v) 167v: Salve Regina (to171r) 172ra: Oratio de beati Georgii (to 172va) 172va: Oratio (to172vb) 172vb:Oratio (to 173r) 162v Man kneeling with book in hands (hist. init.) B 163v Salvator Mundi (hist. init.) B 165r 10,000 martyrs of Mt. Ararat (col. min.) C/D 175r : Passio Domini nostri Jesu Christi, secundum Johanni (to180r) 180v [probationes pennae] 181v [annotations concerning ownership] 174v Crucifixion with Mary and St. John (full page min.) 175r Two angels with Arma Christi (two col. min.) 68 167v Maria lactans (full page min.) C/D B P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Figures List of Figures Fig. 1 Master of Gerard Brilis, Coronation of the Virgin, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 54v Fig. 2 Simon Marmion, Coronation of the Virgin, San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 1173, f. 61r Fig. 3a Penwork calendar, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 8v Fig. 3b Penwork calendar, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 11r Fig. 4a Initial D, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 41v Fig. 4b Initial M, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 46r Fig 4c Initial S, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 147v Fig. 4d Initial S, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 50v Fig. 5 Master of the Feathery Clouds, St. Adrian, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 150r Fig. 6 Master of the Feathery Clouds, St. James, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 147r Fig. 7 Master of the Feathery Clouds, David in his palace (historiated initial); Bathsheba (roundel), Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 98r Fig. 8 Master of Gerard Brilis, Madonna and Child with two female saints, Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162, f. 95r Fig. 9a Master of the Feathery Clouds, Madonna of Humility, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 25r Fig. 9b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Madonna on the Crescent Moon, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 142r Fig. 10 Willem Vrelant, Mercy Seat/Trinity, The Hague, KB, Ms. 76 F 7, f. 15v (Page 15, MWvB, style) Fig. 11 Master of Willem van Bossuyt, Mercy Seat/Trinity, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 15r (Page 15, MWvB, style) Fig. 12 Willem Vreelant, St. Catherine, The Hague, KB, Ms. 76 F 7, f. 27v Fig. 13 Master of Willem van Bossuyt, St. Christina, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 52va Fig. 14a Master of Willem van Bossuyt, Visitation, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 66r Fig. 14b Master of Willem van Bossuyt, Angels carrying souls to heaven, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 136r Fig. 15 Master of Willem van Bossuyt, Arma Christi, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 175r 70 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Fig. 16 Master of Gerard Brilis, Visitation, St. Petersburg, Hermitage, Graphic arts department, Ms. 6, f. 65v Fig. 17 Master of Gerard Brilis, Scenes relating to the miracle of the shrine of St. Adrian, Maredsous, Bibl. de l‟Abbaye, Ms. Fº 3/4, f. 1r Fig. 18 Master of Gerard Brilis, St. Christopher, Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162, f. 158r Fig. 19 Master of Gerard Brilis, Coronation of the Virgin, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 43v Fig. 20 Master of Gerard Brilis, Coronation of the Virgin, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. S.n. 12908, f. 45r Fig. 21 Master of Gerard Brilis, Virgin and Child with Saints Catherine and Barbara, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. S.n. 12908, f. 44v Fig. 22 Master of Gerard Brilis, Annunciation, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 65v Fig. 23 Hand C Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, Annunciation, Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162, f. 87v Fig. 24 Master of Gerard Brilis, Annunciation, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 53v Fig. 25 Master of Gerard Brilis, Visitation, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 72v Fig. 26 Master of Gerard Brilis, Visitation, f 70v; Typological scene, f. 71r, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland Fig. 27 Gerart Master (Dreux Jehan?), Visitation, Paris, BNF, Ms. n.a. fr.16428, f. 46r Fig. 28 Master of Gerard Brilis, Nativity/Annunciation to the shepherds, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 76v (Page 26, MGB in XXV C26) Fig. 29 Master of Gerard Brilis, Nativity/Annunciation to the Shepherds, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 88v Fig. 30 Master of Gerard Brilis, Presentation in the Temple, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 83v Fig. 31 Master of Gerard Brilis, Presentation in the Temple, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 95v Fig. 32 Lieven van Lathem, Circumcision, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 90r Fig. 33 Master of Gerard Brilis, Massacre of the Innocents, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 87v 71 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Fig. 34 Lieven van Lathem, Christ before Pilate, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 74v Fig. 35 Master of Gerard Brilis, Massacre of the Innocents, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 118v Fig. 36 Master of Gerard Brilis, Flight into Egypt, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 92v Fig. 37 Master of Gerard Brilis, Flight into Egypt, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 130v Fig. 38 Master of Gerard Brilis, David in penitence, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 97v Fig. 39 Master of Gerard Brilis, David in prayer, Maredsous, Bibl. de l‟Abbaye, Ms. Fº 3/3, f. 25r Fig. 40 Master of Gerard Brilis, David in penitence, Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Cod.brev.162, f. 104r Fig. 41 Master of Gerard Brilis, Michal helping David escape from Saul‟s servants, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 139v Fig. 42 Master of Gerard Brilis, Raising of Lazarus, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 110v Fig. 43 Master of Gerard Brilis, Raising of Lazarus, Heribert Tenschert, Bibermühle, Switzerland, f. 165v Fig. 44 Master of Gerard Brilis, Madonna of Humility/Maria lactans, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 167v Fig. 45, Flemish, c. 1470, Madonna of Humility/Maria lactans, Baltimore, Walters Art Gallery, W. 208, f. 27v Fig. 46 Master of Gerard Brilis, Crucifxion, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C 26, f. 174v Fig. 47 Hand C Sachsenheim-Gebetbuch, Crucifixion, Stuttgart, Landesbibliothek., Fig. 48 Master of Gerard Brilis, Crucifixion, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. S.n. 12908, f. 31v Fig. 49 Lieven van Lathem, Massacre of the Innocents, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 105r (border Maître Y) Fig. 50 Lieven van Lathem, Flight into Egypt, Vienna, ÖNB, Cod. 1857, f. 112r (border Maître Y) Fig. 51 Master of the Feathery Clouds, Sacrifice of Elijah consumed by Flame (initial); Faith (border), Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 74r 72 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011 Fig. 52a Bedford Master, Faith, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 116r Fig. 52b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Faith, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 74r Fig. 52c Master of the Feathery Clouds, Faith, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 22va Fig. 53a Bedford Master, Hope, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 116v Fig. 53b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Hope, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 78r Fig. 53c Master of the Feathery Clouds, Hope, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 22vb Fig. 54a Bedford Master, Charity, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 117r Fig. 54b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Charity, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 83v Fig. 54c Master of the Feathery Clouds, Charity, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 23rb Fig. 55a Bedford Master, Temperance, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 117v Fig. 55b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Temperance, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 86r Fig. 55c Master of the Feathery Clouds, Temperance, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 23va Fig. 56a Bedford Master, Justice, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 118r Fig. 56b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Justice, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 88r Fig. 56c Master of the Feathery Clouds, Justice, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 23vb Fig. 57a Bedford Master, Prudence, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 118v Fig. 57b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Prudence, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 90v Fig. 58a Bedford Master, Fortitude, New York, Morgan Library, M. 359, f. 119r Fig. 58b Master of the Feathery Clouds, Fortitude, Brussels, Brussels, KB, Ms. II 7619, f. 93v Fig. 58c Master of the Feathery Clouds, Fortitude, Amsterdam, UBA, Ms. XXV C26, f. 24ra Fig. 59a Master of the Feathery clouds, Creation of Eve, The Hague, KB, Ms. 78 D 39, f. VIIIv Fig. 59b Master of the Feathery clouds, Creation of Eve, Amsterdam, UBA, XXV C 26, f. 17v Fig. 59c Bedford Master, Creation of Eve, New York, Morgan Library, M.359, f. 111v 73 P.L. Pumplin 26 October 2011
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz